SAP EhP1 SPS6 for NetWeaver 7.0 - tp status 230

While installing SAP EhP1 SPS6 for NetWeaver 7.0 in PBW
(BI production system) the process fails at phase
MAIN_NEWBAS/TABIM_UPG - with tp status 230 and unresolved requests in
buffer.
Anyone has a clue ?
Best regards,
Roger
PHASES.LOG
1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "TABIM_UPG" ("20110716054322")
4 ETQ399 Set environment for standard connect:
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '61', GwService = 'sapgw61'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_db4_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=0
1 ETQ206 Executing pre-phase DB specific actions.
1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'MAIN_NEWBAS/TABIM_UPG'.
1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'TABIMUPG.BUF'
2 ETQ399 Arg[1] = 'TABIMUPG.TPP'
2 ETQ399 Arg[2] = 'TABIMUPG.TP0'
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'TABIMUPG.ELG'
2 ETQ399 Arg[4] = 'XPRASUPG.BUF'
2WETQ399 tp terminated with status 230
4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_ACT_ON_NEW_BUFFER"
4 ETQ381 request "TP_ACT_ON_NEW_BUFFER" means "act on the tp buffer,
new format"
4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_SYS"
4 ETQ383 translates to path "/usr/sap/PBW/SYS/exe/run"
2 ETQ399XAnalyze summary error logfile TABIMUPG.ELG and remove all error2 ETQ399Xconditions as described in the upgrade manual
1 ETQ207 Executing post-phase DB specific actions.
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20110716054327
SAPehpi.log
CURRENTPHASE MAIN_NEWBAS/TABIM_UPG
...started at 20110716054322
...begin processing at 20110716054322
INFO: Nothing has been done in TABIM_UPG.
..times self: 0.130000/0.060000 usr/sys, children 1.110000/0.000000
usr/sys.
..finished at 20110716054327 with status UNRESOLVED REQUESTS IN BUFFER.
Error message set: 'Unresolved requests in buffer PBW
Check logfiles 'TABIMUPG.ELG'
and '/BWIASP1/usr/sap/PBW/put/EHPI/abap/log/SAPehpi.ECO''
...begin dialogue at 20110716054328

Added *allobj to PBWOFR user profile and repeated the phase with success.

Similar Messages

  • What is SAP PACE Program for NetWeaver Solutions

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me about any details for the "SAP PACE (Pro-Active Customer Engagement) Program for NetWeaver Solutions".
    I want to know, what is this program or product?
    What does it do? is it good to recommend the client for implementing this product?
    Any inputs are highly appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    I'm afraid in standard SAP do not have such report.
    As a workaround you could try the following: The correction would consist of the following steps:
    1) remove the link between the budget and the IT0759 in the IMG step "Assign Compensation Review Item Attributes"
    Here you will need to remove the "Budget Type"
    2) Then you should delete the IT0759 records for which the budget was not updated (revert the process completely, this means that if the status of IT0759 is "active" you will need to check IT0008 also)
    3) next step will be to reset the link removed in step 1) betweenthe budget and the IT0759
    4) create new IT0759 records as initially intended
    Please note that you should try this in a test or development system first and check if everything worked well before using it in the production system.
    Hope this help
    Sarah

  • APSHELL SAP BPC for NetWeaver

    Hi BPC Friends
    I am using SAP BPC 7 for Netweaver and now I don't see the Appset Apshell.
    In the past I have used it to create new appset like copy but now I don't try to see it.
    thanks
    regards
    Michele Medaglia

    thanks for your answer.
    I have the password of the bpcadm but I don't see the appset appshell.
    I have run the program UJS_ACTIVATE_CONTENT but it finished with error because appshell is active.
    Cai I try to delet the appshell with this program and after to activate with this program the appset?
    What do you advice me?
    thanks
    regards Michele

  • SAP Best Practises for Logistic Modules

    Dear Reader,
    Does anyone know how to find SAP Best Practises for Netweaver 2004s Logistic scenarios (SD, MM,)
    The old Netwvr 2004 scenarioas are less helpful, especially in Inventory mgmt.
    Thanks

    Check this link, this is the latest I guess.
    [SAP Best Practices|http://help.sap.com/bp_bw370/html/index.htm]
    Cheers,
    Neel.

