Scrolling back in time more than 24 hours

Hi
YouView box in and working for two weeks with all going well. We are now gradually learning the new functionality & differences between this and a Vision Box with no surprises or disappointments so far.
One small thing to clarify is with the EPG and scrolling back the 7 days to watch/download programmes. It only seems to want to go back to 4 AM this morning and prior to that on all channels states "No information". I understood we should be able to go back 7 days?
I've turned it off & on and rebooted the hub (much to the irritation of the Broadband I fear!) but to no avail.
Any suggestions?
Tim
Solved!
Go to Solution.

This isn't the answer you want, but I have had the problem once before, I rebooted the box and it seemed to clear the problem. Can you try restarting just the box once more and see what happens?

Similar Messages

The screen is frozen while installing software updates. Say about 2 minutes and it has been more than hour. How can I cancel or do something about it? Is it ok to unplugg it? Please advise.

The screen is frozen while installing software updates. Say about 2 minutes and it has been more than hour. How can I cancel or do something about it? Is it ok to unplugg it? Please advise.

Really?
Is there no other option? No magic key combo that brings up a secret menu?
My imac just froze during a software update install and I too do not know what to do.

We have two remote location when we makes this remote location pc member of domain (Remote location connected leaselan) it's taking login time more than 40/45 minutes.

We have two remote location when we makes this remote location pc member of domain (Remote location connected leaselan)
it's taking login time more than 40/45 minutes.
Pls suggest.

Hi,
It might be Group Policies causing the login process slow.
Remove any GPOs with Wallpaper or logon scripts on the user\computer account and try again.
Regards,
Satyajit
Please “Vote As Helpful”
if you find my contribution useful or “Mark As Answer” if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Why has Time machine been backing up for more than a week on Ethernet?

I recently had to format my MacBook Pro (Snow Leopard). Fortunately I was using Time Machine on Time Capsule. I was able to restore from my last backup everything as it was before.
However, after all that, backing up for the first time was taking too long (105 GB) on Wifi so I connected my laptop to the time capsule using an ethernet cable. The first 35GB backed up in a few hours... but it has taken a WEEK to go from 35GB to 70GB!!
Why is this taking so long? What can I do to speed up the process? I am worried that if I cancel the backup I'll have to start all over again...

Hi V,
Cancel it. There may be an issue, so it might never finish. Or, it could just be a hiccup, and by starting it over it will complete in a few hours at most.
When you quit it, run Repair Disk on the TM HD, and Verify disk on your internal HD (from Disk Utility).

TM backs up way more than it "Prepares" to back up.

I've been using Time Machine without problem for some weeks now.
Today I plugged the firewire drive into my Powerbook and opened up Time Machine preferences to watch what happened (as is my practice). It did a "Preparing" phase for a normal period of time and then said it was going to back up roughly 7 MB of data. This matched my expectations.
However, when the progress bar and numeric indicator both said it had gotten that far it just kept going!
The progress bar remained at 100% and BOTH the numeric target of how much to backup and the count of how much had in fact been transferred increased together.
By the time it reached 1 GB I decided to check the Console. There were no error messages in the Console. It did however have one oddity. It said that a backup had been requested due to disk insertion (which was correct), and that a "standard" backup had started. And then, shortly after that, there was ANOTHER message that a backup had been requested by the automatic scheduler.
That may be nothing but it was the only odd thing in there.
The backup was still going -- and rather more slowly than I'm used to for large TM backups.
Eventually it completed, having transferred 4.3 GB -- way more than I expected but of course by no means anywhere close to a full system backup.
I checked the Console again and found the normal messages: 4.3 GB transferred, no pre- or post-backup thinning required, nothing deleted.
I did a Disk Utilities Verify Disk on both the main hard drive and the Time Machine drive, as well as a Repair Permissions on the main hard drive. No problems reported.
I rebooted and commanded another backup. This one completed normally having transferred under 1 MB.
So again, the only odd thing I've been able to find was the Console report of the automatic scheduler having requested a backup while a backup was already in progress due to disk insertion.
I poked around in the Time Machine itself and could find no problems with this extra large backup, the one I did after it, or any of the prior history.
So there appears to be no actual damage done, although the size of that backup remains a mystery -- as does why it didn't show up as the target amount after the "Preparing" phase.
And oh, yes, the actual space consumed on my main hard drive has not changed. So I haven't suddenly acquired 4 GB of new stuff somehow. Which means the 4.3 GB backed up must have represented changes of some sort as opposed to new stuff.
I thought that Time Machine might have somehow picked up stuff from another Mac on the LAN, but the Time Machine display does not let you select the shared portion of a networked computer so apparently not.
Anyway, another TM mystery.
--Bob

