SAP Production order TECO double status - active & inactive

Hi,
I have a question, please advise, if I need to be worried on this,
TECO job ran and put in a TECO status on the production order on 31/1/2015
CLOSE job ran and put in CLSD status on the production order on 02/1/2015
But when I see the production order hear - Status change, i see in the TECO section two entries - Active and Inactive. The date on the Active is the actual date when the TECO job ran and the date on the Inactive is the date when the CLOSE job ran.
Any insight into why the system shows this way. thank you

Hi,
This is correct process, no need to worry.
The active status was TECO. You can see your REL status was made Inactive on that day.(31/1).
When you closed the order, TECO became inactive and superior status CLOSE became active.
Thanks
Prem

Similar Messages

  • In production order can the status of TECO ,in menu bar can be deactivated

    Hi
    In production order can the status of TECO /REVOKE TECO in menu bar can be deactivated .if it can be done where to do the setting and what is it implications
    regards
    madan

    Hi Sarvan,
    We are using the version ECC6.0. I want the authorisation of "revoke close" for some of the users only. Is it possible? If yes, what exactly is the authorisation object.I did not find any object as  SAP-Security.
    Is it possible to control it by any user exit.
    Kindly let me know ASAP.
    Regards,
    Satyajit

  • Performance Issue, Unable to pull all production Orders in given statuses

    HI All,
    I have a requirement to pull all production orders that are in the created or released status and then action some different things in the program such as adjusting dates, etc. The issue I'm having is that as the volume of production orders grows the select statement stops being able to complete and pull these production orders. I've tweaked this before and it was able to work for a few weeks but has now reached it's limit again. I tried using the trace and SE30 to analyze the program as I've read suggested here, however it's been difficult to try adjustments as the program runs in about 3 second in the development environment. Our quality environment, which has roughly half the volume of the production system ran in about 15 seconds. So I am unable to duplicate the issue until the program is moved to production.
    Here is the select statement:
      SELECT k~aufnr
        FROM aufk as k INNER JOIN afko as f ON f~aufnr = k~aufnr
          INNER JOIN jest as j ON k~objnr = j~objnr
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_aufk
        WHERE k~aufnr IN s_aufnr     "Order Number select option
          AND k~werks IN s_werks             "Plant select option
          AND k~auart EQ u2018PP01u2019              "PP01 std orders only
          AND k~kokrs EQ u20181000u2019              "Seneca Controlling Area
          AND k~autyp EQ u201810u2019                "PP Production Order
          AND k~loekz EQ space                 "Deletion indicator
          AND ( j~stat EQ u2018I001u2019             "CTRD, created status
            OR  j~stat EQ u2018I002u2019 )           "REL, released status
          AND j~inact EQ space.              "status not inactive
    There are a couple thoughts I have to try, but I don't know of any good way to verify if helping given the volume differences until in production so am looking for feedback. Here's the ideas:
    1. Use the field IDAT2 in AUFK to determine if an order is not TECO'd , rather than using the JEST table. Testing this in Dev had increased run time versus how I have it written now, but may be helpful with larger volume and/or if an index is put on this field. Thoughts?
    2. Separate the select statements to read AUFK and JEST separately and instead use the FOR ALL ENTRIES command. Seems to be a lot of conflicting thoughts on which works better, thoughts on this particular case?
    Also, there is another program that pulls only production orders in Created status, and it doesn't have this same issue.
    Thanks in advance for any help,
    Kyndal
    Edited by: Kyndal Copley on Oct 1, 2009 6:46 PM

