Script to start an app in /usr/local/bin

I am new to trying AppleScript. I use gnupg and want to start an app called "gpg-agent" located in /usr/local/bin/ . I want to pass it an arg, something like --daemon and maybe another ... first I want to see if it is even running ...
But when I compile, AppleScript prompts me to locate gpg-agent. That browse function only lists certain folders and never hidden nor /usr/ ....
Any help please?

Oy!
well, golly ...no, just wanna scribble something to make my gpg work for encryption. Need to get something started outside the program. Scfripting sounded nice since I didn't really want to do C++
where's a good forum.
thanks for the patience

Similar Messages

  • Simple script in /usr/local/bin just won't start - SOLVED

    I put this really simple script for starting psi into my /usr/local/bin, set it a+xr and added /usr/local/bin to my path. However, I just can't start the damn thing.
    Here's the script itself (I really don't think there's something wrong with it, since if I type it in the shell it works fine):
    #!/bin/zsh/
    #start psi, never stop
    while true;
    do psi;
    done
    Here's my users $PATH:
    ─$ print $PATH
    /bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/kde/bin:/opt/mozilla/bin:/opt/qt/bin
    Here's the permissions of the script:
    $ ls -lah /usr/local/bin
    total 4.0K
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Dec 15 03:52 ./
    drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 240 Dec 10 18:55 ../
    -rwxrwxr-x 1 kamagurka users 60 Dec 15 03:51 psi.start*
    And here's what happens when I try to execute it:
    $ psi.start
    zsh: command not found: psi.start
    So, I'm either missing something incredibly obvious, or something freaky's going on here. I hope it's the former.
    EDIT: I had no idea where to put this, so I put it into Desktop Env since I'm trying to start a graphical app, but feel free to move it.
    EDIT: Yea, I was being a little dense.

    smoon wrote:Not sure if that's the problem, but try removing the trailing / (slash) from your script's shebang.
    See, something really obvious. Stupid, even. You can see, I don't do a lot of scripting.

  • How do I delete Unix scripts in /usr/local/bin/

    Well, I download a program call mpgtx (mpeg editor). After install, it put all its files to /usr/local/bin/, and there are unix scripts, mpgdemux, mpgcat..etc. So I just wander how I can delete them. Can just do rm mpg* from Terminal?
    Pls, help.

    I don't even HAVE a /usr/local/bin folder on either of my Leopard installs. One install does have a /usr/local folder, but everything in it was installed by the latest version of Privoxy, the other install doesn't have a /usr/local folder at all. So you won't mess up anything from the system. Whether you'll mess up some third party something or other you have installed only you can know. I suspect they probably don't take up much room, you could check that. If the amount of space consumed is trivial, you could just leave them.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

  • /usr/local/bin/pdf2ps: gs: not found

    GS 8.54
    Solaris 10
    Oracle 11.5.10.2
    I'm having problem regarding the pdf2ps which it seem cannot find the pdf2ps. When i try to print the pdf file in apps using pasta.
    The printer confirm support pasta and post script.
    The report submited is complete with warning. This is the error inside the log file.
    /usr/local/bin/pdf2ps: gs: not found
    Pasta: Error: Preprocess failed. Command=/usr/local/bin/pdf2ps /v99/app/applmgr/abghfuat/applcsf/out/ABGHFUAT_e2sscorhrmdba02/ABG_APXPBFOR_XML_BMO_2495102_1.PDF /v30/app/applmgr/abghfuat/comn/temp/pasta18270_0.tmp
    Pasta: Error: Preprocess or Print command failed!!!
    APP-FND-00500: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from routine FDUPRN. An error occurred while AOL tried to spawn the print process
    Cause: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from the OSD routine FDUPRN. An error occurred while AOL tried to spawn the print process.
    .pdf file being generated, but failing when calling Pasta.

