Scan not picking up AP

I have a Cisco AP that Cisco Aironet adapter is no longer picking up with Scan. My internal Intel wireless card can pick up the AP, others using their Cisco cards can, and my Cisco card in another laptop can pick up the AP. I've uninstalled and reinstalled the software for the Cisco card, still a problem. What could be wrong?

Actually, I've tried the card in another laptop and it worked fine. Yesterday, I imported a config file I saved off months ago and it worked fine. Now, today without any modifications, it's not working. I agree, something has to be wrong with the PC card slot.

Similar Messages

Not picking up paper to scan to computer

Hi- this printer does not pick up the paper when scanning to a computer. It did until last Friday.
I can copy and it picks up the source paper and makes copies.
I can scan to USB and it picks up the papers and scans to USB.
But if I scan to computer, it does not pick up the paper, It sits in the tray. I hear some wheels rolling but evidently it is not the pick-up-the-paper-from-the-tray wheels. I can scan off the glass no problem...but that is just one sheet. paper is seated properly on teh tray- the screen acknowledges its presdense with "Document loaded"
Anything I can try before calling for service? I wiped clean all rollers and paper separators and I powered off and then back on the equipment. Let me know and thank you in advance.

Thanks X-23 for a quick reply ) I will try your suggest procedures on this Saturday when the MacBook and the printer are free-up from work. I will let you know the results.

Defender allowing omiga-plus to change browser not picked up on 3.5 hours scan

have problems with browsers being taken over but not picked up by defender cant seem to talk to anyone at microsoft

Harshit DBA india wrote:
I have already set memory_target and memory_max_target with enough space. but face same issue
SQL> show parameter memory
NAME TYPE VALUE
hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 12864M
memory_target big integer 12864M
shared_memory_address integer 0Hello,
That's what I am intending to say. When you have set MEMORY_TARGET and SGA_MAX_SIZE, Oracle gives preference to MEMORY_TARGET. Which is why the changes you make to SGA_MAX_SIZE would not be seen after you bounce the database.
Refer this What if I set MEMORY_MAX_TARGET and SGA_MAX_SIZE both?
If the reply seems to be helpful, then consider closing the thread by providing appropriate points.

Not Picking up one Index..!

hi,
I am Using Oracle 10g Version--10.2.0.1.0. I am getting one problem with this query what was the problem i don't understand it is not picking up one index which it is there in indexes. X_PCAT--P_CAT is the index and column from PARTY.
This is the Query..!
SELECT P_CODE , P_NAME, P_OB, P_CAT, P_SUB_CAT, P_BANK, P_PHONE1 || ' ' || P_PHONE2 || ' ' || P_PHONER, P_INTRO1, P_INTRO2, P_INTRO3
FROM SYSADM.PARTY WHERE ( P_CAT = 'DAHMEDABAD' ) AND
( P_OB != 0 OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT CB_P_CODE FROM SYSADM.CASH_BOOK WHERE P_CODE = CB_P_CODE) OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT B_PARTY FROM SYSADM.BILLS WHERE P_CODE = B_PARTY ) ) ORDER BY 4, 5, 1 ;
this is the Explain Plan for the above query..!
SELECT P_CODE , P_NAME, P_OB, P_CAT, P_SUB_CAT, P_BANK, P_PHONE1 || ' ' || P_PHONE2 || ' ' || P_PHONER, P_INTRO1, P_INTRO2, P_INTRO3
FROM SYSADM.PARTY WHERE ( P_CAT = 'DAHMEDABAD' ) AND
( P_OB != 0 OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT CB_P_CODE FROM SYSADM.CASH_BOOK WHERE P_CODE = CB_P_CODE) OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT B_PARTY FROM SYSADM.BILLS WHERE P_CODE = B_PARTY ) ) ORDER BY 4, 5, 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 62 0.14 1.49 3150 12049 0 1237
total 64 0.14 1.50 3150 12049 0 1237
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 58
Rows Row Source Operation
1237 SORT ORDER BY (cr=12049 pr=3150 pw=0 time=1495964 us)
1237 FILTER (cr=12049 pr=3150 pw=0 time=2962198 us)
2025 TABLE ACCESS FULL PARTY (cr=3527 pr=3150 pw=0 time=2004395 us)
1210 INDEX RANGE SCAN XCB_PARTY (cr=6077 pr=0 pw=0 time=28572 us)(object id 49459)
27 INDEX RANGE SCAN XB_PARTY (cr=2445 pr=0 pw=0 time=11430 us)(object id 49462)
So any wrong in this query.

