SAP NW PI license issue

Hello,
I installed PI70 some time back and ordered SAP for license key. But, due to issues i have to re-install it later. What happened here is the hardware key is changed after the installation. Is it means i have request again SAP to get license key to match my Hardware key.
Hope it is unque to Message server, i mean when you install PI (Message server) it also generate this hardware key.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hi
You send request sap for new licence key they will give you this Then you apply this When you change hardware The hardware key changed so you send detail to service.sap.com/licence
Thanks
Pankaj Kumar

Similar Messages

Licensing issues - SAP Press books

I've just been reading threads on the licensing issues surrounding the preview versions of SAP and I'm saddened to hear that renewable licensing may be removed in the future.
I was just wondering if SAP have thought about all the books in circulation and still for sale that people (including myself) have purchased in good faith to use and learn/demo new SAP functionality, for example, Horst Keller's excellent ABAP Objects book that includes the NSP system.
Let's hope SAP have a re-think and reinstate the renewable licensing permanently.

Hello,
You can always download the newest NSP system from SDN portal and get a renewable license.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC

Hi,
The SAP GRC 10.0 solution comes as bundled solution for AC, PC and RM. While downloading the SAP GRC 10.0 all the three components are downloaded but in a dormant state.
With the release of GRC 10.0, Access Control and Process Control are offered as an integrated solution, both at the data layer and at the user interface layer. This new unified platform enables increased harmonization of key master data.
GRC 10.0 is a harmonized platform. Although maintenance of data within AC and PC is similar in 10.0 as it was in previous releases, there are some key differences. The following master data is shared between AC and PC for the release 10.0 integration scenario.
u2022 Organizations
u2022 Business Processes
u2022 Business Subprocesses
u2022 Controls
SAP GRC System Add-ons:
Access Control, Process Control and Risk Management are contained in one ABAP add-on u201CGRCFND_Au201D
SAP Backend System Plug-ins:
A. GRCPINW: NW Function Modules hold the AC functions for ERP systems without HR (former non-HR RTA)
B. GRCPIERP: PC relevant features are contained in the plug-in GRCPIERP, for example, for running automated controls and the HR relevant functions for AC (former HR RTA)
There are multiple activation points for AC, PC and RM:
u2022 SAP GRC SPRO -> activate the Application. However
u2022 When we go for the Plug-ins (GRCPIERP) installation in backend systems with HR function module it also brings in the PC relevant features.
u2022 Mitigating Control definition based on Organizations
I had activated the Application AC and PC for some time assuming that PC is required to create the Mitigation Control and Organizations. However I just realized that Mitigating Control and Organization can be created even without Activating PC, which does nothing but removes the additional features of PC.
My Query:
u2022 Kindly let me know if I can still use PC to create and assign Mitigating Control as a shared resource for AC and PC or I have violated Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC when I am supposed to use just Access Control.
u2022 How is shared resources in SAP GRC 10 dealt in terms of Licensing of Applications in SAP GRC 10.
Thanking you in advance.

all the new pc's we've purchased for a time now, don't have a Win7 CoA product key attached, even though they come with Win7 downgrade rights, so your strategy to use the CoA pkeys for the Win7 install on the new machines might be flawed.
We don't buy HP, and I'm in Australia, so I'm not sure if this will be the same for you.
Also, the OEM image that you would use to re-deploy/re-image with, may need to be different for varying models (OEMs might include different drivers, or other checks or blockers, in their image and OOBE scripts), and, the embedded OEM "master" product key/certificate
could vary (or not align) across model types/generations.
Ours do have the SLIC table in firmware and the OA markers, and we use VL Win7 Enterprise anyway, so our 40,000 machine fleet means VL and Software Assurance as a part of our EA + Select is an (expensive) no-brainer really.
The other thought I have for you, is the re-imaging rights that are bestowed when you have a VL agreement (and therefore, are not bestowed if you don't have one). Because we do have a VL agreement, I've never dived into how it might be worked if we didn't
have VL.
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/reimaging.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/downgrade-rights.aspx
If you do look at a VL agreement, I'm told they start from as few as 5 machines. And, if you purchase new pc's, you have the option to enrol the new pc's into Software
Assurance within 90days of purchase, which I imagine would save you some cost, compared to attaching SA to them at a later time, presumably requiring you to pay full ticket price for that.
I'd recommend you get some advice from an MS reseller, even if only to work out what the various options/costs might be.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