    Hi,
    Since you indicate a version number for ghostscript in your post (8.54), I'm guessing the issue is that gs is not in the path for the applmgr user. On my system (Linux, not Solaris, so there may be differences), gs and pdf2ps are in different directories.
    Try running the following command as the applmgr user:
    which gsIf you don't get the path to gs as output from that command, you will need to add the path to gs to the path environment variable of the applmgr user.
    Regards,
    John P.

  • $PATH missing '/usr/local/bin'

    $PATH missing '/usr/local/bin' in /etc/login.defs and /etc/profile.
    I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3 and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!).  This, not being in my $PATH by default.
    Please consider adding this line to future ARCH 0.6 or beyond for WORKSTATION users:
    # /etc/profile
    export PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin"
    Thanx.

    Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3
    A very wise decision to use this great browser :-) ... and I'm even serious about that.
    Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!).  This, not being in my $PATH by default.
    For some reason it is in my /etc/profile ... but I don't remember if I put it there or not.
    Firstly, (and as already mentioned more or less) I can see arguments why AL does not include /usr/local/bin by default (mainly because there is nothing there when only installing AL packages).
    But OTOH, this is the beauty of AL : you can (and are even supposed to) configure your system as you like by editing the files in /etc. I guess that's why I don't remember, because the first thing I would do if need be is editing /etc/profile ;-) ...
    Oh, but something (very general !) to consider : if you want to keep your system "Unix-style", don't put every posible PATH in /etc/profile, but put it in ~/.profile (or whatever shell you are using). If you are the only user, it does not really matter. But in a "true multi-user Unix system" you should not have /funky/path/bin in /etc/ ... not that /usr/local is exotic ....this is more of a general note.
    sarah31 wrote:but imho if there is a PKGBUILD for a desired app (such as dillo)
    yes, the PKGBUILD for dillo works fine, however, last week they released the latest version 0.7.3 which Mt.Tam-Luxer tried to install ( ... hint ... hint ... package maintainers ... :-) ... ). It was not quite clear from your post if yo wanted him to modify the PKGBUILD script or to just use it.
    Oh, and besides changing pkgver, the source should now point to http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2

  • How to put g95 in usr/local/bin?

    Hi all,
    I am trying to compile a program called elmerice.  When I type the "make compile" command, I get the following message:
    elmerf90-nosh -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
    /usr/local/bin/g95 -O5 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=nocona -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -falign-loops -I. -Ibinio -I/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents//share/elmersolver/include -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
    /Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents/bin/elmerf90-nosh: line 18: /usr/local/bin/g95: No such file or directory
    I did install (I think successfully) g95 using macports, i.e. the command "sudo port install g95" but apparently it is not in /usr/local/bin, which seems to be where elmerice wants to find it.
    One complicating factor might be that /usr/local/bin does have gfortran it.
    It seems like elmerice will only use g95.  Can I put g95 in the /usr/local/bin directory from wherever I have it now, and if so, how?  Or can I just reinstall g95 in that directory?
    Thanks,

    Try creating a symbolic link from /usr/local/bin/g95 to wherever MacPorts put it. That is probably the easiest solution. Ideally, you would fix the makefile, but that wouldn't be easy.

  • /usr/local/bin

    Hello everyone,
    Whenever i am installing any s/w from source by compiling,its executable is getting stored in /usr/local/bin.Now im unable to use the s/w by just typing its executable name in the terminal,its giving me an error as "command not found".what i have to do is browse to the directory /usr/local/bin n then run the executable as ./xxxxx.How can i add the directory /usr/local/bin so that it too is checked for executables.
    Thanks in advance,
    Rajiv Nair.

    Anyway, /usr/local is made just for those things you do not want to be touched by your package manager. So, if for any reason you do not want to write a PKGBUILD for something (if e.g., it is just a little script you wrote and you want to install it system-wide; or you have some reasons to make the compilation routine step by step), then /usr/local is then just the right place: /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin for executable with various permissions, /usr/local/lib for the libraries, may be /usr/local/src for the sources, etc. Then you should just modify your /etc/profile (or your .bashrc, .zshrc).
    This is not what is supported by arch, but it is something you can always do, if you like so, in any linux system of the world.

