SAP GR/IR discrepancies

Hi SAP GURU,
Can anyone help me on the following issue:
My Client receive 7680 pieces, and the P.O. Said 7500 Pieces. The issue is the received quantity vs the invoiced quantity. The discrepancy is a GR / IR and is showing up on the GR / IR report. This happens when the invoice is entered into the system before the goods receipt. It's shows up as though there is a quantity issue on the GRIR report. I hope this helps make the situation more clear.
Thanks
Shoeb Kanpurwala

Check the Print version which you assigned in T-code OMBR, change it as per your requriment.

Similar Messages

Transfer Order: discrepancies between GI and GR management

Hi everybody!
I'll appriciate your suggest to manage this critical scenarios:
Transfer Order from Pant A to Plant B (both the plants belong to the same company)
Case 1:
for an item GI qty is major than GE qty
For an item GI qty is less then GE qty
Case 2:
for an item the material code entered into STO and into Delivery and so registered at GI moment, is different from that effectively delivered and received at receiving plant.
Which are the necessary material documents that have to be created and so the necessary stock adjustements that have to be executed in order to solve every one discrepancies above described?
Many thanks
Roberta

Many thanks for the answers;
I'll try to explain better than before the scenarios
Case 1:
for an item GI qty is major than GE qty
--> do an addition Goods receipt for the remaining in-transit quantity.
alternative cancel the goods receipt, cancel the goods issue, redo the case with correct quantities
The case is that in the Delivery created against the STO the GI qty registered is major than that effectively receipt from the receipt plant; If I cancel the movements I've not traces if the discrepancies happened
For an item GI qty is less then GE qty
--> how can this be possible? anyhow, cancel the goods receipt and post it with the correct quantity.
alternative : cancel the goods receipt, cancel the goods issue, redo the case with correct quantities
The case is that in the Delivery created against the STO the GI qty registered is less than that effectively receipt from the receipt plant ( the whareauser has made a mistake during the picking activity); If I cancel the movements I've not traces if the discrepancies happened
Case 2:
for an item the material code entered into STO and into Delivery and so registered at GI moment, is different from that effectively delivered and received at receiving plant.
cancel the goods receipt, cancel the goods issue, redo in SAP with material that you shipped physically.
If I cancel the movements I've not traces if the discrepancies happened

