SAPu00AE COMPLIANCE CALIBRATOR BY VIRSA SYSTEMS
Hello all,
My company are thinking of implementing the above for auditing purposes to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and compliance. I have read some documentation from the SAP website and this documentation states that:
"Because SAP Compliance Calibrator by Virsa Systems is embedded in your SAP system, no additional hardware or software is required."
Has anyone implemented this soultion? If so is there any additional documentation available for it?
Cheers,
Bernard.
David,
As We are in the process of implementing this virsa tool but we are not sure as to what are the exact steps that we should extract to. Do you have a step by step guide (apart from the VIRSA install guide) which would guide us through the complete install and configuration. We have ECC 6.0 ,Portal,BI 7,CRM 5
Would you be kind enough to send the information to me asap.
Please forward me the doc to following id , I will be very much appreciate if you could do the help ..
[email protected]
Thanks
Laxmi
Similar Messages
-
Why upgrade from Compliance Calibrator to GRC?
Hello Experts- My company has yet to implement GRC 5.3. We already utilize SAP Compliance Calibrator by Virsa Systems 4.0, which works fine, so what would be the benefit of upgrading to GRC? Is it really necessary? Is it just to stay current? Also, is it true that GRC will be moving from Java back to an ABAP stack? If so, when is the new ABAP version of GRC set to be available?
Thanks for your advice and opinions.Regarding the upgrade from 4.0 to 5.3 I concur with Alpesh and Varun.
Regarding the upgrade to 10.0, current plans are for Ramp-up to be available in December 2010 with general release scheduled for mid 2011.
According to the latest material from SAP, they are only supporting a migration path as follows:
4.0 -->5.3 --> 10.0
There is no supported upgrade path from 4.0 directly to 10.0.
It should be noted that it is a significant change in architecture and therefore not a simple migration path. SAP are recommending an upgrade to 5.3 followed by a migration to 10.0 for the technical side of things.
5.3 does still have some significant advantages over 4.0 and therefore is still an option. owever, if you wish to register your interest, SAP are seeking ramp up customers so I would suggest you contact your Consultants or account management within SAP to discuss the options if you are considering it.
Simon -
4.6C to ECC 6.0 upgrade - Issue with Virsa Compliance Calibrator
The issue is that phase IS_SELECT during the PREPARE is not detecting VIRSA as an add-on. This of course will result in VIRSA not being upgraded and the system will be unstable ( note 989368 ). Also, I can't choose to delete the add-on either.
We installed the compliance calibrator before SAP purchased VIRSA. So, the tool was installed through transports, not SAINT. I assume this is why phase IS_SELECT is not seeing the tool.
Any ideas?
-ScottReceived a reply from SAP. Since VIRSA was installed through STMS the IS_SELECT phase will not see the add-on. I had to do the ECC 6 upgrade as normal and then install VIRSA 4.0 for SAP 700 systems through SAINT.
I had to clear SPDD and SPAU as much as possible for /VIRSA/* objects. However, there were six objects I could not clear. This did not cause any issues.
Notes 1006083 and 985617 are needed for this procedure.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
-Scott -
Update on Management View in VIRSA Compliance Calibrator 5.2
Hello,
is there a way to delete the Data for the Management View in VIRSA Compliance Calibrator 5.2 and then make a full new data load.
When I select Full Synchronisation and Management Reports in the Schedule Analysis, the system does not update the Management View correctly, the Management Report shows still roles which are already deleted in the SAP-System.
ThanksHi,
You can do a Full sync of Users and Roles first which will be ovewrite and then run the Batch Risk Analysis Management Reports.
You can try this exercise first if it does not work then go ahead with Alpesh's advice.
Thanks
Darshan -
Anyone have Virsa/SAP Compliance Calibrator documentation?
I'd really like a Virsa "Owners Manual", but for now I'd just settle for an explanation of all the parameters contained in table /VIRSA/ZVRATCNFG. Some are self explanatory, some are not. To maintain this table do the following:
1. tcode /n/virsa/zvrat
2. execute
3. menu: compliance calibrator > configuration option
I'd like to know what each parameter does, the possible entries, and the cause and effect result of each entry. Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
MarshallDave,
It appears to me that the only credentials required to access that site are SAP Service Marketplace logon (the so-called 'S number'). You can obtain these from the person in your company that administers your SAP licence (usually a basis person). Or, you can apply yourself at http://service.sap.com/request-user .
