SCCM Software Updates Reports

Hi All,
Does somebody has the idea how to build a SQL query to get software updates installation history (dateInstalled) per computer/sccmSite in SCCM reports? I would like to create a report to the management about how many patches where deployed
by SCCM and when?
Thanks!

Yes, I know this is an old post, I’m trying to clean them up.
SU install date is not actually recorded by CM07. There is the last changed date but that is not the same as the installed date. On top of that there is no way to determine which SU were deploy via CM07 vs manually.
http://www.enhansoft.com/

Similar Messages

SCCM Software Update Report

Hi
How can I make a report by sccm from installation of updates security and critical Microsoft productions?
Best Regards

Duplicate post of
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/bd4ab8df-c94d-4a6e-833a-d0916c65a1fc/sccm-software-update-report?forum=configmgrgeneral
http://www.enhansoft.com/

SCCM Software Update Reporting - Understanding the Report

I could use some help in understanding what makes a computer compliant and what makes a computer non-compliant in regards to SCCM’s Software Update reporting.
When I look at a report for a compliant computer and a non-compliant computer, I do not see the pattern which would cause a computer to be compliant or non-compliant.
Example for two computers:
For each report, every item with a check mark in the Approved column also has a check mark in the Installed column.
For each report, if there is a check mark in the Is Required column, there are no check marks in the other two columns for that row.
Yet one computer shows as compliant while the other shows as non-compliant.
So in regards to the three columns in a Software Update report, what should be checked or un-checked to indicate whether a computer is compliant or not?
doyle

Okay,
When you run a Compliance 1 report, the resulting report lists three rows:
One row for “Non-compliant”
The second row for “Compliance state unknown”
The third for “Compliant”
Drilling down into each row displays the computers that fall under the three categories above.
Drilling down further on specific computers within each category shows each update on its own row with three columns, “Approved”, “Installed” and “Is
Required”.
I have been assuming that a computer lacking approved updates would fall under the “Non-compliant” report while a computer with all approved updates installed would
fall under the “Compliant” report. (correct?)
With this assumption, I have comparing compliant vs non-compliant computer reports by looking at the “Approved”, “Installed”, and “Is Required”
column of each. But I am not seeing the pattern that would designate one computer has compliant and another non-compliant.
So it is the report (not me) that is telling what is compliant and what is not compliant.
Am I understanding this incorrectly and if so, please fill me in (details would be great)?
db

SCCM software updates reporting

we are slowly transitioning from WSUS to SCCM for microsoft updates. I used SCCM to manually update a few servers last night by making a software update group "available" to them.
I installed all the upsdates and rebooted. On the server if i open Software Center there are no more updates to be installed. If I look in SCCM under Monitoring --> Deployments...it still has these servers as "In progress" . I
completed this a day ago. Why wouldn't this be reporting as completed?
Is there a better place to look than deployments for this sort of a report?

Yes, the actual reports. Things in the console tend to lag behind what's actually going on for performance reasons.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

SCCM - Software Update reporting per computer

Hi Al,
Is there a way one can tell , by running a report in SCCM that says one particular machine is up-to-date with all the latest updates that are applicable to it.
Rgs,

Yes there is a built-in report for that. It called Complaisance #5 or #6
http://www.enhansoft.com/

Software Update reports bundled apps cannot be updated because they are associated with a different Apple ID

New MacBook Pro 15" Retina arrived today.
Software Update reports that updates are available for iPhoto and iMovie, bundled with purchase.
However, when UPDATE is selected, the error message
"You have updates available for other accounts.
To update this application, sign in to the account you used to purchase it."
I am the initial user and have no other account.

Any chance you had a different Apple ID with an earlier Mac and then it got migrated to your new MBP?
When you registered new MBP did you use the same Apple ID?

SCCM Software Updates (and SCUP) vs. Application Management for 3rd Party Application Patching

Hi,
We're getting ready to tackle the phenomena known as Java patching, and I was wondering if I could get your personal preference; SCCM Software Updates (and SCUP) vs. Application Management for 3rd Party Application Patching?
I probably should give a little background on my environment; It's a university atmosphere, so unless it's policy, you have to ask nicely...can't tell people to do things they don't want to; multiple version of required versions of Java for what ever reason,
which need to be identified, grouped together, and then upgrade as much as possible without breaking their old applications.
I was thinking that Application Management probably made more sense where it is more robust, especially for removing multiple installs of Java on a single system, but Software Updates/SCUP looks like it was built for this type of patching, so I'm a bit confused
why SCCM would have two components which essentially did the same thing.
Your thoughts?
Thanks,
Bill

For Java version management specifically you can already achieve a lot by using the Application Model in CM12.
You can define supersedence between the different versions, just make sure to opt for uninstall of the older version when defining it.

