SCREENS LOOK DIFFERENT WHEN Accesing GUI through IE
Hi Gurus,
I am new to ITS MOBILE, and i have a situation now.
When i am trying to acess the GUI based applications, one screen looks different from the other, i mean when i go LM01 and go to INBOUND process, the screen there looks WEB based,but when i go to a different screen from the dynamic menu, the screen looks different there GUI based.
I am wondering is it something to do with the STYLE???,/am i missing something???, can anyone please explain how do you make the screens lokk alike???, imean either WEB based/GUI based??
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Srik
with the full hostname on url it works ok.
Similar Messages
-
In FF4, why does my website looks different when www is omitted
''locking as a duplicate - https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715''
My site looks different when I use www in the address and when I omit www. Look at http://www.dynapipe.co.uk and http://dynapipe.co.uk.
This doesn't happen with FF3 or IE7, 8 or 9 or Google Chrome, only FF4Oops, responded to a duplicate of your post over here: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715
-
Photos in Develop module look different when switching to library module
Hello everyone this is my first post on adobe. I ran into a problem today for the first time using lightroom 5. I recently purchased lightroom 5 about 2 weeks ago and have been in love using it. I have ran into 0 problems until today. I uploaded some new photos and was going through them under the develop module editing the photos and what not. When I am done editing I usually go to the library module and export them.
Today I tried to do that exact thing and ran into this issue: the colors in the photo are changing ever so slightly when I switch to the library module and are not exporting exactly as I edited them in the develop module.
I have tried changing the contrast/clarity to see if it would remain when switching and it does. But for some reason the yellow on the flower in the picture becomes less vibrant when seen/exported from library module. It is very frustrating because I spend alot of time editing the photo in a develop module and every transfers but the colors it seems. It becomes more dull and less vibrant.
It is not the photo itself. I think it is something wrong with my lightroom? I uninstalled and reinstalled and the same issue keeps happening.Just to clarify. When you compare the exported image to the original inside LR do they look the same when viewed together in the Library module, and how about when both are viewed in the Develop module? Are you using a wide gamut monitor and do you also use a hardware monitor calibrator? All of these things affect how images looks in LR and some are fixable, but others are not as Web Weaver posted.
There is also another issue that can cause the Library module view and exported images to look different than they do in the Develop module:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/afm8rbh6tnc31
The solution is to view the image at 1:1 (100%) view size. You can also use more conservative Sharpening settings (i.e. lower) and more aggressive Luminance Noise Reduction settings (i.e. higher), which will significantly decrease the view difference. -
Hello all,
I am sorta new to taking Raw photographs and I have been been using Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw to edit. When I take my photos (I am using a Canon t2i) I have it set to save a raw and a jpg. When I view these images in Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw I notice a clear difference in the jpg and raw (I understand the whole concept behind raw vs. jpg. so im not questioning why one looks different) It is obvious all the adjustments that were applied to my jpg. vs the natural raw. My question is: When I view the same two images in the software that came with my camera, canon digital photo professionals, the canon and raw look almost identical.... My assumption is that canon is applying the same "adjustments" to my raw as it did to the jpgs? Has anyone used these two programs and noticed this?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
MichelleCan't say I'm an expert on DPP myself either. I've only run it a few times myself.
If you're seeing Photoshop freeze just by looking at the File Info tab, that's certainly not expected and you should start a tread specifically to discuss that. The forum may be able to help you get that working.
I happen to like the color my camera delivers in its embedded JPEGs (which I use to quickly review shots via IrfanView). Starting with that color in Camera Raw by default just feels very natural and integrated.
Without a specific custom profile to help you with the task, here's my suggestions for the next best thing:
1. Take an image with a range of different colors in it.
2. Open the embedded JPEG also using whatever means you have to do so.
3. Open it also in Camera Raw and make sure you're using the Camera Raw default parameters.
4. Go into the Camera Calibration tab (little camera icon), and choose the Camera Standard profile as provided by Adobe.
5. Tweak the various sliders so as to match the color between what you're seeing in the JPEG and Camera Raw.
6. Save new Camera Raw defaults.
Some notes:
Make sure you leave the White Balance on As Shot, since storing a specific white balance is probably not going to be helpful.
Test your settings and repeat the above to tweak them as needed using other images.
Keep in mind that not every application does proper color-management. IrfanView can be set up to do so, and I don't recall whether you have to tweak a default setting to make it do that or not (it's been a while).
