Screes Resolution 800600 and 1024768

hi all
i need trigger to solve Screes Resolution in run fmx !
if developed the program under 800*600 res. ok run
but when change the resolution some of items can't display>
[email protected]
bye

Shadi Zaal,
The screen resolution is a aspect of the Operating System. To change in dynamically is technically possible, but it is probably not worth the time and money to research how to do it. You will need to dig through Microsoft's website (assuming you are running on Windows) to find information on how to send changes to the display control panel applet. More than likely, all you will find is a way to open the applet, not directly change the resolution.
I think a better option would be to establish a resolution standard and require your users to adopt this resolution as their default.
Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.
Craig...

Similar Messages

Adf uix and 800*600 resolution

We need to develop an application with adf uix and 800*600 resolution.
It seems that uix rendering is not so fine with 800*600 resolution.
What is the suggested workaround to this problem?
Do we need to customize the look and feel (and what customization steps do we need to perform) or what else?
Thanks in advance, Mauro

800*600 did work until for a couple of days ago when it did start saying "sync. out of area"
Its a siemens something screen... 5 years old...
i did look at the cable to the screen one "pigg" of the 15 "piggs" are missing.. could it be some problem there... all other res. are working without a problem..
the screen should work at 800*600 at 100hz

How can i set the resolution on my imac ''27 in to 1024*768?

hello,
i'm new to imac
how can i set the resolution on my imac ''27 in to 1024*768?
its only gives me to options
1- 1280*720
2-800*600
thanks

My mid-2011 27" iMac, ML 8.3 has 1024x768:

Tecra M5-106: Display with 1024 * 768 resolution is not clear

I buy Toshiba Tecra M5-106, it is 14.1" screen.
When i set the screen resolution to 1024 * 768, every thing comes not clear... also the fonts is not good. Could be the sharpness or other?
Any one see this before, or have solution for this?
Solving this is highly appreciated.
Ragards,

Hello Bualim,
The M5 is a really great notebook with very good characteristics. There are versions of this notebook with a NVIDIA graphic card (NVIDIA® Quadro® NVS 110M 128 MB DDR2) and others with an INTEL chipset. I don't know which one your model has unless you post the model code that is printed under your notebook.
According to some research I made, the native resolution of your monitor should be 1400x1050 so you should leave your notebook to work in this resolution rather than something lower like 1024x768.
You might say, "the fontsize is too small in 1400x1050", nevertheless you should NOT change into lower resolution (the common procedure done on the old CRT Monitor) but have the size adjusted through Window's "Appearance settings" on the "Display properties". This is the right way to go on a TFT screen (notebook): Always keep the maximum (your native) resolution and adjust the size of icons and fonts through software settings within windows.
Ok, getting back to your problem now:
=Have you all display drivers loaded into your system? (The correct ones for your graphic card?)
=Is your Graphic card recognized correctly in the "Device manager menu" without any "yellow conflict" signs?
You will find the most (Toshiba supplied) recent Display drivers in the dedicated upgrade section for your model. Here is a tiny-link to the Toshiba Display driver for your model. Make sure to choose the correct chipset (nvidia OR INTEL).
http://tinyurl.com/24gmry
Regards,
electrochain

Dll file to change monitor resolution to 1024*768

hi,
i want to change my computer monitor resolution to 1024*768 programatically. If anybody have this .dll file please suggest me so that i can call this dll in labview apllication and will set my PC resolution to 1024*768 . Please do the needful.
Regards
Falgandha Mohire

G Toolbox has a set of VIs can do this:
Enumerate Display Mode: Enumerate all supported display modes(width, height, color depth, & frequency) on your computer;
Get Display Mode: Get current screen resolution, color depth, and frequency;
Restore Display Mode: Restore the screen resolution, color and frequency to the registry values dynamically;
Set Display Mode: Change screen resolution, color and frequency dynamically, with option of change registry settings. If no change, the previous settings can be restored with Restore Display Mode, or reboot.
George Zou
http://webspace.webring.com/people/og/gtoolbox

Message Note : "Resolution screen should be 1024 by 768 pixels"

Kindly advice :
when processing transaction code ZSD1ALL01 in MySAP Upgrade version 6.0 of SAP, message appear "Resolution screen should be 1024 by 768 pixels". how do we maintain this setting?
Thank you.

