SBS2011 Exchange Migration (Server configuration change is temporarily preventing access)

Greetings,
I 've begun an exchange migration from SBS2011 (Exch 2010) to 2013 Exchange.  I am on this step of the deployment assistant, for reference,  http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exdeploy2013/Checklist?state=2419-W-EQBEAgAAQAAAAQEAAQAAAAg~
I can login and access any users mailbox with the respective credentials if their mailbox is on the SBS exchange server.
Ive migrated a couple test users, and while I can access their owa box if I browse to the localhost of the 2013 server, I cannot access their mailbox internally nor externally if I go to the external FQDN of the owa site.  All other users with mailboxes
still on the 2010 exchange work.
I get this message for those with mailboxes on the new server: A server configuration change is temporarily preventing access to your account. Please close all Web browser windows and try again in a few minutes. If the problem continues, contact your helpdesk.
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Hi,
On current situation, please check if you move mailboxes to the new Database properly. Please refer to Olaf’s
solution in following thread and check if can help you.
OWA
not working after SBS2008 to SBS 2011 Migration
If any update, please feel free to let me know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

Similar Messages

  • In server 2008 r2 i cant prevent access to extra drive letters(apart from a,b,c,d) via gpo

    in server 2008 r2 i want to prevent access to extra drives like g,h,i,j drives via GPO i have been able to successfully hide these extra drives but not able to prevent access to restrict them  i have hidden these extra drive letters via code pasting
    with hidedrives.adm file on right clicking adminstrative templates in GPO and adding  templates but i dont know the code for preventing access to drives. HELP me need this fast 

    Hi Manish,
    Based on your description, we can try enabling the following policy:
    User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Windows Explorer\
    Prevent access to drives from My Computer
    If we enable this policy, users cannot view the contents of the selected drives in My Computer and Windows Explorer. Also, they cannot use the
    Run dialog box, the Map Network Drive dialog box, or the Dir command to view the directories on these drives.
    However, this policy does not prevent users from using programs to access local and network drives. And, it does not prevent them from using the Disk Management snap-in to
    view and change drive characteristics.
    Regarding this policy, the following article can be referred to for more information.
    Prevent access to drives from My Computer
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc978514.aspx
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Build Number of Exchange 2007 Server Not Change when Installed Rollup 14 updated

    I have a project to Upgrade Exchange Server from 2007 SP2 to 2013 with Lastest update. I found in Upgrade Instruction required Update Exchange Server to atleast 2007 SP3 RU10 version
    Installation of Service Pack 3 was successful. and I continue to install RU14 patch... Installation look Complete but build number of Exchange Server wasn't changed. and I already to Update Windows Patches to lastest update and restart but build number is
    same
    I try to reinstall RU14 patch by Powershell with administrator credential ,configure Execution Policy to Unrestricted and following are MSI verbose mode log
    Rollup.log
    Thanks

    I have a project to Upgrade Exchange Server from 2007 SP2 to 2013 with Lastest update. I found in Upgrade Instruction required Update Exchange Server to atleast 2007 SP3 RU10 version
    Installation of Service Pack 3 was successful. and I continue to install RU14 patch... Installation look Complete but build number of Exchange Server wasn't changed. and I already to Update Windows Patches to lastest update and restart but build number is
    same
    I try to reinstall RU14 patch by Powershell with administrator credential ,configure Execution Policy to Unrestricted and following are MSI verbose mode log
    Rollup.log
    Thanks
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/03/08/3409469.aspx
    Dude, where's my rollup?
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Error accessing Name Server Configuration

    Hello,
    I have installed WebAS 6.40 SP11 and deployed JDI SP11 on a single stand-alone machine, which is configured as Landscape and Name Server. When I try to access the Name Server Configuration in the DTR I get a "Server not found" error.
    The URL is http://<server>:<port>/dtr/system-tools/administration/NameServerConfiguration
    Where can I search for the reason? Any hints?
    Regards,
    Bjoern

    Hi Bjorn,
         As of SP11, the name server configuration requires SSL to be accessed.  Thus you need to set up your JDI box for SSL communications then the address would be:
    https://<server>:<SSL port>/dtr/system-tools/administration/NameServerConfiguration
    SP11 is the first SP to require this SSL access.  Note that the communication between your JDI and the Name Server does NOT need to be SSL.  You can use the same configuration you used before.  Only the access to the name server configuration needs to be SSL.
         Hope this helps,
           --Greg

  • Howto deploy a temporary exchange 2013 server for migration between two Office 365 accounts?