Hope this helps!
-Noel -
'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play' (makes timing errors)
In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play' Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.
You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option. -
Peachpit "Motion5" p. 54, Step 11 drop-down issue - my screen looks different
This problem requires the Peachpit "Motion5" book to reference because it is copyrighted and I can't take a picture of the page in question.
The subject page shows a drop-down window with "sliders" for Red, Blue, and Green and one is supposed to enter in new values for each color. HOWEVER, since the book is old and based on an earlier version of Motion5, this is a PROBABLE cause as to why the dropdown I'm getting looks different from the book's version.
So, either the dropdown has changed, OR, "I'm not getting it." (the latter is a real possibility although I've tried every option I can think of)
NOTE: I've tried to find Errata information for the book and there are only a few items listed, none of which covers this issue.
My screen shot:
The lesson requires that one type in 0.63 for Red, 0.35 for Green, and 0.06 for Blue. Unfortunately, one cannot enter in a decimal point, ergo, this cannot be done.
The screen shot is for Motion 5.1
Any ideas?The book said to "... click the disclosure triangle ...." and I took that to mean the triangle to the right of the Remap colored square. This I tried numerous times and wound up with the color scheme shown in your right screen shot.
This has been a while so I don't remember the exact place, but after clicking on the arrow on the left side of the Remap (or maybe it was the colored square like you showed) there was a better window that opened:
This one allowed me to dial in exactly the paramerters that was asked for.
WHEW!
What an ordeal. But it's over and figured out now. A relief.
Like you mentioned, I also was waiting for the publisher, or some other publisher, to come out with a Motion 5.1 book but couldn't wait any longer. If they continue to print and sell the old "5" version you'd think they'd at least have a good Eratta page somewhere that would provide the changes as well as fill in the holes in the procedures. Certainly, if this was used for class instruction they would know what questions the students struggled with. Oh well.
Currently I'm up to page 65 and struggling with Step 13 to get the bright orange/brownish-yellow color they show. I'm only able to get a light version of the general background color. Tried the grey also, and ditto there. Just isn't working. I'm getting the colors I want in the color box but not on the screen. Sort of a partial. The HUD looks just like the picture in the book.
In Step 12 it says to "click the Add Filter pop-up menu ..." but I can't find where they're talking about it. I've looked everywhere. Need to take a rest and work on this tomorrow.
Thanks for the support.
Edit: What happened? What do you mean? This didn't help me - Geeze, I wrote it! Need to get some rest. -
Exported pictures look different when uploaded to websites.
I noticed that exported pictures from Lightroom uploaded to Facebook or Shutterfly look different that when viewing the same exported pictures on my pc. Why is that? The exported pictures were not adjusted, maybe only cropped and red eyes were removed. Yet the colors appear different when viewing the same pictures on Facebook or in Shutterfly. If I upload exact the same picture directly from my picture folder, the colors look different. I wonder why this is happening.
Export as sRGB will always help; however most browsers are not colour managed so the colour reproduction can vary anyway even when using sRGB. Only Safari is fully managed, Firefox works up to a point (it only uses icc v2 profiles, not v4 it will be OK with LR as LR presently exports to the v2 version of sRGB) or browsers don't honour profiles at all. Calibrating your monitor is also an important factor here and a hardwear device is required to do this correctly.
How an image looks in non colour managed applications cannot be a basis for jusdging an image so only fully colour managed applications (such as LR or PS) should ever be used for processing. -
I used my MBP today at work to present a PowerPoint presentation using the projector my office has. I have no idea what the brand of the projector is -- but now the appearance of all of my programs and desktop is different.
The sizing is not what it was set to, and swiping larger or smaller does nothing to fix it.
The font looks different, bolder, messier.
Does anyone know how to fix this? Or why it changed after being connected to another device?
Help! This is a trivial question -- but I loved the settings I had -- and the options in the setting menus don't have anything helpful.I didn't even notice that. I think that fixes it. Thanks.
-
Muliple logon screens when accesing EP through webdispatcher
Can login if i access directly to the servers. but when going through webdispatcher i get same login screen whithout any message.
(on webdisp administration screen i can see all servers registered, so it seems to work)
where can i look for?
Thanks in advance
Xaviwith the full hostname on url it works ok.
-
How do I make my screen look better when watching movies?
I notice when I watch movies on my Macbook that there are negative parts when I'm sitting on an angle. Is there any way to solve this through calibrating it or the right lighting. This doesn't happen on my sister's older Powerbook G4 that has a matte screen.