Identifying Changed Dates on Documents in SAP B1

Greetingsu2026I have an unusual request that is somewhat long, very serious, and hope folks can help.
A headquarters customer believes a subsidiary company has u2018made upu2019 dates on invoices for previous billings. They describe the date changes as u2018radicalu2019 but I have not personally seen these invoices as of yet and am waiting a FAX. They requested I go into SAP B1 to see if someone has fabricated or made up or changed invoice dates and who it was. They have some specific large-dollar invoices identified to research. The person under suspect (who is no longer there) was considered an expert in SAP B1, so maybe she knew all of the different ways to change dates around. Being an expert means also she might have used some unusual ways to change dates to the ones she wanted.
Here are some of my ideas to discover this situation, but I hope someone can suggest even more steps because I would like to know every way that this situation can be discovered.
1. Open the AR Invoices and use Data > Change Log and concentrate on dates.
2. Run some SQL to validate document dates and system dates. SELECT T0.DocNum, T0.DocDate, T0.CreateDate, T0.TaxDate, T0.UpdateDate FROM OINV T0 WHERE (T0.DocDate does not equal T0.CreateDate OR T0.TaxDate does not equal T0.CreateDate). The results would show invoices that maybe had their dates changed.
3.Run a Document Journal in the Financial Module. Finance > Financial Reports > Accounting > Document Journal with the u2018Expanded Selectionu2019 of AR Invoices and a date range covering the invoices in question. Then see if the Transaction Numbers are out of sequence.
4. Run a Transaction Journal Report Financials > Financial Reports > Accounting > Transaction Journal Report with AR Invoices. Compare this report to Document Journal.
5. Run the Utilities functions of Utilities > Check Document Numbering to see if there any anomalies there in the document numbers.
6. Run the Administration > System Initialization > Document Numbering function to see if a special series has been set up.
7. Check out the AR Invoice numbering order by running another simple SQL covering a range of the invoices in question. SELECT T0.DocNum, T0.TaxDate, T0.CreateDate, T0.UpdateDate FROM OINV T0 WHERE T0.DocNum > 1583 AND T0.DocNum < 3251 ORDER BY T0.CreateDate. Then see if the AR Invoice Numbering Sequence is not consistent.
8. Check out those documents that are connected to each suspect AR Invoice and their associated dates by using the Target and Base Document icons. For example, if a Deliver Document has dates of January 2007 but the AR Invoice date is September 2006, then someone has played around with dates on at least one of the documents.
9. Get copies of the complete company database before the alleged changes were made and a company database as of today and compare the two contents. Only good if the backups are maintained for a long time.
Here come the questions on the ways I BELIEVE dates can be changed but not sure how to find and need to work on them:
QUESTION 1 u2013 If a person DTWs invoices up into SAP B1, how can I tell that DTW was used to change the dates, the date of the DTW run, and the dates that were changed?
QUESTION 2 u2013 If a person uses SQL to update dates on SAP B1, how can I find out that SQL has been used, the date of the SQL run, and the dates that were changed?
QUESTION 3 u2013 If a person goes out and changes the workstation and/or server Date and Timestamp Properties, how can I find that they did that and the date changes? You can do this on your PC by just changing the month, date, and year in Microsoftu2019s Date and Timestamp Properties.
QUESTION 4 u2013 I know SAP has a policy that no SQL can be used to update databases and/or tables and have been told some customers lost support because they did this. What does SAP do to discover this in their lab?
QUESTION 5 u2013 Are there any notes in the portals to help me find changed dates?
QUESTION 6 u2013 Are there any logs SAP B1 produces that can help identify such changes and how do I find and use them?
QUESTION 7 (and this is big) u2013 Are the other ways dates can be changed on AR Invoices and how would I uncover the way it was done and the needed information of Original Date and Changed Date?
Many, many thanks for any help provided since this is a serious situation. If you can make any suggestions it would be greatly appreciatedu2026
Zal
Edited by: Zal Parchem on Mar 13, 2009 7:31 AM

Hi Zal
If this person was an "Expert" on SAP Business One then the only way they would have changed dates would probably be directly in SQL itself. The best way to determine this would be to hope that they slipped up somewhere and forgot to change a particular date in let's say one specific table.
For invoices, start with the post date, doc date & create date. Then check each of these to the OJDT/JDT1 tables for any discrepancies. Next check the ADOC/ADO1 table for multiple instances on the invoice. If only 1 instance then check the create date, time & user as well as the aforementioned dates between OINV/INV1 & ADOC/ADO1. If multiple instances, check the dates from 1 instance to the next (This will indicate dates being changed in the system).
Next check the same dates against OINM table. If any of the dates do not tally then the SQL was changed directly.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you need further assistance.
Kind regards
Peter Juby

ICSS: authorization in SAP CRM 7.0

Hello Experts,
Is it possible to restrict via authorization acces to diffrent types of transaction in ICSS in SAP CRM 7.0? For example some clients can have acces to complaints, some to service request and some for both.
Regards
Piotr

Of course, you can. If you are creating the Z: roles for SAP_CRM_ECO_ISE_WU_B2B, then in this role, in the CRM Component, there is an authorization object called CRM_ORD_PR and a field name PR_TYPE. You can go an change the individual users with access to different transaction types or create Z: object or Z:role for each group as you wish. Use the field name ACTVT to control the access to the transaction type.
Please note, there may still be some discrepancies in the search selection in the ICSS. Though you may want to restrict the user to not to access "Complaints", the restriction may work at the transaction level, but not at the search level. You may still see "Complaint" object in the Search dropdown list. I am not sure if SAP has covered all the features of ICSS to abide by this role.

Syncing UST10S and UST12 tables in SAP ECC 6.0

Hi there,
I am currently experiencing some discrepancies between the UST10S table containing authorizations assigned to profiles to the table UST12.
I have heard that UST tables in SAP have been known to get out of sync and become inaccurate, and there is a way to sync them to the USR tables. Is there such a method for ECC 6.0?

