Scale a Paint's "path" without distorting the Brush "strokes"?

Anyway to scale a Paint Brush "stroke's" "path" along only one axis without distorting the brush strokes?

Besides having no idea what you're trying to say, I don't think you're considering the problem.
Here's the same issue, solved with regards lines and their strokes distorting:
scale a line, not it's outline/stroke...
That's a particularly cool trick.
But I don't see anything similarly possible with Paint Brush based "strokes".
Please, consider that this is what I'm "painting" the line with, so I'd like the circles (dots) to not distort into ovals when scaling the path in only one dimension, see my answer at bottom:
Small Circles (dots) on a path instead of dashes?

Similar Messages

  • How can I move columns in Numbers without distorting the formula in other cells?  In Excel I can cut and paste entire columns and the formula in other cells adjusts accordingly.  When I do it in Numbers, the formula messes up.  How can I do this?

    How can I move columns in Numbers without distorting the formula in other cells?  In Excel I can cut and paste entire columns and the formula in other cells adjusts accordingly.  When I do it in Numbers, the formula messes up.  How can I do this?
    For example: I have formulas in columns D and F that relate to columns C to CU
    If I want to move one column from one position to another (say S to T), the formula loses the colums that was moved, i.e. it doesn't recognize it has moved, rather sees it as deleted...  How can I do this without distorting the formula?

    Thanks for the feedback.
    If I often urge askers to look at the available resources, it's because  a large range of questions asked in the forums are already answered in these documents.
    As they are PDFs, they are easy to search in.
    CAUTION
    Download them while they are available.
    Given what is delivered with iBooks Author, I'm afraid that we will not get such easy to use documents.
    Searching infos in the  iBooks Author documentation available on line is awfully cumbersome and a lot of embedded links are wrongly flagged this way. In the Help files they aren't links but underlined strings.
    It seems that the tool used to generate the web pages was wrongly configured.
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 22 janvier 2012
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 12 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.2
    My Box account  is : http://www.box.com/s/00qnssoyeq2xvc22ra4k
    My iDisk is : http://public.me.com/koenigyvan

  • In illustrator, is there a way to reduce anchors points in a segment path without altering the path?

    In illustrator, is there a way to reduce anchors points in a segment path without altering the path?
    Is there a better and more efficient way to reduce anchors points than using the pen-minus tool?
    Thanks.

    That's what the Simplify command is for. It tries to reduce the number of segments while you judge the results and adjust the parameters accordingly.
    Of course, if any given curve were possible with just two anchors, then all paths could have just two anchors. So obviously, fewer segments is not always possible.
    As with many other things, though, you need to realize this: Automatic functions have no human discernment whatsoever. That's just as true in the matter of optimizing paths as it is in auto-tracing. The program routine which tries to figure out which anchors can go and which anchors must stay has absolutely no idea of what the path is actually a drawing of. Only you know that. So the bottom line remains the same: Optimizing paths correctly should be done with deliberate discernment, not just left up to dumb automated routines.
    Illustrators draw paths deliberately--one anchor at a time--for good reason.
    JET

  • Why cant i adjust the size of the brush strokes in CS4

    so i got the trial of CS4 and when i try to adjust the size of the brush stroke it is grayed out and i cant use it. also with the pencil tool i cant adjust the amount of smoothing i want (which is none) whats up with this? i never had any problems with MX2004

    Hi Jillian,
    You can probably solve this problem by increasing the Top Margin in the Document Inspector. Have you tried this, and did it cause you any problems?
    Jerry

  • How can I increase the tempo of a song without distorting the vocals?

    I have a song I recorded, with the vocals and backing track on seperate tracks.
    The song has been recorded a bit too slow, and I need to increase the tempo. However, when I do this, the vocals become distorted and have a wavy sound.
    Is there any way I can increase the tempo of the song without distoring the vocals? I've tried doing it on the final song (merged tracks) and on the vocals alone, but nothing seems to work. It doesn't make sense, since when you do the same thing to a song by a professional artist, you can increase the tempo of the song without distoring the vocals.
    What am I doing wrong? How can I increase the tempo of my song without distoring the vocals?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    in general GB doesn't do such a great job with changing tempo of audio recordings, what you might find works better is to export your song uncompressed and then use an audio editor:
    http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/GBFAQ.html#audioeditors
    (Let the page FULLY load. The link to your answer is at the top of your screen)

  • How can I change the tempo without distorting the vocals?