It is forbidden in this forum to send copywrited documents from user to user.
Best Regards,
DB49 -
Re: Virsa Compliance Calibrator & Pre-defined SOD Rule Set
Hi All,
We have installed the Virsa Compliance calibrator 5.1 in our sandbox environment. When we goto the "Rule Architect" tab under Compliance calibrator using tcode /virsa/zvrat it brings up the page with Rules information.
Per the Virsa documents that i read they have mentioned that there are pre-defined SOD Rules (Transaction codes and Tcode objects) that we can use in the Rule Architect.
My question is how do i enable and use those pre-set SOD Rules that Virsa provides by default. I do not see them under the Rule architect tab though. Can someone give some pointers to use these pre-set SOD rules.
Thanks & Regards
-MuraliHi Laziz,
Thanks for your patience in replying to my CC 5.1 queries. I did follow your steps for the Generate Rule & Background Job-> Schedule Analysis and scheduled the job immediate.
However, when i looked up the status of the scheduled analysis Background Job-> Search pulls up the job i scheduled at the top it reads "Job scheduler Status: unknown error" . I clicked on "View Log" button and it shows some messages as shown below (Note: I am just posting some parts of the error msgs below. but it still goes for 1 page...)
May 16, 2007 1:09:07 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJobDaemon init
INFO: *** BgJobDaemon loaded
May 16, 2007 1:11:09 PM com.virsa.cc.common.util.ConfigUtil setDefaultJ2EEParam
WARNING: Cannot get Application URL: null. PLEASE SET 'Background Daemon URL' IN CONFIGURATION TAB
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.virsa.cc.common.util.ConfigUtil.setDefaultJ2EEParam(ConfigUtil.java:203)
at com.virsa.cc.common.util.ConfigUtil.getBgJobStartURL(ConfigUtil.java:192)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.AnalysisDaemonThread.run(AnalysisDaemonThread.java:45)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: class name: com.virsa.cc.extreport.ReportPack50SP1_01.ReportPack50SP1_01 class: com/virsa/cc/extreport/ReportPack50SP1_01/ReportPack50SP1_01.class
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: Jar Entry length=1568 compressed size=1568 actual read=1568
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: class name: com.virsa.cc.extreport.ReportPack50SP1_01.CrtActbyRsk_Act_RskLvl class: com/virsa/cc/extreport/ReportPack50SP1_01/CrtActbyRsk_Act_RskLvl.class
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: Jar Entry length=13210 compressed size=13210 actual read=13210
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: class name: com.virsa.cc.extreport.ReportPack50SP1_01.CrtRolbyRsk class: com/virsa/cc/extreport/ReportPack50SP1_01/CrtRolbyRsk.class
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: Jar Entry length=19287 compressed size=19287 actual read=19287
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: class name: com.virsa.cc.extreport.ReportPack50SP1_01.CrtProfbyRsk class: com/virsa/cc/extreport/ReportPack50SP1_01/CrtProfbyRsk.class
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: Jar Entry length=12807 compressed size=12807 actual read=12807
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: class name: com.virsa.cc.extreport.ReportPack50SP1_01.UsersbyOrgLevels class: com/virsa/cc/extreport/ReportPack50SP1_01/UsersbyOrgLevels.class
May 16, 2007 1:24:37 PM com.virsa.cc.extreport.JarClassLoader loadClassData
FINEST: Jar Entry length=18557 compressed size=18557 actual read=18557
May 16, 2007 1:24:59 PM com.virsa.cc.common.util.ConfigUtil setDefaultJ2EEParam
WARNING: Cannot get Application URL: null. PLEASE SET 'Background Daemon URL' IN CONFIGURATION TAB
java.lang.NullPointerException
I am not sure whats causing this and it's been 2hrs since i scheduled the user analysis but i don't see any data still appearing in the fron-end..Any pointers again???
