SCCM - software updates deployment.

Hi All,
i have adobe acrobat version 10.1.10 installed on my mahcine, when ever i am trying to up deploy an Adobe acrobat 10.1.13 for my machine using but its not gettin updated. Also , one thing that i have seen is even after deployment it is not showing up under
deployment package.
Can anyone help on this, Iam using shavlik higher version of SCUP with SCCM to achieve this.
Rsg,

Hi,
You could troubleshoot software updates deployment by checking logs.
UpdatesDeployment.log
UpdatesHandler.log
WUAHandler.log
%windir%\WindowsUpdate.log
For more information:https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh427342.aspx#BKMK_SU_NAPLog
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

  • How to find who modified Software Update deployment in sccm 2012

    Hi,
    How to find who modified(Date & Time) software update deployment in SCCM 2012 ?

    In the Console :
    Monitoring / System Status / Status Message Query
    Right Click : "Deployments Created, Modified, or Deleted" - Show Message and select your period.
    You'll have your information there.
    Benoit Lecours | Blog: System Center Dudes

  • Change Software Updates deployment priority

    Hi
    We use SCCM 2012 R2 CU2.
    whenever a new client is being installed and registered it gets its policies and deployments.
    our problem is that there are many software updates that being deployed and it takes a very long time until they finish their installation.
    while what is more important for us is the clients to get software deployments
    before the software updates.
    I know I can change packages priority but as I understand - it only changes the priority between the software packages.
    is there any way to make the software deployments to be installed before the software updates for new clients?
    even if there's no build-in solution, I'd be happy to get a friendly workaround.
    I thought about auto-adding the clients to a software update deployment collection only after all the packages are being deployed, but maybe some of you can come up with something better
    thanks!

    You can't prioritize in policy for a client. The first policy that arrives is the first that's being served..
    If you're talking about the first thing after the OS deployment, then I would try to update my clients completely during the deployment already. That would solve your problem already. In that same scenario, you could also think about installing
    computer or user targetted applications during the task sequence. For examples about both scenario's see:
    Computer-targeted:
    http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/post/install-computer-targeted-application-during-os-deployment-via-powershell-and-configmgr-2012/;
    User-targeted:
    http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/post/install-user-targeted-applications-during-os-deployment-via-powershell-and-configmgr-2012/.
    If you're not talking about an OS deployment, your only option is indeed to add the clients later to the software update collection(s). In that case you could also try to automate it via PowerShell by using the
    Add-CMDeviceCollectionDirectMembershipRule.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Software Updates Deployment Evaluation.

    Hi,
    I would like to get some clarification around the Software Updates Deployment Eval. cycle. (SCCM R2 CU3)
    Example scenario:
    I have a Software Update Group that contains 200 updates. This SUG includes updates that are prerequisites for other updates in the same SUG. So, when scanning occurs. Only one of these updates are at that particular time considered applicable.
    The software update deployment deadline is reached. The update is installed, as expected. The then agent reports  compliance against the update deployment.
    Then comes the Software Update Scan schedule, when a new scan is made against the SUP more updates are now detected as required because of the previously installed update - from the same SUG which are deployed.
    This leaves me in a situation where the agent is compliant against the Software Update deployment and non-compliant in regards to the actual Software Update Group. 
    I can of course just hit the schedule for Software Update Deployment Evaluation manually on the agent or simply do something (adding an update or whatever) that modifies the actual software updates deployment policy. This would in turn cause a new evaluation
    to occur at the client.
    Bottom line. Is my conclusion correct or have i missed something here? 
    If i'm correct, a good thing would be to add scheduling options available for the actual "software update deployment evaluation".
    That would really come in handy in situations like above scenario. 
    Br,
    Chris

