SAP DEV & QAS ECC 6.0 EHP 5

Hi Anyone,
i am running SAP on HP Rack Servers, Configuration is Good, running it on Suse linux with Maxdb, DEV is working perfectly fine, QAS is Very Slow even if i try to execute any report it takes ages...or do transports it takes so long
Any idea what to do ..
Specs;
2 x Quad  Core, Xeon 64-bit
16 GB
Thanks
I Dont see any RED areas in st02
System:                             Tune summary
Date + Time of Snapshot: 06.09.2012      16:57:21    Startup:     06.09.2012 15:26:43
Buffer             HitRatio % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB % Free Sp. Dir. Size FreeDirEnt % Free Dir Swaps DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB)                                                                                   0
   Table definition     65.86     6,735      4,251      75.57    20,000     15,113      75.57     0   6,301
   Field definition     72.07    31,562     22,880      76.27    20,000     18,021      90.11     0   3,192
   Short NTAB           81.36     3,625      2,836      94.53     5,000      4,486      89.72     0     514
   Initial records       3.80     6,625      5,129      85.48     5,000      3,556      71.12     0   1,444
                                                                                                  0
program                94.90   400,000    217,794      58.77   100,000     96,964      96.96     0   9,108
CUA                    88.86     6,000      3,329      69.34     3,000      2,945      98.17     0      71
Screen                 96.72     4,297      3,366      82.24     2,000      1,937      96.85     0      64
Calendar              100.00       488        256      53.56       200         80      40.00     0     120
OTR                   100.00     4,096      3,297     100.00     2,000      2,000     100.00     0
                                                                                                  0
Tables                                                                                           0
   Generic Key          98.54    29,297          1                5,000      3,566      71.32     6   1,613
   Single record        74.39    10,000      4,429      44.87       500        443      88.60     0   4,468
                                                                                                  0
Export/import          47.94     4,096      2,334      70.79     2,000      1,740      87.00     0
Exp./ Imp. SHM                   4,096      3,297     100.00     2,000      2,000     100.00     0
SAP Memory      Curr.Use % CurUse[KB] MaxUse[KB] In Mem[KB] OnDisk[KB] SAPCurCach HitRatio %
Roll area            0.04        423      5,552    262,144    786,432   IDs           96.62
Page area            0.01        133        712    262,144    786,432   Statement     76.00
Extended memory      3.42    143,360    692,224  4,190,208          0                  0.00
Heap memory                        0      2,498          0          0                  0.00

Thanks for a Prompt response,
Attached is the snapshot of the st03n,
Even if i run db13 it shows me this error..

Similar Messages

  • Does anybody know benefices of upgrading SAP ERP from version ECC 6.0 EHP 7 to ECC 6.06 EHP 10?

    An upgrade of ERP SAP from version  ECC 6.0 EHP 7 to ECC 6.06 EHP 10 is being planned in the company I work for. However, I don´t know what the benefices are to   implement this upgrade so I wonder if someone knows benefices of upgrading SAP ERP from version ECC 6.0 EHP 7 to ECC 6.06 EHP 10?
    Regards, Alejandro

    Hi _Miguel
    I am going from ECC 6.0 to ECC 6.06. However, I don´t know what the benefices are to   implement this upgrade so I wonder if someone knows benefices of upgrading SAP ERP from version 6.0 to 6.06
    regards, Alejandro

  • Compatability of ECC DEV&QAS on Win 2008/SQL 2008 with Prdn on Win 2003/Win

    We are planning our  upgrade of my SAP landscape (ECC 6.0 , Portal & BI) . Would it be feasible and do-able to migrate sandbox, dev, and qas to Windows 2008 & SQL 2008 , allow the support team to use the 2008 landscape.  That means that my Dev. environments would be on Wind 2008 & SQL 2008 while my production would still be Win 2003 & 2008.   I'm not feeling like this is workable for the transport domain? will I have issues with transports across to production?
    So the question is
    Is it possible to transport from Windows 2008 SQL 2008 landscape over to a production landscape that is on Windows 2003 SQL 2005?
    Any other issues I should be aware of ?
    BTW, we would have Portal and BI setup in the same way  DEV & QAS on the newer releases and Production on the Older release.
    NOTE: this would be for about 3 - 4 weeks
    Please advise
    Maria

