SAP HR Org. Structure excluded from integration to SRM

We have not set up the automatic integration of HR org changes into SRM organization (report RBDMIDOC, message type: HRMD_ABA).
In SAP HR some new org units with its positions and employees will be assigned.
We would like to exclude this new part of HR Organization Structure from
integration to SRM. In the transaction BD64 we can filtrer object type,
subtype, infotype and relationship but this is not sufficient for us.
¿How could we exclude from copying to SRM a whole part of the organizatonal tree, for example excluding a root org. unit (one ID) and all its dependets org. units (evaluation path)?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards.

Hi Malgorzata Kaminska,
We had similar kind of requirement which we could acheive with
01)  Write a custom program which calls the standard SAP T-code PFAL or (RHALEINI)
02)  In the Exit R/3 outbound IDOCs, filter the PERNRs to exclude the list you do not want to.  If the list is static, you can maintain in a custom table one time and in the outbound idoc exit, check an entry exists in the table and exclude the PERNRs.  If the PERNRs are dynamic, then when the PERNR gets created, write another exit to populate in this custom table for PERNRs exclusion.
03)  The custom program of point 01) will pick all the necessary PERNRs for replication and submit in the PFAL as select single.
04)  The variant in the PFAL can have an evaluation path as P-S-O and executed under update mode.
Hope this helps!!!
DV

Similar Messages

  • Questions regarding HR Org Structure replication from ECC to SRM

    Hi Experts ,
    We have SRM7.0 ( SP08) with ECC6 ( Ehp4) having Classic Scenario .
    I managed to replicate entire  HR Org Structure  from ECC system to SRM system.  I replicated O (Organization), S( Postion) and P ( Person), which successfully created O, S and CP in SRM with BP for O and US...Refered Note 934372, 312090, 550055 and help link on SDN./wiki.....etc
    Now I have below questions in mind.
    1. In SRM we requiers Org unit for Company Code, Purchase Organization and Purchase Group...which we set  in FUNCTION tab for the requiered Org Unit with Checkbox and value of it and Logical system.....but in HR Org strcuture we do not have such Org Unit....so how to manage/create such these Org Units ( i.e.Company Code, Purchase Organization and Purchase Group ) ?...
    Do I need to create these Org unit manually in SRM in PPOSA_BBP ? If yes, can I create these Org Unit above or between these replicated HR Org Units  or I need to created it separtly in paralllel to these HR replicated Org Units?
    2. If above I do, then what will impact on the delta /change replication from HR integraion ?
    3. In ECC HR org Structure there are hundres of employee, out of that I just wanted to send the Postion ( we have postion based security  in HR) whom only SRM Role had assigned . How it can be acheived ?
    Will appricaite detail reply/suggestions
    Thanks
    NAP

    Hi ,
    Initially when I repliacted P of HR Org Struture it sucessfully craeted BP in SRM  and was CP in Org Structure.
    But suddenly , what happned don;t know, when I replicating Employees (P) in SRM , it is assigning  to respective Postion (S), but BP is not creating in SRM  and in the USERS_GEN  for this User, its postion and ORg Unit to whom it assigned is giving  below error
    Determination of connections to object 'BP' of 'CP' '00000015' failed
    Message no. BBP_UM_UI036
    I checked all this as per Note 550055, 934372..etc....checked respetcive setting in table T77S0...I checked address alos....but no any clue......IDoC in SRM posting sucessfully....
    Can anyone please suggest what should be the cause and solution of it ?
    Thanks
    NAP

  • Org Structure download from HR and Uploading into SRM

    Dear All
    We have SRM 7.0 and ECC 5.0.
    We are trying to load ORG structure data from SAP-HR into SRM. These 2 systems are not connected and we can't use the ALE synchronously. Can we download the HR org structure - ALE Distribution- iDoc into a file from the SAP-HR  System and then upload the same into SRM, to create the entire Org structure? Pl provide your inputs.
    Thanks in advance
    velu

    Hello,
    Did you use any evaluation path to capture org structure when download the file using PFAL program.
    We are looking to capture O,S,C objects ie HRP1000 objects as first step.
    We are looking to capture all relationship belonging to that ORG unit ie HR1001 relationship as second step.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks.

