SCVMM live migrations very slow

I'm running Hyper V with SCVMM 2012 in my test environment. 2 hosts connected to a MD1200 and set up in a cluster. Everything works perfectly, except that live migrations take a super long time. By this I mean that when I start the Migration Wizard it takes up to 5 minutes to rate the hosts, and then when it finally completes and I start the migration, it can take up to another 5 minutes to complete the move.In my production clusters this doesn't work this way, there the Migration Wizard takes seconds to rate the hosts and usually less than a minute to move the VM.The only major difference between my test environment and my production environment is that test is using direct SAS connections to the SAN, where in prod everything runs through switches. In prod one cluster is all 1gig and one cluster is 10gig and both are about the same...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hey guys,
I have searched online and in MS forums, and cannot resolve my issue.
I have checked through similar articles, without any resolution.
Migrating
Mailbox From Exchange 2007 to  Exchange 2010: Very Slow                        
Exchange 2013 Mailbox Migration Rate/Speed ?                        
Public Folders after migration
to Exchange 2013 are extremly slow                        
Exchange 2010 mailbox move to Exchange 2013                        
Single Mailbox Very Slow after 2003
to 2010 Migration
I have also come across the most common solution which is written here
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2807668, however this is not my problem.
My problem is that mailbox migrations are SLOW, I'm talking about < 15MB per minute.  I do NOT have any contentIndex errors on any of my databases, they are all healthy and stay healthy throughout the migrations.  Both Exchange 2010 and 2013
are DAGs.
When I 'view details' from the ECP migrations page, I see things like 'Stalled duration
00:53:21 ', however like I said there is no errors, and nothing mentioned in the user report.
Get-ClientAccessServer | Test-MRSHealth this checks out fine, no problems.
I have disabled offloading on all of the NICs.
Is there anything else I can do or monitor to find out why its so slow?
Could it be because of DAG even though there are no errors and the state is healthy.  Would an idea be to take down the dag during migration then add that after all is done?
Andrew Huddleston | Hillsong Church | Sydney

Similar Messages

  • SCVMM Live migration issue

    Hi all,
    I have a SCVMM 2012 R2 on prod with a Hyper-V Host cluster having 4 nodes.
    I am trying to live migrate hosts from one server to another all the virtual machine are having static IP, the migration is successful but after the migration i am getting this error :-
    Error (23753)
    The virtual machine or tier load balancer configuration requires an IP pool and there are no appropriate IP pools accessible from the host.
    Recommended Action
    Select a host with access to an appropriate IP pool and try the operation again.
    I searched & found this KB related to the issue - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2915463
    but is there any other way to stop this error from reoccurring without creating an IP pool as i am having a DHCP in my network.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Pranay.

    Hi Pranay,
    SCVMM has been engineered to require at least one IP pool to be configured as part of the SDN. The only way I have been able to stop this error for customers that have static assigned IP addresses on all their servers was to create a single IP
    Pool against one of the logical networks and fill it with an IP range that is not in use i.e. 10.10.10.0/24.
    Additionally depending on the number of servers you have, you could assign them all to a single IP pool with the correct IP range then statically assign the correct address to them from within the VM config.
    Its not a great solution, but I have used the first option which will remove the error when LM VMs.
    Kind Regards Michael

  • HT1349 very slow external HDD and usb drive connected to Apple Extreme Router

    Hello
    So I got a western digital USB drive (500gig) and western digital Live 2TB.
    I bought a new Apple Extreme router and connected them both.
    USB drive and external hdd (WD Live 2TB) very slow when connected to Apple Extreme Router, using Lion 10.7 and updated both firmware for router, western digital and Airport Utility.
    Slow means, it takes half an hour to copy 200 Mb of file to the WD Live 2TB, and its connected to my router with a gigabit ethernet cable!
    Is someone else having the same problem, I thought even over usb I should get around 2-5mb range.
    I am using Macbook Pro and 802.11n with Lion 10.7.2
    Please Help