Start transaction SUIM_OLD. Wait about 5 to 60 seconds.Then the tables are synced. Then you can use SUIM.
Inconsistencies should however seldom occur anymore.
Cheers,
Julius

Segmentation in SAP B1 - comparison of segment-wise financial results

Dear Group,
We are in a trading industry using SAP B1 at our 15 outlets.. we have created 15 segments in SAP B1 to know the actual performance of each segment.
i would like to know how to get comparison analysis of segments in sap b1.. As p&l , b/s allow to choose only one segment. We can get the report of the selected segment at a time but we can not choose more than one segment to compare the results for analysis purpose..

Hi Zal
If this person was an "Expert" on SAP Business One then the only way they would have changed dates would probably be directly in SQL itself. The best way to determine this would be to hope that they slipped up somewhere and forgot to change a particular date in let's say one specific table.
For invoices, start with the post date, doc date & create date. Then check each of these to the OJDT/JDT1 tables for any discrepancies. Next check the ADOC/ADO1 table for multiple instances on the invoice. If only 1 instance then check the create date, time & user as well as the aforementioned dates between OINV/INV1 & ADOC/ADO1. If multiple instances, check the dates from 1 instance to the next (This will indicate dates being changed in the system).
Next check the same dates against OINM table. If any of the dates do not tally then the SQL was changed directly.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you need further assistance.
Kind regards
Peter Juby

Sending Master data - differentiate full and discrepancies

Hi experts,
we need to send master data from SAP, and for materials and customers data, we have the following requirement :
- send full data to some legacies
- send discrepancies to others.
Is there a way to handle that in PI or with partner profiles or maybe by creating 2 different ports ?
Thanks a lot in advance for your help,
Jamal

Hi Boom,
How do you whether its a master data or discrepancy data? Is there any field which differentiates? If yes then you can use couple of receivers in your receiver determination. So write a xpath conditon to find which data it is and then trigger the appropriate receiver. So which ever condition is satisfied it triggers the corresopnding receiver which should take care of the issue you are facing.
Regards,
---Satish

Correcting discrepancies after order confirmation and put away.

Hi, I was just wondering if there is a way to correct overages and shortages after a delivery has been received and put away. As we are very new to SAP, during a plant to plant inventory transfer, we made the mistake of confirming eight delivery orders in spite of the the fact that there were several discrepancies such as overages and shortages on several Item #'s. We have documented all the discrepancies and would now like to go into the system to make the adjustments. Is there a simple way to do this? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

Hi,
One best way to adjust the overage and shortage of materials afterputaway is doing PHYSICAL INVENTORY.You can post the differences according to the overage and shortages of the material. I hope this will clear your issue. Thanking you.

MD04 / VA33 discrepancies

Hello,
We are facing a lot of discrepancies between MD04 and VA33 in our company.
Is it possible to have a simple explanation about this ?
Do someone can send me some SAP documents about this.
Thanks a lot.
Romeo.

Romeo,
Looks like you already got your answer. Here is the main OSS note
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/25444
Also read the associated notes. Great bedtime reading.
Rgds,
DB49

SAP message Log

Does SAP maintain log of all the messages displayed on screen using MESSAGE statement?
We are investigating a problem and want to see the messages displayed by SAP during the time when problem occured.

We have custom development for picking and confirmation. Last week we found that in some deliveries there is difference in delivered quantity and packed quantity.
Custom development is calling sap-standard FMs. Problem occurs randomly, roughly 10 deliveries in a week has this problem.
We are still trying to investigate the reason that is causing the problem.
Custom program does display the message to user if FM raise any message. We asked user of they are getting any message while picking, and if they are ignoring it.
They just confirmed that they are getting message 'Packing Not Possible Since there is no Quantity to be Packed' and they did ignored this.

