Satellite T130-10T: High CPU usage for non apparent reason

I have a brand new Satelitte T130.
From unboxing, I remarked that CPU usage is most of the time very high, even when doing nothing (no applications are running).
It sometimes hits 100% and stays ther for a few minutes.
I installed the newest BIOST I could find on the Toshiba site, but nothing changes.
Any ideas?
I don't like this just-out-the-box-unit already causes troubles!

Hi mate
There are a lot of applications which are running in the background.
Most of them are installed by Toshiba and such tools controls the notebook features like FN buttons, multi control buttons, eco button, etc
You can see the ruing applications in task manager. There you can also see what background process needs the CPU usage.
Greets

Similar Messages

I notice that Foxfire 4 sometimes shows 50 to 60% CPU usage for no apparent reason. If I reboot, its back to normal for a few hours. Then the same problem recurrs and I have to reboot again. I have just upgraded to 4.0.1. Don't know if it helps

At the same time, I often see ccsvchst.exe using 30 to 50% CPU to really slow everything down. I checked this with Norton; and they uninstall/reinstalled Norton - three times. I still see this program with excessive CPU usage sometimes. If I reboot, sometimes it helps. Other times, not.

When you have kernel panics, the pertinent information is in the panic report.
These instructions must be carried out as an administrator. If you have only one user account, you are the administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad and start typing the name.
In the Console window, select
DIAGNOSTIC AND USAGE INFORMATION ▹ System Diagnostic Reports
(not Diagnostic and Usage Messages) from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
There is a disclosure triangle to the left of the list item. If the triangle is pointing to the right, click it so that it points down. You'll see a list of reports. A panic report has a name that begins with "Kernel" and ends in ".panic". Select the most recent one. The contents of the report will appear on the right. Use copy and paste to post the entire contents—the text, not a screenshot.
If you don't see any reports listed, but you know there was a panic, you may have chosen Diagnostic and Usage Messages from the log list. Choose DIAGNOSTIC AND USAGE INFORMATION instead.
In the interest of privacy, I suggest that, before posting, you edit out the “Anonymous UUID,” a long string of letters, numbers, and dashes in the header of the report, if it’s present (it may not be.)
Please don’t post other kinds of diagnostic report.
I know the report is long, maybe several hundred lines. Please post all of it anyway.

Satellite X300 PQX31A - Blue screen appears for non apparent reason

Hi,
I have had my Qosmio X300 for 2 months with no problems till now. I got some random blue screens so checked the driver site and found the Bios update 1.60.
I installed this now the blue screen thing is happening every time I push the machine hard. It does not seem to be getting hot but when I tried the ntune utility to find temps this made it blue screen every time.
I am starting to get a little lost how to diagnose this.
I cannot find the 1.50 bios to downgrade to.
The blue screens are IRQL, Page Fault ect. Seems to be in Adobe CS4, Matlab and ntune i.e. anything which tried to access the mainboard or pushes hard.
I have not installed before the first series of crashes.
Any further thoughts?
Cheers,
Lost

Hi,
The bios is now 1.60 from 1.50 wich did not resolve the issue. There are no new display dirvers for this model. Sorry I can not remember the BSOD codes and currently dont have the laptop as I have sent it back to Toshiba. I suspect bad memory.
Cheers,