    I have three recommendations for your join.
    1) Assuming that fields AUART and KOKRS are always known (constants) I recommend that you move them up in the where clause (like illustrated) to ensure that the system uses index C.
    2) AUTYP EQ '10' seems superflous. In addition it seems to increase the search time. Check with your functional consultant if there could be a production order with AUART EQ 'PP01' and AUTYP NE '10'. If you will never encounter this situation it makes more sense to drop the clause AUTYP EQ '10'.
    3) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE usually takes longer than INTO TABLE. Define the table with AUFK with just field AUFNR so that you can use the clause INTO TABLE.
    SELECT k~aufnr
      FROM       aufk AS k
      INNER JOIN afko AS f
      ON f~aufnr EQ k~aufnr
      INNER JOIN jest AS j
      ON k~objnr EQ j~objnr
      INTO TABLE it_aufk
      WHERE k~auart EQ 'PP01'
      AND   k~kokrs EQ '1000'
      AND   k~aufnr IN s_aufnr
      AND   k~werks IN s_werks
      AND   k~loekz EQ space
      AND ( j~stat  EQ 'I001' OR j~stat EQ 'I002' )
      AND   j~inact EQ space.

  • Change status(Active/Inactive) of file adapter by the external command

    Hi, all.
      Is it possible to change status(Active/Inactive) of file adapter by the external command?
      Let's say, like
      "$ switch_file_adapter_status.sh <File Adapter name> <active|inactive>"
    or something like that.
      Actually, we have the following requirement for the file adapter.
      For example, we have many "file adapter to R/3" scenarios and we only want to allow data transfer between 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.(R/3 service time).
      In order to achieve this requirement, one option would be to switch file adapter status between active and inactive by external command line.
    And this command will be controlled by the job scheduler(like Tivoli).
      Does XI(3.0 or above) have this kind of feature?
      Best Regards.

    Hi,
    I don't think that this is possible.
    But one Solution for your problem could be a job on xi who execute the Queue.
    So that Adapter work the hole time and send the Message to XI Queue which process them not automatically.
    And the XI Queue you can trigger with a Job like normal R/3 Jobs.
    Hope that helps,
    Regards,
    Robin

  • Import Production orders with released status

    We are using DTW to import production orders. It allows to import as "planned" status only and not as as "released status". We have hundreds of production orders per day and its a pain to update each production order to "released" status so that it can be available for reciepts from production and thereafter after recieving the items, changing each and every production order to "closed". Please advice

    Hi Mohamed,
    please use the following for the production order status in the template.                                                                               
    (1)Planned   :-> boposPlanned                                              
    (2)Released  :-> boposReleased                                             
    (3)Closed    :-> boposClosed                                               
    (4)Cancelled :-> boposCancelled                                                                               
    Please refer to the SDK DI help file for the details information.          
    hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Ladislav
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Transacciu00F3n MFN1 - Error KA465: Production order with an actual activity up

    Hi Exerts,
    I am executing transaction MFN1 with "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" = 2 and the following error ocurrs: "KA465 Production order with an actual activity update.".
    I changed the customizing "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" to "Activity update not relevant to price determination", after this I exectuted transaction MFN1 again and the error didn't occur.
    I need to understand what is the impact of changing this customizing, and if I set the "Update of Activity Consumption..." equal 2, the activity actual values are revaluated in the CKM3N? If the answer is yes, in what point of the CKMLCP this value is revaluated?.
    Regards

    Hi,
    please check CKM9 for the relevant plant how you define the Activity update. Please note KA465 is justified to avoid posting the credits and debits twice if the indicator is '2'.
    If you are using activity update '2', the differences between planned and actual activity prices are not distributed to the orders but via multilevel price determination directly to the materials.
    The system determines the actual prices by means of the multi-level price determination in the actual calculation.
    In the actual calculation, the system also already debits the materials and credits the cost centers or vice versa.
    In this case, the revaluation must not be executed because otherwise the system posts the debits and credits twice. In this case, the system ought to display error message KA465.
    Note 686588 explains under what circumstances error KA465 may be raised, that is, if you have activated Material Ledger/Actual Costing with Activity Consumption '2'. Please check your Material Ledger settings in relation to note 686588.
    If you use activity update '1' then revaluation is done via the orders and no longer via Material Ledger.
    regards
    Waman

  • Production Order TECO status

    Hi all
    I face this peculiar problem. When I TECO a Production order there sometimes the order reservation for components are not wiped out. Why does this happen only sometimes and if this happens how do I remove the component reservation?
    thanks a lot