To change or check the settings for your screen resolution, please follow these steps:
- From your task bar at the bottom-left corner of your Windows 98, Windows 2000, or Windows XP computer, click once on "Start."
- Select "Settings."
- Select "Control Panel." A window should open up with the control panels for your operating system.
- Select "Display" and then "Settings" from the tab menu.
- Using your mouse, click down, hold, and slide the horizontal bar toward the right, where it reads, "More."
- Slide the bar until it reads "1024 by 768" or greater.
- It is recommended that you use a fairly high resolution setting that will allow you to use the most screen space possible, anything from 1024 by 768 to 1280 by 1084. Anything higher than this will probably make some things too small to read on your screen, although the degree of detail will be higher.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

800*600 screen resolution not showing full adobe window

Hi,
One of my customers is currently running Adobe Captivate 2
and due to difficulties with vision is using a screen on 800*600
resolution. When you open pretty much any of the menus/options the
screens that pop up fill the screen past the 800*600 limits so
buttons down the bottom are not showing unless you drag the window
up at which time the top of the window vanishes off the screen. I
have tried on my computer and it does the same thing.
Is this something that Adobe Captivate 2 fails to do, does
Adobe Captivate 3 fix this issue, or are there options to fix this
with Captivate2?
Cheers
Andrew

Hi Andrew and welcome to our community
I just tested Captivate 2 by configuring my laptop to the
same resolution of 800x600. Captivate seemed to work fine that way
and I didn't observe anything being lost or cut off. So my question
here is to ask if the person is running Captivate in windowed mode
or full screen mode. If windowed, try double-clicking the title bar
to switch to full screen.
Cheers... Rick

Resolution of 600 DPI and Illustrator

Someone would like a small 1 inch by 1 inch logo for invoices at 600 DPI. However I understand that illustrator doesnt work in DPI or PPI since it's vector. Would I have to transfer the small image over to photoshop. I did try and save a 1 inch by 1 inch logo at 600 PPI, however when I saved the image it was no longer 1 inch by 1 inch. It had increased significantly in size regardless of what file format I saved the image as.
I would really appreciate help in this matter as Im unsure how to proceed.
Thanks

