Save takes MUCH longer with images placed

When I have images placed in Illustrator, even just a few small ones, Save takes much longer..so long that it can be 20 seconds before I even see the progress bar, and after that the saving actually happens.
Is there a way around this, or are we stuck wtih mind-numbing save times when we have raster elements placed in Illustrator?
thank you!
CS6, OS X 10.8.4
w

when you 'place' images, they may, by default, be embedded...
unless you check the 'link' box

Similar Messages

Saving images takes much longer now?

About six weeks ago, saving images started to take much longer than they used to
. Elements 11.

I have been doing all kinds of editing - it doesn't seem to make much difference what or if I save as JPEG or TIFF. I am using Windows 7. I am saving to the original folder. I have saved and closwed these files from the Editor. The Organizer freezes and I just have to wait to do anything else?
Thanks

FCPro Render times - much longer with different Sequence?

Has anyone else noticed this? For many years I have worked with just a few Sequences in FCPro, and the render times seem to be similar in them all - at least that I've noticed. When I slow motion scenes, or render simple graphics - I kind of have a feel for how long I have to wait for various things. Both with my MacBook Pro (2010) and Mac Tower (2 years old). I've always found render times, not excessive. Usually I've worked with DVCProHD.
BUT NOW . . . I'm noticing I'm waiting 2 to 3 times longer for any render. By NOW, I mean since I bought the XF300 and am natively importing 50mbs 12x720 footage into FCPro. (I overcrank a lot, so I tend to stay with 720.) It can now be done after the firmware upgrade a few months back. I love how much faster "native" import is, and I love it using 50mbs as it should, not 70mbs, which it did using ProRez import.
BUT I'm noticing much longer times to render in the XDCAM 422 720p30. Render screen says "conforming edited MPEG-2." Of course, this takes away some of the excitement, and is downright annoying! Has anyone else noticed this, or is it just me? Can render times change significantly, depending simply on the timeline Sequence setting? If they do, I'll just live with it - but I need reassuring that it's normal to take much 2 or 3 times the time - or I'm kinda hoping I'm doing something wrong!
Thanks,
Larry

OK Shane, I've done a bit of work here - this might surprise you? Maybe you'll learn something, we'll find out. But you've certainly been helpful to me!
OK, I took a 5 minute Sequence, shot with the Canon XF300, imported natively into FCPro. The test here is to now render in XDCAN vs. render in Prorez. I LOVE Logging & Transferring in NATIVE as the files are 30% smaller (50mbs vs. 70mbs - and that goes for the ProRez exports as Self Contained movies, too - 70 vs. 50mbs.)
So now it gets interesting . . . to render the 5 minute movie using XDCAM HD rendering (same codec) as importing footage = 5 minutes to render the timeline. Not much rendering was needed. Coincidentally, 5:00 even to render about a 5 minute movie. The total render "space" it used was 932meg.
Now . . . I did the same render (after I deleted all renders) but this time I had it render in ProRez instead. It took 3:30. Soooo, it saved 1:30 in the rendering process. GOOD! So we "learned" FCPro renders faster in ProRez as compared with XDCAM, which is exactly what you said! Oh, it ony used 832 meg for the ProRez renders, which means not only is ProRez faster to render, but it uses about 10% less space to actually "do"it.
But here's the GLITCH I can't explain. I then exported to self contained movie (which we normally do in our workflow, master to a self contained movie to save). In the XDCAM render sequence, it takes 1:35 to export to self contained movie, about normal for a 5 minute movie. But the ProRez render took almost 6 minutes to export!!
WHY would it take over 3 times longer to export the ProRez sequence compared to the XDCAM sequence? This is what didn't make sense to me. (I'm wondering maybe in the export process, FCPro doesn't "see" the (ProRez) renders and has to rerender it just to export it? And that's why the export time is so much longer with ProRez? What do you think?
So to sum up, NATIVE import is faster and smaller files. Then ProRez render is faster and smaller files. So I'll do that! BUT then it takes longer to export the "ProRez" rendered Sequence You just can't win!!! If you have a 60 minute timeline, it's seriously longer!
Do your findings parallel mine? Anyway, thanks for your time, and if you can't tinker with this, I certainly understand. I'm just trying to setup a workflow here. I've tested this 3 times, my results are consistent.
Thanks again,
Larry