No I've done multiple, hourly incremental backups since the QuickTime update. The size of the first of those backups after applying the update was reasonable given the size of the update and the files likely altered. The incrementals after that were all modest and thoroughly in accordance with the sorts of activities I had been doing.
(For folks reading this after the fact, the backup in question happened BEFORE Apple came out with the 2007-9 security update released later that same day. Also, I've got one virtual environment file -- a Virtual PC file -- but that's around 10 GB so it couldn't have been party to this 4.3 GB mystery backup. And it wasn't touched/modified since the prior incremental anyway.)
The weird thing is the idea that "Preparing" came up with a figure that matched my expectations (around 7 MB), but then the actual backup blasted right past that and just kept climbing to 4.3 GB.
Also, there wasn't anything that I was doing during that backup that might have invalidated the "Preparing" results. I specifically wanted to sit there and watch it complete the backup after I plugged in the firewire disk. I've been looking for cases where the backup appears to get hung up during the data transfer, only to complete after an unexplained pause of a minute or so. So I plugged in the disk, opened Time Machine preferences to see what happened, and just sat there watching it.
In this case the approx. 7 MB declared by "Preparing" transferred without any significant pauses and then I marveled as it just kept going. I didn't actually do anything until it crossed 1 GB, at which point I went to open the Console to see if it had any explanation.
Another significant factor, I think, is that the speed of the transfer was fairly slow. I've done multiple GB Time Machine backups (as when that Virtual PC environment file changes), so I have a feel for how fast this firewire 800 drive will do that. And this 4.3 GB transfer was quite a bit slower.
If I had to guess, I'd say that Time Machine was doing some re-writing of stuff FROM the Time Machine disk TO the Time Machine disk (so that the firewire speeds affected the data transfer twice). But there was nothing in the Console logs that suggest anything like that was happening. Alternatively Time Machine may have been reading data across the network and transferring it to the Time Machine disk. That too would account for the speed difference. But I can find no files in the Time Machine histories indicating that anything like that might have happened.
--Bob

To add the object link at a time more than 13 line items

Dear All,
Can you help me regarding the below statment.
In object link in cv01n and cv02n t-code have limitation to add the object at a time 13 line items. If you add the more than 13 line items it takes time. If there is any provision to add the more than 13 line items at a time.
Thanks
Asutosh

Hi,
In transaction CV02N unfortunately this is not possible to enlarge the line number. To add a lot of objects to a document info record you may use DMS BAPI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE2. You can use BAPI_DOCUMENT_GETDETAIL2 to read out the current document data and then hand over to BAPI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE2, where you can add new objects in table 'OBJECTLINKS'.
Best regards,
Christoph

Undo file Having huge read average time more than 20ms

Please,
I'm working on oracle 10g, windows server 2003.
From the file I/O stats, I found that the Average read I/O from the undo files is more than 20ms, this contrast with other files where the same I/O metric is less then 0.5ms.
Can someone give me a clue?
thanks a lot

I assume 'undo files' you mentioned means datafiles of undo tablespace: Yes
How did you determined the I/O metric ? What tools used?, the following script
column FILE_NAME format a30
column PHYRDS format 999999,999
column PHYWRTS format 999999,999
column READTIM format 999999,999
column "READ AVG (ms)" format 999.99
column "TOTAL I/O" format 999999,999
select
FILE_NAME,
PHYRDS,
READTIM,
PHYWRTS,
READTIM / (PHYRDS + 1) "READ AVG (ms)",
PHYRDS + PHYWRTS "TOTAL I/O"
from
V$FILESTAT a,
DBA_DATA_FILES b
where
a.FILE# = b.FILE_ID
order by
6 DESC;
Are other files on the same storage as undo datafiles?, all files datafiles,redo files, cotrol files are on the same storage.
How are your disk storage configured?, it may be a RAID X technology, because the level is unknown.
By default our client cannot accept to move the undo file to another storage, that's why all data files are stored on the same drive.
So what can cause the undo read average time to be so high?
Thanks again

Can only synch a small number of songs at a time -- more than 20 or so yields "itunes has stopped working" error message.

