Scheduling Agreement Problem

When a schedule agreement is created in SAP 1000 company code  with one price; in many cases the price will subsequently change.
The new price for the material is maintained by purchasing.
At the time of an invoice matching against the PO however - SAP appears to validate the invoice against the original price, rather than the current price.
Thus an incorrect price variance is notified to the  processor.
How to take action on this plz kindly give me the right solution.
Regards
sapman

Dear all
       Price should be maintained in Purchase Info record first,Then If any changes happens after Sch.Aggrement creation you need to create One new scheduling agreemnt & u have to update in Source list the New Schedule Agreement No & MRP indicate 2, to create Delivery schedule during MRP run.
If you do as per the above,I think price will not get changed
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Similar Messages

  • Problem updating Volume in Sales Scheduling Agreement

    Hi gurus,
    we have problem with Sales Scheduling Agreement. It's about volume of material. First, I create a Scheduling Agreement for material A, what is 100 CCM of volume in its register master material. I create several forecast delivery schedule. After, I modify by other reasons the volume of material A in master material to 200 CCM. What is the problem? The problem is when system creates the deliveries for Scheduling Agreement, the packaging is did in base 100 CCM of volume and not is for 200 CCM.
    Besides of this, after if modify volume in master material I will add new forecast delivery schedules, the volume is calculated based in old volume factor: 100 CCM.
    We don't understand this behaviour in system.
    Thank you!!!!

    Hi,
    The reason is, the link of updating automatically from material master data to sales SA is broken!
    You should double check the volume at item level in Sales SA, enter the sales SA, select menu>Goto>Item-->Shipping, see the value of field "Volume", whether it's 200 CCM, or not? I think it should still be 100 CCM, change it to 200 CCM, that will be okay!
    Good luck
    Z.T

  • Problem with MM Scheduling Agreement Inbound Delivery

    Hello all Gurus,
    I have a problem with inbound delivery. Whenever I am trying to create inbound delivery in VL31N with the total open quantity of MM scheduling agreement, I am getting a warning message as below
    "Notified quantity less than goods receipt quantity".
    If the quantity was less then 80, then I should get this message.
    But the total open quantity in MM Scheduling agreement in ME38 is 80. So when I am creating the inbound delivery for 80, why system is giving me this warning message????
    Kindly advise whether we have to maintain any settings anywhere or am I missing something here.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Umakanth.

    Got the result.

  • Problem in Delivery of Scheduling Agreement

    Dear Senior's,
    ->I have created a scheduling agreement for material XYZ of 100 Boxes
    Settings for forecast delivery schedule are
    Date              Time    Order Qty   SLT  CML released qty  Open qty  Confirmed qty   Delivery Block   Bomexp    SL Category
    17.12.2009 ;  00:00    10              1         10                        10                 10                      -                          -                 CN   
    20.12.2009 ;  00:00    25              1         35                        25                 25                      -                          -                 CN
    25.12.2009 ;  00:00    20              1         55                        20                 20                      -                          -                 CN
    02.01.2010 ;  00:00    15              1         15                        15                 15                      -                          -                 CN
    07.01.2010 ;  00:00    30              1         45                        30                 30                      -                          -                 CN
    JIT Delivery Schedule
    No entries
    Planning Delivery Schedule
    Date              Time    Order Qty   SLT  CML released qty  Open qty  Confirmed qty   Delivery Block   Bomexp    SL Category
    17.12.2009    00:00    10              1         10                                             10                      -                          -                 BP   
    20.12.2009    00:00    25              1         35                                             25                      -                          -                 BP
    25.12.2009    00:00    20              1         55                                             20                      -                          -                 BP
    02.01.2010    00:00    15              1         15                                             15                      -                          -                 BP
    07.01.2010    00:00    30              1         45                                             30                      -                          -                 BP
    Now whenever I create a delivery for date 17.12.2009 with reference to Sch. agreement, delivery had selected directly 100 boxes instead of 10 and it shows an error in notes Schedule lines were rejected due to differing delivery date/time
    I've done settings in delivery type for referencing sales order(i.e. scheduling agreement) with default order type.
    Kindly solve my problem as I have been stucked here from last 3 days.
    Regards,
    Anand Malu
    Jr. SAP SD Consultant
    Edited by: genius_anand on Dec 14, 2009 7:08 AM