Its confusing to say the least!
Here's a universal truth that will help aleviate the confusion:
Think about this term: Pixels Per Inch.
Per Inch. You have some things (pixels). A given number of them occupy a given distance (an inch).
How do you do that? By scaling the things (pixels) so that a desired number of them fit within a given distance (inch).
Per Inch is just a scaling value. Understand and remember that universal truth, and it will clear up alot of the confusion.
Once a raster image is saved, it contains a fixed number of pixels. In order to draw a given number of the image's pixels within a measured distance, the raster image has to be scaled. Change the scale of the image, and you change the number of its pixels which occupy a measured distance.
Now be aware of these universal truths (aka facts):
Raster image file formats are different. Some formats record in the file the intended scaling value (if one is provided) that is in effect when the file is saved. Others don't.
Programs which export raster images are different. Some programs write the scaling value into the raster image file (if the raster image format supports that). Others don't.
Programs which import raster images are different. Some programs pay attention to the stored scaling value (if any). Others ignore it.
Someone would like a small 1 inch by 1 inch logo...
First issue: Is the logo square? Is the design's height equal to its width?
...for invoices...
This suggests that "someone" intends to import the raster image into some program used for invoices. That could be any of a kazillion different programs, from Word to Excel, to FileMaker Pro, to QuickBooks, to....you name it (but you didn't). You always need to know your customers' intended usage and be at least somewhat familiar with the target software's capabilities regarding importing artwork.
...at 600 DPI....
This suggests that "someone" wants a raster image with a color depth of 1-bit. That means a raster image in which each pixel can be either black or white, and nothing else. This is suggested because that is a commonly-used scale factor for 1-bit raster images that are intended for use in common programs like office applications which have very limited graphics import capability, and because it is the most common hardware resolution of most office laser printers. In other words, 1-bit raster images scaled to 600 PPI is a kind of "lowest common denominator" for commonplace office environments.
But the above suggestion is based on the assumption that "someone" knows what he/she is talking about, which is never a safe assumption. If the image is of any color depth higher than 1-bit, then 600 PPI is ridiculous. In other words, if the image file contains any pixels of any color at all, then 600 PPI is absurd for use as an invoice imprint. This is because any higher color-depth image will have to be halftone screened by the printer in order to render it with any decent-looking fidelity. That means rendering the image as a grid of variable-size dots. But the printer cannot actually print variable-size dots. It only prints fixed-size printer spots. To render variable-size halftone dots, it "fakes it" by "building them up" out of its fixed-size printer spots.
Moreover, even if the logo (the actual design) contains nothing but black and white, but you save the raster image file at a higher color-depth anyway, then 600 PPI is still just as ridiculous. Grayscale, RGB, and CMYK raster images are saved with a color depth of 8 bits per pixel per channel. When the printing device receives an 8-bit image, it is going to try to screen it (print it as halftone dots). That means that the printer will not use one printer spot for each pixel, but several. So there is no reason to provide as many image pixels as printer spots that the printing device can physically print in one inch--unless the image is not going to be rendered by halftone (or stochastic) screening (i.e.; a 1-bit image).
However I understand that illustrator doesnt work in DPI or PPI since it's vector.
But Illustrator's raster export filters do indeed work in PPI, because they are exporting raster images, which are nothing but pixels. In order to export a raster-based rendering of the vector-based artwork (which is all a raster image is), Illustrator has to write some number of pixels into the raster image file.
Your vector-based path is a mathematical description of a curve. In order to render it as a raster image file, or even to print it on a printer, or even to display it on your computer monitor as you work in Illustrator, it has to be rendered as pixels. In effect, your vector-based paths are "overlaid" onto a grid of pixels. The pixels which land inside the path are turned on. The pixels ouside the path are turned off. This is basically what occurs when a vector path is printed, when a vector path is exported to a raster image, or even on-the-fly while you view your vector paths on your monitor.
That's what vector-based paths are: Mathematical instructions to determine which squares of a raster grid to turn on.
In other words, all vector-based artwork is eventually rasterized; it's just a question of when. The scaleability advantage of vector graphics does not derive from the myth that it does not involve raster-based imaging; it derives from the fact that the rasterization is postponed until output time.
In still other words, all your vector-based artwork is going to be overlaid onto a raster grid, the squares of that grid will be colored accordingly, and that finished raster image is all anyone is ever going to see of your vector-based formulae. It's just that which grid is to be overlaid is left undetermined until the "overlay" is performed.
So when you export your vector-based artwork to a rastter-based image format, that's what you're doing: You're telling Illustrator to overlay the vector paths onto a particular raster-based grid (so many rows, so many columns of pixels, at some scale).
