SCOM Monitoring Multiple interface of a same network device

hi
I have deployed SCOM 2012 R2. I have discovered around 200 network device by using device's loopback IP adress with SNMP v3.
100 dvices are in the branch offices those are connected with 3 links in three interfaces respectively. Even if two link is down, i can see that my network device is healthy since network device is discovered with the loopback address. How can i configure
my network monitoring so that even if one link goes down i can see some kind of warning or error in the particular network device in my monitoring pane. Please say if my infrastructure is unclear.

Hi,
You can create built-in network ICMP only network monitoring for the three interfaces respectively.
Using the built-in network monitoring within Operations Manager 2012 to monitor network devices using ICMP only mode
http://blogs.catapultsystems.com/cfuller/archive/2013/07/03/using-the-built-in-network-monitoring-within-operations-manager-2012-to-monitor-network-devices-using-icmp-only-mode-scom-sysctr.aspx
Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

WLC-2106 and multiple interfaces on the same network

Hi there,
I recently created a TAC request to the Cisco support regarding our WLC-2106, but they could not help me. Basically I just learned that you can create new interfaces for the wireless LAN controller and then dedicate them to a given wireless network (SSID). This way I could more effectively utilize network bandwidth also. Problem is that all of the interfaces have to be in a different network segment in order to work, which is not what I want. I specifically want to have several interfaces on the same network segment.
Has anyone tried to accomplish the same?

Basically what I've misunderstood is that all the traffic generated by our wireless clients have been going through the single 100Mbit/s ethernet port on the wireless LAN controller (management interface), and to mitigate this I thought I could create new interfaces (ports) and dedicate those to given WLAN networks.. I see now that this is not supported. Not inside the same network at least.
So, by reading further and consulting my best friend Google I learned about a setting called "AP Mode". Changing that from Local (the default) to H-REAP the APs should not route their traffic anymore through the management interface on the wireless controller, but instead route all the client traffic directly to the local LAN. This way you effectively remove the 100Mbit/s bottle-neck when all the APs were using the management interface both for configuration and client data traffic.
It seems you also have to enable H-REAP Local switching from a given WLAN network in addition to changing the AP Mode of your access points to H-REAP. I'm still in the testing phase here so should anyone have any insight to this, I'd be greatful to hear more.

Same network device gets discovered multiple times in scom

Hi All,
In SCOM 2012 , Same network device gets discovered multiple times.
For example, if we have an ip address 10.91.180.43 added to Network discovery rule.
When Discovery is run few times.
its gets discovered multiple times and shows 3 or 4 times under Network Devices.
Please help me to fix this issue.
Thank you
Siva

Hi dktoa,
Thank you for the quick reply. i would like to explain my issue in clear.
For example, if we have an ip address 10.91.180.43 added to Network discovery rule.
When Discovery is run few times. its gets discovered multiple times and shows 3 or 4 times under Network Devices. And it gets listed multiple times with same ipaddress not with different ip.
it will look like this
10.91.180.43
10.91.180.43
10.91.180.43
---- I read both articles, they are were interesting.
Do you mean to say that my issue will get fixed , if i change the AccessAddressFormat = "AUTOADDRESS" as
AccessAddressFormat = "LOOPBACKADDRESS"
Please guide me if i am wrong.
Thank you once again.
Regards
Siva

How to use multiple Interfaces for the same BS?

Hi @ ,
Is it possible to have a scenarion where i am using multiple interfaces in the same BS based upon some conditional field in the message.
I amnot able to get the solution I know with condition editor I can have multiple receivers but in my scenarion based upon message fiels i have to decide which BAPI to be used and wht mapping and then post it to the same System
Any help will be highly rewarded
Regards

Hi-
Yes it is possible you can use multimapping for mapping the interfaces.
To know more about multimapping see
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/6faf35c2d74295a3cb97f6f3ccf43c/content.htm
Some more helpful links
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Use two interfaces on the same network

