SAP Note 1438667 - WT for T4A redesign has incorrect valuation bases

Hi,
SAP made changes to the valuation bases in WT /179 through note 1438667, the note aims to create Inflow/Outflow wagetypes /I79 and /O79 for /179 wagetypes instead of the earlier Inflow/Outflow wagetypes /I04 and O04.
For those who have implimented the earlier /179 with wagetypes /I04 and O04, in making this changes how would this impact the old results what do we need to be particular about when unit testing this change.
Thanks.

System will not automatically correct the values. So I think what you should do is
1. Run wagetype reporter for the old inflow and outflow wagetype and find out the employees who have them
/O04 & /I04
2. after finding the employees run the T4 and T4A for them and save it.
3. Now run the adjustment payroll in the current week for these employees with forced retro from 01/01/2010. This should correct the wages.
If the simulation run has corrected the data and check their paystubs , there should be any payments to the employees.
4. If so then do a live run.
5.Now compare the t4 and t4As for them.
Do this in unit testing and integration testing

Similar Messages

Need help FLASH not launching and not uninstalling "licensing for this product has stopped working".

Need help FLASH not launching and not uninstalling "licensing for this product has stopped working" and " you can only install one adobe product at a time please complete the other installation" Flash was working absolutely fine before, I have no idea why this happened.

I am having similar problem. Can't open any of CS3 programs after trying to download Dreamweaver Trial, which wouldn't work because "couldn't remove DLM extention" error message. So now I can not run Illustrator, Photoshop, or even Adobe Reader. These are properly licensed for about a year. I get "License for product has stopped working". Have 2 pending cases open with Adobe support (one for Dreamweaver trial, one for license problem) since 8/3 with NO ANSWERS - It says answers within 1-3 business days. Was on phone support hold today for over 3 hours before line went dead with no help. What is up with adobe support? Can anyone help?

Note Book Audio for PresarioCQ60 - audio has somehow been removed from my system what do I do

Our Audio on my Compaq Presario CQ60 is no longer on my laptop; I need to reinstall this so I have sound. Can anyone tell me where to get the correct driver to download this back on my laptop?

Hi,
Can you post back with the following details.
1. The full Model No. and Product No. of your cq60 series notebook - see Here for a guide on locating this information.
2. The full version of the operating system you are using ( ie Windows 7 64bit ).
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

MC.1(also S032) has incorrect valuated stock value

When I run the transaction MC.1 , for certain materials I get the value even if the stock qty is zero.
I checked in Info structure S032 , even here it has the same value .
Please advice & if possible detail steps of rectifying this.
Material ValStockValue Valuated stock CnsgtStock
CSG:36",373.8#,1.0 1.140,84 USD 0,000 FT 0,000 FT
Regards
Umesh

Hi Ferry,
Thanks for your reply. Hmmm. I am a little confused here. While the quantities are incorrect on S032 the valuation is correct. There are no rules against either field (i.e. qty or value) and they are both setup as 'Cumulative updating'.
When I run an update check on the material document it gives me the correct amount!
When I check (Updating -> Check) the Info Structure SAP suggests a different field to use. See msg below:
Valuated stock: Instead of using MCBEST-MBWBEST use MCBEST-BVBEW
Message no. M!126
Diagnosis
You update the key figure Valuated stock with the source field MCBEST-MBWBEST.
Cumulitavely this is not the best choice, because stock would have cumulated in each goods movement and excessively large stock is created.
This can cause problems via data transport, because stock fields are always filled. If you do not keep very detailed stock, one stock is overwritten by another (for example, batch stock is overwritten by a different batch stock).
I am even more confused now!
Thanks,
N.
PS: We have already uploaded the data so a retrospective fix would be ideal.

SAP Notes for BI7

Hi BI Experts
Can you please send me the SAP Notes no.s for BI7 which help me for certification exam?
I have knowledge of Bw 3.x.
Thanks

Hi Krishna,
Really thanks for your instructions. We have enabled hte "refresh on individual workbooks" in the workbook settings tab adn we are able to see the same in the context menu of the analysis grid.
Again i have few doubts.
I can able to see two options as below.
1. Refresh
2. Refresh this query.
What is the difference between this two?. Also when i click the "refresh this query" it shud display the "selections screen of the particular query", But it is not at all showing me a selection screen,
What i am doing is.. I am simply doing "refresh this query" option that will refresh my screen first adn i am doing change variables.
That will give me the selection screen of the particular query. If i am not doing so, all workbooks are refreshing,
Please advice, whether selection screen of the particular query can be shown when clicking "refresh this query".
Thanks/