How to Disable SCCM Software Updates on Client Workstations

Hi,
I have enabled Software Updates for all clients, to create a baseline for reporting. The intent was to then disable Software Updates via. SCCM Client Settings, so that our clients could continue receiving updates from Microsoft until we were ready to deploy
updates to our clients.
After modifying the SCCM Client Settings, the Software Update Cycles/actions removed from the Configuration Manager Client on the workstations, however the local policy on the workstation remained configured (did not revert back to Non-Configured).
and the workstation is still looking to the SCCM for Windows Updates.
Using SCCM, how do I get the workstations back to Microsoft for Windows/Microsoft Updates?
TIA,
Bill

>I've read that you shouldn't mix SCCM and Group Policy for Windows Updates, when you're intending
to use SCCM.
Correct - if you are using Group Policy to manage the Windows Update settings, ConfigMgr will not be able to manage them. You're post implied you did not want to manage updates with ConfigMgr.
> not all of our workstations are on a domain; so that's not really a complete solution for
us.
ConfigMgr is designed to easily configure devices to update against ConfigMgr, not Microsoft Update, so there isn't just a check box for what you want.
Consider using ConfigMgr Compliance Settings to manage the registry keys for the Windows Update settings you are looking for on your devices.
I hope that helps,
Nash
Nash Pherson, Senior Systems Consultant
Now Micro -
My Blog Posts
If you've found a bug or want the product worked differently,
share your feedback.
<-- If this post was helpful, please click "Vote as Helpful".

Software Update report

I need to make a report for all software updates which we have not pushed via SCCM but Microsoft released it

Hi. May be this help you - in Reporting - Reports - Software Updates - B Deployment Management - Updates required but not deployed

Query for Software Updates Reports Install Date for only Some of the Installed Updates

We use the following query to retrieve a list of software updates for a specific collection and software update group. There are many cases where the installation status of a software update is 'installed' but there is no corresponding 'install
date'. Can anyone tell me why?
declare @AuthListLocalID as int
declare @CollID as varchar(8)
Select @CollID=CollectionID
from v_Collection
WHERE CollectionID='ZSV0000A'
select @AuthListLocalID=CI_ID from v_AuthListInfo
where CI_UniqueID='ScopeId_EAD5EB80-CC39-4EA2-B08F-A45BB84F1D76/AuthList_4DEAD110-5740-495E-8BD8-467A55C50A0C'
select
rs.Name0 as ServerName,
catinfo.CategoryInstanceName as Vendor,
catinfo2.CategoryInstanceName as UpdateClassification,
ui.BulletinID as BulletinID,
ui.ArticleID as ArticleID,
Case ui.Severity WHEN 10 THEN 'Critical' WHEN 8 THEN 'Important' ELSE LTRIM(ui.Severity) END as Rating,
ui.Title as Title,
Targeted=(case when ctm.ResourceID is not null then '*' else '' end),
Installed=(case when css.Status=3 then '*' else '' end),
IsRequired=(case when css.Status=2 then '*' else '' end),
Deadline=cdl.Deadline,
CAST(CASE IsNull(AddRem.InstallDate0,CAST('1/1/1900' as smalldatetime)) WHEN CAST('1/1/1900' as smalldatetime) THEN AddRem64.InstallDate0 ELSE AddRem.InstallDate0 END as Date) as 'Install Date',
ui.InfoURL as InformationURL
from v_UpdateComplianceStatus css
inner join v_UpdateInfo ui on ui.CI_ID=css.CI_ID
inner join v_CIRelation cir
on ui.CI_ID=css.CI_ID and cir.ToCIID = ui.CI_ID -- add this
inner join v_CICategories_All catall on catall.CI_ID=ui.CI_ID
inner join v_CategoryInfo catinfo on catall.CategoryInstance_UniqueID = catinfo.CategoryInstance_UniqueID and catinfo.CategoryTypeName='Company'
inner join v_CICategories_All catall2 on catall2.CI_ID=ui.CI_ID
inner join v_CategoryInfo catinfo2 on catall2.CategoryInstance_UniqueID = catinfo2.CategoryInstance_UniqueID
and catinfo2.CategoryTypeName='UpdateClassification'
left outer join v_CITargetedMachines ctm on ctm.CI_ID=css.CI_ID
and ctm.ResourceID = css.ResourceID
left outer join v_GS_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS AddRem on css.ResourceID = AddRem.ResourceID and ui.Title = AddRem.DisplayName0
left outer join v_GS_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64 AddRem64 on css.ResourceID = AddRem64.ResourceID and ui.Title = AddRem64.DisplayName0
left outer join (select atc.CI_ID
,CreationTime=min(a.CreationTime)
,ExpirationTime=min(a.ExpirationTime)
,StartTime=min(a.StartTime)
,EnforcementDeadLine=min(a.EnforcementDeadLine)
,LastModificationTime=min(a.LastModificationTime)
,Deadline=min(a.EnforcementDeadline)
from v_CIAssignment a
inner join v_CIAssignmentToCI atc on atc.AssignmentID=a.AssignmentID
group by atc.CI_ID) cdl
on cdl.CI_ID=css.CI_ID
left outer join v_R_System rs ON css.ResourceID=rs.ResourceID
where css.ResourceID in (
Select vc.ResourceID
FROM v_FullCollectionMembership vc
WHERE vc.CollectionID=@CollID)
and cir.FromCIID=@AuthListLocalID
and cir.RelationType=1
order by
catinfo.CategoryInstanceName
, catinfo2.CategoryInstanceName
, ui.ArticleID