Hello every one,
I actually starting to work on a cisco project. I'm a beginner on networking and cisco technologie.
For my project we use a router 2921.
We got two network:
- Network A: 192.198.0.X / 255.255.255.0 / Gateway 192.198.0.1
- Network B: 162.168.0.X / 255.255.0.0 / Gateway 162.168.0.1
Each network use switch, Switch A (connecting to network A) is connected to interface G0/0.
And Switch B (connecting to network B) is connected to interface G0/1.
Router well configured as:
- G0/0: ip address 192.198.0.1 255.255.255.0 (network A)
- G0/1: ip address 162.168.0.1 255.255.0.0 (network B)
Every think working fine.
The problem is with this one, we need to connect a computer on G0/2. This computer is configure as network A (192.198.0.10 / 255.255.255.0 and same gateway).
I can't configure G0/2 as 192.198.0.1 255.255.255.0 (network A), cause G0/0 use this adresse.
I can't put this computer on the switch A, my only physical possibilité is to connect him on G0/2.
We just need to use interface G0/0 and G0/2 as a switch on the router with the same gateway (192.198.0.1)
How can i connect this computeur? How can i configure two interfaces on the same network and same gateway?
Thanks you

I would just put the PC on a different network, but if you really want it to be in the same network, you could use IRB to connect two of the interfaces on the router at layer 2.
Here is an example config for IRB:
interface FastEthernet0/0
bridge-group 1
interface FastEthernet0/1
bridge-group 1
bridge irb
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
bridge 1 route ip
Notice that the physical ports do not have IP addresses on them, the IP for the subnet is on the BVI interface.

Timesten replication with multiple interfaces sharing the same hostname

Hi,
we have in our environment two Sun T2000 nodes, running SunOS 5.10 and hosting a TT server currently in Release 7.0.5.9.0, replicated between each other.
I would like to have some more information on the behavior of the replication w.r.t. network reliability when using two interfaces associated to the same hostname, the one used to define the replication element.
To make an example we have our nodes sharing this common /etc/hosts elements:
151.98.227.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-10 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.226.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-01 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.227.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-10 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
151.98.226.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-01 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
with the following element defined for replication:
ALTER REPLICATION REPLSCHEME
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_1 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_2 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST;
On this subject moving from 6.0.x to 7.0.x there has been some changes I would like to better understand.
6.0.x reported in the documentation for Unix systems:
If a host contains multiple network interfaces (with different IP addresses),
TimesTen replication tries to connect to the IP addresses in the same order as
returned by the gethostbyname call. It will try to connect using the first address;
if a connection cannot be established, it tries the remaining addresses in order
until a connection is established.
Now On Solaris I don't know how to let gethostbyname return more than one interface (the documention notes at this point:
If you have multiple network interface cards (NICs), be sure that “multi
on” is specified in the /etc/host.conf file. Otherwise, gethostbyname will not
return multiple addresses).
But I understand this could be valid for Linux based systems not for Solaris.
Now if I properly understand the above, how was the 6.0.x able to realize the first interface in the list (using the same -ttrep hostname) was down and use the other, if gethostbyname was reporting only a single entry ?
Once upgraded to 7.0.x we realized the ADD ROUTE option was added to teach TT how to use different interfaces associated to the same hostname. In our environment we did not include this clause, but still the replication was working fine regardless of which interface we were bringing down.
My both questions in the end lead to the same doubt on which is the algorithm used by TT to reach the replicated node w.r.t. entries in the /etc/hosts.
Looking at the nodes I can see that by default both routes are being used:
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.227."
151.98.225.104.45312 151.98.227.4.14000 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.47307 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.48230 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.46050 151.98.227.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.226."
151.98.226.5.14000 151.98.226.4.47699 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.14005 151.98.226.4.47308 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.44949 151.98.226.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
Tried to trace with ttTraceMon but once I brought down one of the interfaces did not see any reaction on either node, if you have some info it would be really appreciated !
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply, I have few more queries on this.
1.Using the ROUTE CLAUSE we can use multiple IPs using priority level set, so that if highest priority level set in thr ROUTE clause for the IP is not active it will fall back to the next level priority 2 set IP. But cant we use ROUTE clause to use the multiple route IPs for replication simultaneously?
2. can we execute multiple schema for the same DSN and replication scheme but with different replication route IPs?
for example:
At present on my system, I have a replication scheme running for a specific DSN with stand alone Master-Subscriber mechanism, with a specific route IP through VLAN-xxx for replication.
Now I want to create and start another replication scheme for the same DSN and replication mechanism with a different VLAN-yyy route IP to be used for replication in parallel to the existing replication scheme. without making any changes to the pre-existing replication scheme.
for the above scenarios, will there be any specific changes respective to the different replication schema mechanism ie., Active Standby and Standalone Master Subscriber mechanism etc.,
If so what are the steps. like how we need to change the existing schema?
Thanks In advance.
Naveen

Multiple Users Mounting the Same Network Share?

