Scan rate too slow for I/O buses

Hello,
Could somebody please explain what the attached message means and how I can overcome it
Thanks in advance

Thank you for the answer. I apologize for not attaching the
image the first time. My hardware is cRIO 9014 with a 9104 chassis and modules
AO, DO, DI and AI and I am using LabVIEW 8.6.1. The concept is to control a
unit either by a touch panel (TPC 2106T) or by my PC. For this reason, I created
a project containing the cRIO controller, the touch panel and two
different vis (for now I leave the Touch panel out of the game, I mentioned it
just because is included in the project), one under the CRIO controller and one
on the PC. I also made a Library containing shared variables to obtain
communication between cRIO and PC (what I am planning to do in the future is to
set the RT vi as start up vi (in order to run always) and controlling the unit
either by the PCvi or by the touch panel vi. What I want to do now is running
the 2 vis (RTvi and PCvi) simultaneously. For the RTvi I used a timed loop with
the synchronized to scan engine selected in the input node. For the PC vi I use
a while loop with a time delay. When I am trying to deploy the RTvi I receive
the message sent in my previous post. The scan engine settings are: scan period
100sec and network publishing period 100ms. I hope that my explanation is clear
now. Please let me know if you need further information.
Thanks in advance

Similar Messages

Keyboard repeat rate too slow

Hi.
For some reason I'm unable to increase the keyboard repeat rate in Windows XP. The slider in Control Panel / Keyboard is set to the maximum, but the rate is still too slow for my taste. I've never had a problem with this setting in Windows before, so I suspect it's either a problem with the Boot Camp drivers, or some other Apple hardware related issue.
I've also tried to bypass the Control Panel and set the repeat rate through the registry. The value in HKEYCURRENTUSER/Control Panel/Keyboard/KeyboardSpeed is 31 when the Control Panel slider is at the maximum setting. Other sites have suggested that the unit of this value is "characters per second", and that it could be increased to at least 80. Unfortunately this does nothing for me, even after rebooting. Also, the current max. rate is more like 20 characters per second (which is not fast at all); I can decrease it - using the Control Panel or the registry editor - but it won't go any higher that 20/s (by my measurements).
I'm using a Mac Pro with Boot Camp and rEFIt (Leopard 10.5.1, Windows XP SP2, and Kubuntu 7.10 Gutsy). Keyboard is the new aluminum Apple keyboard, but I've plugged in my old Logitech keyboard too, same result.
Any ideas?

Hi, Warren -
If you have a reasonable size computer store (not an Apple one) not too far away, it may be worthwhile to visit it so she can sample the feel of various brands of keyboards.
One thing to consider is that the keyboard should be compatible with Mac keyboard startup commands - not all are.
I like the Macally iMediaKey keyboards - their layout is not as condensed as the newer Apple keyboards, and I like the action of the keys. In particular, I also like the fact that the keyboard has a functional power key, and extra programmable keys along the top - they're very handy for starting up commonly used programs without having to consume Fkeys.

Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

You really have a question for iPhone support here, so I suggest that you post in the appropriate support area:
Using iPhone
The experts over there will likely suggest that you use the Apple Troubleshooting Guide for iOS devices, so you might want to work your way through that before you post in the iPhone support area.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398

Firefox CONSTANTLY has a yellow bar on top of my screen nagging me to upgrade adobe flash but my processor is way too slow for that upgrade.

I am on an older computer that works just fine, but the processor is too slow for the flash upgrade, nor do I have the other system requirements. What can I do to get rid of this nagging bar? I do not mind upgrading to a lower version of flash, providing it is light on memory;but don't know how to or where to get it. I have seen some archives of older versions but they require knowledge of how to do zip files, or how to do the download as it isn't automatic. I currently have something called "shockwave flash 9.0.45.0". The names are another confusing thing. They talk about shockwave flash, adobe flash player, adobe flash; are they all the same thing?
michelle

cor-el, thanks for your input. The problem I keep having is that I can't get the system requirements for any of the flash versions except 11, the latest. I have looked on a number of sites as well as adobe. There is no point to download something that won't work with my system, and overloads my memory. My processor is a pentium 3, about 927 mhz. The service pack is 2.
Another problem I keep having is that for the older versions they keep telling me to "unzip" the file. I don't know what that means, or of course, how to do it.
Really need some help and understandable directions as am new to computers. This one works great, and I resent these companies putting me in the position of having to buy a new computer just so I can get their newest programs, which in reality are often not as good as the old ones. I cannot afford another computer.

What to do if my pc is too slow for Flash CS6? may i try (and find) older version?

