Sap Note Problem
Hi,
I am applying Note in Sap , if i apply note in development server and make its request and transport that request to
production server then it is showing me error but if i apply the same note in production it is applied successfully/
Its a matter of production server so i don want to take any risk and want to update note via request only , the error
which i am getting is
R3TRPROGJ_1I_CHALLAN_TOP was repaired in this system.
same like above in 7-8 objects, please suggest how to remove this probelm ??
Ankesh Jindal
>
Ankur Parab wrote:
> I dont see any problem in directly applying your note in production. However this assumption is always debatable.
> As a practise it should be avoided. It should always go via Development.
In my opinion, its a big problem as it will make the system landscape workbench objects unequal.
so it always better to keep the clients throughout the system landscape equal. To ensure this you must apply any patches/notes first to your development(Sandbox is fine if u have one) and then move it to Production Via Quality.
Regards
Karthik D
Similar Messages
-
SAP Note Number 1535966 problem with IDWTFILE_US_1042.XML
Dear Colleagues,
I have installed the new SAP note for the 1099 from for Tax year of 2010 (note Nr.1535966).
at Step 7 when I upload the IDWTFILE_US_1042.XML file, the activation of this files fails and gives the following error messages:
Error in node WH Agent Contact: source field IDWTADD-US_AGENT_NAME does not exist
Message no. DMEE_ABA306
Error in node WH Agent Dept.: source field IDWTADD-US_DEPT_TITLE does not exist
Message no. DMEE_ABA306
My Platform is as follow:
SAP_ABA 700 0013 SAPKA70013 Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS 700 0015 SAPKB70015 SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS 2005_1_700 0013 SAPKIPYJ7D PI_BASIS 2005_1_700
ST-PI 2008_1_700 0001 SAPKITLRD1 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW 700 0015 SAPKW70015 SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
SAP_AP 700 0009 SAPKNA7009 SAP Application Platform
SAP_APPL 600 0010 SAPKH60010 Logistics and Accounting
SAP_HR 600 0018 SAPKE60018 Human Resources
FI-CA 600 0010 SAPK-60010INFICA FI-CA
FI-CAX 600 0010 SAPK-60010INFICAX FI-CA Extended
Have you had this problem? do you know of a solution? It seems to me that the relevant IDWTFILE_US_1042.XML file must be incorrect!
Help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Regards;
HameedHi Cheryl,
I used the trx SMARTFORMS to upload all of the forms mentioned. This earlier thread with one of my questions answered might be helpful to you.
OSS Note 1535966 - a Smartforms question
Also, you may need to change the package for some of the forms to ID-FI-US as the note suggests. Use trx SE03 to change the package for a form that might not already be in package ID-FI-US.
We only use form MISC and none of the others, but I uploaded and did the note steps for all anyway.
I think this note lacks a bit of clarity.
Thanks
Jeremy -
Modification problems while applying SAP Note manually
Hi Guys,
I am facing some problems while applying a SAP note manually (it cannot be applied without manual changes).
There is one standard program which I am trying to change for this purpose, but it does not allow me to do so saying "Carry out modification comparison for REPS RPCT8AR1_01 first. No changes possible" !!
Now I can go to SPAU and reset the object, but it will lose all its changes which was done
by 2 SAP notes previously.
How can I apply my SAP Note without reverting the changes ? If I revert the changes, I lose
the changes for other 2 notes !!
Is there a solution for this? please help asap.
Many thanks in advance,
Sandip.If you did not modified the program manually, you dont have to worry. implement your note from SNOTE transaction.
even if you loose previous modifications, you can always get them back by going SPAU transaction and import the transport numbers.
I had the same problem but we had manual changes to the program that is why didnt allow to implement note -
SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"
Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situationHi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT -
How to revert back a SAP NOTE? Dump- Field symbol has not yet been assigned
Hi Experts,
We r getting dump(cause: Field symbol has not yet been assigned) in production for ABUMN tx, so, when debugged, it came to know that, the Field symbol is coming from REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY!!
So, for some reason the system message text is not getting output in ALV-->Dump!!
So, found a NOTE causing this problem!!
