Sched.start date not allowing on week-ends for fwd scheduling process order

Hello Experts,
For a process order & scheduling typr forward/in time if I take sat or sunday as a start date then if I click on schedule, system changes it to previous workin day (friday). But however if i select backward/in time scheduling type & put week ends as finish day then system does not change this date.
How can I make system to allow schedule start date on week ends also for forward/in time scheduling type. in a factory calendor sat & sunday are holidays. while for work center, calender sat & sunday are marked as working days.
Thanks for advance,
Vijay.

Hi
it depends upon client requirement.you must have defined the holiday calender as well.if you select the public holidays in your factory calender.then system will allow you to do your daily transctions on public holidays as well and vice versa.so better go with all options selected .and plz check at your end
plz revert back if it works
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Similar Messages

Error AA168 Ord.dep.start date not allowed in dep.area 60 (Please correct)

Hi experts,
We upgraded to ECC6 from 4.7 version last month.
For some assets we have start deprecation date filled for area 60 with deprecation key LINV.
We would like to modify deprecation key to 0000 but we have error "AA168 Ord.dep.start date not allowed in dep.area 60 (Please correct)"
Have you any idea to resolve this issue.
Thank you in advance
Kind Regards.

Dear Shankar
here is what i have in transaction
001     01/01/02/02          01     01     02     02
002     01/01/01/01          01     01     01     01
003     01/06/02/02          01     06     02     02
004     06/06/02/02          06     06     02     02
i do not anderstand any thing in this transaction
Can you help me resolving this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards

Error in CJ88 Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)

When i try CJ88 with a wbs element, it shows the following error :
Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
Message no. AA 478
Diagnosis
A retirement was already posted on the asset 000022400733 0041 on 20091231. Based on the value date 20091231 of the transaction, this transaction should have been included in the calculation of values for the retirement.
System Response
The transaction is rejected.
Procedure
Check the value date of the transaction.
In need to put year 2009 in date of the transaction, but it isnt posible. ¿Why? I dont know very much about asset accounting...

Hi
It is not allowing for WBS element final settlement, because of your asset already retairement was done.
By best suggetion is, You will create the new WBS element and transfer the all cost line items from old WBS element to new WBS element, then you will try to settlement for another asset in CJ88.
I hope it will use for you.
Regards
PVCPVC

ABUMN-error "Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"

Hi,
When we are trying to transfer asset within company code thru Tcode ABUMN, we are getting a error as
"Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"
What actually we are doing is we are trying to transfer the previous year asset for example say 01.04.2007 assets on today.
the Parameters are as below
Document date :26.03.2008
Posting Date :26.03.2008
Asset value date is 01.04.2007.
Then the system is throwing an error and not alloing to post the previous year transfers.
Can any one help me out.
Cheers
Sri

Hi,
I think, if you give old asset value date, system will give you the error. This may be because, you are trying to transfer the assets with old values, means in your examble the dep. from the 01.04.2007 to 29.02.2008 whould have been charged.
So, give the current year date means any date from 01.01.2008 to till date.
If you read F1 help for the value date column, it states,
Asset value date
The asset value date is the value date for Asset Accounting. It can deviate from the posting and document date and be in posting periods already closed for Financial Accounting. However, the posting year and asset value date year must be the same.
Since the asset value date can have a direct influence on the amount of depreciation, the system creates a default value when it can. You can specify in Customizing how the the default asset value date is determined by the system.
Hope it helps
Saravanan.A

Adobe captivate data not sending at the end of webinar. Is the adobe server still down?

Adobe captivate data not sending at the end of webinar. Reads "unknown error." Is the adobe server still down? This has been ongoing all of july 2014.

