Scanning for web

I am scanning back issues of a club magazine to archive on disc as well as publish or upload to the web. Files need to be searchable, but not editable. Issues average 50 pages and include text, color, and black and white photos. How do I streamline the process?

You can streamline the process, by getting the original files used to create the club magazine and not scanning. I can understand if you cannot get the oldest issues, but the later issues it should be possible and you will get a far better result.
As to issues that must be scanned. I recommend scanning each page to TIFF using the scanner program that came with your scanner. Since you want to perform OCR, probably scanning at 300 dpi should be fine. If you are willing to give up making the document searchable, then scanning at a lower dpi is possible. Touchup and cleanup any scans using a graphics program. The import the TIFFs into Acrobat and OCR the files.
You did say you want to streamline the process, but if you need to OCR the file you want your scans to be as good as possible, otherwise you can spend hours fixing up the OCR errors.

Similar Messages

How do we scan for viruses of uploaded excel file in Web Dynpro for JAVA

Hi All,
Please let me know "How do we scan for viruses of uploaded excel file in Web Dynpro for JAVA"
Regards,
Ganga.

Hi ,
pl go through this note "Integrating a virus scan into SAP applications 817623 "
SAP Virus Scan Interface
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/30/42c13a38b44d5e8d1b140794e8e850/frameset.htm
Sample Application
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6e1c4221-0901-0010-63ba-b1f9459d6e74
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f2681486-0a01-0010-8497-c778eac80da5
Regards
Ayyappparaj

Signature for web scanning

Hi, i have webserver and i want to block scan for website using IPS ( any type of scan which reveals server infomoration).
Is there any signature used, if not can i create custom signature (how i can do it)
thankssssssssssss

The only generic signature I see that is available here is 5724.0 which detects the Nikto scanner.
Many of these web scanners use specific techniques that we will block in generic web vulnerability signatures but they are not called out specifically as blocking a scanner.
For example you can try enabling the 5930 signatures for SQL injection protection.
If you want to create a custom signature, please follow this guide:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/ips_custom_sigs.html

How can scan coins for web use?

How can scan coins for web use?

Did you Google "Scanning Coins"?
http://www.telecoins.com/scanning.html
If you have a specific question after reading the (somewhat dated) article, please post back!

It takes forever to load web pages. Is it possible I have a virus, even though I keep scanning for them?

It takes forever to load web pages. Is it possible I have a virus eventhough I keep scanning for them?

Your internet experience is dependent upon several different factors. I doubt a virus is the problem.
1) when you type in an address or click on a link your service provider's computer must turn the URL into an IP address - the computer that does this is called a Domain Name Server (DNS). Many ISPs have slow DNS servers. If it takes a long time for the page to start loading but then loads quickly that might be your problem. OpenDNS provides a free DNS server that is very fast.
2) the connection between your computer and router. I assume you are using WiFi - hold down the Option key and click on the WiFi menu item in the menubar. The RSSI indicates signal strength / quality and the farther away the value is from 0 the lower the quality. something between -60 to 60 is a good signal. If it is in the 80s or higher (or -80 or lower) you might try changing the channel and/or moving the base station.
3) your internet connection. Go here to see how fast your connection is. Your connect speed will be dependant upon your WiFi connection, your ISPs internet service, and how fast the connection is between your city and the testing city. If you suspect your WiFi service is all or part of the problem you'll want to fix that before running the test - or connecting with an ethernet cable would bypass the WiFi problem. Of course you'll need a dongle (or a different computer) to test that way.
My ISP is TimeWarner and at least for a while TW was notorius for having slow Domain Name Servers. I switched to OpenDNS and haven't looked back.

Save for Web and Device Grayed menu grayed out

Using Photoshop 11.0.1 (CS4) and Mac OSX 10.5.6), I have an action that saves a retouched file first as a high quality jpg and then as a optimized jpg for the web. It has worked fine in the past, but today when running the action I received a warning that the Export command was not available. I tried manually exporting the using the Save for Web and Devices menu item, but it is grayed out and not available. The file is sized to 1024 pixels on the longest side, no layers and in 8 bit mode.
So far I have done the following:
Trashed the Save for Web preference file
Repaired permissions
Scanned for viruses
Rebooted the system
Any other ideas short of a reinstall?

mcohran wrote:
Any other ideas short of a reinstall?
Trash Photoshop preferences.
Repair Permissions.
Check on available disk space.

