Saving from Camera Raw 6.7

I recently updated to Camera Raw 6.7 (within CS5) and I am having a problem saving files.
I open a raw file then use Save Image and try and save as a TIFF file.
If I use the same directory the image saves as a *.tif without any problem - however if I try and save to a new location then I am running into trouble.
The new location when selected does not appear in the "Save As " dialogue and when I try and save the image I get an error message saying the "File could not be created"
Any help appreciated - I have used this method in previous versions without a problem.
Thanks
Dave

After a bit more playing around I can get this to work - although it still acts strangely.
If, from the Save As dialogue box in ACR I click on "Select folder" and navigate to a new folder then press "Select" , the Save as dialogue re-appears but without any folder path shown. If I try and save the image at that point I get the error message.
However if instead of trying to Save the image I re-click on "Select Folder" and then click on "select" again, without changing anything, then the Save As dialogoue box re-appears but this time with the new folder path shown. If I now save the image it works.
Strange behaviour - but work-able. 
If it helps , I am using CS5 (12.04), ACR 6.7 on a 32-bit Vista system with SP 2
Dave

Similar Messages

  • How to open images in Fill Screen mode from Camera Raw

    I am using Photoshop CS4 for Windows. I created an action that executes Fit on Screen and set the Scripts Event Manager to execute that action on the Open Document event. This works when opening a document from Photoshop.
    Here are my questions:
    1) After opening a raw image from Bridge in Camera Raw, when I then open the image in Photoshop, it does not run the Open Document event action to Fit on Screen. What event do I need to set the action to execute on when opening an image from Camera Raw in Photoshop?
    2) I added Fit on Screen to the action by selecting Insert Menu Item from the Actions menu and then selecting View-Fit on Screen. I cannot find Fill Screen on any pull-down menu (the button found on the Hand tool bar). How can I insert the Fill Screen item (which fills the screen a little more than Fit on Screen?
    3) In the Scripts Events Manager, when you select Add an Event, it says Any scriptable event can be entered here. See the Scripting Reference for the full list of Photoshop event names.. On the following Adobe webpage, I found the Adobe Photoshop CS4 Scripting Guide but I did not find a list of Photoshop event names in that document. Where can I find the list of Photoshop event names?
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshop/scripting
    Thanks to anyone who can help me out.

    > 3) In the Scripts Events Manager, when you select Add an Event, it says Any scriptable event can be entered here. See the Scripting Reference for the full list of Photoshop event names.. On the following Adobe webpage, I found the Adobe Photoshop CS4 Scripting Guide but I did not find a list of Photoshop event names in that document. Where can I find the list of Photoshop event names?
    >
    >
    >
    See "Appendix A: Event ID Codes" in the PSCS4 JavaScript Reference pdf file that
    comes with PSCS4.
    -X

  • Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click w

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

  • My images are going from from camera raw to totally white in Photoshop CS6, I am using a Mac computer.

    I am using Photoshop CS6 and my images are opening up totally white from camera raw into photoshop.
    I am using a Mac. Just recently switched from PC to raw, and never had this problem.

    Is everything up to date?

  • Using Photoshop CC I cannot save images to folder from Camera Raw as Tif. I get message 'write permission error'. I am using Widows 7 Professional.

    I have just changed to Photoshop CC from CS4 and cannot now save images from Camera Raw. I get message 'write permission error'. I assume there is some permissions setting which did not exist with CS4.
    I cannot progress unless I revert to CS4. What am I failing to do?

    See if the suggestions, here, help, although this was back with CS6-cloud, not CC, so may not apply 100%:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4758115
    I'd suggest that rather than deleting the file, you move it out of the folder to somewhere else, in case things get worse and you need to put it back.
    I found this by Googling the error message. 
    If you can't figure it out, you might post in the "Downloading, Installing and Set Up" or "Adobe Creative Cloud" forums  since it seems to be related to the Cloud updates, and not necessarily ACR plug-in functionality, and I've seen India support people actually tackle problems posted there, which rarely happens in the ACR forum, although an ACR engineer may sometimes pop in to answer questions, they'd be less likely to know how to fix deployment issues.