SAP Adobe Print forms - Issue with Chinese characters

Hi All,
We are using SAP Adobe Print forms to create a business document. This is designed using Adobe Life Cycle Designer (ALD). The form is displayed in Chinese language. The requirement is to display captions for few fields in bold.
When designing the form we have put the caption as BOLD but when the actual form is generated only few characters are displayed in bold.
I am not sure if this is problem with Adobe Reader or should there be any specific fonts to be installed in the ADS server?
Please let me know which all font packs needs to be installed in the local machine?

Hi Pat,
Thank you again for your reply.
Now, I changed the font in the designer to "Adobe Song Std L" and made the text as "BOLD". Then I get a message
The following is the Designer screen shot.
Questions:
1. Does "Adobe Song Std L" support characters in BOLD?
2. Do I need to install any of those BOLD fonts? If so, where can I get them?
3. I understand that the BOLD font needs to be installed in the local machine (where the design actually happens so that the font can be specified), the ADS Server (where the actual PDF is rendered) and also in the viewers local machine (where the PDF document is viewed). Is this correct?
4. Is the font a freeware or will there be any licensing issues?
Again, thank you for your responses till now.

PI license issue..

Hello,
I installed PI70 some time back and ordered SAP for license key. But, due to issues i have to re-install it later. What happened here is the hardware key is changed after the installation. Is it means i have request again SAP to get license key to match my Hardware key.
Hope it is unque to Message server, i mean when you install PI (Message server) it also generate this hardware key.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hello,
Thanks for your replies. When i do tcode slicense-- i can see in current settings "Active Hardware key" and "Installation number" as Initial. I sent this Active Hardware key last time for license request. In response from SAP i can see this hardware key.
But, now this different....I am foolish but to clarify.. Is it allow to overwrite hardware key if install license key.
Is it this Active Hardware keythe associated to Message server. How can i check this.
Also, when i install my license key, i have to login as sap*
And My Pi installation is on client 001 -- so i have to login to 001 as sap*
and install license key.
Also, one more thing. From 2004s, it is digitally singed licesence key. I can see five lines of license key. If it is digital is the process is different.
Thanks,
Srinivas

SAP Portal user license

Dear All!
I am trying to dig for SAP's policy about SAP Portal user licensing... Is there any document or does anybody know how SAP deals with portal users' licensing?
Moreover, is it legal to map multiple portal users against single backend (SAP ECC) user? If yes then is there any limit to it?
I am waiting for the response.
Regards,
Muhammad Abdul Qawi

Satish,
I read your post regarding your check on EP - R3 License. I'd like to know more about your check.
In our region, we hardly find any clear response on this issue.
My scenarios is typical : Many User Account in EP UME (either local db or link to AD), and we have lots of custom Web Dynpro application using JCo destination to read as well as write data to R3.
We're not sure how many R3 License we need for this scenario. From your reply, "one license" were mentioned for "WRITE" data to R3. I'm not sure what the "one license" mean.
Let's say we have 5 concurrent EP user having "WRITE" operation (via our web dynpro and then JCo, RFC) against R3. Do you mean we need to buy 5 R3 license ? or just one R3 license for "service account" ?
Hope you can shed some light
Thanks

Strange license issue while creating new isolation group

Dear all,
we just installed CPS M28.20-37214 on NW 7.0 SP 21.
Now I want to create an isolation group and get following error:
*10:30:27 AM: JCS-122045: Unlicensed feature: ProcessServerService.SAP.limit     *
Error details:
JCS-122035: Unable to persist: JCS-102081: License does not permit this modification for Isolation Group-object: Isolation Group
And this is our free-of-charge license:
CPS-Basic     ProcessServerService.SAP.ApplicationsAPI     true
CPS-Basic     ProcessServerService.SAP.SolutionManager     true
CPS-Basic     ProcessServerService.SAP.XBPExternal     true
CPS-Basic     ProcessServerService.SAP.limit     0
CPS-Basic     System.NamedUsers.limit     10
CPS-Basic     System.Production     true
CPS-Basic     company.contract     CPS-Basic
CPS-Basic     company.name     xxxxxxxx
CPS-Basic     product.name     SAP Central Process Scheduling by Redwood
CPS-Basic     signature     3
CPS-Basic     system.id     SAP:xxxx
This seems to be really strange 'cause I obligatory need a new isolation group to go on with configuration.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Alex