    Hi
    I have a song which is quite fast, so I tried to record it slow then increase the tempo after I'd recorded it. The problem is when I do this, the vocals get all distorted and sound wavy.
    Is there anything I can do to increase the tempo without this happening?
    Thanks

    I see your point, but then why is it when you an import a song from itunes and increase the tempo the vocals dont become distorted?
    I can understand how chaging the pitch of a track can distort the vocals, but not the tempo.

  • How to make web pages easier to read?  If I increase the font size web pages look distorted and unusable.  The same goes for mail.  I love the ease of use with a MAC but at 55 I need better sized fonts without distorting the web sites?  Any suggestions?

    As you can see I am new to MAC;s so please be  patient with me. 

    Yes, that made the fonts larger, but I lose viewing the full windows of Safari and Mail, the edges are cut off aand I cannot restore them by click and dragging them fully open again.   I appreciate the quick response, but I still have the same issue of ddistorted webpages and mail.

  • What is the quickest way to paint a straight brush stroke that is NOT on 90 or 180 degrees?

    I do perspective drawing for interior designers and do the colouring in Photoshop. Think of old fashioned painting with a brush/copic marker against a ruler to get a straight line, but with varying thickness or opacity. I would like the same effect in Photoshop.
    The closest that I have come is to press Shift before the brush stroke. That constrains the stroke, makes a very neat line AND allows me to vary the line/brush thickness as I paint.
    Often the lines may need to be at an arbitrary angle which is NOT 90 or 180 degrees. The only way I know of for getting that brush stroke in the correct position is to make sure that each stroke is on a separate layer. Select the stroke/transform/rotate. Quite a few steps as opposed to the one it takes to draw the line in the correct position and angle with a brush/ copic marker on paper.
    This becomes time consuming and difficult once you have many lines to paint and if you need to be accurate (as with perspective drawing). If you are working on a very large canvas the point of rotation can sometimes be very far from where you are working (i.e. on a vanishing point) and difficult to see without a lot of Zooming and moving around on the canvas.
    To Stroke a path with the brush gives an unrealistic and even line thickness which does not look hand painted.
    Any suggestions?
    Has anyone ever used a ruler while drawing on a Cintiq? That may give the desired effect and be much quicker than selecting and rotating.

    Thank you R_Kelly! Though it is still a bit tricky judging the angle as you rotate the page, your workaround is actually a bit quicker than having to rotate each line individually.
    This allows me to see the line as it develops in place and I also don't necessarily need to create a new layer for each new brush stroke, if I work carefully. Very close to placing the ruler on the work space before drawing a line!
    Thank you!

  • How to increase the size of text boxes in FCPX without stretching the text inside?

    How to increase the size of text boxes in FCPX without stretching the text inside?

    There are two basic Title formats — I should say Layouts — available:  Text (plain) and Paragraph.  (The plain text version usually does not appear with the blue dot controls — those generally appear for the paragraph type control.)
    If the Title is using a Paragraph layout, it's like having a mini version of Text Edit available inside FCPX. You can tell when you click on the text (when the title is selected) -- a rectangle will appear around the text like so:
    double clicking on the text will give you the bounds controls which you can use to redefine the text area without distorting the text. Once selected, notice the button that appears in the top right corner of the canvas:
    Pressing that will activate the ruler. You can right click on the ruler and add Tab Stops (left, right, center and decimal.)
    So if the title uses paragraph formatting, you can create a very WYSIWYG type of display text (use the Text inspector to alter text selections within the paragraph bounds.)

  • Rejoin path without removing anchor handle?

    Im wondering if it is possible to rejoin an open path without removing the bezier handle of the open point.
    I find that I quick switch to the direct selection tool to rotate my previously placed anchor or some other quick edit, and then when I want to carry on with the path I click the last point, which has the adverse effect for me of turning the open point into a mixed curve/corner and I have to redrawn the open anchor handle. Photoshop doesn't behave like this when clicking on open anchors, you have to alt click to achieve such behaviour.
    Is there something I'm missing to stop this happening?
    Thanks

    Dan,
    Assume you're drawing a path with the pen, point-by-point, clicking to place corner points; clickDragging to place smooth points. You've just placed a smoothPoint, so both its handles are extended. Now you want to access the white pointer to make an adjustment to that most-recently placed anchor before continuing with the Pen.
    Don't make a "hard switch" to the white pointer (by selecting the tool in the Toolbox or by tapping A). Instead, momentarily invoke it by pressing and holding the Ctrl key. Make the desired adjustment. Release the Ctrl key and the Pen comes back. Simply click or clickDrag where you want the next anchor; you do not have to click the last-placed anchor to resume drawing the path. Doing so, the outboard handle of the last-placed anchor will not be retracted.
    If pressing Ctrl momentarily invokes the black pointer instead of the white pointer, that's because the black pointer is the one you most recently used before selecting the Pen. (That nonsense is part and parcel of AI's endlessly tedious two-selection-tool interface, to which AI still clings, despite its having been prooved both unnecessary and undesirable about three decades ago by FreeHand's far better selection interface.)
    Pressing the Alt key similarly momentarily invokes the Convert tool to make adjustments, and releasing the Alt key lets you resume with the Pen (desipte AI's display of selected anchors failing to reflect that).
    JET

  • How do i add filter to just brush strokes and paint fill not pencil.