When I try to synch more than a small number of songs at a time 20-30 or so), I get the error message "iTunes has stopped working." This happens on my iPod, iPad, and iPhone, so I'm sure it's an iTunes or computer issue. I'm using a PC with Vista.
I have reinstalled iTunes many times. I have also taken care to delete all iTunes related files from my registry. Any suggestions? It is a pain to manually synch my library in batches of 20 songs at a time. If someone has a solution to this, I would be SO GRATEFUL.

i found the problem. ipod doesn't like my new combo usb/firewire hub. plugged directly into USB card on computer, problem went away. yay.

SAINT/SPAM UPDATE takes longer time more than 12hours

Hi everyone,
I am doing SAINT/SPAM UPDATE version 33 on NW70 systems running on windows 2003 x64 servers with oracle 10g database. The update is running for more than 12 hours and has not finished yet.
Normally SAINT/SPAM update wud take 15 to 20mins. But this is very unusual.
Has anyone faced similar problems before ?
Please suggest solutions if any
thanks
Moses

Check the import monitor and the tp system log to check the status of the patch... please post here any errors found.
Loging using DDIC
ensure 000 client you login
ensure your active login session on CI instance (in case multiple instances)
ensure to shutdown/stop all other instances (Dialog Distances) running on other hosts
This information is inacurate and missleading... You don't need to logon with DDIC you can use any user with the right authorizations, also you don't need to shutdown any instances.
Regards
Juan

Application is getting crash when recording long time( more than 1hour 30m)

Implemented a Java app to record audio & video .
For audio recording - Java Sound , video - writing all captured images to one file by capturing images using java.awt.Robot class
Generating video file using JMF from captured images.
Once clicked on stop button, I am merging audio & video files using JMF .
But Here the problem is if I record more than 1hr 30min then I clicked on STOP button, then the app is crashing.
I am not getting any out of memory or some other exceptions.
Please suggest.
Thanks
GRR

          * This is called from the Processor to read a frame worth of video data.
          public void read(Buffer buffer) throws IOException
               logger.debug(" read(): nextImage = " + nextImage + ",numOfFrames : "+RecordingConverter.numOfImages);
               if (nextImage >= numOfImages)
                    start = System.currentTimeMillis();
                    // We are done. Set EndOfMedia.
                    logger.debug("Done reading all images.");
                    buffer.setEOM(true);
                    buffer.setOffset(0);
                    buffer.setLength(0);
                    buffer.setFormat(format);
                    ended = true;
                    return;
               nextImage++;
               int imageSize = EndianFormat.readInt(recFile);
          byte data[] = new byte[imageSize];
          recFile.readFully(data);
               buffer.setData(data);
               buffer.setOffset(0);
               buffer.setLength(data.length);
               buffer.setFormat(format);
               buffer.setFlags(buffer.getFlags() | Buffer.FLAG_KEY_FRAME);
          }

How do I change back to having "bookmark this page" on the top of the list and subordinate "all bookmarks" lower since I use former 100 times more than the later on a daily basis?

I create about 25 -50 new bookmarks daily for my business. So, it would seem user friendly to put that command at the top of the scroll down list. Maybe I am unique and others want to "show all bookmarks" repeatedly. I can't understand why one would need to do that more often than add multiple bookmarks on a daily basis. i look forward to your response,. Respectfully MC

cor-el, as you said, that solution puts the "show all bookmarks" all the way at the bottom. How do you either make "bookmark this page" first without changing the order of the other options or force "show all bookmarks" to be second instead of last, the way the menu was before?

Converting "Apple Lossless" back to "AAC" - More than 1 track at a time...