Dear Adrienne,
I replaced the real system name and id with xxxx, just for security purposes.
All roles have been created and should work fine.
In the meantime I could isolate the problem: there is obviously a license issue when you have more than a main instance running.
Tomorrow a workshop is on with Redwood in Sinsheim, Germany. I hope to get some hints.
Best regards,
Alex

Adobe acrobat 9 pro installation/licensing issues

I installed my licensed copy of Acrobat 9 on a new Windows 7 system. Acrobat launched but would not open files and shuts down on attempt. Message is "Licensing for this product has stopped working" with subtext "You cannot use the product at this time. You must repair the problem by uninstalling and then reinstalling this product or contacting your IT administrator or Adobe customer support for help."
I doubt any of you have a solution, so I simply remark on what transpired as a warning and complaint:
1. I went to Adobe databse and found that a patch was provided to correct installations/licensing problems on windows 7. I downloaded it and installed per instructions. It did not resolve the problem.
2. I uninstalled/reinstalled several times. no resolution.
3. I called customer support and was outsourced to someone who knew little and first sent me to a kb article having to do with 'expired licensing' even though I clearly informed them that the message and the fact had nothing to do with expired licenses. They finally referred me to kb405970 on "Licensing has stopped working". I tried all of the applicable solutions (methods 1-6) and none of them worked. Now I will have to wait until tomorrow (though I had pressing work to do today) to contact support again. I fear I will get another outsourced tech who knows little and wastes more of my time. Such is Adobe's way of supporting paid and licensed product users.
I understand and sympathize with Adobe's wishes to protect its products from piracy. However, I expect and paid for a product which works on major and supported operating systems like windows 7. I also understand that if MS or Mac put out a new OS or version, it may require certain adjustments or updates on Adobe's part. What I do not understand (or have patience with) is that 1) Adobe failed to provide a patch that works; 2) that it then sends me to an outsourced customer service tech who didn't have the knowledge to correct the problem and gave me the wrong information to begin with*. What I finally got was the kb article with a series of multi-step instructions for several methods, none of which worked. This is an unprofessional and unethical response to those of us who have paid for our product and expect it to work under reasonable conditions in a supported environment. This is not an acceptable good-faith effort to resolve issues for which Adobe should take full responsibility.
If any of you do happen to have a real solution (or had a similar problem) do let me know....
*The first thing the outsourced tech wished to do was get onto my machine via a remote connection, before anything was tried other than giving them the error message and have them provide me with the wrong information. It became clear that this person had less knowledge than I do (which isn't saying much) and there was no way I was going to permit a clueless techie to crawl around in my machine and fiddle with settings. That is simply asking for trouble. I'm perfectly capable of opening panels and following instructions myself. DC should be the last thing tried; not the first.

Bill, I tried as you suggested - installed every update from 9.1 through 9.3.4. The 'license not working message persists'. The only change was that now Acrobat will not close and must be forced to shut down from the taskbar menu. I appreciate the suggestion though.
Called Adobe (Manila) again, within the hours given on their contact page for installation and licensing issues, and was told "It's Sunday, nobody here can help you". Finally, after an hour of hammering got them to get me a supervisor (their script says to tell the customer there "Is no supervisor available on Sunday" - Finally the "supervisor", Alvin, suggested I need a new serial number and left me on the line while he called someone else to get on. Cameback and informed me that he couldn't get one, I'd have to call Monday (how's that for having solutions?) Result: wasted more time and had more delay on my project.
Conclusion: Adobe has become obsessed and 'piranoic' about piracy and licensing to the extent that they put that first and client/customer needs second (if that). After reading a lot of online 'Adobe Sucks' forums, I'm inclined to believe Adobe is shooting itself in its own foot and is not going to be a reliable method of presentation/document transmission in the future - service and support is an integral part of software and other concerns such as piracy or licensing need to be transparent to legitimate users. Sad that they spend so much time on this, when they need to be fixing real problems. As well, these outsourcing Philipines companies are poor substitutes for good support - they are so scripted and obsessed with regulations over solutions that it is clear that only the most persistent users will get anywhere with them. As a frontline of contact with after-sale clients, they are going to cost Adobe a lot of potential business in the future, whatever their short-term savings. Too bad. Adobe used to be a leader in the market.
Next round: Calling Manila again this am. to be continued...