Hi all
I tried the trial version of flash CS6 but my computer is too slow (less than 2 GB of RAM available) and I 'm not able to use it. i need it to make animated cartoons and I do not need to code in order to do it .. What do you recommend me, please? If I use an older version (which one? flash 8? is there a trial version on the site? ) it can work out ? i mean can i consider it valid for my works or is it a point against me for the market?
i want to be sure before buying the product ...
(is this the right place to ask? )
Thanks anyway
Adelina

First of all, check if your machine meets the system requirements for Flash CS6. If yo do, then i will recommend to cleanup your machine. Delete the temp files(Run->%temp%) and empty the Recycle bin.
This should also help.
Restart Windows in a modified mode | Windows 7, Vista - http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/restart-windows-modified-mode-windows.html
[Moved the discussion to Flash Pro Forum]

Scan rate and samples for FFT affecting dt

Hi,
I currently acquire data from an accelerometer and set the scan rate of the clock to 5120 S/s. I then use the Analog 1d Wfm Nchan N Samp to acquire 5120 samples and then use FFT analysis on it to create a frequency chart. This gives me a dt of 1 i.e. a resolution of 1Hz.
The question i have is how can i sample the data with a dt of 1 at a faster rate.
For example i change the scan rate to 10240 and still aquire the samples at 5120, this allows me to sample twice a second but gives me a dt of 2 (2 hz resolution) when i do my FFT analysis. All that happens by upping the scan rate for the sample clock is that i can now detect peaks at higher frequencies.
By this i mean if i just scan at 5120 S/s using my card , when i do the FFT it goes upto 1100Hz approx , if i double the scan rate, it then doubles this to 2200Hz approx, but then reduces the resolution
How can I improve the update speed and still keep a DT of 1?
Thanks
Mike
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
Unfortunately i dont think i am quite making clear what i mean
Apologies so I'll try again.....
If I aquire the data at 5600S/s and my number of samples is also 5600. When i do the FFT peak spectrol measurements my df would then be equal to 1. By this as i understand it, it means i have a resolution of 1Hz on my FFT graph/data.
This is all fine, but if i want to update the graph or indeed save the data to disk at say 5Hz how do i do this and still keep the resolution of the FFT at 1Hz??.
If i change the S/s for the clock, all this does is increase the frequency range it does its aquiring over in the FFT. i.e. if its 5600 S/s my FFT goes upto 2550Hz on its X axis. If i up it to 10200 S/s my FFT goes upto 5100Hz on its X-Axis.
Therefore if i keep the same samples in my aquiring waveform i would get it to run at twice a second if my sampling rate was 10200 and my samples were 5100, BUT my resolution would go down to 2 on the FFT chart.
How can i sample at a faster rate at the frequencies i want yet still keep the reolution to 1 on the FFT?, i almost want to set the sampling rate per 10th of a second i suppose to enable me to update at a faster rate but this isn't possible - is it?
Many thanks
Mike

Time Capsule with ext HDD seems too slow for ethernet big file transfer

With new Snow Leopard on a Mac Mini, I have a wired Time Capsule with an external WD USB 2.0 HDD added. While moving files over 802.11N files seem to work fine, a full wired Ethernet connection seems to send the files too fast for the WD external drive to keep up. I get only the first 50Mb before the transfer gets corrupted. Isn't there a handshake that limits the file transmission to allow for the USB drive to stay ahead?
Has anyone else seen this? Is there a remedy?
Thanks
Bill H.

With new Snow Leopard on a Mac Mini, I have a wired Time Capsule with an external WD USB 2.0 HDD added. While moving files over 802.11N files seem to work fine, a full wired Ethernet connection seems to send the files too fast for the WD external drive to keep up. I get only the first 50Mb before the transfer gets corrupted. Isn't there a handshake that limits the file transmission to allow for the USB drive to stay ahead?
Has anyone else seen this? Is there a remedy?
Thanks
Bill H.

Broadband Speed too slow for BT's own services.

Hello, I have recently heard that BT Sport has the rights for MotoGP in 2014.
Brilliant, I have BT Broadband, it will be free for me.
Oh wait, the required speed is 400kbps, and my BT provided Broadband is less than half of that speed!
I assume, BT will be upgrading the equipment in my area to enable me to have the required speed to view this?
I can dream... Seriously angry about this.

Well folks, I managed to find my way into BT Sport because I'm in the same boat as Tourn46, I want to carry on watching MotoGP in 2014 (but I won't pay subscription fees to anyone).
Just checked my connection speed - excellent - 8MB.
Just watched some tennis on BT Sport 2 - YouTube quality at best. BT Sport 1 even poorer and ESPN, wouldn't connect.
Hohum. No more watching those incerdible machines being wrestled around at 200mph in HD/slow motion. I think I'll probably not bother to watch. I see I could maybe get HD by paying for an Infinit package - oops, I won't pay any more so that's out. I see the BT channels come up on my Samsung SmartTV on FreeView, but I'd need a subscription box to get those- oops, I won't pay any more so that's out too.

Saying connection too slow for shareplay,but i have really good speed

i have a really good speed ,when i start shareplay with someone it says that i have very low speed.i have like 3mbps(upload) and 7mbps(download or whatever)mabey its because of the update...please fix this or help!

