Satellite M100: Slow WLan data transfer with 3945ABG Intel Wlan card

Have just popped a brand new M100 with XP upgraded to SP2 onto our network and am having trouble with the Wifi.
Everything works, just really really slowly. Takes about 5 minutes to drag an MP3 off the file-server, web pages download at the speed of a dial-up modem and my beard doubles in length waiting for even a modest flash file to load.
Have tried the following so far...
- Speed is good on the ethernet cable, just not on the wifi.
- Connection speed is good on the wifi (11Mbps) and signal strength is excellent.
- All other laptops on the network are working fast
- I have updated the drivers to the latest provided by intel, no change
- I have applied all service packs and updates to XP (was a brand new box yesterday)
- Disabling various modes on the driver make no difference
- Switching off the QoS mode in the network panel doubled the trickle of data
I see from earlier posts that I'm not the only one who has had this problem with the Intel 3945ABG chips, but I don't see a solution posted. Has anyone had success is solving this kind of problem.
The data throughput is barely usable for internet access and quite inoperable for LAN filesharing or Skype.

Sounds weird. If PCMCIA WLan card gives you good speed it means that there is nothing wrong with your Internet connection, just with built-in wlan card.
You probably should use your warranty services or better yet to return it to the shop and get a new one straight away.
In my country if something brakes within a few days after purchase you don't need to send it to repair under warranty because the shop usually agrees to replace it with new one if they have it in stock.
There is one thing I think you better try: Take it to your friend who has wireless network or to the nearest free hot spot, connect to internet from there and see what speed you get.
It could be, though longshot, that your router has compatibility issues with this specific built-in wlan card.
For example I also have a slight compatibility issue between my d-link router and built-in intel wlan card, but it is about security protocols and not the speed.
Overall it seems to me that this intel wlan card is not that good.

Similar Messages

  • Data transfer with IDoc

    Hi All,
    Can any one please explain me about "Data transfer with IDoc".

    Dear Prasad,
    Using the IDoc option , you will not have a staging in BW like PSA were you can do corrections if required,
    We can use IDOC option when we are very sure that data we are loading is error free,
    and in older versions we are forced to use only IDOC option when doing hierarchy loads and its ruled out now,
    Data transfer with IDoc
    The data is packed into IDocs by the source system and sent to the Business Information Warehouse. In BW your data is saved persistently and intransparently in the IDoc store. From there the IDocs can be updated in the IDocs manually or automatically.
    It is used for hierarchies load Limitations with IDoc is:
    transfer structure must not have more than 1000 Bytes in the character format.
    If it is a critical data we can use IDocs it can't be modified here. In case the load fails we need to load data from source system.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7d/724d3caa70ea6fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Hope this helps u..
    Best Regards,
    VVenkat.
    Edited by: Venkata Narayana Jakkampudi on Dec 23, 2008 12:03 PM

  • Significant slowness in data transfer from source DB to target DB

    Hi DB Wizards,
         My customer is noticing significant slowness in Data copy from the Source DB to the Target DB. The copy process itself is using PL/SQL code along with cursors. The process is to copy across about 7M records from the source DB to the target DB as part of a complicated Data Migration process (this will be a onetime Go-Live process). I have also attached the AWR reports generated during the Data Migration process. Are there any recommendations to help improve the performance of the Data transfer process.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nitin