    Thank you,
    So you're saying that if I had the DEV environment in Win 2008 SQL 2008 (being the transport domain) , and the production environment in win 2003 sql 2005, IF we had to transport across this type of landscape there should be NO issues. 
    Nothing else to think of as posing risk?
    Maria

  • Install both SAP ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and Solution Manager in C drive

    Hi, SDN fellows.
    I just want to confirm this.
    I am trying to install SAP ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and Solution Manager in C drive. Are these OK, since they both will be installed under the C:\usr folder?
    What precaution we need to install these two SAP components in the same drive (C)?
    I am installing both components in MS Window Server 2008 R2 SP1 with MS SQL Server 2005 SP3.
    Thanks,
    KC

    Hi, Nick.
    Sorry, I missed the "IDES". I am installing SAP ECC6.0 EHP4 IDES system for training purpose within the organization.
    I am referring to the Installation Guide - SAP ERP 6.0 EHP Ready ABAP on Window MS SQL Server (Based on NW 7.0 incl EHP 1). All downloaded installation files are from: EHP4 for SAP ERP 6.0/NW7.01 --> IDES --> --> Widnows Server --> MS SQL Server.
    The OS is installed in C drive.
    I have allocated 250GB in C drive and 200GB in D drive from SAN.
    For IDES system (I know it is similar to the standard ECC), is it also recommended to install in D drive (separate from the OS)?
    In this case, should I install both Solution Manger and IDES in D drive?
    Or what is the best combination where I should install these two systems?
    Thanks,
    KC

  • What are the commands using in SAP ECC 6.0 ehp on SYBASE Database? Backup and restore commands?

    Hi All,
    What are the commands using in SAP ECC 6.0 ehp on SYBASE Database? Backup and restore commands?

    Hi Jayachander,
    Have a look at these sap notes:
    For taking backup: Schedule from DB13 and get the exact command from Logs
    1841993 - SYB: How to schedule backups in DBA Cockpit
    1887068 - SYB: Using external backup and restore with SAP Sybase ASE
    How to restore DB
    1611715 - SYB: How to restore a Sybase ASE database server (Windows)
    Divyanshu

  • Potential Conflict? - ECC 6.0 EHP 4 vs. SAP PI 7.0 SP12

    Hi Experts - We are currently upgrading our ERP system to ECC 6.0 EHP 4.
    Our middleware layer is a SAP PI 7.0 in SP12.
    Are there potential conflicts between these two? Maybe around Proxies?
    My current understanding is that SAP PI isn't closely coupled with the ECC system (we mainly use IDocs, some Proxies),
    so there shouldne be any issues.
    Do you have a different view or experiences? Thanks for your help.
    Best Regards, Mathias.

    Mathias,
    I would suggest to go through the upgrade document to get the exact issues if any are there:
    http://service.sap.com/instguides -> SAP Business Suite Applications -> SAP ERP -> SAP ERP 6.0 -> Upgrade. Then select the OS and Database.
    Regards,
    ---Satish

  • What is the average duration of 1 full SAP life cycle or 1 end-to-end implementation. How long does it take to prepare DEV, QAS and PRD?

    What is the average duration of 1 full SAP life cycle or 1 end-to-end implementation. How long does it take to prepare DEV, QAS and PRD in any company?

