Scheduling Agreement JIT / Forecast calculating wrong

Hello experts,
I´m with a problem with JIT / Forecast.
The forecast are calculating wrong values. For example:
Cumulative quantity calculated: 584
JIT schedule:
DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
06.01.2012     00:00     32          32
10.01.2012     00:00     352          384
13.01.2012     00:00     128          512
17.01.2012     00:00     88          600              16
Forecast schedule
DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
20.01.2012     00:00     112          112
24.01.2012     00:00     224          336
27.01.2012     00:00     128          464
31.01.2012     00:00     200          664
The values of forecast are calculating by Cumulative quantity calculated that is 584 and I dont have any Open Quantity and in this case I need to have Open Quantity in Forecast.
The forecast must not be calculated by the amount in transit
Help me.
Tks
LFC

Hi ashish
Check the planning delivery schedule tab and go to item data -> delivery schedule header and check wheather any proper information has been filled or not
Regards
Srinath

Similar Messages

About selecting Scheduling Agreement and Forecast delivery schedule

Hi Experts,
i want to write a Report, with 2 parameters for the selection : Sold-to-party and Period
For this Sold-to-party/Period, I want to list all scheduling agreement + Forecast delivery schedule.
I already found the Function SD_VBEP_READ_WITH_VBELN to read all Forecast delivery schedule lines using Sales Doc.No. , but how can I select all Scheduling Agreement for the Period ?
Regards,
David

Solution:
by selecting data from table VEPVG (Delivery Due Index) and using function SD_VBEP_READ_WITH_VBELN for each SD Document.
Regards,
David

Scheduling agreement,(GR value is wrong)

I have one scheduling agreement, the price is 1.31 INR from 10.10.2007 and i made GR for this three times, it shows correct quantity and value in Purchase order history, in 18.10.2007 the one GR is showing me wrong value, per material isit, showing me 0.02 INR why?(we are putting the quantity is correct)
for the vendor and material Inforecord is existed in that, also 1.31 per item is there, and validity of inforecord is up to 9999 year.
what must be the reason,
i have checked any body changed the value are not, but they have updated that from30.10.2007 they made value 1.32 Inr per material
what are reason?
sapman

Hi,
It looks like system has posted GR with difference in price i.e.1.32minus 1.31 i.e.0.02 , Please check was there any reversal of this GR?or any scales maintained in inforecord for quantity? is the accounting document also posted with same price?If accounting doc is posted correctly then it might be an po history updation problem just check
BR
Diwakar

Schedule agreement-JIT and creation profile (are necessary to maintain)

Hi Friends ,
I am doing schedule line agreement in this way.
1) Create SA agrement -ME31L
2) Maintain schedule lines -ME38
3) MIGO-
4)MIRO
That is working.
A ) But then why it is necessary to maintain in material master under purchasing tab- JIT
and
B) in vendor master -Creation profile
Please can u explain me A and B
Regards,
Mahesh.

Hi Mahesh,
Maintaining JIT in material master is necessary only if you wish to Use JIT scheduling agreement schedule lines, if you are fine with only FRC schedule line, then you don't need to update this field. This is a control on the material level, like you know if a certain material can't be managed on a JIT level then you will not use it, so JIT agreements can't be created for it.
I don't feel Creation Profile is mandatory for vendor master, because you can opt to enter the creation profile in the Scheduling agreement additional data. Creation profile basically has a lot of control function, here isthe abstract from SAP Help
The creation profile determines:
    Which event triggers the creation of a scheduling agreement release (changes involving the lines of the overall schedule and/or the reaching of the next transmission date)
    How the delivery dates are shown (aggregation and release horizon)
    Whether Backlogs and Immediate Requirements are determined and shown in the scheduling agreement (SA) release
    Whether a tolerance check is carried out for SA releases that are created due to changes to the overall delivery schedule in the system
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Scheduling agreement JIT

Hello Experts
If Scheduling agreement is released JIT does still able to release before after the delivery date ? any restriction.
JIT is only for customer to notify the delivery date or on time ? or else back our own system also get restricted ?
thanks
MM

JIT is short term requirement and should be released well before delivery date as agreed with supplier.
[JIT|http://help.sap.com/SAPHELP_470/helpdata/EN/75/ee0fb555c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Edited by: Karthik on Aug 15, 2011 11:10 AM

Forecast calculated wrongly

Hello Team,
The problem is that movement types 631/632 (deliveries to customer consignment stock) were not taken into consideration.
I added them manually, but the figures in MC94 after this transaction is not relevant to MB51. And that is the reason that forecast was calculated wrongly.
Could you please help me in this. Help will be appriciated.

