Saveing the OBJECT GROUP

Hi Experts,
I've created Object Group which consists of (alert, parameters, visual attribute and property class).
Now I want to save this Object Group.
Please help me to save it.

You can't save it on it's own.
I'm guessing what you want to do is use it as a shared component with all your Forms ?
In this case what you need to do is create an object library (olb) and copy the object group into the object library module (then open the object library and then drag your object group into it).
Then you can drag the object group from the object library into your other Forms (referencing it now rather than copying it).
That's just a guess at what you'd like to do : for more information have a search for object libraries and referencing components.
HTH
Steve

Similar Messages

  • Error while saving the objects in ID

    Dear All,
    When I am saving the objects in ID, I am facing with the following error:
    <b>[SAP_NWMss][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]Could not allocate space for object 'XI_DIRDATACHANNEL' in database 'XD1' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full</b>
    Please guide how to solve this error.
    Warm regards,
    n.jain

    Hi Nishu,
    ask your xi basis guys to see the disk space of your xi system.........i think the log files of your xi system have consumed too much space on your xi system.... ask your basis guys to make some space available in your xi system then your this problem will be resolved.......
    Thanks,
    Rajeev Gupta

  • Problem in saving the objects(urgent)

    hi experts,
      I have saved my objects in one request number.Now i want to save the same object in some other request number how to do that.Please provide the solution.
    thanks n regards,
    Ashok.

    Hello Ashok
    If your objects are workbench objects then they can be locked only in a single transport request.
    However, if you want to shuffle objects from one request to another (perhaps they belong together but have been separated into different request by accident) then you can merge the two requests into a single request (transaction SE10): use menu <b>Utilities -> Reorganize -> Merge Request</b>
    Regards
       Uwe

  • Exclude partners when saving the target group

    Hi experts!!
    I have the following requirement: i need to automatically exlude some contacts (e.g. blocked contacts) when creating a target group.
    Is there any BADI or other exit which is called "on save" of the target group???
    Thank you in advance!!!

    Hi,
    you could also try to build up a Segmentation Basis containing all the partners that can potentially be included in your Target Group. But for low volume segmentation this can get very performance critical if the Segmentation Basis contains many partners.
    I don't believe there is a possibility to directly exclude them when generating the Target Group
    Best Regards
    Klaus

  • Problem subclassing an object group from an object library

    Hi
    I've created an object group using Forms 6i (can't tell you the exact version just now) containing a number of objects, including a couple of alerts, a couple of data blocks, canvas, window, program units etc. I've saved the object group into an object library and used it successfully for some time. Now I've gone to a new job, I suspect that I'm using a subtly different version of Forms 6i (6.0.8.16.1), but I'm finding a strange behaviour when I try to add the object group to a form.
    Dragging the object group over, I get the 'Do you want to copy or subclass the object?' message. If I select 'Copy', everything gets copied across fine - the datablocks have all the items in them and the program units are fine. However, if I select 'Subclass', the items all appear in the object navigator, but are 'empty', so the data blocks contain no items and the program units are just 'begin' and 'end' statements with nothing in between.
    Funnily enough, if I 'copy' the object group into a form (so everything's present), then create another copy of the object group in the current version of Form Builder and save it in a (new) object library, the behaviour is still the same.
    Has anyone come across this situation before (I couldn't find anything exactly comparable on Metalink), and what workaround (if any) did you find?
    regards
    Andrew
    UK

    Hi again
    The answer to this strange behaviour became apparent when I found bug 2772326 on Metalink.
    Basically, either the OLB has to be on the FORMS60_PATH, or the option in Forms Builder under Tools->Preferences->Access->Subclassing Path has to be set to 'Keep' rather than 'Remove'. Doing either of these things solves the problem.
    regards
    Andrew

  • Attaching the WebUtil object group to a form

    Hi. I'm hoping for some help on how to attach the WebUtil object group to a form. I go to the Object Groups node in the object navigator and click the '+' button, but I'm not prompted to attach .olb files. How do I do this? Without it attached I'm receiving the message "The WebUtil object group is not available in this form. WebUtil cannot work." when I run my application. Thanks in advance.

