Saving in 300 DPI?

Hi there! Wondering if anyone has an answer to my frustrating question.
I do commerical graphics for many clients, and I usually start off with a new canvas of 1200x1200 px in 300 DPI..however, when I export or save for web & devices, the resolution changes usually to 150 or sometimes even to 72 DPI wether I'm saving in JPEG or PNG. I need these graphics in 300 dpi..
I'm guessing it has something to do with compression settings, but I'm just not sure. This is a very big problem for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.
(I'm using CS4)
TIA,
~Jess

Jess,
...I usually start off with a new canvas of 1200x1200 px in 300 DPI...
No, I'm sorry, but you don't. Not in Illustrator. This statement reveals the basic misunderstanding you are stumbling over.
There is no "canvas" in Illustrator in the sense of a program like Photoshop, in which you open a "blank" document of a certain number of pixels, with each pixel just initially being white.
There are no pixels when you create a new Illustrator document. There is just a literally empty document. No pixels, no nothing. It contains no pixels at all, even if you have the rulers set to its ridiculous selection of "pixels." (You'll know why this is ridiculous in a few minutes.)
An Illustrator file contains objects, not pixels. Those objects can be of several different types. One type of object an Illustrator file can contain is a raster image, and raster images, of course, contain pixels. But until there is a raster image on the page, there are no pixels at all. And even when there is a raster image on the page, its scale (PPI) has absolutely nothing to do with the "pixels" of the page rulers.
When you export an Illustrator file as a single raster image--using either the Export dialog or the Save For Web & Devices dialog--that's when you create pixels. In fact, if there are already any pixels on the page (in raster images), those pixels are going to be resampled to new pixels to become part of the one big raster image you export.
Consider: Each raster object on the page in Illustrator is independent. Each one can have a different scale (PPI). So even if your document sizes is ridiculously called "1200 pixels x 1200 pixels", it is not. Consider this example and then tell me how it could be:
Suppose you have drawn a 4" x 4" rectangle on the empty page. You have then rasterized the rectangle at 300 ppi. Clearly, the raster image now contains 1200 x 1200 pixels. But the page rulers say it measures 288 pixels on a side. How can that be? Read on.
so a 1200 x 1200 pixel document at 300 ppi is 4 inches x 4 inches.
In Illustrator, this is absolutely not true. A 1200 x 1200 "pixel" document in Illustrator is certainly not 4 inches by 4 inches. It is 16.666 x 16.666 inches. This is because of one simple fact: The "pixels" referred to by Illustrator in its Document Setup dialog and in its rulers are not pixels at all. They are points (1/72 inch).
If you don't believe that, do this simple exercise:
Create a new document in your customary way, 1200 x 1200 with Pixels as the unit. Now stop here for just a moment, and look in that document setup dialog for where you tell Illustrator what PPI you want the 1200 x 1200 document to be. Can't find it. It's not there. There is no PPI in an Illustrator document, so you cannot say a 1200 x 1200 pixel Illustrator document is 300 ppi. (If it's anything, it's 72 ppi, but even that is skewed logic.)
Now rightClick the ruler and change the unit to inches. How big is the document?
Look at the 1" mark on the ruler. Change the ruler back to Pixels. How many "pixels" are converted to an inch? Keep doing this. Use any trick you can find in Illustrator to make its rulers convert an inch to anything other than 72 "pixels."
Now answer this: How big is a pixel?
You can't answer that question because a pixel can be any size you want it to be. It's like asking 'how big is a space?' The very fact that you can scale an image to any ppi you want (make it 1200 ppi or 12 ppi, without adding or destroying any pixels) prooves that a pixel has no fixed measure. And that's why it's ridiculous for a program like Illustrator to use "pixels" as an absolute distance measure in its rulers the same way it used inches or centimeters. It's pure nonsense.
If a pixel has no fixed measure, then how in the world can you use it as a unit of measure on a ruler? You can't; not legitimately, not in the sense of measuring dimensions of objects or pages. (Remember? Illustrator handles objects. Illustrator's rulers tell you the size of the objects.) Anywhere on that page, there may be a 1200 x 1200 pixel raster image, somehow occupying 72 "pixels" or 3000 "pixels" or 150 "pixels" of your page. Used as it is in Illustrator's rulers, "pixels" is nonsense.
Illustrator's "pixel" rulers are a complete sham. You can put a 1200 x 1200 pixel image on an Illustrator page and make it "measure" any number of sham "pixels" according to Illusrator's rulers you want. Therein lies the answer to your question:
Forget about Illustrator's rulers as being a count of pixels. It is not. It's a measure of 1/72" units (in other words, points). Do not think of the sham "pixels" on the ruler as being pixels. Think of them as being what they are: points. Then your confusion will begin to clear.
Better yet, don't use sham "pixels" as your ruler units at all. You want a 1200 x 1200 pixel raster image exported from Illustrator at a scale of 300 ppi, right?
You've been told you can't do that using the Save For Web & Devices dialog. If you've read and understood the above, you should now know that is not true. You would of course use the Export dialog to create a raster image that embeds a scale factor other than 72 PPI in the image file, because the Save for Web & Devices dialog assumes a browser which ignores the scale factor embedded in a raster image file. But for the sake of understanding, let's use Save For Web & Devices anyway:
Forget about Illustrator's sham rulers. Create your document the size you know you want it to be: 4 inches x 4 inches.
Create your artwork on the page. You can use raster images, text objects, vector objects, or any combination of those.
Now you want a 300 PPI raster export of your whole 4" x 4" page. Third grade math tells us that will require 1200 x 1200 pixels.
File>Save For Web & Devices. The Save for Web & Devices dialog opens. Select the raster file type you want, either JPEG or PNG. Go to the Image Size tab. What do you see? Original Size and settings for New Size. Original Size is 288 x 288 pixels (See? Illustrator unyieldingly considers a pixel on its rulers to mean 1/72 inch). But you can enter 1200 x 1200 (or any other desired pixel count). Click Apply.
Save. Select Images Only.
Launch InDesign. Import the image. Note the size. (Does 16.666 ring a bell?) In the Scale X Percentage field, key "4 in". (That's right, key an absolute value into the percentage field.)
You now have a 1200 x 1200, 300ppi image. You did it using the Save For Web & Devices dialog. And you didn't even use Illustrator's ridiculous "pixel" rulers.
JET