Hi Mate,
Its really difficult to do get the installed date of the patches as there is no table available in SCCM DB to pull this info i had a requirement in the past but i was unable to do had done it via work around.
This can be done after editing of sms_def.mof file or else using the power-shell script in windows server 2008 where the powershell is a feature by default.
H/W inventory:
For the 2000 servers this has to be installed but if we enable this its mentioned it may utilize upto 100 % of the Memory during the h/w inventory you can check that in your SMS_DEF.MOF -
QuickFixEngineering you can see the warning.uickFixEngineering
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279225/en-us
Powershell script:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/richardsiddaway/archive/2011/10/23/1760058.aspx
the warning for the quick fix engineering is not there on 2012 but there on 2007 hope the info help you to achieve your output.
Kamala kannan.c| Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” or Vote as Helpful if its helpful for you. |Disclaimer: This posting is provided with no warranties and confers no rights

SCCM Software Update Agent remains disabled

Dear All,
on single notebooks the Software Updates Agent remains disabled even if the Client Settings policy is set to enale the agent as in the attached images:
Even though if I set e.g. the remote tool agent as disabled, the agent becomes disabled on the same notebooks, where the SUA does not change state. Therefore a communication error is excluded.
Does anyone know where to look after more information about this issue and eventually how to solve it?
CMClient Version on all Clients: 5.00.7804.1000
OS on the Client: Win 8 or Win 8.1 U1
SCCM Version on the Server: System Center Configuration manager 2012 SP 1 5.0.7804.1500
Policy:
Best,
Pictop