    The USB WD 500 gig is connected to the Airport Extreme using a non-powered USB 2.0 hub, only two things a HP printer and the 500 gig is connected through it. I already formatted it to MAC OS Extended Journalled. ANd I think the speed didnt change.
    For the WD 2TB Live I didnt format it to anything, started using it out of the box. I just updated its firmware. I was having the same speed even when I directly connected it to my Mac Book Pro using ethernet gigabit cable.
    This WD 2TB Live doesnt have any USB 2.0 or USB 3.0 connectors, just the ethernet cable. I wasnt planning to carry it around. Just wanted to use it as a good ol NAS. So then I saw the fix somewhere and connected to this drive via AFP,  afp://MyBookLive._afpovertcp._tcp.local/Public and it become suddenly very fast. Just like how it should be, I easily copied 20 gigs in around 20-25 minutes. (This was dirctly connected to my computer)
    So then I thought my problem is solved and disconnected my WD Live and connected it back to the Apple Router again, and the speed became very slow again. Now both the USB 500 gig and this 2TB Live are slow.
    Time machine is also very slow.
    Thing is I also have a linux and windows machine(in repair, but should be up soon), Since apple is the newest computer I have, I want to make it work on this first. I dont want to use the MACosx journaled on the 2TB right now. Besides formatting the USB 500 gig to this format didnt help with my speed. So the problem can be elsewhere.
    - I will try to get a powered USB hub as woodmeister50 suggested.
    - I dont know how to connect via iCloud as cigame suggested
    Please let me know if you guys have any suggestions. I have tested and returned enough routers in past few weeks. I really want it to work on this combination LionOSX + Airport Extreme + WD Live.
    Thanks

  • Win 2012 shared-nothing live migration slow performance

    Win 2012 shared-nothing live migration slow performance
    Hello,
    i have two standalone hyper-v servers - A) 2012 and  B) 2012 r2.
    I tried live migration on non-shared storage between them. The functionality is alright but performance is low. The copying take a long time with max 200 Mbps.
    I am not able to find the bottleneck. Network a disk performance seems to be good. It is 1Gbps network and when I tried simple copy paste the vhd file from A to B through cifs protocol, the speed was about almost full 1Gbps - it was nice and fast.
    Is it feature? I am not able reach full network performance with shared-nothing live migration.
    Thank you for reply
    sincerely
    Peter Weiss

    Hi,
    I don’t found the similar issue with Hyper-V, Does both of your hosts have the chipsets in the same family? Could you try to switch the three Live Migration Performance
    Option method then monitor again? Or It seems there may have some disk or file system performance issue, please try to update your RAID card firmware to the least version.
    More information:
    Shared Nothing Live Migration: Goodbye Shared Storage?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2013/01/03/shared-nothing-live-migration-goodbye-shared-storage.aspx
    How to: Copy very large files across a slow or unreliable network
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/granth/archive/2010/05/10/how-to-copy-very-large-files-across-a-slow-or-unreliable-network.aspx
    The similar thread:
    How to determine when to use the xcopy with the /j parameter?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/5ebfc25a-41c8-4d82-a2a6-d0f15d298e90/how-to-determine-when-to-use-the-xcopy-with-the-j-parameter?forum=winserverfiles
    Hope this helps

  • Live Cam Voice on HP DV8305 -- Video image very slow

    I installed Live! Cam Voice on my HP DV8305 succussfully, it works, but the video image is very slow. it needs about 30sec to capture a frame, sometime just stucked. I changed the Display Adaptive Driver, used differrent USB IF, checked my CPU and Memery usage, my HD space, use differrent IM -- skype, MSN, .... Any one can help?

    As further information, the issue seems to be with the exposure setting. When I turn auto exposure off, then set exposure down as low as it will go, the picture darkens, but the frame rate goes up. I don't have this problem with my Logitech QuickCam Orbit -- I'm not sure if the problem is with the firmware, or if the CMOS sensor in the Live! Cam Voice is just smaller.

  • Time machine backup is very slow after migration to Mountain Lion

    After I migrated to mountain lion, Time machine backup is very slow. Time machine preference says there is no previous back up although I had Time machine on before migration. It did not help verymuch to connect an ethernet cable between my timecapsule and my Macbook Pro
    Here are the screenshots I see:
    Should I erase the previous backup made on Lion before backing up on Mountain lion? in this case how do I transfer the Lion backup file on another disk just in case something goes wrong before I have a good backup under Mountain Lion? just like any other file?

    After further reading on the forum, the problem was solved: I used the possibility to back up on a second disk (in the preferences Time Machine choose a disk and save on both disks) to make a back up on another usb disk, and then erased the old .sparsebundle file on my Time Capsule. I have then re defined time capsule as the back up disk and then the backup was muuuuuch faster (one night instead of less than 1 giga after 3 days.....)