    Objective:
    We plan to migrate our office 365 from our current tennant (E3) to a new tennant (M) to drastically cut our annual costs for the same services, while retaining the mail and group memberships of all our users. This will involve installing an exchange server
    to download and upload mail from the old tennant to the new tennant.
    Background: 
    We are a longtime O365 customer, and have been a customer since before the "Midsize business" plans existed. There is no "cookie cutter" migration path from E3 to M. Microsoft currently recommends deploying an MS exchange server and off-boarding
    the mailboxes from your E3 subscription and then On-boarding them to a new account under the M plan.  As ridiculous as this is, this is indeed the path our company has decided to go. It isn't cool/fair that we're being shackled to the E plans (that are
    vastly more expensive) when we're a small/midsize business that has been a longtime customer of O365, while new customers of equal size to us can expect to save over $4000 annually. The services (when compared) offered are nearly identical.
    After calling MS support several times for guidance for this issue, I am advised that we should contact a 'partner' and ask for their support in doing this migration. We did as requested and were provided a quote to the tune of approximately $15,000 to do this
    migration for us. Obviously this is unacceptable, and thus our business has decided to rely on my abilities to get it done. Again, involving an MS partner is not an option.
    Environment:
    1 MS AD domain:
    - Original FQDN was @contoso.ca of this domain and UPNs were [email protected]
    - UPN has been changed to [email protected] to allow for ADFS
    - ADFS has been deployed and SSO works for all users with UPN [email protected]
    - An "On-Prem exchange server" does not yet exist
    1 O365 Account where main tennant FQDN is @corp.com
    - There are 5 registered domains
    -contoso.ca
    -corp.com
    - contoso.legacy.ca
    -deprecated/will be deleted
    -deprecated/will be deleted
    - There are 40 E3 licenses, all using a @corp.com UPN
    - There are 5 E1 licenses (we acknowledge that these will be upgraded to an M following the migration) that use the UPN contoso.legacy.ca
    - No accounts currently use contoso.ca for email
    - O365 was upgraded to 'the latest version' sometime in summer 2013.
    Migration Plan (High Level):
    Setup a local windows server (trial license)  
      Deploy an exchange 2013 server (trial license) on the aforementioned windows server  http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/hh973395.aspx
      Prepare and deploy Dirsync Deployment
    of Dirsync
      Add exchange to office 365 and begin replicating the mailboxes from the cloud to the exchange server. Wait for synchronization to complete.
    More information: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh534377(v=exchg.150).aspx
    http://help.outlook.com/en-us/140/ff633682.aspx
      Evaluate total time it took to sync data. 
    Time it takes to download data to exchange should be relatively similar to time it takes to restore mail to the new service.
      Open a new office365 account under the M plan.
      Plan a 1 hour mail & contoso.ca domain login outage
      temporarily change all user UPN's to match the new tennant
      perform a dirsync to the new tennant
      disable dirsync after all accounts have been auto-created/provisioned
      re-establish UPN + mail access.
      Plan a date and time for the cut over.
      remove the exchange hybrid server from the old tennant. 
      Point MX records directly to the exchange server.
      Cut office 365 service.
      After the 30 minutes ~ 1 hour 'mandatory' wait time imposed by MS to 'register' the domain with O365, add @corp.com to
    the new tennant
      fix all user UPN's in the cloud to match their real UPN's.
    This can be done with powershell.
      attach exchange hybrid server to new tennant
      Point MX records to the new tennant 
      Migrate all data from the local exchange server to the cloud under the new plan.
    Current progress (Lab):
    I have created a sandbox (Lab with no internet access or connectivity to production) environment in VMware and cloned the following servers to it:
    1x Domain Controller (DC) running windows server 2012 (named DC02)
    1x DC running windows server 2008 R2 (named DC01)
    1x windows server 2012 R2 - prepped with all the pre-requisites to install exchange 2013. (named EXC01)
    Where I am stuck / Problem:
    I have installed exchange on the server EXC01 in the lab environment using my account. I am a domain administrator in the contoso.ca domain, but my UPN is [email protected]. 
    After the installation of exchange, I notice that my email address in Active Directory changed from @corp.com to @contoso.ca. By default, I do not see @corp.com to be an available email address to select as my email address, and changing it in AD does not resolve
    the problem. 
    In the exchange portal, I found "Mail flow ---> Accepted Domains", and believe I should add @corp.com to the accepted domain list. Questions:
    1) Must I add corp.com and the other domains that exist in office 365 to the local exchange before I go through with the hybrid wizard?
    2) If I must add them to exchange, I am provided with three choices: 
    - Authoritative Domain
    - Internal Relay Domain
    - External Relay Domain
    Given that the domain is currently in office365 and is authoritative there, which of these applies?
    3) Most documentation I have found has been about a one way migration from on-prem to the cloud. I have had a hard time finding a step by step guide for cloud to local (new server) and then back to cloud. Does anyone here have any good documentation for this
    process? Would love it if it took into consideration multiple UPN/email addresses.

