SD-BOM issue

Hi Forum,
We have one requirement in BOM,
When we are creating sales BOM (sales order) as per BOM master data it will expolde in sales order level as header item and sub-items(components),but when it explode the header level item number(for ex:10) will be stored in each sub item level in the field "HL item(VBAP-UEPOS)" and this can be removed manually also that means this field is enabled.
But my requirement is "HL item(VBAP-UEPOS)" should be BLANK(null) and header level item number should not be populated into this filed.
Please give me some light how can we fulfill above requirement without using any enhancement i.e standard (OR) if it can be handled through enhancements(user exit,routines etc..) which is the right enhancement can we use?
Regards,
Chandra

Hi Ravi,
My requirement is we need to create subsequent document(debit memo request) with reference to standard order,when we are doing above scenario only some of the sub-items will be billed as per customer need.That is why we do not need header dependent sub-items,what we need here is we want option to choose sub-items..
Hope you understood requriement.Also i appeal you please stick with BOM scenario only and do not club with freegoods.
Regrads,
Chandra

Similar Messages

Typical BOM issues

Hi,
What are the typical BOM issues a client could face ? I know this is a very generic question but what I am looking for is what is the best way to structure BOMs so that the stocking level is optimized. Can we use phantoms and how do we decide at what level a phantom is to be established ? I know we use phantoms for nonstock items and to reduce the number of production orders being created to manufacture a high level assembly.
Also would a phantom always be marked as "ND" MRP type? What would be the std cost of a phantom? Would it be the cost rollup of its components and the labor needed to assemble the phantom when one needs to manufacture the higher level assembly ?
Thanks

Dear ,
Let me share my experince in terms of BOM which is crticial PP Master data durung our implemention :
What are the typical BOM issues a client could face
1.Need to understnd the product line Standard and Non Standard .Decison on Structed BOM as per the product design and then establish the same in MTS process .For MTO process , you should have BOM establishement from inquiery and quetion level to freeze the BOM .
The engineering depart ment is the crtitical part of BOM establishement .They shpuld have proper approved design and also alternative crtocial items for structured BOM.
2.Usageablity and Costing relevencey in the BOM .You can keep Universal BOM for multi purpose .
3.Engineering Change Number under ECM to investigate the validity .
4.Selection of BOM based on priority and also Selection Alternative BOM method as per SAP Standrad procedure .
Can we use phantoms and how do we decide at what level a phantom is to be established ? Yes.You can use the Phatom assmbly as long you do not want to keep the stock physically but want to plan the dependent through Main FG where Phantom BOM will be a item .Phantom BOM genereally comes under main FG so that during MRP , it will explode the dependent alsong with Main and the cost will be subsequenlt rolled uo at header level .
Also would a phantom always be marked as "ND" MRP type? No .If you keep ND , then it will not be teared through MRP and dependent will not be planned .It's usage should be production, as BOM item is a phantom assembly, the dependent requirements of the higher-level assembly are directly passed on to the components of the phantom assembly .In material master of MRP 2 view spl. procurement key - 50. Assign in BOM item - make tick mark in phantom assmbly. If you create in material master wherever the material, system consider as a phantom.If you mark in BOM, only that particular BOM, system consider as a phantom.
What would be the std cost of a phantom?
Phantom material does not need to have a standard cost becuase the costing program will ignore that particular material when calculating for the upperl level item. Instead, the cost of the components that make up the phantom assembly are taken into consideration. Any labor that is stored in the routing for the phantom assembly is also ignored if one exists.
Please farther refer the belwo thread to have complete picture
Phanthom Material
Hope this clarifies
Regards
JH

CS61 Order BOM issue

Dear Gurus,
I have order BOMs created through CS61 against sales order line items. When I do costing at sales order level it does not explode the Order BOM and hence I am not getting the correct costing. The Order BOM has BOM Usage as 1 (production). I have ticked the Order BOM indicator in configuration OMIW. Also, the Order BOM items are costing relevant.
Is there any other configuration which needs to be done in order to get costing through Order BOMs?
Thanks
Geravine