    The next scheduled scan cycle will pick up the newly applicable but non-compliant updates in the deployment.
    However, note that update compliance at the client level is done against the entire update catalog as this is actually done by the Windows Update Agent (WUA) which knows nothing about ConfigMgr. Thus, the fact that an update is in a deployment or not is
    completely irrelevant as far as compliance and compliance reporting goes (which is part of the reason why compliance reporting in ConfigMgr is tricky).
    Updating the policy of an update deployment will kick off a scan cycle (just like creating a new deployment will) on the clients which is why you are probably seeing this behavior as addressing the scenario.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys
    Thanks Jason,
    What you are describing exactly matches the point I’m trying to make here. There is no correlation what so ever between update scans and actual software update deployments. The logic just isn't there. Which is a logic that is lacking
    – in my opinion.
    I really do think there is room for improvement here.
    Case:
    A customer wants to minimize the spread of reboots (a maint. window overnight should be sufficient for the agent to get the server fully up to date). The admin – who also wants to minimize effort in regards to worrying about MS bundling\prereq
    requirements – simply wants it all to be taken care of by the updates deployment agent.
    Example:
    Software update deployment contains required updates as well as updates that will not be detected as required - until the deployment has been run – and a new update scan cycle has taken place.
    The server reboots and updates deployment agent says all is fine – with regards to the deployment in it's current state, of course.
    But it's not.
    The server then issues a new scan (maybe 4 hours later and way behind the end of the maint. window) according to the software updates scan schedule, and suddenly 10 more updates are applicable, but still within the same deployment.
    What happens? Nothing, sadly. Next maint. window? Nothing.
    Not even a (client agent set – and scheduled) software update deployment re-eval takes care of this since – according to my findings – the deployment will never really be evaluated against again without administrative intervention.
    Suggestion:
    Whenever a software update deployment has been run, succeeded and passed the "after reboot" detectjob. Initiate a new evaluation of this deployment in full – of course including a pre-eval software updates scan. Just add
    a few steps to the logic of updates deployment.
    Evaluate.
    Apply.
    Initiate a new scan.
    Re-Evaluate.
    Apply again (if needed)
    Reboot
    Initiate a new scan.
    Re-evaluate
    Isn’t this the way WAUA has always worked? Why shouldn’t this method be adopted here as well? Why should ConfigMgr not honour the procedure?
    Result:
    Administrative relieve. Since I know that a software update deployment will always do the job, in full. No need for manual triggers or policy modifications.
    Caveats:
    I do realize the fact that – if this would be the scenario - the admin sometimes will not be aware of what might happen during the nightly maint. window since he cannot solely rely on compliance data.
    Anyways:
    This should at least be a deployment option in future releases.
    "Force rescan and deployment re-evaluation after first run." Simple.
    Would make life easier and keep the spread of reboots concentrated to one night and to a minimum. (Given the appropriate length of maint. windows of course)
    Consider things like KB2919355 and how WUAU agent handles that against Windows Update.
    Br,
    Chris

  • How to troubleshoot Software Update Deployment Errors

    Hi Guys,
    Could you guys please help me to troubleshoot 'Software Update Deployment Errors'. I have been trying to troubleshoot the below mentioned errors but I am not sure what step should I take for each different errors.
    Could you guys please help me stating what kind of troubleshooting steps should we take for such update deployment errors.
    Many Thanks,
    Chandan

    You would have to examine client-side logs like UpdatesDeployment.log, U*.log in general, ScanAgent.log, WUAHandler.log, WindowsUpdate.log and CI*.log.
    Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

  • SCCM Software Update Report

    Hi
    How can I make a report by sccm from installation of updates security and critical Microsoft productions?
    Best Regards

    Duplicate post of
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/bd4ab8df-c94d-4a6e-833a-d0916c65a1fc/sccm-software-update-report?forum=configmgrgeneral
    http://www.enhansoft.com/

  • How to calculate the compliance for an software update deployment

    Hi All,
    I am trying to find as how do we calculate the compliance for an software update deployment.
    Scenario, We have about 4000 machine in the domain. but we have some stale records in the domain which is about 1200. The AD cleanup for the stale records is planned for sometime in March.
    So total number of machines in a collection (including the stale machines) are 5200.
    The current compliance of that deployment shows the following status:
    Complaint : 1156
    In Progress : 1724
    Error : 38
    Unknown : 2462
    And in the unknown, we have :
    Client check failed/Active: 2
    Client check failed/Inactive: 6
    Client check passed/Active: 732
    Client check passed/Inactive: 1722
    Can you please suggest in understanding the formula that should be followed to get the compliance.