Photoshop has detected graphics hardware that is not officially supported for 3d

From what I've read I thought 512 MB or vRAM would work with 3d. It used to anyhow. I get the pop up that says it's not officially supported for 3d, and has temporarily disabled 3d functionality.
I've tried setting the prefences under graphics processor settings to Basic, Normal, and Adavanced with no luck getting the 3d to work again. It was working fine before the last update to 13.1
I'm using a Mac Pro with 8 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512 MB, System 10.8.2
Using PS CS6 extended
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1 (13.1 20121126.r.220 2012/11/26:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Mac OS 10.8.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:23, Stepping:6 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1
Physical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3200 MHz
Built-in memory: 8192 MB
Free memory: 4618 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 7318 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 70 %
Image tile size: 1024K
Image cache levels: 4
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Basic
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Unavailable
OpenGL Version: 2.1
Video Rect Texture Size: 8192
OpenGL Memory: 444 MB
Video Card Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Video Card Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT OpenGL Engine
Display: 2
Display Depth: 32
Display Bounds: top=0, left=-2560, bottom=1600, right=0
Video Renderer ID: 16918024
Video Card Memory: 512 MB
Display: 1
Main Display
Display Depth: 32
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1600, right=2560
Video Renderer ID: 16918024
Video Card Memory: 512 MB
Serial number: Tryout Version
Application folder: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/
Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
Scratch volume(s):
Maczilla HD, 278.4G, 107.7G free
Required Plug-ins folder: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Adobe Photoshop CS6.app/Contents/Required/
Primary Plug-ins folder: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Plug-ins/
Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
Anyone have any ideas, or maybe I'm missing something. Nothing like getting an update and it busting what used to work. Dang!

I can get into the 3d pref area, but not the pull down menu area at all. It's grey'd out now that I did the update.
I just find it weird that the card is on the approved list, and meets the requirments and used to work. But yeah this mac is a few years old at this point. I'm just hoping that someone at Adobe reads this and can shed some light. I'm hoping maybe there's a button I need to click on, or something cheaper then buying an entire new computer when I really don't think I need to. Photoshop has really bloated up!

How do remove commitment value in the PO ? any SAP note avl?

Hi,
Project (WBS)releated service PO (Account assignment category P and Item category D), in which SES,GR,IR have been completed for entire Project services for the year 2005,PO history also updatd for SES, GR,IR in the 2005 only.But Now system is showing still commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?.
Henece how do remove the inconsistency of the commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?. (i.e value is comming from COOI table entry).Is there any SAP NOTEs are available for this case?
Note:
But this case no PR has been refered in the PO. PO has been directly created, and PO QTY,Value changes have not been done after SES,GR,IR completion.
But still system commitment value is showing in the PO for the year 2009, so HOW do remove the value?
i am looking suitable answers.
Regards,
kumar

Hi,
Pre-requisites for a commitment update are:
o In transaction OKKP, the commitment management indicator must be
       active for the given controlling area in the current fiscal year.
The controlling area is the highest organizational unit in Controlling,
however this area is missing from the accounting data of the PO.
o The accounting objects must be active for commitments:
- Work orders: The commitment management indicator must be set
          in transaction KOT2 for the given order type.
- Cost centers: In transaction KS02, in register "Control", the
          commitment update indicator must NOT be set.
- Projects: see note 47992
o In transaction CUNI, the unit of measurements used at item level
       must be set to value based commitment.
Please check the following notes 152571, 634298, 459509 and
772206 carefully and also 165823.
Please check also if the "delivery complete" indicator is set in the PO item (see note 735404).
Usually for service POs the "Delivery completed" indicator will be
hidden and this indicator is fully controlled by the "final entry
sheet" indicator in ML81N. You must allow to set this indicator trough a field selection customizing for your PO item.
Regards,
Edit

SAP Notes 488619 & 864481

Hi All,
has anyone tried to implement SAP Notes 488619 & 864481 for SRM 4.0 (SRM Server 5)?
These notes are supposed to correct the fact that the BAPI's for transferring Purchase Order data only transfer 22 characters for the Vendor Part Number, after applying these notes (and two other notes to R/3) then 35 characters should be transferred.
I get the following errors when trying to implement these notes
 Note 488619 - cannot add field VENDOR_MAT_LONG with component type
 IDNLF to structure BBPS_BAPIEKPOC as error message "Field
 VEND_MAT_LONG: Component type or domain used not active or does not
 exist" is generated.
 Note 864481 - the structure BAPIEKPOC which is described in the note
 does not exist in EBP nor does the component type LABNR.
Has anyone ever applied these notes? I've logged this with SAP but as the system version is old they claim it's charageable work.
Cheers
Chris