An explain plan properly created using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY would be immensely helpful.
So would knowing what index it is you think should be used by Oracle to do what?
One thing I can tell you is that the construct P_OB != 0 OR is not one likely to favor index usage unless almost every value in the column is 0 and Oracle's decision to not use an index is affecting you in what way? Is the query taking too long or are you just fixating on the incorrect thought that full table scans are always bad: They are not.
PS: Give serious consideration to patching to 10.2.0.3.

Index not picked when bind parameter can be null?

Hi,
In my query i have a primary key say deptid and has an unique index defined.
when i do a query as
select * from dept where ((deptid = :pDeptId) or (:pDeptId is null))
index is not picked up and a full table scan happens.
Can one explain why?
Thanks
Manish

Solomon Yakobson wrote:
I purposely chose small table. Yes, optimizer calculated costs are such that FTS cost is same as combined cost of index fast scan + table access by rowid. And that is exactly what I am questioning. Set aside what you call "boundary" cases where rows are sparse enough (e.g. your example with lots of deleted rows) and similar scenarios (e.g. pctfree is very large, etc.) FTS is always less costly than index fast scan + table access by rowid by at least one IO. I understand, I am splitting hairs a bit since the difference is negligible, but still it is a sub-optimal plan.Solomon,
and yes, in those circumstances you describe the FTS will be chosen, so what is your point? Your test case represents such an "odd" scenario (sparse, large pctfree, etc., less rows than blocks, a clustering factor of the index less than the number of blocks of the table), so what do you want to prove using this test case? It doesn't represent the "normal" circumstances where the FTS is less costly.
In passing, the cost of the FTS and the combined operation are not the same in my default 10.2.0.4 database, the FTS is more expensive, as I've outlined previously.
The reason: It takes at least 1 multi-block I/O request to read the 5 blocks of the table. The optimizer assumes that the time it takes to perform a multi-block read request is 26ms when using default NOWORKLOAD system statistics with 8KB default block size. It assumes further it takes 12ms to perform a single-block read request, so the cost (expressed in single-block reads) of performing a single multi-block read request is 2.16. Since Oracle 9i, there is a hidden parameter "_table_scan_cost_plus_one" set to "true", it used to be "false" in 8i, making the cost 3.16, so we end up with a rounded cost of 3 for the FTS.
The cost of the combined index + table access is 2, one I/O for the index, plus one I/O for the table access. So from an optimizer perspective this plan is not sub-optimal, but the superior one, mainly due to the fact that one gets added to the table scan cost from 9i on, and you have the unusual clustering factor of 1.
As you can see, it takes a lot of "boundary" conditions that this happens, and it's all down to the fact that the table is so small, that is has only 4 rows in 5 blocks, and the clustering factor of the index is less than the number of blocks of the table, which is quite unusual. A "optimal" clustering factor usually corresponds to the number of blocks of the table, a "bad" clustering factor corresponds to the number of rows.
Therefore I suggested to "adjust" the clustering factor to a more usual value, but there is actually nothing usual about this test case since you have less rows than blocks.
So I guess you can say whatever you want about this being a "sub-optimal" plan, but I really don't see the point it makes, given the flawed test case. Run it with a more reasonable setup and the FTS will be used in those cases where it is reasonable according to the inputs the CBO gets.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Weblogic 10.3.2.0 installation does not pick the right JDK

The installation does not pick up the right jdk version that is jdk 11.6.0_11 . Although the machine is running the same. Instead it picks up jdk 1.6.0_14. have tested the machine many times. I am Installing Oracle SOA Suite 11g.

Inside "startWebLogic.sh" file add the JAVA_HOME like following (just below the "setDomainEnv.sh" call):
JAVA_HOME=C:\bea103\jdk1.6.0_17
See if this helps.
Thanks

I have an old iphone 3G that I want to use as an ipod touch. It does have a sim card and it has been reset but for some reason it will not pick up my wireless network, or any other wireless network. What is the problem?

