Screen size smaller than 1024x768?

Hi all,
I'm working on a project that is being done on 1024x768
screen size. I don't get to resize the screen as with widescreen
monitor it gets a bid odd when resized for a non-native resolution.
So my questions is, do you reckon that there are many computer out
there with screen res less than 1024x768? The project is going to
be sent to an target audience in England, medium to large company
sized. Thanks for your input

thanks. Went back for a second look and they are indeed the same size. I was thrown off by how the menu in the newest version is structured. Is that new menu style available as an update, or only specific to the new classics?

Similar Messages

How do I play a Keynote 09v5.3 slideshow on my iMac at a size smaller than fullscreen?

How do I play a Keynote09v5.3 slideshow on my iMac at a size smaller than fullscreen?

Hi Gary
Thanks for a conclusive answer.
Regards
Orchardhouse

Why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

Lonion wrote:
hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?Both are different.
Flash logs size depends on parameter DB_FLASHBACK_RETENTION_TARGET , how much you want to keep.
Archive log files is dumped file of Online redo log files, It can be either size of Online redo log file size or less depending on online redo size when switch occurred.
Some more information:-
Flashback log files can be created only under the Flash Recovery Area (that must be configured before enabling the Flashback Database functionality). RVWR creates flashback log files into a directory named “FLASHBACK” under FRA. The size of every generated flashback log file is again under Oracle’s control. According to current Oracle environment – during normal database activity flashback log files have size of 8200192 bytes. It is very close value to the current redo log buffer size. The size of a generated flashback log file can differs during shutdown and startup database activities. Flashback log file sizes can differ during high intensive write activity as well.
Source:- http://dba-blog.blogspot.in/2006/05/flashback-database-feature.html
Edited by: CKPT on Jun 14, 2012 7:34 PM

Physical disk IO size smaller than fragment block filesystem size ?

Hello,
in one default UFS filesystem we have 8K block size (bsize) and 1K fragmentsize (fsize). At this scenary I thought all "FileSytem IO" will be 8K (or greater) but never smaller than the fragment size (1K). If a UFS fragment/blocksize is allwasy several ADJACENTS sectors on disk (in a disk with sector=512B), all "physical disk IO" it will allways, like "Filesystem IO", greater than 1K.
But with dtrace script from DTrace Toolkit (bitesize.d) I can see IO with 512B size.
¿What is wrong in my assumptions or what is the explanation?
Thank you very much in advance!!

rar wrote:
Like Jim has indicated me in unix.com forum, That cross-post thread happens to be:
http://www.unix.com/unix-advanced-expert-users/215823-physical-disk-io-size-smaller-than-fragment-block-filesystem-size.html
You could have pasted the URL to be polite ...

Exported video size smaller than original video size. How do I keep the original size?

I exporting a video from Adobe Premiere CS6 today, and I noticed the video was about 1/2 times smaller than the original video I put in. I then uploaded the video on YouTube, and the size was still the same. I tried to change the preset to 1080p 29.97, 1080p 25, etc. and the same with 720p, and 480p, but the size only changed slightly.
How do I keep the original size after exportation of videos?

More information needed for someone to help... please click below and provide the requested information
-Information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840
Also, exactly what are you editing, and what are your export settings?
Also, The tutorial list in message #3 http://forums.adobe.com/message/2276578 may help

Why is my "Combined PDF" file size smaller than the original files?

Hello!
I am trying to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF. Each file is 32mb, however when I use acrobat to combine them, the newly created "combined" file is only 19mb. I believe I've taken the necessary steps to ensure no degradation is happening (i.e. selecting Large File Size in the options panel), but I am still puzzled as to how two files can be put together as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance!

When you combine a file it does a "Save As" operation. This re-writes all of the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean up the file, whereas the single files may have had multiple saves which when you look at the internals of the PDF file simply add on to the end of the file. In other words you get a more cleanly written and optimized file that is also saved for Fast Web View.

Apple TV screen is smaller than TV size

Hello. We just installed a sound bar on our TV and now the HDMI cable for the Apple TV is plugged directly into the receiver, vs the TV. Now the Apple TV screen is a smaller box centered in the middle of the TV, about half the size as the actual TV. Any idea how to fix this?

Check your TV settings.

