SAP Query - material costs split by labour/ingredients

Hi,
Is it possible to create a SAP query to show the following;
Material / Lab unit cost / Material lab cost
I'd also like to be able to select r show 1 or 2 cost variants.
I essentially need a list of materials and their costs broken down into their constituent parts.
How can I do this please?
Thanks

Hi Commandante
You can not have WIP split in the FI GL accounts.....
However, there is a work around possble which can give you the break up in report
You need to do small tweaking to get WIP by cost component
1. Define as many LINE IDs as your cost components in OKTZ
2. For eg: If you have cost components like raw material, packing material, labor, machine cost.... then define similar LINE IDs and do the relevant configuration for WIP as per these line IDs.... Assign the specific cost elements in WIP config instead of masking....
3. Assign cost comp str in OKN0 and choose product group = Material Group.. Transport it to production
4. Run KKRV to collect the data
5. Now run the WIP reports in KKO0
When you execute your KKO0 reports, WIP would be with the same breakup as your cost components
This is a tried and tested approach!!
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • Split the material cost into labor and overhead costs

    Hello Experts,
    We get Finished Goods from another plant and that plant is not on SAP. So we load these materials as Finished Goods and enter the price in the costing tab and we do run cost estimates. In the cost estimate we see this price as material cost. How can we split this material cost into material + labor + over head costs? Is there anywhere we can enter the percentages that would split the total price into material and labor and overhead prices? I appreciate your time and response.
    Thanks In Advance

    HI Venkat,
    You can only split material cost using origin groups and not into material, labour & OH as you may know the cost components are grouping of cost elements (with an option to use origin groups).
    If this is too important for you to maintain that cost component split, then I see the only way is to consider maintaining quantity structure in SAP for the finished product, so that cost roll up happens with cost components.
    Hope this helps.

  • Raw Material Costing with Actual Cost Component Split

    Hi All
    I have requirement to split inventory RM Value with material component and Freight cost, all config done and looks well if I check at CKM3N cost component view, material cost $100 and Freight $20, I GR the inventory with freight cost, since I'm using actual costing when journal freight cost go to Price Difference account. But after actual costing closing why the system can't split the variance update to freight cost component? is this the standard SAP behaviour?
    Please help for the solution
    Regards
    Luiz

    I see that you want to split your material cost and freight cost. you need to check the following:
    Is your current standard cost estimate support this structure i.e do you have seperate cost components for RM and Freight.
    If not first you need to change cost component structure and as mentioned by owen you to map the purchase condition type to the origin group and cost component structure.
    Then system will do the same for the actual costing

  • Raw Material Cost Estimate - No split between cost component

    Dears,
    I need to execute a material cost estimate considering the Purchasing Info Record (PIR) where 3 different conditions are present:
    1) PB00
    2) FRB1
    3) RUC1
    The scope is:
    - linking PB00 to cost component 1
    - linking FRB1 to cost component 2
    - linking RUC1 to cost component 3
    Cost components are already created.
    I did following steps:
    - creation PIR with these 3 conditions (transaction ME11)
    PB00  10,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    FRB1   2,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    RUC1   3,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    - link condition types to origin groups (transaction OKYO)
    FRB1 linked to FRB1
    RUC1 linked to RUC1
    - link origin groups to cost component (transaction OKTZ)
    PB00, is linked to cost component 1 without origin group, but using only account coming from T030 table 
    FRB1 is linked to cost component 2 using origin group FRB1 and the same acocunt used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table
    RUC1 is linked to cost component 3 using origin group RUC1 and the same acocunt used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table
    At this moment, when I try to execute the cost estimate with transaction CK11N, the split is not done, and all condition types (all amounts) are linked to cost component 1. The set-up done in OKYO is not considered by the system.
    In the material master there's any origin group, if I try to fill in origin group FRB1 all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 2, and if I try to change the origin group in the material master from FRB1 to RUC1, all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 3 --> this means that the set-up done OKTZ is correctly considered by the system to link the origin group to the cost components.
    The problem is that the system reads the origin group from the material master, instead of transaction OKYO.
    How can I solve this problem?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jody