I have an old iphone 3G that I want to use as an ipod touch. It does have a sim card in it and it has been reset. For some reason it will not pick up my wireless network in my house, or any other wireless network. What could be the problem?

Is this the problem:
iOS: Wi-Fi or Bluetooth settings grayed out or dim

AP - Payment Process not picking up Invoices

Hi All,
I am running the payment process from AP(Payments Manager).I have created 5 Invoices on 12-Dec-2013 and have attached the Pay Group. Once i run the payment process with the pay group none of my invoices has been picked up for processing.I have given the date range from 01-Dec-2013 to 13-Dec-2013
Please help i need close this task ASAP
Regards

Hi,
What are the payment terms on the invoices? If these are not IMMEDIATE, and the payment is not due, the system would not pick them up until they are due.
What is the payment method on the invoice and in the PPR? Are you running the PPR for electronically paid invoices but the invoices are set to be paid by check?
Are there any holds on the suppliers you are trying to pay?
What are the other parameters you gave when running the PPR? It helps to check those against the invoice to make sure they would qualify.
Information about the pararameters you are using and one of the invoices to be selected would be helpful.
Cheryl

Document type KR is not picking to Clear GL account with T-code F-03

Hi all,
My client wants to clear GL account Cash-in-Transit which is open item managed. He has posted two items. One is with KR document type like Intercompnay adjustment account debit (40) and Cash-in-Transit account credit (50). Second item is with SA document type like Cash-in-Transit accont debit (40) and Intercompany adjustment account credit (50). He did not give vendor number and appropriate posting key (31) while postings. With document type KR, he posted with posting keys 40 and 50. Now while clearing the GL account through T-code F-03, system is picking only SA document type. The system is not picking document type KR. He wants to clear the items with each other. I have checked the document type settings. Check boxes Intercompany postings and trading partner are active in both above document types.
How can the GL account be cleared ? Are any configuration settings missing ? Kindly advice as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
K.S.K

Hi,
First of all..why would system need a Exchange gain/Loss Account..If your local currency is INR and you posted a debit and a credit document both in INR..then there is no question of a foreign exchange gain/loss account..
BUT, if you have posted the document in any currency other than INR, ie: your local currency...then the system would need a exchnage gain/loss account when you try to clear the debits and credits.. i am giving an example below to explain better..
You posted a debit of 100 USD @ 40 = Rs. 4000.00
You posted a Credit of 100 USD @ 42 = Rs. 4200.00
Now, if you clear this debit and credit then there is no difference in 100 USD, as the debit and credit is netting off.. but if you see INR there is a difference of Rs. 200.00 which system posts to Exchange gain/loss account..which we maintain in OB09.
Hope it is clear to you now..
Regards,
SAPFICO.

Vendor account not picked in F110 payment run

Hi Sap Experts,
i have assigned two payment methods to vendor master X,Y,which i do payment run for X for currency USD all the documents are picked for payment and when i run another payment run same time for Y for currency INR its not picking up in payment run even all the open item s are due,
could help me to solve the issue
Laxmi

Hi,
Delete the current proposal of the payment run. Enter parameters once again. In Free selection tab restrict the currency to INR field. Run the proposal once again. If it still does pick up line items, check the following things
1. Parameters of the first payment run. Did you restrict the payment run only for the first payment method
2. Also see the dates entered in parameter tab of both runs
Regards,
radha

TDS liability line items are not picking in u2013 J1INCHLN

Hi Experts
During depositing of TDS through J1INCHLN it is not picking all line items i.e. available in Ledger (FBL3N). We came to know after reconciliation even as all line items are available in table With_item as uncleared.
We are facing this problem as the data from 01.03.2009u2026. Previously everything was working fine.
One more thing I will stress here that we have started Purchase Order based invoice verification also from this period.
Pl help ASAP.
Regards
Kuldeep Dubey

check the line of TDS is having the Business Place, if the business place is not capturng in TDS line items , then the create the substitution for Business Place & Section Code.
without business place in TDS line items you can't make the TDS payment.
Regards
Akmal

