Score system in vendor evaluation

Hi,
Please explain how scoring system works in vendor evaluation for criteria Delivery and sub criterias on time delivery and qty reliability.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Jana

Please check these answered links:
Vendor Evaluation Score ..
Vendor Evaluation Score ...???
Vendor Evaluation-Delivery Score
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 21, 2010 1:58 PM

Similar Messages

Score problem in vendor evaluation for sub criteria Quantity Reliability...

Hi Experts,
For the subcriteria Quantity Reliability i have calculated the score like below,
pur.order quantity - 1000.
receipt qty - 900.
var = 900-1000/1000 *100 = 10%.
10% var = 90 pts.
old score - 41
new score -90
smoothing factor - .30
41 * (1-.30) + 90 * .30 = 56. Am getting,but
system calculates 59.how.Is there any configuration problem.
I hardly need to solve this.pls anyone help me.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Ranganayahi Chandirasekaran on Nov 4, 2009 12:17 PM

Hi,
to answer your question satisfactorily we need to knwo about more details.
what are the minimum delivery factors, overdelivery and underdelivery tolerances?
these all are considered in the score calculations.
to adjust the score the system gives high priority to average score that is 1-smoothing factor.
if you have just updated the score for same delivery then the score calculation is different.
in case of further queries please find the MMSIV document you could find it in some fo the posts.
you will get some more information in one of my earlier posts.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Vendor Evaluation Score ...???

Hi MM Gurus,
My client requires score calculationfor the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format
and what is mean by Market Price.. where can i get this in Vendor Evaluation.
Thanks in Advance,
Anthyodaya.

HI,
The information you need from vendor evaluation is contained in the criteria on-time delivery.
The market price is a dat you introduce in the info record.
There is a very good information in the online help:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cde414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

MM Vendor Evaluation Score Card Program RM06LBAT

Hello MM gurus,
I am trying to figure out what record selection criteria SAP uses in calculating a score in the Vendor Evaluation score card program RM06LBAT. We have our applicability period set to 090 days in configuration. Does the program look at records in S013 for the last 090 days from the run date of RM06LBAT? Or does the program look at records in S013 since the last vendor score card was generated? Is applicability period used in running the score card? How is the applicability period used in SAP for vendor evaluation?
We would like to run the score card program every 090 days (or once per quarter) and have SAP only evaluate scores for activity generated over the 090 day period.
I appreciate your assistance.
Regards,
Julie

HI,
The information you need from vendor evaluation is contained in the criteria on-time delivery.
The market price is a dat you introduce in the info record.
There is a very good information in the online help:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cde414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Hi All,
I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
Thanks

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
see below
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

Vendor Evaluation-market price

Hi Experts,
How to maintain market price in the system for vendor evaluation based on sub-criteria Price level??? What is the best and easiest practice. Please share your experience.
Your replies will be appriciated with points.
Regards,
santosh

Hello,
The market price is entered in the transaction MEKH.
About the Price level:
This score is computed with the information between inforecords and Market Price.
This compare is making for each material that a vendor has provided.
This information is not contained in table S013 and is only calculated during an evaluation and saved in the table ELBP.
Inforecords are per vendor X material tables EINA and EINE, field NETPR.
Market Prices are per Material X Material Group.
I hope this information help.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Delete score in vendor evaluation

Hi, everyone!
How can i delete vendor evaluation score for delivery?
After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
Thanks

Hi,
GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
>07 automatic determination from system audit.
but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
with regards
Yashodhan

Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
Charudatta

Hi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores

Dear Gurus,
On what basis are the scores assigned for the percentage that is assigned. For Eg. what do you mean by the following:
Percentage   Score
20.0-        10
10.0-        65
2.0-       100
2.0        100
10.0         50
what does 20.0- mean and how is a score of 10 assigned to the same.same is the case for all the entries.
Kindly explain me the entire process as to what does this percentage mean. Assume that we are evaluating the vendor based on Price.

Hi,
The system calculates the scores for vendor evaluation as follows.
Calculating the Overall Score
The system derives the overall score from the scores for the various main criteria, taking the
weighting factors assigned by Purchasing in the system settings for each main criterion into
account.
The following example explains this process:
Example
The table below shows the scores for a vendor and their weighting factors:
Main criterion Score Weighting factor
Price 70 40
Quality 85 25
Delivery 50 10
General service/support 50 5
Converting Weighting Factors into Percentages
To make the weighting factors clearer to the user, the system converts them into percentages.
1. The system adds the factors together and equates the total with 100 %:
40 + 25 + 10 + 5 = 80 equals 100 %
2. To express the individual weighting factors as percentages of 100%, the system first divides
100% by the sum of the weighting factors:
100 / 80 = 1.25 %
3. Then the system multiplies the weighting factors the buyer assigned to the main criteria by
this figure:
40 x 1.25 = 50.00 %
25 x 1.25 = 31.25 %
10 x 1.25 = 12.50 %
5 x 1.25 = 6.25 %
4. The following are the results of percentage of overall score
Main criterion Score Percentage of overall score
Price 70 50.00 %
Quality 85 31.25 %
Delivery 50 12.50 %
General service/support 50 6.25 %
However, internally, the system uses the weighting factors to compute the overall score.
1. The scores for the main criteria are multiplied by their weighting factors.
70 x 40 = 2800 points
85 x 25 = 2125 points
50 x 10 = 500 points
50 x 5 = 250 points
2. Total points = 5675.
3. This total is divided by the sum of the weighting factors:
5675 / 80 = 70.94 points
The vendor is awarded an overall score of 71 points
Please go though this link for clear understanding.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Manik

System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

HI....
I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
Regards
SARFRAZ

Hi,
Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic criteria for each percentage vainance
Hope this fulfils your query
Regards

Quality score and vendor evaluation?

Dear Sapient,
Can any one help me to know how quality score in QA11 or QA12 is hitting vendor evaluation programs?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Hi
Rejection/complaint : This comes from the Following calculation.
Only consider the Q2 type of notification score.
If no complaint then this is 100 otherwise following formula:
The complaints score is calculated from the number of complaints against the vendor, according to the following formula:
QSc = QScmin + (QScmax - QScmin) * (1 - (N * K) / (F * U))
QSc = QScmin if (N * K) > (F * U)
QScmin = Lower limit for QSc
QKZmax = Upper limit for QSc
N       = Number of Q-notifications in the applicability period
K       = Estimated nonconformity costs
F       = Share of business volume for QSc calculation
U       = Sales of the vendor in the applicability period
K is maintained at
QCC0>Quality notification->Information system--->Define NC cost for Vendor Evaluation
Audit:
The audit score is either the average quality score for the audits or is made up of the quality scores for the most recent audits. You can also enter an audit score manually.
This is 07 inspection type average score.
Again depend upon UD score of 07 inspection type.
I hope this will help
Regards
Sujit

Vendor evaluation - score working

Hi guys,
Does any one have any write up /info on how the system arrives at the scores of criteria and sub criteria during vendor evaluation. I am looking for detailed info all all criteria s /subcriterias.
Also let me know how i can change the weighting percentage for various criteria s.
rgds

Hi,
Refer following links;
[Subcriterion in Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Fully Automatic Scoring|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Scoring Methods for Subcriteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Calculating Overall Score/Scores for Main Criteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]

Score system in vendor evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for