    Okay I opened the .obl and it appears under the Object Libraries Node. Then I double-click on the Object Groups node in my form and it simply creates a new object named OBJECT_GROUP100. I can't seem to drag and drop from the Libraries Node to the Object Groups node in my form. It just shows a circle with a line through it indicating that I can't drag it. Any suggestions? (Sorry, I've not done this before).

  • Added webutil object group with JDAPI - adjust the webutil block sequence ?

    Hi all,
    I'm using the JDAPI to subclass in the webutil object group into Forms in an application. Annoyingly, the webutil block becomes the first block on the Form - which means on some Forms it displays on startup. Is there anyway (programmatically using JDAPI) that I can move the block the end of the block list after I've subclassed in the object group ?
    TIA
    Steve

    Hello,
    move
    void move(JdapiObject nextObject)
    Reorders an object with respect to its siblings in the collection it belongs to. This is similar to using drag and drop in Form Builder to move a block in a list. This method represents a way to do the same thing programmatically. For example, if you want a block appear immediately before Block5 in a list, you pass the object representing Block5 as the nextObject argument.
    Pass null to this method to move the object to the end of the list. If the specified object and the next_object do not share the same owner, or do not have the same type, the method throws an exception.
    You cannot use this method to move objects between parents. For example, it cannot be used to move an Item from one Block to another. If you want to move an object from one parent to another you will have to do something like:
    // to move 'itmA' to be positioned before 'itmB' in block
    // 'blkB' (when 'itmA' is in another block)
    // copy itmA into a new parent (blkB) using same name
    Item newItmA = itmA.clone(blkB, itmA.getName());
    newItmA.move(itmB); // move new item relative to itmB
    itmA.destroy(); // delete original object
    itmA = newItmA;
    Parameters:
    nextObject - the object next to which the specified object is to be moved.
    Throws:
    JdapiException - if you attempt to move an object next to an object that does not share the same owner or is not of the same type.
    Francois

  • Error while saving for Objective setting

    Hi,
    While saving the Objective setting templates i am getting the error as "Table HRPAD605 is not part of the Customizing object PDST T "
    <u>Error documentation is as follows</u>
    <b>Diagnosis</b>
    Entries in table HRPAD605 cannot be edited in connection with customizing object PDST      T as table HRPAD605 does not belong to customizing object PDST      T, according to the object definition.
    <b>System Response</b>
    The function terminates.
    <b>Procedure</b>
    Check whether the entered objects and keys are correct.Then check in the Implementation Guide whether the object was created correctly.
    Correct the object definition or the entry for the Transport Organizer interface.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    Most likely the is an inconsistency with the transport objects PDST and PDWS. Please run RHSOBJCH to correct this inconsistency.
    Afterwards you should be able to transport the templates via the catalog or via RHMOVE30. Please make sure that the category ID in the target system is the same otherwise you won't be able to locate the template.
    The report RHSOBJCH corrects the missing HR entries in the OBJS table.
    This step you need to perform only once. For OSA you need to overtake
    *5020 up to *5026, also PAD605,606 and 607 references.
    When you have done this (as said, only need to do it once) you can transport the categories and templates via the phap_catalog_pa transaction (righ-mouse click on the to be transported object).
    Hope this helps,
    Regards and Groetjes,
    Maurice

  • Object-group with network-object containing an IP address range

    Hello,
    Does the ASA treat an object-group with a network-object containing a range of IP addresses as a netmask? For example, I can apply this configuration without the ASA throwing any errors though the configuration calls for a 'net mask':
    object-group network test
    network-object 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255
    network-object-group mode commands/options:
      A.B.C.D  Enter an IPv4 network mask
    sh run ob id test
    object-group network test
    network-object 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255
    I found that in the documentation it requires a netmask as oppose to a range. Is this a bug in the code? I am running code version 8.0(5)23 on a 5520. If this is not a bug how does the ASA treat this type of configuration when applied to an access list? When I ran a quick packet trace and denied access from that range it looks like the ASA doesn't read that configuration properly. Thank you.
    -John