    Hi,
    Here are my answers you can refer to:
    1. Yes, we should select the primary SMTP domain for our organization and any other accepted domains that will be used in the hybrid deployment:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj200787(v=exchg.150).aspx
    2. It depends on the usage of the specific accepted domain. And Exchange version has no influence.
    To determine it, you can firstly check the function of the three types in the following article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124423(v=exchg.150).aspx
    3. Here are some reference about the migration from on-premise Exchange server to Office 365:
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/office-365/exchange-online/configuring-exchange-2013-hybrid-deployment-migrating-office-365-exchange-online-part1.html
    Additionally, since the issue is related to Exchange online, I recommend you ask for help on our Exchange online forum to get more professional help:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/msonline/en-US/home?forum=onlineservicesexchange
    If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
    thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Migrate from Server 2003 (no Exchange, single server) to SBS 2011

    Are there any Technets or other Microsoft documentation on migrating from Server 2003 (no Exchange, single server) to SBS 2011?  I understand it is possible, but I would like confirmation and some documentation before purchasing the appropriate hardware
    and licenses.
    Thanks,
    Doug
    Doug Orr

    Hi Doug,
    In general, the migration is the similar with migrating process from SBS 2003. In addition, also have main
    difference.
    “The main difference is that you don’t have to remove the source and that you have to follow the migration
    instructions as the SBS migration wizard will not launch.”
    You can get above description from following similar thread. Please refer to.
    Migrate from Windows Server Standard 2003 (not SBS) to SBS 2011
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/68790e41-b833-4e81-8200-63852ab9e196/migrate-from-windows-server-standard-2003-not-sbs-to-sbs-2011?forum=smallbusinessserver
    Meanwhile, please refer to the following article. It may be helpful.
    Step By Step Guide To Migrating To SBS 2011
    http://www.techieshelp.com/step-by-step-guide-to-migrating-to-sbs-2011/
    Please Note: Since the web site is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft
    does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
    However, as Robert suggests, would you please confirm specific version of SBS? It may help us to understand
    clearly and provide correct information.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

  • Exchange 2013 Server Migration

    Hello,
    We are in the process of migrating from an Exchange 2003 server to an Exchange 2013 SP1 server. The EXCH2003 server is in a separate domain environment than the new EXCH2013 server. We plan to export all mail from the EXCH2003 server and import to the EXCH2013
    server.
    At this time we are seeing an issue with the new EXCH2013 SP1 server. When we test creating a new profile in Outlook 2010 SP2 on a client machine we receive the following errors:
    1) The action cannot be completed. The connection to Microsoft Exchange is unavailable. Outlook must be online or connected to complete this action.
    - also -
    2) The name cannot be resolved. The connection to Microsoft Exchange is unavailable. Outlook must be online or connected to complete this action.
    We are able to access OWA both internally and externally and can login under multiple user accounts. Also while logged into OWA, mail flow is working, able to send and receive.
    We installed and configured a new SSL trusted certificate on the Exchange 2013 SP1 server as well.
    At this time our main issue is with Outlook 2010 SP2 and Exchange 2013 SP1 not communicating with each other properly.
    Please let us know what other information is needed to help resolve this issue.
    Thank you,
    Jason Ringholz
    Regards, Jason