It may be you aquire the assets in Mid year and calculating the depreciation from that month,but system is posting total depreciation in that particular month by taking in to account all the previous month depreciation
Have check the depreciation by changing the depreciation start date to start of your Asset accounting year
Thanks
Ansuman
Edited by: Ansuman mohanty on Mar 31, 2008 1:10 PM

GR/IR clearing account calculating wrong price

HI
I am facing the problem with GR/IR clearing a/c, when the user is creating MIGO transation with ref Scheduled agreement PO, its calculating wrong price.
My scenario is :-
Scheduled agreement PO has been created in USD currency (Qua 370*356.07)
While I am doing the MIGO itu2019s not calculating correctly.
I can give some more information below
Company code currency is RUB but transaction currency is USD
PO is creating in USD
Material ledger is activated for this material
Currency exchange rates are updated in daily basis
When I am doing the MIGO the document was created like below
1709250    Duties accrual                     603.152,52- RUB             19.761,89- USD
1100100    Comm.Inv.fin.pr.                 4.624.163,80 RUB            151.507,60 USD
1614000    Transit match.acc.                 422.859,09- RUB             13.870,37- USD
7774100    Pr.diff.oth.goods.               3.598.152,19- RUB            117.875,34- USD
Actually posting is (370356.07=131745.9)
*But here it is showing 13.870.37
I am very thanking full for your Inputs.
Thanks
Ramakrishna
Edited by: DRS12345 on Oct 27, 2010 11:31 AM

Hi,
What has already been posted in SAP has been posted. One alternative in front of you is to create adjustment postings in PCA to post to the correct Profit Center. You can use transaction code 1KEL or 9KE0 for the same but it may not work as most probably you will the GR/IR clearing account set to "Post automatically" in the GL Master. In such a scenario the only option would be to have customized program to create IDOCs with Message Type "PRCMAS" to post the adjustment postings in your system.
regards

Next JIT schedule date in Schedule Agreement

H, This is reg JIT - in Schedule Agreements
JIT schedules are created to day 10.02.2010 ..
In Creation profile for JIT, 'Changed or next date' is given & 'Weekly trans' option is chosen
I could see system calculated 'Next JIT sched' date as 15.02.2010 [Next week monday] , it is as expected
I created JIT today and i am not able to release today itself as part of testing solution. Even in production environment cant i release on same day of JIT schedules creation? why so ?
Help Says only those scheduling agreement items with respect to which the creation date is earlier than the current date are chosen for release generation."

I found the issue ...
output message for JIT was an issue
when i see JIT out message type properties for this message, Print parameters field was set to blanck
When i chenged to Purchase Group, it worked ..
Can some one help me what effect it had in generating message, before that message was green but i was not able to genertae JIT schedules

Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 6) in ME38

Hello Experts,
Need your inputs on the the below error getting generated in ME38
Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 6)
Message no. 06857
Diagnosis
The function module for generating a scheduling agreement release (forecast delivery schedule or JIT delivery schedule) has run up against an error, causing processing to be terminated.
In this case the cause of the error is 6.
System Response
The error may involve one of the following situations:
1: The nature of the error cannot be specified precisely.
2: The forecast delivery schedule or the JIT delivery schedule was generated but no message record could be generated.
3: A document type for which the functions "Generate forecast delivery schedule" or "Generate JIT delivery schedule" are not defined may be involved.
4: A material for which the function "Generate JIT delivery schedule" is not defined may be involved.
5: A scheduling agreement that has not yet been released by all persons responsible may be involved.
6: The factory calendar has not been maintained correctly.
Procedure
Error source 1:
Check whether the vendor and plant shown in the PO actually exist in the system.
Error source 2:
Check the Customizing facility for message determination with respect to delivery schedules created under scheduling agreements (print operation '9').
Error source 3:
In Customizing, maintain the document types accordingly ( Define document types for scheduling agreement). Then create a new scheduling agreement with a document type for which release documentation is defined.
Error source 4:
Maintain the JIT delivery schedule indicator in the material master record.
Error source 5:
Have the scheduling agreement released by the person(s) responsible.
Error source 6:
If you are using a release creation profile without aggregation, you must maintain the factory calendar for the next 999 days
Regards,
Santosh