  • What sap fi org structure . and co org structure .

    what sap fi org structure . and co org structure .

    hi subhash....
    FI structure is 
    <b>Client</b>-><b>Controlling Area</b>><b>Company Code</b>--><b>Business area.</b>..
    The Co organization structure is
    <b>
    <b>Operating concern</b> [/b><b>- Controlling area </b>> <b>Comapny code</b>--><b> Cost center
    </b>
    Thanks & Regards
    ranjit
    null

  • SRM Org Structure Replication From HR

    Dear All,
    We are in the process of Integrating the HR org into SRM.
    1) Done the ALE settings.
    2) Model view for message type HRMD_ABA created and distubuted, created from the template.
    3) Basic settings done in T770s in SRM table.
    4) Executed PFAL to push the objects.
    5) Idocs generated in the SRM to create only Org units and positiosn,But  CP and users are not created.
    Outcome:
    Org units and positions are transferred to the SRM, but the CP and User assignment not done in SRM.
    HRALS-USRAC = X. Not sure why the CP and USer is not assigned.
    With this setiings I think we need not create users in SAP, as the user info from HRinfo type 0105 , Stype 00001 should be copied on to create CP in SRM
    We are in SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0.
    Pls advise.
    Regards
    Harish

    Dear Customer,
    This inquiry would really fall under the BC-BMT-OM-ALE component. It might be best to open a thread under this component.
    Information i have found for you on this is as follows. I hope it might help you a bit.
    This issue occurs because the intial distribution has not been done
    correctly. Please review the way to distribute HR datas :
    1- Using transaction PFAL, sending the objects C, O, S successively in
       Update mode with the infotypes 1000, 1002 and 1028 only, without
       using evaluation paths (all existing objects).
       => The objects will then be created without relationship, and no
       error must be reported.
    2- Using transaction PFAL, sending the object P in Update mode.
       => As the structure objects are already present, no error message
       must be generated. If some are, please analyse them, and correct them
       before the next step.
    3- Using transaction PFAL, sending the objects C, O, S successively in
       Update mode (without restrictions, or only the infotype 1001).
       => The relationships which were not sent in step 1 are then
       distributed.
    4- The changes pointers can now be activated and processed, as the
       initialization has been done (steps 1 to 3).
    Hope it helps,
    Kind Regards,
    Edel.

  • "best practice to maintain the SAP OM Org Structure"

    Hi SAP Experts,
    My client want to have an best practice or an safe process to update, better and maintain their existing SAP HCM Organizational Structure. In one way you can say that i am doing an process oriented job.
    Our client system is not up-to-date due to the lack of user awareness and complete knowledge on the system. Due to this they are unsure on the accuracy of the reports that comes out of the system.
    As a HCM functional consultant i can look from the technical perspective but not on this process oriented role. I need your guidance in this regard, please sugguest me how can i move ahead and make  some really valuable recommendations ? I am confused on where to start and how to start. Please help me in this regard.
    Thanks in advance,
    Amar

    The only thing u need to keep in mind the Relatioships between the objects in OM
    check the Tcode OOVK  for relationships and assigning those objects   PP01 , PP02
    Re: Organization Structure
    this thread may help u
    let us know if there is anything else
    Edited by: Sikindar on Dec 4, 2008 9:36 AM

  • SAP EBP: ORG structure copy process

    Hi,
    I want to copy existing Org structure of production client in Development Client and vice versa .
    Pls explain Steps to be followed
    Thanks
    Amit

    Hello Sir ,
    Thanks for your reply.
    See in my scenario the production Org structure is already in place .I have created Org structure in Development
    for pilot test purpose and want to replicate the same in production.
    There are alredy so many linkage for existing purchase org(which is not in use) but i dont want to disturb those.
    let me know the way out pls.
    Thanks& Regards
    Amit

  • Distributing SAP HR Org structure to SRM

    Has anybody distributed HR Org data to SRM. We are using IDOC HRMD_ABA throgh PFAL but in the SRM system most of the IDOCS are failing because they are not loaded in the right sequence. Does anybody have any idea of how it should be loaded?