So, pls. let me know that, How to revert back this/any SAP NOTE? pls. in detail steps wise!!
thanq
Edited by: Srinivas on Jan 24, 2008 4:32 PMHi
In SNOTE tcode, select the Note that you implemented and click on 'RESET SAP Note Implementation'
shylesh -
Performance credit master data (FD32)--SAP Note 705317
Hi,
When running the FD32 tranasaction,I am changing the credit account and saving the transaction...it is taking quite a long time and going for dump....TIME_OUT error.
The appropriate notes for this problem are 705317 and 9937.
I shall give the details details of the note.
SymptomLong runtimes occur for the reorganization of credit data in SD documents.
This reorganization can occur in two situation:
- You start report RFDKLI20.
- You create or change credit master data in Transaction FD32.
Reason and PrerequisitesIn the credit management, you change assignments in Customizing or create or change
credit master data. The transfer of the changed settings into existing SD documents
requires a reorganization of these documents.
The reorganization is triggered from Transaction FD32 or using report RFDKLI20. Since
the relevant partner function in the credit management is the payer, all open sales
documents for a payer are selectedfor the reorganization.
The selection is performed within function module SD_CREDIT_RECREATE, which is called
from both Transaction FD32 and report RFDKLI20.
The documents are selected according to one of the two following options:1. Partner index VAKPA
The relevant documents are selected via partner index VAKPA. In index table VAKPA,
the system updates all SD documents for a customer number in dependency on the
partner function. All documents for a payer can be determined using index table
VAKPA.
CAUTION: Partner index VAKPA is only updated if the corresponding partner
functions and transactions are activated in Customizing table TINPA. Table TINPA
does not provide any update for the payer partnerfunction in the standard system!
2. Document table VBPA
If the update for the payer is not active in table TINPA, the relevant documents
are selected via application table VBPA. Table VBPA contains the used partners
(customer numbers) for SD documents.
The access to table VBPA with the customer number of the payer requires a long
SAP Note Nr. 705317 07.02.2008 Page 1
runtime because the customer number is not a key field in table VBPA. It might
result in a TIME_OUT.
Solution
Due to the technical conditions described above, there are two possible solutions for
runtime problems in Transaction FD32 or with report RFDKLI20:
1. Activate the update of index table VAKPA for the payer partner function:
Activate the update of index table VAKPA for the payer partner function by
creating an entry with transaction = 0, partner function = RG in table TINPA. You
can use Transaction SM31 for that.
Subsequently, a reorganization of index table VAKPA is absolutely required!! You
can execute the reorganization with report RVV05IVB. Note that all existing SD
documents thus also those ones already closed are indexed again by this report.
Depending on the number of your documents in the system, this can result in a
runtime which is correspondingly long. Therefore test this beforehand in a copy of
your production system!
2. Create a database secondary index for table VBPA:
If a reorganization of index table VAKPA is not possible or not wanted, you can
optimize the access via document table VBPA. For that, create a database secondary
index for table VBPA.
We cannot provide a general recommendation on how you have to define the secondary
index in detail. This basically depends on your dataset.
Use the SQL trace with Transaction ST05 in order to analyze the access onto table
VBPA within function module SD_CREDIT_RECREATE. Then define a suitable database
secondary index for table VBPA according to your analysis results.
For example, you could create the secondary index for VBPA fields KUNNR and PARVW.
Test the new secondary index by creating an SQL trace with Transaction ST05 again
in order to check the effectiveness of the database access and the runtime.
Also take the related notes into account.
Use Note 99937 to avoid the automatic reorganization - and thus runtime problems - in
Transaction FD32. Note that this does not solve the runtime problem during the
reorganization in general, but shifts it to RFDKLI20 which you can schedule as a job.
Thus, you are not disturbed by the runtime problem.
Please can anyone help me as to in which table and what fields i need to take to create secondary index.Thank you,
madhu.Hi
Instead of creating Indexxes u contact basis to increase the the time limit for the execution
Regards
Shiva -
ERROR while checking standard program for SAP NOTE 175482(QM)
HI,
experts
i am implementing sap note 175842 QM MODULE .
My note is successfully implemented ,for that i created standard program RQEVAC50 USING ACCES KEY.
but in se38 report comes like this
REPORT RQEVAC50.