Document not picked in F110

Invoice doc: 5000000001
Due on: 12/30/2008
Baseline date: 11/10/2008
Payment terms: 50 days net due
Vendor master details:
Vendor: 241344
Payment method: E
Payment proposal Details:
Payment run on 12/29/2008 through F110 t-code
Parameters:
Identification:MTR1
Payment method: E
Vendor:1 to 99999999
Result : above invoice doc not picked
Second payment executed on same day 12/29/2008
Parameters:
MTR2
Payment method: C
Vendor: 1 to 99999999
Result: above invoice picked in proposal but not cleared giving error u201CPmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in itemu201D.
Again same executed on 30th but not picked but finally picked on 01/02/2009
My question is why document is not picked in MTR1 which has correct values.

Hi
In F110 , when ever you run Payment Proposal , it picks the invoices which are due for the Payment Run date. It also depends on the Next Run Date , Based on the Discount periods of the Payment terms.
In both MTR1 & MTR2 , check your Next Run date.
Regards
Venkat

Document not picked in f110 payment

Invoice doc: 5000000001
Due on: 12/30/2008
Baseline date: 11/10/2008
Payment terms: 50 days net due
Vendor master details:
Vendor: 241344
Payment method: E
Payment proposal Details:
Payment run on 12/29/2008 through F110 t-code
Parameters:
Identification:MTR1
Payment method: E
Vendor:1 to 99999999
Result : above invoice doc not picked
Second payment executed on same day 12/29/2008
Parameters:
MTR2
Payment method: C
Vendor: 1 to 99999999
Result: above invoice picked in proposal but not cleared giving error u201CPmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in itemu201D.
Again same executed on 30th but not picked but finally picked on 01/02/2009
My question is why document is not picked in MTR1 which has correct values.

Hi
Check the base line date for this IV - I dont think the document is overdue in MRT1 that is the reason it is not picked up (in frist payment run). It is overdue in the payment run (in January you run).
Check the invoice date for document getting picked up ( i hope it is with in the date), check the base line date for payment for payment proposal (I hope on 30th it is not overdue).
Thanks

HT1477 I am trying to install a new iPod Shuffle and my pc does not pick it up. My pc is running windows 8.1 os. I do not see that os in the list of operating systems.

I am trying to install a new iPod Shuffle and my pc does not pick it up.
My operating system is Windows 8.1 and windows 8 does not appear
in the list of operating systems.

You are referring to OFFICE 2010, not Windows XP or 7.
And which version of Windows do you have?
NEVER begin before you have a backup, ideally one you have tested and know works.
You don't really install Boot Camp, the Assistant is a partition tool utility.
You may just want Office 2008 for Mac.
If you need Office for Windows, perhaps run Windows in a VM like Parallels or Fusion.
Buy some backup drives and start using TimeMachine for one backup, then weekly backup with SuperDuper.
IF there is now a partition for Windows, all you need is to buy Windows, and I would recommend Windows 7 Home Premium (retail) which is about US$149.
Has nothing to do with free space. Office 2010 isn't to boot from. In fact, you can copy the disc to a folder (1.25GB) and run SETUP from there.

G/L account not picking automatically in PO with account ***. cat. M

Dear Gurus ,
I am creating PO manually with account assignment category M in which Consumption posting indicator is blank , when i am trying to create PO GL account is not Picking automatically , if i am giving Stock G/L account manually and creating GR in MIGO , accounting entry Posting as
22000000
Stock -Raw Material
KBS
17001060
Gr/Ir - Finish
WRX
with this accounting entries material is coming in sale order stock , as per my knowledge stock account should trigger with Tnn Key BSX. but account entry is created with KBS.
My requirement is G/L should pick automatically in PO from BSX transaction key and stock value should be hit to Stock G/L with Tnn Key BSX.
Please guide me because this scenario is new for me.
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

Dear Sir ,
for BSX I have check in OBYC there is already G/L account assign to valuation class.
Valuation Modifire
valuation class
G/L account.
001
3000
22000000
but when i have add G/L in GBB VKA , it is picking automatically G/L
but as per scenario Stock G/L should Post through BSX. which is not coming In PO. Please guide..
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

Scan not picking up AP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for