Hi t.c.rich,
Thank you for the response.
Here the log file.
<![LOG[Successfully completed scan.]LOG]!><time="12:09:30.983-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3864" file="cwuahandler.cpp:3557">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="12:51:54.966-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Existing WUA Managed server was already set (HTTP://sccm.domain.com:8530), skipping Group Policy registration.]LOG]!><time="12:51:55.045-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="sourcemanager.cpp:936">
<![LOG[Added Update Source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) of content type: 2]LOG]!><time="12:51:55.064-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1265">
<![LOG[Scan results will include all superseded updates.]LOG]!><time="12:51:55.076-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2913">
<![LOG[Search Criteria is (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Software') OR (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Driver')]LOG]!><time="12:51:55.076-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2916">
<![LOG[Async searching of updates using WUAgent started.]LOG]!><time="12:51:56.701-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4828" file="cwuahandler.cpp:579">
<![LOG[Async searching completed.]LOG]!><time="12:52:18.732-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2068">
<![LOG[Successfully completed scan.]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.513-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="1880" file="cwuahandler.cpp:3557">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.748-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Existing WUA Managed server was already set (HTTP://sccm.domain.com:8530), skipping Group Policy registration.]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.748-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="sourcemanager.cpp:936">
<![LOG[Added Update Source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) of content type: 2]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.763-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1265">
<![LOG[Scan results will include all superseded updates.]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.763-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2913">
<![LOG[Search Criteria is (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Software') OR (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Driver')]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.763-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2916">
<![LOG[Async searching of updates using WUAgent started.]LOG]!><time="12:52:19.763-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="cwuahandler.cpp:579">
<![LOG[Async searching completed.]LOG]!><time="12:52:38.998-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4768" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2068">
<![LOG[Successfully completed scan.]LOG]!><time="12:52:39.888-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2608" file="cwuahandler.cpp:3557">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="13:38:54.626-120" date="05-29-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3660" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[Removed Update Source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) of content type: 2]LOG]!><time="10:28:37.696-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="488" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1338">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="10:28:39.508-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="488" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="10:29:04.622-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2368" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="10:42:29.805-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3092" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[Tried to remove an update source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) that does not exist.]LOG]!><time="10:45:25.357-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="2" thread="3944" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1315">
<![LOG[Failed to Remove Update Source from WUAgent ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}). Error = 0x87d00691.]LOG]!><time="10:45:25.357-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="3944" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2359">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="10:46:37.231-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2540" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="10:49:55.122-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2128" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="11:31:03.370-120" date="10-10-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="1224" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="14:30:29.411-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3960" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="14:38:38.915-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2844" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Unable to read existing resultant WUA policy. Error = 0x80070002.]LOG]!><time="14:38:38.915-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="2" thread="2844" file="sourcemanager.cpp:920">
<![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server: HTTP://sccm.domain.com:8530]LOG]!><time="14:38:38.915-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2844" file="sourcemanager.cpp:948">
<![LOG[Waiting for 2 mins for Group Policy to notify of WUA policy change...]LOG]!><time="14:38:39.165-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2844" file="sourcemanager.cpp:954">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.416-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5736" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.416-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Existing WUA Managed server was already set (HTTP://sccm.domain.com:8530), skipping Group Policy registration.]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.447-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="sourcemanager.cpp:936">
<![LOG[Added Update Source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) of content type: 2]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.462-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1265">
<![LOG[Scan results will include superseded updates only when they are superseded by service packs and definition updates.]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.478-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2909">
<![LOG[Search Criteria is (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Software') OR (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Driver')]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.478-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2916">
<![LOG[Async searching of updates using WUAgent started.]LOG]!><time="14:40:06.494-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="3796" file="cwuahandler.cpp:579">
<![LOG[Async searching completed.]LOG]!><time="14:44:15.950-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="1120" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2068">
<![LOG[Successfully completed scan.]LOG]!><time="14:44:17.325-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="6180" file="cwuahandler.cpp:3557">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="15:51:02.561-60" date="01-27-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4008" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="12:50:50.102-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4444" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="14:00:00.167-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Existing WUA Managed server was already set (HTTP://sccm.domain.com:8530), skipping Group Policy registration.]LOG]!><time="14:00:00.214-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="sourcemanager.cpp:936">
<![LOG[Added Update Source ({543A840D-5C46-4239-ADB9-17E8FC7359E5}) of content type: 2]LOG]!><time="14:00:00.214-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1265">
<![LOG[Scan results will include all superseded updates.]LOG]!><time="14:00:00.229-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2913">
<![LOG[Search Criteria is (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Software') OR (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Driver')]LOG]!><time="14:00:00.229-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2916">
<![LOG[Async searching of updates using WUAgent started.]LOG]!><time="14:00:01.995-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="cwuahandler.cpp:579">
<![LOG[Async searching completed.]LOG]!><time="14:00:21.979-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5076" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2068">
<![LOG[Successfully completed scan.]LOG]!><time="14:00:23.354-60" date="01-29-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5124" file="cwuahandler.cpp:3557">
<![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="08:12:47.409-60" date="01-30-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="5084" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527">
Regards,
Pictop

SCCM - software updates deployment.