REPORT RQEVAC50 MESSAGE-ID QA.
so while checking error comes boz 2 report hedaing is there .
I WANT TO DELETE FIRST ONE BUT IT CANT.
I chose activate anyway but while releasing request it gives error.
THANKS
AJAY.hi
error is 'OBJECT REPS RQEVAC50 does not exit create it'**
I CREATED PROGRAM USING ACCESS KEY SO IT DOES NOT ALLOW ME TO CHANGE OR DELETE ANY LINE IN THE PROGRAM.
THATS THE MAIN PROBLEM.
Whwn i created a program RQEVAC50 it is totally blank but while implementing sap note the code comes in my progarm
so there are 2 report hedaing .
THANKS
AJAY. -
SAP Note 0001370334: Error while deploying EAR file
Hi All,
We have a project requirement where payload should not be visible in both IE(SXMB_MONI) and RWB(Channel Monitoring). We have followed sap note 0001370334 and created .ear file as per sample .ear file given in the sap note.
Here the problem is when we are trying to deploy that .ear file using NWDS, it is throwing exception :
[ERROR CODE DPL.DCAPI.1027] SduLoadingException.
Additional information: 'The information about the development component found in the manifest is either missing or incomplete!
Manifest attributes are missing or have badly formatted value:
attribute keylocation is missing
attribute keyname is missing
attribute keyvendor is missing
attribute keycounter is missing
Kindly provide ur inputs.
Thanks,
VeneelaDid you see this link? Looks like your ear file is not as expected. Please delete and create and deploy again
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/JSTSG/%28JSTSG%29%28Deploy%29Problems-P29
/thread/1516905 [original link is broken] -
Issue in implementing the sap note 1401975
Hi All,
I am trying to implement the sap note 1401975 in the 4.7 version( SAP_APPL 470, Patch level 26). to implement this note i have to create a Function Module with export parameter of TYPE SEPA_STR_DATA_MANDATE_DATA. the problem here is the structure SEPA_STR_DATA_MANDATE_DATA not available in my system and no instructions are given in the note to create this structure. i have also implemented the prerequisite notes 1305012, 1360908.
your Quick response will be highly appreciated.Reason and Prerequisites
As a prerequisite, you require Noter 1090321 for SEPA Direct Debit and the two SEPA credit transfer Notes 1305012 and 1360908. Check whether these notes have already been implemented (search in the ABAP Dictionary (transaction SE11) for the structures FPAYHX_MDT and FPM_SEPA and check in transaction SE37 whether the function DMEE_EXIT_SEPA_21 already exists) and implement them if necessary.
To be able to use the B2B (Business to Business) function, you also require enhancements in the SEPA third-party management (SAP Basis) that are delivered in a separate note.
Check this prerequisite notes 1090321, 1305012 and 1360908 and its corrections present in your system
Edited by: praveen reddy on Feb 1, 2011 2:47 PM -
Installation of SAP Note 612011
Hi,
Iu2019m going to install SAP note 612011 in order to make sure that the system no longer automatically sets the final indicator 'Clearing Indicator for GR/IR Posting for External Services' while processing an incoming invoice.
As itu2019s possible to read in the noteu2019s text, u201Cthis modification is not a function in the standard SAP system. SAP takes no responsibility and provides no maintenance for problems that may occur as a result of this modificationu201D.
So Iu2019d like to know if someone, after having installed this note, encountered any problem.
Thanks in advance,
ElisaHello,
As you know data and log entries of a MaxDB database instance are stored on so called volumes which are either files or, where this is possible, raw devices.
The benefits of a RAW device is a faster write performance. Also, a RAW device is much more secure because of the direct write to disks instead of caching the writes. The caching of writes could cause inconsistencies if a crash occurs.
Please go at :
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/ -> MaxDB Library
-> Concepts of the Database System -> Creating and Configuring a Database Instance
-> Planning the Database Instance < & Technical Restrictions >
At the 'Planning the Database Instance' section in the paragraph 'Database Size and Configuration of Volumes' you will find more information.
And you could see in more details, why we recommend to use raw devices for
data and log volumes in MAXDB on UNIX systems.
Please also review the information at link - MaxDB FAQ (frequently asked questions) on the MySQL site (target audience: Open Source) :
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/maxdb_faq.html
< '5.2. How do I configure the database files?' >
SAP customers can find more information in SAP Note 820824.