    Your Compliancy, should be based solely off of the number of computers within CM12.
     There are no “if”, “and” or “but” able it.  This is the only way to truly and reliably provide numbers to management.
    Again it should be very simple calculation:
     (Total outstanding  Security SU, Total outstanding
     Critical SU, Total outstand Service packs, Total outstand Update Rollups, Total outstand Updates, Total outstand Definition Updates, Total outstand tools, Total outstand Feature packs) Vs Total applied SU (all Classifications)
    Or
    Total # of 100% patched PCs vs Total # of PCs as seen by CM12.
    If you use any other calculation then you MUST include a disclaimer that you are filtering out computers because they might be invalid. Or you MUST define exactly how you are calculating the number. Therefore any compliancy rate that your calculate maybe
    invalid too or at least it will change once you clean up AD.
    I will never hide low compliancy numbers to management, I will always show it to them.
     In many case I will ask to give a presentation to Management to explain why the numbers are so low.
     Provide them with a list of action items that need to be done in order to bring up the number to more reasonable level. I also set their expectation on what a reasonable level is.
    100% is unachievable; there is no exception to this!
    95-99% Very excellent but expect to spend lots of $$$s to obtain these percentages.
    90-95% is really, really, good; expect to spend $$s in this range.
    85-89% is good; expect to set strict procedures
    81-84 is ok but you could do better
    Below 80% is bad
    In your case, I would start by saying AD is dirty and need to be clean up, this has been schedule for March 2015. I would follow up this to say, in order to keep AD clean the follow procedures need to be define / updated / followed. You should also define
    exactly what you are doing to ensure that all computers are management by CM12.
    IMO these is no simple answer of this.
    Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
    Old Blog site | Twitter:
    @GarthMJ