    Pl verify following two things -
    Check valuation variant.
    Strategy sequence should have 'L - Price from purchasing info-record' and Sub-strategy should be 'A Quotation price via condition table' or 'B PO price via condition table'.
    OKYO setting should have valuation variant associated with your costing variant, along with other details (dont leave that field blank).
    Let us know if that works.
    Regards,
    Subodh

  • Split Valuation Material Cost Estimate into COPA

    Hi all,
    Is there any way how we can transfer the split valuation material cost estimate into COPA?
    I checked the actual line items, there is no "valuation type / batch" characteristics there.
    Is this the main cause?
    Please kindly suggest on the best way to solve this issue
    Thank you very much
    Regards, Erwin

    Hi, Ajay
    Does this mean that, even though i manage to create the valuation type as characteristic in COPA, i won't be able to get 2 different cost estimate based on valuation type into COPA?
    Hm, then, are there any solutions which can be done to solve this issue?
    The client needs a COPA report which can show the breakdown of the sold materials cost estimates
    As usual, thank you very much for your help
    Regards, Erwin

  • How the raw material cost is picked in product cost in case of split materi

    how the raw material cost is picked in product cost in case of split material in BOM

    Hi
    In case of Std cost (CK11N), the planned price or MAP that you enter in the Parent accounting View will be considered for the cost calcualtoin purpose
    Parent view means the view which is above the 2 or more valuation types which consists of avg value of all other val types
    Ajay M

  • Display only the last record per material in SAP query

    Hi,
    I have created a SAP Query using the quickviewer that is a join between 2 tables (MSEG and MKPF) that consist of material document information and date of posting.
    The results are fine however I would like only the last record per material to be displayed.
    Can anyone tell what do I need to add so for only the last record per material be displayed in the output.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Hi Mark,
    May be if you use Control Level processing .........I think you will be able to get the result you want. Try displaying as Below,
    LOOP AT XXXXX.
    AT FIRST material.
    ENDAT.
    AT LAST material.
    *...Display what ever you want here. It will display at end of every material.
    ENDAT.
    ENDLOOP.
    Before using sort the table with key material in ascending.
    Hope what I had to say is helpful to you.
    Cheers,
    Raga Suman.

  • Cannot bring material cost, labour, overhead to copa

    Dear Forum,
    Why it is saying that cannot bring material cost, labour, overhead to copa?
    "In all the system COGS clearing account exists.......but for COPA, condition type VPRS is attached to cost element Cost of Goods Sold because you can not bring all the cost like material, labour, overhead into COPA.....so all procuring cost flows to VPRS condition type and in turn COGS is deducted from the sales revenue to derive Gross Profit...."
    Thanks alot.

    Hi
    Please go throgh the below mentioned link
    Cost Component Structure in COPA
    Hope this will help you
    Regards
    Praveen P C

  • Material on SAP Query

    Hi,
    I need material on SAP Query (not BW!!).
    Can you provide me with a link, or training material?
    Thank you.
    Tad

    You can use simple SAP Querry from SQVI , but it is client dependant and user dependant can not be transportable.
    use MARA, MARC,MBEW combination with outer loop option to get maximum results.
    Paartha

  • Split valuation / material costing

    Hi all
    I am valuating a raw material twice since in-house production( 50 INR) and external procurement(100 INR). Material code is same as usual. This material is used to make a fert material and is to be included in costing. If then, which valuation type will the system take?
    Yuvi.

    costing depends on the usage of the material with split valuation
    Eg . Material : AAA
    Inhouse material cost -- Rs 50 -valuation type :XXX
    External procurment - Rs 100-Valuation Type :YYY
    you are assembling this material AAA  and FERT is made
    Fert Material : CCC
    BBB  :inhouse machining cost -Rs 25.00
    costing of CCC:if you
    inhouse material then -> 50+25.00-75.00
    External procurement -100+25.00->125.00
    Hope it is clear
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • How SAP use transfer control or material cost estimate

    Hello!
    I have strategy "3-Previous standard cost estimate" in transfer control material cost estimate.
    I have cost estimate for product AAA with status KA and costing date from 01.01.2014.
    Product AAA produced from component BBB.
    Component BBB has two cost estimates with costing date from 01.01.2014 and 01.02.2014.
    I run cost estimate for product AAA with costing date from 06.03.2014.
    Cost estimate not use existing cost estimate for component and create new cost estimate.
    In help.sap.com contains next information about transfer strategy 3 - The system searches for existing previous cost estimate.
    why my system does not use the existing cost estimate for component?
    Thanks for attention.