    Hi
    Usually when you did not reach the upper or lower limits of the order, reservation ermains open.. so first otion to clean up all reservation linkedto the order is to set TECO status.  if it did not clean up all reservation may be caused becuase there are open items in another screen or being handle by another user.
    So you can remove the TECO, and TECO the order once again, just ensure there are no other screen using the order or material.
    Next option is to delete the reservation directly via MB22. sometimes this option is not possible, normally when Reservations are created automatically by the system, in this case only deleting the source of the reservation.
    Final option is to clean only the reservation for a given material, just go to the ordern in change mode, and then to  the material details, and set the flag "on" for the field "Final Issue".
    Hope this helps.
    JC

  • SAP Production Order not closing

    Hi there,
    I am running the COHV with Complete parameter in the background, and it does pick up several TECO orders from the past, like say from 2009 which are not closed but it does not process them to CLSD status.
    I am seeing some entries in COHV, CO1P, COFC transactions - I picked a few randomly to check.
    The order qty is not always equal to the delivered qty - Again a random test
    The consumption qty on the components is not always equal to the required qty, which leaves reservation open - random check
    Is all the above causing my order not to close ? where do I see the error log, when I try to close the order. I wrote the above issues based on my random check.
    Thank you

    Hi SAP Process,
    When you run COHV to close the orders, you can see the log with the list of orders that have not been closed.
    To see in detail what has happened you will need to check order by order.
    Other option will we to evaluate each situation separatelly. You can check COGI, CO1P, see open reservations, check if you have TR or TO if you use WM, etc.. Once each situation is cleaned, you will be able to closed most of your production orders. It is quite common to create a custom report to make all these checks (COGI, TR/TOs, etc) and closed the orders.
    Kind Regards,
    Mariano

  • Production order TECO date..

    Hi All,
    I want to see the TECO date of production order.
    How I can see ?
    Thnx n Rgds,
    Bharat

    Hi Bharat,
    Go in coois in that select list at Header level and status profile as standard Profile and put that order number in order and execute the program you get list in that go in change layout in that select change date and add in column and enter you get the date on which teco was done for that order you also select the Entered By that by same way this is person who done the teco.
    For Error "Change document not active for order" go in T.code OPL8 in that select your order type and plant combination in that on IMPLEMENTATION tab in that active status change document for your order type then this error not come and you see the status changes in the order itself.
    Hope this will solve your problem and reward with point.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Tayade

  • Set Production Order to Release status

    Hi,
    I’m trying to add a new production order through the DI API.  I’m using SAP 2005A SP01 PL 07.  I’m creating it from a sales order.  But if I try to set the status of the Production Order to Release I get a -5002 error.  If I set the status as Planned it works fine.  I’ve also tried creating it, and setting to released after the Production order has been added, which doesn’t work either.  Is there a rule for changing a Production order to Release that I’m missing?  Here is my code:
    ProdOrder.ItemNo = ItemCode
    ProdOrder.CustomerCode = oSaleOrder.CardCode
    ProdOrder.DueDate = oSaleOrder.DocDueDate
    ProdOrder.PlannedQuantity = ItemQuantity
    ProdOrder.ProductionOrderOriginEntry = oSaleOrder.DocEntry
    ProdOrder.ProductionOrderOrigin = BoProductionOrderOriginEnum.bopooSalesOrder
    ProdOrder.ProductionOrderStatus = BoProductionOrderStatusEnum.boposReleased
    ProdOrder.ProductionOrderType = BoProductionOrderTypeEnum.bopotStandard
    ProdOrder.PostingDate = Date.Now

