Sap clarifications

Hi,
I have few questions which need to get clarification, can any one help me out with this.
1. Mass clearing Reversal:- I saw earlier post but not satisfied with the answer, just want to know again is their any perticular T.code whre we can  go for mass clearing reversal other than with the help of ABAP or z.
2. I would like to know how to see Recon a/c GL wise line itmes.
3. I purchased two rawmaterials from vendor x. let say raw mater 1 from vendor x and raw material 2 from the same vendor x.
    in vendor master i gave a link for this recon a.c and the vendor. i want to know is their any spro config for this link.i.e link between recon a/c and vendor.
4. If i want to block GL a/c FS00 screen for perticular co.code what is the procedure. as per my knwoldge if i block chart of a/cs ob13 i can't create new GL a/cs but i want to block perticular co.code.
Please guide me on these.
Thanks and Regards,
Rajitha.
Moderator: Please, avoid asking multiple questions per one thread. Additionally, please avoid asking basic questions

Hi
1. For Mass Reversal T Code: F.80 (or via FB08 Select mass reversal)
2.T Code: FBL3N You will get all GL A/c wise line for Recon A/C also
3.In vendor master data XK01 (WIhile creating vendor, Under Co Code data - Accounting info tab - You have to give Recon a/c (press f4) you will get list. For changing XK02, XK03
4.In fs00 select the account no from list and click on block button, you can block the account chartof account wise or co code wise.
Regards
Mani.S

Similar Messages

  • Problem in Creating the Org Unit

    Hi Experts,
    I am only using the FM RH_INSERT_INFTY to create an Org unit with Infotypes 1000,1001 & 1028. We have recently upgraded our system to SRM 7.0 from 4.0.
    Problem: The BP  is not being created corresponding to the Org Unit.
    But, When i created an Org Unit with above FMs in SRM 4.0, the BP number is created & is showing in PPOSA_BBP.
    Please let me know if i need to run any other FM / do any modifications.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vishnu Reddy

    Hello Aswini,
    I checked on a SRM 7 release and i get same behaviour as the one you described.
    I did not find any OSS notes regarding this point.
    I advise you to open an OSS message to have SAP clarification on this point.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Problem while copying the org unit

    Hi,
    SRM 4.0.
    In PPOMA_BBP, user is trying to create a new org unit by copying an existing org unit. When the new org unit is created, the relationship B012 (Is managed by) is getting copied and is showing in PP01 and also showing in HRP1001 table. In the current org structure, every org unit is having a manger (with a red hat). When copying the org unit, the manager is not getting coped but the relationship is getting copied as mentioned above.
    This should not happen. And this is not happening while creating a new org unit by clicking on the "Create" button in PPOMA_BBP.
    Appreciate for any suggestion how to solve this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Aswini

    Hello Aswini,
    I checked on a SRM 7 release and i get same behaviour as the one you described.
    I did not find any OSS notes regarding this point.
    I advise you to open an OSS message to have SAP clarification on this point.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • AE Email Notification Format

    The AE Config documentation says that you can use HTML vs Rich text in your email notification but I cant seem to find where you can set that.  Does anyone have any idea how to do this?

    SAP clarification:
    HTML option was mentioned becuase it allows you to use various text formats while rich text is mentioned because it allows you to choose a number of fonts and sizes.

  • Clarification on Canada Year End SAP Note : 1658938 and 1662043

    Dear All ,
    We are currently doing yearend SAP note updates for Canada and need clarification on Canada Year End SAP Note : 1658938 and 1662043 .
    SAP Note : 1658938 is with yearend delta transports which needs to be applied ,but it is mentioned that we need to apply all Year End related notes released on or before December 15th before applying the Delta transports.
    My query is that Note 1662043 released on 12/12/2011 whether this needs to be applied before or after applying delta transports mentioned in 1658938
    Pls help us on this .
    Thanks
    Muthuraj

    Hello Muthuraj,
    You need to apply note 1662043 the note before applying the delta transport.
    I hope it clarifies.
    With Regards,
    S.Karthik

  • Clarification on SAP-MM certification

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding the evaluation process for SAP Certification.
    In the section in which there are more than one correct answers, what is the process of evaluation. If there are 3 correct answers and we have marked only 2, do we lose marks for the entire question or do we get partial marks for the 2 correct answers. And, for the same question, if we mark 3 answers but if one of them is incorrect, do we get marks for the correct ones or do we lose marks for the entire question?
    Request someone who has given the ceritification exam to pl provide me with this clarification.
    Regards,
    Lakshmi

    Hi Laxmi,
    I don't think you will get the marks for the wrong answer or partially correct answers in SAP certification exams. Always complete correct answers rewards you marks.
    Regards
    Srinivas.

