Savings Plan Contribution is not getting processed in Payroll

Hello Friends,
We are in the process of upgrading our system from 4.0 to 4.7, After correcting the schema as per the release/OSS notes, we are getting Savings Plan Contribution as blank (Retirement Savings).
Cumulation values are coming thru right but current period contribution is missing.
Earlier we had P0169 with P61, now we do not see processing class(PCLS)61 in the PCLS list. Our earlier wage types were referring to PCLS 61, I am not sure if this is causing an issue.
Please let me know if you have any faced similar situation and have an answer.
Thanks & Best Regards
ravi

Ravi,
Appriciate if you could share the solution for your problem in savings plan contribution is not getting processed in the payroll. As I am facing the same kind od problem for my new configured benefit plan ROTH 401k plan.
Please let me know the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunita

Similar Messages

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Article IDoc not getting processed in PI for particle article type

Hello All,
I have an strange behaviour in my system.
i.e 1, we are creating an article IDOC by using BD10 for particulat article type.
2, IDOC created succesfully , then
3, Process the IDOC in BD87 to push the IDOC to PI system .
4, But i could not see the message in PI that too only for one article type.
I'm wondering why this is not getting processed only for one article type and not for others.
we also checked the basic filter for the message type in dist model and even i could not see any condition in PI also,
Is there any thing else i should check? can you please help us on this.
Regards , Sethu.

Hi,
Try to reimport the metadata of IDOC into PI in idx2. Also check the port definition in ECC and whether the segment is released or not. Please go through the below discussions it may help you.
EDISDEF: Port XXX segment defn E2EDK35 in IDoc type ORDERS05 CIM type
IDoc 0000000000181226 was saved but cannot or should not be sent
Regards,
Priyanka

Automatic update of number ranges in FBN1 is not getting processed

Automatic update of number ranges in FBN1 (current status) level is not getting processed.
Tried posting a customer payment document in the system though number ranges are maintained for the year 2015 the number ranges are not overlapped last year all documents are closed but still the numbers are not been picked automatically in FBN1 kindly help in this issue

Hello Rajesh
Please verify if number ranges are maintained correctly, verify same using transaction OBA7. Also ensure that external assignment is unchecked in FBN1. Share screenshots if possible.
Regards
Aniket

Bulky Message are not getting processed

Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded our XI systems to EHP4.
After upgrade Bulky files are not getting processed into XI system. Small files are getting processed successfully.
Earlier we had faced same issue at that time we have maintained some parameters in transaction RZ10, RZ11, SXMB_ADM-->
Integration Configuration--> HTTP time out parameter.
Same parameters are still there. But now the message is not getting processed in XI when we check into sxi_monitor. Message mapping is also not seems to be a problem as we havnt put any bulky logic over there.
The message is not getting processed ahead of Receiver Grouping . Please find attached log from Performanceheader
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134229.930472</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.052577</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.059576</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.07151</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.071518</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.239947</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.241179</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.250385</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134239.999045</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001292</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001413</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026156</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_SPLITTER_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026164</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
</SAP:PerformanceHeader>

Hi
Have you checked this thread, same discussion here
Performance of XI Interfaces
Also check this blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/08/xi-timeouts-timeouts-timeouts
Regards
Ramesh

Entry not getting processed

I have an Non recurrening Multiple Entries allowed element to an assignment which is not getting processed when i run payroll.
Please help
Thanks

This is to ensure that results generated by the future payroll runs are correct. Lets take a simple eg.
You have a pension element which would be 10% of Gross Pay_YTD.
Run Payroll for Jan (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 100 (10% of 1000).
Run Payroll for Mar (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 200 (10% of 2000).
Run Payroll for Feb (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 200 (10% of 2000 as _YTD of Feb does not account March figures).
In the above case the Payroll Run results generated by March would be incorrect.
So once you run Payroll for March, you can not run payroll for Feb. If you require any additional payments to be made in Feb (after Payroll for Feb and March are processed), you can run Retropay to bring forward the entries to next Open pay period.