Thanks
-Murali -
Compliance Calibrator v4.0 - Cross System SoD Analysis
Hi all,
I'm looking to run SoD analysis across BI7 and ERP using Compliance Calibrator v4.0. I can see the Parameter in the config overview, and have set it to yes is both systems. But there is nothing else in the documentation as to what other config etc is needed. Does anyone now the steps involved or could you point me in the direction of documentation.
Thanks in advance,
FionaHi,
there is a difference only if you have created and assigned mitigation controls to users.
In that case, you can decide to see the report of SOD conflicts with or without mitigation controls:
- Either you see all SOD conflicts including these that are mitigated (it is however clearly stated in the report whether a mitigation control exists or not)
- Or you see all SOD conflicts excepted these that are mitigated (we consider thus that mitigated conflicts should not appear in the report)
Rgds,
Karim -
Hi All
Can anyone help. I want to know if anyone has any documentation/ and or screen shots on Versa, as I know nothing about it.
Thanks in advance. You can send info to [email protected]
MarkHi Leandro
Thank you for your reply. I require as much info on 5.1 as you can get. I know nothing about the compliance calibrator and I want to rectify that.
Thanks
Mark -
Is Compliance Calibrator the same as GRC Access Control?
I have been asked to look at<b> Compliance Calibrator </b>and am getting confused about what functionality is offered. I have done the basic e-learning course for Compliance Calibrator (GRC200): this was all about separation of duties etc. Fair enough. But I also have a Document called "<b>SAP GRC Access Control</b>" which talks about the same S.O.D compliance functionality but also talks of "roles triggering workflows", "users creating roles", "automated approvals for roles" eg:
"SAP GRC Access Control streamlines access requests by filling each request automatically with user identity information from a lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP) directory or HR database, thereby eliminating the need for user intervention. Approvers receive an e-mail with a direct hyperlink to the request inside the application, where they can easily view and approve the request. The application then checks for security violations before updating accounts automatically."
None of this was covered on the Compliance Calibrator course, so what product offers this? I can see another product by Virsa called <b>Access Enforcer</b> but have no info on this... can anyone enlighten me?SAP GRC Access Control is the SAP application that comprises the former Virsa products Compliance Calibrator, Access Enforcer, Risk Terminator, Firefighter and Role Expert.
-
Custom report on Compliance Calibrator Job scheduler
Currently in compliance calibrator it is not possible for a user to view the status, success or otherwise, of another users scheduled job or sync unless granting that user full administrator rights.
Please advise if it's possible to expose the underlying scheduled job table for a given system via a custom built static html web page. Can you advise of the table that results would need to be displayed from and whether there would be any drawbacks of this approach, or if others have somehow solved this problem with another solution, please share?!
What are SAP's timeframe's for finer grained security in CC?below are the tables used for CC:
VIRSA_CC_ACTRULE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ACTRULHDR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ACTVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ADMIN SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ALLASTRUN SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ALLISTDTL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ALLISTHDR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ALTCDLOG SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_AUTHHT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_AUTHMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BKGINP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUAPPVR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUMONITOR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUSPRC SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUSPRCT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUSUNIT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_BUSUNITT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CDHDR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CDPOS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CGROUP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CONFIG SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRACT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRACTT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRACTVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRPRM SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRPRMVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRPROF SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRPROFT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRROLE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRROLET SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_CRROLEVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_DATAEXD SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_DETDESC SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FLDMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNC SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNCACT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNCBP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNCSYS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_FUNCT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GENACT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GENOBJ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GENOBJT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GENPRM SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GENUSR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GPRMLIST SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_GSEQ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_JOBHST SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_LASTRUN SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_LOCKTABLE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_LSYSGRP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGALERTS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGCRTR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGMTBU SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGMTTOT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGRISKD SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MGRISKS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICCTLDTL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICCTLDTT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICEXLOG SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICORGDTL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICORGDTT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICPRCDTL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICPRCDTT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICRMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MICUMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITHROBJ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITMON SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITPROF SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITREF SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITREFT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITRISK SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITROLE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITRPT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITUSER SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MITUSRORG SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MONAPV SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MSG SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MSGPRMS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_MSGTYP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_OBJTEXT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ORGRULE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ORGRULEM SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ORGRULET SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ORGUSERS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_PRMRULE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_PRMVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RISK SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RISKFUNC SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RISKOWN SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RISKRS SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RISKT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_ROLEVL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RTMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RULESET SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_RULESETT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SAPOBJ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SCHEDULER SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SUPP_DET SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SUPP_HDR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SUPP_TEXT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSCRACT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSHMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSRULE SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSSAPOBJ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSTEM SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSTEMC SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSTEMT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_SYSUSR SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_TEXTKEY SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_THREAD SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_USRMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_VARIANT SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_VARVAL SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_WFOBJ SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_XSRULEMAP SAPSR3DB
VIRSA_CC_XSYSGRP SAPSR3DB
You can go and check which one contains the scheduling info (VIRSA_CC_SCHEDULER ??)