  • SAP EHP1 FOR NetWeaver Mobile 7.1

    Hi,
    We plan to install a server for NetWeaver Mobile but wonder to install SAP EHP1 FOR NetWeaver Mobile 7.1 or SAP FOR NetWeaver Mobile 7.1. Any enhancement for the ehp1 package and limitation? Thanks,

    Hi,
    as Siva already mentioned - just to add the screen - if you enter service.sap.com/swdc and drill down to download the EHP support package for mobile, you get the following warning right at the top:
    Important Note:
    SAP enhancement package 1 for SAP NetWeaver Mobile 7.1 contains changes mainly targeted for use by the mobile applications SAP Mobile Defense & Security 1.6 and SAP Mobile Direct Store Delivery 4.0. Therefore SAP recommends to install SAP enhancement package 1 for SAP NetWeaver Mobile 7.1 only if you want to use one of the corresponding applications SAP Mobile Defense & Security 1.6 or SAP Mobile Direct Store Delivery 4.0.
    Due to that, you should go with usual MI7.1 stack.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Oliver

  • Download for SAP EHP1 FOR NetWeaver Mobile 7.1

    Hi,
    In the PAM, SAP EHP1 for NW Mobile 7.1 is available.
    We have the server up up and running.
    The developer is using NWDS EHP 7.1 and requires the 'mobile plugin'.
    I already visit download site, but download available are,
    SAP NW 04
    SAP NW 7.0
    SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW 7.0
    SAP NW CE 7.1
    SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW CE7.1
    SAP NW MOBILE 7.1 (already look)
    SAP NW PI 7.1
    SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW PI7.1
    1) Where can i download 'mobile plugin' for the NWDS EHP7.1 ? Step by step install the plug in?
    Please advise. Thanks.

    Hi
    Please check here...
    Service Market Place :- Download>>SAP Software Distribution Center>>Support Package and Patches>>Support Packages and Patches - Entry by Application Group>>SAP NetWeaver>>SAP NETWEAVER>>SAP NETWEAVER MOBILE 7.1>Entry by Component
    Hope this will help you.
    Thanks
    Arun

  • EHP1 for Netweaver Mobile 7.1 available or not?

    I am trying to do a install of Netweaver 7.1, and for that reason I would like to have the latest version available. According to the installation and media guides, there should be a Install Master and Kernel 7.11 available but I am unable to locate this in the software distribution center. I can find it for Netweaver PI 7.1, but not for Netweaver Mobile. Anyone who knows more about this?
    I could of course install 7.1 and then the EHP1 as an upgrade, but I already installed SQL Server 2008 and NW 7.1 can not be installed directly on MSSQL 2008, so I thought it woudl be easier to just make one install and save a lot of time and extra steps.

    I have to come back to this topic, because of a reply I got in another thread some time ago from Mr Stefan Wawrzinek:
    "SAP NetWeaver Mobile Always Connected is supporting Stylesheets with NetWeaver 7.1 EHP 1."
    My goal by installing Netweaver 7.1 Mobile is to test the "Always Connected" functionality with mobile devices. The tests I have done with Netweaver 7.0 are very disappointing. Either I get good performance but absolutely zero control over the look & feel (using parameter PieClient), or I get terrible performance but a good looking interface (stylesheets and javascript too heavy for mobile devices).
    So it seems I will anyway have to wait for EHP1. But what is puzzling me is the fact that there is no Java application server in Netweaver Mobile 7.1. Does that mean that SAP now supports the parameter PieClient for mobile-compatible rendering of HTML also for ABAP WebDynpro applications? With NW 7.0, it was necessary to use Java WebDynpro to use the PieClient parameter.
    Any insight greatly appreciated!

  • EHP1 for NetWeaver + EHP4 ?