  • Live Text Template - Very slow to update

    Started using Live Text Templates which in theory seem really great but they are SOOOOO slow to update.
    So I create a simple 5 sec title with two text elements which simply fade in at the start and fade out at the end. The back ground is plain colored shape.
    I put this in to premiere, open it in the source panel and update my two text elements
    I put this title into an empty timeline - if I move the play head over the clips in the timeline it can take up to 60 seconds before the clip shows the correct text
    I then change the text in the master clip (title).
    Going back to the time line it takes about 1-2 minutes before I can view the changes in the timeline - either by just putting the playhead over the clip or actually playing the timeline. It will either show a black frame or the previous text.
    If the sequence contains other content then after changing text in the master clip the whole timeline will just show a black frame in the program panel for about 30-60 seconds then I can view this other content but have to wait a further 30-60 seconds before I see the updated title text.
    Its very slow and far from live. Anyone know if there is something I can change somewhere to speed this up? What is happening behind the scenes to allow Premiere to effectively render out this titles? If I actually render the title in the timeline it only take a few seconds so no reason it should take so long for Premiere to do it in the background.

    Good question that I ask myself also, but not just updating Titles. Same time lag for updating a Photoshop image that sits inside Premiere, or updating an After Effects composition inside Premiere.
    Sometimes I think I can 'trick it' into speeding up by 'saving' the Premiere project, but then most times I think I am tricking myself.

  • Windows Migration Assistant very slow via ethernet cable but after 36 hours .......

    I am using Windows Migration Assistant to migrate from my 3 year old HP laptop running Windows 8 to a brand new iMac using an ethernet cable..
    The pairing went well but, after 36 hours the laptop tells me there are 13 hors to go and iMac says 8 hours +. What am I doing wrong?

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    Wi-Fi and Ethernet are very slow ways and I don't recommend to use them unless you have to transfer small sizes. If they are big, don't use it.
    What you can do is to make a Time Machine backup on your old hard drive, so get an external drive to do it. See > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1427
    After making the backup, connect the external drive to your new iMac and use Migration Assistant to restore your files. If you haven't set up your iMac yet, Setup Assistant will ask you to restore the backup.
    You have to restart both iMacs before doing this, so migration will be stopped

  • Live Migration between two WS2012 R2 Clusters with SCVMM 2012 R2 creates multiple objects on Cluster

    Hi,
    I'm seeing an issue when migrating VM's between two 2012 R2 Hyper-V Clusters, using VMM 2012 R2, that have their Storage provided by a 4 Node Scale Out File Server Cluster that the two clusters share.
    A migration between the two clusters is successful and the VM is operation but I'm left with two roles added to the cluster the VM has moved to instead of the expected one.
    For example: Say I have a VM that was created on cluster A with SCVMM, resulting in a name of : "SCVMM Test-01 Resources"
    I then do a live migration to Cluster B which has access to the same storage and then I end up with two new roles instead of one.
    "SCVMM abw-app-fl-01 Resources" and "abw-app-fl-01"
    The "SCVMM abw-app-fl-01 Resources" is left in an unknown state and "abw-app-fl-01" is operational.
    I can safely delete "SCVMM abw-app-fl-01 Resources" and everything still works but it looks like something is failing during the process.
    Has anyone else seen this?
    I'll probably have one of my guys open a support ticket in the new year but was wondering if anyone else is seeing this.
    Kind regards,
    Jas :)

    In my case the VMs where created in VMM in my one and only Hyper-V cluster (that's been created and is managed by VMM).
    All Higly Available VM:s have a FCM role named "SCVMM vmname" where vmname is the name if the VM in VMM. On top of that a lot
    of VM:s, but not all,  have a second role name named vmname. Lots of name in that sentence.
    All VMs that have duplicates are using the role named vmname.
    I thought it had to do with whether a VM had been migrated so I took one that never had been migrated and did. It did not get a duplicate.
    Is there any progress on this?

  • Migration Assistant very slow

    Anyone know if there is a way of speeding this up or is this just the norm.  Been doing this all week.  An older iMac with about 450gb to transfer onto a new macbook pro usb-usb ... took 28 hours.  Now doing an old iMac to a new iMac 1.6tb this time via ethernet.  Started this morning and its predicting 109hours.......Thoughts to speed this up very much sppreciated.

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    Wi-Fi and Ethernet are very slow ways and I don't recommend to use them unless you have to transfer small sizes. If they are big, don't use it.
    What you can do is to make a Time Machine backup on your old hard drive, so get an external drive to do it. See > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1427
    After making the backup, connect the external drive to your new iMac and use Migration Assistant to restore your files. If you haven't set up your iMac yet, Setup Assistant will ask you to restore the backup.
    You have to restart both iMacs before doing this, so migration will be stopped

  • Mailbox migration is very slow

    Hi,
    Migration of mailbox from Exchange on premises to Exchange online is very slow, 1 GB mailbox took around 5 hours.
    Appreciate your quick response regarding same.
    Regards,
    Hakim. B
    Hakim.B Sr.System Administrator