    Tested and working code:
    ProdOrder.ItemNo = "A00009";
                ProdOrder.CustomerCode = "C0001";
                ProdOrder.DueDate = DateTime.Now.AddDays(1);
                ProdOrder.PlannedQuantity = 1;
                ProdOrder.ProductionOrderOrigin = BoProductionOrderOriginEnum.bopooSalesOrder;
                ProdOrder.ProductionOrderStatus = BoProductionOrderStatusEnum.boposPlanned;
                ProdOrder.ProductionOrderType = BoProductionOrderTypeEnum.bopotStandard;
                ProdOrder.PostingDate = DateTime.Now;
                int result = ProdOrder.Add();
                if (result != 0)
                    //Error
                    string error = SBO.DI.Connection.SboCompany.GetLastErrorDescription();
                else {
                    string lastKey = SBO.DI.Connection.SboCompany.GetNewObjectKey();
                    ProdOrder.GetByKey(Convert.ToInt32(lastKey));
                    ProdOrder.ProductionOrderStatus = BoProductionOrderStatusEnum.boposReleased;
                    int result2 = ProdOrder.Update();
                    if (result2 != 0)
                        //Error
                        string error = SBO.DI.Connection.SboCompany.GetLastErrorDescription();
                    else {
                        //OK
    The reason you attempt did not work could be if you did not do the GetByKey. This is needed since an Add just add the data to the database, but does not ready the just added object for continued work (does not provide the docEntry and other autofilled data)
    Message was edited by: Rasmus Jensen

  • Production Order TECO

    Hi All
    I am trying to TECO the confirmed production order at that I am receiving the info
    THERE ARE STILL REPROCESSING RECORDS. SET ORDER TO TECHNICALLY COMPLETE.
    so I am unable to TECO the production order.
    The order which I am trying to TECO has two operation one with Assembly and QM verification.
    Assemply operation status : CNF.
    QM verification                   : REL
    The Error I am receiving is POST PROCESSING for the ORDER prevents TECO.
    please help me to TECO the order.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Madhan,
    Clear the Error records using  below t.code for that Prod  order Number and try to set TECO status.
    COGI
    COFC
    CO1P
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Track production order ststes histry (Status change date, time, user)

    I want to track a production order status change history. Status change date, user name and status. Appreciate if somebody can give me a T Code, SAP report or a table.

    HI,
    You can see the the date, time and user for the status changes by following the menu path given by Mr. Mangalraj.
    However if you cant see them, then check the T Code OPL8 (for PP and COR4 for PI), implementation tab. Tick the check boxes for for Status Change Documents as your choice (for header, operations etc).
    After checking these boxes you will be able to see the status change details.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Rohit.

  • Urgent- production order error- ERTR status

    Dear PP Gurus
    i have an urgent production issue, we have full fledged WM implemented and production order components are issued automatically when order is released via a Pick list 
    Now the problem is that the BOM components are NOt correctly staged during picking
    after the order is released , the status shows <u><b>ERTR- Error in transfer requirements</b></u>, so how should i solve this error
    i have created production supply areas and maintained supply areas in MRP=2 views, i have also created Control Cycles for all the materials
    please help and appreciate your valuable expertise on how to solve this urgent issue
    thanks in advance
    regards
    Chakri<u></u>

    Hi Chakri
    Check production schedulign profile, Did you maintain WM in that
    also check in Control cycle ,staging ind. shd be "1"
    Cheers
    bala

  • Production Order Operations System Status

    Hello Friends,
    I want to include Production order operations status in customized report. Can you pls suggest me how to fetch Operations status since I am unable to find the same from any of the Production Order Operation table (AFVC, AFRU, AFVU, AFRH etc) Also JEST, TJ02 tables provide Prod  Order header level status. I want to fetch Operation level status.
    Hope to have your valuable inputs for the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Tejas

    Dear Mr Brahmankar & Mr Vivek,
    Thanks for your answers.
    I am working with the ways you suggested.
    In case any issue will ask to you.
    I really appreciate your timely help.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • No request generated for batch status active/ inactive settings

    Dear Experts ,
    When is make the status "active " for batch in IMG , Logistics general , Batch management , Specify Batch Level and Activate Status Management,Define Batch Status management  , THE SYSTEM DOESNT ASK FOR A REQUEST .
    Plsease tell em if it is ok for the system to NOT TO ASK FOR A CHANGE REQUEST ?
    IF yes , please let me know if we need to directly  make the above settings in the [production server ???????
    Regards
    Anis

    any response ?

Maybe you are looking for