    Hello,
    Is it possible to install the EHP1 for NetWeaver 7.0 without installing the EHP4 for ERP ?
    Because we have installed EHP3 on our ERP and we want to install now EHP1 for NetWeaver there.
    Regards
    Rainer

    There is no option who says to keep the version. Its just the error like this:
    ERROR: Unable to generate addon queue due to missing addons or support packages.
    Missing Support Package(s):
          (EA-HR)
          (FINBASIS)
          (SAP_APPL)
          (SAP_BS_FND)
          (SEM-BW)
          (WEBCUIF)
    The Enhancement Package Stack does not fit to the current system.
    SAINT I cannot use, because there is a message, that says I can only use the EHPI.
    The only way to solve this, I must change the XML file, but since I created it on the marketplace, I cannot change it.
    Info, as its written in the note:
    "When Enhancement Package 1 for SAP NetWeaver 7.0 is installed on a NetWeaver system, the stack XML file for the SAP EHP Installer (SAPehpi) is not allowed to contain packages for ERP software components. Due to this technical limitation, the EHP4 packages for the ERP software components cannot be included via the stack XML file."
    I cannot add the required EHP4 components to the XML-file? How should I solve that problem?
    Regards,
    Rainer

  • Component Version Dependencies of SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW PI 7.3 & SAP EP 7.3

    Hi,
    Our Client is plannig to implement SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW PI 7.3 & SAP Enterprise Portal 7.3.I have been asked to find out any component version dependencies or pre-requisites for these 2 SAP products.I am not getting it from anywhere.If anyone has any information please do reply me back.
    Note : Currently there is no PI,EP system in our landscape.

    Hi,
    It will work with EHP5. We also have same systems in our landscape.
    And I would suggest you to read the guide below
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50b765af-91a5-2e10-9692-d4764d024cb3?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • SAP Best Practice For Unicode Upgrades - NetWeaver 2004s

    Team SAP,
    I have a customer that is starting to plan for a Unicode upgrade.  The question from the customer is as follows:
    What is the SAP Best Practice for Unicode Upgrades?  They will be upgrading from a BW 3.5 System to NetWeaver 2004s, and their question is ... should they:
       a) Perform the Unicode Upgrade At The Same Time As Their BW 3.5 > NetWeaver 2004s Upgrade, or
       b) Perform NetWeaver 2004s Upgrade first, and then at a later date, perform the Unicode Upgrade?
    Thank you in advance for any guidance or counsel you may be able to offer.
    -M

    Hi Michael,
    Check these links:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ee7407a0-0501-0010-81ae-e329029b1074
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7e259990-0201-0010-6085-e7c5aec5af1d
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5411d290-0201-0010-b49b-a6145fb16d15
    Bye
    Dinesh

  • Migration of "CRONACLE for SAP solutions" to "SAP CPS for Netweaver"

    Hi,
    We have standalone  Cronacle/CPS 6.02.  We are in the process of researching about migrating to  "SAP CPS for Netweaver"  like SAP CPS M33. We have the following questions.
    1)Is a migration path available to migrate from "CRONACLE for SAP solutions" to "SAP CPS for Netweaver" ?.
    2)What are the benefits of going to "SAP CPS for Netweaver" ?.
    3)Is the migration can be done by ourselves or any SAP migration consultant is required?.
    Please advise.
    Thanks.
    Raj.

    Hi Laurence, Raj,
    This question is very old and I had not seen it before.
    To upgrade from CPS 6.0.2 or 7.0.4 to 8.0.0 (aka M33). I do not know if SAP consultancy offers anything for this, you want to check with them. SAP might refer you to Redwood, though.
    As for the differences, where do I start ... ;-)
    Actually, CPS 8 is a major platform shift. Version 6 and 7 were PL/SQL-based solutions, version 8 is Java-based. You have many more possibilities built-in, such as better XBP 3.0 support, web services, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP PI/XI control, ... the list could go on forever.
    Some older platforms (very, very old) are no longer supported, afaik, but you get native z/OS (mainframe) platform agents, AS/400 agents ... the user interface is platform independent, so you can access it from any OS including, but not limited to, Windows, Unix, Linux, and Mac OS X. There is even an iPhone/iPad client.
    BTW, I do not know how long version 6 and 7 are supported.
    The platform shift means that you might have to use a PL/SQL API in version 8. I guess it depends on how much PL/SQL you use. If most of your jobs are SAP and OS jobs, you would not even need that.
    Regards,
    HP

  • SAP Bibliothek for NetWeaver 04

    Hi all,
    do you have any idea if the pdf docs stored in this link:
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/Data/htm/english.htm
    Have also similar docs been released for Netweaver 04 version?
    Latest version I found is R/3 4.6
    Thanks in advance,
    Loukas

    Hi,
    PDF docu is not provided any longer that way.
    Beginning from 6.20 you should install the CHM Windows docu DVD (Mat-Nos can be found in http://help.sap.com/ > NetWeaver). This so called HTMLHELPFile type of help appears in an extra viewer, which offers 'Printing of a section including all sub sections'. So if you have a PDF printer installed on your PC, you can print all sections you are interested in.
    Best regards
    Christoph Nake
    PM
    SAP

  • Sap ehp1 - BO XI 3.1 ( xcelsius)  , what to install?