  • Windows Update Agent rebooting systems after Software Update deployment

    I have a software update deployment that is configured to install software updates on a collection of servers at 4:00 AM with a suppressed reboot. The updates get deployed and no reboot occurs as expected.  Then ~8 hours later WUA starts up and the
    servers get rebooted.
    There is a maintenance window applied to the collection from 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM to allow the updates to install.
    I've read a few forum and blog posts on this issue and have implemented some settings via GPO, but the reboots are still occurring.  The settings that were applied are referenced in the link below.
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2476479?wa=wsignin1.0
    Here is a snippet from the WindowsUpdate.log:
    2014-10-22 12:00:26:153 1428 8a88 AU Received AU Resume timeout
    2014-10-22 12:00:26:153 1428 8a88 AU Additional Service {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} with Approval type {Pre-install notify} added to AU services list
    2014-10-22 12:00:26:153 1428 8a88 AU Can not perform non-interactive scan if AU is interactive-only
    2014-10-22 12:02:08:512 1428 8a88 AU AU received policy change subscription event
    2014-10-22 12:16:43:463 1428 8a88 AU ###########  AU: Uninitializing Automatic Updates  ###########
    2014-10-22 12:16:43:479 1428 8a88 WuTask Uninit WU Task Manager
    2014-10-22 12:16:43:697 1428 8a88 Service *********
    2014-10-22 12:16:43:697 1428 8a88 Service **  END  **  Service: Service exit [Exit code = 0x240001]
    2014-10-22 12:16:43:697 1428 8a88 Service *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Misc ===========  Logging initialized (build: 7.8.9200.16604, tz: -0400)  ===========
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Misc   = Process: C:\WINDOWS\system32\svchost.exe
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Misc   = Module: c:\windows\system32\wuaueng.dll
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Service *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Service ** START **  Service: Service startup
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:728 1428 e584 Service *********
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Agent   * WU client version 7.8.9200.16604
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Agent   * Base directory: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Agent   * Access type: No proxy
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Service UpdateNetworkState Ipv6, cNetworkInterfaces = 2.
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Service UpdateNetworkState Ipv4, cNetworkInterfaces = 2.
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Agent   * Network state: Connected
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Service UpdateNetworkState Ipv6, cNetworkInterfaces = 2.
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:744 1428 e584 Service UpdateNetworkState Ipv4, cNetworkInterfaces = 2.
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent ***********  Agent: Initializing global settings cache  ***********
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent   * Endpoint Provider: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent   * WSUS server:
    http://Internal-WSUS.Domain:8530
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent   * WSUS status server:
    http://Internal-WSUS.Domain:8530
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent   * Target group: (Unassigned Computers)
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Agent   * Windows Update access disabled: No
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:791 1428 e584 Misc WARNING: Network Cost is assumed to be not supported as something failed with trying to get handles to wcmapi.dll
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:806 1428 e584 WuTask WuTaskManager delay initialize completed successfully..
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:822 1428 e584 Report CWERReporter::Init succeeded
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:822 1428 e584 Agent ***********  Agent: Initializing Windows Update Agent  ***********
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:822 1428 e584 DnldMgr Download manager restoring 0 downloads
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU ###########  AU: Initializing Automatic Updates  ###########
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU Additional Service {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} with Approval type {Pre-install notify} added to AU services list
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU AIR Mode is disabled
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # Policy Driven Provider:
    http://Internal-WSUS.Domain:8530
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # Detection frequency: 22
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # Approval type: Disabled (User preference)
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # Auto-install minor updates: No (User preference)
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # ServiceTypeDefault: Service 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782 Approval type: (Pre-install notify)
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU   # Will interact with non-admins (Non-admins are elevated (User preference))
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:838 1428 e584 AU WARNING: Failed to get Wu Exemption info from NLM, assuming not exempt, error = 0x80240037
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:853 1428 e584 AU AU finished delayed initialization
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:884 1428 e584 AU #############
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:884 1428 e584 AU ## START ##  AU: Search for updates
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:884 1428 e584 AU #########
    2014-10-22 12:19:29:884 1428 e584 Agent SkipSelfUpdateCheck search flag set for serverId: 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report ***********  Report: Initializing static reporting data  ***********
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * OS Version = 6.2.9200.0.0.197008
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * OS Product Type = 0x00000008
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * Computer Brand = HP
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * Computer Model = ProLiant BL460c Gen8
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * Platform Role = 1
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:416 1428 e584 Report   * AlwaysOn/AlwaysConnected (AOAC) = 0
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Revision = I31
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Name = Default System BIOS
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Release Date = 2014-02-10T00:00:00
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Sku Number = 641016-B21     
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Vendor = HP
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Family = ProLiant
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Major Release = 255
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Bios Minor Release = 255
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 Report   * Locale ID = 1033
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 e584 AU <<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {2787252C-D4B8-46B5-BB42-0C616042113C} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent *********
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent   * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent   * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1
    or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent   * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent   * Search Scope = {Machine & All Users}