Similar Messages

  • Saving to 300 dpi but when I reopen it is back to 240 dpi

    I am doing this in image size but the changes are not staying when I reopen.  What am I doing wrong?
    Thank you
    Melissa

    Hi Melissa.
    In the beginning, there are pixels. Period. Not pixels per anything. The number of pixels you start with is determined by your camera. If my camera sensor array is 3000 pixels by 2000 pixels, it is a 6 megapixel camera. The resolution, or pixels per inch, is an arbitrary assignment of those pixels when rendered.
    Doing simple math, our 6 mp image will display at 41.66 inches by 27.77 inches on a 72 ppi computer image screen. If you assign it 300 ppi for printing, it will size out at 10x6.66 inches. But the point is, image size is a mathematical calculation base strictly on the number of pixels and the assigned ppi. Assuming you have unchecked Resample Image, which is highly recommended. In general, you don't want to resample your image. You don't want to create new pixels or throw away pixels, which is what resampling does. Unless your printer has indicated otherwise, 300 ppi is a suitable output resolution for most print work.
    This is where dpi or dots per inch comes in. It is a printer specification. The printer will convert the ppi to dpi, according to its own logic. And as Kurt said, this is highly variable. But the 300 ppi rule of thumb is based on the way this conversion is made. 300 ppi converts gracefully from ppi to dpi for most print situations. This would include your clients printing from the CD to their own home printer.
    Surprisingly, many pro printers aren't clear about the relationship between total pixels, ppi, and dpi. They aren't photographers. So they ask for a print specification, dpi. Not realizing all you can specify is the ppi.
    Below, Resample Image is unchecked, as recommended. Changes made in the Document Size box will not change anything in the Pixel Dimensions box. This is good. Any changes made in the Document Size box does not change pixels. It assigns them a dimension. Changes made here will not change the way the image appears at Actual Pixels on your screen, because they are displayed at screen resolution (usually 72 or 96) no matter what ppi you have assigned. Changes in the Document Size box are nothing more than a set of calculations, and have no effect on the image at all. Until it it printed. Then the printer will take these calculations use them to do it's own, converting the assigned ppi to its native dpi.  Or something like that. 
    You are not the first one to be confused by this. And may be more confused after my explanation. But there's tons of info about this on the web. Some of it makes sense. Good luck.
    Peace,
    Lee

