Satelite M30x-129 takes too long to boot

After pressing the power botton ( blue ), it takes up to 15-30min before the laptop start booting, something it hangs @ selecting boot device...
I have changed the RAM, I'm on my way to the processor,
Please I need help with this...
Thanks

Hello
For new spare parts you should contact the nearest ASP. The technicians can order all Toshiba parts and exchange it for you. On the Toshiba website you can search for an ASP:
http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com => Support & Downloads => Find an authorized service provider
Do you have experience how to disassemble a notebook? If yes you can look on eBay for a second hand mainboard. This should be cheaper as a new one and if you have experience with notebooks you can exchange it yourself.
Greets

Similar Messages

  • MAcbook takes too long to boot

    From one day to another our macbook takes too long to boot. The problem is since we push the power button until the first grey apple shows up, it can take up to 30 seconds. Since the apple shows up it boot in a few seconds. All the process up to 1.20 minutes.

    Also... once you are in OS X, go to System Preferences and Startup Disk. Make sure your OS X volume is selected. Sometimes this can change causing your system to look for another startup disk... and it needs to "time out" before it moves on to the next. This is most common after removing a BootCamp installation of Windows... but can happen for any number of reasons.

  • MacBook Pro takes too long to boot

    I have a late-2013, 15" MacBook Pro with retina display.
    It takes a half hour or more to boot if I reboot it after using it for any appreciable amount of time. Sometimes I can get it to boot faster if I boot it in safe mode, or if I interrupt it by powering off a few minutes into the boot process and then restarting it.
    The computer hangs on the white screen with the Apple logo showing and the spinner spinning.
    If I reboot it immediately after it finally boots up, it boots normally.
    I've tried everything I can think of to diagnose and fix this problem. I uninstalled every bit of software I'm not using. I removed unneeded printers and other devices. I removed all my Login items except for DropBox and iTunes Helper.
    I have no startup items (both /LibraryStartupItems and /System/Library/StartupItems are empty, and ~/Library/StartupItems does not exist).
    Before I got the MacBook Pro I had a 2011 MacBook Air. I used the Time Machine backup from the Air to initialize the Pro. I never had any such problem with the Air. I also have a 2013 iMac, which has most of the same software installed on it as my MacBook Pro; the iMac exhibits no issues with booting or any other problems.
    I've repeatedly repaired my disk and permissions. I do it every time I have to boot. It makes no difference.
    At first I thought this was a minor issue I could live with, since I don't reboot my computer every day, but it's become increasingly annoying. On several occasions I've had the computer crash unexpectedly which meant I was out of business for half an hour while I tried to reboot it. Once this happened while I was giving a presentation to a group of people with a projector, which was extremely frustrating. In fact, compared to other Macs I own or have owned in the past, this MacBook Pro crashes a lot more often.
    I've found several other posts about this problem. Is there just some fundamental issue with these MacBook Pros? Is Apple aware of it? Will they be able to fix it with an OS update or a firmware update? How long will I have to wait for that?

    Apple>About This Mac>More Info>Service
    Please read the warranty paperwork that came w/your computer.
    You have 14 days to return the computer w/no questions asked. 
    You have 90 days of FREE phone tech support on top of your standard 1 year warranty unless you also purchased AppleCare which gives you an additional 2 years of coverage plus FREE phone support.
    Strongly suggest that you take FULL advantage of the above before it runs out.  Let Apple deal w/the problems.

  • Computer takes too long ot boot up

    well i have a computer and its a a215-s4747 and when i turn it on , it turns on correclty but when its booting up and its on the page where the microsoft loading bar appears it take like about 3 -4 minutes to boot or load and appear the log in, whe i bought it tool less than a minute to load and now it takse longer..i was told to upgrade my memory from a 1gb  to a 2gb and i did it and it takse longer now than before.   can someone help me please

    Satellite A215-S4747
    it take like about 3 -4 minutes to boot
    What happens when you boot as follows?
    1. Boot into Safe Mode. See Advanced startup options (including safe mode).
    2. Boot normally into another user account. If necessary, create one.
    -Jerry

  • My Toshiba satellite takes too long to boot up

    I bought a Toshiba satellite C855D-S5238 a little over a month ago, and now it when it gets to the part of the boot up where it should show were to input my password it takes about 5 minutes to show up.  However when I boot up in safe mode it is just about instant.