    multiple COMMIT will take longer to complete the task than a single COMMIT at the end!Lets check how much longer it is:
    create table T1 as
    select OWNER,TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,DATA_TYPE,DATA_TYPE_MOD,DATA_TYPE_OWNER,DATA_LENGTH,DATA_PRECISION,DATA_SCALE,NULLABLE,COLUMN_ID,DEFAULT_LENGTH,NUM_DISTINCT,LOW_VALUE,HIGH_VALUE,DENSITY,NUM_NULLS,NUM_BUCKETS,LAST_ANALYZED,SAMPLE_SIZE,CHARACTER_SET_NAME,CHAR_COL_DECL_LENGTH,GLOBAL_STATS,USER_STATS,AVG_COL_LEN,CHAR_LENGTH,CHAR_USED,V80_FMT_IMAGE,DATA_UPGRADED,HISTOGRAM
    from DBA_TAB_COLUMNS;
    insert /*+APPEND*/ into T1 select *from T1;
    commit;
    -- repeat untill it is >7Mln rows
    select count(*) from T1;
    9233824
    create table T2 as select * from T1;
    set autotrace on timing on;
    truncate table t2;
    declare r number:=0;
    begin
    for t in (select * from t1) loop
    insert into t2 values ( t.OWNER,t.TABLE_NAME,t.COLUMN_NAME,t.DATA_TYPE,t.DATA_TYPE_MOD,t.DATA_TYPE_OWNER,t.DATA_LENGTH,t.DATA_PRECISION,t.DATA_SCALE,t.NULLABLE,t.COLUMN_ID,t.DEFAULT_LENGTH,t.NUM_DISTINCT,t.LOW_VALUE,t.HIGH_VALUE,t.DENSITY,t.NUM_NULLS,t.NUM_BUCKETS,t.LAST_ANALYZED,t.SAMPLE_SIZE,t.CHARACTER_SET_NAME,t.CHAR_COL_DECL_LENGTH,t.GLOBAL_STATS,t.USER_STATS,t.AVG_COL_LEN,t.CHAR_LENGTH,t.CHAR_USED,t.V80_FMT_IMAGE,t.DATA_UPGRADED,t.HISTOGRAM
    r:=r+1;
    if mod(r,10000)=0 then commit; end if;
    end loop;
    commit;
    end;
    --call that couple of times with and without  "if mod(r,10000)=0 then commit; end if;" commented.
    Results:
    One commit
    anonymous block completed
    Elapsed: 00:11:07.683
    Statistics
    18474603 recursive calls
    0 spare statistic 4
    0 ges messages sent
    0 db block gets direct
    0 calls to kcmgrs
    0 PX remote messages recv'd
    0 buffer is pinned count
    1737 buffer is not pinned count
    2 workarea executions - optimal
    0 workarea executions - onepass
    10000 rows commit
    anonymous block completed
    Elapsed: 00:10:54.789
    Statistics
    18475806 recursive calls
    0 spare statistic 4
    0 ges messages sent
    0 db block gets direct
    0 calls to kcmgrs
    0 PX remote messages recv'd
    0 buffer is pinned count
    1033 buffer is not pinned count
    2 workarea executions - optimal
    0 workarea executions - onepass
    one commit
    anonymous block completed
    Elapsed: 00:10:39.139
    Statistics
    18474228 recursive calls
    0 spare statistic 4
    0 ges messages sent
    0 db block gets direct
    0 calls to kcmgrs
    0 PX remote messages recv'd
    0 buffer is pinned count
    1123 buffer is not pinned count
    2 workarea executions - optimal
    0 workarea executions - onepass
    10000 rows commit
    anonymous block completed
    Elapsed: 00:11:46.259
    Statistics
    18475707 recursive calls
    0 spare statistic 4
    0 ges messages sent
    0 db block gets direct
    0 calls to kcmgrs
    0 PX remote messages recv'd
    0 buffer is pinned count
    1000 buffer is not pinned count
    2 workarea executions - optimal
    0 workarea executions - onepass
    What we've got?
    Single commit at the end, avg elapsed: 10:53.4s     
    Commit every 10000 rows (923 times), avg elapsed: 11:20.5s
    Difference:     00:27.1s     3.98%
    Multiple commits is just 4% slower. But it is safer regarding Undo consumed.

  • Data transfer with some errors on registers. (Novice question)

    Hi experts.
    First of all i wat to say that i'm realtively novice in BW.
    I have an ods object.  I have a transformation>Data Transfer Processes>Infopackage to load data to it.
    I execute this with a process chain.
    well the roblem is that some registers I get are erroeous. That's ok, i just want lo load the OK regs, but when this happens the sistem does't load any.
    I want to load only the good registers and be reported about the errors too.
    Can someone please give me some advice about this?? I think thje secret is in the error handling customizing on the DTP, and maybe create a error DTP and something in the infopackage.
    Any tip to me please?
    Thank you!!!