  • Saving bufferedimage as 300 DPI tiff

    Hi !
    I have a tiff image (300 dpi) which i read process (rotate, scale, apply icc profile ...) And when I save it (see below) it ends up in a 72dpi image ... I have browsed the forum and I see lots of people have problems with this issue, but I didn't find any answer :(
    Please help if you can :)
    Regards
    How I Write The Image
    OutputStream out = new SeekableOutputStream(new RandomAccessFile(Destination,"rw"));
    TIFFEncodeParam param3 = new TIFFEncodeParam();
    param3.setCompression(TIFFEncodeParam.COMPRESSION_DEFLATE);
    ImageEncoder encoder = ImageCodec.createImageEncoder("TIFF", out, param3);
    encoder.encode(GeneratedImage);
    out.close();

    public class ris{
    public static void main(String args[]) throws IOException{
    final int XRES_TAG = 100;
    final int YRES_TAG = 100;
    int[] resolution = { 150, 1};
    String input = "C:/a/01.tiff";
    String output = "C:/a/nuovo.tiff";
    RenderedOp image1 = JAI.create("fileload", input);
    TIFFField xRes = new TIFFField(XRES_TAG, TIFFField.TIFF_RATIONAL, 1, new int[][] { resolution });
    TIFFField yRes = new TIFFField(YRES_TAG, TIFFField.TIFF_RATIONAL, 1, new int[][] { resolution });
    TIFFEncodeParam tep = new TIFFEncodeParam();
    tep.setExtraFields(new TIFFField[] { xRes, yRes});
    OutputStream out = new SeekableOutputStream(new RandomAccessFile(output,"rw"));
    tep.setCompression(TIFFEncodeParam.COMPRESSION_DEFLATE);
    ImageEncoder encoder = ImageCodec.createImageEncoder("TIFF", out, tep);
    encoder.encode(image1);
    out.close();
    i wrote the same codebut it throws this exception
    java.lang.ClassCastException
    at com.sun.media.jai.codec.TIFFField.getAsRationals(TIFFField.java:267)
    at com.sun.media.jai.codecimpl.TIFFImageEncoder.writeValues(TIFFImageEncoder.java:1804)
    at com.sun.media.jai.codecimpl.TIFFImageEncoder.writeDirectory(TIFFImageEncoder.java:1608)
    at com.sun.media.jai.codecimpl.TIFFImageEncoder.encode(TIFFImageEncoder.java:1436)
    at com.sun.media.jai.codecimpl.TIFFImageEncoder.encode(TIFFImageEncoder.java:161)
    at Image.immagini.ris.main(ris.java:35)
    Exception in thread "main"
    What could it be?

  • How do I create a 300 dpi PDF from a Word 2003 file?

    I need to convert a Word (2003) file to a High-res PDF file for the printers. They have requested 300 dpi.
    I have Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro (trial version).
    The file contains a number of pictures in jpg format. Most of these are pretty high resolution. The document printed in Word on a laser printer looks fine.
    I did try saving the file a a PDF file, and that did work, however it was low resolution. There must be some settings I have to change. How do I set things so it will creat a high resolution PDF file?

    There is no such thing as resolution of a PDF file. Text and vectors in PDF are preserved and get scaled depending on the device on which PDF is shown.
    Images in PDF do have a resolution that you can set when creating PDF. When printing your file from Word:
    After File>Print, select printer properties.
    In "ADobe PDF Settings" tab, you will see "Default Settings" - click the Edit button next to it.
    In the Images pane, select your desired resolution.