    Hello
    I have installed SAP EHP1 Netweaver 7.01, i have till
    ABAP :
    SAP_ABA     701     3     SAPKA70103     Cross-Application Component
    SAP_BASIS     701     3     SAPKB70103     SAP Basis Component
    PI_BASIS     701     3     SAPK-70103INPIBASIS     Basis Plug-In
    SAP_BW     701     3     SAPKW70103     SAP Business Warehouse
    i wanted to install till SP5, i've downloadad from  service.sap.com/swdc
    whole till sp5 for ABAP part
    do i need to install java stack till SP5 also?
    if yes, what are more important or whole ? like:
              o Application Server ABAP  - YES
              o Application Server Java
              o Adobe Document Services
              o SAP LiveCache
              o BI Java
              o BI Partner
              o Business Intelligence
              o Enterprise Portal
              o EP Core
              o EP Content
              o Mobile Infrastructure (MI)
              o MI Client
              o Development Infrastructure
              o Developer Workplace
              o Developer Studio
              o Process Integration (PI/XI)
              o Search and Classif. (TREX)
              o Partner Connect. Kit (PI/XI)
              o Content PI/XI
              o Business System 6.20 PI/XI
              o Content Server
              o Job Scheduler
              o Job Scheduler standalone
              o Business Explorer (BI) - DONE
              o Frontend - DONE
              o J2SE Adapter Engine (PI/XI)
              o J2EE Adapter Engine (PI/XI)
              o SAP Web Dispatcher
    I never installed SCA, how can I install it? and how can check java stacks (if Sp3 is last for ABAP, what about JAVA? )
    my version is 1.4.17 sdk - amd64
    thx
    Regards,
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    These are some few basic questions which you need to know before you install any SAP system.
    Both ABAP and JAVA should be at the same patch level for any dual stack SAP system. It is recommended.
    The Java Support Packs depends on which Product of Netweaver you are using. I would recommend you download the support package stack and apply it.
    You can check the Java support package info under http://<hostname>:<http port>/index.html
    You can check for the installed Java components and patch them accordingly.
    You have to install SCAs using JSPM.
    Hope all the queries are answered.
    Cheers.......,
    Raghu

  • BPC 7.5 for Netweaver : SP Stacks

    Hello,
    I need to install the SAP BPC 7.5 for Netweaver add-on.
    The party ABAP server will be installed on a Netweaver 7.0 SP6 EhP1.
    The .NET application/web server will in turn installed on a Windows 2008 server.
    The last level of SP Stack available for BPC is Stack 11.
    Do you have any feedback on the stability of the latest SP for BPC?
    It seems that SP10 have bugs.
    Which SP has the most stability?
    Thank you for your feedback.
    Chris

    Hi Chris,
    I stand to be corrected.
    However, my understanding is that SP 7 for BPC is a prerequisite for compatability with NetWeaver 7.3.
    SP 7 is also backwards compatable with previous versions of NetWeaver.
    I have successful installed and worked on a stable environment:
    BPC SP 7
    NetWeaver 7.0
    You may want to bear this in mind if you are planning to ramp up your NetWeaver. You may find yourself installing a previous SP for BPC only to ramp up to NetWeaver 7.3 and have to migrate your BPC SP to a later version.
    Best,
    Devon Abraham