ORA-20001: The printing engine..Is this related to a BIP licensing issue?

Hello all,
The error "ORA-20001: The printing engine could not be reached because either the URL..." happens in 2 cases:
<pre>
1. When our BIP is down or being bumped
2. As an APEX administrator, in workspace environment settings, the print server is set to OFF.
</pre>
I'm thinking that this is a licensing issue but I need some clarification on what is causing the error, because all we are trying to do is bring up a PDF report that a user can open or save. BIP is not involved at this point. Is it because the report was developed using BIP that APEX needs BIP up? How does APEX even know the report was developed using BIP? Were are using APEX 3.2.1.00.12 and BIP 10.1.3.4.1
The error happens when a user clicks on a PDF icon that calls an "After Submit Process". The following is the code and the report that was created in BIP is loaded into APEX with a "Named Columns (RTF)" layout type.
Alex.
declare
l_xml                         clob;
l_template                    clob;
l_request_blob                blob;
l_response                    blob;
begin
   ...call up a stored proc to populate l_xml with report data
-- Fetch template
select page_template
into   l_template
from   apex_030200.wwv_flow_report_layouts
where flow_id = :app_id
and    report_layout_name = 'pdf_report';
-- Convert CLOB to BLOB
l_request_blob := wwv_flow_utilities.clob_to_blob(l_xml);
-- Call unsupported and undocumented APEX function
l_response :=
    apex_030200.wwv_flow_print_util.convert(
      p_report_data   => l_request_blob,
      p_template      => l_template,
      p_template_type => 'rtf',
      p_output        => 'pdf'
-- Set correct mime type and download response
owa_util.mime_header('application/pdf', false);
htp.p('Content-length: ' || dbms_lob.getlength(l_response));
htp.p('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Claim_details.pdf"');
owa_util.http_header_close;
apex_application.g_page_text_generated := true;
apex_application.g_unrecoverable_error := true;
wpg_docload.download_file(l_response);

See, http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/apex/configure-printing-093060.html
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17556_01/doc/install.40/e15513/otn_install.htm#CBHBJDDE
(excerpt copied here, for you convenience)
7. Enabling Network Services in Oracle Database 11g
By default, the ability to interact with network services is disabled in Oracle Database 11g release 1 (11.1). Therefore, if running Oracle Application Express with Oracle Database 11g release 1 (11.1), use the new DBMS_NETWORK_ACL_ADMIN package to grant connect privileges to any host for the FLOWS_030100 database user. Failing to grant these privileges results in issues with PDF/report printing, specifically, you will get the following error message:
ORA-20001: The printing engine could not be reached because either the URL specified is incorrect or a proxy URL needs to be specified.
Follow the steps mentioned in the Oracle Application Express Installation Guide, Enabling Network Services in Oracle Database 11g. Also refer to the troubleshooting section in case you receive an ORA-44416: Invalid ACL error after running the previous script.

REgarding licensing issues involvng 'Computername' and the use of UpperCase4 vs Lowercase Letters

Does any one know if it would cause problems for the Office 365 software license to be displayed as licensed to an ALL CAPS name like 'MY-FAVORITE-PC' but the computer itself shows the computer name to be 'my-favorite-pc"?
If it does, which one should I change? A couple of people here have had this same problem (which usually occurs when they change to using a different PC for their account) I have to Deactivate their Old PC namer and then install the licnse to
their New OC using whatever name it has.
On more than one system, this has resulted in various odd "failure to contact Microsoft server" issues when activating. The problem continues for 7 days and then their copy of Office starts showing reed warning bards and eventually gets totally
unusable.
However, if I uninstall the office, deactivate the license, and reinstall it once again, it install just fine and acts ok but invariably at some point, the same thing occurs.
On one of them I noticed the difference in the case of the letters used in the computer name and the license name. On others I am wondering about various software add ins for Outlook or some other 3rd part application causing the problem. Whatever
it is, it gets extremely annoying. Officer 365 apparently must run an activation sequence almost constantly while Office 2010 (and I presume 2013) ran it once and were done with it.
Searching Google I have found too many possible reasons along with a lot of people who have had the same problems but no one seems to have the 100% solution. This has only started happening since we switched to Office 365 and only
seems to occur on systems that are changed out to different ones with the same User's 365 Account which is in good standing and has 5 available licenses of which only one is in use.
In the case of the caps vs lowercase I also wonder if changing the name to CAPS on their PC would create additional problems on its own?