After installing update takes much longer to go to sleep

After I installed the latest security update (2005-08) I noticed that my powerbook takes much longer now to go to sleep. In fact it can now take somewhere around 30 seconds to finally show me the blinking eye (or whatever that is called). Before the update, it went to sleep in just a few seconds, it never took that long. Has anyone else noticed this behavior?
This is a powerbook G4 with 10.4.2.

Ok, please forget about this post. It's amazing what a reboot can do
nick

AE CC - saving projects takes much longer than in CS6

I've noticed that After Effects CC takes much longer to save my current project than previously (about 2-3 minutes). I'm used to saving quite often so this is slowing down my workflow.
The project was imported from AE CS6. I've tried starting a new project and importing the previous one manually (instead of a conversion). Same lag.
All unused footage has been taken out and the footage has been consolidated.
The AE CS6 project file and AE CC file are about 15mb so CC is not any bigger.
There are about 50 files in Arri Raw 3K, the rest is in DPX and ProRes 1080p.
I'm working from a Macbook Pro Retina 16GB Ram and all media and cache are on an external Lacie Big Disk thunderbolt Raid SSD.
My impression is that AE CC is indexing all the files before saving so it's going through all the RAW sequenced files. This could slow down the saving process quite a lot.
Is anyone experiencing the same lag time while saving projects?

I'm having the same issue on my PC, saving is taking much longer and is also happening every time I RAM preview. Very strange, and in fact now its having trouble accessing the save location, a local hard drive. any answers for this isse?