    Sorry it is kind of hard to explain in the description.
    What i want to know is if i can pretty much just select the brush strokes and paint fill on a layer and have the pencil lines left alone.
    I want to filter, then blur the brush strokes and paint fill on the layer but keep the pencil lines sharp, i have been doing paint fill and brush stroked on a different layer than the pencil lines but this takes ages because i have to draw the picture out twice everytime using the brush strokes to go along the pencil lines so i can fill them in with color, if i could blur them on same layer without effecting pencil lines then i could just fill the pencil lines with paint bucket instead of redarwing the lines with brush tool if this makes sence.
    Here is a picture to show what im trying to achieve
    The pencil lines are on a different layer to brush strokes

    if you convert to a movieclip (right click>convert to symbol>movieclip) whatever you want to filter, you can filter it independent of other objects.

  • Mac OSX Yosemite   Wacom Intuos 4 - Painting not possible due to terrible brush lags

    I recently updated my iMac (27", end of 2013, 3,5 GHz intel core 7, 16 GB Ram + Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M 4096mb) to OS X Yosemite, and also installed the new driver for my wacom intros 4 tablet (version 6_3.9w5).
    But since OS X 10.10, I got nothing but troubles with CS6 (version 13.0.6) - whenever I try to paint with a brush (it doesn't matter which one I choose), the stroke gets applied laggy and delayed. I already installed the white windows plug-in but nothing changed.
    When this happens and I try to quit PS, most of the time it says the program stopped working and I need to force quit it.
    When I use my mouse in PS, on the other hand, every stroke is fast and smooth as it used to be.

    I had the SAME problem. This worked for me:
    Before, I was running Yosemite 10.10 on an iMac i7
    I had the latest driver from Wacom (I tried a couple of older drivers, to no avail)
    I'm running PS CS6, with all update
    I'm using a Wacom Intuos 5 medium tablet
    I was getting super bad lag while using the brush and other tools. Let's say I'd open an image to edit. After selecting the keyboard shortcut for my brush, I'd make one pass with the brush on the image. The brush stroke would be there, but it wouldn't show up in the history palette. Only after making another brush stroke would the previous action be recorded in the history palette. I was lagging real bad. In between brush strokes I wouldn't be able to change tools or even change the size of my brush. Nothing worked. I'd have to click off the image to regain control, or click the trackpad to regain control. BTW, the trackpad worked perfectly. NO lag for anything in PS. The polygonal lasso tool, one of my favorite selection tools, was basically unusable with the lag. I'd have to click several times before it would catch up and then sometime it would just randomly close the selection. So that was useless.
    Ok, so that's what was happening to me. My tablet was basically useless. It took triple the time to work with it.
    All I did was update Yosemite to 10.10.1 and the tablet now works PERFECTLY in photoshop cs6 for me. I'm not sure you'll get the same results but it worked for my computer. I really didn't think it would work so I was pleasantly surprised when it did.
    I had tried installing older wacom drivers. Didn't work.
    I tried reinstalling PS CS6 in a new user profile on my Mac. Didn't work.

  • Dots at the Ends of Brush Strokes?

    I just uprgraded to CS4 from CS3 and there's a problem with the brushes that I can't seem to figure out. I have the brush set to pen pressure, and at the end of each stroke, there's a dot. Like this:
    /Users/jpb1343/Desktop/Picture 13.png
    I thought it may have been my drawing tablet, but CS3 worked fine. Is there anything I can do to make the brush strokes smooth?

    Sorry. Does this work?
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1kJXbKAzdBCZJGbXWiNzfGQPfS0ur1" /></a>
    <img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1kJXbKAzdBCZJGbXWiNzfGQPfS0ur1_thumb.png" border="0" />
    <br />I use a Hanvon drawing tablet to draw. Is it not compatible with PS?

  • How do I use a path as an argument without breaking the -classpath option?