  • Why doesn't SAP use SAPUI5 for this and that

    This is my personal opinion about this topic! Again and again I stumble about this and now I want to share some of my thoughts about this topic. I want to share this from a point of view, when I was not a SAP Employee - I worked at a SAP Partner company - because this best reflects the view from the outside.
    1. SAP "wants" us to use SAPUI5
    I don't think that "wants" is the right word - the right word is offers! In terms of: hey now even included in your license and open sourced (because you wanted it so). Look - we build sooo many Fiori apps with it - and put in some great enterprise features (right to left, accessibility, translation, ...) and it is responsive. So if you want to build Fiori-like "apps" - there you go - this is your technology to go! This is what I understood.
    I was very very very happy that it was build with open standards. But the main point for me another thing - (because I worked with Sybase Unwired Platform and SAP Mobile Platform) OMG an open data protocol!!! OData FTW! I could use ANY front-end technology and consume SAP data - the protocol is REST based - a dream came true. And so I did - yes I played around with Sencha Touch and OData, I used data.js and used it in a standard HTML5 application. We played around with an iOS application we already had and consumed the data. I feed the data into d3.js. I prototyped around with SAPUI5 and I have build apps with it. Brilliant, so I could choose whatever UI technology I wanted.
    I always had the feeling, that SAPUI5 was meant for B2E applications - and building many of that - and they should look and feel the same and I can theme the apps. I can use it when I want to make my applications SAP like - so that the user thinks the apps are all the same and everything fits nicely into the Fiori launchpad - great if you want to build partner apps. In my ex company we won a SAP Pinnacle Award - for a native iOS app, no SAPUI5 in sight - but we have received an award, so SAP did not "want us" to use SAPUI5 ;-)
    2. Is it the right UI technology for everything?
    At my ex-company I was dealing with mobile applications and web apps. I always knew that I get the best user experience when I write a real native application and if you want it to look like in a very specific way with awesome UI --> you would not do it with a write-once-run-everywhere HTML5 super-styled wrapped (phone gap/cordova) app - you would write the apps for the specific platform and it should feel like it was written for the platform. SAP offered us the SAP Fiori Client that I could enhance the user experience for the Fiori apps, but I was never told to use SAPUI5 it for everything.
    The same discussion goes on with: why was the new SAP website not build with SAPUI5, or the UX Explorer (eat your own dog food), or a useful internal app - why Angular, or the other way around why do we even use SAPUI5 and not Angular JS itself. Back to the past - SAP did never tell me to build a website with it, or to build something tiny and small with it (a widget) - or to enhance parts of a website with it - or to build something super-specific with it.
    And yes maybe the UI in a mobile app was not SAPUI5 but do you know if it uses Gateway with OData or the SAP Mobile Platform, was the API managed with Apigee, was HCI involved in getting the data from different sources, was it maybe wrapped with SAP Mobile Secure, did it maybe use a HANA backend or some of its features (predictions, text analytics, ...) - are some backend parts maybe hosted on HCP - who knows? So yeah, maybe other SAP technology was involved which you don't see, but in the end it made your life simpler.
    Instead of arguing around why this and that was used for this and that - can we save our energy and instead look at the result - which is all what counts - that it was the right UI technology with the right user interface which makes the user happy? I stated something like - does Google use AngularJS for everything? Nope. They offer us something great we can use. Right, maybe AngularJS is not as important for Google like SAPUI5 is for us. But we have something with which we can build our day-to-day business apps with and we do so.
    3. We missed great opportunity in not using SAPUI5 for this and that
    Let's think about how projects are going: you want something, you look at the costs, you choose most efficient option. Yes this could mean reusing an existing native application which was written long ago and you pimped it up. Or you had outsourced it to a company which wrote a similar app. Or you bought the source code. Or you have some cheap internal staff which could do it (students, trainee), or you could outsource it cheaply. Or all you have is people with experience in this and that technology. Or it must look in a very very specific way (because marketing says so) and you go native. Or it maybe should even differentiate itself and should look NOT like a Fiori app. And no - I don't think - this is my employees view - we are not for example an event app producer. We normally build business applications. And I don't think that we can write an app from scratch "just" for an event in a certain technology. Yes it would be nice if this and that would use SAPUI5, I think if it would be possible in terms of time and costs and UI wishes and hundreds of other factors we would do it with SAPUI5.
    Working at the partner SAP showed me over 50 Fiori apps, now hundreds of Fiori apps are released. SAP now showed that SAPUI5 is going big with S/4HANA. We have seen the Simple Finance solution. I was walking around at the CeBIT this year and I was impressed myself which cool apps and screens have been shown with SAPUI5. I used the SAPUI5 app on a Samsung Smart Watch myself. The SAP Web IDE itself is built with SAPUI5 in its heart. I don't need any other "proves" that SAPUI5 is great. I have seen great use cases for it, but I also know myself when I would use other stuff.
    4. My conclusion
    There is never every anything which can cover all different use cases. One-size-fits-all clothes also does not fit for everyone even if it says so. If someone creates something great don't judge it by the UI technology. Judge it by the experience and the value it creates. There are reasons why this and that was chosen. Use what fits your needs best with your requirements. Make the end user happy!