    As commented by ED please make sure autodiscover is pointed to exchange2013. 
    Please try to restart the services, restart  "MS exchange active directory topology services" It will restart the dependent services. Please restart "Microsoft Exchange System Attendant" service also and try
    After this try creating a test mailbox in exchange2013 and try to configure the newly created mailbox in outlook2010.
    http://support.sherweb.com/Faqs/Show/manual-configuration-guide-for-outlook-2010-exchange-2013
    Test OutlookAnywhere using
    https://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com/ and check for any error.
    Make sure you can ping exchange2013 server by it's name(Netbiosname and FQDN)
    Thanks,
    MAS
    Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Change name of AD site hosting Exchange 2010 server

    We want to change the name of an AD site which currently hosts an Exchange 2010 server.  Is this possible?  Are there specific steps we need to follow to keep Exchange up & running?
    Thanks

    Hi Sneaky,
    As Vincez mentioned, it is possible to change the name of the AD site with Exchange 2010 is hosted,you just need to restart the AD topology service after changing.
    You can also refer to the following threads:
    Changing AD Site name in Exchange 2010
    SiteName is hard-coded
    Best regards,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • How NOT to edit SSIS dtsx packages manually to change config filter in SQL Server configuration schema

    I have many packages that are using the package configuration with the following way:
    -ALL Packages have the XML configuration file that has only one proporty defined. The ConnectionString of the SQL Server connection that holds the configuration table for the rest of the properties
    -A SEPARATE SQL Server package configuration for
    each connection manager in the package. 
    -Finally an SQL Server configuration for all the properties that are specific to this package.
    I attach a pic of what i mean: Yellow is the XML config with the connectionstring, Blue the connectionamangers and purple the package specific.
    So with this setup  i can:
    -Change the xml file location and just point all the setup in another sql server or another database.
    - Or create different configuration filters in the same config table and try to go into the package and change the filter.
    With all the above the problem is that if i do anything from within VS, i am loosing the password in the connectionstring because i am not using the encrypt property. And i dont want to use it...
    What are my options? Just go in .dtsx with notepad and chage what i want BEFORE i open the package or before i deploy?
    Elias

    You are correct but:
    -I dont want to use EncryptSensitiveWithPassword, so:
    When i go to package configuration and try to change the ConfoigurationFilter to point to another setting then i am getting to the screen to select the property (connectionstring) and when i finish the DATABASE record for the setting is cleared from the
    Password= that i have put previously.
    So i short what i want:
    -No EncryptSensitiveWithPassword 
    -Being able to change configuration from within VS WITHOUT resetting the connectionstring string. 
    Elias
    Nope what you're asking is not possible
    There's certainly a purpose why each of things are given in the current format
    For design level settings you need to use connection manager properties and for it to persist values for someone other than creator to use you need to use protection level as EncryptSensitiveWithPassword 
    And for runtime settings you need to specify values in config which has to be editted from outside the package by editing dtsconfig file or using update query depending on whether config is stored in file/table. In both the cases you can identify password
    as a separate config item and modify its value from outside. That will work regardless of what you chose as protection level
    see
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/runeetv/archive/2009/12/22/ssis-package-using-sql-authentication-and-dontsavesensitive-as-protectionlevel.aspx
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • Migrated Exchange 2013 server - blocking common emails like netflix and amazon?

    We were using Exchange 2010 for years, and recently I upgraded to Exchange 2013 and signed up for Exchange Online Protection over the weekend (all at the same time, upgrade, migration, sign up for EOP, etc.).  Some mail is making it through just fine,
    while a lot of email is being blocked.  EOP says the email was "delivered" but MessageTracking on our exchange box says Event ID: FAIL...
    I'd like to know more about the FAIL ID... how do I find out what made it fail?  I'm guessing it was a transport rule, but when I got to Mail Flow -> Rules - there is NOTHING there.  
    Running "Get-TransportAgent" returns these values:
    I disabled the malware agent manually on my box since I'm using the EOP stuff now... how can I see or edit the rules that are in place if they do not show up as rules in the ECP?
    It's big name companies like amazon, netflix, etc that are getting blocked... I can't see a reason why they would be blocked now on a migrated server and not on my old server... Can anyone provide some insight?  I'd GREATLY appreciate it!