Hello, first time posting...
I'll cut right to my main question: Is it possible, on OS X v10.3.9, for multiple users to simultaneously connect to the same network share?
Here in my office, we have a single Mac that is used by multiple people throughout the day. It has two accounts on it, 'Communications' and 'Studio'. 'Communications' is an Admin account that is used by a co-worker who spends the most time on the Mac. He created the no-limitation 'Studio' account for the rest of us to use.
There is a certain Windows network share that we both frequently use. We've found that if one user connects to the share first, the other user will not have access to it; using 'Go -> Connect to Server' will result in the share being greyed out in the list, and the share will not show up in the Finder.
However, there is one way around it. If Studio connects to the share first and then Communications (the admin account) attempts to make a connection of it's own *through a shortcut on the dock*, then a 'clone' of the share will be created on Comm's desktop, with a "-1" after the name (though it might be some other number).
This may sound like I've answered my own question, but what I'm looking for is a way for the non-Admin account to access the share after the Admin account already has (so that we don't have to log-in and disconnect Communications everytime Studio needs to manage files on the share).
We have Thursby Software's DAVE installed on the Mac, but I'm not sure how it fits into all this.
Any thoughts, suggestions or advice?
Thanks.

Bizarre. It turned out I could merge them, but only in to the mapped drive - L: - and only by explicitly clicking on the drive icon - if I typed L:\series in to dialog box it converted it back to \\nas\share\series... Not helpful.

Multiple printers on the same network problem

I have 2 HP OJ Pro 8600 printers and one HP OJ Pro 8500 Plus printer on the same network. My question is whether it is possible to change the network name of these printers so that it is easier to identify them.
The printers are in three different buildings so there is little stress to run around to find out where the print comes.

Hi JObbern
If all the printers are on the same network you won't be able to change the network name on the printer.
You can change the name of the printer though on each computer. Depending on the operating system you are using, go to the printers window, right click and rename. Example Office1, Office 2.
If the option isn't available you can go to the printer window and add a printer and change the printer name through the wizard.
Hope that helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

How do I merge multiple instances of the same network share?

In my (large) Lightroom 5.2 (Windows) library I have three instances of, essentially, the same network share (a Drobo NAS) which appear separately in the library.
One appears as Share (\\nas) L:, one as \\nas\Share and one as \\nas\share. The contents of the share are spread randomly across the three - so one might contain the folders series\event1, series\event4 and series\event5 and another series\event2, series\event3 and series\event6.
Is there an easy way to convince Lightroom that they're all the same physical location and merge them in the library? No amount of dragging, dropping, importing or synchronization seems to have had any effect so far!
Guy

Bizarre. It turned out I could merge them, but only in to the mapped drive - L: - and only by explicitly clicking on the drive icon - if I typed L:\series in to dialog box it converted it back to \\nas\share\series... Not helpful.

Airplay from Multiple Sources on the Same Network

Hi,
I have a question that I was hoping someone could answer. I recently upgraded to iTunes 11 and bought a B&W A7 Airplay system. It works fine (bar the odd drop out). My question is, if I buy another A7 for another room and someone else in my house on the same network wants to airplay music from thier iOS device to that speaker whilst I am using iTunes to play music through the speaker in my room will that cause a problem?
In other words, can you have 2 different speakers recieving an airplay stream from 2 different devices?
Thanks in advance.