    Anand,
    let me start with saying that the question you ask may not help you to determine the duration of your project. As Ryan and others stated the duration of the project is highly dependent on the scope of the solution you are implementing, geographical scope, amount of modifications/enhancements, number of languages, number of users that need to be trained, amount of standard processes customer is able to re-use in the implementation and many other factors (like quality of implementation contractor you will chose and availability of customer and implementors resources). I can probably go on for another couple lines, but I guess you get the idea.
    With that out of the way let's talk about some example implementations that will give you an idea - Ryan did great job outlining what I would call traditional approach above. I have couple examples where customers leveraged innovative deployment strategies that are available today. In particular the project teams leveraged pre-packaged services like RDS, World Template or Best Practices as their baseline solution and they built from there. Second acceleration technique customers now leverage is the deployment in the SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud to accelerate the time to initial setup of the system and thus move from traditional blueprinting to scope validation exercise that further shortens the time. There are other acceleration techniques we see applied in some cases like use of iterative implementation of the delta requirements on top of the baseline solution.
    Let me offer few examples to illustrate what I explained above:
    ERP implementation at Schaidt Innovations with 3 months long deployment of ERP solution using ERP RDS as a baseline (you can view their testimonial here - Schaidt Innovations: SAP ERP on HANA in the cloud - YouTube)
    Customer in Asia with global template deployment that leveraged SAP ERP for Manufacturing with deployment to cloud and 9 countries rollout (Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, UK, Germany and US). The initial deployment took 4 months for first country and 2 months for rollout into the additional 8 countries - so total of 6 months. The original plan using traditional approach with full blueprint and heavy configuration was estimated to be more than double of the actual deployment time.
    There are many other examples where customers follow the assemble-to-order delivery model for their project and gain significant benefits doing so. I suggest you to review some of the recordings we did in 2013 about this approach and if you are member of ASUG review the Agile ASAP sessions we did for ASUG PM SIG.
    Link to webinars: SAP A2O Webinar Series Schedule
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Jan

  • What is the difference in SAPS requirement for ECC 6.0 (No EhP)  vs ECC 6.7 (EhP 7)?

    Hi Team,
    Hope you are doing well, Can you please explain the below points.
    1)      What is the difference in SAPS requirement for ECC 6.0 (No EhP)  vs ECC 6.7 (EhP 7)?
    2)     What is the split of SAPS between Core and RAM?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Deepak,
    We are not partner/ customer with SAP, so don't have access to tools.
    Can you please give theoretical idea about
    1)      What is the difference in SAPS requirement for ECC 6.0 (No EhP)  vs ECC 6.7 (EhP 7)?
    2)     What is the split of SAPS between Core and RAM?
    Thank you,
    Gopi Reddy

  • How to backup and restore in sap ECC 6.0  EHP 6 in HANA database

    how to backup and restore in sap ECC 6.0  EHP 6 in HANA database

    Stop loading your interview questions here - otherwise your user ID will be deleted.
    Thread locked!

  • XI Dev. connected to ECC Dev and ECC Qas

    Hello Folks,
    I have a question -
    We have 2 XI systems: Development, and Production (no QAS)
    And 3 ECC systems: Dev, Qas and Prd.
    Now we have the XI Dev connected to the ECC Dev.
    I'd like to know if it's possible to also connect the XI Dev System to the ECC Qas system.
    I mean, to create the RFC dest. in both systems, a new Business System for ECC QAS; and all the necessary config.... and if it won't take problems when we have to transport the Interfaces from DEV to PRD.
    Thanx in advance.
      Juan

    Hi juan,
    just be carefull when you add you QUA config in ID and then when you will transport...
    1. in your ID, when will define the config with QUA, do NOT ADD the object to your Scenario.... if for the transport you choose the option "Transport all objects of my Scenario"... else you will have a problem in Prod because of the system QUA. Indeed with transport DEV become PROD but your ECC QUA cannot become ...
    2. when you will transport to your PI prod :
       - check my first point or use option "Transport by selecting each objects" and choose only object linked link to your DEV.
       - delete also the Condition option (if you have one) in the Receiver Determination if in th receivers list you have DEV and QUA.... because after the transport the ECC QUA become nothing.
    So yes we can. There is no technical issue.... if you do properly the things !!
    Regards.
    Mickael