IDOCS Error - Not getting processed automatically

Hi All,
We are loading hierarchy for a Product from R/3 system using the standard datasource.
When we execute the info package, IDOCs are not getting processed automatically.
We are facing the below error message.
Error when updating Idocs in Business Information Warehouse
Diagnosis
Errors have been reported in Business Information Warehouse during IDoc update:
No status record was passed to ALE by the applicat
System Response
Some IDocs have error status.
Procedure
Check the IDocs in Business Information Warehouse . You do this using the extraction monitor.
Error handling:
How you resolve the errors depends on the error message you get.
But when we goto BD87 and process the IDOCs manually, these are getting posted and the hierarchy is loading.
Can someone please guide me on what is the issue with the IDOCs and how to make them to post automatically.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Sachin

Hi,
This will happen due to Non-updated IDOCu2019s in the Source system i.e., occurs whenever LUWu2019s are not transferred from the source system to the destination system. If you look at RSMO of the status tab, the error message would appear like u201CtRFC Error in Source Systemu201D or u201CtRFC Error in Data Warehouseu201D or simply u201CtRFC Erroru201D depending on the system from where data is being extracted. Sometimes IDOC are also stuck on R/3 side as there were no processors available to process them. The solution for this Execute LUWu2019s manually. Go to the menu Environment -> Transact. RFC -> In the Source System from RSMO which will asks to login into the source system. The u201CStatus Textu201D for stucked LUWu2019s may be Transaction Recorded or Transaction waiting. Once you encounter this type of status Execute LUWu2019s manually using u201CF6u201D or Editexecute LUWu2019s(F6).Just keep on refreshing until you get the status u201CTransaction is executingu201D in the Production system. We can even see the stuck IDOCu2019c in Transaction BD87 also.Now the data will be pulled into the BW.
Hope it helps a lot.
Thanks and Regards,
Kamesham

Data packet not getting processed

Hi SDN's
I m loading data from one ODS to 4 regions , the source ODS is successfully loaded from der to the data targets the load is getting failed or taking loang time .
upto transfer rules the data is successful, in update rules data packets are not getting processed
kindly suggest solution, points will be assigned
thx in advance

Hi Katam,
In the target ODSs go to the monitor screen for a particular request -> in the menu bar go to environment -> transactRFC-> in the datawarehouse -> give the ID and date -> execute.
Check if there are entries in that. Usually this queue will be stuck and you need to execute the LUWs in the queue manually.
if it says transaction recorded u need to execute it manually
Please revert if any issues
Edited by: Pramod Manjunath on Dec 19, 2007 4:48 PM

IDOC status 64 not getting processed.

Hi Gurus,
      I have a problem where IDOC's with status 64 are not getting processed via background job. the IDOCs weere getting processed with the background job till today evening, but suddenly no changes were made and the processing of IDOC's with status 64 has stopped and they keep filling up, when i checked the log of the Background job it says finished, and the log has the following information,
17.09.2009 19:05:23 Job started                                                                   00           516          S
17.09.2009 19:05:23 Step 001 started (program RBDAPP01, variant POS_IDOCS, user ID SAPAUDIT)      00           550          S
17.09.2009 19:05:25 No data could be selected.                                                    B1           083          I
17.09.2009 19:05:25 Job finished                                                                  00           517          S
Kindly advise on this.
Regards,
Riaz.

When i process the IDOC's using BD87, they gets processed wiwth out aany issues no dump is displayed, idoc gets a status 53 after processing via BD87.
There is another problem how ever there are other jobs scheduled to run in the background other than this background job which are getting cancelled and have two different error logs for different jobs they are as follows.
1) 18.09.2009 02:00:06 Job started                                             00           516          S
18.09.2009 02:00:06 Logon not possible (error in license check)             00           179          E
18.09.2009 02:00:06 Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE      00           564          A
2) 18.09.2009 00:55:27 Job started                                                          00           516          S
18.09.2009 00:55:27 Step 001 started (program RSCOLL00, variant , user ID JGERARDO)      00           550          S
18.09.2009 00:55:29 Clean_Plan:Gestartet von RSDBPREV                                   DB6PM         000          S
18.09.2009 00:55:29 Clean_Plan:beendet                                                  DB6PM         000          S
18.09.2009 01:00:52 ABAP/4 processor: DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR                                00           671          A
18.09.2009 01:00:52 Job cancelled                                                        00           518          A
This is a production server and the Licence is valid till 31.12.9999, and has no issues with the license.