Hello,
Short version: I have hundreds of tracks that need to "Create AAC Version", and I can't right-click 8,536 songs in my library one at a time to find them all. Is there a method to sweep the entire library and convert all songs to this format if they are not already?
The problem with this is it still creates a duplicate of the song and the other original needs to be deleted.
Note - the file name changing (it appends a "1" on the M4A file), the "tag" displayed in iTunes retains the song name.
Thanks!,
Joseph
Long version: For the benefit of people facing the same problem and combing the forums for help, here's the rest of the story...
I'm not entirely sure when this changed (and I've reset my Import settings back to AAC 128-bit now), but I've managed to import a good number of CDs at this higher quality "Apple Lossless" format. Essentially, that's overkill - I listen to an iPod classic with headphones the majority of the time (98%) and I won't hear the difference.
CHECK: Edit | Preferences | "General" tab | "Import Settings" button
Essentially my hard-drive space has been disappearing at a rapid rate. I downloaded a tool (WinDarStat) and found my iTunes folder is 50% of my 200GB used. (Yes, I'm on an older laptop -- HD=220GB -- and am getting the 'out of space' warnings.) I found some folders for recent CDs were over 1GB alone and started digging.
I happend to have REM's studio "Man on the Moon" on here twice. The IN TIME version is AAC 128-bit and only 4.9MB in size, whereas the PART LIES version is Apple Lossless 1068-bit and 8x's larger at 39.9MB.
If you right-click a track, it provides option to "Create [other] version.", depending on going to/from ACC to Lossless or vice-versa.
Once I did this for "Man on the Moon", I got 75% of the song's space back ... from approximately 40MB to 11MB.
It does create a second copy of the song, so the original has to be deleted - be certain to "Move the song to the Recycle Bin" when warned.
A better option - all be it more time consuming - is to re-import the CDs.

For backup see this user tip.
The Create <Format> version tool uses whatever the current import settings are.
You can create a playlist of things that need converting as Ed says above.
To ease the conversion process, and keep your current ratings, playcounts, and playlist membership, plus recyle the old files automatically see my script ConvertFormat. Test on say a single album first to make sure it works as you expect/need.
tt2

Urgent run the job --SBIE0001 takes long time more than two hours

hi expert,
we run the job which cocntian the program SBIE0001 it takes so along time,
we use the job to eatra the date from our system to another satellite system, by checking the
job this is one step takes the mainly time as below.
88 LUWs confirmed and 88 LUWs to be deleted with function module RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA
any update will be appreciated. thanks in advance.

If you have transaction ME30 active in yous system, run the program into in.
It will give more information about how the time is lost.

Can't go back or forward more than one page at a time, what happened to the little arrow that allowed you to go back several pages at once.

some websites disable the back button. older versions of firefox i could hit the little arrow on the right of the forward button and it would display several back pages so i could choose which one to go back or forward to. now i go back as far as a disabled page and can't go any further. this is really annoying to lose a feature that i used all the time

There are three options to access the history: (1) Click and hold the back button. (2) Right click the back button (3) If you really want the dropmarker back, install an addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/backforward-dropmarker/.
Hope that helps:)

Time Machine: each backup backs up gigs more than I've changed

How does it happen that TM's display pref pane shows that it's backed up, say, 1.2GB of 4.6GB when I haven't changed or added anything except a bunch of emails? I realize that during any given work session many application prefs and support files are going to get changed behind the scense, but several gigs worth?
Thanks!

Triple-click anywhere in the line below to select it:
tmutil compare
Copy the selected text to the Clipboard (command-C).
Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the icon grid.
Paste into the Terminal window (command-V).
The command will take at least a few minutes to run. Eventually some lines of output will appear below what you entered.
Each line that begins with a plus sign (“+”) represents a file that has been added to the source volume since the last snapshot was taken. These files have not been backed up yet.
Each line that begins with an exclamation point (“!”) represents a file that has changed on the source volume. These files have been backed up, but not in their present state.
Each line that begins with a minus sign (“-“) represents a file that has been removed from the source volume.
Files that you’ve excluded from backup, or that are excluded automatically, are ignored.
At the end of the output, you’ll get some lines like the following:
Added:
Removed:
Changed:
These lines show the total amount of data added, removed, or changed on the source(s) since the last snapshot.

Scrolling back in time more than 24 hours

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for