  • I lose changes in the details when i open my photos from camera raw 7.0 to photoshop cs5, why?

    I lose changes that I made with the tools in the "Details" section, just right after I open my photos from camera raw 7.0 to photoshop cs5, why?   The changes that I made with the tools in the "Basic" section remain. 

    First, how and why are you using Camera Raw 7.0 with CS5? 
    ACR 7.x requires CS6 to run.
    Even if that's a typo in your post and you are running CS6 instead of CS5, no one should be running ACR 7.0, but ACR 8.4 —or at the very least 7.4.
    Once any given camera model is supported by a version of ACR, it will continue to be supported in all subsequent versions of ACR.  Each update to ACR has unannounced, unheralded bug fixes and improvements.  Running 7.0 at this point is sheer madness.
    Please clarify.
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand, such as your platform (Mac or Win), exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop and of Bridge, machine specs, what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far, what error message(s) you receive, if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them, etc., someone may be able to help you.
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • Image quality after opening from camera RAW

    Why does the image quality seem to get worse in Elements 11 once the image is opened up after editing from Camera RAW?  The image looks great in the RAW screen, then once opened in Photo editor it seems pixelated, smooth lines look jagged.  Is it something I am doing wrong?

    Try viewing at 25%, 50% or 75%

  • Cannot save files from Camera Raw in JPG format.

    Since running updates to my Adobe Elements 10 program recently I cannot save the files from Camera Raw in  JPG format any longer. I can save the files in other formats but not in JPG format. I need to save some files in JPG format to submit for a photographic course I am doing.
    Pleasae assist.
    My emailo contact is as below
    [email protected]

    Change to 8 bit for jpeg and then click open image.
    Click to view

  • Saving images from camera raw in new CC suite

    Hi Im having trouble re saving images from new adobe cc bridge camera raw, images once saved then show in bridge with no adjustments done in camera raw and the images are downsized to KB size images even from a 9.20mb raw image, Ive looked at setting or rather preferences and totally lost please help!!
    Thank you
    Jon

    This forum is actually about the Cloud, not about using individual programs
    Once your program downloads and installs with no errors, you need the program forum
    If you start at the Forums Index http://forums.adobe.com/index.jspa
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says ALL FORUMS) to open the drop down list and scroll
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/bridge

  • Quality Loss when saving Jpeg from Camera Raw

    I am try to do some color correction on 400 wedding photos. I open like photos in Camera Raw then synchronize, make a few additional adjustments and then save the photos as psd files. When I save the files, the quality drops dramatically. I can see pixels and jagged edges (looks like steps) on anything curved. The photographer will not give me the RAW files, so I have to work with these high quality jpegs and I would prefer to use camera raw as it is nice and easy to fix many of the photos quickly. How can I save these files so as to not lose quality? Oh, I am on a Mac.
    --K

    Ramón,
    now I am quite baffled. For years ago I conducted respective tests and demonstrated, that repeated saving with the same "quality" does not introduce image deterrioration; others did the same tests and came to the same result.
    Now, to be sure, I did it again, and the result contradicts my earlier findings. Although the deterrioration is after five consecutive savings practically irrecognizabe without hugely amplifying it, it is there, and that is an issue of principle.
    While it is possible, that I and others made some error in those tests, the question is (for me) what causes the difference.
    I verified, that the encoding parameters are unchanged. Thus the difference must come from the calculation required to transform between the original pixel values and the encoded values by
    a. the conversion between RGB and YCbCr,
    b. the discrete cosine transform (a variation of Furier transform).
    However, any differences resulting from the calculation (iteration, rounding) should be eliminated by the subsequent lossy step, the "quantization" (which is an euphemism for "throwing away most of the data"). Even if there is a difference between the first and second savings, there should not be any between the fourth and fifth savings - but there is.
    One explanation could be, that the encoding and decoding functions work with different precision, though this sounds very outlandish.
    Anyway, darn.
    Re the encoding parameters: they *have to be* stored in the JPEG file, otherwise the data could not be decoded, except by that program, which knows the parameters. However, JPEG is not designed for human consumption but for computers (this fact makes testing a program, which reads or writes JPEG data a serious PITA). The metadata can be analyzed only by a hex editor, and one has to know the structure of that data.
    Re knowing, if the file has to be compressed or not: JPEG is *always* encoded. There are different variants of the encoding method, but there is no "unencoded" version.