    Hello,
    Thank you for your replies. In code version 8.0(5)23, it appears I am able to define a "range" of IP addresses as in:
    192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255 as opposed to defining a range with a netmask like 192.168.0.0 255.255.192.0.
    With the "range" of IP address applied to the "object-group network test" with sub command "network-object 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255" the ASA does not pick up on said "range" when this object group is applied to a DENY access list. It only reads it properly when the netmask is attached, which is the correct configuration, as in: "network-object 192.168.0.0 255.255.192.0".
    To clarify, I mean range as in 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.63.255.
    Hope this helps to understand. I am just curious as to why this is even able to be applied in such a way or if it is a bug in this particular code version? I can also confirm that this can be done in code version 8.4(2). See below snippets of my configuration in the 8.4(2) code version:
    access-list 101 line 3 extended deny ip object-group testmask any 0x577f55a8
      access-list 101 line 3 extended deny ip 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255 any (hitcnt=0) 0x0623b0c4
    access-list 101 line 4 extended permit tcp any any eq 89 (hitcnt=1) 0x36f1e5cd
    Packet trace results in allowing the "range" of IP address:
    Result:
    input-interface: outside
    input-status: up
    input-line-status: up
    output-interface: dmztest
    output-status: up
    output-line-status: up
    Action: allow
    Now with the "correct" configuration:
    access-list 101 line 3 extended deny ip object-group testmask any 0x577f55a8
      access-list 101 line 3 extended deny ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.192.0 any (hitcnt=1) 0xa31c6bbd
    access-list 101 line 4 extended permit tcp any any eq 89 (hitcnt=1) 0x36f1e5cd
    Result:
    input-interface: outside
    input-status: up
    input-line-status: up
    output-interface: dmztest
    output-status: up
    output-line-status: up
    Action: drop
    Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
    Thank you.
    -John

  • Subclass webutil object group problem

    Hi,
    I am using 10g form.
    I download the webutil demo and got a form called WU_TEST_106 in which there is
    a object group called WEBUTIL.
    Then I create a new form and drag the object group WEBUTIL of the form
    WU_TEST_106 to the object group of the new form and choose 'subclass'.
    When I check the content of the WEBUTIL data block in the new form, there
    is no items there.
    There should be some bean area such as WEBUTIL_FILE_FUNCTIONS and
    WEBUTIL_HOST_FUNCTIONS etc.
    Anyone can help ?
    Ivan

    Do not subclass WEBUTIL from another form. In folder <DevSuiteHome>\forms there should exist file webutil.olb. Open this file directly in Form Builder using
       File | Open
    and subclass the objects contained within.
    Eric Adamson
    Lansing, Michigan

  • CSCut57898 - C897 ACL object-group leak/miss for BGP tcp 179 / causing deny

    We appear to be seeing this bug, or something very similar, on a 3845 running 15.1(4)M9 (c3845-adventerprisek9-mz.151-4.M9.bin), and a 3945 running 15.1(1)T (c3900e-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-1.T.bin). On both platforms traffic that should be (and most often is) matching an object-group ACE is sometimes "falling through" that ACE and hitting ACEs below the object-group based ACE that it should have matched. Depending on the ACEs in question, this sometimes results in traffic that should be permitted falling into a later deny, or more troubling, traffic that should be denied falling into a subsequent permit.
    I am particularly curious to know if this may be related to http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=37423 and https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCun21071 and whether there is a fix.
    Anyone who is working on this is welcome to contact me directly. I have crystal clear logging of traffic falling through ACEs on these systems, and I would be happy to assist in any way I can. I would really like to get this problem solved, it is causing me a great deal of grief and frustration.  