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:431 1428 dae0 Agent   * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-18
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:494 1428 dae0 Agent   * Found 0 updates and 0 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 0 out of 0 deployed entities
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:494 1428 dae0 Agent *********
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:494 1428 dae0 Agent **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:494 1428 dae0 Agent *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU >>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {2787252C-D4B8-46B5-BB42-0C616042113C} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU   # 0 updates detected
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU #########
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU ##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {2787252C-D4B8-46B5-BB42-0C616042113C} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU #############
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:509 1428 d158 AU All AU searches complete.
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 AU #############
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 AU ## START ##  AU: Search for updates
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 AU #########
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 AU Additional Service {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} with Approval type {Pre-install notify} added to AU services list
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 Agent SkipSelfUpdateCheck search flag set for serverId: 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 e584 AU <<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {A3E41A4C-E9CB-4172-B6B0-99D556FB9102} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent *********
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent   * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent   * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1
    or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent   * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent   * Search Scope = {Machine & All Users}
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Agent   * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-18
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:525 1428 dae0 Misc Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\wuredir.cab:
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:541 1428 dae0 Misc  Microsoft signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:541 1428 dae0 Misc  Infrastructure signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:556 1428 dae0 EP Got 9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77 redir SecondaryServiceAuth URL: "http://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/w81/2/redir/v2-storeauth.cab"
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:588 1428 dae0 Agent Checking for updated auth cab for service 117cab2d-82b1-4b5a-a08c-4d62dbee7782 at
    http://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/w81/2/redir/v2-storeauth.cab
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:588 1428 dae0 Misc Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\Downloaded\117cab2d-82b1-4b5a-a08c-4d62dbee7782.cab:
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:603 1428 dae0 Misc  Microsoft signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:603 1428 dae0 Misc  Infrastructure signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:775 1428 dae0 Misc Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\Downloaded\117cab2d-82b1-4b5a-a08c-4d62dbee7782.cab:
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:791 1428 dae0 Misc  Microsoft signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:791 1428 dae0 Misc  Infrastructure signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:791 1428 dae0 Misc Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782\wuredir.cab:
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:806 1428 dae0 Misc  Microsoft signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:806 1428 dae0 Misc  Infrastructure signed: Yes
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:822 1428 dae0 EP Got 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782 redir Client/Server URL: "https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx"
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:978 1428 dae0 PT +++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing server updates  +++++++++++
    2014-10-22 12:19:30:978 1428 dae0 PT   + ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}, Server URL =
    https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 dae0 Agent   * Found 0 updates and 0 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 0 out of 0 deployed entities
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 dae0 Agent *********
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 dae0 Agent **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 dae0 Agent *************
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU >>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {A3E41A4C-E9CB-4172-B6B0-99D556FB9102} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU   # 0 updates detected
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU #########
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU ##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {A3E41A4C-E9CB-4172-B6B0-99D556FB9102} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU #############
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU All AU searches complete.
    2014-10-22 12:19:31:025 1428 d158 AU AU setting next detection timeout to 2014-10-23 14:19:28
    2014-10-22 12:19:36:025 1428 e214 Report REPORT EVENT: {E04012FD-8FFD-4259-96D5-A5A34127F0A0} 2014-10-22 12:19:31:025-0400 1 147 [AGENT_DETECTION_FINISHED] 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 0 AutomaticUpdates Success Software
    Synchronization Windows Update Client successfully detected 0 updates.
    2014-10-22 12:19:36:025 1428 e214 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
    2014-10-22 12:29:29:914 1428 e584 AU AU invoking RebootSystem (OnRebootNow)
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:055 1428 e584 AU Allowing auto firmware installs at next shutdown
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:102 1428 e584 Misc WARNING: SUS Client is rebooting system.
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:102 1428 e584 AU AU invoking RebootSystem (OnRebootRetry)
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:367 1428 e584 Shutdwn Checking to see whether install at shutdown is appropriate
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:367 1428 e584 Shutdwn user declined update at shutdown
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:367 1428 e584 AU AU initiates service shutdown
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:367 1428 e584 AU ###########  AU: Uninitializing Automatic Updates  ###########
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:399 1428 e584 WuTask Uninit WU Task Manager
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:445 1428 e584 Agent Sending shutdown notification to client
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:445 5788 8084 COMAPI WARNING: Received service shutdown/self-update notification.
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:461 1428 e584 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:539 1428 e584 Service *********
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:539 1428 e584 Service **  END  **  Service: Service exit [Exit code = 0x240001]
    2014-10-22 12:29:30:539 1428 e584 Service *************
    Any assistance is appreciated.
    -Tim