    Thanks, Szymon!
    I use russian interface and read russian help. Where stragegy 3 has name "Прошедшая плановая калькуляция" which means "The last planned cost estimate".
    This led me astray.
    In english help i read next:
    Previous standard cost estimates
    The system searches for an existing previous standard cost estimate.
    You are completely right!
    two more questions:
    - We can not use strategy 3 if we not realesed cost estimate as standard price?
    - What strategy we should use for transfer material cost estimate with status KA?
    Thanks

  • PM Labour Cost Splitting Programme

    Hi All,
    can any body please let me know ,based up on cost centre (KOSTL) ,cost element (KSTAR) and posting date (BUDAT) ,
    How to get the functional location (TPLNR). Its quite urgent
    please let me know if any body knows............
    Best Regards,
    Kiranvasu.

    Hi Gangadhar,
    Just revisit what you are asking for. You are different types of Costs onto the Order and you don't want to settle certain Costs at all...It's not the correct Business Practice.
    When you are loading the Costs onto the Order, you will be able to see in the Order Analysis all the Costs seperately represented by respective Cost Elements.
    Ideally, during the Period-End, all the Costs must be settled to required Cost Objects. You have the flexibiltiy to choose the Settlement Receiver Objects in the Allocation Structure. Even if you want to settle the Material Costs to one Cost Center, Labour Costs to another Cost Center etc, you can design your Allocation Structure accordingly.
    But, once you loaded the Labour Cost and thinking that it should not get Settled, if you delete these Cost Elements in the Allocation Structure, at the time of Settlment of the Order in the Period-End, you will get an Error Message saying the "Complete your Allocation Structure : && Cost Element cannot be assigned"...etc.
    So, there is no way that you can ommit certain Cost Elements (Labour Cost in your case) from being settled. When you say, you want to see the Labour Costs intact after Settlment...what do you mean by that? Even after Settlment, you will be able to see how much Labour Cost has been loaded onto the Order. If you mean, the Labour Cost should remain as a Balanace on the Order forever, It's not Best Business Practice and no Client will accept that.
    Discuss with your Core Team / Process Owner once again about the exact requirment.
    Revert back for further assistance...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Report to fetch the labour cost and material cost

    Hi Gurus,
    The requirement is to create a report to fecth the actual cost from the maintenance order. ie.. material cost , labor cost and some other costs which are directly posted to the order. Can anybody let me know from which tables I can pull the material cost , labor cost ..etc posted against maintenance order?
    Regards,
    John

    Hi
    can you check in PMCO table
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Help needed on creating a SAP query

    Hi All,
    Can somebody give me the step by step procedures of creating a SAP query and Infoset.
    My requirement is to display asset master details with Asset number or Asset class as input.
    Any pointers or links to create an infoset and query will br highly helpful.
    Thanks,
    Arun