    Hi,
    you need to maintain some parameters in the update tab of  the dtp.
    a) set the error handling to update valid records, reporting possible (request green)
    b) enhance the no. of error records to the size of the data packet.
    c) create a error dtp
    Now all records without error will be updated, the request will be green and so available for reporting. The records with errors will go to the error stack and can be edited there. The records of the error stack will be updated thru a error dtp.
    regards
    Siggi

  • Verizon Westell 327 Moden not capatible with new Intel AirPort card

    After spending a lot of time with Verizon and Apple on the phone Verizon states that their modem/wireless is not compatible with the new Intels for a wireless connection. Apparently they have had a lot of phone calls and know what the problem is (software problem). So I've given up and was wondering if I purchased either the Airport Express or Airport Extreme and hard wired it up to my worthless Westell modem whether I could connect wirelessly that way.
    iMac 20" Intel   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    Welcome to Discussions, Michelle!
    Check the bottom of the Westell for the model number to see if it needs a firmware update (it might not need one).
    From what I can see, IF your Westell is one of the models that needs a firmware update, rather than trying to find a Mac version of the update, it would be quickest to use a windows computer to download the update and install it to the Westell. Firmware is an alteration to hardware only, and there is no interaction with software. None of the firmware update belongs on the iMac, nor on a windows computer either - after the installation to the Westell is completed the installer can be deleted from the computer.
    You already know how to get the update from Dell, and it's also available from Verizon, and from Bell South as near as I can tell.
    You could always demand from Verizon that they mail you a Mac-compatible firmware upgrade for the Westell (again, if it needs it) on a CD, but that might take longer than it's worth. Perhaps you could even demand a replacement wireless router that's up-to-date for Intel-based Macs.
    From what I can see searching around just a bit about the issue, it appears that there can be several different issues involved in setting up the Westell with an Intel-based Mac. At least if you can determine whether yours is one that needs the firmware update or not, then you'll be that much closer to getting the iMac to work with it.

  • [Satellite Pro A200] - slowness during data transfer and heat problems.

    Hi folks.
    I have a 1.5 y.o Toshiba Satellite Pro A200 with standard 200GB HDD. Since some time its behaviour is just... weird.
    Sometimes system slows. It just behaves sluggish, it frequently freezes for a second during simple tasks such as entering the text. It;s more frequent during intensive data transfers (such as copying files through FTP from my LAN or copying from pendrive) but sometimes it happens even when no other app than the Firefox is working. It's not that apparent, so I wonder - will service take it under warranty conditions (which means - is there a probability that they'll say that everything is perfect and charge me for this?)
    The computer was on the warranty repair once, they replaced HDD with other one. Is it possible that the other one has some troubles as well (S.M.A.R.T. check discovers nothing). Or maybe it's faulty SATA controller?
    Other thing is the temperature. During normal work (Internet, MS Word) both cores works at 60*C. When gaming the temperature can rise above 90*C and the computer sometimes shuts down. I assume that the problem is the dust accumulated inside the laptop but I can't see how can I clean it up.
    Would you go to the service with such problems?

    Virus scanners can slow a system down considerably, what Virus Scanner are you using?
    If you have many programs installed, maybe its time to backup your data and reinstall Windows. I do it myself every year since Windows tends to get bloated and slow after a while.
    As for the dust, you can blow it out using a Can of compressed Air sprayed through the main air vent (while the system is off).
    Or if the dust buildup is really bad, you may need to send it to an Authorised Service Provider to get it dismantled and cleaned up.

  • Low data transfer with memory stick on a Satellite A100-207

    Hi, whenever I stick the memory stick from my Sony Ericsson P990i Smartphone into my notebook it says it has detected new hardware and needs to reboot to use it.
    I kinda expected this first time, but it does it EVERY TIME now. Which means transfering files onto the memory stick takes a lot longer than it should and it is far easier (but a lot less convient) to transfer them via my network to my main home PC and use the card reader in my Epson printer to put the files on the memory stick.
    Anyone know why this happens and how to stop it. I need to regularly update files on the memory stick as they are edited both on the laptop and the phone (via QucikOffice which comes pre-installed and alows editing of word and excel files).
    Any help or ideas is appreicated.
    Andy

    I agree with Andrej. You should be 100% sure that this card is compatible with the card reader on the notebook.
    Furthermore what transfer rate do you expect?
    I think every card has different write/read access times. So do not compare it with other cards.

  • Slow data transfer with Time Capsule on 802.11n ?