    Hi,
    Any update?
    Best Regards,
    Joyce
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • SCCM Software Updates (and SCUP) vs. Application Management for 3rd Party Application Patching

    Hi,
    We're getting ready to tackle the phenomena known as Java patching, and I was wondering if I could get your personal preference; SCCM Software Updates (and SCUP) vs. Application Management for 3rd Party Application Patching?
    I probably should give a little background on my environment; It's a university atmosphere, so unless it's policy, you have to ask nicely...can't tell people to do things they don't want to; multiple version of required versions of Java for what ever reason,
    which need to be identified, grouped together, and then upgrade as much as possible without breaking their old applications.
    I was thinking that Application Management probably made more sense where it is more robust, especially for removing multiple installs of Java on a single system, but Software Updates/SCUP looks like it was built for this type of patching, so I'm a bit confused
    why SCCM would have two components which essentially did the same thing.
    Your thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Bill

    For Java version management specifically you can already achieve a lot by using the Application Model in CM12.
    You can define supersedence between the different versions, just make sure to opt for uninstall of the older version when defining it.

  • Software Updates Deployment Shows "Unknown" Computers, Previously Had Compliant

    I'm not sure what is going on, but can anyone tell me why a software updates deployment would all of a sudden show all computers as having an "Unknown" status?  Previously, most computers were "Compliant" and there were a couple
    with errors.  When I went to check it (about a week after the original deployment), I found it had reset all to "Unknown" status.  This was yesterday, and now today there are a couple computers showing "Compliant" but most are
    still "Unknown".  It is not set up with ADR, so it's not (at least I don't think) looking for newer updates.  Any ideas?

    A re-evaluation of the software update deployment, which you configure in the client settings, can cause this behavior. That's why you should always use the reports for compliance checks and not the deployments node.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Can windows 8 be upgraded to 8.1 through CM 2012 Software Updates deployment?

    Hi,
    Can windows 8 be upgraded to 8.1 through CM 2012 Software Updates deployment rather than having it downloaded through Windows Store?

    The update is not available via software updates. However, if you are doing multiple updates, you can bypass the Windows Store.
    http://www.petri.co.il/upgrade-to-windows-8-1-without-windows-store.htm#
    Gerry Hampson | Blog:
    www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
    Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
    @gerryhampson

  • Orphaned software update deployment on child site management point

    Hi
    It would appear that we have an orphaned software update deployment still active on our child site management point but is obviously locked due to it's creation on the primary site. It was deleted from the primary site along with package from the DPs
    and these are no longer present. The issue is that the deployment is still active and clients are pulling the selected software updates from it although they are not getting them as they are no longer on the DPs.
    I know that you can take ownership of orphaned packages from the database but can this be done on Software Update deployments?
    If anyone has experienced this issue or knows of a resolve I would be greatly appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    It would appear that we have an orphaned software update deployment still active on our child site management point but is obviously locked due to it's creation on the primary site. It was deleted from the primary site along with package from the DPs
    and these are no longer present. The issue is that the deployment is still active and clients are pulling the selected software updates from it although they are not getting them as they are no longer on the DPs.
    I know that you can take ownership of orphaned packages from the database but can this be done on Software Update deployments?
    If anyone has experienced this issue or knows of a resolve I would be greatly appreciated
    Thanks in advance

  • Bandwidth usage details in SCCM 2007 during software update deployment

    Hi All,
    How can we know or check that how much bandwidth has been used during software update activity in SCCM 2007

    use performance monitor / performance counter perhaps
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/473bf861-6d81-4a3b-b603-2dfdbfa80c62/is-there-a-perfmon-counter-for-network-utilization?forum=perfmon
    ---Pat

  • How to Disable SCCM Software Updates on Client Workstations

    Hi,
    I have enabled Software Updates for all clients, to create a baseline for reporting. The intent was to then disable Software Updates via. SCCM Client Settings, so that our clients could continue receiving updates from Microsoft until we were ready to deploy
    updates to our clients.
    After modifying the SCCM Client Settings, the Software Update Cycles/actions removed from the Configuration Manager Client on the workstations, however the local policy on the workstation remained configured (did not revert back to Non-Configured).
    and the workstation is still looking to the SCCM for Windows Updates.
    Using SCCM, how do I get the workstations back to Microsoft for Windows/Microsoft Updates?
    TIA,
    Bill

    >I've read that you shouldn't mix SCCM and Group Policy for Windows Updates, when you're intending
    to use SCCM.
    Correct - if you are using Group Policy to manage the Windows Update settings, ConfigMgr will not be able to manage them.  You're post implied you did not want to manage updates with ConfigMgr.
    > not all of our workstations are on a domain; so that's not really a complete solution for
    us.
    ConfigMgr is designed to easily configure devices to update against ConfigMgr, not Microsoft Update, so there isn't just a check box for what you want.
    Consider using ConfigMgr Compliance Settings to manage the registry keys for the Windows Update settings you are looking for on your devices.
    I hope that helps,
    Nash
    Nash Pherson, Senior Systems Consultant
    Now Micro -
    My Blog Posts
    If you've found a bug or want the product worked differently,
    share your feedback.
    <-- If this post was helpful, please click "Vote as Helpful".