    Here are couple of fields you might be needed :
    AGKO     Cleared Accounts
    ANAR     Asset Types
    ANAT     Asset type text
    ANEK     Document Header Asset Posting
    ANEP     Asset Line Items
    ANEV     Asset downpymt settlement
    ANKT     Asset classes- Description
    ANLA     Asset Master Record Segment
    ANLB     Depreciation terms
    ANLC     Asset Value Fields
    ANLH     Main asset number
    AT02T     Transaction Activity Category- Description
    AT02A     Transaction Code for Menu TIMN
    AT10     Transaction type
    AT10T     Name of Transaction Type
    BKDF     Document Header Supplement for Recurring Entry
    BKORM     Accounting Correspondence Requests
    BKPF     Accounting Document Header
    BLPK     Document log header
    BLPP     Document log item
    BLPR     Document Log Index and Planned Order (Backflush)
    BNKA     Bank master record
    BP000     Business Partner Master (General Data)
    BPBK     Doc.Header Controlling Obj.
    BPEG     Line Item Total Values Controlling Obj.
    BPEJ     Line Item Annual Values Controlling Obj.
    BPEP     Line Item Period Values Controlling Obj.
    BPGE     Totals Record for Total Value Controlling obj.
    BPJA     Totals Record for Annual Total Controlling Obj.
    BSAD     Accounting- Secondary Index for Customers (Cleared Items)
    BSAK     Accounting- Secondary Index for Vendors (Cleared Items)
    BSAS     Accounting- Secondary Index for G/L Accounts (Cleared Items)
    BSEC     One-Time Account Data Document Segment
    BSEG     Accounting Document Segment
    BSID     Accounting- Secondary Index for Customers
    BSIK     Accounting- Secondary Index for Vendors
    BSIM     Secondary Index, Documents for Material
    BSIS     Accounting- Secondary Index for G/L Accounts
    CEPC     Profit Center Master Data Table
    CEPCT     Texts for Profit Center Master Data
    COBRA     Settlement Rule for Order Settlement
    COBRB     Distribution Rules Settlement Rule Order Settlement
    COKA     CO Object- Control Data for Cost Elements
    COSP     CO Object- Cost Totals for External Postings
    COSS     CO Object- Cost Totals for Internal Postings
    CRCO     Assignment of Work Center to Cost Center
    CSKA     Cost Elements (Data Dependent on Chart of Accounts)
    CSKB     Cost Elements (Data Dependent on Controlling Area)
    CSLA     Activity master
    FEBEP     Electronic Bank Statement Line Items
    FPLA     Billing Plan
    FPLT     Billing Plan- Dates
    GLPCT     EC-PCA- Totals Table
    KNA1     General Data in Customer Master
    KOMK     Pricing Communication Header
    MAHNV     Management Records for the Dunning Program
    REGUT     TemSe - Administration Data
    SKA1     G/L Account Master (Chart of Accounts)
    SKAT     G/L Account Master Record (Chart of Accounts- Description)
    SKB1     G/L account master (company code)
    T003T     Document Type Texts
    T007S     Tax Code Names
    T087J     Text
    TAPRFT     Text tab. for investment profile
    TKA01     Controlling Areas
    TKA09     Basic Settings for Versions
    TKVS     CO Versions
    TZB0T     Flow types text table
    TZPAT     Financial Assets Management product type texts
    VBSEGS     Document Segment for G/L Accounts Document Parking
    VTBFHA     Transaction
    VTBFHAPO     Transaction Flow
    VTBFHAZU     Transaction Activity
    VTBFINKO     Transaction Condition
    VTIDERI     Master Data Listed Options and Futures
    VTIFHA     Underlying transaction
    VTIFHAPO     Underlying transaction flows
    VTIFHAZU     Underlying transaction status table
    VTIOF     Options Additional Data
    VWPANLA     Asset master for securities

  • Valuation using material cost estimate

    Ciao a tutti,
    We have create a material cost
    estimate without standard structure(unit costing) not FOR ALL MATERIALS, but only for ONE
    VARIANT of generic material (retail solution) (because the other variant have the same price, and because we have to reproduced 5000 BOM in unit cost for just
    one variant with transaction KKPA LSMW)
    So, now we have to valuated the material cost estimate when the customer create the billing document and put the split of the cost estimate in co-pa
    Our prolem is : we have calculate standard cost estimate for 5000
    variant not for all variant (because our customer crete the BOM in unit
    costing with transaction KKPA and LSMW, and they refuced the idea to
    calculate 30000 cost estimate with lsmw) so when we crete a billing
    document with a variant that haven't cost estimate created the system doesn't
    valuated the cost estimate (the system works well), but how I can change the variant in the valuation and put the variant that have the cost
    estimate calculate?
    Wiht the transaction "Assign Costing Keys to Any Characteristics" I think
    is not possible.
    I must to use enhance COPA0002?
    Thank you very much
    Paolo Artini
    tel: +393299223804

    Hi All,
    I am also facing the problem for Sales Order Cost Estimate. and the Costing Status is VO(Marked without errors).
    I have done the following
    created the Costing Key (sales order cost estimate)
    assigned costing key to the material type.
    assigned to the respective value fields
    sales order cost estimate,
    Run the RA
    Settlement done.
    But in COPA, cost estimates are not being split up based on the cost component (like Material, Labour and Over head) and it is getting posted to COGS only.
    Do we need to change the costing status to FR, if yes, but how to do ?
    Regards
    Ramesh KR
    +91 9884020411

Maybe you are looking for