  • Batch Saving jpg from Camera Raw PSE 6 for Mac

    I'm running PSE 6 for Mac.  I'm shooting in RAW to retain all  data from sensor.  My work flow is straight forward.
    Review photos on CF card and do initial throw away of bad photos. 
    Download from CF card to Backup drive to preserve original photos. 
    I upload photos to Bridge, keyword, grade, and copywrite, etc. then open in Camera Raw and process as necessary; exposure, recovery, sharpen, fill-in, crop, fill-in etc.
    Select all and do a save (default is .png) to save my changes.  Since Camera Raw will not save to jpg format I open in PSE6
    My workflow can change here depending on what my end product will be but usually I'll send some photos out to share which is the subject of another post.  I can't make the program resize more than one photo for email even though I have all of the photos I want to email selected in the film strip.
    Anyway my process for batch saving to jpg is as follows:
    Select all of the photos (I will select only those that have been cropped to the same size such as 4x6) in the film strip.
    Open File > Process Multiple Files
    Fill out the dialogue box (see attachment) and press OK
    The next thing that happens completely negates the automated process, I get the Save As Dialogue box for every photo (see attached)
    I delete the "copy" text and save
       6.  Some of the photos turn out black under preview in finder
       7.  When I try to reopen the jpg in PSE6 I get an error message (see attachment)
    Any help is appreciated.

    love2kruz wrote:
    I'm running PSE 6 for Mac.  I'm shooting in RAW to retain all  data from sensor.  My work flow is straight forward.
    Review photos on CF card
    Stop right there!  That's a very bad idea.   You should not be viewing images that are still on the card.  Download them to your local hard drive first.  Otherwise you run the risk of the software writing to the card and destroying the format.
    This excerpt is from a long-gone post by author Bruce Fraser:
    Bruce Fraser - 4:17pm Jun 14, 04 PST (#5 of 21)
    Opening files directly from the camera is a bad idea for a variety of reasons*, and it most certainly isn't faster than using a FireWire or USB2 card reader.
             • Drains the camera battery
             • Runs the risk of the software you're using to open the images writing to the card and destroying the format
             • Runs a small but significant risk of USB power frying the camera
             • Slowest method known to mankind of getting images off a CF or SD card

  • Error opening images in PSE from Camera RAW

    After opening RAW images in Camera Raw and clicking 'Open images' I often receive an error "Could not process request due to program error." On a second, third try I am usually able to open the images.
    Raw images are from Nikon D5100, Camera RAW version 8.3,
    Adobe Photoshop Elements Version: 12.0 (12.0 (20130925.r.43436)) x32
    Operating System: Windows 7 64-bit

    I think others have reported that the size limits that apply to PSE 5 and 6:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402760.html
    also affected their PSE 7 and 8.  If those limits don't apply, it would be good to know authoritatively.

  • Duller colors from Camera Raw to Photoshop: why?

    Hello!
    I'm opening my Canon 70D RAW files with Camera Raw 8.4.1. After this step, I open the corrected file in Photoshop CC. At this point colors have changed, everything is duller and less contrasted.
    See image.
    Camera Raw color management: Adobe RGB, 16Bit.
    Photoshop color management: RGB: Adobe RGB (prepress Europe 3)
    Also, no color proofing is active.
    How can I correct this issue?