  • Usr/local/bin...or where?

    hey guys,
    I just made a package of sylpheed claws 2.00.  Everything went ok, but the binary was placed in /usr/local/bin.  For reasons I don't quite understand, this is not an arch-like place to be.  So where should I put it, and how should I modify my pkgbuild to put it there?
    btw, here's the fairly plain pkgbuild;
    pkgname=sylpheed-claws
    pkgver=2.0.0
    pkgrel=1
    pkgdesc="The stable extended version of sylpheed"
    url="http://claws.sylpheed.org/"
    licence=""
    depends=(pkgconfig libetpan)
    makedepends=()
    conflicts=()
    replaces=()
    backup=()
    install=
    source=(http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sylpheed-claws/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
    md5sums=('7ddfc626484ae0954a78c5233931e21a')
    build() {
    cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
    ./configure --with-gtk2
    make || return 1
    make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
    also, what forum should I have posted this to?
    thanks!

    Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
    General hints -
    ./configure --help
    will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

  • How do I change permisson to write on /usr/local/bin??

    Hi
    I'm installing a software by source (PKG-CONFIG) as needed by bluefish, however which I was doing " Make install" the terminal told me that it can't write on /usr/local/bin/pkg-config......so how do I change the permission so that I can start installing??
    Thanks
    Chris

    Precede the install command with "sudo" and use your password (provided you are an admin). Then the insatller will have permission to write as if you are the "root" user.
    eg:
    $ sudo install
    will run "install" as if run by root - who does have permission to write to the dir.
    MacBook (BootCamp), various Macs and servers   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

  • How to change /usr/bin/grep To /usr/local/bin/grep

    Hi
    I have installed GNU Grep but when I am giving the command #which grep it is showing me solaris grep i.e /usr/bin/grep.
    My question is how do I change it to /usr/local/bin/
    Thanks in advance
    Sukrut

    You have a few options:
    1) place /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your PATH environment variable
    2) remove /usr/bin/grep altogether
    3) move /usr/bin/grep to something else (ie: /usr/bin/solaris/grep) and symlink /usr/bin/grep to /usr/local/bin/grep just in case any hard coded programs/scripts rely on /usr/bin/grep being present.
    I prefer step #3 since most of the various gnu utilities are virtually 100% drop-in replacements.

  • How do I add /usr/local/bin to path

    Hi.
    I have installed arch linux on a server.
    It seems really very good - manged to install latest snort-inline easily...
    However (and this is really a completely NOOB question)
    - how do I add /usr/local/bin to the default (root) path ?
    I have tried to add
    PATH=/usr/local/bin
    to /etc/enviornment
    But it did not show up when using the - env command (after re-logging in)
    I know that I could sym link to /usr/bin but i would like to know.
    Any help would be good
    Cheers
    Last edited by yossarianuk (2008-10-02 10:31:21)

    There's a place for all three of /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, and ~/bin --- even on Arch.
    If you download package whizbang-1.2.3 from some non-Arch site, its installer will often by default try to install its files into the /usr/local hierarchy. When making a PKGBUILD, you want to tell it instead to install into $pkgdir/usr, so that when you install the resulting pkg file with pacman, it goes into the /usr hierarchy. That's what the wiki page is saying: pacman-managed stuff goes into the /usr hierarchy.
    /usr/local/* is for files you want to install systemwide without making a PKGBUILD. Your own scripts are a great example. Also you might want to install some compiled files that way, if making a PKGBUILD isn't worth it or you don't have the time to write (*and maintain!*) one.
    ~/bin is for scripts (could be compiled files too) that you want to only be available to that specific user.

  • OK to create /usr/local/bin?