SharePlay can be a bit temperamental at times. The best connections can sometimes say your speeds are too sow. While the slower connections can say the opposite. It has it's moments.
Do a Test Internet Connection in the PS4 settings. Then try it again a minute later. You'll have quite different results sometimes
If it allows you to continue, then just do so. Altough your speeds may result in some poor image quality and lag for the person your SharePlay'n with

Transfer rate too slow

hi guys!!!
just wondering though...
1) just recently i noticed that transfer rate from my external hard drive to my MBP gets slower.., transferring a 150MB would take like 10mins..so im just wondering what could be done to resolve this issue...
2) and how can i uninstall program.. ( i installed the parallel and eventually installed windows XP on it, in order for me to run some window based application, furthermore, since i dont need it anymore,,, i just dragged the parallel application to the trash). is that all....what about the windows OS that has been installed together with the parallel, is it also deleted???
3) how can i increase the memory speed of my MBP?
thanks in advance guys

well it is probably because you drive is formatted in ntfs if that's the case the transfer speed is not that sexy I must admit ..try using a drive with journalled mac format and see the difference
for parallels yes the windows is gone but i recommend using clean my mac application fro getting rid of leftovers and for future installs
you can expand your memory by adding more ram or you can actually speed it up buy adding lower latenyc hyperx memory modules from kingston altho the difference won't be THAT much

ICal is too slow for practical use and crashes after it is opened

I am using an iMac G4 with OSX10.4.8. iCal is so slow that it has become impractical to use. Every click takes at least a minute to complete. Moving from the daily to the monthly view takes at least 3 minutes. I have discarded the plist file from the user library and it did not help. Any idea what is going on? Safari also suffers from the same slowness problem. I no longer use it. Have switched to Firefox.

I was having the same problem and it started after I upgraded to Tiger. After trying all the solutions, I discovered the problem with my iCal, which might not be the same for yours.
I was trying to sync with Entourage. I only had about 5 appointments on there, but once I deleted that calendar and unchecked the Sync to .Mac under preferences.
Now it runs SUPER fast. So it may be a problem with one of the calendars that you've created.
Good luck.
Thanks!

Sample rate too high for swf or PowerPoint export

Hi,
I have a few presentations that need to be exported to swf or PowerPoint. Each of the slides use audio Voice Over. The problem is that when I go to export I'm told that because the audio uses a sample rate of 48khz it can't be exported.
Anyone know if there is a way around this?
Thanks

Yes I meant to say AC3 (Dolby Digital) instead of
AAC.
Sorry for the confusion.
OK, thanks for clearing that up.
What bitrate (avg./max.) are you using for the video? With three angles, the maximum combined bitrate for each track (including audio) cannot exceed 8Mbps.

My 3 year old PC is a bit too slow for Flash 11.

Its dual core CPU runs at 2.20GHz. I expect a PC to last longer than 3 years! I have just re-formatted my hard drive and re-installed everying. Before doin that there was to problem with playing video clips. I am now finding that quite a few sites want to install flash. The previous version was lost in the re-format. Is it too much to ask to have a version that is not so resource hungry?

Finally got it to work! Tried installing from the archive before at least once. This time I logged on to Firefox as the administrator and disabled anit-virus software first. Looks like I cannot have tried the same combination before.
Discovering how to use "run as" helped. You do not start download as administrator, so it seems, but Firefox. Thanks for helping to focusing my efforts.

Service Registry too slow for runtime use ?

Hi,
I have a question regarding the intended use of the OSR for calls from EJBs to Web Services at runtime: is it true that due to performance reasons, the OSR should not be used for such lookup at runtime ?? (thus lookups should only happen as part of the partner link import at development time) ?
Or the other way around - would the following 'dynamic lookup' perform badly:
1.) the client party (EJB) contacts the OSR with a logical service identifier (e.g. 'registry key')
2.) the OSR does a lookup and returns the corresponding physical endpoint address of a WS
3.) the client party then invokes the web service on the given endpoint
Any thoughts appreciated ! Anybody using the OSR, if so, how ?

Try if disabling the automatic check for new albums will help. That worked for me:
Aperture ->Preferences -> Web
deselect: "Automatically check for newly published albums"

EDS too slow for web interaction!!!

We currently have a web application in operation that wasdeveloped under ASP/VB server technology. We utilized the VisualBasic Essbase API and the Essbase Local Client to access andmanipulate our application cubes. Works like a charm. Now our organization is being forced to convert our web applicationto a J2EE based web application. While testing the new code writingin Java and utilizing the Essbase Deployment services we weresurprise how slow this new infrastructure was. One of the classestraverses through a dimension and it took 22 minutes.UNACCEPTABLE!! I have EDS 6.5.3 configured with DB2 on an AIX server. Is there anybody out there who is developing web based Essbaseapplication that is using the java api's that can give me someadvise on what i can do to provide a web based essbaseapplication

What version of Essbase are you running? I'm currently working on a web application with EDS and Essbase7.1.3 (using both Block and ASO cubes) and I can't complain aboutmy performance. Have you narrowed it down to what method in theJava API is causing the majority of the delay?

Scan rate too slow for I/O buses

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for