Rendering xml-table into logical filename in SAP R/3

Hi,
I am trying to translate an xml-table with bytes into a logical filepath in SAP R3.
Do I have to use the method gui-download or shall I loop the internal xml-table?
When I tried to loop the xml-table into a structure, and then transfering the structure into the logical filename, I get problems with the line breaks in my xml-file. How do I get the lines to break exactly the same as I wrote them in my ABAP-code?
Edited by: Kristina Hellberg on Jan 10, 2008 4:24 PM

I believe you posted in the wrong forum.
This forum is dedicated to development and deployment of .Net applications that connect and interact with BusinessObjects Enterprise, BusinessObjects Edge, or Crystal Reports Server. This includes the development of applications using the BusinessObjects Enterprise, Report Application Server, Report Engine, and Web Services SDKs.
Ludek

Manual de Integracao v300-2009-03-16 - SAP 4.7 SP30 preparado para NF-e?

Boa tarde,
Estou iniciando um projeto de implementação de MP135 + NF-e + SPED na versão 4.7 do SAP, este ambiente encontra-se atualizado com o SP30.
Gostaria de saber se é possível configurar a NF-e com base no novo layout definido no "novo" manual de integração do contribuinte (emitido em 16/03/2009) versão 3.00, a versão 4.7 com SP30 está preparada?
Como estamos iniciando a fase de blueprint, foi colocado por parte do cliente o interesse de implementação da NF-e com esta nova versão, permitindo desde já que a empresa emita NF-e já novo layout definido.
Desde já agradeço pela atenção,
Att,
André Teixeira

Bom dia André,
O projeto NF-e no R/3 4.7 tem como prerequisito mínimo o SP 30, conforme SAP Note 989115. Então você está tranquilo quanto a isso. Faça uma busca em XX-CSC-BR-NFE no market place filtrando este support package para obter a lista de notas que deverá aplicar em seu ambiente.
Fiz uma rápida análise no manual 3.0 e concluí que as principais modificações são relacionadas ao DANFE, que no manual 3.0 diserta sobre a possibilidade de impressão em formulário contínuo e também a diferença do DANFE em contingência. O novo manual aproveita para documentar novas rejeições, novos retornos de protocolo (adicionando valores para o SCAN/DPEC), e o consulta de cadastro de emissor (atualmente sem suporte).
O layout utilizado continuará sendo o 1.10, com mínimas modificações no domínio de alguns campos (ex.: bairro exige hj de 1 a 60 caracteres, está mudando para 2 a 60 caracteres).
Respondendo sua pergunta, a solução SAP/GRC pode emitir NF-e conforme este novo manual pois o layout 1.10 já é suportado, regras de validação deverão ser atualizadas no GRC para evitar falha de schema (215/225) na Sefaz.
Atenciosamente,
Fernando Da Ros

Perfis de Usuários do SAP R/3, GRC e PI

Pessoal,
Estou iniciando um projeto de NF-e (com B2B) em um novo cliente e estão solicitando todos os perfis de usuários para criação dos mesmos, alguém já passou por isso e poderia ajudar? basicamento serão para os usuários:
- De Comunicação entre R/3 e o GRC
- De Comunicação entre o GRC e o R/3
- De Comunicação entre o GRC e o PI
- De Comunicação entre o PI e o GRC
- Usuários que utilizarão o Monitor Web do GRC.
No aguardo, obrigado.
Danilo

Para os usuarios de comunicacao, verifique o item 3.3.5. Communication User Details desse link: SAP GRC NFE 1.0 - New Solution Introduction & Implemention Best Practices
Com relacao aos usuarios dos monitores, vc pode filtrar o acesso (que notas eles conseguem ver) pelo CNPJ.
Para isso, crie uma role Z como copia da /XNFE/TAXNUMBER e nessa role Z, coloque o numero do CNPJ do emissor (filial ou matriz) das notas que esse usuario pode ver no activity respecitvo.
Att,
Henrique.