  • Save PDF to Folder as Jpeg/300 dpi

    Question about exporting custom book design into Jpegs/300 dpi. I do it, it seems to be working and then once it stops I can't find the file with the jpegs of the book design. Not sure if it's saving and if it is where it's saving to? I went into automator (which I know nothing about) and when I run the 'save PDF to folder as jpeg" action, I get an error message. Help! Thanks in advance!

    Installing Aperture again will not affect your library, so there is no risk doing that.
    Regards
    Paul K

  • Copy a 300 dpi photo onto a 100 dpi background

    I'm creating a collage of photos (mockup, right now). The background on which those photos will be added as layers is at 100 dpi.
    When I copy a 300 dpi photo that shows up on my screen at 100%, and paste it on the background (also viewed at 100%) — I would expect the 300 dpi pasted photo to render on the 100 dpi background at a 300% ENLARGEMENT... But it shows up at the same size it was rendered in it's own window... That doesn't make sense to me...  Am I suppose to first lower the resolution of the 300 dpi photo to 100 while enlarging it's physical size 3 times?
    I must be missing something here...
    Thanks...

    Video Demo http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/Populate911_720p.mp4
    Photo Collage Toolkit UPDATED Added PCTpreferences.jsx Customize defaults and add your own Layer Styles in here.
    Photoshop scripting is powerful and I believe this package demonstrates this.
    The package includes four simple rules to follow when making Photo Collage Template PSD files so they will be compatible with my Photoshop scripts.
    There are twelve scripts in this package they provide the following functions:
    Documentation and Examples
    Download
    Optional templates 8.5x11 - 16MB
    Optional templates 8x10 - 51KB
    Optional templates 11x14 - 23MB
    Optional templates 12x12 - 12MB
    Optional templates 13x19 - 37MB
    Optional templates 16x16 - 4MB
    Optional templates 16x20 - 91MB
    Optional templates 20x24 - 125KB
    Optional templates Multi-Image - 113MB
    Optional templates One-Image - 106MB
    Optional templates PhotoBoard-11x14 - 231KB
    TestCollageTemplate.jsx - Used to test a Photo Collage Template while you are making it with Photoshop.
    CollageTemplateBuilder.jsx - Can build Templates compatible with this toolkit's scripts.
    LayerToAlphaChan.jsx - Used to convert a Prototype Image Layer stack into a template document.
    InteractivePopulateCollage.jsx - Used to interactively populate Any Photo Collage template. Offers most user control inserting pictures and text.
    ReplaceCollageImage.jsx - use to replace a populated collage image Smart Object layer with an other image correctly resized and positioned.
    ChangeTextSize.jsx - This script can be used to change Image stamps text size when the size used by the populating did not work well.
    PopulateCollageTemplate.jsx - Used to Automatically populate a Photo Collage template and leave the populated copy open in Photoshop.
    BatchOneImageCollage.jsx - Used to Automatically Batch Populate Collage templates that only have one image inserted. The Collage or Image may be stamped with text.
    BatchMultiImageCollage.jsx - Used to Automatically Batch Populate Any Photo Collage template with images in a source image folder. Easier to use than the interactive script. Saved collages can be tweaked.
    BatchPicturePackage.jsx - Used to Automatically Batch Populate Any Photo Collage template with an image in a source image folder
    PasteImageRoll.jsx - Paste Images into a document to be print on roll paper.
    PCTpreferences.jsx - Edit This File to Customize Collage Populating scripts default setting and add your own Layer styles.
    With easy to create templates Collages are easy to Make

  • Photoshop document changes to 72 dpi from 300 dpi when receiver opens it.

