Scarp update to SL with Prd order -Confirmation

We are doing Rejection Scrap updation with 501 movt type - Plant - SL - refernce with Order (Order filed is made mandatory in display settings)
(Scrap generated  unplanned while doing production process).
Now the new requirement came like , according to confirmation process - unplanned scrap will get generated and Business want to do MB!C-501 with Confirmation and not with Order.(But confirmation field is not available in option Displat screen layout )
Kindly suggect how to proceed

In Production Process - Two type sof scrap generate
1. planned - which is maintained in BOm and update with 531 mvt type
2. Unplanned - which is booked in scrap field while doing Confirmation. Suppose my Order material broke on the way/while doing maching etc . ( No where found in Inventory)
here case 2 , that scrap mat F is also sold . So an alternative method mentioned was with 501 will update scrap material and ref made as Prd  Order Number(order mat Y).
It is fine , some how it meets the business req.BUt now they want with ref to confirmation But confrimation field is not avilable in Display screen for 501.
I know 501 is not for this , but for the business [purpose it was mapped like this .
551 will update  o cost centre and not in INV
So kindly help me to upload the scrap with 501 with Production confirmation and not with Production Order
Edited by: manu m on Apr 27, 2010 5:52 AM

Similar Messages

  • URGENT: Prob with Production Order Confirmation

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a problem with Production Order Confirmation.
    When I am confirming a Prod Order and if the components present are more than '999', then error is being thrown and Material Document Number is not being created.
    I want to split the records into 500 slots and pass them at a time for the creation of the Production Order so that it doesnt throw me an error while creating a Material Document No.
    While saving the Production Order confirmation order, it should split the records into 500 slots each and then create Material Document No for each slot.
    Can anyone please help me out in this regard, how to solve this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Harish Kalla

    Hi Harish,
    This problem is addressed in OSS Note : 36353
    The Symptom reads like this
    ==========================================================================
    When you post documents using the AC interface (from SD, MM or other applications), items appear in the FI document which are identical in all or in almost all fields.
    This can also cause error message F5 727 ("Maximum number of items in FI reached"). The system issues this error if more than 999 items occur in an FI document.
    ===========================================================================
    This Note is an elaborate one..
    Hence, go through this and ask your FI Consultant to help you in this regard.
    All the best..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Tray selection of printer doesn't work with printing order confirmation

    Hello,
    When we try to print output for the order confirmation document (BA00 and custom ZBA0) on a different paper tray (e.g. tray 2 for printer avbekyo-01_tray2 in SAP R/3) then the ouput is printed to tray 1 in stead. We have defined two different printers in SAP for the tray selection. We tested the ouput on different printers, besides the avbekyo-01 and went wrong on the others also. When we print out an invoice (ZRD0) to the printer on the second tray, the invoice is printed correctly from the second tray. With an ABAP developer we debugged the print process, but no code leads to the fact that the output for the order confirmation should be printed to the first tray, while the second tray was selected in the output record. In the code still the second tray is processed, but printed on the first. The only difference we can find is that the order confirmation is SAPScript and the invoice is a Smartform. Does anyone know a solution?.
    Kind regards

    Unfortunately the setting doesn't resolve the problem. We also have activated the settings of Tray2 in the option Tray Info.
    Edited by: Chantal Polman FUNC ACCOUNT on Jun 4, 2008 2:32 PM

  • Schedule line date is not updating in line with P.O confirmation.

    hi,
    when sales order created for individual requirements it automatically creates P.R and this P.R is converted to P.O.
    whenever this P.O is updated with confirmation category like acknowledgement or inbound delivery it should update Sales order schedule line for the delivery date. but this is not happening, what is the configuration required for this.
    Kindly reply.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

    hi,
    when stock is not available then the customer order is booked as special requirement and P.R created against that order. Then the P.R is converted in to P.O and P.O is updated by O.A or Inbound delivery but the delivery dates from O.A or inbound does not update the sales order schedule line.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