Hi Questorfla,
For the Office 365 software license issue, I recommend you can post in dedicated Office 365 Forum to get a better response:
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148.aspx
If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
Best Regards,
Anna Wang

Have the Adobe Muse CC (2014) licensing issues been resolved?

Have the Adobe Muse CC (2014) licensing issues been resolved?
I am patiently waiting for some word on whether I can go ahead a install the new version of Muse CC (2014) software on my systems without running into the quagmire that so many are experiencing. I simply can't afford to run the risk that I will be stuck with a "trial version" for the next 30 days without some assurance from Adobe that they will be able to solve the problems in that time frame. It would be nice if adobe would send out an email that explains the situation to all of it's users so we know what's going on and when the issue is resolved. Collectively we all pay a lot money for these "updates", so I don't think it's to much to ask.
Kind Regards,
wrgould
PS: Please reference this forum discussion - Muse CC 2014 wants Serial Number, though i pay monthly for muse

A screenshot of the error when a site is opened. I've reinstalled, restarted.. etc. Thanks! J

Acrobat 9 - Upgrade Computer OS from Windows XP to 7 - Licensing Issues?

I have a Lenovo laptop that came with Win XP and Acrobat 9 Standard pre-installed, but they gave me the Acrobat installation CD with product key on the back. So after I wipe the HD and insall a new OEM version of Win7 SP1, can I simply install Acrobat from the old CD using the product key, or will I have licensing issues from the re-installation? -- JClarkW

>>The only issue might be if there had been an activation and you did not deactivate it first.<<
I'm sure I would have activated it, to get updates if nothing else, but how do I tell? If so, how do I deactivate it before the OS replacement? -- JClarkW

Please clarify the following license issue

Hello
Please clarify the following license issue
Oracle 10g se license requirement while using a power 6 P520 machine with 2-core 4.2 GHz processor card,4 memory DIMM slots. Are we entitled for paying for one oracle 10g SE license?
many thanks in advance

When you read through that thread, did you see where I linked to and quoted the licensing definitions
Processor: shall be defined as all processors where the Oracle programs are installed and/or running. Programs licensed on a processor basis may be accessed by your internal users (including agents and contractors) and by your third party users. For the purpose of counting the number of processors which require licensing for a Sun UltraSPARC T1 processor with 4, 6 or 8 cores at 1.0 gigahertz or 8 cores at 1.2 gigahertz for only those servers specified on the Sun Server Table which can be accessed at http://oracle.com/contracts , “n” cores shall be determined by multiplying the total number of cores by a factor of .25. For the purposes of counting the number of processors which require licensing for AMD and Intel multicore chips, “n” cores shall be determined by multiplying the total number of cores by a factor of .50. For the purposes of counting the number of processors which require licensing for all hardware platforms not otherwise specified in this section, a multicore chip with "n" cores shall be determined by multiplying "n" cores by a factor of .75. All cores on all multicore chips for each licensed program for each factor listed below are to be aggregated before multiplying by the appropriate factor and all fractions of a number are to be rounded up to the next whole number. When licensing Oracle programs with Standard Edition One or Standard Edition in the product name, a processor is counted equivalent to a socket.
It appears that you fall under the "not otherwise specified" category because you're not dealing with an UltraSPARC T1 (multiplier 0.25) or an AMD/ Intel chip (multiplier 0.5) so your multiplier would be 0.75.
0.75 * 2 cores = 1.5 processors which would have to be rounded up to 2 processors. If you had 4 total cores, you would only need a 3 processor license.
Justin