Hello Mallinath,
I referred the note and following are the observarion in the system.
Step1:Run T-code SE16 (table T001W) to check the calendar ID of the plant.
-----Referred the Calendor ID
Step2: Check the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of release creation profile in customizing. (T-code OLME -> Scheduling Agreement -> Maint. Rel. Creation Profile for Sched. Agmt. w. Rel. Docu.)
Run T-code SCAL to adjust the period of the calendar ID which checked in STEP 1 according to the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of the release creation profile which checked in STEP 2.
(For example, if the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of the release creation profile is "999" days, then the calendar should be extended for the next 999 days at least)
---------In this case factory calendor is valid till 2015 and according to note needs to change the factory calendor till 2018( or for 999 days) ?
Waiting for your inputs.
Thanking you,
Santosh

Schedule agreement LPA

Dear All,
I have maintained the Scheduling agreement with LPA doc type with creation profile 0001 after JIT indicator maintained in material master.
I maintained delivery schedule in ME38 and saved.
But when i try to Generate JIT or Forecast schedules error appears as below.
Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 2)
Message no. 06857
Diagnosis
The function module for generating a scheduling agreement release (forecast delivery schedule or JIT delivery schedule) has run up against an error, causing processing to be terminated.
In this case the cause of the error is 2.
System Response
The error may involve one of the following situations:
1: The nature of the error cannot be specified precisely.
2: The forecast delivery schedule or the JIT delivery schedule was generated but no message record could be generated.
3: A document type for which the functions "Generate forecast delivery schedule" or "Generate JIT delivery schedule" are not defined may be involved.
4: A material for which the function "Generate JIT delivery schedule" is not defined may be involved.
5: A scheduling agreement that has not yet been released by all persons responsible may be involved.
6: The factory calendar has not been maintained correctly.
Procedure
Error source 1:
Check whether the vendor and plant shown in the PO actually exist in the system.
Error source 2:
Check the Customizing facility for message determination with respect to delivery schedules created under scheduling agreements (print operation '9').
Error source 3:
In Customizing, maintain the document types accordingly ( Define document types for scheduling agreement). Then create a new scheduling agreement with a document type for which release documentation is defined.
Error source 4:
Maintain the JIT delivery schedule indicator in the material master record.
Error source 5:
Have the scheduling agreement released by the person(s) responsible.
Error source 6:
If you are using a release creation profile without aggregation, you must maintain the factory calendar for the next 999 days.
Please advice how to proceed further?
I tried to run ME84 but no output found.
Regards

Kindly check the thread
SA delivery schedule release problem

Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

Hi Gurus,
Can you please advise on the below issue..
Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1) Create Delivery order (Order Type : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
Advance thanks for your valid points.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Hi Ram,
Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Condition Types in Scheduling Agreement(Urgent)

Dear Experts.
This is a query with reference to my earlier issue Changes in Condition ME32L.As per suggestions, to get validity periods i have clicked on Time dependent Condition In SPRO settings Under Define document Types.
After that i am not able to enter Custom Conditions while creating a Scheduling Agreement.So i tried by removing this Time dependent setting,then was able to enter Custom Conditions...
But i need to see validity periods too when i change condition types through ME32L...
So,Please give me appropriate Suggestion....
Thanks and Regards
MK

I'm not sure about your own pric proc, but in standard it should works, and also its apply per organization level.
RM0000 and RM1000
    Control the price determination process in POs, quotations, and
    scheduling agreements.
    Both calculation schemas require 2 condition types for the gross
    price: one for automatic price determination (standard: PB00) and
    one for manual maintenance (standard: PBXX).
RM0001 and RM1001
    Determine which condition types you can enter in purchasing document
    headers with time-dependent conditions (e.g. contracts).