  • Clarification on SAP note 835466

    Hi,
    I need to proceed with the SAP note 835466 and I would like the clarification on steps # 3 and # 9 from it.
    The prerequisities note 834897 and the relevant application were applied already.
    Please can someone on this one?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I understand it in that way.
    You SP level is too low to be able to implement the note correction.
    You have first to update at least to SP 55 before being able to implement the note correction.
    That is one of the reason, to import regularly Support Packages.
    Regards,
    Olivier

  • DS - SAP BW Source clarifications

    Hi
    I have to connect to a SAP BW source and want to load a BW OLAP cube. In reading the DS Tech. documentation, it says SAP BW source would be similar to reading from a ERP source i.e., use a R/3 dataflow and generate the ABAP and do the extraction.
    My question is
    1) Can DS load the data directly from the BW cube ? (i.e can it leverage the BW accelarators that is used for reporting)
    (or)
    2) Using a DS SAP BW source provides only access to how the BW is organized and DS can load only from the underlying tables and not from the cubes directly. To actually load any data, you would have to write a join with my fact table and dimension tables to get the actual dimension value names and fact data into the ETL process
    Option 2) is my understanding of how DS works with BW correct ? If my assumption is not correct, can u clarify how to use the BW cubes directly within DS. Are there any additional documentation surrounding this ? Any implementation experience that you can share
    Thanks
    Dinesh

    With DS 12.2 you will be able to use SAP BW's OpenHub Interface as well to consume the cube data with DS. But that SAP BI provided interface has its own limitations, e.g. no BEX Queries can be used as source, keep that in mind. For the majority of the cases it will be the best solution however.

  • SAP Note #723909 Clarification needed: 2G heap for server nodes

    We mare upgrading from Enterprise 4.7 to ERP 6.0 SP12. For our ESS/MSS we will use standalone Java NW 7.0 SP14 with XSS SP12. Our portal servers and ERP ABAP are Unix Solaris 9 or 10 64-bit. The portal servers are 4CPU x 16G. We use three server nodes on our central instance and three server nodes on our dialog instance.  All server nodes have 2G heap.
    Recent load tests indicate we are reaching memory limits in the server nodes. THis causes frequent full GC with tenured objects deleted (very time consuming). We want to increase heap size > 2GB.  Note 723909 seems to say this can be done for 64-bit systems, but SAP appears to recommend additional server nodes with 2G heap. I think this is because of GC performance with large heap.
    - Are we supported with heap > 2G?
    - Are there still concerns with GC when heap > 2G?
    - Are there other reasons why heap should be no higher than 2G?
    Thanks in advance

    - Are we supported with heap > 2G?
    - Are there still concerns with GC when heap > 2G?
    - Are there other reasons why heap should be no higher than 2G?
    You´ve answered your questions yourself
    To have a fast J2EE engine you need to absolutely make sure all the heap is covered in physical memory. No swapping should take place at all. Once the system starts swapping in and out, you will loose a lot of performance.
    How big is your Oracle SGA? If you can decrase it so all the heaps (+ dispatcher heap) will fit in physical memory you can increase more. We use 2.5 - 3 GB heap (for BI) with three server nodes.
    Markus

  • Clarification of the logical structure of sap system & enterprise structure

    Dear Sap Gurus,
    Kindly help me to clarify the following words.I am grateful for answers.Answers will be rewarded with points.Simple & brief explanatios are highly appreciate.Thank you.
    1.FI Enterprise Structure
    my answers:Collection of organization units is called fi enterprise structure.
    2.Organization Units
    a.An element in the logical structure of sap system is called organization unit.
    3.The Logical Structure Of Sap System=?
    Best Regards
    priya desai

    Hi Priya,
    The Enterprise Structure represents the structure of a company according to personnel administrative, time management and payroll perspectives. The company structure describes elements of the company and there dependencies.
    The 'Organizational Units' in SAP, are the elements or structures representing the business functions, and are used in reporting. for example, Client (across the various modules), Company Code (FI), Controlling area (CO), Plant (logistics), sales organization (SD), Purchasing organization (MM), Employee Group (HR) etc.
    Thanks
    Para

  • Need clarification on SAP notes

    Hi,
    I need information on SAP notes relation.
    Suppose a note X says corrections are delivered in the attached correction instruction, then its enough if we implement that specific note X.
    If we go to correction instruction then it may have several other notes, do we need to implement all those notes specified  in correction instruction 1st and then implement main note or directly we can apply Main note X.
    If we apply main note obvisoulsy all the notes within correction instructions will be implemented
    Regards,
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi
    Suppose a note X says corrections are delivered in the attached correction instruction, then its enough if we implement that specific note X.
    =>Before implementing those correction verify whether that X note applicable to your system release. Also verify is any manual code correction instructed in that note.
    If we go to correction instruction then it may have several other notes, do we need to implement all those notes specified in correction instruction 1st and then implement main note or directly we can apply Main note X.
    => Before implementing those correction verify whether that X note applicable to your system release or its already implemented in your system. All these Prerequisites need to implement before final correction.
    If we apply main note obvisoulsy all the notes within correction instructions will be implemented.
    => No we need to implement Prerequisites notes before main notes.
    Thank