And if you are SAP customer please review the SAP notes for additional
information:
628131 SAP DB / MaxDB operating system parameters on Unix
767598 Available documentation
748225 Measurement IO times on liveCache/SAP DB/MaxDB DATA/LOG
Volumes
Thank you and best regards, Natalia Khlopina -
SAP note 709354 - DB Clustering
An extract from the sap note:
--->>>
With SAP Enterprise Portal 6.0 on Web AS 6.40, DB Clustering will not be officially supported. This applies to Microsoft SQL, as well as to Oracle Database cluster implementations. The technical feasability of active/active DB-Cluster solutions (like ORACLE RAC or MS SQL in active/active cluster mode) in conjuction with SAP Enterprise Portal 6.0 on Web AS 6.40 Support Pack Stack 01 is under investigation. But there are currently no plans to release it within the NetWeaver '04 timeframe. Since some customer projects have shown that EP 6.0 SP2 is able work on top of an active/passive DB-Cluster-Solution SAP is willing to help customers on a project to get DB-Cluster related problems solved (in case of Oracle this is true for Fail Over mechanisms, but not for Real Application Clustering (RAC)). If you are interested in setting up DB-clustering on your own risk and on a project base, please contact SAP NetWeaver Product Management via your SAP contact in sales or consulting.
<<<---
Would someone from SAP like to comment on this, does it mean that active/passive clustering as already supported or that ANY mode of clustering will be unsupported. And within the timeframe of NW04?? Isn't that until around 2013?
Has anyone had any experiences with active/passive clustering, especially Oracle on Windows, with EP6 SP3 and higher?
Although the note indicates that it 'can (and probably will) be changed without notice' it remains a slightly worrying note, as I'm sure we all want to cluster our production portal central instance and database don't we?The problem no longer exists. If you maintain the codepages equally in the external DB and in the SAP BW DB, everything should work fine.
-
COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW on MIRO. Any SAP NOTE?
Hi,
I'm getting a COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW dump with the the CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW exception when doing a MIRO process.
The user is using huge values in the PO and the error is related to a multiplication between this values. (EKTE table is hoding the huge value that is greater than 1 billion).
I see no ABAP solution at this moment. A friend said that we should have some SAP note to make the field greater.
Does someone knows about this note?
below we have more details related to the DUMP:
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLFDMM" - in "DETERMINE_AMOUNTS".
The main program was "SAPLMR1M ".
The procedure is in program "SAPLFDMM "; its source code begins in line
197 of the (Include program "LFDMMF00 ".]
Source code:
300 * Quantity of goods received greater than purchase order qua
301 * or "Delivery completed" indicator is set
302 if ekbp-wemng > ekbp-bemng "Überlieferung
303 or ekbp-elikz <> space. "Endlieferungskennzeichen
304 * offene Bestellmenge = Wareneingangsmenge minus Rechnungs
305 * open PO quantity = quantity of goods received - quantity
306 offen_bestmenge = ekbp-wemng - ekbp-remng.
307 else.
308 * offene Bestellmenge = Bestellmenge minus Rechnungsmenge
309 * open PO quantity = PO quantity minus quantity invoiced
310 offen_bestmenge = ekbp-bemng - ekbp-remng.
311 endif.
312
313 *------- Obligo = offene Bestellmenge * Bestellwert / Bestellmen
314 if ekbp-bemng > 0. "Division durch 0 verhind
315 if offen_bestmenge = ekbp-bemng.
316 wabetrag = ekbp-bewtw. "erspart unnötige Multiplikat
317 else.
>>>>> wabetrag = offen_bestmenge * ekbp-bewtw / ekbp-bemng.
319 endif.
320 endif.
321 endif. "if ekbp-vrtkz = const_po_valuebased
Thanks in advanced!Hi Rob, Thanks for answer.
Unfortunately, I do not have access to do that. The MM functional asked for the ABAP leader of the project for look for it...
I asked here because maybe someone had a common problem and want to share the solution. I'm not lazy If I could look at the note sure I would did!
Does someone knows this error or something related on this?