    Hi,
    Actually, I don't know where to start. But let's explain my setup first:
    My iMac (wired) and AppleTV (wireless) are connected to the Time Capsule (802.11n, 5Ghz)
    My girlfriend's MacBook and 2 x iPhone 2G's (wireless) are connected to an Airport Extreme Base station (802.11b/g compatible).
    The Time Capsule and AEBS are connected and show two different networks.
    Now the problem:
    When I copy files from e.g. the iMac to the MacBook or to the Apple TV, it's very slow. I've used scp to copy a 200 mb file and it took about 1.20 minutes (at 2.5MB/s). I've did the same when the iMac was connected over wireless and it took about 3.45 to 4.30 minutes (at 1.0MB/s).
    I'm not sure if this IS slow, but it certainly feels like it. 802.11n should be around 100 Mb/s in practice and 802.11b/g around 20-25 Mb/s.
    By the way: downloading from the Internet is excellent, I get the full download/upload speed my provider offers for my subscription.
    Second, I added the signal strength/noise levels for the Time Capsule attached devices. They vary around -68Db signal, -90Db noise.
    The question is: are these levels normal ? What should be higher or lower ?
    Thanks in advance !
    Rutger

    The new Airport Extremes and Time Capsules suffers from terrible performance over the 5GHz band and it's a problem that not only affects me and you, but hundreds of thousands of other owners.
    Nobody knows if it's a firmware problem or the Marvell chips inside that's the problem, and Apple hasn't said or done anything for months.
    I'm still hoping for a firmware update to solve this, but if it doesn't get fixed soon enough, I'm gonna return it and go back to backing up to wired disk and my rock solid Airport Express.
    Not the happiest answer, but at least you have a clue now.
    Cheers,
    Koski

  • Data Transfer with Socket

    Hi,
    we want to transfer some arrays using socket.
    On the server side we send two array (arrays of byte of ~50 Kbytes) with:
    PrintStream out = new PrintStream(client.getOutputStream(), true)
    out.write(Array of byte).
    On the client side we do not receive two stream of data of 50Kbyte, but we receive two or more stream of different size using:
    BufferedInputStream in = new BufferedInputStream(s.getInputStream()) in.read(Msg).
    Server side:
    Send Array1;
    Send Array2;
    Client Side:
    get Stream1;
    get Stream2;
    get Stream3;
    Stream1 = part of Array1
    Stream2 = remaining of Array1 and part of Array 2
    Stream3 = remaining of Array2
    Is it possible to receive each array in one stream each and not fragmented in different stream ??
    What we wanna is:
    Server side:
    Send Array1;
    Send Array2;
    Client side:
    get Stream1 (= Array1)
    get Stream2 (= Array2)
    Best Regs

    I didn't quite understand your post, given your mix of Java code and pseudocode.
    However, I shall attempt to give you some guidance:
    When you say you are using multiple streams, I am assuming that you are only using 1 stream, but reading in from it multiple times.
    With a network connection, delivery over the stream of all the content at one time cannot be guranteed. In practical terms this means that you cannot do the following:
    Server:
    send 50kb of data
    Client:
    receive 50kb of data.
    Close connection.
    What you have to do instead is:
    Server:
    send 50kb of data
    Client:
    read from stream until 50kb of data have been read.
    Close connection.
    For the above to work, you must know that you are expecting 50kb of data. If you don't know how big the data stream is going to be, there are two solutions:
    Solution 1: include length of data in send:
    Server:
    send 2 bytes representing the length of the data (in this case 12bk)
    send 12kb of data
    Client:
    read length of stream (2 bytes. Should give you 12kb).
    read 12kb of data.
    Close connection.
    Solution 2: include batch separators:
    This solution is when you want to send a number of batches down the same line (kindda what you want).
    Server:
    send 50kb of data
    send separator (e.g. '|''|')
    send 34kb of data
    Client:
    read stream until stream is closed, or separator encountered.
    if separator encountered, create new data batch, continue as above.
    The problem with solution 2, is that you now have to devise an appropriate way for escaping the separator. If the separator occurs naturally in the data you are sending, you should escape it on sending, and unescape it on reading in at the other end.
    However, after all of the explanation above, my advise to you is: use the ObjectOutputStream and the ObjectInputStream classes. With these, you should be able to send and receive the array with no problems. Follow the advice in the JavaDocs and possibly the Java Tutorial for more info on using the ObjectStreams.
    Regards,
    Manuel Amago.

  • External data transfer with KEFC.