That's the difference between vector-based artwork and raster-based artwork: A raster image is a pre-determined rectangular grid of a fixed number of color values. A vector graphic is a set of mathematically-described shapes which can be overlaid onto any rectangular grid, so that the number of color values is dependent upon the particular grid used, be it the grid of your monitor's pixels, the grid of a printer's spots, or the grid of a raster image file that you export.
Would I have to transfer the small image over to photoshop.
No, you can export directly from Illustrator to any of several common raster formats.
I did try and save a 1 inch by 1 inch logo at 600 PPI, however when I saved the image it was no longer 1 inch by 1 inch. It had increased significantly in size regardless of what file format I saved the image as.
It "had significantly increased in size" where? When viewed in what program?
When this occurs, the raster image is simply not being scaled so that its pixels measure 1/600th of an inch. As explained above, some raster image formats do not record the scaling value. Even if the raster image file does record the intended scaling value, some programs into which you import the raster image will ignore it.
So since you can't really control whether the scaling factor is going to be ignored, to meet the stated requirements (600 PPI when scaled to 1 inch), you simply need to concern yourself with providing the correct number of pixels and it's up to the recipient's software to scale them to the desired measure.
For example, if your vector-based artwork measures 1 inch according to Illustrator's rulers, then export the raster image at 600 PPI. If your vector-baed artwork measures 2 inches according to Illustrator's rulers, then export a raster image at 300 PPI, and you'll be exporting the same number of pixels. You can either do the math, or you can simply export a raster image by specifying the desired number of pixels directly.
But do not forget to consider the question of color-depth. 600 PPI at final rendering scale is not necessary for anything other than a 1-bit image.
If the logo in question consists of nothing but a single solid color:
In Illustrator, scale it to 1 inch.
Do not color it. Use only solid black and white fills and strokes. No grayscale. No graduated fills, strokes.
Export it to a raster image format at 600 pixels (in the measured direction), with a color depth of 1-bit. You can do this by either specifying the nubmer of pixels, or by specifying the scale factor, 600 PPI. Understand, this means using a raster image format which supports 1-bit (for example, TIFF) and which the recipient's program can import. (Most common office productivity programs can import TIFF.)
When the recipient imports it into his invoice program, if it appears enlarged, it just means his program is ignoring the embedded scale factor. He can just scale it to 1" and it will then be 600 PPI.
The above scenario is common. A typical 600 SPI (printer Spots Per Inch) laser printer will turn on one of its printer spots for each black pixel in the image, thereby rendering the image as accurately as it can.
But even if the logo contains no graduated tones, and you apply some color to it (the recipient's logo spec color, for example), then you'll have to export it to a higher color depth in order to include that color. Even if you export it as grayscale, you will still be exporting 8-bit color values for each pixel. In that case, it may look fine on the recipient's monitor, but when he prints it, the printer will have to screen the image in order to render it using halftone dots which, again, are larger than actual printer spots.
The same applies, even if you use only solid black in the design but still export it to a higher color depth (grayscale, RGB, or CMYK) raster image. The recipient's printer is going to recognize the incoming raster image as 8-bits of data per pixel and assume that it has to halftone it; so again, it will not be printing one printer spot for each image pixel.
All this is why Illustrator's so-called "Save For Microsoft Office" feature is really nothing but another interface for its PNG export filter. Many AI users (mostly beginners) want to do the impossible: export their Illustrator drawings to something that ordinary office programs can import, display, and print with fidelity.
But that's really a pipe-dream. Office applications don't understand the kind of vector-based curve math which Illustrator (and all similar programs) generate. So the Save For Office interface resorts to a raster image export.
Office users don't understand the caveats and limitations of CMYK color mode, lossy JPEG compression, or color depth and don't want to have to muck with them. They just want something that they can plop into their word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation programs and have it "look good" on screen and when printed on their low-resolution office inkjets and laser printers.
Too many Illustrator users also don't want to have to think about color depth.
So the Save For Office interface defaults to RGB PNG, turns off transparency (even though PNG supports it) because some specific Microsoft Office apps before a particular version have a problem with it, and does not present the user with much in the way of other PNG-capable options (such as 1-bit grayscale).
Why am I bringing this up? To point out that Adobe's own default and explicit "recommended" export for office-type programs is an 8-bit RGB format which, again, obviates the appropriateness of 600 PPI. In RGB, 300 ppi provides more than enough pixels for the office-using recipient to scale the image to 400% without evident pixelation because even 150 PPI is higher than the screen ruling of most office printers.
So 600 PPI at the actual final on-page scale is sensible for simple office uses like ploping a black logo onto a form like an invoice that is goingto be printed in one ink (or toner) assuming 1-bit color depth; but not otherwise.
JET