Save for Web... and grayscale images

I noticed a strange behavior when I use "Save for Web and Devices" on scanned BW negatives...
I import the negatives via the scanner's twain driver in Photoshop as 16bit grayscale images. My grayscale working space is normally set to the default DotGain 20% profile. When I want to show these images on the web, I use "Save for Web and Devices..." and I have selected the convert to sRGB option. For some reason, the "embed color profile" option is disabled (grayed out) when the document is in grayscale mode.
When I view the the exported image (in a color managed application or browser) it looks too dark and shadow detail is lost. Examining the file info shows that the JPG file is in RGB color space and has the sRGB profile assigned.
When I convert the image to RGB mode before I do save for web... the exported image will look exactly like it looked in Photoshop. Also, the mode change doesn't cause a change in appearance. Also, after changing to RGB, the "embed color profile" option in save for web... becomes enabled.
I experimented with other working color spaces and noticed that an image exported from a grayscale image in "GrayGamma 2.2" working color space will display almost like an image that was exported from a grayscale image converted to RGB.
I would like to understand this behavior and whether it is correct. My assumption would be that a conversion to sRGB during the export should yield the same result like a manual conversion of the image in photoshop but for some reason the results are quite different.
How can I export my grayscale images to sRGB JPG without having to convert to RGB manually while preserving the tonality from the original image?
I have attached an image which I hope might illustrate the effect I'm describing. The crop on left hand side looks as expected and is the result of exporting from an image that was converted from grayscale to RGB mode (sRGB working space) before using save for web...
The image in the middle is the result from converting to GrayGamma 2.2 color space but leaving the image in grayscale mode before saving for web and devices. It is almost identical to the crop on the left. The crop on the right hand side is the result of using save for web and devices from the original image in grayscale mode with the default DotGain 20% profile.
Thanks
/lars

These are my settings. Are they the same in your SFW dialog?

Change the default HTML template when saving for web

Hi,
Is there a way to change the default HTML output template when you go to "Save for web" and select "HTML & Images"? I would like to modify the default HTML <head> tag.
Thanks.

Two observations.
First — "Tools-> ...." is specific to Acrobat X and XI. It did not exist prior to Acrobat X.
Second — Acrobat 9 Pro / Standard (nor earlier release) does not support viewing a PDF page containing a scanned image and performing a right-click ... Save Image As.
The context menu provided by Acrobat 9 Pro with a right-click on a scanned image is:
The context menu,from a right-click with the TouchUp Object tool selected, for Acrobat 9 Pro is:
So, to paraphrase what Paul Harvey used to say ... What's the rest of the story?
Be well...

Trouble outputting for web use

I have had various problems outputting documents to Jpegs for use on a webpage. I am exporting at the standard res of 72 ppi but find the quality unacceptable when I import these into i-web. Could this have something to do with the resolution certain images were scanned or imported at? Also the text is not reproduced as crisp as expected.
I am a bit of a novice in terms of Indesign so there may be an obvious solution that I haven't considered. Any help would be gratefully recieved.
Thanks
Angerman

Hi Bob,
Thanks for your help so far. I've tried exporting the PDF then converting to JPG in PS but the image quality appears to be worse than ever! Not sure if the settings I used for PDF where suitable for web use. Any ideas on how to maximise quality, maintaining crispness of fonts?
Thanks
Anton
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:21:59 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Trouble outputting for web use
Export a PDF of the page you want to rasterize and open the PDF in Photoshop using the appropriate settings there. Save as JPG.
Bob
>