Hi
Please ensure you have done the following activities as mentioned in the SAP OSS Note - 488619.
1. Implement Notes 826541, 444770 and 455879.
2. First, check whether Note 864481 needs to be implemented in your system (this depends on the back end that you use).
3. For SRM 3.0 or lower, proceed as follows:
Call transaction SE11.
Enter structure "BAPIEBANV" as the data type and choose "Change".
Add field "VEND_MAT_LONG" to the structure and use component type "IDNLF".
Save and activate your changes.
Proceed in the same way for the following structures:
 BAPIEBANV
 BAPIEBAN
 BAPIEBANC
 BAPIEKPOC
 bbpekpoc46b
 bbpekpoc46c
 BAPIEKPO
Call transaction SE80.
In screen 3001 of function group "BBP_SC", replace field 'BAPIEBAN-VENDMAT' with field 'ITEMS-PARTNER_PROD'.
Save and activate your changes.
4. For SRM 4.0:
Call transaction SE11.
Enter structure "BBPS_BAPIEKPOC" as the data type and choose "Change".
Add field "VEND_MAT_LONG" to the structure and use component type "IDNLF".
Save and activate your changes.
5. For SRM 5.0:
Call transaction SE11.
Enter structure "BBPS_BAPIEKPO" as the data type and choose "Change".
Add field "VEND_MAT_LONG" to the structure and use component type "CHAR35".
Save and activate your changes.
Proceed in the same way for the following structures:
 BBPS_BAPIEKPOC
 BBPS_BS_RQ_ITEM_45B
 BBPS_BS_RQ_ITEM_46C
 BBPS_BS_RQ_ITEM_470
 BBPS_BS_PO_ITEM_45B
 BBPS_BS_PO_ITEM_46B
 BBPS_BS_PO_ITEM_470
 BBPS_BS_PO_ITEM_470_1
 BBPS_BS_PO_ITEM_ERP10
 BBPS_BADI_PO_ITEM_1
 BBPS_BADI_RQ_ITEM
 BBPEKPOC46B
 BBPEKPOC46C
Caution:
The structures that are specified in this note must be exactly the same in the EBP system as they are in the relevant back-end system. If the structures differ, adjust them. If you do not adjust them, it is very likely that the solution will not work. This means that you must also create fields that exist in the BAPI* structures in the relevant SRM structures.
6. Implement the correction instructions.
As mentioned in the SAP OSS Note 864481 - Changing struct 'BAPIEKPOC' of Release 4.6C and 4.7
Consulting Note. - After implementing note 626747 or applying Support Package SAPKH46C46 for R/3 46C or Support Package SAPKH47016 for R/3 470, structure 'BAPIEKPOC' is extended to a new field.
Make the following changes according to listed steps:
1. Add the following features to structure BAPIEKPOC using Transaction SE11 (Field 'Data type') after the last field:
2. For releases EBP3.0 and EBP3.5:
a) Component : PR_CLOSED
b) Component type: EBAKZ
3. For Releases EBP3.0, EBP3.5, EBP4.0, SRM 4.0, SRM 5.0:
a) Component : ACKNOWL_NO
b) Component type: LABNR
4. Save and generate the object.
Other related SAP OSS Notes to check out ->
Note 747132 APIs in BUS2105 and vendor's material number
Note 488619 Vendor's material numbers with more than 22 characters
Note 455879 BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE BAPI_PO_CREATE: Vendor material
Note 827614 Vendor product number truncated with backend PO
Note 826541 BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL: Vendor material
Note 662300 BAPI_INFORECORD_GETLIST: VEND_MAT not complete
Note 892206 - SRM invoice: Enlarge Vendor product number to 35 chars
Note 887581 - SRM invoice: Vendor product number not transferred
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Securing payload in message monitoring using SAP note 1370334

Hi Experts,
I am working to implement SAP note 1370334 to PI server.For that i have created :
1. an xml file having actions and roles according to the SAP note and zipped in .EAR file and given to BASIS team to deploy that .EAR file.
2.BASIS deployed that .EAR file successfully.
To test whether the SAP note has been uploaded successfully or not, we asked BASIS to create two 'test user ids' with minimum authorisation.
When I am testing through RWB to see payload without assigning any roles to the created test user, it is showing 'No authorisation'.
But when we assigned role to one test user, both the test user are able to see the payload.But according to the SAP note, payload should be visible to one user only not to the other.
And according to roles assinged in Action.xml file, display authorisation is only from sender service 'A' to receiver service 'B' but message content are visible for all services.
Canm anyone help me why is it happening or where I am going wrong or suggest me if I am testing in wrong way??
It's Urgent!!!
thanks in advance.

