Score Editor: Force Syncopation and Note Alignment issue

Two issues here:
1 - Is it possible to get the A in the Left Hand to align with the Right Hand Chord on the second half of Beat 3?.... Dont understand why the problem is here and it looks dreadful to read
2 - Upper Example is with Force Syncopation ( ie following Ski's past rule that he leaves Syncopation Unchecked in the inspector and Forces Sync on individual note groups).
Lower Example is without Force Syncopation.
In both examples I cannot get what I would like it to display which is dotted quarter notes in the Right Hand Chord tied across the imaginary middle of the bar line to the notes on Beat 3
All suggestions welcome
best
M S

Just to say - the Layout Tool cured it.. just moved the A bass note along to the right till it lined up with the chord above.. (credit to iS in 'another place')
Still havent found a way to split the first chord in the right hand over an invisible barline in the middle.
ie with the first note a dotted quarter note tied to the 3rd beat..
Can Logic do this?
Message was edited by: musicspirit

Similar Messages

Score Editor bug: syncopating a note disturbs line layout

In the example below, the instrumental part with max 2 bars per line has been created with the Layout Tool, and then the selection saved as a Score Set ( which i hope locks all the page details in place).
[img] http://i364.photobucket.com/albums/oo82/dogliege/Picture3.png [/img]
I then noticed that the red circled note is not displayed correctly - it should be a dotted eighth note and duly click on it with my Syncopate note command.
This then produces the following effect: it crunches up the bars and disturbs the line layout which was already set, cramming 3 bars onto the line above as in the example below.
[img]http://i364.photobucket.com/albums/oo82/dogliege/Picture4.png[/img]
Any solutions appreciated/workflow suggestions.. or is this just "..another L8 Score Editor bug.. wasting more of 2009"
PS Any suggestions as how to get the images to display in the post - as opposed to appear a link? cheers
Message was edited by: musicspirit

i should be enjoying my holiday but i couldn't help myself...
there are a couple of fixes for this.
first, try cutting the regions somewhere to force a redraw.
second, if no form of cutting or reformatting works, try copy and pasting the midi into a fresh autoload on the intel.
particularly if the file was created pre 7.2. there can be compatibility issues between ppc and intel.

Not distributued and Not included issues.

We have a couple of issues with Not distributed and Not included issues. First, since they are commingled with our variances they do not get passed through to PA so we are off between GL and PA. Second, the not distributed are not part of inventory since they remain in the variance account.
Anyone have experience with these and any solutions for these issues?
SAP says we can turn off the price delimiter but we are uncertain as to the effect overall.
Anyway to isolate these to a different GL account posting?

Solution
 **'Not distributed' price differences can be due to three reasons:
 A) System applied a 'Price limiter' logic (stock coverage check).
 You can analyse this case using the value flow monitor transaction:
 - for release 4.7 , transaction CKMVFM
 - for release 4.6C, program SAPRCKM_VERIFY_PRICE_DET (note 324754 is required).
 - for release < 4.6C: Program ZVERIFY_PRICE_DET included in the note 324754 Or directly checking the field CKMLPP-PBPOPO manually.
 In this case, the value field CKMLPP-PBPOPO > cumulative inventory.
 If you still want these price differences to be distributed , you can switch off price limiter logic. Then all price differences are posted to stock, and the price difference account is cleared. You should decide
 for each material if you want to switch off price limiter logic or not.
 So you can achieve a compromise between realistic prices and clearing
 the balance of the price different account.
 Price limiter logic can be switched off in the following way:
Resetting the price limiter quantity:
 In release 4.7 this is done uising transaction CKMVFM.
 In release <= 46C using the ZREMOVE_PRICE_LIMITER (see note 325406).
Note 855387:
 Application of this note will create an additional selection parameter for step 'Single Level Price Determination' to switch on/off price limiter logic.
 This option is the better way, as it is faster provides more flexibility (see the note for more information).
 B) System applied a fallback strategy during price determination
 (see note 579216) to avoid a negative periodic unit price (PUP).
 Please check the attached note 579216:
 If the regularly calculated PUP (based on 'Cumulative Inventory' line) would become negative, the system uses a different strategy to calculate the PUP:
 The PUP is calculated with these priorities:
 1.'Cumulative Inventory' line (no fallback)
 2.Receipts ('ZU') line (Info message C+ 135 in the log)
 3.Beginning inventory ('AB') line (Info message C+ 135 in the log)
 4.PUP-price of previous period (Info message C+ 136 in the log)
 5.S-price (->(Info message C+ 137 in the log)
 The fallback strategy is active by default for Single-Level price determination.
 For multilevel price determination it must be activated with parameter 'Negative price: automatic error management'.
 As a solution, you might check the postings of these materials if they really need to have such big negative price differences or if there is some kind of error in the posting or the production structure
 If you find such errors, you might reverse the corresponding postings and report them in a correct way.
 Or, you might use transaction MR22 (debit/credit material) in order to post a small positive amount of differences to the concerned materials
 so that the resulting actual price would no longer be negative. Then you could perform the period closing (which you had to reverse before).
 In the next period, you might remove this manual posted value from the materials (again with MR22) in order to correct the overall stock values back to their original amounts.
 C) Due to a source code error with transaction CKMM.
 The above situation may be produced because transaction CKMM was executed during the corresponding period.
 When transaction CKMM is processed the system deletes the price differences for the material in the period and these differences are not longer in the period record tables.
 See note 384553 for further details.
 The fact is that the price differences are still visible in CKM3 (as not distributed). This is due to the missing reset of summarization records (MLCD).
 This error is just a problem of CKM3 display, because the differences shown as 'not distributed' do not exist in the periodic records. The PUP of the material is calculated correctly.
 This error is corrected by note 838989 for the future.