  • Issue with process order confirmation

    Hi,
      I m doing the testing of SAP EHP4 To EHP6 up-gradation. I tried to confirm process order XXXXXX with T-code COR6N.
    In this process order there 2 phase for 2 activity. Now when I entered the order in COR6N I click on enter its automatically taken 2nd phase.
    Its by-pass the first phase. I have to confirm the 1st phase but its not showing.
    Please let me know where is the problem ...what configuration i m missing.
    Thanks,
    Anurudh

    Hi PP guru,
    Thanks all of you replay my problem is resolve now. 2nd phase not showing there because confirmation is possible but not necessary so when I click on f4 its not showing.  I entered it manually after that it taken it and showing activity also.
    So thank u friend once again.
    Thanks
    anurudh

  • Service GR link with Production Order confirmation

    Dear PP Experts,
    My scenario is like this ,
    With respect to service one annual contract will be there & one release Purchase Order for one month will be there.
    I want to take this service with Service GR from Service Entry sheet in a particular operation of a production order.
    Is it possible to get the service entry sheet during confirmation of production order of that particular operation.
    Please any one can give some idea.
    Thanks & Regards
    Aniruddha Biswas

    Hi ,
    It is not possible in Standard SAP . But I can give you some insight for custom development
    1) Create Contract
    2) PR can be created from the Prodn order with reference to contract.
    3) Instead std confirmation , use the custom program for confirmation , which will carry out a)creation of the purchase order b) service entry  and finally confirmation.
    There is functionality in Plant Maintenance that creation of PR is possible wrt to Frame work purchase order and service entry is done for a PR directly without Purchase order. But this functionality is not avl for the prodn order.
    I don't know how far this is useful for you.....
    Regards
    Mani

  • 10.9.2 update sleep issue with NEC monitors confirmed

    After updating from Mac OS10.9.1 to 10.9.2, both my friend, who lives in another city, and I find that attempting to put our MacPros (2010, think his is a 2009 model) attached to a NEC PA 301 (mine) or PA 271 (his) series pro monitors to sleep experience a frozen screen and cursor followed about a minute later with an expected and desired sleep mode. My computer does something slightly different than his in that the background of the dock turns a golden yellow when the screen freezes. Both systems start up from sleep correctly.
    If I only use my Apple 30 inch Cinema Display, the sleep mode works as expected.
    Spent two hours with Apple Care (level one and level two) people that didn't have a clue what was going on. Called NEC and they had no explaination.
    Any thoughts of wisdom of what is going on with the sleep issue that occurred right after we put the 10.9.2 update?

    Andrew,
    This is not an AppleCare issue, it is an Apple bug that you didn't want and  will be addressed by AppleCare representatives. Your are helping out the communnity.  If they don't believe you, refer them to this discussion. They never tell you about the 90 day software exception clause for free techsupport when one updates to a major MacOS change. I found that sending in a known bug where many people are experiencing it through AppleCare where they end up uploading your OS data to their engineers gets more attention than going to Apple.com/feedback. The more people who report it, the quicker it gets addressed.
    As far as going back to 10.9.1, didn't you do a back-up before you did an Apple "fix" that you can go back to? My problem is that every day my calendar, documents, email, etc change a lot so I am reluctant to go back to my back-up which I hate to say is only on TimeMachine now. My other backups (mirror copies) occur nightly and I didn't notice this bug till a day later.
    You pay good money for only quality equipment so a wierd bug like this should not occur on a little update.
    I have reported this to Apple and NEC but need others to light a fire under those in charge to make a change and not have us wait for one or two updates later.
    If you want to request NEC to jump in to getting this fixed, send a message to the NEC monitor product manager (Art Marshall): [email protected]

  • COPA update of KAUFN with purchase order number

    Hello
    After SAP upgrade from 6.00 to 6.04 the purchase order is no longer displayed/saved in field KAUFN and KDPOS in the profitability document. So far this functionality has worked perfectly for stock transfer orders.
    I have search for SAP notes without success - hopefully someone can help me :o)
    Thank you in advance!
    BR
    Søren Kirch