High CPU usage for webservd

we are seeing a very high CPU usage for webservd. looking at the java stack it seems to be threads communicating to sun one LDAP server.
Anyone experienced this? is there a know issue in Java LDAP SDK?
Sun ONE Web Server 6.1SP4 B12/16/2004
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu0 10 0 59:30:33 8.8% webservd/6235
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu16 10 0 223:58:38 8.7% webservd/5043
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu17 10 0 545:54:49 8.7% webservd/2902
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 10 0 379:07:26 8.3% webservd/3996
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu1 30 0 213:54:52 8.3% webservd/5115
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 56:03:44 8.2% webservd/6265
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu18 30 0 556:18:29 8.2% webservd/2830
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu3 30 0 548:09:11 8.2% webservd/2890
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 328:18:42 8.1% webservd/4359
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu2 30 0 5:11:16 8.1% webservd/6722
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 181:49:48 8.1% webservd/5322
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 251:44:35 7.8% webservd/4857
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: "BlockedThread" daemon prio=1
0 tid=0x01110650 nid=0xb56 runnable [0x1714f000..0x1714fc10]
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at netscape.ldap.LDAPSe
archListener.nextMessage(LDAPSearchListener.java:86)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at netscape.ldap.LDAPSe
archListener.getResponse(LDAPSearchListener.java:77)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at com.iplanet.services
.ldap.event.BlockedThread.run(BlockedThread.java:121)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at java.lang.Thread.run
(Thread.java:595)

forgot to mention: OS is solaris 9

High cpu usage for garbage collection (uptime vs total gc time)

Hi Team,
We have a very high cpu usage issue in the production.
When we restart the server, the cpu idle time would be around 95% and it comes down as days goes by. Today idle cpu is 30% and it is just 6th day after the server restart.
Environemnt details:
Jrockit version:
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_05-b04)
BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_05 JVM R24.4.0-1 (build ari-38120-20041118-1131-linux-ia32, Native Threads, GC strategy: parallel)
Gc Algorithm: JRockit Garbage Collection System currently running strategy: Single generational, parallel mark, parallel sweep
Number Of Processors: 4
Max Heap Size: 1073741824
Total Garbage Collection Time: 21:43:56.5
Uptime: 114:33:4.1
Total Garbage Collection Count: 420872
Total Number Of Threads: 198
Number Of Daemon Threads: 191
Can you guys please tell me what would be problem in the server which causing the high cpu usage?
One more thing I would like to know is that why the total number of threads is 198 when we specified the Executor pool size as 25? I agree that weblogic would create some threads for its maintenance but around 160 threads!!! something is wrong I guess.
Santhosh.
[email protected]