    I created an ad for the newspaper at 300 dpi. I emailed it and received a call it was at a low res of 72. I know I created it and saved it properly. I researched and found I should uncheck the resampling box when saving the document. I did that and resent, same issue.
    I have recreated the ad over 20 times and sent it all with the same issue. I just hung up from Adobe after spending over an hour on the phone with them, having them take over my computer, e-mail it himself after creating his own 300 dpi document and the same result. Basically, Adobe is telling me it isn't their problem, it is my server. I sent it from Yahoo and Microsoft and still 72. Even sending as Tif, 72 dpi.
    I am at a loss. I don't know what else to try and this ad needs to be in the newspaper in 2 days.
    Does anyone have a suggestion? I'm desperate.
    Thanks,
    Mary

    It is very usual for many applications (such as the receiving party must have) to open JPEGs at 72 ppi by default but without resampling, i.e. maintaining the exact number of pixels, so many pixel wide by so many pixels high.
    It is then a trivial matter for the recipient to change it back to 300 ppi without resampling to go back  to your original.
    Incidentally, it's ppi not dpi. 
    The fact that you say the resolution and the size (pixel dimensions, or so many pixels wide by so many pixels high) does change makes me suspect that you may be using Apple's "Mail" program to email your files.  Mail is notorious and (in)famous for reducing the size of your attachments at will if it deems it appropriate or necessary, as in "nobody in his right mind would want a JPEG that big!"  Grrrrrr…
    Ideally, you should switch to a decent email program.  I use MS Entourage, part of MS Office.
    The workaround is to archive or "zip" your image files before attaching them to Apple's Mail, so that you end up with an archived or zipped file that Mail can't touch, as it won't even know it's an image file.
    If you are not using Mail, you'll have to continue troubleshooting.

  • Why did I get 72 dpi solutions in AI CS5 instead of 300 dpi in Photoshop CS5!

    Dear all!
    I have done my file in Photoshop with 300 dpi. I have finished it and then saved it as EPS because I would like to open it in my AI CS5.
    So I go to File>Open the EPS File in AI CS5. I get it with 72 dpi file in AI CS5 when I check the resolution in Effect>Documents Raster Effects Settings. Why did I get 72 dpi file in AI CS5 instead of the original file which is really 300 dpi in Photoshop?
    Will it change the quality if I change from 72 dpi to 300 dpi as I wish to in the Documents Raster Effects Settings?
    Please help to explain in details if possible.
    Thanks a lot and best wishes.
    I am looking forward to hearing from you.
    My best regards,
    LUCK

    Luck,
    To see the use the raster image in its right size along with other objects, scale it (down) to match. To go from 72 to 300 PPI you need a factor of 0.24 (proportionally), you may use multiplication by 0.24 in the Transform panel or Object>Transform>Scale with 24% .
    It means I must change resolutions in Document Raster Effects Settings if I have effects raster effects created within Illustrator. Is it right?
    If (and only) if you wish to have the effects at the same resolution as (one of) the raster image(s). This will depend of the actual effect, but for many effects, yes (you will have to choose one resolution if the document contains more than one).
    Illy always sees raster images at 72 PPI, unless she is told otherwise.

  • How to save Photos in 300 DPI

    Hi,
    I am submitting photos to be included in my new book, and the publisher wants 300 DPI.
    When checking my photos, they are saved to 72 and I cant find a way to save them in the
    300 format. Ideas?
    Thanks
    Bella

    DPI - Dots Per Inch - is meaningless for digital photos until you print them. Then to have a 300 dpi photo you need 300 dots (pixels) per inch of printed photo - so a photo to be printed at 1" x 1" needs to be 300 pixels x 300 pixels - one to be printed at 4" x 6" needs to be 1200 pixels x 1800 pixels -- once to be printed at 20" x 30" needs to be 6000 pixels x 9000 pixels.
    See The Myth of DPI for additional information.
    LN

  • Greyscale jpegs at 300 dpi

    Hi -
    I have just changed from using Photoshop CS3 on a PC to CS5 on a Mac.  Most of my work is deisgn in Quark Xpress 7 -- using Photoshop as my image editor.
    I have tried doing some work today on a greyscale newsletter design.  I started this work on my old PC and am completing it on my new Mac.  The photos I had already edited and saved as jpegs in CS3 on the PC show up fine in Quark at 300 dpi, but the photos I have edited today in CS5, converting to greyscale and cropping to 300 ppi will only show up in Quark as 72dpi.  If I convert them to CMYK Quark will recognise them as 300dpi.If I save them as PSD files in grey they will show up as 300dpi, just not as jpegs (which I'd prefer) and bizarely when saved as TIFFs are recognised as 260dpi!
    At first I thought this was a Quark problem, but it doesn't look that way as the greyscale images from CS3 are working fine.
    Is there some setting in CS5 about the way jpegs are written in greyscale that I am missing?
    Any help gratefully received.
    Thanks,
    Greg Smith