Hope this helps -
Convert from Compliance Calibrator 4.0 to Risk Analysis and Remediation 5.2
Hello Forum,
I'm looking for other opinions on converting Compliance Calibrator (CC) 4.0 to Risk Analysis and Remediation (RAR) 5.2 (formerly CC)
I have inherited responsibility for RAR and need to upgrade it to the 5.2 level; our current ECC level prevents us from going to 5.3
I found a process that will unload the data from CC 4.0 and be imported into RAR 5.2
I want to understand the definitions that comprise the RAR and was thinking about recreating the definitions in 5.2 based on what is already defined in the CC 4.0 system; I have time to do this since there is no definitive deadline that would make it impossible to meet
Currently, I have the following definitions:
Business Process 6 entries
Functions 47 entries
Risks 147 entries
Mitigating Controls 40 entries
Would others find this approach acceptable and reasonable even though I would be entering all the information? Basically, it would be like defining the data for the very first time if this was NEW software
I would expect to come away with a good understanding of how everything ties together; at this point, I am only looking to create the necessary data that would allow for producing SOD reports that show all users with "risks" have been mitigated with acceptable controls
Thanks for your responses in advance
Jerry
Ryerson, Inc
630-758-2021Thanks for the reply
I have the migration guide and have reviewed it; I have actually played around a bit with obtaining the file from CC 4.0; I found that the data records may need some adjustments to be compatible with RAR 5.2; one of the reasons that may be leading me to do everything from scratch
The definitions currently defined were completed by an outside source and the mitigated controls were defined by the Internal Audit area
I'm not sure if they were mixed with the defaults
I'm not sure at this point what impact or changes I would experience if I use the "default" supplied rules set but I expect to find out
Thanks again for your reply
Jerry -
Need some practical Scenarios to test Compliance Calibrator, FF and AE
Hi Experts,
I have installed Compliance Calibrator 5.2 / Access Enforcer and Firefighter on a test System. However i am looking for some practical scenarios / Examples to test the functionlity of these installations. If any of you is currently working on these technologies i appreciate if you c an provide 2 3 scenarios to test my installation and functionality .
Thanks in advance.
Your help is much apprecaited..
SKHi SK,
Testing the functionality of CC
1. I would recommend to create some test roles where in you plug in some conflicting tcodes
which can pose a sure SoD Risk, lets say Create Vendor Invoice(FB01) and Make an
Automatic Payment(F110).
2. Now run the Risk Analysis by choosing the Default SAP GRC ruleset library and do a
Role level Analysis.Then Assign the Test Roles to Test Users and then do a User Level Analysis.
3. You may have create some Custom Rule sets with appropriate naming of Conflicting functions
like Creation of Purchase Order (P001), Approve Purchase Order(P002)
in different Application Areas like Purchase 2 Pay(P2P), Order 2 Cash (O2D) and try to do
the same as above two steps.
4. Test the functionality of Risk Remediation by removing the conflicting tcodes and do the
Risk Analysis.Your previous Risk Roles must not appear
5. Test the functionality of Risk Mitigation by placing a mitigation Control on the Conflicting tcodes
and do the Risk Analysis.Your previous Risk Roles must not appear if you have properly
configured your CC
Testing the functionality of FF
1. I would say create a few Firefighter IDs in different functional areas like FI, SD, MM, and then
create some test users for Firefighter Owners, Controllers and Firefighters who can use
the functionality of FF.