Hi JObbern
If all the printers are on the same network you won't be able to change the network name on the printer.
You can change the name of the printer though on each computer. Depending on the operating system you are using, go to the printers window, right click and rename. Example Office1, Office 2.
If the option isn't available you can go to the printer window and add a printer and change the printer name through the wizard.
Hope that helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Create TCP port monitor to ping windows server or network device

Dears
I'm trying to create TCP port monitor which tests the ping of a remote network device or windows computer from the watcher node, but I don't know which port to use, is there a specific port number?
Thanks
Mohammad, IT NOC Team

I also would like to share the following article with you. It is a sample script that will use netstat –an to check the TCP ports currently in a listening state on the local system
and parse the output to determine that the defined TCP port is in a listening state.
http://operatingquadrant.com/2009/08/13/scom-locallly-monitoring-a-listening-tcp-port/
Niki Han
TechNet Community Support

Multiple Application Instances Accessing Same DAQ Device

I have a fairly straightforward application that reads from a wireless DAQ device (NI-9205 connected to NI WLS-9163). I'd like to run multiple instances of the executable, but I get error -201105 (resource reserved) when the DAQmx task is started on the second instance. Each instance is attempting to acquire from different channels from the same DAQ device. Is this an issue with the DAQ device in particular, or with DAQmx in general? Thanks.
-Joe
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Joe,
Unfortunately you can only access one type of channel with each program. For example you could have one program access AI and another use AO, but you cannot have two different programs access AI from the same card. This is common among all of NI DAQ devices.

Multiple Computers on the same network

We're currently transitioning to Windows 8.1 MRD after many years running OSX and ARD in our small office.
We have two computers that we need to access independently from the outside. We opened up the recommend port for MRD and have it working as expected on a single computer. However, we can only gain access to a single machine from the outside. With Apple Remote
Desktop, you simply open up additional ports to allow access for multiple machines. Super easy. We decided to do the same with MRD, but failed with everything we attempted.
Does MRD not support using custom ports for multiple computers?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
We can achieve the result as you want with remote desktop connection. We need to allow the port from firewall end and can apply particular rules with advanced option for specific ports. Also if you are using Routers then need to open the port from router end,
and finally when connecting user “servername:portnumber” and provide credentials.
Please checkthis article for more details.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Multiple user on the same Network

hi,
I am working on network, i would like to setup a network schema which can be accessed by multi user, each user should work on particular portion of network, without disturbing others.
How can i set up this kind of architecture,
whether one network can be partition for multi-user or any other alternative is there...
Rams

tastyrico wrote:
Hi Drew,
Thanks for the recommendations. They are useful tips to have in the arsenal, thanks. However, the preferences discussed are intended for directly attached external hard disks and the specific discussion was to make it available to the network on a Mac that is powered up with no user logged in (like a OS X Server but user still need to log in).
That's correct, I'm sorry I am wrong.
I do remember another defaults write option for detaching network drives on 'switch to loginwindow' because I needed the same thing - eventually I gave up & disabled fast user switching, it reduced the amount of issues for the clients. Sorry for confusing the two.
Have you considered mounting it via a startup script. At the moment it is failing because the path exists when User2 mounts it. If you try a script (at the level of the system) it should mount only once. Obviously sticking usernames & passwords into a script is not the best for security.
I think this issue is what NFS mounts can overcome, but I haven't used them for so long. They should be able to mount with no user interaction, but they are less flexible with permissions IIRC.
If your NAS supports NFS look at that, I think you both need to remove the user as the agent that mounts the disk. If the OS does it once (& permissions are correct) it should remove the 'diskname-1' issue.
When it works you end up with volumes in /Network/diskname.
I don't have a good place to start with NFS, so take a look around here…
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4144999
@ElisabethBraut, do you get this error form MS…
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2712085
MS apps fall apart when you have disks mounted like this, it's a consequence of MS apps using an older way to represent filepaths.

How to set up multiple computers on the same network

I have a small network with 4 computers on it. Two of these I would like to be able to access from outside of the office using Remote Desktop. Before I had this set up working just fine with only one computer, but have recently started sharing my office space with another person. Their I.T. guy set up their own connections and rerouted the default ports to their computer instead of mine. My router is a Netgear WNDR3700. Computer 1 is using the default port being forwarded to it's I.P. I moved the ports up by one number for the other computer and have it forwarding to it's IP. For example, 3389 on Comp. 1 is 3390 on Comp 2.
Now what I can't make happen is this connection to work when I try it. So I'm just wondering if there is a way that I can do this?

you would need to setup a VPN and tunnel into your office.
FYI..the default ports are 3283 and 5900.

SCOM Monitoring Multiple interface of a same network device

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for