    How do I use a path as an argument without breaking the -classpath option?
    I have the following Korn Shell Script:
    #!/bin/ksh
        CSVFILE=/EAIStorageNumbers/v1/0001/weekly05222006.csv
        OUTPUTFILE=/EAIStorageNumbers/v1/0001/08000000.txt
        PAGEMBR=0800F341
        cd /EAIStorageNumbers/v1/bin/
        java -classpath com.dtn.refinedfuels.EAIStorageNumbers $CSVFILE $OUTPUTFILE $PAGEMBRWhen I run the shell script, I return the following error:
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: /EAIStorageNumbers/v1/0001/weekly05222006/csv
    Thus, the -classpath option sees the first argument as a classpath. When I remove the -classpath option, I get a different error, which is another issue:
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: au/com/bytecode/opencsv/CSVReader
    at com.dtn.refinedfuels.EAIStorageNumbers.main(Unknown Source)
    Thoughts or suggestions on how I can get the -classpath option to work with the defined Korn Shell Script variables would be greatly appreciated.

    I think you're misunderstanding the classpath argument. This tells java where to look to find your classes. The argument you're supplying looks like the class that you want java to run. Run something like this: java -classpath $MY_CLASS_DIR my.package.MyClass arg1 arg2 arg3.

  • Scale path without affecting stroke width

    Hi all,
    This seems like it should be simple to do but I'm not having any luck here. Basically I have a path parented to a null that controls several things, scaling them down, rotating and moving across the composition. One of those items is a path with a stroke of 32 px.  I want to be able to scale the path itself down, but leave the stroke the same.
    I thought I could key the stroke width manually but that has no effect- scaling it up as the path scales down doesn't seem to change the stroke width at all at the end keyframe, only at the beginning keyframe. I see the px count start at 32 and increase up to as it moves along the timeline, even though the stroke width on screen is still getting smaller as if there were no change at all to the width.
    Thanks!

    You generally don't want to scale the layer that contains the stroke, you want add keyframes to the mask path and animate the size of the path. This is easy. You just start by double-clicking one of the vertices and using the transform box.
    If this technique does not work for you then you have two other options, both involving expressions. Both of these options use exactly the same expression to look at the scale of your null layer and both assume that the null is at 100% scale at the start of the animation. The option that I would choose would be to replace the mask path on a layer with stroke applied with shape layer path with stroke applied. You have so many more options and you're dealing with vector information. With either solution this is the expression.
    sf = thisComp.layer("Control Null 1").transform.scale[0]/100;
    ov = value;
    nv = ov / sf
    sf (scale factor) is the x scale value of the controlling null that is the parent of the stroke layer or the layer with the stroke effect applied to a mask divided by 100. If you intend to scale X and Y of the parent you'll have to modify the expression and then combine the scale factors and this solution will not work as well.  The original scale value is divided by 100 to turn it into a decimal value
    ov (original value)  is the original set value of the stroke.
    nv (new value) is calculated by dividing the original value by the scale factor.
    This is just basic algebra from the 7th grade. If your controlling parent is scaled below 0 then the stroke will go away because the value will change to a negative number. If this is necessary in your composition you can write an if statement that will change the nv back to a positive number if the scale factor becomes less than or equal to zero and solves the divide by zero error you would get with a scale factor of zero.
    One last point, and this is important. This expression will produce accurate results if applied to the brush size of a mask path when using the Effects>Generate>Stroke effect to create your line but when scaled over 100% the line will begin to fall apart and anti aliasing will not be able to keep up with pixilation caused by the scale. Over about 120% the line will start to look thinner and over 140% it will look bad even though the stroke width is numerically accurate.
    I'll let you take it from here.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Yoga 13 - Compatible USB to ethernet devices for PXE booting

    Hi there,  I've recently been looking for a means to pxe boot the lenovo yoga 13 to enable me to then image it. After reading that pxe booting is possible I went out and bought a StarTech usb to ethernet adaptor (USB21000S2) but have had no luck so f

  • Output types by plant

    Hi, In our production client, I need to find all output types a particular plant for purchasing activities. Any idea , how i should find plant specific outputs. Thanks akkshaya

  • Balance of SECess on Service tax not in J2IUN

    Hello: I can get the balance of SECess on Service tax not in J2IUN. How can I do? And the table:J_1IEXCACC new added 3 field are about what kind of account? RG23A AT1-AT3 RG23C AT1-AT3  What kind of account should I assign to these fields? BR, Linda

  • How to reboot Adobe Applications?

    Hi Guys, Do some one know how to reboot Adobe Applications. If some one knows please share with me, I need to do in my mac computer. regards HARI

  • Need OS X v10.7 download

    There is an app that I would like to download, but get the message that it requires OS X v10.7.2.  I downloaded that version, but it wouldn't install.  I got the message that I needed to install OS X v10.7.  Unable to find version 10.7, I downloaded