  • Need clarification on Legal implication for creating a new plant in SAP

    Dear all,
        My customer is  having two manufacturing plant in India.
        One is DTA for domestic business and the other is EOU, 100 % Export oriented. In both plant they are manufacturing fridges.
        SAP implementation gone live on last july.
        Now they are starting Washing machine manufacturing inside the DTA plant for domestic business.  But they want to go for a new plant to be created in SAP,  they are not going to register that plant with government.
       They want that plant only for reporting purpose. I want to know will it create any leagel implecation while posting excise invoice or with Register maintanence.'
       Need your advice.
    With Regards
    R.S.Mani

    I think you were asking from SAP point of view but I would prefer to answer the practice what should be followed from manufacturer's angle.
    If you treat any place as a separate plant, the first and foremost criteria which you should look into is excise part.
    From excise point of view, you need to get concurrence from the authorities to do business with the same excise group assuming that the address is same of the existing plant.
    If address is different, then you should treat it as a separate excise group and accordingly, you need to have a separate excise group and series group and therefore, excise registers and sales tax registers will be a separate one.
    Though your question should be answered in a lengthy way, better ask the client with their range office who will be the deciding authorities.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Need clarification on application of OSS Release Note:391846 in SAP ERP 6.0

    Hi Experts,
    We are upgrading the SAP R/3 4.7 to SAP ERP 6.0 in one of our client. In SAP R/3 4.7, OSS Note:391846 has been applied for Automatic Explosion of BOM while converting the planned order. I would like to know whether this functionality is covered in SAP ERP 6.0 or is it required to apply the same OSS note in SAP ERP 6.0?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Bandaru

    Dear Venkat,
    note 391846 is also valid for ERP600.
    This modification is not part of the SAP Standard Release 600. It's also in 600 a modification.
    If you want this function you have to implement the note again in your actual release.
    Regards,
    Sabine

  • Clarification regarding data upload in to SAP System

    Hi All,
    The requirements goes like this.
    There is a file in the Application Server in which there are many records.
    Each record will have to create two Idocs based on two particular fields.
    For example, If A, B, C, D are the fields
    One Idoc shold have A,B,D fields and another Idoc should have A,C,D fields.
    Now, the problem these Idocs should get updated in SAP.
    The requirement is so confusing that the Idocs are posted and again updated in the same SAP System.
    How to achieve this scenario ? Is is possible to create an Idoc and update the records in the same SAP System.
    Do we need to use LSMW along with this in this scenario??
    If so, does this LSMW map the same record to two Idocs as mentioned in the above example scenario.
    Please provide me with your valuable suggestions...
    Thanks,
    Babu Kilari

    Hi ars,
    Can you explain the process more clearly ?
    Thanks,
    Babu Kilari

  • SAP JCo Clarifications

    Hi Experts,
    I have installed SAP Business Connector 4.8 for one of our ECC 6 EHP 4 systems (without AS JAVA) and maintained all the settings for SAP server and listener in adapter settings. I have also maintained correct settings in SAPBC rfc in SM59. The SAPBC is working fine for the xml documents. The client also wants an external Java application to be able to call up the SAP system for business reasons. Now in help.sap.com page "http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6f/1bd5c6a85b11d6b28500508b5d5211/content.htm" its written that "SAP JCo is automatically installed when you use SAP Business Connector or SAP Web Application Server for Java." Since I have already installed SAP BC, the JCo should have got installed automatically (I checked LD_LIBPATH, no entry for jco path there, also no classpath is set). How do I check whether this has happened or not? I am dealing with JCo as well as BC for the first time and don't have much idea about them. When the JAVA team is trying to do some work on this, they are getting the below error:
    com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (102) JCO_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: JCO.Client not connected in repository call
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Repository.getVersion(JCO.java:17820)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Repository.queryFunctionInterface(JCO.java:18148)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Repository.queryFunctionInterface(JCO.java:17881)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Repository.getFunctionInterface(JCO.java:17991)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$BasicRepository.getFunctionTemplate(JCO.java:17062)
    Also, I am getting the below output for the mentioned command:
    sapqat01.putnaminv.com:ecqadm 210> java -jar /opt/sapbc48/server/packages/SAP/code/jars/static/sapjco3.jar -stdout
    The java class could not be loaded. java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: (com/sap/conn/jco/rt/About) bad major version at offset=6
    We are currently running jre 1.4.2, so there is a mismatch in the version in which jco was compiled. What JCO or SAP BC version should I use in this case?
    Your help is appreciated.
    Best Regards,
    Vikash Chandra

    Vikas,
    I hope, the below link should help you.
    Link Removed: asset deleted
    Thanks,
    Hamendra
    Edited by: Jason Lax on Feb 1, 2012 11:21 AM

Maybe you are looking for