    Problem in posting this thread
    trying to post it again

  • Problem in Scheduling agreement in MM

    Hi Guys,
    I was trying to create Sch. agreement in the MM side.
    Step1. Created S.Agreement with the transaction code ME31L.
    Step 2. Maintained S.Agreement schedule lines using transaction code ME38.
    Then when open up Me38 and see,  there is a open  target qty is '0'.
    So what could be problem here, do I missing anything please explain me.
    Even I tried to create MIGO the error message is "Document XXXXXXXX does not contain any selectable items.
    So please some one explain me what could be the reason by getting open target qty is '0'.
    If you need any further information please let me know.
    Thanks
    ANGKS

    Dear
    Check weather material type what you are using.
    Check if you have release stretagy for that Pur docu Type.
    If yes  then
    ME35L - Release  by giving relese code.
    ME38 - Maintain   the Scheduling agreement.
    Check delivery Scheedule History for that  Scedule agreement for GR.
    with regards
    Shrinivas gangoor

  • Problem in Scheduling Agreement Delivery Schedule

    Hi Guru's,
    We have a one problem in scheduling agreement delivery schedule.We are having delivery schedule from 29.05.2007 to 02.09.2009.As per standard procedure while raising GR the system updates GR quantity in first open quantity delivery schedule and it will go one by one delivery schedule. But in our case we raised many GR's and it was updated like that.But recent one GR(quantity - 2736) has skipped four delivery schedule and it has updated fifth delivery schedule.
    We dont know why system has skipped four delivery schedule.
    Anyone aware the reason.If any procedure or indicator is there.
    Please help us.
    I have attached screen shot for your reference.
    Points will be rewared.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Naga.

    Hi Tao,
    Thank you so much for your reply.
    I have created two delivery schduled,Afterwards I released second delivery schedule please note taht I did not released first delivery schedule.
    Then I raised GR but the GR quantity is updating in first delivery schedule eventhough not released.As per your statement it has to update in second delivery schedule.But it is not working.
    Kindly suggest to me, Whether my understing is correct or not.
    I am expecting your valuable reply.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Nagapandian.

  • Problems in transferring Scheduling Agreements from ECC to APO

    Hi All
    We are facing a strange problem in transferring scheduling agreements to APO.
    When we create the integration model, it shows the selected scheduling agreements and vendors. On activating the integration model in CFM2 or CFM3, we do not get any error.
    But when we check in APO, we do not see any scheduling agreements.
    Can any one tell us what could be problem or where should we check to identify the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Mitesh

    Hi Mitesh,
    Did you try deleting all the integration models in CFM7 and trying again ? You could also try deleting the blocked queues in SMQ1.
    Regards
    Mukundan

  • Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

    Dear Experts,
    We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
    Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
    Regards,
    Soumick

    Hi,
    The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
    This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
    In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
    In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
    However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
    In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
    Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
    For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
    If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
    By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
    transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
    Solution
    First, the system behaves as intended.
    It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
    In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
    In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
    Regards,
    Udaya.

  • Problem in entering Target Quantity for scheduling agreement

    Hi All,
    While I create a new Scheduling agreement and enter teh target quantity system throws an error showing that target value is too large. But I want to enter the same quantity & can't reduce the same.  while seeing the help of the error it says The target value has exceeded the internal system maximum value. & Check your input
    How can I enter the required quantity without facing that problem again.
    Regards,
    Ramaswamy

    Hai;
    This settings related to maximum value is an FI settings.pls consult your FI consultants .

  • Problem While Uploading Customer Requirements To Scheduling Agreement

    Hi
    I have received a ticket from client which is as below .
    As itu2019s new issue for me , I am not able to fix the issue . It goes like this u2026u2026.
    Customer  scheduling agreement. 30000000
    Part 300.F
    The customer  862u2019s have been coming in during the mid morning hours (8or 8:30AM)
    The customer  830u2019s and 862u2019s arrive once a week, on Fridays. 862 adds 5 addition firm order onto the end of the remaining firm orders.
    This is what happened this morning.
    7AM, VL10A due to ship today correctly shows 425pc.
    7AM we created todays delivery for 425pc. Delivery 80005515. this removed the 425 from the open quantity on the scheduling agreement.
    After the delivery was created for todayu2019s shipment, the new 862u2019s arrived, from customer , and populated the scheduling agreement.
    Todayu2019s shipment was PGIed.
    The scheduling agreement below shows 425pc due to ship today after we made todayu2019s shipment.
    The problem seems to happen when todayu2019s delivery is already set up and THEN the new 862u2019s arrive and populates the scheduling agreement.
    Is there any way of resolving this issue?
    We know that the customer  scheduling agreement is set up differently to receive 862u2019s.
    This customer  adds new firm orders each Friday.
    So , could I request you to help me out in this case where I have to check up and how can I fix the issue .
    Thanks in advance .