Thanks in advanced! -
Price List Error in Bill of Materials in relation to SAP Note 1056208
Hi Experts,
I have uploaded the Bill of Materials --both the Header and Lines using DTW successfully but when I try to update the Product Price of the Parent manually in the Bill of Materials, this error occurs:
"Variation between number of price lists and number of price lists for items"
I have also tried running the script provided in SAP Note 1056208 to check if there are any inconsistencies in the Price List records but there is none. The number of records in both tables are the same.
We have 3 levels of Bill of Materials (FG, WIP1, WIP2). I need to update the Product Price of WIP2 first so that its price will appear in the line items since it is a component of WIP1.
I hope you could help me with my problem and I would appreciate your prompt replies.
Thank you very much!Hi!
In BOM u will find a Orange Color Drop Down Arrow @ Right-Bottom Corner. You have to click on that to generate Price for your Parent based on the Child.
Select the Approp Price List in Header of BOM and in Row Level. Update prices for Child Items, now Follow the above step. -
Exchange Rate differences in FC. SAP Note: 999974
Hi All
We are having problem in clearing of bank accounts due to balance being incorrect.
We implemented SAP Note: 999974 but seems like i am missing something,
In User Exit FEB00001 my code is:
IF i_febep-fwaer NE ''.
wa_febcl-selfd = 'FM'.
wa_febcl-selvon = 'ZFEB_2_ADD_DMBTR'.
APPEND wa_febcl TO t_febcl.
CLEAR wa_febcl.
ENDIF.
Can anyone please help me on this.
Thanks in advance.
HarshHi
For the note 999974, the pre reuiqusite is point five of OSS 494777. I assume this you have already done.
Now the value in the field FEBEP-FWAER is populated during foreign currency transaction. When I analyzed the program rfebka00 for the MT940 unstructured format, I saw that std SAp looks for pattern /OCMT/ in the tag 86 This is an identifier for foreign payment ( refer link http://martin.hinner.info/bankconvert/swift_mt940_942.pdf).
Because this the Field FEBEP-FWAER and FEBEP-FWBTR is populated with foriegn curr and foreign amt resp.
You issue I believe is when it posts to the subledger you get an in correct FX gain/loss as Std SAP doesnt pass the Amt in LC from the EBS. For which you are implementing this note.
Please check whether you are getting the file in below format if you using MT940.
test data as appearing for me
:61:110713CD500,00NCHG03MT123456789123//RE12345678-12345
/OCMT/EUR5100,/
Regards
Nikhil -
Snote error while uploading SAP Note
Hello everyone
Today i encountered strange problem with transaction Snote. I was asked to implement a SAP Note wit snote, so i have downloaded the note with Download Manager (i haven't configured OSS connection yet), and wanted to upload it to snote. When i try to upload, i get error SCWN017, Data file of SAP Note is incomplete. I checked this downloaded note on another system, and the note was uploaded successfully. I have no idea, what happened - i used snote a week ago, and i was able to upload Sap notes without any problems. No upgrades (SP's od addons) since then were made to the system. Does anyone has an idea what to do?Hi,
pls reconfigure your oss connection and check this note
959624
DFPS 6.10 SP1: Collection of notes concerning known errors
Regards
Nayeem
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can't figure out problem with new PC
Hi all, I just built my first PC and everything's running pretty well with the exception of some lag and freezing. My mouse and keyboard sometimes lag behind my true movement. The mouse does this more often and will lag behind for a second before i
-
How do I restore iTunes library from flash drive backup?
How do I restore iTunes library from flash drive backup?
-
Can't get photo off hard drive and into windows
I have three sets of photos on my hard drive that I want to put onto my windows computer and can't. Can anyone help?
-
Has anyone in the community successfully OR NOT implemented Simpana backup?
We purchased Dell Comm Vault wth Simpana MML. We have been fighting with it trying to get it installed for a couple of months. We finally got a Simpana engineer on site and we are actually able to run sbttest successfully, but when we try to use the
-
Determing DBA vs IMP_FULL_DATABASE in 9i vs 10g
Is there a difference between 9i and 10g in the way they each determine whether a user has DBA with regards to importing an export that was exported by a DBA user? The reason I ask, we have an export that was taken from a 9i database using a 9i clien