  • Configuring computer restarts after software update deployment deadlines

    I am currently testing in my environment and running pilot deployments at different sites and the way I am doing it is I create deadlines for my test workstations at each site on the Friday following Patch Tuesday at 6PM along with a restart. The problem
    with this though is that if a user takes their laptop home with them, or a workstation is powered down during the deadline, then the next time a workstation comes back online the system will get the notice to restart. 
    I know I can suppress restarts, but that will lower the compliance rate and I really do not want to use maintenance windows for workstations, because I want to reserve maintenance windows for servers only. 
    How do you SCCM MVPs and other SCCM gurus go about doing something like this?
    Thanks

    I suppress all reboots for patches .  I have a DCM rule that detects if a machine is in a pending reboot status.  I build a collection of machines with that pending reboot status DCM rule.  The package refreshes at 2:45AM each day.
    I have a recurring package deployed to the "pending reboot" collection that runs at 3:00AM every day with WOL.  The package checks to see if the machine is still in pending reboot state.  The package checks to  see if the time is
    between 3:00AM and 3:30AM.  If the machine still needs a reboot and it is between 3:00AM and 3:30AM, then the package notifies the user that the machine needs a reboot with a 30 minute countdown.  The user can cancel during the countdown. If the
    user doesn't cancel the machine reboots at the end of the timer.
    If the program is run outside of 3:00AM - 3:30AM, the user is notified that a reboot is necessary, but it does't require a reboot.  
    This works pretty good.  The user gets nagged by Software Updates that a reboot is required, so they can reboot on their own (and that clears the computer from the reboot collection when the DCM rule refreshes.)  If they ignore the reboot, then
    machines that are WOLable or on 24x7 reboot at 3:00AM.  Machines like laptops, the user just gets nagged to death about rebooting, but avoids the real problem of a laptop getting turned on just before a presentation and the user getting forced to reboot
    in front of a crowd of hundreds.  I feel like you should never ever reboot an end users computer without giving them a chance to say no.  The downside is that most other software deployments will fail when a machine is in a pending reboot state -
    so you want to get out of that situation as soon as possible.
     There are a lot of reasons why maintenance windows are impractical.  They are pretty good for servers and other computers that are on 24x7, but are not too good for computers that sleep, and are almost useless for laptops.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can someone take a look at my project and give me ideas to reduce lag/optimize it? (relatively new to flash and need help)

    Dropbox - TV_AL_Q I really need to reduce the lag happening in this project. I know practically nothing about action script except for what I've used in this project so please keep that in mind. Im going to try and break apart the grouped art so its

  • App Store, Messages and FaceTime Won't Open

    I own a Macbook Pro (15-inch mid 2010), OS X Mountain Lion (10.9.5) I was using my Messages App just this morning and all of a sudden it stopped working. I have tried opening it from the Applications Folder as well as directly from my Dock. What happ

  • USB does not recodnize ipod nano device

    Last week my computer crashed. we reinstalled everything and when we tried to plug the ipod in to put all the songs back on, it says "one of the USB devises attached to this computer has malfunstioned, and Windows does not recodnize it." what should

  • Can't arrange songs in iTunes 9

    So I created a playlist to make a cd for my friends birthday, brand new playlist and put all the songs in it I want, but it's not letting me re-arrange the order of the songs and I have no idea why. other playlists allow me too, but this one won't.

  • Pricing procedure in PR

    Can i call the pricing procedure in Purchase req for the purpose of tax calculation regds shailesh