hi debraj..
is ur mesage ie sxmb_moni in red staus or scheduled status...??
if in scheduled cud be errors with queues ...delete ur queues with tcodes : smq1 and smq2...
and also hopefully u must have configured ur idoc correctly..
https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000071155&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202
regards..
vishal

SAP Note implemetation - SNote or manually

Recently for Budget 2007-08 for India SAP has released a master note which has a series of notes to be implemented. These notes includes screen, DDIC and coding changes.
As far as I know screen & DDIC changes has to be manually implemented. For coding related changes if Snote status is "Can be implemented" should one implement through Snote or manually.
Kindly suggest the merits and demerits of these techniques.
Thanks
anu

Hi Ani,
After downloading the SAP Notes: Check the implementation Status. If it is "Can be Implemented" then the SAP Notes is suitable for implementation in your system.
Read the SAP Note carefully, this is mandatory there can be any other pre-requisite notes or some other notes that might have to be implemented along with this note which'll be explained in the SAP Note. Once you have gone through them.
Implement all the Pre-requisite notes and follow the Manual steps that are specified in the note. Once all the manual steps are implemented.
Click on the "Implement SAP Note" button to implement the SAP Note. you may get a pop-up here to read the SAP Note, say "YES". Now all the code corrections will be placed in the system in which you are implementing. The Activation pop-up will appear with all the objects that have been changed with the Code Corrections.
Click enter. Now the implementation of SAP Notes is completed. The implementation status changes to "Completely Implemented". Change the processing status to "Completed".
Please let me know if further details are required.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Goutham.

Customer/vendor could not be determined for IDOC

Hi all,
Am trying to post incoming payments through EDI ..
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
Am getting these 2 errors :
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document
Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
Has anyone encountered this problem, if yes can anyone suggest the solutions, any help regarding this is highly appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi,
Currently I am facing with the same type error when trying to post incoming payments through EDI.
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
I am getting the below error:
1. Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
I have maintained record records for partner type and partner number in OBCA.
Please advice what are the other configuration changes do I need to maintain.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Edited by: Victor Collins on Feb 27, 2009 9:31 PM

Content of SAP Note copied to a blog

Hi,
I was just browsing through the Blog section, where i came across this blog /people/raja.ramasamy2/blog/2010/10/04/how-to-configure-valuated-project-stock , The major portion of this blog is nothing but a content of an SAP note(Note 533207 - Valuated and nonvaluated project stock). i.e., sections like valuated project stock, Advantages, Disadvantages are copied from the SAP note word to word and the user contribution is only the screen shots and few lines. Is it allowed to write a blog like this?
I read the Blog general rules where it says "Always clearly distinguish between your work and someone else's." I dont see the user mentioning the SAP note number.

Thanks for the notification. It is being dealt with.
matt

Issue : Regarding SAP Note 1465628

Dear All,
we have to Implement the SAP Note No 1465628 , For that During manual Corrections , we are Unable to Upload the HR_IN_ESI_005_99 , it is saying
ERROR Ocuured unknown file Format (unknown)
Our System is ECC6 , Please help on this to Get the SAP note Apply.
Thanks & Regds
Manish
Edited by: Sikindar on Jun 10, 2010 5:18 PM

Regarding your query, to use the transaction SFP you have to install and configure ADS (Adobe Document Services). Can you please check whether you have done the necessary configuration or not?
Please have a look at note 894009 and the reference note attached to it.
Regards
Ramana

How to revert back a SAP NOTE? Dump- Field symbol has not yet been assigned

Hi Experts,
We r getting dump(cause: Field symbol has not yet been assigned) in production for ABUMN tx, so, when debugged, it came to know that, the Field symbol is coming from REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY!!
So, for some reason the system message text is not getting output in ALV-->Dump!!
So, found a NOTE causing this problem!!
So, pls. let me know that, How to revert back this/any SAP NOTE? pls. in detail steps wise!!
thanq
Edited by: Srinivas on Jan 24, 2008 4:32 PM

Hi
In SNOTE tcode, select the Note that you implemented and click on 'RESET SAP Note Implementation'
shylesh

How to find out the GR Numbers for which IR has not been done

Hi Sap Gurus,
Can anybody tell me how to find out the G R Numbers for which Invoice Receipt has not been done. Any TC or ant standard process to find out.
Thanks N Regards,
Siddhartha

Hi Siddarth,
Solution :
        1) Go to SE16 - Table Name : EKBE (PO History)
        2) Field - BUDAT (Posting Date)
        3) Transaction event Type:
                         - 1 (Only GR's )
                         - 2 (Both GR and IR)
        4) We can fetch both GR Numbers and also PO Numbers for which IR has not been done if transaction event - 1.
In addition to MB5S, you can try this also...

SAP Note 1438667 - WT for T4A redesign has incorrect valuation bases

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for