Printing 4 up 6x9 pages on 11x17 and not aligning up

Trying to print 4up 6x9 pages on 11 x 17 paper duplex. Indesign layout is exacetly the same for all the pages. When I print the odd page is not aligned up with the even page. Example the header and bottom page number doesn't align up with the side of the page.
I even printed one page first and feed it back in the printer to print the next page. It's close but still off a little bit.
Can someone tell me if I'm missing something here or what my layout is not setup.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Aloha

While Eugen is coorect about what I'm asking, his solution may not work on every printer. Even relatively expensive commercial printers like the Minolta BizHub series and similar products from other vendors don't have the same sort of sheet-to-sheet tolerance for alignment that yo will find with a printing press because they use differnt technology for moving the paper through the machine.
It's not unusual to see drift through a long run of up to 3mm or .125 inch overall acros both the length and the width of the page when working with digital printing equipment. In general that's within the machine tolerance specifications (+/- 1.5 mm) for page-to-page registration, and the only thing you can do is design to account for the possibility and use margins large enough to hide a discrepancy.

Force closing and not updating apps

Why does my phone keep force closing and it's not able to update the Facebook app so it's just stuck!

1. Check iTunes and see if you have a pending/stalled download e.g. Podcast, Books, Music, Movies or iTune U. Finish off the download and you should be able to update.
2. Connect to iTune; and Check for available download (under Store). When download is completed, sync to iPad.
http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee374/Diavonex/f5c1b271.jpg

Force legato and note overlap correction doesn't work

in some songs the overlaop correction and the force legato do not work anymore. I have renewed the keycommands for these functions, it doesn't help

Please check this:
Go to Pianoroll / View / uncheck One Track, check Selected Regions.
Now the keycommands Force Legato, Overlap will work.
(Unfortunately now you only can see one region at the same time, to see all regions you have to check One Track again, or select the track in the main window).

Web site broken up and not aligning

I've messed something up and can't figure it out? My level of website building can't fix this problem. I would like to know what is going on and how to fix it? It has spaces and the alignment it off, like something is flowing over and breaking it up.
Look at http://www.eastportonpickwick.com/
Please advise!
Thanks, Wallace

Ken Pickwick is in Mississippi. I figured it needed to be re-worked. I inherited the site and have managed it with Dreamweaver. Yes the page was built in Fireworks and sliced, but the site is very unique.
Although I must say, as bad as it is, it has done its job and ranks #1 on Google and Bing in most Pickwick Lake searches. I've never had a problem until now with it breaking up and thought I could get some immediate help/direction from this community.
I knew it had errors, but these sophisticated search engines still interpreted the site.
Thanks
Wallace

CFFORMGROUP and child alignment issues

Hi All,
I have several issues that i am trying to resolve.
The most important one right now is the alignment of
checkboxs in a cfformgroup type="hbox" tag.
for stupid reason it aligns them vertically not horizontal.
WTF?
i have set the size of the hbox to be plenty wide enough to
accomidate the children. i have also set several style propertys
but none of them make a difference its like they are ignored.
Below is my code, can someone please tell me what i am doing
wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Tim
<cfsavecontent variable="daysStyle">
marginLeft: 0;
horizontalAlign: 'left';
horizontalGap: 1;
</cfsavecontent>
<cfformgroup type="hbox" style="#daysStyle#" visible="yes"
enabled="yes" width="550">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day1" value="1" label="M"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day2" value="2" label="T"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day3" value="3" label="W"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day4" value="4" label="T"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day5" value="5" label="F"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day6" value="6" label="S"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day7" value="7" label="S"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes">
</cfformgroup>

well its a good thing i did not wait on a reply :)
Here is how i fixed the issue:
The answer is use a TILE group type around the outside.
<cfformgroup type="tile" style="#daysStyle#" >
<cfformgroup type="vbox">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day1" value="1" label="M"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes" width="12" >
<cfinput type="text" width="30" name="hours1"
value="0">
</cfformgroup>
<cfformgroup type="vbox">
<cfinput type="checkbox" name="day2" value="2" label="T"
labelPlacement="top" checked="yes" width="12" >
<cfinput type="text" width="30" name="hours2"
value="0">
</cfformgroup>
</cfformgroup>
hope that hels someone
tim

I wish to upload a PDF file to my website but Firefox 3.6.12 reports it as type application/force-download and NOT application/pdf, WHY?