Hi,
I'm having a similar problem, but haven't been able to resolve it yet. Troubleshooting is made even harder by the fact that this is only happening on our production server, and I've been unable to reproduce it in the lab.
I'll post whatever findings I have and hopefully we'll be able to find a solution with the help of BEA engineers.
In my case, I have a stand-alone Tomcat server that runs fine for about 1-2 days, and then the JVM suddenly starts using more CPU, and as a result, the server load shoots up (normal CPU utilization is ~5% but eventually goes up to ~95%; load goes from 0.1 to 4+).
What I have found so far is that this corresponds to increased GC activity.
Let me list my environment specs before I proceed, though:
CPU: Dual Xeon 3.06GHz
RAM: 2GB
OS: RHEL4.4 (2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp)
JVM build 1.5.0_03-b07 (BEA JRockit(R) (build dra-45238-20050523-2008-linux-ia32, R25.2.0-28))
Tomcat version 5.5.12
JAVA_OPTS="-Xms768m -Xmx768m -XXtlasize16k -XXlargeobjectlimit16k -Xverbose:memory,cpuinfo -Xverboselog:/var/log/tomcat5/jvm.log -Xverbosetimestamp"
Here are excerpts from my verbose log (I'm getting some HT warning, not sure if that's a problem):
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Detected SMP with 2 CPUs that support HT.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to determine if HT is enabled.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to read from /dev/cpu/0/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: Failed to read from /dev/cpu/0/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to read from /dev/cpu/1/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: Failed to read from /dev/cpu/1/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] HT is: supported by the CPU, not enabled by the OS, enabled in JRockit.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: HT enabled even though OS does not seem to support it.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:55 2006][22855][memory ] GC strategy: System optimized over throughput (initial strategy singleparpar)
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:55 2006][22855][memory ] heap size: 786432K, maximal heap size: 786432K
[Fri Oct 20 16:07:30 2006][22855][memory ] Changing GC strategy to generational, parallel mark and parallel sweep
[Fri Oct 20 16:07:30 2006][22855][memory ] 791.642-791.874: GC 786432K->266892K (786432K), 232.000 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:08:02 2006][22855][memory ] 824.122: nursery GC 291998K->274164K (786432K), 175.873 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:09:51 2006][22855][memory ] 932.526: nursery GC 299321K->281775K (786432K), 110.879 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:10:24 2006][22855][memory ] 965.844: nursery GC 308151K->292222K (786432K), 174.609 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:11:54 2006][22855][memory ] 1056.368: nursery GC 314718K->300068K (786432K), 66.032 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:21:09 2006][22855][memory ] 113210.427: nursery GC 734274K->676137K (786432K), 188.985 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:30:41 2006][22855][memory ] 113783.140: nursery GC 766601K->708592K (786432K), 96.007 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:36:15 2006][22855][memory ] 114116.332-114116.576: GC 756832K->86835K (786432K), 243.333 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:48:20 2006][22855][memory ] 114841.653: nursery GC 182299K->122396K (786432K), 175.252 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:48:52 2006][22855][memory ] 114873.851: nursery GC 195060K->130483K (786432K), 142.122 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:01:31 2006][22855][memory ] 115632.706: nursery GC 224096K->166618K (786432K), 327.264 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:16:37 2006][22855][memory ] 116539.368: nursery GC 246564K->186328K (786432K), 173.888 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:26:21 2006][22855][memory ] 117122.577: nursery GC 279056K->221543K (786432K), 170.367 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:26:21 2006][22855][memory ] 117123.041: nursery GC 290439K->225833K (786432K), 69.170 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:29:10 2006][22855][memory ] 117291.795: nursery GC 298947K->238083K (786432K), 207.200 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:39:05 2006][22855][memory ] 117886.478: nursery GC 326956K->263441K (786432K), 87.009 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:55:22 2006][22855][memory ] 118863.947: nursery GC 357229K->298971K (786432K), 246.643 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:08:17 2006][22855][memory ] 119638.750: nursery GC 381744K->322332K (786432K), 147.996 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:11:22 2006][22855][memory ] 119824.249: nursery GC 398678K->336478K (786432K), 93.046 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:35 2006][22855][memory ] 120436.740: nursery GC 409150K->345186K (786432K), 81.304 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:38 2006][22855][memory ] 120439.582: nursery GC 409986K->345832K (786432K), 153.534 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:42 2006][22855][memory ] 120443.544: nursery GC 410632K->346473K (786432K), 121.371 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:44 2006][22855][memory ] 120445.508: nursery GC 411273K->347591K (786432K), 60.688 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:44 2006][22855][memory ] 120445.623: nursery GC 412391K->347785K (786432K), 68.935 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:45 2006][22855][memory ] 120446.576: nursery GC 412585K->348897K (786432K), 152.333 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:45 2006][22855][memory ] 120446.783: nursery GC 413697K->349080K (786432K), 70.456 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:34:16 2006][22855][memory ] 121197.612: nursery GC 437378K->383392K (786432K), 165.771 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:37:37 2006][22855][memory ] 121398.496: nursery GC 469709K->409076K (786432K), 78.257 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:37:37 2006][22855][memory ] 121398.730: nursery GC 502490K->437713K (786432K), 65.747 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:44:03 2006][22855][memory ] 121785.259: nursery GC 536605K->478156K (786432K), 132.293 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:44:04 2006][22855][memory ] 121785.603: nursery GC 568408K->503635K (786432K), 71.751 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:50:39 2006][22855][memory ] 122180.985: nursery GC 591332K->530811K (786432K), 131.831 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:13:52 2006][22855][memory ] 123573.719: nursery GC 655566K->595257K (786432K), 117.311 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:36:04 2006][22855][memory ] 124905.507: nursery GC 688896K->632129K (786432K), 346.990 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:24 2006][22855][memory ] 125765.715-125765.904: GC 786032K->143954K (786432K), 189.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:26 2006][22855][memory ] 125767.535-125767.761: GC 723232K->70948K (786432K), 225.000 ms
vvvvv
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:27 2006][22855][memory ] 125768.751-125768.817: GC 712032K->71390K (786432K), 64.919 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:28 2006][22855][memory ] 125769.516-125769.698: GC 711632K->61175K (786432K), 182.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:29 2006][22855][memory ] 125770.753-125770.880: GC 709632K->81558K (786432K), 126.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:30 2006][22855][memory ] 125771.699-125771.878: GC 708432K->61368K (786432K), 179.000 ms
So, I'm running with the default GC strategy which lets the GC pick the most suitable approach (single space or generational). It seems to switch to generational almost immediately and runs well - most GC runs are in the nursery, and only once in a while it goes through the older space.
Now, if you look at [Sun Oct 22 02:50:27 2006], that's when everything changes. GC starts running every second (later on it's running 3 times a second) doing huge sweeps. It never goes through the nursery again, although the strategy is still generational.
It's all downhill from this point on, and it's a matter of hours (maybe a day) before we restart the server.
I guess my only question is: What would cause such GC behavior?
I would appreciate your ideas/comments!
Thanks,
Tenyo