Fetching null records out of a function takes much longer than non-null

Hi,
We have a function that is called thousands of times on SQL. This function has a SELECT than can return one row at max.
We realized that when the SQL statement doesn't return any record, it takes 3x times longer in the fetch phase.
I made a simple test with three functions were each one was executed 1000 times. The first one has an extra outer join that guarantees that it always returns one record, a second one with an explicit cursor that can return 0 records and a third one with an implicit cursor that can also return 0 records.
Here is the sample test code:
DECLARE
-- Local variables here
CURSOR c IS
SELECT teste_vasco.teste_vasco1(epis.id_episode) as val
FROM episode epis
WHERE rownum <= 1000;
TYPE t_c IS TABLE OF c%ROWTYPE;
l_c t_c;
BEGIN
-- Test statements here
OPEN c;
FETCH c BULK COLLECT
INTO l_c;
CLOSE c;
          for i in l_c.first..l_c.last
          loop
          dbms_output.put_line(i || ' :' || l_c(i).val);
          end loop;
END;
The difference between the tests is that instead of calling the vasco1 function, vasco2 and vasco3 is called.
###Test1
-Function vasco1:
FUNCTION teste_vasco1(i_episode IN episode.id_episode%TYPE) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
l_dt_set TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
l_flg_stage VARCHAR2(3);
l_dt_warn TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
CURSOR c_care_stage IS
SELECT cs.dt_set, cs.flg_stage, cs.dt_warn
FROM episode epis
LEFT JOIN care_stage cs ON (cs.id_episode = epis.id_episode AND cs.flg_active = 'Y')
WHERE epis.id_episode = i_episode;
BEGIN
OPEN c_care_stage;
FETCH c_care_stage
INTO l_dt_set, l_flg_stage, l_dt_warn;
CLOSE c_care_stage;
IF l_dt_set IS NULL
THEN
RETURN NULL;
END IF;
RETURN l_dt_set || l_flg_stage || l_dt_warn;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
pk_alert_exceptions.raise_error(error_code_in => SQLCODE, text_in => SQLERRM);
pk_alert_exceptions.reset_error_state;
RETURN NULL;
END teste_vasco1;
-Trace file:
SELECT TESTE_VASCO.TESTE_VASCO1(EPIS.ID_EPISODE) AS VAL
FROM
EPISODE EPIS WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.01 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.04 0.06 0 8 0 1000
total        3      0.06       0.07          0          8          0        1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1000 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=2035 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN EPIS_EPISODE_INFO_UI (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=1030 us)(object id 153741)
SELECT CS.DT_SET, CS.FLG_STAGE, CS.DT_WARN
FROM
EPISODE EPIS LEFT JOIN CARE_STAGE CS ON (CS.ID_EPISODE = EPIS.ID_EPISODE AND
CS.FLG_ACTIVE = 'Y') WHERE EPIS.ID_EPISODE = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1000 0.07 0.05 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1000 0.01 0.02 0 4001 0 1000
total     2001      0.09       0.07          0       4001          0        1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 2)
###Test2
-Function vasco2:
FUNCTION teste_vasco2(i_episode IN episode.id_episode%TYPE) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
l_dt_set TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
l_flg_stage VARCHAR2(3);
l_dt_warn TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
CURSOR c_care_stage IS
SELECT cs.dt_set, cs.flg_stage, cs.dt_warn
FROM care_stage cs
WHERE cs.id_episode = i_episode
AND cs.flg_active = 'Y';
BEGIN
OPEN c_care_stage;
FETCH c_care_stage
INTO l_dt_set, l_flg_stage, l_dt_warn;
IF c_care_stage%NOTFOUND
THEN
CLOSE c_care_stage;
RETURN NULL;
END IF;
CLOSE c_care_stage;
IF l_dt_set IS NULL
THEN
RETURN NULL;
END IF;
RETURN l_dt_set || l_flg_stage || l_dt_warn;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
pk_alert_exceptions.raise_error(error_code_in => SQLCODE, text_in => SQLERRM);
pk_alert_exceptions.reset_error_state;
RETURN NULL;
END teste_vasco2;
-Trace File:
SELECT TESTE_VASCO.TESTE_VASCO2(EPIS.ID_EPISODE) AS VAL
FROM
EPISODE EPIS WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.27 0 8 0 1000
total        3      0.00       0.27          0          8          0        1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1000 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=2048 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN EPIS_EPISODE_INFO_UI (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=1045 us)(object id 153741)
SELECT CS.DT_SET, CS.FLG_STAGE, CS.DT_WARN
FROM
CARE_STAGE CS WHERE CS.ID_EPISODE = :B1 AND CS.FLG_ACTIVE = 'Y'
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1000 0.03 0.05 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1000 0.00 0.00 0 2001 0 1
total     2001      0.03       0.06          0       2001          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 2)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CARE_STAGE (cr=2001 pr=0 pw=0 time=11082 us)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN CS_EPIS_FACT_FST_I (cr=2000 pr=0 pw=0 time=7815 us)(object id 688168)
###Test3
-Function vasco3
FUNCTION teste_vasco3(i_episode IN episode.id_episode%TYPE) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
l_dt_set TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
l_flg_stage VARCHAR2(3);
l_dt_warn TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE;
BEGIN
BEGIN
SELECT cs.dt_set, cs.flg_stage, cs.dt_warn
INTO l_dt_set, l_flg_stage, l_dt_warn
FROM care_stage cs
WHERE cs.id_episode = i_episode
AND cs.flg_active = 'Y';
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_data_found THEN
RETURN NULL;
END;
IF l_dt_set IS NULL
THEN
RETURN NULL;
END IF;
RETURN l_dt_set || l_flg_stage || l_dt_warn;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
pk_alert_exceptions.raise_error(error_code_in => SQLCODE, text_in => SQLERRM);
pk_alert_exceptions.reset_error_state;
RETURN NULL;
END teste_vasco3;
-Trace file:
SELECT TESTE_VASCO.TESTE_VASCO3(EPIS.ID_EPISODE) AS VAL
FROM
EPISODE EPIS WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.25 0.27 0 8 0 1000
total        3      0.25       0.27          0          8          0        1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1000 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=2033 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN EPIS_EPISODE_INFO_UI (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=1031 us)(object id 153741)
SELECT CS.DT_SET, CS.FLG_STAGE, CS.DT_WARN
FROM
CARE_STAGE CS WHERE CS.ID_EPISODE = :B1 AND CS.FLG_ACTIVE = 'Y'
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1000 0.07 0.06 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1000 0.00 0.00 0 2001 0 1
total     2001      0.07       0.06          0       2001          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 2)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CARE_STAGE (cr=2001 pr=0 pw=0 time=11119 us)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN CS_EPIS_FACT_FST_I (cr=2000 pr=0 pw=0 time=7951 us)(object id 688168)
As you can see, in the first example the fetch time of the SELECT in the function vasco1 takes 0.02 seconds and 0.06 in the SELECT of the test script. This test returned 1000 non-null records.
In the tests 2 and 3, the fetch phase of the SELECT in the test script takes much more time - 0.27 seconds, despite the fetch of the SELECT in the functions (vasco2 and vasco3) took 0.00 seconds (as it only returned 1 row for the 1000 executions) and the only difference between them is the function that is called. Both test2 and test3 returned 999 null records and 1 non-null record.
How it's possible than a select null records takes much longer than selecting non-null records?
Hope you can understand the problem and thank you in advance for any help or suggestions.