Hi,
Go to OPPQ ( Plant Parameters for MRP) -
> Select your Plant & choose maintain -
> go to next screen and choose BOM Explosion
Inside BOM explosion, you will find check box : SOrd/ WBS BOM active.
Tick this check box and save the settings.
Then try exploding order BOM.
Your issue will be resolved.
Regards,
Tejas
Edited by: Tejas Pujara on Aug 26, 2009 12:07 PM

BOM issue in production ../

Hi experts
I have create BOM with 7 items for XYZ finished material.
Here , to produce the XYZ finished material, i have to keep stok of BOM materials OF 7 ITEMS.
In 7 item of BOM, only 3 items i have stock, balance 4 items i dot have stock in haNd.
In this case i have do the procduction confirmation and i have deliver the material by today.
Later after 2 days ,when i procure stock and i 'll issue the balance 4 items to consumption for particular sales order.
Is it possible in SAP.
If yes pls suggest the ways to do .
Regards
sap-mm

SAP mm,
Yes this is very much possible.
Production order confirmation, goods issue to order & goods receipt on order are independent activiteis.
System won't restrict you to do all these individually untill & unless you have made settings.
In this case I assume you issue 3 materials to order.
You confirm the order.
You do GR of FG on the order.
And later when the other materials are available you do GI to order.
You can perform in this sequence.
Go ahead & test in sand box or development server to check the results.
One thing I want to add is, in t code OPJK, for combination of plant, order type & business function 2, keep 'Release material' as 2- Release permitted despite missing parts.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS
Edited by: SAP PP Consultant on Jun 16, 2009 8:49 AM

Related to BOM issue

Hi every one,
     I am having a problem with the BOM items "when we r raising a sales order we raised with the 5 items with the header and also we are having 5 subitems in the item but in header only one item is conformed and in item 5 items r conformed but when we raised a delivery with reference to the sales order it is delivering one as both header and also in subitem when we r raising again delivery document its taking all the sub items seperately in the delivery"
Can u plz suggest.
Edited by: matturushiva on Jul 14, 2011 12:01 PM
Edited by: matturushiva on Jul 14, 2011 12:02 PM

Hi,
     i am having a problem with the bom item .
Ex:bom main item:10,20,30,40,50,
   Bom suib item :60,70, 80, 90,100.
in this issue when i am raising a sales order conformed order quantity in Bom main item is only one
but in sub items all 5 items are conformed.
now the problem is when i am raising a delivering with reference to delivery its taking 1(10) main item and 1(60) sub item. up to now its ok.
But when i r raising a delivery with reference to the same sales order it is delivering remaining subitems(70,80,90,100).
with out having a 20,30,40,50 main bom items.
how it is happening can u plz suggest
regards,
shiva
Edited by: matturushiva on Jul 15, 2011 3:02 PM

Subcontracting -BOM issue

Hi
When i was creating sucontract .P.O..for finishedmaterial.
this finished material having 3 alternatives BOM s
in .P.O ..syatem automacially taken altnative 1 BOM,
but some times .i was using altnative 2.. but does not ask the which bom u want..but i entered components manually which i want
for this issue any solution is there..pls guide me..or can we use any userexits..
i found one user exit...but how much for it is useful.
userexit:"CNEX0011- BOM explosion in network on component overview"

Hi:
There is no such standard SAP functionality which could suggest you option to select the alternative BOM while explosion in PO, however we could check the user exit or some implicit enhancements but that depnds whether it is aacceptable to client to implement exits or any enhancement. I am not sure the exit you have found would work up to the expectation please get it check from the ABAPer.....however the other solution to do this which we suggested to one of our client (was not agree to Enhancement) :
1. Create a Production Versions for the different alternative BOMs.
2.Assign the relavant production Version in Subcontracting Info Record.
Now, based on the production version assigned in Info Record system suggests the BOM while BOM explosion in Subcon Purchase Order.
Please let me know if it suits you and request you to award the points if it suits you.
Cheers

WIP and BOM Issue

Hi All,
Issued PO to vendor on a few items including 2 items Item A and Item B
2) During BOM creation, did not include 2 items Item A and Item B
3) Have completed WIP and issued billing invoice to customer Last mont
4) As at now, these 2 items are still in inventory.
How to remove the two items from the Inventory.Is they a way to cost the two items against the customer invoice.
Regards,
Arun.

Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
They dont want to invoice the customer anymore as they already recognised the revenue.Can we do a Misc. Issue against of COGS account.
So they only want to cost these two items against them as the item has been physically shipped out.Only they want to adjust it in the system side.
Kindly let me know in case of clarifications.
Regards,
Arun.

While Create PO alternate BOM Issue

HI All,
While Create PO Iam not able to find alternate BOM which have mainained 1 2 3 BOMs.
System is showing only 1 Deafule BOM Could please let me know how fix this issue.
Alt BOM is Universal -usage and alternate 1 2 and 3.
BR,
Nagaraj K

Hi Nagraj,
If several alternative BOMs exist, there is no possibility
of selecting the desired BOM interactively. Instead,
selection can be controlled via the following mechanisms:
- SELECTION BY QUANTITY:
A lot size interval for which the BOM is valid can be
entered in the BOM header.
A prerequisite is that the Selection method indicator is
not set in the material master record (MRP 4 view).
- SELECTION BY DATE:
Can be set in the IMG under Production -> Basic Data ->
Bill of Material -> Alternative Determination -> Define
Alternative Determination for Multiple BOMs (transaction
OS32). A prerequisite is that the Selection method
indicator the is set to 1 in the material master record
(MRP 4 view).
- SELECTION BY PRODUCTION VERSION:
Can be used if the same material has different BOMs with
different suppliers.
You create different production versions in the material
master record of the assembly (pushbutton in MRP 4 view)
and assign an alternative BOM to the versions on the
detail screen. You then enter the valid production
version in the info record in each case.
If NO selection mechanism has been defined and several
alternatives exist, the FIRST one found is pulled.

Recursive BOM - issue

Hi,
This is actually a bit Techno-functional type issue we have here.
There is a material having a recursive BOM. That means when it explodes it explodes into the same material.
So in Sales Order
item 10 - Material X
generates item 20 - material X.
After the GR is done as expected on Material X but in Item 20.
Till this part everything is fine.
Now we create the billing document. It should actually pick up Item 10 but instead it picks up item 20. Can you tell me any configuration / routines which can be done to avoid this issue.
We have the billing documnet which is referencing the Order and not the delivery.
Any suggestions would be very useful.
Thanks and Regards,
Arnab.
Edited by: Arnab Panigrahi on Jul 2, 2008 3:10 PM

Dear All,
I am having similar issue, Can any one help me in this regard.
As per my client requirement:
For Ex:
Scenario 1:
To produce 100 kg of A, 102 kg of A is used.
Due to Market return stock 2 KG will processing loss or indivisible to loss.
As per business policy i can't change these BOM Header & Item Quantities.
The system cannot cost material A and issues an error message.
Scenario 2:
To Produce 100 Kgs of A Material(FG), We need B Material 98 KG(SFG).
Product is ready and despatched to Market.
After Some time Few Stocks will come as Market retunrs in FG Stage(A).
We need to Re-Process the same and stock will converted to SFG(B).
During this case also i am getting Recursive BOM errors.
Due to in A Material BOM ,B is a component already-Costing run Completed sent to Market. Now I am Converting the stock of A to B through a Production order while maintaining A as Component for B Material BOM.
Every stage i have alternative BOMs.
As per the requirement i can't avoid, Please suggest is there other user exits or Message control or Process to resolve the same.
Regards
Manoj Kumar Pedada
SAP CO Consultant