    Marian Driscoll schrieb:
    It is fairly equal with 2002's InDesign 2.0 in regard to PSD and PDF support.
    InDesign has extended it's PSD, PDF/PDP an AI support since then. 9 years! We live in 2011!
    Do you know InDesign? Quark cannot export PDFs with live transparency up to today. This was possible since InDesign 2.0.
    Same color management capabilites? None of them?
    Layer Compss from Photoshop?
    Direct support of AI files? (AI files contain a full pdf if compatible to pdf seaved.)
    Fully supported RGB workflows as InDesign does?
    Or do you really compare Quark's typography to InDesign's? Nested styles? Inline styles? GREP styles? Language tagged to the character, not to the paragraph or like Quark does to the whole document? Language based apostrophes?
    Are you sure you want to compare? I am aware on Quark and I am aware that PDFs created from Quark are not the same as PDFs exported from InDesign. I have both applications on my computer. Do guess with which application I create only my stuff? InDesign, because I know both applications.
    And if you want to compare Quark 9 to InDesign, then you should not tocompare it to version 2.0 which is now 9 years old, you should compare it to a future version of InDesign which will be available at that time. No one knows which functionality this InDesign version will have because no one knows when Quark 9 will be available. And neither no one knows what Quark 9 will can. Even if it would be announced now, Quark never fulfilled it's promises in the past to any future version.
    Quark has never been able to solve problems in the past. Outside of the US is Quark way too expensive. (Sure InDesign costs much more here in Germany too.) Quark single version costs about 1.340,– Euro, InDesign 1.010,– EUR inclusive tax, or 1.126,– versus 849,– exclusive Tax (1.500 USD without tax versus 1.135,– USD). Quark has become much cheaper since InDesign hit the market here. But if you buy an Quark update you cannot be sure that the delivered serial will work. With the previous version it took me 4 months to get a working serial. Everyday phone to Quarks support. Expensive phone numbers outside Europe, because they are in Switzerland. (CH is not part of the European Union.) Virtually no one here in Germany buys Quark to create new art with it. It was only bought to use old files newer computers or because some partners deliver files which have to be opened. Have you ever tried to contact Quark's support? Maybe that you get one on the phone, but you will never get help.

  • Processing images as 300 dpi jpegs, comes out at 72 dpi.

    I've seen two other posts with the same problem with no answer, so I thought I try as well. I am using Ap 2.1. I've processed the images in both the preset jpeg original size with the edit to 300 dpi. I've also made a custom preset with 300 dpi jpegs. Both times the images open in PS at 72 dpi. I processed them as tiffs at 300 dpi and they open in PS at 300 dpi just fine.
    I've tripled checked the file-export-versions-JPEG original size-edit-300dpi.
    any ideas what's up?

    J,
    I am repeating a post I made in another topic about this issue -- I would appreciate your thoughts:
    I conducted a test that may or may not tell us something, but: I had a project with an imported photo scanned at 600 dpi and saved as a .psd at the time of the scan, before importing into Aperture. If I export that photo as a .psd, then PS will open it with a dpi of 72, but GC will open it with a dpi of 600. However, if I export that photo as a .tif, then both PS and GC open and report it to be 72 dpi?
    I am not sure, but I think this is an indictment of Aperture?
    Please tell me about the possible impact at any printers you use, since if the print size is specified, and not pixels have been lost, the image will print as you intend? I have some reports this has been seen with iPhoto, but ultimately not an issue, but I have not research with any printers.
    Ernie

  • 300 dpi pictures

    When I open my photographs in Fireworks, they open in 72 dpi.
    After I modify them, I need to save them at 300 dpi. (I do not have
    Photoshop which will of course open the photos in 300 dpi if
    asked.)
    1) Do I lose quality when converting/resampling the photos to
    300 dpi in Fireworks and then saving?
    2) I know of two ways of converting to 300 dpi. One, I go to
    the Modify -> Canvas -> Image size and change it to 300 dpi.
    Two, I can open a 300 dpi window, paste the present image, and when
    asked say resample.
    Is one of these methods better than the other?
    3) Is Photoshop better at obtaining and preserving a quality
    300 dpi photo. Or can I stay with Fireworks (a program of which I
    am very fond)?
    Thanks!