Inutilização de uma nfe com mensageria não sap

Prezados Colegas,
Gostaria de solicitar uma preciosa ajuda de vocês.
Estou em um projeto de implementação, utilizando a solução SAP para NF-e, porém com uma mensageria NÃO-SAP que o cliente já utiliza hoje.
Preciso entender como funciona o seguinte cenário:
Foi emitida uma NF-e no ERP SAP e enviada para a Mensageria. Por algum problema na SEFAZ não houve uma resposta para a mensageria e neste intervalo o faturista vê que tinha erro na NF-e e resolve cancelar a nota.
No monitor de NF-e a nota está com estes parâmetros:
Status Ação : engrenagem
Etapa do Processo: em processamento
Status do Documento: Aguardar resposta
Status de Com. Sistema: Enviado ao Sistema de Envio de mensagens
Como devo proceder para cancelar esta nota e solicitar inutilização na SEFAZ ? A NF-e tem uma chave de acesso, a Inutilização vai gerar uma outra chave correto?, e na volta está chave (da inutilização) ficará gravada na tabela, e no Livro de Saídas aparecerá como inutilizada ?
Confirmem se são estes os passos que tenho que seguir:
No monitor, seleciono a nota e faço um ESTORNO ANTES DA AUTORIZAÇÃO; em seguida ESTORNAR DOCUMENTO DE ORIGEM, e depois eu clico em ENVIAR (ESTA É A SOLICITAÇÃO DE INUTILIZAÇÃO ?)
E pelo fato de ser outra mensageria, tem alguma implicação diferente, algo que eventualmente não funcione na atualização do SAP ?
Antecipadamente agradeço,
Diógenes

Fernando,
Eu vou reformular minha questão, porque acredito que misturei o cenário que o cliente comentou que existe hoje e como isto se daria no SAP, com o que realmente eu preciso saber que é a Inutilização de uma nota fiscal.
Então o cenário seria este:
O usuário criou uma nota, e se deu conta que criou errada e precisa cancelá-la, a nota foi para a mensageria, porém esta (a mensageria) por algum motivo, alguma falha na SEFAZ, o ambiente estava fora, algo parecido, ainda não tinha recebido resposta para a nota, se foi autorizada ou rejeitada, consequentemente o monitor de NF-e no SAP não foi atualizado, para esta nota na coluna Status da Ação, continua aparecendo a "engrenagem".
Para que o usuário cancele esta nota no SAP e na sequencia peça a inutilização, tudo isso levando-se em conta que não obtivemos a resposta da SEFAZ, a sequencia de passos que ele tem que fazer é esta que coloco abaixo ? :
1 - No monitor, seleciona a NF-e
2 - Escolhe "Estorno antes da Autorização"
3 - Na coluna ETAPA aparece a atividade "2"
4 - Escolho "Estornar documento de Origem"
5 - Enviar NF-e as Autoridades Fiscais
E levando-se em conta que a SEFAZ não respondeu da 1a vez, que a nota não consta na base de dados dela, então a SEFAZ deve aprovar a inutilização.
Pelo fato de ser uma outra mensageria, o processo acontece normalmente, não há nenhum desenvolvimento a ser feito do lado do ERP SAP para que esta situação seja atendida, a saída da solicitação de inutilização é feita normalmente pela função J_1B_NFE_XML_OUT, e no nosso caso aqui temos o PI como middleware que envia os dados para a mensageria NÃO - SAP. Nós já fizemos o desenvolvimento para atender a Inutilização quando se tratar do gap de numeração, em que usamos o programa J_1BNFECHECKNUMBERRANGES.
Desculpe, se não fui muito claro anteriormente.
Atenciosamente,
Diógenes

Alteração dos layout's de impressão padrão do SAP B1

Pessoal, bom dia.
Gostaria de saber como faço para incluir um novo dado em um layout padrão do SAP B1, por exemplo: Fluxo de Caixa.
Toda vez que tento incluir ou alterar qualquer campo o layout traz informações que não tem nada a ver ou repete em todas as linhas.
Eu queria alterar por exemplo, no Fluxo de Caixa, que ele traga o Nome do PN e não o código do PN.
Agradeço desde já.
Abraços,
Antonio Melo

Danilo,
A questão é que os campos demonstrados no layout de impressão do fluxo de caixa não demonstram de quais tabelas sao os campos.
Criei um novo campo e o relacionei ao campo Código do PN. Ele me trouxe como resultado o nome do meu primeiro PN cadastrado no sistema para todas as linhas, ou seja, trouxe errado.
Continuo na mesma.
Abs,
Melo

SAP GR/IR discrepancies

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for