RSEOUT00 - Idoc not getting processed

Hi All,
I have few idocs in prod.system with status 30 and they are not getting processed using RSEOUT00.
I tried using back ground job / forgrond / BD87 also but they are not getting converted to 03 status.
receiver port is xmlgen.
Any thing like idoc lock ? or something other that is preventing it process ?
Please let me know if anything.

check out the multiple threads in SDN regarding this issue
idoc remains random in status 30
some of the common pointers looks to be locked IDOC (check in SM12), SM58 to see if anything is in the RFC queue (though I doubt that would be the case)..
How are you generating your idoc? standard FM or MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE?

Planned Independent Requirement Not getting displayed in MD04

Hi,
I am assigning material to nwa and doing advance procurement by using procurement type PIR. Reservation is getting created after release of activity but the same is not getting displayed in MD04.
The items of the reservation are getting displayed in MB23.
what could be the reason for this?
Regards,
B P Singh

Hi,
Planned Independent requirements (PI) are normally configured for consumption by 'Dependent' requirements. Hence the PIR would have been replaced by the reservation from 'dependent' requirement. You can test and verify the same in development system.
Regards
Murali

Restrict Product Allocation if Planned order is not getting created

Hello All,
We have a scenario that when ever a Sales Order is getting created, Product allocation assignment will be done automatically and planned orders will be created for that requirement in APO.
There are some cases where in because of wrong Variant Configuration, Planned orders wont be created. Our requirement is to delete the Product Allocation automatically or to stop the product allocation assignment if the planned orders are not created.
Do we have any standard setting for doing so or Kindly suggest me some BADI's which can be used for it.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Srinivas.D

Srinivas,
A rather odd requirement.
Have you tried in SCM APO 'Maintain check instructions' to perform the product check first, then allocation? I would think that if the product check failed, then allocation would not be consulted, and no allocation therefore assigned.
IMG > APO > GATP > General Settings > Maintain check instructions
Best Regards,
DB49

After MRP planned orders are not getting generated?

HI,
Our bussiness is make to stock and repetetive manufacturing.
We have a prob in running MRP, i enter the demand in MD61 on day basis and after running MRP for some materials all planned orders getting generated wrt to demand but for some materials only some planned orders getting generated means it's not taking full demand ex i have material A and paln is 1000 for 10days i entered demand in MD61 for 10days 100 each and if B material is having same 1000 demand so i enter 100 each then i run MRP and the out put is im getting 10planned orders with 100 each qty for A material where as for material B im not getting full 10 orders only 2 or 3 with 100 each what could be the reason ?
Thanks
KK
Edited by: kiran kumar on Mar 23, 2010 10:19 AM
Edited by: kiran kumar on Mar 23, 2010 10:20 AM

Dear Kiran,
As your saying it is Make to Stock, system will consider Availble stock in Net Req. Calculation
what is startegy mainatined for A & B
if you go with Strategy 11 then system will not consider the stock & Creates the requirements
Regards
Madhu

SM35 session is not getting processed in background

HI Folks,
I am using BDC (open group, Insert group, Close Group) to create a SM35 session and calling RSBDCSUB program to process created session.
this program is being executed in background job,
Issue is, when this program is scheduled to run with my user ID(dialog user) is running fine i.e. session is getting processed completely.
however, when job is schedule with background user, session is getting created with status NEW, but not processed, we have to go to SM35 and manually process that session.
Does anybody come across such issue, What could be the reason, I could see authorization might be the problem.
please advice.
Thanks,
Brahma,

Hi brahmanandam,
You need use RSBDCSUB and submit it using the session name u generated...
SUBMIT RSBDCSUB AND RETURN
USER SY-UNAME
using selection-set 'VAR'.
Where VAR is ur variant name

Batch Input Session for RFUMSV50 is not getting processed.

Dear All,
When i am trying to transfer the Service Tax Inetrim account to Service tax final account with the help of the program RFUMSV50 the batch input session is getting generated without any error. But when i process the same in SM35 it is not getitng processed.
Please advice on this.
Regards,
Rajeswari Shankar.

Hello Rajeswari,
Yes, this is normal.
When batch input sessions is generated with any error, this does not mean that you can execute it after via SM35 without any error
Moreover, you have the option in SM35 to execute it and with option "display error only", so this means that it can happen that there is no error
For example, the profit center is mandatory, and it is missing in the document. In that case the system will display error and ask you to fulfill the profit center
Please tell me, which error you have (message number)
Thanks
Tarek

Savings Plan Contribution is not getting processed in Payroll

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for