1024 768

Hello Is it possible to make a video ouput with 1024/768 not 1440 1080
in premier element 8
Thank you for help
Philippe

No. 1024 x 768 is not an allowable size for MPEG2. For full detail see here: Wikipedia. We could help you better if you explain exactly what it is you want to do with the file.
To summarise the wikipedia article information on resolutions:
DVD Standards
The DVD-Video standard uses MPEG-2 video, but imposes some restrictions:
Allowed Dimensions
720 × 480, 704 × 480, 352 × 480, 352 × 240 pixel (NTSC)
720 × 576, 704 × 576, 352 × 576, 352 × 288 pixel (PAL)
DVB Standards
Application-specific restrictions on MPEG-2 video in the DVB standard:
Allowed resolutions for SDTV:
720, 640, 544, 528, 480 or 352 × 480 pixel, 24/1.001, 24, 30/1.001 or 30 frame/s
352 × 240 pixel, 24/1.001, 24, 30/1.001 or 30 frame/s
720, 704, 544, 528, 480 or 352 × 576 pixel, 25 frame/s
352 × 288 pixel, 25 frame/s
For HDTV:
720 x 576 x 50 frame/s progressive (576p50)
1280 x 720 x 25 or 50 frame/s progressive (720p50)
1440 or 1920 x 1080 x 25 frame/s progressive (1080p25 = film mode)
1440 or 1920 x 1080 x 25 frame/s interlace (1080i50)
1920 x 1080 x 50 frame/s progressive (1080p50) possible future H.264/AVC format
ATSC Standards
ATSC allows the following video resolutions, aspect ratios, and frame/field rates:
1920 × 1080 pixel (16:9, square pixels), at 30p, 29.97p, 24p, 23.976p, 60i, 59.94i.
1280 × 720 pixel (16:9, square pixels), at 60p, 59.94p, 30p, 29.97p, 24p, or 23.976p
704 × 480 pixel (4:3 or 16:9, non-square pixels), at 60p, 59.94p, 30p, 29.97p, 24p, 23.976p, 60i, or 59.94i
640 × 480 pixel (4:3, square pixels), at 60p, 59.94p, 30p, 29.97p, 24p, 23.976p, 60i, or 59.94i
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

XGA 1024*768 with 60Hz

I would use my old iBook for slideshows on tv. But my tv can only play 1024*768 with 60 hz (not 75 hz). How can i change the refresh-rate?

How are you connecting the iBook to your TV?
If your iBook has an analog or S-video output, go into System Preferences > Monitors.
You should see that there is an "Arrange" tab. Click it and you will see two monitor icons.
One is for the computer the other is for your TV. You can change the refresh rate on the TV icon's settings there. It is not possible, or neccessary to change the refresh rate on the computers LCD display.

Default VGA driver can let me increase resolution between '800x600' to '1024X 768'?

Hi,
I was told that the initial VGA is an standard,
800x600 or similar, only gives me the option to show image but not some other possibilities like external display, clone display and those stuffs.
The specific VGA (FX 5200) driver, give to your rig the "possibility" to address all the image process to an specific device, in this case, the FX 5200 and add some extra functions like external display (at different resolutions),
clone display, extend display...and those stuffs.
However, I noticed that while using the default VGA driver, then I could increase 'resolution from '800X600' to 1024x768 Pixels. Also, the 'colour quality' to 32Bit or 16Bit, although it is intial, standard
VGA, I could change the resolution.
Thus, my questions are:
First: what benefit is there from instlling the driver of the default VGA as long as I can change the screen resolution into '1024X 768' while using default VGA driver, which means that icons, and display would be OK??
Second: With using a default VGA driver on
any Computer, there are only '800x600' to '1024X 768'? (I.e. The resolution of all default monitor can be only between 800x600 and '1024X 768'?
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life.