Try not watching it on an angle and also try recalibrating it. Play around with the calibration until you find a setting that looks good for movies. Then save it. You can switch to it whenever you watch movies then.
Dave M.
MacOSG Founder/Ambassador An Apple User Group iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support' (designed exclusively for an iPhone/iPod touch) -
Page formatting looks ok in iweb put looks different when published
Hi
I just got a new MAC Book Pro, and am still using the iweb o8. Today I made a web page that looked very much like a resume...indents , bullets, alignment. it looks great on the screen in iweb...but when I publish it and access through safari...all of the indents etc are gone or changed. Any clue what I am doing wrong? Thanks for any suggestionsNo I haven't tried that but I will try it later tonight. Should I do it in word and then convert that doc to a pdf and then use that. The reason I ask is that I did turn the iweb page into a pdf because I wanted to proof it in paper form (old fashioned, I guess)...and when I printed the pdf document is was huge..
or maybe it looks small on iweb and in the actual web page and the pdf is normal size I was using 14pt type so it was readable on iweb...but when I printed the pdf it didn't fit on a page width wise, and the printed copy looked like 14 pt type....but the iweb page looked about 10 pt.
anyway I will try your suggestion and let you know
I tried to take screen shot...to show the misalignment of the text....but I couldn't get the screen shot into this screen. -
Pictures look different when imported
For some reason when I import pictures into iphoto they look a little darker/warmer and not as crisp. Has anyone seen this before? Is there anyway to correct this issue?
Thank you,
JBNJBN77
Sounds like the pics are not color managed, or differently color managed from iPhoto. Where are these pics from?
Regards
TD -
Screen looks cracked when applying pressure
Hi,
I just unboxed my new iPhone 3G. And I immediatly noticed discoloring a bit below the middle of the screen. Looked like a laptop screen does when You put a finger on it. I figured it would wear off after a little use. But now I've also noticed a long crack showing up along the discoloring when I push buttons on the screen etc.
I've filmed it with photobooth. View it here http://dyresitter.dk/iphonecrackedscreen/
Anyone else who had similar sub surface cracks?
Cheers
Message was edited by: MyschetzkyGuess not
-
Looks different when previewing in browser. Help?
<!DOCTYPE
html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><!--
InstanceBegin template="/Templates/UA.dwt" codeOutsideHTMLIsLocked="false"
-->
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled
Document</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
body
font: 100%/1.4 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
margin:
0;
padding: 0;
color: #000;
background-color:
#000;
background-image:
url(Logos_for_Ultra_Aircare_central_vacuum/Ultraaircare%20background.jpg);
/* ~~
Element/tag selectors ~~ */
ul, ol, dl { /* Due to variations between
browsers, it's best practices to zero padding and margin on lists. For
consistency, you can either specify the amounts you want here, or on the list
items (LI, DT, DD) they contain. Remember that what you do here will cascade to
the .nav list unless you write a more specific selector. */
padding:
0;
margin: 0;
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p {
margin-top: 0; /*
removing the top margin gets around an issue where margins can escape from their
containing div. The remaining bottom margin will hold it away from any elements
that follow. */
padding-right: 15px;
padding-left: 15px; /* adding the
padding to the sides of the elements within the divs, instead of the divs
themselves, gets rid of any box model math. A nested div with side padding can
also be used as an alternate method. */
a img { /* this selector removes
the default blue border displayed in some browsers around an image when it is
surrounded by a link */
border: none;
/* ~~
Styling for your site's links must remain in this order - including the group of
selectors that create the hover effect. ~~ */
a:link
color:#414958;
text-decoration: underline; /* unless you style your
links to look extremely unique, it's best to provide underlines for quick visual
identification */
a:visited {
color: #4E5869;
text-decoration:
underline;
a:hover, a:active, a:focus { /* this group of selectors will
give a keyboard navigator the same hover experience as the person using a mouse.
text-decoration: none;
/* ~~
this container surrounds all other divs giving them their percentage-based width
~~ */
.container {
width: 80%;
max-width: 1260px;/* a max-width may be
desirable to keep this layout from getting too wide on a large monitor. This
keeps line length more readable. IE6 does not respect this declaration.
min-width: 902px;/* a min-width may be desirable to keep this layout from
getting too narrow. This keeps line length more readable in the side columns.