    Satellite C855D-S5238
    Since the system is brand new, Jonathan, I would probably return the hard disk to factory new. If there are still troubles, you know that software does not cause them. See the section Recovering the Internal Storage Drive, which begins on p. 53 of the User's Guide.
       Satellite/Satellite Pro C800 Series User’s Guide
    when I boot up in safe mode it is just about instant.
    If you prefer to start troubleshooting, see what happens when you boot clean.
       1. Open the System Configuration utility (msconfig.exe).
       2. On the General tab, click Selective startup and clear the Load startup items check box.
       3. On the Services tab, click the Hide all Microsoft services check box and click Disable all.
       4. OK out and restart the computer.
    -Jerry

  • Computer take too long to boot up

    Having trouble booting up computer mountain lion

    How slow? Make sure that you have your disk selected as the startup disk in System Preferences>Startup Disk.
    There are a couple of other things you could try if this doesn't work...
    Clinton

  • Mac Pro takes too long to boost up

    I am running Lion OSX Version 10.7.3 and it takes too long to boot up?
    Any sugestions ? How can i fix it to boot faster.
    Thanx

    How long is to long.
    Yes buy an SSD. Yes reinstall from scratch. Add more RAM. Clean out your present system.

  • Takes too long to hibernate when I close the lid - Also random device noise when it boots up

    Hello guys.
    Ever since i've wiped the machine, i've been having these two problems. When I close the lid, it used to go to sleep straight away, but now I can see the sleep light (and the power button) flash and flash, then it goes to sleep.
    When waking up it goes through the lenovo startup screen and resuming windows, then it asks for a password, before I used to open the lid and it would ask me for the password straight away. I know it was going to sleep because I could hear the beep straight away when I closed and opened it, but now it just takes too long.
    Also, everytime I boot up into windows or resume into windows from a sleep state, I can hear the device noise, like something is being plugged in/out. But there is nothing being plugged in or out at the time. I can't get to device manager quick enough to see what it is that is causing it. 
    But all drivers seem okay.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sam.
    EDIT: Also noticed, when the lid is closed, randomly the laptop turns off (hear the beep) an then turns back off again.
    Weird.
     T420 model number: 4180-PR1 with OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
    T420 4180-PR1 - OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Sam,
    is this to do with the T420 model number: 4180-PR1 with OS: Windows 7 64 bit installed on it as in another thread you posted in?
    Maybe you could pop the information into your signature; members like to know which system and OS are involved.  At the top next to Sign Out choose   My Settings > Personal Profile > Personal Information - Signature
    Andy  ______________________________________
    Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
    Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
      Deutsche Community     Comunidad en Español    English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
    PepperonI blog 

  • [SOLVED] initramfs takes too long to load

    Using systemd-analyze I found out that initramfs takes too long to load:
    463ms (kernel) + 11875ms (initramfs) + 6014ms (userspace) = 18353ms
    My HOOKS array in mkinitcpio.conf is the following:
    HOOKS="base udev autodetect modconf block encrypt lvm2 filesystems usbinput fsck"
    I suspect that the long loading time of initramfs is caused by partitions decryption (I am using dm-crypt / LUKS on top of LVM).
    Is there any tool that can report loading times of HOOKS seperately, just like systemd-analyze plot does for userspace?
    Last edited by nasosnik (2013-01-21 14:45:28)

    cfr wrote:
    In what sense is it "too long"?
    I'm just wondering: suppose that you find out that it is because you are using encryption. Would you then switch to a non-encrypted system? Would you make better use of the extra seconds you might save on those rare occasions when you reboot? Even if you reboot twice a day, you might save what? Suppose you would even save 5s per boot. That will give you a whole extra 1 minute and 10 seconds a week. Assuming you don't multitask. Obviously if you multitask, the gain will be less. Would that make it worth risking the security of your data?
    EDIT: I didn't mean this to sound as confrontational as it does now I read it back. It just always puzzles me that people are so concerned about shaving a few milliseconds here and there. I always hope that they put the time they save to good use but then I realise that the time they spent shaving the milliseconds off will obviously outstrip the time saved.
    I really don't care about the boot time because of the reasons you have already mentioned. I just want to figure out if there is any misconfiguration. I am just investigating why initramfs takes significant longer to load compared with my desktop Arch installation (non-encrypted) 1316ms for initramfs. My desktop has a Pentium 4 CPU and laptop has a quad-core i7.
    roentgen wrote:11875ms (initramfs)  means the time it takes you to type the password.
    systemd-analyze is not counting the time is spent to type the password.

  • Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

    Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy.  It is a Macbook Pro  osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

    Almost certainly none of the above!  Try each of the following in this order:
    Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
    Close down Safari;  move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
    Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
    Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
              defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

  • Accessing BKPF table takes too long

    Hi,
    Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
    I'm using this:
       select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
       into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
       from bkpf
       where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
       and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
       and blart in so_DocTypes
       and monat in so_monat.
    The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
    Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

    Hi max,
    I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
        select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
         appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
         from bkpf
         where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
         and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
         and blart in so_DocTypes
         and budat in so_budat.
    I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
       while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
         select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
         appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
         from bkpf
         where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
         and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
         and blart in so_DocTypes
         and budat eq so_budat-low.
         so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
       endwhile.
    I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

  • Report Takes Too Long Time

    Hi!
    I am in troubble
    following is the query
    SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
    sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
    pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
    FROM inv_reg i,
    cat_reg c,
    sub_cat_reg s,
    gen_desc_reg g,
    ploc p,
    province r,
    pmaster m,
    iemp_reg e
    WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
    AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
    AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
    AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
    AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
    AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
    AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
    AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
    &wc
    order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
    and this query returns 32000 records
    when i run this query on reports 10g
    then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
    how can i optimize it...?