How to get a custom screen capture size smaller than my slide size

Hi,
I'm trying to capture a fixed sized screen on my computer (a softphone) for use in a youtube hd size format training video. I can't seem to figure out how to customize the size of my screen capture so it fits only around the phone and leaves me blank space on my slides. Any ideas?
Thanks!
Nikkie

Hi there
This should be simple. From Captivate, when you set it up to record you simply define an area there.
Or are you possibly saying you cannot consistently get a size set so that you can record many different projects perhaps over several days? If that's the case, perhaps you need to investigate using something like the freeware Sizer utility to configure things a bit.
Click here to visit the Sizer page
Cheers... Rick

Record screen captures smaller than the screen size of my captivate tutorial

Hello,
I'm fairly new to captivate, but what I want to do I thought
was very simple. I'm using the Record feature to record screen
captures navigating applications, but when I use them in the
captivate tutorial I'm creating, I don't want them to show full
screen. I would like my template frame (with company name, logo,
and some buttons) to remain on the left side of the screen, and
show the recording in a box on the right. How can I do this?
Thanks!
Michaela

This thread has been cross posted to two different forum
categories. Please direct any replies to the post in the category
where the question was first asked. You may do this by
clicking
here.
Forum posting guidelines may be read by
clicking
here if you are curious as to why cross posting is a bad
thing.

Database Block Size Smaller Than Operating System Block Size

Finding that your database block size should be in multiples of your operating system block size is easy...
But what if the reverse of the image below were the case?
What happens when you store an Oracle Data Block that is 2 KB in an 8 KB Operating System Block? Does it waste 6 KB or are there 4 Oracle Data Blocks stored in 1 Operating System Block?
Is it different if you use ASM?
I'd like to introduce a 2 KB block size into a RAC Exadata environment for a small set of highly transactional tables and indexes to reduce contention on blocks being requested in the Global Cache. I've witnessed horrendous wait times for a plethora of sessions when a block was highly active.
One index in particular has a column that indicates the "state" of the record, it is a very dense index. Records will flood in, and then multiple processes will poll, do work, and change the state of the record. The record eventually reaches a final state and is never updated again.
I know that I can fill up the block with fluff by adjusting the percent free, percent used, and initrans, but that seems like a lazy hack to me and I'd like to do it right if possible.
Any thoughts or wisdom is much appreciated.
"The database requests data in multiples of data blocks, not operating system blocks."
"In contrast, an Oracle block is a logical storage structure whose size and structure are not known to the operating system."
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25789/logical.htm#BABDCGIB

But what if the reverse of the image below were the case?
What happens when you store an Oracle Data Block that is 2 KB in an 8 KB Operating System Block? Does it waste 6 KB or are there 4 Oracle Data Blocks stored in 1 Operating System Block?
Is it different if you use ASM?
I'd like to introduce a 2 KB block size into a RAC Exadata environment for a small set of highly transactional tables and indexes to reduce contention on blocks being requested in the Global Cache. I've witnessed horrendous wait times for a plethora of sessions when a block was highly active.
One index in particular has a column that indicates the "state" of the record, it is a very dense index. Records will flood in, and then multiple processes will poll, do work, and change the state of the record. The record eventually reaches a final state and is never updated again.
I know that I can fill up the block with fluff by adjusting the percent free, percent used, and initrans, but that seems like a lazy hack to me and I'd like to do it right if possible.
Any thoughts or wisdom is much appreciated.
"The database requests data in multiples of data blocks, not operating system blocks."
"In contrast, an Oracle block is a logical storage structure whose size and structure are not known to the operating system."
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25789/logical.htm#BABDCGIB
You could have answered your own questions if you had just read the top of the page in that doc you posted the link for
>
At the finest level of granularity, Oracle Database stores data in data blocks. One logical data block corresponds to a specific number of bytes of physical disk space, for example, 2 KB. Data blocks are the smallest units of storage that Oracle Database can use or allocate.
An extent is a set of logically contiguous data blocks allocated for storing a specific type of information. In Figure 12-2, the 24 KB extent has 12 data blocks, while the 72 KB extent has 36 data blocks.
>
There isn't any 'wasted' space using 2KB Oracle blocks for 8KB OS blocks. As the doc says Oracle allocates 'extents' and an extent, depending on your space management, is going to be a substantial multiple of blocks. You might typically have extents that are multiples of 64 KB and that would be 8 OS blocks for your example. Yes - it is possible that the very first OS block and the very last block might not map exactly to the Oracle blocks but for a table of any size that is unlikely to be much of an issue.
The single-block reads used for some index accesses could affect performance since the read of a 2K Oracle block will result in an 8K OS block being read but that 8K block is also likely to be part of the same index.
The thing is though that an index entry that is 'hot' is going to be hot whether the block it is in is 2K or 8K so any 'contention' for that entry will exist regardless of the block size.
You will need to conduct tests using a 2K (or other) block and cache size for your index tablespaces and see which gives you the best results for your access patterns.
You should use the standard block size for ALL tablespaces unless you can substantiate the need for a non-standard size. Indexes and LOB storage are indeed the primary use cases for uses non-standard block sizes for one or more tablespaces. Don't forget that you need to allocate the appropriate buffer cache.