  • Upgrade from ECC 6.0 EHP 4 to EHP 7.0 influence on SRM Add-On

    Hi everyone,
    We want to upgrade our ECC 6.0 EHP 4 to ECC 6.0 EHP 7. We are currently running SRM 7 EHP1 as ERP Add-On in the one-client scenario.
    I have read the EHP7 Upgrade/restriction note also as the SAP Note 963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP 6.0
    But i did not find the information if we have to upgrade our SRM 7 EHP 1 to EHP3.
    Please make this clear for me.
    Best regards,
    David

    Yes, you will need to upgrade the SRM system to EHP3.
    1951805 - Adjusted Version Interoperability for Business Suite 7i2013
    1388258 - Version Interoperability within the SAP Business Suite
    You can make use of the UDA tool to confirm this.
    http://service.sap.com/uda
    As you are upgrading the ERP system to EHP 7 which is based on NetWeaver 7.4 you will need to upgrade the other systems like SRM, BW to a supported release.
    Regards
    RB

  • ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

    Hi Basis Expert,
    while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
    Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
    Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
    We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
    Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
    Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and  find the forum but no luck.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
    >
    It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
    Thanks
    Sunny
    Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

  • 10g Upgrade Order (DEV - QAS - PRD)

    If I am upgrading Oracle 9.2.0.6 to 10.2.0.2, what issues will I face if I upgrade the landscape in the order of DEV, QAS, PRD.
    I will wait a week between upgrades.
    Will transports fail?
    Will SAP face any issues having different Oracle versions?
    Do I have to upgrade DEV, QAS, PRD at the same time?

    -> transports will not fail as long as the sap release will not change...
    -> normally all sap systems should run smoothly on supported database platforms...10g should be no problem...the three system reside on different hosts?
    to be sure (sap states that different kernel releases within one system landscape can lead to problems) try to keep the time between QAS and PRD very short and avoid transporting...
    -> no, you don't have to upgrade all systems at the same time...a week between DEV and QAS is enough
    GreetZ, AH

  • SRM 7.01 with ECC 6.0 EHP 7.0

    Hi Guys,
    Does anyone have an idea on SRM 7.01 compatibility with ECC 6.0 EHP 7.0. Any things needs to be taken care from SRM side after an upgrade to EHP 7 in ECC side.
    Please share your experience.
    Thanks for your reply in advance.

    Hi Imran,
    It is compatible, But still for confirmation please see the product availability matrix.
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/support/pam/pam.html?smpsrv=https%3A%2F%2Fwebsmp203.sap-ag.de#pvnr=01200615320900003495&ts=4&pt=t%7Co
    Best regards,
    Rohit

  • Need ECC 6.0 EHP 5 Fresh installation Manually prepared Step by step Guide

    Hi Expert,
    I am new for Installations of SAP systems presently am working in support project. I am going to install ECC 6.0 EHP 5 with
    Linux/oracle  fresh installation on 12/01/2012.
    Can any one help me to do the installation.
    If you have manually prepared Step by step document please mail me
    my mail id is :sprasad.k7@gmail
    THANKS IN ADVANCE.
    Regards,
    Sivaprasad.
    Edited by: kurapati siva on Jan 7, 2012 10:09 PM

    Srikishan D wrote:
    Hi,
    >
    > Check out the steps mentioned in the official SAP Document:
    >
    > http://service.sap.com/instguides -> SAP Business Suite Apps -> SAP ERP 6.0 -> SAP EhP EhP5
    > Installation guide for your OS/DB
    > First Steps for EhP5 for SAP ERP 6.0
    > How to Install EhP5 for ERP 6.0
    >
    > - An EhP5 Ready installation only installs a system at Netweaver 7.0 EhP2 and ERP Components at 600 level.
    > - You need a Solution Manager 7.01 at Stack 26 to generate a stack.xml for EhP5 Installation.
    > - Check which technical usage types you need to install as part of Eh5.
    >
    EHP5 installation comes with Central application component i.e. SAP_APPL and EA-APPL on 605 version. Its different from EHP4 installation where all ERP components comes on 600 release.
    Thanks
    Sunny

Maybe you are looking for