    Hi Malgorzata Kaminska,
    We had similar kind of requirement which we could acheive with
    01)  Write a custom program which calls the standard SAP T-code PFAL or (RHALEINI)
    02)  In the Exit R/3 outbound IDOCs, filter the PERNRs to exclude the list you do not want to.  If the list is static, you can maintain in a custom table one time and in the outbound idoc exit, check an entry exists in the table and exclude the PERNRs.  If the PERNRs are dynamic, then when the PERNR gets created, write another exit to populate in this custom table for PERNRs exclusion.
    03)  The custom program of point 01) will pick all the necessary PERNRs for replication and submit in the PFAL as select single.
    04)  The variant in the PFAL can have an evaluation path as P-S-O and executed under update mode.
    Hope this helps!!!
    DV

  • SAP MM Org structure

    Hi,
    Is it mandatory to create Purchasing Groups in SAP MM.
    Also how to assign the user to respective groups in case we want to restrict thm from buying certain product groups.
    Is Pgrp assigned to Porg in anyways.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Purchase Group is an Independent Organization Unit which do not have any intervention with other.
    You can use the purchase group to take advantages like
    Reports and Analysis based on Purchase group
    You have standard match code in SAP to search by purchase group (any master data, Documents and etc)
    Even have better control of what you are buying and who is responsible for the purchase
    You can have approval process of PR & PO and other purchasing document based on Purchasing group
    You can have notification process by the Purchase group
    If you do not want to have these advances or not required then yes you do not need to create purchase group at all, you can change the field selection to your document as suppress or optional
    Thanks
    Siva

  • Comparison of two structures excluding one field

    Hi,
    I need to make comparisons of two complete data structures, excluding from the comparison one field that should not be compared or considered to obtain a result of equality of both structures.
    Somebody know a sentence or practical way to make this comparison (with one field less)?
    Example:
    DATA: im_data_new TYPE mereq_item,
                im_data_old TYPE mereq_item.
    Both structures has 146 fields, and I need to exclude from the comparison the 64th field.
    Thanks in advance and greetings,
    Mayra.

    clear that field value in old and new before comparing the structures.
    Thomas

  • Operation Issues after switching to Org.Struc. replication from HR ? :-(

    Hi guys,
    Currently I have my Org.Structure created manually, however some guys are working in the ALE model in order to replicate Org.Struc. data from HR to SRM.
    MY QUESTION IS: my new Org. Structure will have different ID's. 
    - What will happen with my current operation?  I can see that all my SC and PO documents are linked to the "old" struc. ID's.     
    - What should I do in order to minimize the issues during this transition ?
    Thanks for your help !
    Best regards,
    Diego

    Hi guys,
    Thanks for your help.
    First of all: YES I need to accomplish this in my Productive Environment.
    Second: I have 1800 end users approx. right now, so it would be difficult to ask them to finish the approvals by themselves =(
    Third: my biggest concern was related to the Purchaser workload, I have seen in BBP_PD that a PO document has a Purch.Org and Purch.Group linked (OU Id's).     With my new Org.Structure this ID's will be a different ones !    How could I solve this ?
    Thank so much for your help !
    Best regards !
    Diego

  • What is the basic difference between MM and SRM org structure

    Hi
    All,
    What is the difference between MM org structure and SRM org structure?
    to my understanding SRM org structure deals with BP concepts where as MM don't, please correct me if I am wrong
    please give your inputs
    Regards,
    Srinivas

    Hello Srinivas,
    what do you call MM organizational structure? Which ECC transaction do you launch to access it?
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Asset exclusion is selected though it is excluded in the org. structure.

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We are working on a Standalone scenario (SRM 4.0) where we have assets and asset classes.
    In our org. structure we have excluded two asset classes with the exclusion indicator to the corresponding attributes of the purchasing organisation.( Asset class - ANK). But when we create a SC all the assets are selected in the Item details --> Cost assignment ---> dragdown (asset).
    From our case it seems there is no effect of the exclusion indicator/ we made something wrong somewhere.
    Can we get few suggestions/sap notes from the group that what went wrong?
    Thnx. & Reg.,
    Sridhar.

    Hi Mani,
      Thanks a lot for your reply.
    If the exclusion indicator is maintained at user level also it is not working.( all
    assets are selected from the list and there is no difference between the others)
    May I get any further suggestions on this issue pls.
    Thx. & reg.,
    Sridhar.