2. Create some FF roles which have exceptional access in those functional areas
encompassing transaction codes and authorization objects that are not used in normal incidents.
3. Assign each of the FF roles to the respective FF IDs and then to the test Firefighters.
4. Pull the log reports in FF and see if it gives exact details of the FF usage.
5. You may have take some assistance of the Functional team members to do the testing.
Testing the functionality of AE
1. Create a workflow scenario of hiring a new user.
2. Create the request under a test requestor. Assign the request to some test approver
3. Also Assign some roles and test the functionality.
Hope this helps for a good start
Regards,
Kiran Kandepalli. -
Updating Compliance Calibrator Rule Set
The business has decided to change a few rules by removing a couple of custom tcodes from the rule set. In DEV I go into the Function and remove the objects associated with the tcode and disable the tcode. After running the rule set update there is still some sort of tie. I have created a test ID in DEV with a known issue around each of the changes. I'm not getting a different result when running compliance calibrator.
Any ideas?
We are running R/3 4.6C and compliance calibrator 4.0Can you please check the following demo?
[Virsa Compliance Calibrator Application for SAP v5.1 Demo|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/d2f1cf9c-0d01-0010-2dac-aedd3c4f7f5b&overridelayout=true]
Please give more details on the step where you got stuck.
Regards,
Dipanjan -
Configuring Role Expert Web services for Compliance Calibrator
Hi @all,
performing the configuration of Virsa Role Expert I've got a question regarding the settings for the various Web Service Info. for the Compliance Calibrator.
Apart from the Web Service URL, user name and password need to be declared. The user guide names 'sapgrc' and 'webuser' as account names.
My question: How do I setup these accounts? Is this an UME-Job - if so: what are the required roles and authorizations for these accounts?
Kind regards,
MartinHi,
the Web Services URLs are:
Web Service Info. for CC Risk Analysis: http://SERVER_NAME:PORT/VirsaCCRiskAnalysisService/Config1?wsdl&style=document
Web Service Info. for CC Transaction Usage: http://SERVER_NAME:PORT/VirsaCCActionUsageService/Config1?wsdl&style=document
Web Service Info. for CC Mitigation Control: http://SERVER_NAME:PORT/VirsaCCMitigation5_0Service/Config1?wsdl&style=document
Web Service Info. for CC Functions: http://SERVER_NAME:PORT/VirsaCCFunction5_0Service/Config1?wsdl&style=document
Web Service Info. for AE Workflow: http://SERVER_NAME:PORT/AEWFRequestSubmissionService_5_2/Config1?wsdl&style=document
Does that answer your question?
Regards,
Martin -
Deleted Roles appearing in Compliance Calibrator (Informer Tab)
Hi
We had deletd some roles from SAP . These roles still show up on complaince calibrator as having high risk violations.
This role was delted a month ago and we also have completed as full sync of the system . Still the roles are appearing in compliance calibrator in the informer tab.
Coudl you please let me know how we can avoid this?instead of running a full synch I would attempt running an incremental synch and run the management reports again. I believe this should do it. I am not sure why the full synch would not work.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Diferença de conversão - Versão 9.0
Bom dia! Prezados, Na versão 9.0, o processo de reconciliação interna foi otimizado e bases que trabalham com moeda do sistema: Dólar Americano ou qualquer outra moeda que não seja real, no momento de gerar o contas a pagar / receber, apresenta a men
-
I've bought 640 rubies pack and have used it. But the day after, my pack ran out. I'd appreciate if you could give me back my pack or help me in any way possible. The Glu Customer Care answer my question; Hello, and thank you for contacting Glu Mobil
-
How can I know or list all methods of a class?
-
Hi. I would like to use iSync with my phone (a Samsung SCH-U540), but iSync says it's "not supported". Am I doing something wrong? It's a recent-model phone, so I'm surprised that it won't work. Any advice? Eric
-
Can we create RCU schemas without the SYSDBA role?
hi, I am trying to create the specific schemas for SOA suite on a remote database, However, I cannot use the SYSDBA role because i don't have acces to sys user! Can I use a normal user (without SYSDBA previliges) such as system to acheave the install