Thank you for the replies...
But the thing is that the SELECT in the function is very fast and the fetch phase takes no time (0.00 second).
And, as you can see in the execution plan, there's no need for a full index scan...only a range scan is performed:
SELECT CS.DT_SET, CS.FLG_STAGE, CS.DT_WARN
FROM
CARE_STAGE CS WHERE CS.ID_EPISODE = :B1 AND CS.FLG_ACTIVE = 'Y'
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1000 0.07 0.06 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1000 0.00 0.00 0 2001 0 1
total     2001      0.07       0.06          0       2001          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 286 (recursive depth: 2)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CARE_STAGE (cr=2001 pr=0 pw=0 time=11119 us)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN CS_EPIS_FACT_FST_I (cr=2000 pr=0 pw=0 time=7951 us)(object id 688168)
But, the fetch phase of the SQL that calls the function that has this query takes 0,27 seconds.
As far as the contex switch, we are aware of that, but we can have modularity with this solution and the first function also have many context switching and is must faster.
Edited by: Pretender on Mar 18, 2009 3:38 PM

After installing VS 2013 my Excel/Word/PowerPoint 2010 student edition takes much longer to start-up...

Hi,
After installing Visual Studio Community 2013, my Excel/Word/PowerPoint 2010 student edition takes much longer to start-up. Whenever I open Excel/Work/PowerPoint, the Windows Installer configures VS Studio 2013 each time. Is this the normal behavior, can
I stop this?