    1)As long as you do not resample the image, the only quality
    loss is
    from resaving the jpeg file. Unless you are planning to print
    the
    images, changing the dpi has no effect anyway, so you may not
    need to
    alter it.
    2)Either will do the job, but the first one is faster. Just
    don't
    resample the image.
    3) Again, the concept of dpi is only relevant when printing.
    Changing
    dpi does not change the image file quality in any way, so
    long as the
    file is not resampled. DPI does affect print quality and
    print
    (reproduction) size.
    HTH
    Jim Babbage - .:Community MX:. & .:Adobe Community
    Expert:.
    Extending Knowledge, Daily
    http://www.communityMX.com/
    CommunityMX - Free Resources:
    http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
    .:Adobe Community Expert for Fireworks:.
    news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.fireworks
    news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver
    TresTria wrote:
    > When I open my photographs in Fireworks, they open in 72
    dpi. After I modify
    > them, I need to save them at 300 dpi. (I do not have
    Photoshop which will of
    > course open the photos in 300 dpi if asked.)
    >
    > 1) Do I lose quality when converting/resampling the
    photos to 300 dpi in
    > Fireworks and then saving?
    >
    > 2) I know of two ways of converting to 300 dpi. One, I
    go to the Modify ->
    > Canvas -> Image size and change it to 300 dpi. Two, I
    can open a 300 dpi
    > window, paste the present image, and when asked say
    resample.
    >
    > Is one of these methods better than the other?
    >
    > 3) Is Photoshop better at obtaining and preserving a
    quality 300 dpi photo. Or
    > can I stay with Fireworks (a program of which I am very
    fond)?
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    >
    >

  • Save 300 dpi jpegs

    I have a tiff file of a painting I scanned at 300 dpi. It's original image size when I open it is photoshop is 57.8 MB, 18" W by 12.477" H, Res 300. I need to resize it and send it as a 300 dpi jpeg. I have started in the image size dialogue box and just change the W to 11.25. That automatically changes the H to 7.798 and the res still says 300. The file size reduces to 22.6 MB. I click ok and then go to save as and choose jpeg. In the jpeg box I chose 12 Max and baseline standard and click ok. The saved file is reduced to 8.5 MB. When I open it in photoshop, it opens at 300 dpi when I look in the image size box. However, when I send it to someone else and they open it, the file is only 72 dpi. What am I missing to get the file to save at 11.25 inches, jpeg, but remain 300 dpi?
    Thank you.
    Sheilaartist