    Hi,
       During the upgrade note 321099 would have become part of the standard
    1.) note 321099 avoids that the AUBEL will be transfered to COPA as sales order number in case of a business transaction where AUBEL is NOT the sales order (e.g. if it is a purchase order)
    This will avoid an error message when you display a COPA document which contains such an "unvalid" sales order number.
    2.) You set back this logic in exit USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP in include RV60AFZZ by the lines
      if tkomp-aubel is initial.
         tkomp-aubel = xvbrp-aubel.
         tkomp-aupos = xvbrp-aupos.
      endif.
    This will copy the field AUBEL always to COPA as sales order number (KAUFN).
    regards
    Waman

  • Update Process Order Confirmations Back to SAP ECC

    Hi,
    Is there a document or step by step guide which explains how i can update  SAP EARP with process order confirmations from my shopfloor?  Below is the scenario i am looking for help in
    1. There is a SQL server table where the SHOP floor update the quantity manufactured against a Process order.
    2. I need to pick up that data from the SQL server table and update the ERP against that Process order.
    Can any one explain how this can be achieved.
    I checked the sample's and the templates in SDN but none of them actually show how to update any ERP?
    Please advice!!.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Check this one
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60ac6bb8-a684-2b10-208d-b90883004a5e
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/downloads?rid=/library/uuid/204a13d0-399d-2b10-ec84-9c254cd7efd4
    You use this component to enable the shop floor operators to record their production order and process order confirmations using a touch screen user interface. In SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) operators must complete many steps to confirm orders. Instead, you can use this interface, on a touch screen to enter the production performance easily and effectively. You can also use this component to obtain operators' work lists and information on their current activities.
    Regards
    Ram Upadhyay

  • COGI error generated while collective order confirmation

    hi ALL, this is the real  task for all PP GURUS.
    the issue is related with collective order confirmation.
    client is using customised program ZPP_CONF to confirm the collective order which is based on the sap spro program CORUPROC.this include automatic goods receipt,backflush & actual cost update .as user use zpp_conf for confirmation all this actions happened in backgruond.
    now after using ZPP_CONF . the confirmation is not happening .instead of that it is going in COGI where they are getting a error massage which is as follows
    "You have no authorization for this transaction with movement type 101u201D
    this error continues for 10-15 minutes after doing refresh it goes. & confirmation happens.
    this is not happening for all orders but for 8 out of 10.
    users have proper authorisations.
    they have enough stocks in st. locn.
    they are loosing lot of time becuse of this.
    HOW CAN I RECTIFY THIS ERROR GURUS?
    when i search i found this is written in the CORUPROC documentation
    Incl. incorrect goods movement: Not only preselected but also incorrect goods movements that are usually processed with transaction COGI are  selected and processed. 
    VENKADESH

    Hi,
    The Program CORUPROC only can adjust the Errors in Goods movements. It can not handle the Table Locks..
    The Program CORUAFWP, can taek care of table locks also, apart from the Errors in Goods Movements.
    Refer below thread for similar type of problem..
    COGI errors
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Order confirmation received

    Email received with an order confirmation on 1/31 and it stated I would receive a follow up email within 24 hours with order status and information on how to download.  Still waiting 4 days later, just wondering if they have system issues.

    Downloading Adobe apps on the cloud...
    You need to log into Explore Adobe desktop apps | Adobe Creative Cloud Download Center
    Select the app you would like to start with
    The Creative Cloud manager will install first.
    When done installing, the Creative cloud (adobe manager) should open in the middle of your screen.
    If no apps automatically start installing then click on Apps
    Scroll down to the app you want to install and click the install button
    Once the manager says it is done, you can start your app like you normally do with any other app.
    If for some reason the manager does not download and install you can access the manager at the following link:
    Adobe Creative Manager
    https://creative.adobe.com/products/creative-cloud

  • Problem with creating Process order confirmation using BAPI

    Hello,
    While creating Process Order confirmation using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, material document is getting created. But a line item is inserted in the table AFRU without material document number. When it is created manually using the transaction COR6, the table is getting updated with material doc in the line item. Can anyone let me know what other attributes to be passed in order the update the same?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards, Senthil G.