High CPU usage for SERVER0 process in XI

Hi,
SERVER0 process is taking high CPU usage, previously it happen once its due to communication channel error, So we deativated some unwanted communication channels in Alert config and the CPU usage is reduced.
After some weeks its again CPU usage is increasing for SERVER0 process in some time.
Can anyone help in this case.
Thank you,
gopi.

Hi Gopi,
Check out Tim's reply and check for ur Java stack settings,
Extended Memory parameters
<i>The bottom line for J stacks is to keep everything in memory and out of swap. </i>
Other tips:
- u may try clearing folder usr\sap\<SID>\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\server0\apps
- try increasing virtual memory
- increase heap size
<i>[Reward if helpful]</i>
Regards,
Prateek

HIGH CPU Usage for No Reason! HELPP

ok on my 13inch White Macbook my cpu system usage is VERY high for no apparent reason. My activity monitor shows nothing going on but safari (which is really my only use on the computer) . so does ANYONE have any idea what could cause my system usage to be so high .???? its causing my safari to run slow at times, and its makes my fan run alot bc i think my computer is working so hard.

i changed it to "All Processes" and what i see is it switches out from Safari being the highest at like 3 something, then Activity monitor around the same, then Window Server around the same as well. But my System Usage down at the bottom is still 50+ and User Usage is about 5.

Satellite L755D - sound keeps cutting out for no apparent reason

I posted this in another thread, but thought I might need to start one of my own since a solution had been found by that person and I am still having a problem. So, about three weeks ago the sound on my computer began just cutting out for no apparent reason. It happened while I was watching streaming video and I tried updating all my software stuff (like flash and java and things of that nature). It still continued to happen and now it was happening with streaming video, with youtube type videos, and with mp3s stored on this computer. I discovered that if I went to the control panel and clicked on sound/hardware and then clicked on the tab for recording, the sound immediately came back. So, I've been doing this for the past couple of weeks and it is extremely annoying! In another thread on ths forum, the individual discovered that the Malwarebytes program had been the culprit and I was happy to have an answer, except that I had installed security software last week which removed MB from my computer. And I continue to have the issue even today. I clicked on the link in the other thread to update my drivers and I continue to have the issue. Can anyone help? It's making me crazy! Thanks in advance.

OK - I'm getting this as well. Satellite L750-1E5. It was fine for ages and this started happening about a month ago now. - tried updating the drivers - System restored back to when it worked, not working This led me to think it was a hardware problem. My gut feeling however was that it was some sort of driver problem as sound would cutout after about 2 minutes, but would often come back if I started playing another song or something. Reinstalled Windows 7(64 bit) and played through an entire song with no issues(using Windows 7 sound drivers). Ran Windows update and the issue has come back. Installed the proper Conexant driver, but issue still occurring. I believe a Windows update has caused this issue.