    I have a tiff file of a painting I scanned at 300 dpi. It's original image size when I open it is photoshop is 57.8 MB, 18" W by 12.477" H, Res 300.
    That means you image is 18x300=5400px wide and 12.477x300=3743px high  widthxheight=numbed of pixel 3 bytes per pixel for 8bit color 5400x3743x3=60,636,600 which is close to Photoshop 57.8MB estimate or the Tiff file is 57,8MB.
    I need to resize it and send it as a 300 dpi jpeg.
    Then all you have to do is resize the open document and save a jpeg file.
    I have started in the image size dialogue box and just change the W to 11.25. That automatically changes the H to 7.798 and the res still says 300.
    That means you also have RESAMPLE and Constrain checked in the Image Size dialog bottom control section and some interpolation method is set. Photoshop will reduce the number of pixels you have for the image. When you click on OK Photoshop will generate a new image that is  11.25x300=3375px wide and 7.798x300=2339px high
    The file size reduces to 22.6 MB.
    The file is not changed when you use Image Size.  The Tiff file remains as it was before it was opened. Photoshop is a document editor not a file editor.
    I click ok and then go to save as and choose jpeg.
    When you use "Save as" and use the pull-down menu and select Jpeg you will be saving a new file and not be over writing the tiff file.
    In the jpeg box I chose 12 Max
    That is a quality setting the higher the number (Max 12) the better the file quality will be the file will be less compressed then when lower quality setting are used.  You would be hard pressed to see any image quality difference between quality 10 file and quality 12 file.  The quality 10 file size will be quite a bit smaller then a quality 12 jpeg file.
    and baseline standard and click ok. The saved file is reduced to 8.5 MB.
    The new jpeg file size is a product of the jpeg quality setting and how well the image data compresses.  Size can vary all over the place.  Images with lots of fine details will be larger then images with little detail.  An image of a white wall will compress much smaller the an image with the same number of pixels that has a lot of details like an image of a cross word puzzle.
    When I open it in photoshop, it opens at 300 dpi when I look in the image size box.
    Correct you did not change the resolution when you resampled the image.
    However, when I send it to someone else and they open it, the file is only 72 dpi. What am I missing to get the file to save at 11.25 inches, jpeg, but remain 300 dpi?
    If when they open the file the receive they see an  image that has a 72dpi resolution. It means either what you used to send the file resized the the image and sent a different file or what was used to receive the file resized the image and saved a different file. Or the image was resized by the image processor the user used to open the file either during open or after it was opened.  For example if the user received the file you saved and sent 3375px wide and 2339px high and 300DPI and opened it in Photoshop and Photoshop is set to open Jpeg images through ARC the users ACR default workflow setting could be set to open image at 72DPI.  An image dpi is a setting the image may still be 3375px wide and 2339px high however set to 72 DPI the print size would be 3375px/72=46.875"  wide and 2339px/72=32.486" high  using Image size changing itr 72dpi print resolution to 300dpi with RESAMPLE NOT CHECK would return it size to 11.25" x 7.798" at 300DPI.

  • How do I take 300 dpi photos with my iPhone 4s? And how do I export them to my MacBook Pro at 300 dpi to use as I want to print photos.

    How do I take 300 dpi photos with my iPhone 4s?
    And how do I export them to my MacBook Pro at 300 dpi to use as I want to print photos.
    I have been using the standard camera on the iPhone and require 300 dpi to create photo books as the photos are resized according the layout.
    Your time and assistance in appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks Tonefox!
    After looking at a few of the links I found a mathematical equation that assisted me.
    Inches = Pixels/DPI
    eg: 3 inches = 300 pixels/100 DPI
    Using this equation and the fact that iPhone 4s takes photos that are 3264 x 2448 I was able to work out the largest print I could make with 300 DPI.
    Width 3264 pix/ 300 DPI = 10.88 inches
    Height 2448 pix/ 300 DPI = 8.16 inches
    Therefore, the largest print (with 300DPI) I can make of these photos is 10.88 inches x 8.16 inches.
    Which is great!
    So is it critical for me to change the dpi in say photoshop or does it not matter as long as I don't go above the 10.88 inches x 8.16 inches?
    From what I can gather the smaller I resize the photo the higher the DPI and the bigger I stretch the photo the lower the DPI?
    Further clarification will be much appreciated. Thanks

  • How can I get 300 dpi tifs out of webex stills & then worked on in adobe illustrator?

    How can I get 300 dpi tifs out of webex stills & then worked on in adobe illustrator?
    I have been trying to convert images created in webex and transferred to illustrator into 300 dpi tifs. They download as ucf's when generated on white board. Or I have to upload files from other webex participants coming in at 72 dpi, converting them to something bigger in photoshop to paint in before taking them back into the webex session as a doc that then gets worked on further during the session. Later they go into illustrator for some more work with vectors. That's fine for the web but now a publisher wants them as 300 dpi tifs and I can only get things back & forth as 72 dpi pdf's. If I try to bump them up with a resample, they come out teensy weensy. What am I missing and is there any way to make them look good?

    What I need is to be able to transfer the images between formats without degradation of the resolution and find ways to sharpen what I have even if I can't increase pixels. If the original I'm delivered is a 96 dpi power point slide, for example, that's what I have to work with, I'm using Illustrator to compensate with vectors. But then I still need to get it back to a 300 dpi tiff to meet the specs.

Maybe you are looking for