For best performance and appearance, it's prudent to install the latest video adapter driver available from the
support web site of the manufacturer of the video chip.
Carey Frisch

HT1040 trying to make an ibook and have 800 photos, want format of 8 photos/page, but default is not that- "create" the initial book from iphoto "album" it loads less than 800 pics and then when i change layout i have blanks.

trying to make an ibook and have 800 photos, want format of 8 photos/page, but default is not that- "create" the initial book from iphoto "album" it loads less than 800 pics and then when i change layout i have blanks.
if i clear the book so that it is all blanks and then try to load in the pictures i have it loses the chronology of the pictures that i had established in the album.
is there a way to import photos into an ibook template and keep the original order of the photos without having to do them one at a time?
also, is there a way to insert a photo rather than just dragging it? i have tried the cut and paste funciton but it doesn't seem to work, the target site doesn't seem to register with iphoto.
many thanks for your help.

Photos are added to book in chronological order. So if you want to add them to a book in the order you have placed them manually in an album do the following:
1 - select all the photos in the album.
2 - use the Photos ➙ Batch Change ➙ Date menu option as shown here. Select any date and add 1 minute between photos.
3 - select just one photo from the album and create a book from it.
4 - in the book click on the Options button ➙ Book Settings button and make sure the checkbox for Auto-layout pages is unchecked.
5 - drag the album with your book photos onto the book icon and they will be imported into the Photos tray of the book in your pre-determined order but not into the pages themselves.
OT

HT201338 Can I connect a firewire 400 to firewire 800 adapter and then a firewire 800 to Thunderbolt adapter(standard Thunderbolt to firewire adapter) together to digitize video from a miniDV video camcorder?

I have a 10 year Canon MiniDV camcorder that I used to connect via firewire to digitize the data. Now my IMac only has a Thunderbolt connector and my camcorder uses the older firewire 400 standard. I would like to digitize the video into my IMac. How can I do this?

I did a little looking around and found a Thunderbolt to Firewire 800 adapter, and then a Firewire 400 to 800 adapter, but no Thunderbolt to Firewire 400. Amazon and Apple stores had the Thunderbolt to Firewire 800 cable and Amazon had the Firewire 400 to 800 adapater.
Wherever you get the cables, ask them if it will work OK with what you want to try and do - if they don't know make sure you can return if there is a problem. I think it will because the Thunderbolt side is so much faster than what the camera can pump out to it. If it were the other way (Thunderbolt device to a Firewire computer I would expect that to fail since the Firewire could never keep up with the data rate of the incoming Thunderbolt device).
Maybe if you have a local Mac user group or a friend with an older mac with a firewire 400 port you could do it this way too?
Good luck

Error code 600 and 500 on autodiscover in Exchange 2010

Hi,
I have a problem on Exchange 2010 Autodiscover, the error code 600 and 500, Please see below message and please help to fix this error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"
?>
<Autodiscover xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/autodiscover/responseschema/2006">
<Response>
<Error Time="09:28:57.8739220" Id="2715916636">
<ErrorCode>600</ErrorCode>
<Message>Invalid Request</Message>
<DebugData />
</Error>
</Response>
</Autodiscover>
Thanks,
ShutMo