So the engineer came and, of course, everything was working ok. He did fit some kind of RF filter on my main socket, and 'changed the pair' on one of the outside cables. Since then, I've only had a noisy line once, and seem to have been connected for 3 days solid, which is a record!
I've switched back to my BT Home hub 3, which guavas me more stats. The line has previously given me up to 6mb/s, now only getting 1.6.
Do you think, now the line seems more stable, with the stats below I should be able to maintain a higher speed now?
Thanks
Line state: Connected
Connection time: 3 days, 02:19:39
Downstream: 1.601 Mbps
Upstream: 444.9 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI: 0/38
Type: PPPoA
Modulation: G.992.3 Annex A
Latency type: Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up): 17.7 dB / 22.6 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up): 44.8 dB / 27.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up): 18.6 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up): 3144673 / 0
CRC Events (Down/Up): 14434 / 38
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up): 111873 / 10
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 1011 / 4

Waranty start date not correct

I bought a Pavillion P6-2330 "off the shelf" from the HP online store in early February, 2013. A few days after setting it up, a pop-up appeared offering to sell me an extension to my warranty. The start date shown in the pop-up for my warranty was November 7, 2012 - over three months before I received my computer. I called HP, and found out that my computer was MANUFACTURED on November 7, 2012. My warranty SHOULD HAVE started on the day in February when I recieved it. After I faxed my receipt to HP, they adjusted my warranty to the correct date in February of 2013. How many out there don't know about this, and have shortened warranties?
You can check your warranty start and end dates in the HP Support Assistant, under the Warranty tab.

Hi,
Usually warranties start at the time of purchase. I wonder if someone else had previously purchased the PC and then had returned it for some reason.
Years back, I ran into warranty issues when the manufacturer had started that warranty on the ship date. I finally got the manufacturer to change that to date received (delivered). The cost of a warranty day on very expensive equipment does add up. Additionally, the time to return the device for a refund is also shorten if the ship date is used.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

In plant parameters how the start date in past will be applicable for order

Hi All,
Can any one explain me in detail start in past for plant parmeters (OPPQ).
Regards
sailendra

Hi,
Start date of order proposals allowed in the past
This indicator defines that the system does not automatically switch to forward scheduling if the order start date lies in the past for determining the basic dates. With this indicator, backward scheduling is always used to determine the basic dates, even if the start date lies in the past.
e.g Bacward scheduling type, Today date is 08.06.2009
If u give basic finish date say 25.06.2009,and system propose you basic start date in 06.06.2009. That is 06.06.2009 is lies in past date.In this case system propose you forward scheduling.Means order basic start date is 08.06.2009 .If you don't want to system propose you for forward scheduling tick mark Start in past in OPPQ.
Hope this clear you.
Regards,
Raja.

In Sales Order Users are not allowed to change price for any material

Dear all,
Please give me the solution :
In Sales Order va02 Users are not allowed to change price for any material .

Hi Amit
If you want that in VA01 manual as well as other pricing condiion entry and cahnges to be allowed and only in va02 users should be restricted ,then you have following alternative.
Go to T.Code SHD0
Select Transaction VA02.
Create a new variant ,give suitable name.
select option change with processing.
So u can run a va02 transaction and for every screen u can create screen variant and control data entry whether required , dispaly or hide.
in this for LV69a pricing screen disable update button .
so system wont change anything updated or cahnged in pricing.
further you can create the variant transactions from this transaction variant and assign to different users as per control requirements.
I think this will help you
Regards
mandar

FRM-41009: Function key not allowed. Press %s for list of valid keys.

FRM-41009: Function key not allowed. Press %s for list of valid key.
What is reason for this message, and how can we suppress it. Where should I set the system.message_level to suppress this message.

The reason is you press a key that cannot be used, e.g. duplicate record cannot be used in enter query mode.
You cannot suppress this message, even with message_level 25. If you code this for key-duprec, you will still get the message:
:system.message_level := 25;
duplicate_record;Forms intercepts the error at a very early stage. Even this didn't suppress the message:
if :system.mode = 'ENTER-QUERY' then
null;
else
duplicate_record;
end if;

Firefox does not allow page re-directing for paypal payment

firefox does not allow page re-directing for paypal payment. How do I fix this problem. It occurs with several sites where it was not a previous problem. When I press "allow", I get returned to the very beginning of the order process.

I really appreciate your (spookily timely) help. Yes, I did try safe mode once.
The problem with testing this problem is that I have to have something in the cart to buy, and if it works I've bought it.
I was hoping to find that someone else had already done the logic and experimenting part, and the solution was just 'out there'. I did get one response (from Daz3d) that said Firefox had been having a problem with PayPal on their site, but no details.
And as soon as I buy what I need using a credit card, as far as they're concerned the problem is done.