    Hi Friends
    Could I request you to help me out on this aspect
    Thanks

  • Problems in sending Scheduling Agreement Change using ORDCHG

    Hi All,
    I am having problem while sending Scheduling Agreement change from a source system to a target system using ORDCHG in ALE,
    Its going to ORDERS and creating a fresh new Sales Order instead of creating ORDCHG idoc's & creating a new order only for the chages.
    Please provide some inputs on what Messge Types can support Scheduling Agreement change to Sales Order change.
    Regards
    Rajendra.

    Hi Pavan,
    Thanks for ur suggestion.
    I have tried with DELINS message type, the IDoc is getting created but in the receiver side the status always remains 51 with message Vendor XXXXX not saved for the customer YYYYY.
    Thanks
    Rajendra

  • BDC problem for Schedule Agreement

    Hi,
    We are facing a problem in BDC for Schedule Agreement - Tick on Delivery Completed.
    In SA line items are like this..
    10.............AAAAA..................10.....NOS
    20.............BBBBB..................20.....NOS
    30.............CCCCC...................5......NOS
    60.............DDDDD..................40.....NOS
    We want update Delivery Completed indicator in line items 10 & 60.
    Our Flat File is like...
    5500004556.......10
    5500004556.......60
    During BDC, this updates the line item 10 successfully, but when going for updating line item 60, not picking related item (means 60..DDDDD..40..NOS), it is going on line item 60 of the SA (means it is counting line item 40 inplace of 60, but in SA there is no 40 line item)..
    Regards..

    Thanks Dear..
    Please let me know, where I can change in my code...
    Code of Line Item
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-EBELP'        wa-ebelp.
    CASE wa-ebelp.
    WHEN 10.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(01)'                                 'X'.
    WHEN 20.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(02)'                                  'X'.
    WHEN 30.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(03)'                                   'X'.
    WHEN 40.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(04)'                                   'X'.
    WHEN 50.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(05)'                                    'X'.
    WHEN 60.
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM06E-TCSELFLAG(06)'                                    'X'.
    ENDCASE.
    Code of Line Item
    please guide..

  • Problem in pricing procedure of scheduling agreement

    Dear All,
    I am creating a scheduling agreement, when i am giving condition type at item level a message occur "Condition type XXXX is not in procedure A M ZB1002" Message no. VK045.
    I am not able to understand from where this pricing procedure is picking. But in Define Schema Determination the pricing procedure is different, it is ZBLOSR.
    The same case is happening in info record while maintaining condition type, the same pricing procedure ZB1002 is picking up by default. I want to change the pricing procedure.
    Please help.....

    hi..
    have u maintained the combination of schema group for vendor schema group, purchasing org and pricing procedure...
    and assign this vendor schema group to vendor master...
    From this combination system getch the pricing procedure for particular vendor...
    go to spro..MM ..Purchasing..Condition...Define Price Determination Process..Define Schema Group..
    check these settings...
    Hope it works..
    Thanks..

  • Problem during grn for scheduling agreement

    Dear Pals,
                    I have done scheduling agreement with doc.type LP. I have maintained schedule lines also. While doing GRN for that, it is throwing an error
                                 " PU ordered quntity exceeded by 300 ea: 3000000200 "
    How could i resolve this...
    Prasath

    Hi,
    How you had maintained schedule lines...month wise/week wise/ day wise.
    If suppose you maintained month wise like 11/2008 --- 300 qty and you are making GR in 12/2008 then system will allow but if you are making GR before the schedule line date/period then system will give you the above error.
    Please check your dates in schedule lines and GR date. Gr date must be on schedule line date or after the schedule line date.
    Please provide the dates maintained in schedule and GR date.
    Regards,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on Dec 8, 2008 11:10 AM

  • Date Problem in Scheduling Agreement  Creation

    Hi,
            When I create a scheduling agreement (Category : HG) say 31st bucket it automatically gets shifted to next bucket ( Weekly Bucket) Creating the scheduling agreement within the planned delivery time. Pls let me know the reason for this.
    Thanks,
    Siva.

    Check OSS Notes 770315 and 757870.
    There was a code issue for SNP Purchase Reqs which is corrected by notes 989857, 1045636 ad 1045891.
    Also note that the normal process for Procurement Proposal creation is a Backward and then Forward Scheduling. Due to varying calendars (receving and shipping) at the locations the results of Backward and then Forward Scheduling can give differences. However it should not create the receipts late (as is your case).
    Thanks,
    Somnath

Maybe you are looking for