AsyncOS 6.3.1-025 and 6.0.2-017 for Web are GA

Dear Cisco IronPort Customer,
IronPort, now part of Cisco, is pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) of the two maintenance releases of AsyncOS 6.3.1-025 for Web and 6.0.2-017 for Web to all customers. These releases applies to all our Web Security Appliances (S-Series).
Enhancements and Fixes in AsyncOS 6.3.1-025 for Web
Partial list of defects fixed in 6.3.1-025
* Fixed: Web Security appliance spontaneously reboots due to a slow memory leak when clients used NTLMv1 authentication in some cases. [Defect ID: 52548]
* Fixed: Webroot scanning engine stops working when downloading some .cab files. [Defect ID: 53793]
* Fixed: Web Proxy generates a core file after a client sends a POST request to a server that returns a 503 “Service Unavailable” message in some cases. [Defect ID: 54019]
* Fixed: Web interface erroneously shows 100% CPU utilization when rate is lower. [Defect ID: 54767]
* Fixed: Web Proxy generates a core file and restarts in some cases. [Defect ID: 54890]
* Fixed: Web Proxy generates a core file and restarts after processing some HTTPS requests in some cases. [Defect ID: 55407]
Enhancements and Fixes in AsyncOS 6.0.2-017 for Web
Partial list of defects fixed in 6.0.2-017
* Enhancement: Added support for NTLM proxy authentication against Windows 2008 Server R2. [Defect ID: 49114]
* Fixed: Web Security appliance spontaneously reboots due to a slow memory leak when clients used NTLMv1 authentication in some cases. [Defect ID: 52548]
* Fixed: Webroot scanning engine stops working when downloading some .cab files. [Defect ID: 53793]
* Fixed: WBNP engine erroneously runs at 100% due to a memory leak. [Defect ID: 54034]
* Fixed: Web interface erroneously shows 100% CPU utilization when rate is lower. [Defect ID: 54767]
* Fixed: Vulnerability in Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates. [Defect ID: 55278]
* Fixed: Web Proxy generates a core file and restarts after processing some HTTPS requests in some cases. [Defect ID: 55407]
For further information about these releases, please refer to the AsyncOS Release Notes. The release notes are available on our Support Portal:
https://supportportal.ironport.com
If you are concerned about an issue not listed there, please contact your authorized support provider to make an inquiry.
How to Upgrade
Prior to upgrading, please read the Release Notes referenced above and save a copy of the configuration file somewhere other than on your appliance.
Once you have read the Release Notes you may log into the command line of your IronPort Appliance as the 'admin' user, and type 'upgrade', or use the WebUI upgrade functionality in the "System Administration" tab.
**NOTE** It is important that you follow the upgrade instructions available in the Release Notes. If you do attempt to upgrade and do not see the desired release version available, your appliance is likely not on a version allowed to upgrade directly. See 'Upgrade Paths', below.
Upgrade Paths
Please refer to the Release Notes for qualified upgrade paths.
If your systems are on any other AsyncOS release, you will need to perform multiple upgrades as specified in the release notes. Only the immediate next step in the upgrade path will be shown to you, with the next revision being shown once you are at the approved level.
Release Stage
General Availability (GA): This release is available to all our customers and is a recommended build to be used in your production environments.
Thank you for choosing Cisco IronPort Security Products.
Best Regards,
Jakob

6.3.1-025 is GA and anybody can upgrade. Release notes can be found on the portal.
Notifications are done in several stages so not every customer is notified on the first day of GA.
I'll post a GA announcement here on the portal as well - sorry for the delay.
Best,
Jakob

Save For Web Packs Up Again

PSE3 on Mac.
With reference to my earlier post,where I thought the problem had beem
resolved, save for web is again giving the ' can't find file' message.
As per the advice which solved the problem earlier in the week,I've repaired permissions,reset PSE,and deleleted the preference file,all to no avail.
Further suggestions gratefully received.

Barbara.....
Thanks. I'll hold off doing this for the next few days.
I'm in the middle of a deadline to scan and edit 300 negatives from a family wedding I recently attended,and whilst I can live with the 'temporary' loss of save for web,I'd hate to have a problem with PSE in general.
Malcolm.

Image capture for web-browsers out-of-the-box -- really no hopes?

Hi all,
I planned to extend user's interface for my web2.0 app with a webcam. It looks for me like JMF is the only framework, which promises a multiplatform usage for web-surfers. Therefore, I tried some JMF code and some JMF samples already. However it looks for me now like one should rather forget about the installers providing an "out-of-the-box webcam support ready for housewives". I'd wish i am wrong.
Would you believe one can really make a simple installer enabling browsers like firefox, ie, safari and opera to upload a webcam snapshot by a single mouse click?
Thank you for your hints and comments,
have a nice day,
Valery.

hi cat2014,
Welcome to the forums and sorry to hear about your sound trouble.
To check what's going on, can you provide these additional info:
1. What's the model of your lenovo unit (eg. Y50-70)
2. When you play a music file (ie. iTunes or YouTube), is the volume fluctuating but there's no sound comming from the built-in speakers?
- Link to picture
If the speakers are enabled and the volume is fluctuating, this means that the sound adapter is okay and there's most likely a problem with the speakers. To check, try to:
a. Use an earphone or an external speaker and observe if you can hear a sound
b. Press the Windows Key +X and choose Device Manager. On the Device Manager window, navigate to Sound, video and game controllers and uninstall the sound adapter (ensure that you delete the device driver). When finished, do a scan for hardware changes. Windows will now use a generic sound driver and observe if you can how hear a sound from the built-in speakers
Let me know how it goes.
Regards
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Stair-stepping artifacts when exporting H.264 426x240 video for web