IE6 does not respect this declaration. */
background: #FFF;
margin: 0
auto; /* the auto value on the sides, coupled with the width, centers the
layout. It is not needed if you set the .container's width to 100%. */
/* ~~
the header is not given a width. It will extend the full width of your layout.
It contains an image placeholder that should be replaced with your own linked
logo ~~ */
.header {
background-color: #051852;
/* ~~
These are the columns for the layout. ~~
1)
Padding is only placed on the top and/or bottom of the divs. The elements within
these divs have padding on their sides. This saves you from any "box model
math". Keep in mind, if you add any side padding or border to the div itself, it
will be added to the width you define to create the *total* width. You may also
choose to remove the padding on the element in the div and place a second div
within it with no width and the padding necessary for your design.
2) No
margin has been given to the columns since they are all floated. If you must add
margin, avoid placing it on the side you're floating toward (for example: a
right margin on a div set to float right). Many times, padding can be used
instead. For divs where this rule must be broken, you should add a
"display:inline" declaration to the div's rule to tame a bug where some versions
of Internet Explorer double the margin.
3)
Since classes can be used multiple times in a document (and an element can also
have multiple classes applied), the columns have been assigned class names
instead of IDs. For example, two sidebar divs could be stacked if necessary.
These can very easily be changed to IDs if that's your preference, as long as
you'll only be using them once per document.
4) If
you prefer your nav on the right instead of the left, simply float these columns
the opposite direction (all right instead of all left) and they'll render in
reverse order. There's no need to move the divs around in the HTML source.
.sidebar1
float: left;
width: 20%;
padding-bottom: 10px;
background-color:
#041237;
.content {
padding: 10px 0;
width: 80%;
float:
left;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 11px;
/* ~~
This grouped selector gives the lists in the .content area space ~~
.content ul, .content ol {
padding: 0 15px 15px 40px; /* this padding
mirrors the right padding in the headings and paragraph rule above. Padding was
placed on the bottom for space between other elements on the lists and on the
left to create the indention. These may be adjusted as you wish. */
/* ~~
The navigation list styles (can be removed if you choose to use a premade flyout
menu like Spry) ~~ */
ul.nav {
list-style: none; /* this removes the list
marker */
border-top: 1px solid #666; /* this creates the top border for the
links - all others are placed using a bottom border on the LI
margin-bottom: 15px; /* this creates the space between the navigation on
the content below */
ul.nav li {
border-bottom: 1px solid #666; /*
this creates the button separation */
ul.nav a, ul.nav a:visited { /*
grouping these selectors makes sure that your links retain their button look
even after being visited */
padding: 5px 5px 5px 15px;
display: block; /*
this gives the link block properties causing it to fill the whole LI containing
it. This causes the entire area to react to a mouse click.
text-decoration: none;
background: #8090AB;
color:
#000;
ul.nav a:hover, ul.nav a:active, ul.nav a:focus { /* this changes
the background and text color for both mouse and keyboard navigators
background: #6F7D94;
color: #FFF;
/* ~~
The footer ~~ */
.footer {
position: relative;/* this gives IE6 hasLayout
to properly clear */
clear: both;
background-color: #041237;
color:
#FFF;
font-weight: 100;
font-variant: normal;
text-transform:
none;
font-style: normal;
font-size: 10px;
font-family: Arial,
Helvetica, sans-serif;
height: 30px;
width: 902px;
padding-top:
10px;
padding-right: 0;
padding-bottom: 10px;
padding-left: 0;
/* ~~
miscellaneous float/clear classes ~~ */
.fltrt { /* this class can be used
to float an element right in your page. The floated element must precede the
element it should be next to on the page. */
float: right;
margin-left:
8px;
.fltlft { /* this class can be used to float an element left in
your page. The floated element must precede the element it should be next to on
the page. */
float: left;
margin-right: 8px;
.clearfloat { /* this
class can be placed on a <br /> or empty div as the final element
following the last floated div (within the #container) if the #footer is removed
or taken out of the #container */
clear:both;
height:0;
font-size:
1px;
line-height: 0px;
-->
</style><!--[if lte IE
7]>
<style>
.content { margin-right: -1px; } /* this 1px negative
margin can be placed on any of the columns in this layout with the same
corrective effect. */
ul.nav a { zoom: 1; } /* the zoom property gives IE
the hasLayout trigger it needs to correct extra whiltespace between the links
</style>
<![endif]--></head>
<body>
<div
class="container">
<div class="header"><!-- end .header
--><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="header" --><img