Pricing Procedure in Scheduling Agreement

Dear All,
Can we have calculation schema for Scheduling Agreement?
the calculation schema in PO is working ok.
the calculation schema is assigned in vendor master to vendors.
but when the same vendor is used in Scheduling Agreement, not all the conditions are proposed.therefore the pricing is not calculated completed.
how can we have the price determination/Calculation in SA as we have in case of PO?
regards

Dear colleague,
as the scheduling agreements are intended for a very large time of use (typically many years) the conditions indicated in the scheduling agreements can be already not actual after some time. Therefore the use of these conditions can have no sence. If you bill deliveries from scheduling agreements then the conditions/prices will never be taken from the scheduling agreement, but from the condition master.
It is a speciality of scheduling agreements in comparison to the standard orders.
I hope that this information helps a little bit further.
Kind regards,
Akmal Vakhidov
Development Support IMS for SD scheduling agreements, SAP, Walldorf

Forecast delivery schedules and JIT deliveries

Hi Gurus,
Got a question on sales scheduling agreements schedule lines. Our customer sends 10 weeks of forecast delivery schedules and 2 weeks of JIT deliveries. which one of these two are passed to MD04?
Assuming only forecast delivery schedules are seen in MD04:
Assuming customer sends forecast delivery schedule for week2 as 50. but in JIT deliveries he only sent 40 for that week. if only forecast deliveries are see in md04, then my forecast and planning quantity is 50 , but actually my JIT delivery is only 40. AM I producing 10 extra? that means my planning is wrong?

925,
so in system it will show on 3/21 monday
I guess this means that you are entering using a Day format rather than Week format.
You have answered you own question already. If the online SAP help, which you have read and reasonably paraphrased, is not clear enough to make you understand this, I cannot help you.
JIT horizon is 3/23, Forecast is for 3/21.
As I stated before, even though it may in your mind represent a week's demand, it is still for one day. There is no bucketing, nor time-based disaggregation, nor consumption. It is just a scheduling agreement.
You wrote
am using MRP indicator D. that means within jit horizon, consider my jit quanity for requirements. and after jit horizon consider my forecast delivery schedules as requirements.
. This is a reasonable paraphrase of the SAP online help. Do you believe this?
Forecast schedule is for 3/21. NOT for W 12/2011. This is before the JIT horizon, isn't it? What do you think will happen to the forecast schedule, looking at the last 'rules' you just wrote? and as stated in the SAP help that you read?
Now you want to enter JIT schedules. 21/22/23/24/25/26. JIT horizon is 23. 24/25/26 are after JIT horizon. What do you think will happen, based on the 'rules' you just wrote?
I feel my time is being wasted when you keep asking me these questions, already having the answers explicitly stated in SAP oinline help. Since you do not have access to a system, this cannot be a support issue, it is a evidently a matter of idle curiosity for you. I therefore believe I will will move onto other forum questions, where there is a possibility that the questioners will get some business benefit from my answers.
Best Regards,
DB49

Importance of Forecast Delivery Schedules in SD scheduling agreements

Hi ALL,
I would just like to consult you a scenario that I'm facing.
When I create a JIT scheduling agreement, even though that schedule lines are maintained for the JIT delivery schedule tab, if the Forecast delivery schedule tab has no schedule lines, the NET value of the document will be zero.
Can you explain the Logic behind this?
Also, why am I not allowed to create an outbound delivery and invoice if the Forecast Delivery schedule tab has no schedule lines?
I know that the document will be incomplete without the net value, but why is it even though schedule lines are created in the JIT tab?
Please help me with this.
Thanks in advance guys!

This is what I found out in an SAP “Knowledge Base Article" (1472965), indicating that there has to be requirements in the forecast delivery schedule in order for the schedujle agreement line item to not be considered incomplete for price.
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap/support/notes/convert2pdf/002007204200000153012010?sap-language=EN
Resolution
l You have to enter schedule lines for the forecast delivery schedule
l The VBAP-NETWR is calculated based on forecast delivery schedule and not according to the JIT delivery schedule
Regards,
Jeff

Scheduling Agreement JIT / Forecast calculating wrong

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for