    We appear to be seeing this bug, or something very similar, on a 3845 running 15.1(4)M9 (c3845-adventerprisek9-mz.151-4.M9.bin), and a 3945 running 15.1(1)T (c3900e-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-1.T.bin). On both platforms traffic that should be (and most often is) matching an object-group ACE is sometimes "falling through" that ACE and hitting ACEs below the object-group based ACE that it should have matched. Depending on the ACEs in question, this sometimes results in traffic that should be permitted falling into a later deny, or more troubling, traffic that should be denied falling into a subsequent permit.
    I am particularly curious to know if this may be related to http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=37423 and https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCun21071 and whether there is a fix.
    Anyone who is working on this is welcome to contact me directly. I have crystal clear logging of traffic falling through ACEs on these systems, and I would be happy to assist in any way I can. I would really like to get this problem solved, it is causing me a great deal of grief and frustration.  

  • Using Object Group.

    I am using the forms 6i. And i have a problem with attach Object Group.
    After attach, the form do not execute.
    I have a question: What the values the Object Group utility on the registry?
    Or if another sugestion...
    Thanks, so much.
    Martônio.

    1. Did you copy the object group to the new module or subclassed it?
    R- Subclass.
    2. Did you compile your form module after doing copy/subclass of the object group?
    R- Yes.
    3. Did you get any compilation error/warning?
    R-No. Because the form close before display.
    4. Is the base object group is from a form or a object library?
    R-Object Library.
    5. Is the base form / object library in which the object group exists is there in the FORMS60_PATH?
    R-Yes.
    Thanks. So much....
    Martônio.

  • Subclass / Object Group / Object Library error?

    Forms [32 Bit] Version 10.1.2.0.2 (Production)
    I am experiencing a strange problem with classes, object groups and object libraries - I have tried all sorts of combinations, but I always get the same problem.
    1. Create a form
    2. Creat a property class - PC1 and add a when-button-pressed trigger that does 'null'
    3. Create another property class PC2 that subclasses PC1 - note that the trigger is inherited correctly and the Triger Text shows the inheritance arrow in the property sheet.
    4. Create an object group in the form - OBJ1 - and add these two classes.
    5. Create a new obejct library and copy the OBJ1 object group.
    It is at this point that things go wrong! If you now look back at the PC2 class - the inheritance chain of the trigger code has now been broken?
    Well - it ALWAYS is my system - I have tried all sorts of combinations - including changing paths, forms_path, registry etc. etc. but I am coming to the conclusion that it is a bug?
    Can anyone confirm that they experience the same problem?
    Regards,
    Bren

    Thanks Gerd!
    I have tried on 10g on several machines (some identical) and some with different paths (FORMS_PATH etc.) - but I always get the inherited trigger code disassociated.
    Also - and slightly strange, before I copy the object group, the properites of the trigger are perfect and the trigger code shows the inherited arrow. Directly after copying the object group, the trigger code property sheet has the un-inherited red cross, but, if I close the Form, I am not prompted to save the changes? So it's like Forms is making the change, but not internally marking the form as being changed.
    Let me know how you get on with 10g - and thanks for your input!
    Regards,
    Bren

  • Breaking Subclass/Removing Object Group/Without loss of code for child form

    Hi all..
    This is regarding Forms 10g (breaking inheritance)
    I have a base form as well as client form.
    The child form is having some properties as common to the base form. so child form is having sub class(inheritance) from the base class with the help of Object Group. This is the exiting setup
    Now, client wants the same information as child form with out link with base form.
    i.e., they want to remove the Object Group with out distrubing the child form.
    Finally, they want the child form as independant from base form. i.e., child form should not have inheritance from the base form and at the same time they don't want to loss of any code to the child form.
    There are 1000's of forms like that are need to re-work.
    Is there any tool/script available to do this process of work automatically.
    Please provide the necessary deatils and help me regarding this.
    Regards
    Madhava