src="Templates/warranty_sticker_2004.jpg" width="902" height="302" /><!--
InstanceEndEditable --></div>
<!-- InstanceBeginEditable
name="links" -->
<div class="sidebar1">
<ul
class="nav">
<li><img src="links/home.jpg" width="181"
height="44" /></li>
<li><img
src="links/ultraaircare.jpg" width="181" height="44" /></li>
<li><img src="links/pricing.jpg" width="181" height="44"
/></li>
<li><img src="links/allergiesandasthma.jpg"
width="181" height="44" /></li>
<li></li>
<img src="links/contact us.jpg" width="181" height="44" />
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<!-- end .sidebar1 -->
</div>
<!-- InstanceEndEditable --><!--
InstanceBeginEditable name="content" -->
<div
class="content">
<h1>Instructions</h1>
<p>Be
aware that the CSS frfjfyukuhjiklui9liol;ko;i90or these layouts is heavily
commented. If you do most of your work in Design view, have a peek at the code
to get tips on working with the CSS for the liquid layouts. You can remove these
comments before you launch your site. To learn more about the techniques used in
these CSS Layouts, read this article at Adobe's Developer Center - <a
href="http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts">http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts</a>.</p>
<h2> </h2>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<!-- end .content -->
</div>
<!-- InstanceEndEditable
--><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="footer" -->
<div
class="footer">
<p>Copyright UltraAircare
<!-- end
.footer -->
</p>
</div>
<!--
InstanceEndEditable --><!-- end .container
--></div>
</body>
<!-- InstanceEnd
--></html>
So I just started a website for a project that I have to do. So far everything has been going well. Everything shows up perfect in liveview in Dreamweaver CS5, but now that I'm previewing it in internet explorer, this is how it shows up. Help anyone? Any ideas?Link please.
Bob -
Image viewed in Photoshop CC looks different when viewed in Elements 11 Organizer, why?
I'm viewing a Nikon raw file (.nef) in Bridge CC, Camera Raw, and then in Photoshop CC. In Camera Raw I've made some adjustments before viewing it in Photoshop. For cataloging I prefer to use Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer (there are several reasons why that I won't go into here). When I get the image looking the way I want it to look in Photoshop and subsequently view the image in Elements Organizer the image in Organizer is not a good match to what is displayed in Photoshop. I particularly notice that nice blue sky tones appearing in Photoshop are shifted toward cyan in Elements Organizer. What is causing the mismatch in image color between the two Adobe products?
I've also noticed that the new Radial Filter that's available in the latest Camera Raw is not processed by Elements Organizer 11. Would this be processed in Elements 12?I'm viewing a Nikon raw file (.nef) in Bridge CC, Camera Raw, and then in Photoshop CC. In Camera Raw I've made some adjustments before viewing it in Photoshop. For cataloging I prefer to use Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer (there are several reasons why that I won't go into here). When I get the image looking the way I want it to look in Photoshop and subsequently view the image in Elements Organizer the image in Organizer is not a good match to what is displayed in Photoshop. I particularly notice that nice blue sky tones appearing in Photoshop are shifted toward cyan in Elements Organizer. What is causing the mismatch in image color between the two Adobe products?
I've also noticed that the new Radial Filter that's available in the latest Camera Raw is not processed by Elements Organizer 11. Would this be processed in Elements 12?
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to offset speed change in frame rate conforming?
Hi all. I am conforming video from about 25fps to 30 fps in cinema tools, before editing in FCP. Does any one know of a formula, or calculator tool that would tell me the speed change percentage to use, to get the clip to play in normal speed while e
-
Unable to unlock screen when i receive message notification in locked screen
Hi, I am facing a software issue in IOS7 in iPhone5. Whenever i receive Message Notification in locked screen mode, i am unable to slide & unlock the scrren. I can open control centre, but cannot touch anything. I can open Notification, but again of
-
Multiple Member Access Profiles
I am not clear on the interaction between member access profiles. A client would like the following situation. Entity and Category are secured. 1. R/W to Asia region (E), R/W to Actual and Budget (C) 2. Ability to turn off W access to Budget, but
-
I'm using windows vista 32 bit
I have downloaded Adobe Flash Player but, cannot get it to run.
-
Right click send to mail?
Is there a way to right click a file and have an option that will attach it to a new email? Is there a way to add more files to the same email using the above technique? Even better would be if I could right click on the Safari Downloads window and s