    It depends on many factors, there's a long guide here:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/dn592150(v=exchg.150).aspx
    If you have 30 minutes to spend, I also recommend watching the module 3 video from the Office 365 Performance Management course on MVA:
    http://www.microsoftvirtualacademy.com/training-courses/office-365-performance-management

  • Hyper-v 2012 r2 slow throughputs on network / live migrations

    Hi, maybe someone can point me in the right direction, I have 10 servers 5 Dell r210s and 5 Dell R320's, I have basically converted these servers to standalone hyper-v 2012 servers, so there is no clustering on any at the moment.
    Each server is configured with 2 1Gb nics teamed via a virtual switch, now when I copt files between server 1 and 2 for example I see 100MBs throughput, but if I copy a file to server 3 at the same time the file copy load splits the 100MBs throughput between
    the 2 copy processes. I was under the impression if I copied 2 files to 2 totally different servers the load would basically be split across the 2 nics effectively giving me 2Gbs throughput but this does not seem to be the case. I have played around with tcpip
    large send offloads, jumbo packets, disabled vmq on the cards, they are broadcoms. :-(  but it doesn't really seem to make a difference with all of these settings.
    The other issue is If I live migrate a 12Gb vm machine running only 2gb ram, effectively just an o/s it takes between 15 to 20 minutes to migrate, I have played around with the advanced settings, smb, compression, tcpip not real game changers, BUT if I shut
    town the vm and migrate it, it takes, just under 3 and a half minutes to move across.
    I am really stumped here, I am busy in a test phase of hyper-v but cant find any definitive documents relating to this stuff.

    Hi Mark,
    The servers (hyper-v 2012 r2) are all basically configured with ssvmm2012R2 where they all have teamed 1Gb pNics, into a virtual switch, then there are vNics for the Vmcloud, live migration etc.  The physical network is 2 Netgear Gs724T switches which
    are interlinked and each servers 1st nic is plugged into the switch1 and the second nic is plugged into the switch2.See Below Image)  The hyper-v port is set to independent Hyper-v load balancing. 
    The R320 servers are running raid 5 sas drives, the R210s have 1Tb drives mirrored.  The servers all are using DAS storage, we have not moved to looking at using iscsi and san is out the question at the moment.
    I am currently testing between 2x 320s and 2x R210s, I am not copying data to the vm's yets, I am basically testing the transfer between the actual hosts at the moment by copying a 4Gb file manually, After testing the live migrations I decided to test to
    see the transfer rates between the servers first, I have been playing around with the offload settings and rss, what I don't understand is yesterday, the copy between the servers was running up to 228Mbs ie (using both nics) when copying
    the file between the servers, and then a few hours later it only was copying at 50/60Mbs, but its now back at 113Mbs seemingly to be only using one nic.
    I was under the impression if you copy a file between 2 servers the nicks could use the 2gb bandwidth, but after reading many posts they say only one nic, so how did the copies get up to 2Gb yesterday. Then again if you copy files between 3 servers, then
    each copy would use one nic, basically giving you 2Gbs, but this is again not being seen.
    Regards Keith

  • Slow migration rates for shared-nothing live migration over teaming NICs

    I'm trying to increase the migration/data transfer rates for shared-nothing live migrations (i.e., especially the storage migration part of the live migration) between two Hyper-V hosts. Both of these hosts have a dedicated teaming interface (switch-independent,
    dynamic) with two 1GBit/s NICs which is used for only for management and transfers. Both of the NICs for both hosts have RSS enabled (and configured), and the teaming interface also shows RSS enabled, as does the corresponding output from Get-SmbMultichannelConnection).
    I'm currently unable to see data transfers of the physical volume of more than around 600-700 MBit/s, even though the team is able to saturate both interfaces with data rates going close to the 2GBit/s boundary when transferring simple files over SMB. The
    storage migration seems to use multichannel SMB, as I am able to see several connections all transferring data on the remote end.
    As I'm not seeing any form of resource saturation (neither the NIC/team is full, nor is a CPU, nor is the storage adapter on either end), I'm slightly stumped that live migration seems to have a built-in limit to 700 MBit/s, even over a (pretty much) dedicated
    interface which can handle more traffic when transferring simple files. Is this a known limitation wrt. teaming and shared-nothing live migrations?
    Thanks for any insights and for any hints where to look further!