    Hello , I am working with the same Bapi, can you please send me the code to fill the parameters, if I find the same error like you, I will send you the solution if I correct that.
    Thanks for your help.
    [email protected]
    Guatemala, Cempro ADATSA

  • Measuring point update by production order confirmation

    Hi friends,
    I created a prt as equipment and assigned it to the routing. I created a production order and when i confirm the same i am getting following error as:
    Document MeasUnit has a different dimension to the characteristic unit
    Message no. IR071
    Diagnosis
    The measurement unit on creation of the measurement document must have the same dimension as the measurement unit of the characteristic of the measuring point.
    In this case, the measurement unit % does not suit the character unit EA of the measuring point 103.
    System Response
    Processing will not be continued.
    Procedure
    Use the possible entries help.
    Please suggest the solution.

    Hello Sir(s)
    i have gone through entire post for the subject related to measuring point auto update from production order confirmation.  I have tried the same but i dont know what i am missing.
    if i put some value like 1 or 2 and appropriate UOM then only my measuring document is being updated with the same value not with the actual confirmed quantity..  i have already maintained standard formulla in prt view.
    my basic requirement is to get actual value of produced quanity as counter update. means if 20 pieces have been produced and confirmed in co11n, then counter must bhe updated with the value of confirmed quantity.
    please advice what value should i put as usage in routing master to get actuall counter update.
    Will Highly appreciate your quick reply.
    Snapshots
    Regards.
    Mohammad.

  • Confirmation of Prd order

    Hi Friends,
    While i am tryinhg to do confirmation of prd order, i am getting this error  "No prices could be determined for object Activity type 1000/9999/xxxxxx"
    I am maintaining the prices in KP26 for the above activity.
    While i am trying to save the confirmation the error message saying " Confirmation terminated due to incorrect actual costs".
    Please help me to resolve this.

    closed

  • PM Order Confirmation create actual posting in Cost Center, with CE type 43

    Dear Expert,
    I would like to know the business flow of Plant Maintenance that impacts cost center reporting.
    During PM order confirmation, it will create an actual posting in Cost Center from Cost Center Reporting (No FI posting), say CC Operation, with Cost Element type: 43, which is attached with the activity type of Labor Cost assigned the the PM module.
    Example: Cost Center: CC Operation, Cost Element: 840001 (CE type: 43), Amount: USD 100- (negative sign)
    My Question:
    How does this posting (currently is in controlling only) in cost center Operation with Cost Element type: 43 be reflected in my FI reporting?
    Let say there is an FI posting of labor cost in CC Operation, amount USD 100, then from Cost Center Reporting, it actually offset both amounts, and this cost center become 0 in amount.
    Kindly advise the concept of Plant Maintenance.
    This seems like same with the concept of KB21N.
    Thanks.

    Hi Karthikeyan,
    My issue and concern is similar to the issue raised as follows:
    Secondary Cost Element Configuration for Plant Maintenance Order
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3488730
    In this forum, it says that the posting in CO, during PM order confirmation is ...
    +10 for Order and -10 for cost center A
    After PM Order settlement:
    -10 for Order and +10 for cost center A
    From the cost center and PM Order CO report, they are 0 in value ...
    Is this the correct way?
    Thanks,
    -Chin

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there anyway to use the ipad2 as a bluetooth headset?

    Well that is my initial question. i have well searched the internet for the answer but haven't found anything really relevant to my search. i have a few tablets in my house for my kids, visitors, and for my wife and me. This question arose when i con

  • A word of thanks to the iTMS podcasting team

    I'd like to express my appreciation, admiration, and make an apology. First appreciation: Those of you responsible for putting the podcasting feature in the iTMS deserve a BIG thank you! As a producer of podcasts, we have received thankful feedback f

  • Profit Center is not reading the data...

    hi all, When I assigned each Cost center with a profit center and posted costs through in FB50 to cost centers and was trying to check the data in KE5Z, system displaying the message that 'No data Read'..... Why it is soo.. Thank you.. Suresh

  • Is it possible to detect change of date and/or resume from standby?

    Hallo you all, in our current project we have a java remote application and a server application connected via GPRS. Both client and server must have a system time sinchronized with a tolerance of maximum 15 minutes. The problem has been solved simpl

  • Cannot open layers in trial of elements 10...help

    Hi, I am unable to open layers in the trial version of elements 10...is this correct and if so it's bloody useless as a trial as i want to use it for smart filters with viveza...any ideas...thanks!! angus