Not allowing the change of profit center on sales orders.

Good afternoon everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has come across the need to not allow the changing of profit centers on sales orders. We do not want our CSR to have the ability to change the profit center from what is automatically populated on the sales order.
Thanks,
Matthew Fee

Hi,
Yes this is possible
Go to T-Code SHD0 and use the transaction -va01 & screen variant BUS2032 .
and go to details . Now select the field you want to use and put tick on "output only". this will refer that the mentioned fields are not while creating sales order .
Hope this will resolve your problem
Regards,
Krishna O

Error Indexing not allowed when marking indexing for document HR_DOC

Hello all,
We are able to solve the first problem. Now we have the following error
"Error Indexing not allowed when marking indexing for document HR_DOC"
Has anyone idea on how to solve it?
Thanks a lot.
Best regards,

....and thanks a lot for your feedback in resolving this issue!

Dateofbirth and start date not same for infotype 2

Hi Gurus,
Recently we have applied supportpacks for 4.6c in development.I am testing for hiring action.What i observed is end date for these infotypes changed to 31.12.1999 instead of 12.31.1999 and in infotype 2 employee dateofbirth and start date is not same which is suppose to be same.Startdate of infotype 2 is taken as employee hire date.Infotype 2 has timeconstraint 1.when i am trying to enter date of birth, for some dates it give me an error invalid date. what could be the cause?Help is appreciated
Thanks

Hi,
Please go to SU3 and check for the Date Format under the Defaults tab.
Hope this helps,
Reward points if helpful,
Thank You,

User disabled until start date not getting ROs provisioned via AP

Here's the situation: I have a user in OIM that is disabled until start date. When the start date rolls around, and the job "Enable User After Start Date" runs followed by "Evaulate User Policies," the user is correctly enabled and the correct role gets assigned but the access policy associated with that role does not appear to get triggered so the APs resources are not assigned. However, if a user is entered the same way (via HR recon) but is on or after its start date, then the role gets assigned, the access policy fires, and the ROs are provisioned just fine.
I have noticed that if a user is moved from disabled to enabled, then the membership rules fire and any roles associated with the rules get assigned but in the DB the field USR_POLICY_UPDATE remains null. If I update that field with a '1' and re-run "Evaluate User Policies," the resources are provisioned correctly.
I am wondering if anyone has seen this before or has a suggestion as to how to resolve this.
Thanks,
Stephen

Thanks for the suggestion. As it turned out, I did not have Retrofit checked but unfortunately that did not resolve the issue. The behavior remained the same after checking and re-running 'Evaluate User Policies'.
I may have a workaround for this issue that I am in the process of implementing. I'm creating a job that will run right before 'Enable User After Start Date' that will update the USR_POLICY_UPDATE field to'1' if the status of a user is 'Disabled Until Start Date.' Then the user will get enabled, assigned the appropriate roles via rules, and 'Evaluate User Policies' should run and now find this user and apply the access policies.
Anyway, seems like there should be a simpler answer so I'll keep checking here if anyone has one. I'll also update if the above workaround works.
Thanks,
Stephen

Billing Plan Start Date not copied to Sales order from Service Contract

Hi
We are developing a process of Creation of Service Contract and then a order confirmation.
Now based on the Order Confirmation will bill based on the Bill Plan.
The Bill plan start date in contract header is not flowing to Sales Order header while creating with reference.
Then navigating to Header Billing plan and if we input the date the billing plan dates are displayed.
We checked the copy control settings and seems like the date is not copied.Is this a standard behaviour.
If so then do we have any work arounds to achieve the same. Because the contract start date can change before confirmation.
So business wants a sales order confirmation to be created after contract creation and bill periodically as per the Sales order instead of contract.

Hi,
Appreciate ur quick response. But instead of FKDAT i need the FPLA-BEDAT to be flowed to Billing Plan.Right now iam entering the following date manually at header.Instead if it copies from Contract header then manual entry could be neglected.
Is it possible with the same routine to code with the above mentioned FPLA-BEDAT.

Sched.start date not allowing on week-ends for fwd scheduling process order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for