    Hi Waqas Attari
    Pls study & try this ....
    When your query takes too long ...
    hope it helps....
    Regards,
    Abdetu...

  • OPM process execution process parameters takes too long time to complete

    PROCESS_PARAMETERS are inserted every 15 min. using gme_api_pub packages. some times it takes too long time to complete the batch ,ie completion of request. it takes about 5-6 hrs long time ,in other time s it takes only 15-20 mins.This happens at regular interval...if anybody can guide me I will be thankful to him/her..
    thanks in advance.
    regds,
    Shailesh

    Generally the slowest part of the process is in the extraction itself...
    Check in your source system and see how long the processes are taking, if there are delays, locks or dumps in the database... If your source is R/3 or ECC transactions like SM37, SM21, ST22 can help monitor this activity...
    Consider running less processes in parallel if you have too many and see some delays in jobs... Also indexing some of the tables in the source system to expedite the extraction, make sure there are no heavy processes or interfaces running in the source system at the same time you're trying to load... Check with your Basis guys for activity peaks and plan accordingly...
    In BW also check in your SM21 for database errors or delays...
    Just some ideas...

  • Web application deployment takes too long?

    Hi All,
    We have a wls 10.3.5 clustering environment with one admin server and two managered servers separately. When we try to deploy a sizable web application, it takes about 1 hour to finish. It seems that it takes too long to finish the deployment. Here is the output from one of two managerd server system log. Could anyone tell me it is normal or not? If not, how can I improve this?
    Thanks in advance,
    John
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:03 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535463373> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:05 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <9baa7a67b5727417:26f76f6c:135ca05cff2:-8000-00000000000000b0> <1330535465664> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442300> <BEA-320143> <Scheduled 1 data retirement tasks as per configuration.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive HarvestedDataArchive>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive HarvestedDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive EventsDataArchive>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive EventsDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:23 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <weblogic.cluster.MessageReceiver> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539023098> <BEA-003107> <Lost 2 unicast message(s).>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:36 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539036105> <BEA-000111> <Adding Pinellas1tMS2 with ID -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 to cluster: Pinellas1tCluster1 view.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084375> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
    +####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084507> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
    Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:36 AM
    Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM
    Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:38 AM

    Hi John,
    There may be some circumstances like when there are many files in the WEB-INF folder and JPS don't use TLD.
    I don't think a 1hour deployment is normal, it should be much more faster.
    Since you are using 10.3.5, I suggesto you to install the corresponding patch:
    1. Download patch 10118941p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
    2. Uncompress the file p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
    3. Copy the required files (patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml, CIRF.jar ) to the Patch Download Directory (typically, this folder is <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/cache_dir).
    4. Rename the file patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml into patch-catalog.xml .
    5. Start Smart Update from <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/bsu.sh .
    6. Select "Work Offline" mode.
    7. Go to File->Preferences, and select "Patch Download Directory".
    8. Click "Manage Patches" on the right panel.
    9. You will see the patch in the panel below (Downloaded Patches)
    10. Click "Apply button" of the downloaded patch to apply it to the target installation and follow the instructions on the screen.
    11. Add "-Dweblogic.jsp.ignoreTLDsProcessingInWebApp=true" to the Java options to ignore additional findTLDs cost.
    12. Restart servers.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Cris

  • RPURMP00 program takes too long

    Hi Guys,
    Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
    I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to  Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
    I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
    The long text message is “No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844 “   and     “Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE”
    I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
    It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
          ----Message -
    " Time limit exceeded ".
    "The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
    Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
          ----Source code extract -
    Include RPURMP02
      172 &----                   
      173 *&      Form  get_advice_info                                                               
      174 &----                   
      175 *       text                                                                               
    176 ----                   
      177 *  -->  p1        text                                                                     
      178 *  <--  p2        text                                                                      
      179 ----                   
      180 FORM get_advice_info .                                                                     
      181                                                                               
    182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and                             
      183 * employee detail is maintained                                                             
      184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND                                                    
      185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).                                                       
      186                                                                               
    187 *   get remittance items employee number                                                   
      188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658             
      189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN                                      
    >>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr                                        
      191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn                                        
      192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF                          
      193         EXIT.                                                                               
    194       ENDSELECT.                                                                               
    Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
    Regards.
    CJ

    Hi,
    What is your SAP version?
    Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
    Regards,
    Atish

Maybe you are looking for