    I would tend to agree with you that you don't need them.
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2013/security-message-hygiene/anti-spam-and-anti-malware-protection-exchange-2013-part1.html
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Lync 2013 Android - your server configuration has changed. Please restart Lync

    Lync 2013 on Android devices is giving error after every 5 minute "your server configuration has changed. Please restart Lync". 
    Calls gets dropped when this error occurs.
    we are using server 2012 R2 as reverse proxy and have changed the Proxy time out for External web service URL to 960 secs with no luck.

    Hi M.Irfan84,
    I would like to confirm the following information.
    1. Do we have run “iisreset /noforce” to apply the change?
    2. And does this issue only impact on Android device?
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Configuration changes needed on Oracle VM server/manager post IP change

    Hi Gurus,
    We have Oracle VM 3.2.1 Server and Manager installed on couple of servers. We have created few VMs and configured them for internal use. Internal IT team is changing server IP addresses for these servers, please let me know what are the configuration changes we need to make for the Oracle VM server and Manager Services to come up fine aftre IP changes.
    Thanks,
    Aditya

    Hi,
    Are you using a Clustered Servel pool? if yes, the server pool heart beat disk is over an iSCSI on NFS partition/disk ?
    Are you using iSCSI or NFS for the repository Location?
    Are you using a VALN connection or not?
    Best Regards

  • Can the ACE be configured for logging configuration changes to syslog server ?

    Hi,
    On all our routers, switches and firewalls we've configured syslog so we get logs when configuration changes occur.
    Is this possible on the ACE too ?
    regards,
    Sebastian  

    Hi Sebastian,
    Yes it is possible but depends upong the logging level you have set. So logging trap 5 should be able to get you the configuration changes or command execution logs.
    Nov  1 2013 11:20:33 : %ACE-5-111008: User 'admin' executed the 'logging buffered 6' command.
    Nov  1 2013 11:20:48 : %ACE-5-111008: User 'admin' executed the 'no rserver testlog' command.
    So you should see these level 5 logs on syslog if logging trap 5 is configured.
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Kanwal

  • Changing the Default OAB from an Exchange 2003 server to an Exchange 2010

    I am in the process of decommissioning my old Exchange 2003 servers. All mailboxes have been moved over to Exchange 2010. I already have OABs and Public Folders created on the Exchange 2010 servers. Since I see the "Default Offline Address List",
    which is pointing to my old Exchange 2003 server and the Default OAB is set to "True", can I just make an existing Exchange 2010 OAB the "Default OAB"? I have read that I have to perform a move on the "Default Offline Address List"
    OAB. Is this required?
    thanks
    Noe

    Configure the Exchange 2010 mailbox databases to use the Exchange 2010 OAB, and leave the Exchange 2003 databases alone.  You can delete the old OAB just before taking the Exchange 2003 servers out of production.  The "Default" setting
    means the OAB is the one that's assigned by default when you create a new mailbox database, so yes, you should set that.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2010 Hybrig configuration removal

    Our Exchange environment currently consists of an Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010 SP3 hybrid server. We were looking at moving all mailboxes from our Exchange 2003 server to Office 365 via the Exchange 2010 Hybrid server. Due to business decisions,
    we have stopped our Office 365 deployment and are moving all mailboxes back on premise. With this in mind, I am looking for some guidance on how best to approach this.
    Once all mailboxes are moved back on premise, would it be better to re-license our Exchange 2010 server and remove the Hybrid configuration then move all remaining 2003 mailboxes to the 2010 server or, build a new 2010 SP3 server and decommission
    the Hybrid server.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated as I haven't found anyone who has gone this route before.
    Russ

    If the current server has the horsepower required to host your mailboxes and the other roles, I'd use it.  No reason to add complexity if it's not required.  If this server is underpowered, though, I'd remove Exchange from it before I added the
    new Exchange 2010 server.  This will allow you to have a smoother experience in your migration process.  If you have configured your organization for hybrid operations (including legacyExchange names on certificates, etc), you should be able to just
    point these to your Exchange 2010 servers (instead of to the cloud) to support your migration.  Make sure these changes are done before you start adding active mailboxes to the Exchange 2010 server, whichever one it is you start using.

Maybe you are looking for