Thank you for your response.
I actually found the answer I was looking for through a couple of URL's below:
1. This first URL walked me through everything I needed to do find the actual warning using the Event Viewer and then the fix. There are two command for the suggested fix (remove and addlocal registry items) but since I don't think MS Office 2010 student
edition came with VBA support (I could be wrong), I only did the REMOVE command. After that, launching my Office apps now only takes a couple of seconds instead of 2-3 minutes. Here's the first URL (http):
Since I'm not allowed to post a link yet:
The blog is from MSDN by Heath Stewart (MSFT) dated May 29, 2009 "how-to-workaround-the-issue-when-opening-office-applications-repairs-visual-studio"
2. The second URL (https) below is from a forum with similar issue that confirmed what I had to do. In this forum the helpee ran the suggested two commands and had the same warning:
Since I'm not allowed to post a link yet:
This next URL is from Anne Jing's thread dated Jan 6-9, 2015:
So, I decided to do as helpee did.
Here are the details of my challenge and the fix I ran following the first URL above:
Following is the actual warning I was getting when launching Office apps:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MsiInstaller
Date:          1/23/15 12:12:30 PM
Event ID:      1001
Task Category: None
Level:         Warning
Keywords:      Classic
User:          Gerry-pavg6-HP\Gerry-pavg6
Computer:      Gerry-pavg6-HP
Description:
Detection of product '{9C593464-7F2F-37B3-89F8-7E894E3B09EA}', feature 'VB_for_VS_7_Pro_11320_x86_enu' failed during request for component '{9DE325B8-0C09-49EB-99AE-12284811D61C}'
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="MsiInstaller" />
    <EventID Qualifiers="0">1001</EventID>
    <Level>3</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-01-23T17:12:30.000000000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>51710</EventRecordID>
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer>Gerry-pavg6-HP</Computer>
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-21-3985824742-3742285712-2182756392-1002" />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data>{9C593464-7F2F-37B3-89F8-7E894E3B09EA}</Data>
    <Data>VB_for_VS_7_Pro_11320_x86_enu</Data>
    <Data>{9DE325B8-0C09-49EB-99AE-12284811D61C}</Data>
    <Data>(NULL)</Data>
    <Data>(NULL)</Data>
    <Data>(NULL)</Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
Fix:
I only run the 'REMOVE' command below for now because I didn't want to reinstall VS 2013 from the Internet, it needs >7GB to download) Jan23/15:
'REMOVE'
start /wait msiexec.exe /i {9C593464-7F2F-37B3-89F8-7E894E3B09EA} /L*vx "%TEMP%\1.remove.log" REMOVE=VB_for_VS_7_Pro_11320_x86_enu
'ADDLOCAL'
start /wait msiexec.exe /i {9C593464-7F2F-37B3-89F8-7E894E3B09EA} /L*vx "%TEMP%\2.addlocal.log" ADDLOCAL=VB_for_VS_7_Pro_11320_x86_enu TARGETDIR="%ProgramFiles%\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0"
Note: Please ensure to open the first URL above and follow the steps when running the REMOVE and ADDLOCAL commands above.

When purchased, my imac would load pages very quickly. Now, the pages seem to take much longer to load and when watching video or streaming, it often stops to catch up or rebuffer. What do I do to speed things up?

When I purchased my iMac last month the pages would load quickly when using the internet browser. Now it takes much longer to load the pages and when I watch a video it pauses to catch up or is rebuffering the streaming. What can I do to speed up my browser?

See:
Mac Maintenance Quick Assist,
Mac OS X speed FAQ,
Speeding up Macs,
Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance,
Essential Mac Maintenance: Get set up,
Essential Mac Maintenance: Rev up your routines,
Maintaining OS X,
Five Mac maintenance myths, and
Myths of required versus not required maintenance for Mac OS X for information.

It takes much longer time to power down.

Since i upgraded to mountainlion it takes much longer time to power down. As if the harddisk is being scanned. Anyone any thoughts on that ?
greetz,

Since i upgraded to mountainlion it takes much longer time to power down. As if the harddisk is being scanned. Anyone any thoughts on that ?
greetz,

PHP Image Gallery with Images placed every other paragraph

Currently I have multiple images that where uploaded to the details page of Post 1. Every other paragraph I have an image displayed. With say 5 images.
What I would like is that the user can click on the image and open up a gallery (on the same page, like Lightbox Gallery) and view through the other 4 images related to Post 1, as these images may not be full resolution on the details page.
If I understand correctly, Lightbox makes a small thumbnail preview of the images, which I don't want, and lists them like a Gallery (Next to each other). Can anyone direct me on the best way to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Riley

Sorry for the confusion, I didn't mean lightbox actually created the thumbnails, but it produces them similar to the link you provided which I don't want. My image uploader does create thumbnail images, but only one per new post.
My format is similar to this:
POST 1
Text Paragraph1 (Image1 )
Text Paragraph1 (               )
Text Paragraph1 (               )
Text Paragraph1 (               )
(Image2) Text Paragraph2
(               ) Text Paragraph2
(               ) Text Paragraph2
(               ) Text Paragraph2
Now what I would like is that they can click on the picture and it opens up the image at say 600px X 600px resolution, with the next/prev buttons so they can browse through only the picutres on this page.
I have been trying to find an example but seems that some take you to a different page of just the image you clicked on, or a new page with the gallery.
I like how the lightbox gallery opens up on the same page, that way you close out of it and can continue reading. But I want to be able to have the images placed in different positions on the page, and not in a row like with a Gallery.
I hope I help clarified what I am trying to do.