    Hey Denise,
    Thanks for pulling this discussion into SCN. Makes it much easier to discuss compared to Twitter. But I also have to apologize in the beginning that my answer now exceeds 140 characters by 50 times.
    Let me share my thoughts and personal opinion as well. I will try to look at it from a strategic point of view, as you – as the technical UI5 expert - have already covered the technical perspective.
    SAP recommends using SAPUI5 where it fits to customers’ requirements
    Let me begin with a clear statement from my perspective: It makes no sense that SAP takes customer decisions.
    Of course, customers expect SAP to help them with their strategies and decisions and of course we are helping. But at the end, the decisions have to be taken by the customer who needs to take the specific conditions of the company into account. The most important condition in the context of UX is the end user. But we shouldn't forget the business strategy as the most important influence factor. I’m not saying that technical decisions are completely unimportant, but I would like to point out that other things are more important for a company.
    As a result, it wouldn't make a lot of sense if SAP would just want every customer to use SAPUI5. To me, customers need recommendations leading to solutions that satisfy their needs and requirements.
    There is not that one UI technology that serves all needs
    This headline might be a challenging statement and I can already imagine reactions to it. But in fact I can confirm this sentence easily. You always have to combine different technologies. Some of them are from SAP others not. The selection and combination of these technologies is different from customer to customer because the requirements are different. There are still reasons to use Web Dynpro ABAP and I’m still recommending SAP NetWeaver Business Client, POWL (Power Lists), WDA Chips, FPM based on the given environment of the customer. And obviously there are also reasons for UI5.
    SAP already proves the usage of SAPUI5
    In general, I see two different use cases here: Developing custom applications vs. adopting applications from SAP.
    In the one case, customers want recommendations on development environments and UI technologies that consider their development requirements and existing conditions (e.g. existing skills, given implementations). SAPUI5 is a great UI technology and there are some special aspects that make the decision obviously easy. If I want to create simple business applications that can be connected with my SAP system easily, especially in combination under responsive conditions on multiple devices and targeted for casual and/or occasional users UI5 might be the right choice for many.  Exactly this pattern is what many customers are searching for these days. So, the recommendation for UI5 comes quite often.
    Whether or not SAP proves the usage of SAPUI5 in their own world is to me more connected to the use case where customers want to adopt SAP applications. And in deed, SAP is using SAPUI5. There are hundreds of SAP Fiori applications that have been built with SAPUI5 and there have been a lot of other applications developed using SAPUI5, too. And again, there is a huge need for applications for casual and/or occasional users, so that’s a big reason for SAP to create such applications.
    Websites vs. Business Applications
    This discussion was triggered by some statements in twitter, that SAP sites such as sap.com, SAP UX Explorer or the latest mobile conference app are not developed using UI5. Actually I see these to be websites but not business applications. I have never told a customer to build a website in UI5 and I would continue to do so.
    Maybe we need to discuss the difference between a website and a business application. I guess it is not easy to find a common understanding here, as the borderlines between several worlds have disappeared in the last years.
    Some years ago it was more or less easy to differ between:
    Native desktop applications running on a specific desktop OS
    Native mobile applications running on a specific mobile OS
    Browser-based applications running in specific browsers
    Websites, basically running on many browsers
    In the first three categories we saw business applications. 1 and 2 were selected especially when specific functions of the device and OS where needed to be accessed (for example the camera of the mobile device, the fast rendering capability of the desktop). 3 was also used for business applications but in most cases on desktop browsers.
    Today, one can develop browser-based applications that look like native applications and even can access the devices like native applications. Responsive design breaks the borderlines even more. Now, browser-based content can be rendered perfectly on a desktop browser as well as on a mobile phone and a user might even not be able to judge whether it was originally intended to be developed for the one or the other.
    So maybe there is no big difference anymore between websites and browser-based applications. But there is still a difference between browser-based applications and browser-based business applications, where additional requirements such as integration into business systems are drivers. Here I see SAPUI5 as a very cool UI technology.
    That’s just my 2 (personal) cents,
    JJ

Maybe you are looking for