Hi,
The website https://host.abdomain.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
Shows the following error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<Autodiscover xmlns= "http://schemas.micosoft.com/exchange/autodiscover/responseschema/2006">
<Response>
<Error Time="09:28:57.8739220" Id="2715916636">
<Errorcode>600</Errorcode>
<Message>Invalid Request</Message>
<DebugData/>
</Error>
</Response>
</Autodiscover>
Test Email Autoconfiguration
<
I have do "Test Email Autoconfiguration" and have the following log:
Guessmart POP: server pop3.aadomain.com, port = 110, initializing
Guessmart POP: server aadomain.com, port = 995, initializing
Guessmart POP: server pop3.aadomain.com, port = 110, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, starting
Guessmart POP: server aadomain.com, port = 110, initializing
Guessmart POP: server aadomain.com, port = 995, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, starting
Guessmart POP: server aadomain.com, port = 110, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, starting
Attempting URL https://host.abdomain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml found through SCP
Autodiscover to https://host.abdomain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml starting
GetLastError=0; httpStatus=500
Autodiscover request completed with http status code 500
Autodiscover to https://host.abdomain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml failed (0x80004005)
Autodiscover to https://host.abdomain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml starting
Guessmart IMAP: server mail.aadomain.com, port=143, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, failed (0x800CC4005)
Guessmart IMAP: server mail.aadomain.com, port=143, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, starting
Guessmart POP: server pop.aadomain.com, port = 110, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, failed (0x800CCC1A)
Guessmart IMAP: server imap.aadomain.com, port 143, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, failed (0x800CCC1A)
Guessmart IMAP: server imap.aadomain.com, port 143, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=No, starting
Guessmart POP: server pop.aadomain.com, port 110, ssl=Yes, tls=No, spa=Yes, starting
then I received another failed.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Shutmo

Ora 600 and ora 7445 error in oracle 10g r2

hi all,
we are using Oracle 10g r2.
os is windows 2003 server,
ram is 4 gb.
front end is java .
we got a below mentioned errors.
i got the RA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qerghFetch:inc], [], [], [], [], [], [], [],
and ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x61F04AC9] [ADDR:0xC] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
and Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn errors.
for aug 3 11.42.47 we got a ora 600 error after that through front end (java) users can't able to connect the database.the not able to executed the query session disconnected error.
what is reason for theis error . how it will rectifiy.?
pls advice.Below i attached the alret log message .
Sun Aug 02 04:04:24 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Sun Aug 02 05:48:10 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Sun Aug 02 05:49:10 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Sun Aug 02 07:38:49 2009
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1732
Current log# 3 seq# 1732 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
Sun Aug 02 07:44:14 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Sun Aug 02 07:45:14 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Sun Aug 02 22:00:26 2009
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1733
Current log# 1 seq# 1733 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
Mon Aug 03 07:08:15 2009
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1734
Current log# 2 seq# 1734 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
Mon Aug 03 09:28:23 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 09:30:27 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 11:42:47 2009
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\orcl\udump\orcl_ora_6012.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qerghFetch:inc], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Mon Aug 03 13:20:00 2009
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1735
Current log# 3 seq# 1735 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
Mon Aug 03 16:07:07 2009
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\em_2\rdbms\trace\orcl_ora_4756.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x61F04AC9] [ADDR:0xC] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
Mon Aug 03 16:07:11 2009
Process m000 died, see its trace file
Mon Aug 03 16:07:11 2009
ksvcreate: Process(m000) creation failed
Mon Aug 03 16:08:37 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 16:10:40 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 17:25:05 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 17:27:11 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 17:32:19 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 17:33:24 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 18:52:08 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 18:54:09 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 19:05:33 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Mon Aug 03 19:09:02 2009
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\em_2\rdbms\trace\orcl_ora_5132.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C34126B] [ADDR:0x0] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
Mon Aug 03 19:10:27 2009
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn
Error 0 in kwqmnpartition(), aborting txn

Hi reshumakur
As this is your PRODUCTION system THEN_ The best help to offer in case of ORA-600, and ORA-7445 is to open SR with metalink. Submit with the SR the following
1- Alert log
2- Trace files (in ur case e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\orcl\udump\orcl_ora_6012.trc: and e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\em_2\rdbms\trace\orcl_ora_4756.trc:)
3- Describe what was happening when you had these errors.
Try to avoid free help when you have ORA-600 and ORA-07445. This errors could be becuase of BUGS. Oracle Support will know this from the call stack in the trace file.
Then Do your best to patch 10.2.0.4 and the latest CPU patch.
Good Luck

Screes Resolution 800*600 and 1024*768

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Screes Resolution 800600 and 1024768