Re: Satellite Pro M70 - High CPU Usage - Low Performance

I sincerely hope someone can help. I do not consider myself really computer illiterate, but this is where my understanding ends and I would truly value all help offered.
I have a Toshiba Satellite Pro M70 of 2 yrs old and I am a definite advocate for Toshiba. However, my operating system is slow. Average day usage with Internet Explorer and Office 2007 is a painstaking process that takes too long. I have had conflicts with Trend Micro Internet Security 2008, which works perfectly.
But starting up the computer takes ages. CPU usage is usually high and System Idle Processes as well. I have reinstalled Windows XP from the Toshiba Boot DVD already 4 times with starting fresh and installing everything time and time again. Each time after getting everything up to speed again, the performance is disappointing.
I have extended RAM to 1,49 GB which made little difference from the original 1/3 of RAM. It seems that something is slowing down the computer, but this is not visable in the processes; other than quite a few svhost.exe processes that take little processing capacity nor CPU usage.
I have used Windows Gold Certified Uniblue Power Suite with a good registry cleaner. This helps a bit, but after a couple of days it seems to get only worse. I have an Intel Pentium M 1.73 GHz processor. Research online reveals that Trend Micro IS 2008 is quite good and demanding little capacity in comparison to competing security packages.
Is this system/software related or could this be a hardware issue?
Thanks in advance to all!

Hi!
This definitively not a hardware issue and I think should try to optimize some Windows settings to make your notebook faster.
At first you should clean the start up folder. Remove all programs that you dont need at start up. For example I dont have programs in the start up folder.
Furthermore you can customize the start up programs in msconfig (start => run => msconfig). There you can disable more programs that you dont need. Its your choice what do disable or enable.
You can improve the performance if you defragment your HDD from time time.
Remove all programs and trial software that you dont need and after this clean the registry. You can use CCleaner as Jimi said.
Try an other antivirus program. Maybe TrendMicro is not full compatible to the software that you use. I use AntiVir.
Bye

High CPU usage for tcc.exe on Windows XP

We have the following setup which hosts a JAVA client application:
A Netra T12 which is used as a GUI server + SGD server.
A 490 acting as another GUI server.
Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP SP1 for the SGD client sessions.
When we run clients via this setup, we run into an issue where tcc suddenly starts eating up 50 - 99% cpu causing the clients to slow down.
Has anyone else experienced this issue? I can share configuration info but any help would be appreciated.

High CPU utilization is mostly due to queries or the background activity performed by Oracle.
Submit your statsapck report to www.statspackanalyzer.com and get the report in understandable format. Then you know where to look into.

High CPU usage for simple tasks?

Hello,
In iTunes, various tasks take 3-4 seconds to happen/start (rating a song, scrolling up and down within a list of songs, etc.), and I get either rainbow wheel or lag/nothing happening (or both) in the meantime. I did not notice this problem before the new (11) version of iTunes, and no other apps/programs are having issues of any kind. I checked CPU usage while changing the rating of a song and it went to about 55% for 5 seconds or so. That can't be right... it just can't. Is this some kind of bug in iTunes or is there something (simple!) I can do to fix it?
I'm pretty sure I have Genius turned off, but I've never used it so I really don't even know much about it.
iMac 24" w/3.06 GHz processor, 4GB memory, the computer's about 4 or 5 years old but still runs very well everywhere else. Currently running 10.6.8 and my external backup died on me a few months ago, so updating the OS, if there's ANY chance of losing anything, isn't an option right now.
I use iTunes a lot so this is driving me insane. Please help!
Message was edited by: earthimmigrant (clarifying the issue a bit better)

forgot to mention: OS is solaris 9

High CPU usage for no reason

Recently, my MBP becomes hot and its battery life becomes shorter, so I checked the Activity Monitor. The CPU is reported as ~37% User and ~22% System when it's idle. But I am not running anything besides Activity Monitor and all processes show normal CPU usage in Activity Monitor.
I also heard the harddisk keeping reading/writing. The Disk Activity persistently reported 0 Reads in/sec and ~30 Writes out/sec when the computer is idle.
I have repaired permissions, and reset the PRAM, but nothing changed.
Any help would be appreciated!