9.3.0.1 Permanent Licensing Issue

I am trying to use an old VMware image that contains Planning 9.3.0.1, but I am having licensing issues.
Steps taken already
1) I went to http://licensecodes.oracle.com/downloads/HS9_MasterLicenseFile.zip and download the new license file.
2) Then went to the license manager (LMtools.exe) and was successful starting and stopping the license server and re-reading the license.
3) Then went to the Configuration Utility and Activated the Product to change the Deployment ID to "Temp-0004" within System 9 BI+, Analytical Services, Financial Management and Planning.
Where I see the errors
1) In my debugging of the issue, I tried starting the Hyperion Planning via command line. Planning starts up fine but no longer accepts the requests.
Error Text: "CLS0000017 No unexpired licenses are available for your product. No further requests to the server will be processed."
2) Also within workspace when I go from Navigate -> Application -> Planning -> PlanApp1 I receive the follow error when I try to login.
Error Text: "A problem with Hyperion System 9 Planning license was encountered. Please see the log for details."
Any suggestions?

I'm attaching the instructions I put together about a year ago -- your mileage may vary:
Instructions to update the 9.3 Demo Drives to new license files.
copy HS9_MasterLicenseFile.lic C:\HYSL\common\LicenseServer\Licenses
move C:\HYSL\common\LicenseServer\Licenses\NA_HYSL_Demo_Disk_beckett_01_18_2007_ga.lic C:\HYSL\common\LicenseServer\NA_HYSL_Demo_Disk_beckett_01_18_2007_ga.lic.bak
Copy HS9_SA_MasterLicenseFile.lic C:\HYSL\common\LicenseStandalone\Licenses
move C:\HYSL\common\LicenseStandalone\Licenses\NA_HYSL_Demo_DiskSA_beckett_01_18_2007_as.lic C:\HYSL\common\LicenseStandalone\NA_HYSL_Demo_DiskSA_beckett_01_18_2007_as.lic.bak
Execute the Hyperion System 9 Foundation / Configuration utility
Active the following Products using the default Deployment ID which is *
Hyperion System 9 BI+
Analytic Services
Hyperion System 9 Financial Management
Hyperion System 9 BI+ Enterprise Metrics
Hyperion System 9 Performance Scorecard
Strategic Finance Server
Planning
Verify the DEPLOYMENTID in C:\HYSL\BIPlus\common\config\license.properties
Ensure the DeploymentID matches below exactly.
     #License keys for BI+
     #Wed Feb 13 21:05:27 EST 2008
     licenseServerPath=@demodrive
     DeploymentID=*
     licenseStandalonePath=C\:\\HYSL\\common\\LicenseStandalone\\Licenses
Reboot
Start Planning
Login
If Login provides license error, perform below steps:
1) Run: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\80\Tools\Binn\isqlw.exe
2) Connect as Windows Authenticated User
3) In SQL window:
use pln
update HSPSYS_PROPERTIES set PROPERTY_VALUE='*' where PROPERTY_NAME like 'DE%';
4) Highlight the two lines and press F5 to execute the SQL update.
Regards,
-John

SAP HR Active Sync Issue

Hi,
I encountered SAP HR Active Sync issue: The IDM seems can't receive the IDOC but SAP side says the data already passed to port OK.
I enabled the verbose mode of the Active Sync logs and it is repeating:
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: IDOCs of message type HRMD_A will be processed.
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: {jco.server.gwhost=10.153.3.20, jco.server.progid=IDMRFC, jco.server.gwserv=sapgw01, jco.server.trace=1, jco.server.unicode=1}
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: Started IDocServer (IDMRFC)
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: Done initializing SAPHRActiveSync resource adapter.
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: SARunner: loop 0
2009-06-04T17:07:08.812+0800: Started, paused until Thu Jun 04 17:07:08 GMT+08:00 2009
2009-06-04T17:07:13.812+0800: Pause completed
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: Polling
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: Poll complete.
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: SARunner: loop 1
SAP side transaction WE02 shows the IDOC:
IDoc sent to SAP system or external program: Data passed to port OK
SAP HR Active Sync resource reference says:
1. Enter transaction code PFAL.
2. Insert the Object Type P for person objects.
3. Enter an Employee's ID for the Object ID or select a range of employees.
4. Click Execute.
5. Ensure that the status is set to passed to port okay.
6. The IDoc has been created. Check the Active Sync adapter log file to verify that
an update was received.
Now why I can't see the IDOC logs in the active sync adaptor log file?
Thanks!

Hi Wushilin,
Did you ever find a solution to this?
Thanks

SAP NW PI license issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for