Sales andDidstribution BOM issue

Hi
Experts,
As my clint is in to IT industries like computer hardware sales, could you please any one of you explain the BOM configuration and details pertaining to BOM. Any help on this would be highly apreaciable
Thanks
Regards

Hi,
After assigning all necessary configuration of BOM, when i create sales order no BOM is getting displayed arei t have created material with LUMf item categeory group, suggest with solution.
thanks
Edited by: Ahmed quadry on Aug 11, 2009 2:24 PM

BOM Issue

Hi all,
Scenario: One Purchase order is created with a BOM material consisting of 3 components. For ex. Material X contains sub items as A, B,C. in one company code say IHK
Now based on this purchase order, a Sales Oder is created for the Material X where the components now will be A,B,C,D,E(Additional 2 material D and E) (in another company code say ULL)
now my pricing should take place at item level for only material D and E ( no pricing for material A,B,C)
How should i map this process?
Do i need to create Material X in two plants with subcomponents A,B,C in one plant AND A,B,C,D,E in other?
Please suggest in brief.
awaiting ur replies.
Cheers,
Anil.

Hiya
Try this Link
http://groups.google.co.in/group/sapSDtech/files
Regards

[Call for vote] UTF-8 BOM issue

Although in the FAQ, UTF-8 is recommended as the encoding to use[1], there exists a critical bug which stops users from using UTF-8 streams starting with a BOM[2]. :(
As you can see, this bug has been open for almost 4 years. I don't know how priority is set to bugs, but maybe it just needs more votes. Everybody interested in having this fixed and still have bug votes left, it would be great if you could vote for it. :)
[1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/corejava/intl/reference/faqs/index.html#recommended-charset
[2] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4508058

Kdcypher wrote:
We have a user who is receiving a lot of emails from an AOL address. Some of them open fine in CommExpress (UWC), but some don't, with the screen not changing when they click on the email, and all emails open fine in Pine.Let's start with the basics:
=> What version of UWC are you running (showrev -p | grep uwc)?
=> What browser is the user using to access the email?
=> Does this problem occur with different browsers?
=> Are there any javascript errors when the user clicks on the mail?
=> Is the content of the problem email(s) plain-text or HTML?
If an email cannot be opened then this is the problem that needs resolving.
where a sampling of the emails that do come up do not have utf-8 encoding specified.This may be a symptom rather then a cause, for example there could be a specific 8-bit (UTF-8 encoded) character which is causing the behaviour.
A quick Google search caused me to look at /opt/SUNWuwc/webmail/main.js, where I found a reference that said to uncomment a line to "enable fix for 6295293." This line is the only place in main.js that contains "utf-8," and another Google search shows that Sun bugid# 6295293 has a title of "UWC/Webmail Need the Ability to Change the Source Encoding from the Browser," which leads me to think that uncommenting this line could fix the problem.This RFE was to workaround email clients that were generating badly encoded emails which would display as "funny" characters in UWC/CE -- this wasn't to resolve a problem with the email not opening at all.
The idea was to provide a drop-down list of character sets so the user could manually select the appropriate encoding. This is along the same lines as the "View->Character Encoding" in Firefox and "View->Encoding" in IE.
Regards,
Shane.

Archive Material BOM issue

Hi everyone
I wanna archive all material BOM in a client server.
The client server only contain the material and BOM data.
I am using transaction code :CS28 and using object " CS_BOM " . The archive steps are:
1. actions->write
2. create a variant called "BOM"
3. in "BOM" variant maintainence screen,
      select "archive with direct deletion" ,
      select "selection by delete indicator" ,
      select " archive material BOM"
4. add description attribute for BOM variant.
5. save variant and execute the job.
However, when i saw the job overview , the created job is in complete status within several seconds. And i go to CS03 , there is still BOM record existed.
Do anyone know the correct way of archiving material BOM?
Thx~