Workaround and Solution!
In a nutshell: The long and short of it is that many websites today are very resource intensive. The workaround is to share the load among two to four different browsers. This workaround works every time. The browser-builders will have to make the final fixes.
I urge all of you to duplicate my results!
I've been troubleshooting this with Apple for well over 2 weeks and just discovered the root cause and workaround a couple of hours ago. Here's what I sent to Apple:
Subject:
Root Cause Identified for Case 20244XXXX!
Body:
Insufficient Stress Testing and No Load Shedding!
Hello Annette, Jim and Steve,
Please see the attached screenshots.
Engineering, especially test engineering, needs to look at this! When this is resolved Steve can go on stage and show another Safari feature that is superior to Camino, Chrome and Firefox, etc. (I was able to replicate part of this using several boxes at a local Apple Store about a week ago!)
Here’s the deal:
I was blaming Safari because I rarely use other browsers.
1. Open Activity Monitor to All Processes and order by %CPU descending.
2. Launch a browser and go to http://streamingradioguide.com/streaming-radio.php?format=1&radio-format=News/Ta lk&includeAM=on&includeFM=on&includeHD=&includeLPFM=
or http://radiotime.com/channel/c_57922/News.aspx, open a few streams and watch the %CPU skyrocket. (I often channel-flip between several streams.)
3. Document the results.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for a second, third and fourth browser.
5. Repeat steps as needed on other test boxes. Repeat everything as needed.
6. Send the documentation of these tests to engineering.
7. Engineering: Replicate results and review all documentation.
8. Make Safari much more resource efficient than any other browser.
Steve can then demo this to the world and everyone will have another insanely great day!
Thanks for another great demo today Steve.
John
The long and short of it is that many websites today are very resource intensive. The workaround is to share the load among two to four different browsers. This workaround works every time. The browser-builders will have to make the final fixes.
Thanks,
John

High CPU usages for CCM 5.1

Hii all,
I am using 4 nos. of CCM5.1( 2 nos.of
CCM7835 & 2 nos. of CCM7815). Now only total 50 nos. of IP Phones connected with those server. but In NMS Spectrum, showing more than 95% CPU Useges and indicating Critical Error for all 4 nos. of CCM Server.
What can I do for it.plzzz..help me as soon as possible..

hii jsivulka,
thanks for reply...may I know about CSA ....
may I disable it for decrease the CPU Usages..
plzzz help me
Thanks and regards
Madhab

High CPU usage for bpel

Hi all,
We successfully deployed sample application FusionOrderDemo_R1PS2 to weblogic server,but it consumed much CPU.
Then we did a jprofile, found a thread of com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.Sweeper.run is CPU killer.
Is any developer here? Can you tell me what this thread work for and how to avoid this?
Thanks.

Better you raise an SR with Oracle Support. they should be able to help you understand what is going on with CPU usage.
.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch package -> The dispatcher layer is at the core of the bpel engine, and every request (e.g. to activate a scope, or start a process runs through the dispatch layer, by calling endrequest in the cube engine). If you need a detailed view of messages that are sent around (e.g. to expire or callback an activity), this is the place to go. [http://prsync.com/oracle/helping-oracle-support-to-help-you-5693/]

High CPU usage for BEASVC OATS

We are experience high cpu utilization after a few days of restarting the service. OATS is currently being used to track issues. Eventually the service needs to be stopped and restarted as the system will be unusable. Attached is the image from resource manager.

forgot to mention: OS is solaris 9

Satellite T130-10T: High CPU usage for non apparent reason

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for