    Hi,
    We are trying to make an upload of a cvs file with tcode KEFC with SAP ECC 6.0.
    We have defined the structure and the transfer rules (KEFA and KEFB).
    The same file has been used with SAP 4.6 with the same structure and transfer rules.
    The upload has been made correctly on 4.6 while for ECC 6.0 we have a problem.
    The screen after the upload gives a list with the data read from the csv file, and for some field the value is missing (GJAHR, PERBL and MENGE).
    Opening the log generated, an empy list of the errors is shown (the light is red but all the record are blank).
    I don't know if the problem is related to the file, but uploading the same file in 4.6, the transfer data is correct.
    We have created the same structure for the two environments with the same field and the same lenght:
    (KEFA)
    Sender field 4.6     Type 4.6     Lenght 4.6     Sender field 6.0     Type 6.0     Lenght 6.0
    BUKRS                       CHAR        4     BUKRS                     CHAR     4
    WERKS                       CHAR        4     WERKS                     CHAR     4
    ARTNR                       CHAR       18     ARTNR                     CHAR     18
    KOKRS                       CHAR           4     KOKRS                     CHAR     4
    GJAHR                       NUMC        4     GJAHR                     NUMC     4
    PERBL                       NUMC        7     PERBL                     NUMC     7
    ABSMG_ME       UNIT        3     ABSMG_ME     UNIT     3
    MENGE                       NUMC       12     MENGE                     NUMC     12
    VRGAR                       CHAR       1     VRGAR                     CHAR     1
    VERSI                       CHAR       3     VERSI                     CHAR     3
    VKORG                       CHAR       4     VKORG                     CHAR     4
    KNDNR                       CHAR       10     KNDNR                     CHAR     10
    VTWEG                       CHAR       2     VTWEG                     CHAR     2
    KTGRD                       CHAR       2     KTGRD                     CHAR     2
    PLTYP                       CHAR       2     PLTYP                     CHAR     2
    but we have identified a difference during the setting of the transfer rule (KEFB): in the 4.6 the sender field have a different lenght from the same ones in the ECC 6.0.
    We have tried to re-create a new structure, but the sender field lenght remain the same.
    Do you know which is the problem? Could be possible that the cause is this difference between the field lenght? If yes, how we can solve this problem?
    Thanks a lot for your collaboration,
    Regards,
    Jody Mancini.

    Hi Sandhya,
    checking in the KEFD tcode, all the transfer rule between sender fields and receiving fields are correct.
    Following you can find the rules:
    Rec. field      Description         Lenght      Sender field      Formula
    ABSMG       Sales quantity          8            ---                 MENGE
    ARTNR         Product                  36          ARTNR             ---
    BUKRS        Company Code        8           BUKRS             ---
    GJAHR         Fiscal year              8           GJAHR             ---
    KNDNR        Customer                20          KNDNR             ---
    KOKRS        CO area                  8           KOKRS             ---
    KTGRD         AcctAssgGr            4           KTGRD              ---
    PERIO          Period/year            14          PERBL              ---
    VKORG        Sales org.               8          VKORG              ---
    VRGAR         Record type            2          VRGAR              ---
    VTWEG        Distr. channel          4          VTWEG              ---
    WERKS        Plant                      8          WERKS              ---
    WWPLT        Price list type          4          PLTYP               ---
    The field MENGE is the Sales quantity of the input file and PERBL is concatenate of the period and year.
    The rules seems to be correct.
    The difference I wrote yesterday is relates to the lenght of the receiving field.
    In the ECC 6.0 all fields (excepting ABSMG) have a double lenght of 4.6:
    Field     Lenght 6.0     Lenght 4.6
    ABSMG     8     8
    ARTNR     36     18
    BUKRS     8     4
    GJAHR     8     4
    KNDNR     20     10
    KOKRS     8     4
    KTGRD     4     2
    PERIO     14     7
    VKORG     8     4
    VRGAR     2     1
    VTWEG     4     2
    WERKS     8     4
    WWPLT     4     2
    The problem could be this different lenght? If so, where I can modify the lenght of the receiving fields?
    Thanks again,
    Regards,
    Jody Mancini.