    Hi,
    I tried today to install the command line utility for Growl, growlnotify. The installer script failed because it tried to install into /usr/local/bin which isn't there currently.
    Now, is it OK to just go ahead and run "mkdir /usr/local/bin" to create the directory? I am not very experienced with Unix so I usually don't touch the unix directories so that I don't mess up anything...
    Thanks!
    Ingo

    If you are the only or primary user of your computer, and you want to mess around, /usr/local is as good a place as any, since most software installs in it by default. Another option is to do stuff in your home directory.
    If you have a dumb installer or Makefile that tries to install and possibly over-write files in say /usr/bin, you would be tipped off by install permission failure, whereas if you issued "sudo make install" you are at the mercy of whomever wrote the Makefile.
    I actually build stuff in my home directory and install it into root-owned /usr/local, and the first time I issue "make -i install" I do it without write permissions and I can watch where it tries to put stuff. That is excessively paranoid. But its when you stop being paranoid.
    Anyway, it doesn't much matter. For security reasons on a multiuser system, it is best to have multi-user accessed executables in root-owned directories.

  • GTKlxsplit's makefile wiped my /usr/local/bin/

    Alright, right now I'm feeling stupid and raped. but hey! At least I have a funny story to tell
    One trusts, that someone that can make a gtk front-end for a terminal application can also make a simple makefile.
    It doesn't seem to be the case.
    I have some .001 .002... files and since with cat we need to find, then sort, then cat it, I decided to try lxsplit and it's simple gtk gui
    Well, no configure file... that's ok since the application seems to be really simple.
    make is only one line and returns ok. The binary file on the current folder seems to work, so let's make install it! No error, only one line, that's ok for me... let's try running it.
    gtk<tab>... nothing. gtklx<tab>... still nothing.
    Let's see where make install put it:
    # make install
    cp -f gtklxsplit /usr/local/bin
    Ok maybe /usr/local/bin isn't in $PATH... wait a minute, /usr/local/bin?!!!!
    Ok, just great, now I have a bin file on /usr/local instead of a bin folder!
    Ok, make uninstall then edit Makefile: /usr/local/bin to /usr/bin/
    Now make and make install.
    gtklx<tab>... gtklxsplit! nice program runs fine... join... select file... "join" -> Segmentation fault!
    Ok, useless... make uninstall.
    some seconds later... wtf: yao<tab>... nothing!
    ls /usr/bin
    ls: cannot access /usr/bin: No such file or directory
    Ok, just won the lottery!
    I just have to find a way to commemorate! I still have firefox, pidgin, xterm and pcmanfm running until I close them It's gonna be a hell of a party!
    Last edited by VuDu (2008-08-27 23:25:23)

    Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
    General hints -
    ./configure --help
    will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

  • Not able to see make in /usr/local/bin even after installing the package

    Hi,
    I have installed the package make-3.8 for solaris 9 on my machine with sun os 5.9. But still I can not see 'make' in /usr/local/bin .
    Does anyone have an idea why?
    I installed the same as root using the command:
    pkdadd -d <packagename>
    But it gives me quite many warnings like :
    WARNING : /usr/local/bin/make <not present on Read only file system>
    WARNING : /usr/local/bin/doc/make/ABOUT-NLS <not present on Read only file system>
    At the end it says Installation of SMCmake was successful
    Still I can't see make in /usr/local/bin.
    Regards
    Manmeet

    Seems like /usr/local is mounted read-only? Run
    mount | grep local
    or
    touch /usr/local/test
    and see if you can write files in the directory.
    /M.

  • /usr/local/bin vs /usr/bin and Kazehakase vs Firefox

    When you install an application to /usr/bin  will it be more faster than installed on /usr/local/bin?
    I have Firefox installed in /usr/bin and Kazehakase installed to /usr/local/bin. And it seems that Firefox is faster than Kazehakase. Why?
    Last edited by Paingiver (2008-03-15 11:11:48)

    dyscoria wrote:
    Endperform wrote:The notion that an application can be sped up by linking it in your home directory, or even renaming it to one letter is also crazy.  Your install will search for an executable in the path specified in $PATH and then execute the first instance it finds, but this does NOT speed the application itself up.
    No seriously, if you rename all your executables to one letter then your system runs like lightning!
    * am i really that bad at sarcasm? *
    Yes, since there was no indication of sarcasm in your post.  A or would have worked

Maybe you are looking for