"selection by date validity" will work only if you can give a date after the BOM validity dates. Check what is the validity dates in all your BOMs . If it is 31.12.9999 then this option will not work.
The only other option you have is to mark the deletion flag in all the BOMs and then use "Selection By Del Indicator".
If you have access to OSS , check note number 376650 , which give a program code which can set the deletion flag in all the BOMs. After this if you choose "Selection By Del Indicator" then I guess the BOMS should be removed from database.
Archiving has two actions - writing data to arcive file and delete data from database. You have not mentioned thus far that you file is written . If file is written correctly and data not deleted from database then problem is with deletion program.
If file also is not written ( is blank ) then your problem can be solved in the two ways I mention above, as then the problem lies with no BOMs selected for deletion/ archiving. Is the spool of your batch job blank.
Btw you are using the correct method of archiving BOMs . However there is a report RCBOMDEL which will delete all the BOM records from a client without archiving.
Cheers.

ECM for BOM issue

Dear All PP gurus,
Can you please guide me what to do in this caase please?
I have created BOM for material ZCONEGG48V has been created by error without change number
So it is valid from 20.04.2009 instead of desired 01.04.2009 .
I tried to change with Change number with date after Date valid from 20.04.2009, and I get this error message as below
Object management record cannot be generated .
Could you please tell me that what are the changes i will have to do so that this error will not come again?
Thanks,
Narayan

Dear Narayan,
You have not included the third check box against the Bill of material for the column Mgt.Rec under
object types while creating the change number.
So now goto CC02,enter the change number->click on object types>against bill of material include
the third check box for the column Mgt.Rec,save the datas.
Now you can use the change number for changing BOM.
This will solve your problem,check and come back with your queries.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Short Inventory Report - BoM issue

I am having a problem with the below query, I want to mutiply T0.OnHand with quantity in BoM but the problem is that Items in (106) use one item which i want to use but it varies in quantity per product in BoM. Is there anyway to map each code to its corresponding quantity in BoM.
SELECT T0.[ItemCode], T0.[ItemName], T0.[OnHand], T0.[OnOrder] as 'Ordered',sum(T0.[OnHand]+ T0.[OnOrder]) as 'Available', T0.[InvntryUom] FROM OITM T0 WHERE T0.ItmsGrpCod in (106) and T0.[ItemCode] <> 'FC005' and T0.[ItemName] <> 'Financial Correction - WIP Fat' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '1100003' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '1200004' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '1301210001' and T0.[ItemCode] <> 'FC001' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '20301300' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '20301400' and T0.[ItemCode] <> '2301210090' GROUP BY T0.[ItemCode],T0.[ItemName],T0.[OnHand], T0.[OnOrder],T0.[IsCommited],T0.[InvntryUom]
Thanks,
Titi

Thanks a lot Gordon for the simplification, learning a lot through this forum, here is a my query hope it is more clearer..
Product has 6 components required in BoM, but I want to mutiply using only one component. Below I want to use only number one item in one of those two BoMs. But I have different defintions in BoM depending on size cause I have products ranging from 750, 5ltrs etc
e.g on I want to include this column (T0.[OnHand]*Quantity) as 'Consumed Olin' but in one there is 8.1 and the other has 10.1
750mls
#     Item No.     Item Description            Quantity       UoM
1     1200004          Olin (Wip)               8.1            KG
2     2402710022     Jerrycan 750mls Bottle      12          PCS
3     1402410023     Labels 750mls Litre Oil      12          PCS
4     2402210006     Carton            750mls      1          PCS
5     1402110027     Sealing Tape               1          MTR
6     2402710018     750mls Oil bottles (labelled)     1          PCS
5ltrs
#     Item No.        Item Description            Quantity                  UoM
1     1200004          Olin (Wip)                     10.1            KG
2     2402710022     Jerrycan 5ltrs Bottle          5          PCS
3     1402410023     Labels 5ltrs Litre Oil           5          PCS
4     2402210006     Carton            5ltrs Litre      1          PCS
5     1402110027     Sealing Tape                     1          MTR
6     2402710018     5ltrs ml Oil bottles (labelled)     1          PCS
Thanks,
TitiKoko

SD-BOM issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for