    This is a problem with your display profile. The conversion from source profile to display profile is not the same in these two cases, so a bad display profile can show up this way.
    ACR converts from its internal working space, linear ProPhoto. Adobe RGB is just the export color space here, so irrelevant. Photoshop OTOH converts from Adobe RGB.
    Recalibrate, and examine your calibrator's settings. V4 profiles and LUT-based profiles have caused problems for some, so try v2 and matrix-based if you have these options. You can also test by substituting a known good profile, which would be sRGB for a standard display, or Adobe RGB for a wide gamut one.

  • 16 bit/14bit nefs opening in P/S from camera raw 5.2 as 8 bit images

    I am downloading 16 bit nefs (D300) from card reader with cs4 bridge. In bridge I can check the meta data and see that they are 16bit but when I open in camera raw 5.2 then do the open file in photoshop form there they open as 8bit files instead of 16bit as I expected. I tryed the convert to dng on the import and get same 8bit results. I am using windows xp pro. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? I have slow dial up here so do not have my work photoshop computer hooked to net for help files from bridge and photoshop. Also have Shewes new real world camera raw and his deal with Martin Eweing preordered from amazon but don't know when they will come.

    >I'm having trouble understanding the jargon though. Are you saying that the sensor data is read more slowly in 14-bit, which reduces the noise floor? and that is is only of any benefit when used at the lowest noise ISO (ie 200)?
    Yeah that is basically the idea. A different read-out path or set of amplifiers is used or it is simply "read slower" which can, in principle, reduce noise. Not something that is inherent to 14 vs 12 bits but more to the way the data is read. If the noise stayed the same and it is in the lower 2 bits of the 12 bits converter, there is no point as the only thing you're doing is more precisely imaging the noise. If however, the noise goes down a little going to the 14-bit readout method, you might get better signal to noise ratios and hence more shadow detail. This is all theory, and if you actually do the test with your camera, you'll see there is no difference in real world photos. The shadows would need to be really deep to see any of this. Basically you need to be boosting exposure by 3 or 4 stops AND applying shadow fill near 100. Not a realistic situation. To see it, you indeed need to be at a situation where the noise floor is significantly low, which means low ISOs on most cameras. At high ISO, there could be a difference because of differences in amplifiers, etc, but in practice that is not the case either on this camera. Other sources of noise drown it out completely.
    >Is there no other benefit to post-processing? I'm not clear where the extra 2 bits go; is it increased resolution over the same dynamic range, or is the dynamic range extended? Is this not also a factor in choosing 14 over 12?
    There could be some benefit if the noise characteristics were significantly different. Lower noise means higher dynamic range and therefore better capability to extract detail from shadow areas. However, from my testing, in practice this does not happen on the D300. Other cameras might well show higher dynamic range and better detail in shadows at 14 bits. You can see some of this by looking at the dynamic Range charts on DxOmark.com where sensors of different cameras are tested. You need to be significantly above 11 to 12 EV for 14 bit capture to make a difference.
    >Sorry if this is a bit off-topic, but you have to grab experts when you find some
    The easiest thing is to test it. In realistic scenarios, I just cannot see any difference. If you contrive a completely weird case, such as underexposing an entire image by 8 stops, or pushing up shadows by as many stops, you can get into the range where it might make a difference. Those are just not real situations though.

  • How do I move a picture from camera raw to photoshop?  When I click open image I get a checker board

    How do I move a picture from editing in camera raw to photoshop?  When I click "open image" I get a checker board in photochop

    Sindbad. A suggestion, to let us know all the specifics of your machine: go the the help menu, and select System Info...
    Copy the contents, and paste it in an answer there.
    You might want to remove your serial number.
    Thanks to that we will know: the exact version of Photoshop, your memory, where Photoshop is installed, the graphic card and its drivers, and also if you are using third party plug-ins.
    Some other users reported that when launching Photoshop holding down the shift key (this disables the plug-ins), he was able to see the images.
    The solution in that case is to search for updated plug-ins (or to report the plug-in manufacturers that their plug-ins causes issues in Photoshop.

Maybe you are looking for