  • Integrate the Org structure and employees SAP HR system to CRM via ALE

    Hi All,
    We want to integrate the organization structure and employees from mySAP HR system to mySAP CRM system. We are also aware that the same can be achieved through ALE Interface between both these systems.
    In addition to the HR Organization Structure from HR system, can we also bring over the Sales Organization Structure from R/3 using transaction CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE?
    1) Can someone , please let us the possible challenges which might occur when we download HR Org structure from SAP HR to SAP CRM.?
    2) What is the implication of maintaining an HR org structure and CRM Sales Org structure within the SAP CRM 52 system?
    3) Any _precautions) should we take before doing the download via ALE??
    Please get back, suitable points will be awarded.
    Regards
    Ritvij

    Hi Ritvij,
    Couple of things that spring to mind are:
    1) When you do the initial data load (PFAL) try to ensure that no one is amending the Org structure as Objects can be locked and therefore not transferred. (on one of our test loads the top level was locked and therfore all subsequent levels were just transfered and we didn't have a top level)
    2) Keep the 'forms of address' in CRM the same as the R/3 ones
    3) Keep the same Employee and Org Unit IDs but prefix with (for exmaple) EM and OU in CRM. (Through the HR integration config in CRM). This may also (apparantley) aid you if set up something like an Employee interaction centre in the future.
    I will update when other stuff springs to mind.
    Cheers
    Gaz

  • Short Dump while copying Org structure from ERP to CRM

    Hello Experts:
    We are trying to copy the Org structure from ECC to CRM.
    We have a standard transaction 'CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE' to copy the the org structure from ECC or the IMG path:
    SPRO->CRM->Master Data->Organization Management->Data Transfer->Coppy ECC Sales Structure
    We have a multiple assignment scenario where each sales groups are assigned to multiple sales offices and likewise,each sales office is assigned to multiple sales org unit in ECC.
    This can be achieved by turning on the enhanced version.
    In our current business,even though the sales offices and groups are created,but are not having relavance in the business,hence while running in the sandbox system, we ran the program to copy the structures in the standard mode(default) and we could copy it without issues and create the org units for every entity in CRM based on how the number ranges are defined.
    What happens when enhanced version switch is turned on ::
    While we turn the mode to enhanced version, The system automatically::
    - enhances the Function tab page in the ppoma_crm  transaction to include a grid table, in which you maintain multiple assignments of organizational units
    - generates an extra dialog box to the Organization tab page in business transactions for you to select the relevant assignment path for the organizational unit
    - adapts the consistency check in business transactions to take into account organizational units that have been multiple assigned
    Risk factor :
    Once you have switched to the enhanced backend integration version of the organizational model you cannot return to the standard backend integration version. The system will also automatically make changes to the organizational model version in CRM Mobile Sales.
    Also this structure will happen across all the clients in the system,so unfortunately cannot try in a sandbox client also of the new environment.
    We are building our development box,so while running the above step in standard mode,the program gives a short dump due to long execution time even though we have the same amount of data as in our prototype system.
    Also, we increased the idle time value to a very high value.
    When I approached SAP OSS,I was told that it is due to the multiple assignment scenario,hence we need to switch to enhanced version in CRM before we run the copy program ( CRMC_ORG_R3_GENERATE )
    I am not quite sure if the mismatch of the scenarios between CRM and ECC could be causing this short dump as we could run it in standard mode in our prototype/sandbox environment without issues even  with the same data volume as in the new development system .
    I am looking for help from all the experts if they have come across similar issue and your recommendations/feedback if this can be corrected.
    Appreciate your guidance/recommendation on this issue.
    thanks!!

    In CRM Best Practices Building block C05 is the step by step description how to replicate Org. structure and some of employee's master data.
    Follow link - http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv12007/CRM_DE/BBLibrary/html/C05_EN_DE.htm

Maybe you are looking for

  • Any limit on the size of SATA disks used with X2100's (not M2's)?

    We've got an x2100 coming in (not an M2), and I need to outfit it with a couple of drives. The newer "green" Western Digital 1TB drives @ $130 a piece look pretty appealing. Is there any reason why drives that large wouldn't work in the x2100?

  • Install Air App for All Users

    Does air have an option to install the app across all users , not jus the current user?

  • Help with BufferedImage and JPanel

    I have a program that should display some curves, but thats not the problem, the real problem is when i copy the image contained in the JPanel to the buffered image then i draw something there and draw it back to the JPanel. My panel initialy its whi

  • Pproblem with main

    Cant work out why my main method has a problem // SimpleInternalFrame.java // A quick demonstration of setting up an internal frame in an application. import java.awt.*; import java.awt.event.*; import javax.swing.*; //make main window public class H

  • Performance issue with IOT

    Oracle version 11.1.0.6.0 I have an IOT with primary key DEAL_BUCKET_ID (number) and DATETIME (date). When I run a query which returns approx. 1.5 million rows I observe a huge amount of logical IOs as well as huge wait times for "db file sequential