  • Very slow Firewire data transfer when connected to ext. HDD

    Hi, I have both a Mini and a Mac book. When I connect my Macbook upto a WD MyBook Premium ext HDD and use SuperDuper! to back it up, I get an average copy speed of about 20 m/s. On my Mini I get about 2m/s!
    Both the machines are more or less the latest version, that is less than 3 months old.
    Any ideas why the Mini is sooooo slow?

    Here are the ideas I can come up with ...
    Be sure your Mini is configured to not run spotlight indexing on the external drive.
    What model Mini do you have and how much RAM?
    Are these incremental backups, or clones?
    The last time I cloned my mini's hard drive with superduper over firewire, if I recall correctly I was getting speeds of about 10-12.
    Another factor may be how full the source internal drives are: a Mac with a very full hard drive will be slower.
    And I'm assuming you have multiple partitions on the external. The first partition probably has a slight speed advantage over the other partitions because of less head seeking movement.

  • New router fixed my slow my data transfer speeds

    I've been living with a relatively slow internet connection for over a year without knowing it. When I moved here I had FiOS 50/50 installed. I didn't realize a big boost in speed compared to what I had before. But up until a month ago, I had been a light user. Only occasionally connecting a tablet or phone through Wi-Fi. I got a new computer lately and started transferring files via FiOS from a very fast and reliable remote server. I knew right away something was wrong.
    To make a long story short the problem turned out to be the wireless router. At the time of installation, the router was actually an old model. I had no way of knowing this because the Verizon "My Services" page said I had a more capable piece of equipment. Besides being dated hardware, it evidentially wasn't working as well as it should have. Here, we willl fast forward through the processes of rectifing the issue to receiving the new router.
    I am happy to report that considering the variables, I am getting the speeds I was expecting. To confirm this the speed and diagnosic reports are awsome. Doubled the download speed of the old router connected by wire from <25 to >50. Better than 7X the speed connected by Wi-Fi from <7 to >50.
    It took considerable effort to resolve but it was worth finding out if these incredible speeds are achievable. And, they are.
    Thanks for reading.

    So what router did you get? Was it the Fios Quantum Gateway?

  • Poor data transfer with 3G on iPad2?

    I have an iPad 2 with 3G, and in recent months the 3G reception has deteriorated to being pretty much useless.  On speedtests my rates are very low.  I get 1 or 2 bars most of the time.  When I have my IPhone 4 right next to it, the reception is 4-5 bars on 3G and 3-4 mbps download rates. What gives?  I am going to get an IPad4th gen so i can get better cell service but if there will be outrageous charges on verizon for LTE4G perhaps I need ATT. But why such the difference between iPhone 4 and Pad 2?

        Hi Suzie T!
    I would be asking the same questions if I were you! Let's see what we can do to figure this out for you! The best way to determine if an issue is equipment-related or network-related is if the two devices are right next to each other. Since your iPhone is getting a better signal, the indication would be that it's equipment related and some troubleshooting is needed. I would recomment a soft reset of the iPad 2 to see if that resolves the issue. Please hold down the power key and the home key simultaneously until the Apple logo appears. Then, power back on and post back with the results.
    Thanks,
    Christina B
    VZW Support
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • ME 11 data transfer : with category as consignment

    Hi experts,
    I am using batch input method and using standard program
    in lsmw.
    After completing all the steps when i am running batch input session in foreground it is automatcially choosing the standard radio button of transaction me11, I need to choose the consignment radio button.
    The field esokz which is present in me11, whoose value if 2 means consignment is not present in structured proposed by SAP IN THE STEP " MAINTAIN STRUCTURE RELATION" hence going further when the fields are mapped the field is not present .
    could u please suggets an approach to make lsmw run me11 with option consignment.

    Hi,
    PLease use LSMW recording method.
    I think it may work perfectly.

  • FTP Data Transfer with SAPFTPA

    Hello,
    I would like to use the ftp-command "! ls -l".
    As I use the " ! " in ftp, the command should be executed on the local pc/application server (not on the remote server).
    When I use the rfc_destination SAPFTP the command runs perfect and I get as result (from FTP_COMMAND) all files listed.
    But when I use the rfc_destination SAPFTPA I don't get the files listed.
    Also no error
    Any ideas, how can get the result from an " ! " command???
    Much thx in advance
    Christian

    I decided to use the SM69 command.
    So I use a direct OS command instead of the remote "local" command.

Maybe you are looking for