Recently I find that Firefox takes much longer to load up on my computer. What can I do?

I have been using Firefox for years. A couple of months ago I noticed that it takes a much longer time to load up on my screen. Has something changed with Firefox to cause it to slow down?

It is best to stay away from so called tweaking pref suggestions and leave them at their default.<br />
Some may work, but others may cause problems with some websites that may be hard to diagnose.
Try to create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.
See "Creating a profile":
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues
There may be extensions and plugins installed by default in a new profile, so check that in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions & Plugins" in case there are still problems.
If the new profile works then you can transfer some files from an existing profile to the new profile, but be careful not to copy corrupted files.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox
Another possible cause is security software (firewall,anti-virus) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
See:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls

Why Safari takes much long time than other browser to open a page?

I have used windows since start of my computing life... Now i have replaced my windows laptop to a macbook pro.. Everything is amazing.. except only one. Safari.. I experience it takes too long time for openning a webpage...even for a simple webpage...takes much more time for loading a flash... I dont know why Safari is taking too many times as compared to other web browsers...

I found the same problem too after moving into mac earlier this week....
i guess here's the solution https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5227588
try uninstall/unable the third party extension

After turning on, it takes much longer time to turn on. all the functions don't work.have to wait a long time

After I turn on my macbook, it takes a much longer time to turn on. I can move around the arrow, but nothing works. I tried to click every app, no response. I have to wait a long time and then everything works. Did I do something wrong?
Thanks

Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

How can unlocking possibly take so long with Orange Communications SA?

I bought a new Apple IPhone 3G without any price plan in Switzerland at an Orange Center and they told me to wait a couple of days until I get a message with an Activating Code in order for me to get my IPhone activated in Itunes with any SIM! Now I´ve been calling Apple and Orange a hundred times and they wouldn´t tell me how long this is going to take or who is in charge of it!!
My Phone is still not working/ can´t activate it over Itunes!!
Can anyone please tell me what the h**l makes them take so long to enter an IMEI-number in their fu**ing system to unlock an IPhone????!!
Message was edited by: Roland K.

I bought a new Apple IPhone 3G without any price plan in Switzerland at an Orange Center and they told me to wait a couple of days until I get a message with an Activating Code in order for me to get my IPhone activated in Itunes with any SIM! Now I´ve been calling Apple and Orange a hundred times and they wouldn´t tell me how long this is going to take or who is in charge of it!!
My Phone is still not working/ can´t activate it over Itunes!!
Can anyone please tell me what the h**l makes them take so long to enter an IMEI-number in their fu**ing system to unlock an IPhone????!!
Message was edited by: Roland K.

Upgraded to OSX 10.9.1 and now Pages (iWork '08) takes much longer to launch.

Initial launch of Pages takes significantly longer to load after upgrading OSX. I have used 'software update', but nothing out there to download. Any ideas? The other components of my iWork '08 bundle work as expected, it is only Pages that seems to have performance issues under OSX 10.9.1.

If I remember, I believe I thought I had to upgrade to Mavericks for a feature related to sharing or FaceTime or something. I have an iMac, 2 MacBook Pro laptops (kids), an iPad (wife's) and Apple TV. So on Mavericks, everyone in the house is happy now; I just don't like that it takes 'forever' to launch Pages. Perhaps I will upgrade to iWork '09 to see if that takes care of the issue.

Save takes MUCH longer with images placed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for