My website has been running for many months, and as part of the site users can upload PDF documents to share with others. The last successful upload was 5th Nov, but to-day my upload was rejected because Firefox returned the document type as application/force-download rather than application/pdf. Uploads work fine with IE8.
The site uses PHP to check extension and document type and, as I mentioned, has worked fine for many months. I have even attempted to upload the same document that succeeded on the 5th, but again Firefox returns application/force-download as the document type.
Why the change?

Just found a solution.
In Tools, Options, Application Firefox listed TWO options against Adobe Acrobat Documents; the apprliaction/pdf and application/force-download. I have deleted mimeTypes.rdf and allowed Firefox to re-create the file. All works as it should now!

Trying to get AS3 game to keep score of user points and not loop when added to Flash CS4 website

Here is my scripting (seperated into two pages) the font in red is causing the drama so far:
package
 import flash.display.Sprite;
 public class Easymind extends Sprite //Class Definition
 private var timer:Timer;
 private var count:uint;
 private var prevCount:uint;
 private var scoreText:TextField;
 private var score:uint;
 public function Easymind () //Constructor function
 init();
 private function init():void
 var gift:Gift = new Gift();
 gift.x = Math.random() * stage.stageWidth; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 550
 gift.y = Math.random() * stage.stageHeight; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 576
 addChild(gift);
 scoreText = new TextField();
 scoreText.x = 500;
 scoreText.y = 10;
 scoreText.width = 20;
 addChild(scoreText);
 stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN, kill);
 timer = new Timer(5000);
 timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, addGifts);
 timer.start();
 private function addGifts(eTimerEvent)
 prevCount = count;
 count ++;
 for (var i:uint = prevCount; i < count; i++)
 var gift:Gift = new Gift();
 gift.name = "gift" + i;
 gift.x = Math.random() * stage.stageWidth; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 550
 gift.y = Math.random() * stage.stageHeight; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 576
 addChild(gift);
 private function giftShower()
 if (this.numChildren > 250)
 timer.stop();
 var i:int = this.numChildren;
 while(i--)
 removeChildAt(i);
 addChild(scoreText);
SECOND ActionSript PAGE
package
 import flash.display.MovieClip;
 import flash.events.*;
 import flash.utils.Timer;
 import flash.text.*;
 public dynamic class Gift extends MovieClip
 private var dx:Number = Math.random() * 10; // make gift scurry
 private var dy:Number = Math.random() * 10;
 public function Gift ()
 this.gotoAndStop(Math.ceil(Math.random() * 4));
 this.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, scurry);
 stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN, kill);
 public function scurry (e:Event)
 if (this.x < 0 || this.x > 550)
 this.dx *= -1;
 if (this.y < 0 || this.y > 576)
 this.dy *= -1;
 this.x += this.dx; // make gift scurry
 this.y += this.dy;
 public function die()
 this.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, scurry);
 parent.removeChild(this);
 private function kill (e:MouseEvent):void
 if(e.target is Gift)
 e.target.die();
 score += 10;
 scoreText.text = score.toString();

and as i mentioned, what's the problem related to that code. the reason i ask is because that code shouldn't compile. specifically,
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN, kill);
 timer = new Timer(5000);
 timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, addGifts);
 timer.start();
is incorrect. and
 private function addGifts(eTimerEvent)
 prevCount = count;
 count ++;
 for (var i:uint = prevCount; i < count; i++)
 var gift:Gift = new Gift();
 gift.name = "gift" + i;
 gift.x = Math.random() * stage.stageWidth; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 550
 gift.y = Math.random() * stage.stageHeight; // is the same as (0 to 0.99) * 576
 addChild(gift);
 private function giftShower()
is incorrect.
if you don't have a problem with your code compiling, then copy your code and paste it into this forum.

Why is Photobucket is re-directing me to the mobile version of their site, not the desktop version - only since updating to FF v7.0.1 and not an issue in Safari. NB running on MAC OSX 10.5.8.

Firefox automatically re-directs to m.photobucket.com/albums/aardvark_1964
Only affects Firefox since updating to v7.0.1. NB Safari is unaffected on the same machine.
Have flushed the cache, reset JS, etc etc.