    You CAN add new items to the subclassed block or change triggers code or even add new triggers. Form Builder won't let you create items in-between existing subclassed items or triggers. So if you need to create a new item, create at the end of subclassed item or trigger...
    You can not DELETE items of subclassed block or the block itself if it is subclassed. But you can remove the subclassed object from your child module --- by removing class info from the object group in child module --- but it will also remove all the subclassed child objects.
    If you delete or change anything in master object, it will directly affect the subclassed object and you can see the change immediatly in the child modules.
    When you drag the master object to child, it asks you if you need to subclass or copy, selecting copy will create a separate copy which you can play with in the child module.
    And below is brief help on the matter:
    If you don't want all the objects in the subclassed object group, then you might consider either subclassing the desired objects individually, or creating an object group which contains only the desired objects.
    Edited by: Zaafran Ahmed on Oct 13, 2010 12:41 PM

  • Access list with multiple object groups

    Hello Everyone,
    I am using a cisco ASA 5525 with 8.6 code.  I am trying to setup access list for oubound access meaning hosts accessing the internet.  I have created an access list called outbound_access and did "access-groupc outbound_access in interface inside "
    I am trying to use object-groups where ever i can.  Here is an example.
    object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
    service-object tcp destination eq 443
    service-object tcp destination eq 80
    service-object tcp destination eq 7734
    service-object tcp destination eq 7752
    service-object udp destination eq 7351
    object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
    network-object 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240
    network-object 10.5.11.0 255.255.225.240
    object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
    des This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki. 
      network-object host 64.156.192.154
      network-object host 64.62.142.12
      network-object host 64.62.142.2
      network-object host 74.50.51.16
      network-object host 74.50.56.218
    object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
    service-object tcp destination eq 443
    service-object tcp destination eq 80
    service-object tcp destination eq 7734
    service-object tcp destination eq 7752
    service-object udp destination eq 7351
    object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
    network-object 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
    network-object 10.x.x.x 255.255.225.240
    object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
    des This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki. 
      network-object host 64.156.192.154
      network-object host 64.62.142.12
      network-object host 64.62.142.2
      network-object host 74.50.51.16
      network-object host 74.50.56.218
    I have tried tying all these groups together in multiple ways but cannot figure out how to do this.  This what i think it should be "access-list outbound_access extended permit object-group obj_Meraki_outbound object-group obj_Meraki_lan object-group obj_Meraki_pub"
    What i want is the use the service objects and the source network would be obj_Meraki_lan and destination would be obj_Meraki_pub.   It seems the rules completely change when you use object groups.  Can someone explain this maybe with a few examples.  I am already using object groups in many acls but not for every element.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Seems to work on my test ASA
    Attached it to my current LAN interface.
    ASA(config)# packet-tracer input LAN tcp 10.2.11.1 12345 64.156.192.154 80
    Phase: 1
    Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
    Subtype: input
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    in   0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         WAN
    Phase: 2
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype: log
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    access-group outbound_access in interface LAN
    access-list outbound_access extended permit object-group obj_Meraki_outbound object-group obj_Meraki_lan object-group obj_Meraki_pub
    object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
    service-object tcp destination eq https
    service-object tcp destination eq www
    service-object tcp destination eq 7734
    service-object tcp destination eq 7752
    service-object udp destination eq 7351
    object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
    network-object 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240
    network-object 10.5.11.0 255.255.255.240
    object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
    description: This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki.
    network-object host 64.156.192.154
    network-object host 64.62.142.12
    network-object host 64.62.142.2
    network-object host 74.50.51.16
    network-object host 74.50.56.218
    Additional Information:
    access-list outbound_access line 1 extended permit tcp 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240 host 64.156.192.154 eq www (hitcnt=1) 0x4d812691
    Also have used such configuration in some special cases where the customer has insisted on allow specific TCP/UDP ports between multiple networks. And nothing is stopping from adding ICMP into the "object-group service" also.
    - Jouni

Maybe you are looking for