Why Are Lightroom File Sizes Smaller Than Elements Equivalents?

I have been struggling to get good quality thumbnail sized images at small enough file sizes for a website. The only problem is that the versions I have done through Lightroom via the Web Module using the Flash template, will only allow a maximum width size of 191 pixels, whereas I'm looking to achieve 250 pixels wide. Doing it through Elements image resize box gets me the size I want, but for a decent quality, the file size is much larger.
Out of curiosity and for comparison, I made the Elements versions the same dimensions as the Lightroom ones. In order for the file sizes of the Elements ones to come even close and yet not as small as the Lightroom versions, I had to reduce the Jpeg quality to zero. This rendered them unusable.
I can't understand why two related applications doing exactly the same thing can differ so wildly. Can someone tell me what is going on?

Hmmm??
Not To Sure??
But I will try to find out..
Keep you posted about that.
Phillip

IPhoto library size smaller than original collection

I've seen several iphoto library size questions but nothing seems close to my own situation. If anything, it's mostly the other way around. Apologies if this has already been covered but I've searched long and hard!
I have my photo collection in two places- an iPhoto library and separately stored in a finder folder called "Photos". For backup purposes and in case anything goes wrong, I prefer to have them doubled up like this. My iPhoto library is 7.96GB when viewed in finder, whereas the folder "Photos" is 8.95GB. The same number of images are in both. Can anyone shed some light onto why this would be the case? There are no other items contained in either collection, movies etc., just the same amount of photos in various folders within folders. Surely the iPhoto library would be at least as big, if not bigger with thumbs, photos modified etc?

I would expect the iPhoto Library to be significantly bigger than the folder tree so something is not right.
Are you running a Managed or a Referenced Library?
A Managed Library, is the default setting, and iPhoto copies files into the iPhoto Library when Importing. The files are then stored in the Library package
A Referenced Library is when iPhoto is NOT copying the files into the iPhoto Library when importing because you made a change at iPhoto -> Preferences -> Advanced. The files are then stored where ever you put them and not in the Library package. In this scenario you are responsible for the File Management.
BTW: Storing the files in a folder tree and iPhoto on the same disk is a waste of space and not a back up. A back up needs to be on a separate disk, at least. The most common problems are disk issues. Such a set up offer no protection whatever from that.
Regards
TD

Why are some video frame sizes smaller than others?

I am copying a number of short amateur digital video movies onto a single DVD. All are 16:9 ratio, but whereas most fill the screen on my computer monitor and 16:9 ratio television, some appear as a smaller picture - still 16:9 ratio, but with a black border around all four sides of the picture. Can someone please explain what causes this, and is it practical to enlarge the smaller picture movies to match the full screen ones, or will the image quality be noticeably poorer? If it's practical to do, how do I do the enlarging? Thank you.

Are all clips from exactly the same source, using exactly the same settings?
Read Bill Hunt on a file type as WRAPPER http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0
What is a CODEC... a Primer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/546811?tstart=0
What CODEC is INSIDE that file? http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0

Sometimes the screen is full-screen or smaller than minimum, same for Thunderbird

Every now and then the window-size is collapsed, and can only be maximized. (Firefox 8.0)
This also happens at Thunderbird 8.0

You could try using Firefox's Safe Mode to reset your toolbars. Not sure whether this is a toolbar problem, but it's probably worth a try.
First, I recommend backing up your Firefox settings in case something goes wrong. See [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing+up+your+information Backing up your information]. (You can copy your entire Firefox profile folder somewhere outside of the Mozilla folder.)
Next, check this article on how to start Firefox in
[https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode Safe Mode] and use the dialog to reset toolbars.
Any luck?

Is the 5c screen size bigger than 4s? i have vision problems

I have vision problems and need the biggest screen Apple makes. Does the 5c's screen make a significant difference versus the 4s ?

Hey blueliner15!
I have a site for you that can help you answer that question:
Apple - iPhone - Compare Models
http://www.apple.com/iphone/compare/
Thanks for being a part of the Apple Support Communities!
Regards,
Braden

Screen size smaller than 1024x768?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for