Hi All,
i have adobe acrobat version 10.1.10 installed on my mahcine, when ever i am trying to up deploy an Adobe acrobat 10.1.13 for my machine using but its not gettin updated. Also , one thing that i have seen is even after deployment it is not showing up under
deployment package.
Can anyone help on this, Iam using shavlik higher version of SCUP with SCCM to achieve this.
Rsg,

Hi,
You could troubleshoot software updates deployment by checking logs.
UpdatesDeployment.log
UpdatesHandler.log
WUAHandler.log
%windir%\WindowsUpdate.log
For more information:https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh427342.aspx#BKMK_SU_NAPLog
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

SCCM Software Update's / ADR questions

Hello Technet/SCCM community,
after much scratching of the ol' noggin and lots of internet searches I have been left with a handful of questions regarding SCCM 2012 SP1 and its Software Update Point functionality with emphasis on Automatic Deployment Rules.
1.When creating an ADR if one ADR's updates are the same as another ADR's updates how can we avoid storing/downloading duplicates? Can I store the updates in the same folder and will SCCM be smart enough to share the updates rather than having two copies?
note: one way around the above would be to separate updates into different ADR's, here is my issue with this method: lets say I have one ADR for Win7 updates and one for Office2013/Silverlight etc. Now Im deploying multiple packages to machines causes a
larger update window and possible multiple restarts. So lets say I suppress the restarts, well when users get around to it they will still see the updates being applied and per our policy we have one window to push these and when we wander from the norm users
minds break. i.e. I don't want multiple ADR's deployed to the machines a month and I do not want to suppress restarts.
2. Is there no way to only download the metadata of these updates? Currently updates for my environment are eating up 80 gigs of hard drive space. 40 gigs to the download location which then gets duplicated to the content library which sets me up for my
next question: Why are these updates in both locations essentially doubling the HD space you need for updates. My content library grows gig for gig with my SUP updates store.
3. Scenario: I deploy updates month 1, 100 updates are downloaded and deployed and update group entry is created. Next month I deploy again this time 50 updates are downloaded and deployed, update group 2 created. Questions: Now if I delete update group
1 and do not have a date released or revised rule will the next deploy grab update group 1's updates again? In other words should I always leave the update groups in SCCM so it knows what updates have been deployed and wont download those updates again. And
finally if I should leave the update groups can I still delete the updates from the folder freeing up space but still allowing SCCM to know whats been deployed?
4. Does anyone have an essential Windows 7 workstation updates ADR build they can share. For Workstations I like to deploy everything they need in one ADR, Office 2013, Silverlight, SCEP, and WIN7. So far Ive never come close to the 1000 limit. Server ADR's
are a different story.
MichaelSpaulding

I appreciate your clarification of an ADR, I understand what it does and doesn't do, I'm simply using the term ADR to cover the subjects I'm discussing.
This piece of your response answers my questions in full and is very helpful.
"You can use the "Period of time for which all pending deployments with deadline in this time will also
be installed" setting on the Software Updates tab to group deployments together that have slightly different deadline times; however, Office 2013 and SCEP updates generally don't require a reboot."
I had previously set the deadline/restart window to "as soon as possible", I will utilize
the above to resolve my issues with my ADR deployments and I will also use the below for how I group updates.
"I generally configure an ADR for all workstation OS updates, one for Office, one for Server updates,
and one for SCEP. These all reference the exact same update package which I then change on a periodic basis like every 6-12 months. I also create new update groups month for each of these (except SCEP defs)."
Thanks great stuff Jason:)
MichaelSpaulding

SCCM - software updates - Not required.

Hi All,
Can some one help with the understanding of "Not Required" software updates. How does actually SCCM decides why a particular software update is not required for a machine.
Rgs,

Hi, The detection method for if an update is applicable comes with the WSUS component so, the WSUS client which is configured by the SCCM client policy to use the SUP as a WSUS servern.
The client downloads infiormation about all updates and how they are detected from the SUP and then it sends the result to the MP that processes which updates are applicable or not into the SCCM DB.
So it it the same way the Windows Update agent uses WSUS and Microsoft Update detects which updates are applicable.
Regards,
Jörgen
-- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
@ccmexec

Software Update Reporting issue

I have deployed a software update group in a collection. When I check the deployment status from Monitoring - Deployments Node getting 78 % compliance but
if I check the enforcement deployment states from Monitoring - Reporting - Reports - Software Updates - C Deployment States - States 1 - Enforcement States for a deployment report getting all together different numbers there are only
5% computers are showing as Compliant, and rest Computers are showing in Enforcement state unknown. Please help on this issue.

Hi,
Have you reviewed the following logs on the unknown computer.
UpdatesStore.log
UpdatesHandler.log
WUAHandler.log
WindowsUpdate.log
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

SCCM Software Updates Reports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for