Hi Bart,
I also found a real easy way to clean out Finder in this link:
http://lifehacker.com/308898/clean-up-finders-open-with-menu
The MacApper weblog details how to clean out Finder's Open With menu so that uninstalled and duplicate applications don't bog down the list of apps you want to use.
Home/Library/Preferences/com.apple.LaunchServices
and trash it (you can back it up if you want)
If you want to get even more granular with your Open With Menu, check out this link:
http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20030730161311391

APEX 4.2 aligning issue of Stop and Start Grid Layout item

My APEX application application is in the process of moving from 4.0 to 4.2. I am experiencing an issue with aligning (left margin justified) of Stop and Start Grid Layout items that have a border around them. Earlier I had an issue with the border itself not showing up in the 4.2 application. I was able to resolve that with a workaround by adding inline code in the CSS section of the page: #P23_OFFICE_START_TBL {width:682; border:1px solid #369; margin:5px;}. This created the border which I needed, but there are 2 Stop and Start Grid Layout items that are indented and not aligning with the border of the previous line. I have tried a number of different things but none of them have worked. This seems like a very simple issue to fix but I am having a tough time resolving it.
I tried to put the item in question in a different grid, which corrected the indention but then I lost the border around the item. It seems that the above CSS code does not work on the new grid. I also tried to put attributes such as margin-left:5px; float: left; clear: left; float: left, in the CSS code but that did not work, too.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Ajay K

I deleted and added back the Stop and Start Grid Layout items not aligning properly. This worked. Apparently, the 4.0 to 4.2 upgrade did not handle/convert these items properly. Deleting and adding them back resolved the issue.

Ties, Durations, And Volumes In Score Editor

I am trying to tie two notes of different pitch, using the method of extending the duration of a first note to lap over the second. While this produces a tie and an extended or (sort of) legato sound if the notes are the same pitch, and produces a proper graphic tie in the score editor, it does not do this when I attempt to tie two notes of different pitches. In that case, a tie is produced by the Score Editor, but the extended duration first note is duplicated in the second note position, along with the original second note—so three notes tied! Clearly this is not what I want. It occurred to me that this method of extending the first note's duration was doing exactly the same thing when the notes are the same, but I don't see it show up in the editor.
Here are two images of what I am seeing in the Score Editor
Bottom pair of notes—first extended and tie created.
Top pair, first note duration not extended. No tie.
Here, I've extended the first note in the top pair, to get
the tie, but as you see it duplicated the note in the
second position too, and of course changed the sound
from what it should be.
So, questions:
1. Am I doing the right thing, achieving ties by extending the durations of notes in this manner? It seems to work just fine when the notes are the same, but I am wondering if, instead of generating an extended single note, I am getting a doubled note (or louder note). It seems this is the case. Is there a better way to make ties (both in sound and in the editor) without doubling notes?
2. How do you do ties between different pitched notes—again without generating a third note? Is this handled differently than tying to notes of the same pitch?
Thanks.

Just to add:
Most instruments can only manage a slur between notes of different pitches... on a brass instrument it's using a different valve fingering with out tonguing the note but there's still a slight bump with the new fingering. The exception of course is the trombone, because of a slide that can actually glissando between notes. Valve instruments can bend and half-valve notes but that a special technique. A piano or organ can't do what you describe... orchestral string instruments (as well as fretless electric bass) can but that's a function of the instrument and is usually written as a slur with bowing instructions.
It's never written as different pitches tied.

[SCORE] How to give several notes a different color?

Hello,
Is it possible to give all notes with a certain pitch a different color in the score window? So let's say all the A# notes are red, and all the others remain black. How can I accomplish this?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Sure!
Colours can be assigned in the Staff Style editor, or you can assign by pitch, velocity, voice assignment and the like.
See
Score Editor:View:Colours and Layout:Colours.
For details see p995 and 1257 of the pdf manual.
To get only 1 note a different colour, you could do it by velocity, or, if that's not helpful, changing the default Pitch Colours.
HTH
CCT

Arranging Big Band Charts with Score Editor

Ahhh, the score editor is so untuitive. The way it's programmed, so that you have to space the note just right to get the desired result. And sometimes ya gotta switch the notes and try again and then retry... Ayayayaya. Well, anyways, my question is: Is there a way I can prefrerize the score editor so that the notes/rests I select are put in, and that I can make my own ties (the ties are reallly frusturating). I'm arranging a chart for my big band, so.... go Logic!
Cheers!
-Tad-

Have partially answered my own question- have worked out how to change note sizes to the smaller cue-type display, not quite sure how to designate them non-playing though still appearing in the score though.

Score Editor: Force Syncopation and Note Alignment issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for