    Compression is not configured on the live migrations (but rather it's set to SMB), but as far as I understand, for the storage migration part of the shared-nothing live migration this is not relevant anyway.
    Yes, all NICs and drivers are at their latest version, and RSS is configured (as also stated by the corresponding output from Get-SmbMultichannelConnection, which recognizes RSS on both ends of the connection), and for all NICs bound to the team, Jumbo Frames
    (9k) have been enabled and the team is also identified with 9k support (as shown by Get-NetIPInterface).
    As the interface is dedicated to migrations and management only (i.e., the corresponding Team is not bound to a Hyper-V Switch, but rather is just a "normal" Team with IP configuration), Hyper-V port does not make a difference here, as there are
    no VMs to bind to interfaces on the outbound NIC but just traffic from the Hyper-V base system.
    Finally, there are no bandwidth weights and/or QoS rules for the migration traffic bound to the corresponding interface(s).
    As I'm able to transfer close to 2GBit/s SMB traffic over the interface (using just a plain file copy), I'm wondering why the SMB(?) transfer of the disk volume during shared-nothing live migration is seemingly limited to somewhere around 700 MBit/s on the
    team; looking at the TCP-connections on the remote host, it does seem to use multichannel SMB to copy the disk, but I might be mistaken on that.
    Are there any further hints or is there any further information I might offer to diagnose this? I'm currently pretty much stumped on where to go on looking.

  • Live Migration Slow - Maxes Out

    Hi everyone...
    I have a private 10GB network that all of my Hyper-V hosts are connected to.  I have told VMM to use this network for live migrations.
    Using performance monitor, I see that the migration is using this private network.  Unfortunately, it will only transfer at 100MB per second.
    There must be a parameter somewhere to say "Use all the bandwidth you need...."
    It is worth mentioning that I also backup the virtual machines using this same network to our backup server, and the transfer rates goes to 10GB per second.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    Is this network dedicated for Live Migration?
    Is this a converged setup where you have a physical team and a VM switch created upon that team?
    In case that is true, then VMQ is enabled and RSS is disabled, which don't let you leverage all the bandwidth for live migration.
    -kn
    Kristian (Virtualization and some coffee: http://kristiannese.blogspot.com )

  • Live Migration : virtual Fibre Channel vSAN

    I can do live migration, from one node to another. No error. Problem / Question that I have is, is live migration really lie migration.
    When I do live migration from cluster or SCVMM  it save and start  virtual machine. Which fro me is not live migration.
    I have describe in more details : http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a52ac102-4ea3-491c-a8c5-4cf4dd14768d/synthetic-fibre-channel-hba-live-migration-savestopstart?forum=winserverhyperv
    BlatniS

    I can do live migration, from one node to another. No error. Problem / Question that I have is, is live migration really lie migration.
    When I do live migration from cluster or SCVMM  it save and start  virtual machine. Which fro me is not live migration.
    I have describe in more details : http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a52ac102-4ea3-491c-a8c5-4cf4dd14768d/synthetic-fibre-channel-hba-live-migration-savestopstart?forum=winserverhyperv
    Virtual Fibre Channel had sense in pre-R2 times when there was no shared VHDX and you had to somehow provide fault tolerant shared storage to guest VM cluster (spawning iSCSI target on top of FC was slow and ugly). Now there\s no point in putting one into
    production so if you have issues just use shared VHDX. See:
    Deploy a Guest Cluster Using a Shared Virtual Hard Disk
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn265980.aspx
    Shared VHDX
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/storageserver/archive/2013/11/25/shared-vhdx-files-my-favorite-new-feature-in-windows-server-2012-r2.aspx
    Shared VHDX is much more flexible and has better performance. 
    Good luck!
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ipod not showing stored music

    Hi, I have a 30gb, 5th gen iPod and Windows XP. Everything has been going pretty much rosy up until now, I have about 20gb's worth of music and about 4gb of video stored and after ejecting from my iPod port yesterday I found that all my music wasn't

  • Change default page size in iWeb?

    Is it possible? How do you do it? At the moemnt I am having to adjust each and every page manually and that takes ages. Will http://web.mac.com/digitographer/iWeb/DementiaScotland/Home.html

  • Output type is not coming to ml81n messages

    Dear Experts, I have maintained the output conditions   NEU in MN13 for purchasing output determination: Document type. But in ML81N it is not coming automatically. What else I should do to come output type NEU automatically to ML81N messages. Thanks

  • Lidwake Set to 0 Has No Effect - Why?

    I prefer to set the lidwake setting (via terminal pmset command) to zero so that my Apple portables don't wake up when the lid is raised. In the past, that was just an extra measure of security to keep Powerbooks and MacBooks from accidentally waking

  • Settings is messed up

    My iPad does not turn off when I close it. This would be tolerable, except for a few factors. Mainly that When I press the power button it doesn't turn off either. When I hold the power button down it WILL power down, but it won't go into sleep mode.