I'm trying to export a 16:9 video clip for web using H.264 compression at 426x240 resolution from compressor using square pixel aspect ratio. No matter what bit rate I set it at -- 600kbps-6,000kbps I still get these really jagged edges. Even though my source is DV, the original file does not have anything close to this; also I have never had this issue before. One other thing to note is that if I export at full resolution H.264 -- 640x360, I don't get any stair-stepping.
Here is a frame grab of the video with the problem:
http://salsunproductions.com/misc/crapy_artifacts-h264-frame.jpg
You can download a video clip of it here (data rate is around 600-700kbps):
http://salsunproductions.com/misc/crapy_artifacts-h264.mov
I'm also noticing some sort of horizontal lines in the artifacts?? This is progressive scan footage shot on a DVX100B 24pA (and captured properly w/2:3:3:2 pull down removal, the original file doesn't have this)
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. This is getting really annoying having to export huge files...
PS: I'm using Compressor v3.0.2

It could be some scaling artifact. Make your stream progressive using frame controls (stay away from the best setting) and that should help.

AsyncOS 7.0.0-819 for Web is GA

Hello,
Cisco is pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) of a new major release of AsyncOS 7.0.0-819 for Web to all customers. This release applies to all our Web Security Appliances (S-Series).
Please be advised that AsyncOS 7.1 for Web is expected to be available shortly. This release will contain all the functionality contained in 7.0 plus support for advanced reporting and tracking as well as support for centralized management of 7.0 features using a Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance (M-Series). If you are using a M-Series device to manage your Web Security Appliances, you may want to wait for the availability of AsyncOS 7.1 for Web.
New Features and Enhancements in AsyncOS 7.0.0-819 for Web
New Feature: Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility
New Feature: Application Visibility and Control
New Feature: Safe Search and Site Content Rating
New Feature: Bandwidth Control for Streaming Media
New Feature: HTTP Instant Messaging Controls
New Feature: SaaS Access Control
New Feature: Sophos Anti-Virus Scanning
New Feature: Transparent User Identification for Novell eDirectory
New Feature: Outbound Malware Scanning
New Feature: Application Scanning Bypass
New Feature: WBRS Threat Details
New Feature: What’s New In This Release
Enhanced: Per Identity Authentication Settings
Enhanced: PAC File Hosting
Partial list of defects fixed in AsyncOS 7.0.0-819 for Web
Fixed: Access log entries are not written when custom fields use incorrect syntax [Defect ID: 72682]
Fixed: Gateway Timeout errors occur for certain websites when HTTPS Proxy is enabled [Defect ID: 70547]
Fixed: AsyncOS does not send compressed access logs to a remote server using FTP or SCP [Defect ID: 68332]
Fixed: Web Proxy does not query all LDAP groups in some cases [Defect ID: 65977]
Fixed: Web Proxy performance is slow with some complex configurations [Defect ID: 54720]
Fixed: Application fault occurs when accessing an Access Policy with a non-existent Identity [Defect ID: 54676]
Fixed: Web Proxy creates invalid cookies for requests to hostnames belonging to some particular top-level domains in some cases [Defect ID: 49758]
For further information about this release, please refer to the attached AsyncOS Release Notes.
Thank you for choosing Cisco IronPort Security Products.
Best Regards,
Eduardo

Hi,
I need to upgrade the AsyncOS of WSA from version 6.0.1 819 to 7.0.0 819.
In case the upgrade fails, I'd like to know if there is a way to roll back to an ealier version of AsyncOS.
Thank you

Scanning for viruses on Mac

I'm interested in scanning for viruses, not to protect my Mac but to avoid sending them to others. I've read a little about ClamXav and would like to hear from those of you who have used it. I don't want to run it continuously, but instead do a periodic system scan. Is it suitable to use like this? Any tips, benefits, or drawbacks you can tell me about? Thanks.

Hello ha:
I am certainly not trying to dissuade you from helping others (I try to do that myself). However, anyone who runs a Windows box without A/V software, firewall(s), moats, and boiling oil on the ramparts is asking for it. The only way you would send a virus out would be an E-mail. If you open a web site that has a Windows virus it will not harm your Mac or go anywhere else - unless you download it and then E-mail it.
A/V software is, IMHO, a complete waste of time and resources for anyone running a Mac with OSX.
Sorry for the sermon, but I cannot imagine a Windows user without robust A/V software. In my former professional life, we ran Wintel boxes and had everything (including barbed wire) to pick off viruses. My IT people used to produce a report detailing how many viruses they intercepted and deactivated.
Barry

Scanning for web

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for