Search results are differed in Quick and candidate searches

Hi Everyone,
I am using ECC 6 EhP 5 system with Trex search 7.10.48.
We are having a scenario where search is behaving differently in different places.
We are able to find some Locked candidates in quick Search (ERC_C_QUICK_SEARCH_UI) as well as in Candidate Search.
But as per standard behaviour the Locked candidates should not be able to search in Candidate Search.
So how to restrict the Locked candidates to able to see in Candidate search.
I tried SNOTE 1301016, i confused how to use that one.
Please help if you have faced similar issues.
Kind regards
Chetan

Hi Nicole,
I am able to find one entry in IT5134, So exactly where we need to check for the attachment status.
Below are the table entries
MANDT:300 PLVAR :01 OTYPE:NA OBJID: 50027289 SUBTY:0001 ISTAT:1 BEGDA: 17.03.2011 ENDDA: 31.12.9999 INFTY:5134 OTJID: NA50027289 AEDTM: 17.03.2011 UNAME: AMXJUE ATT TYPE: 12 ATTACHMENT:1 LANGUAGE:EN ATT HEADER: Juechter 2011 REC GUID: ATT GUID:
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards
Chetan

Similar Messages

Search results are not accurate

hi,
am facing a unique issue in SP 2013. Whenever we search for a search criteria the results returned is not accurate always. Every time we navigate across pages, the search results change which is not
a desired behavior. However we also noticed that the refiner panel does not change as well and it retains the old count which leads to inconsistent results when user selects a criteria from the refiner.
any pointers / helpful links regarding this issue, if any anyone has surfaced, is highly appreciated!
Das

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that search results are not accurate.
I recommend to run a full crawl and then to check whether the search results are correct.
If your incremental crawl is running, it may happen that, when you are viewing the data in the search result web part, the newly added content are not crawled yet.
So, after the content are updated, wait for some time.
Let your incremental crawl finish. Then view the results on the page.
More information:
Understanding how search results are displayed in SharePoint Server 2013
Searching new content with SharePoint Search
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

WCP Framework 11g and SES 11g : search results are not secured

Hello,
We are integrating WCP 11.1.1.6 and SES 11.1.2.2
we have quite a stunning issue here where the search results returned by a WCP Framework application are not secured, ie secured contents are returned in the search results for unauthenticated users and for users who have no permission on these contents.
Though, the search results are well secured in the standard SES search interface (http://seshost/search/query/).
The main concern is about results coming from WCC.
Thanks for any help,
Vince

Hi Jiri,
we managed to integrate UCM and WCP with Document Service taskflows and it works fine, ie security is well propagated for the roles we want.
WCC/UCM and WCP authenticate users via WLS which is connected to an AD.
SES has its own identity management system which authenticates users directly to the AD.
We activated the SESCrawler component in WCC/UCM and the SES/UCM crawling process is OK.
We can search for UCM contents in SES without issue and anonymous/unauthenticated search in SES doesn't return results from non-public security groups, which is what we want.
WCP search is connected to SES (which is the default setting), eg from adf-config.xml:
<searchC:adf-search-config xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/webcenter/search/config">
<display-properties>
<common numSavedSearches="5" />
<region-specific>
<usage id="simpleSearchResultUIMetadata" numServiceRows="5" />
<usage id="searchResultUIMetadata" numServiceRows="5" />
<usage id="localToolbarRegion" numServiceRows="5" />
</region-specific>
</display-properties>
<execution-properties timeoutMs="7000" prepareTimeoutMs="1000" />
<crawl-properties fullCrawlInterval="P5D" enableWcServicesCrawl="true" enableWcDiscussionsCrawl="true" enableWcUcmCrawl="true" />
<ses-properties>
<connection>ses</connection>
<data-group>SourceGroup</data-group>
</ses-properties>
</searchC:adf-search-config>
So the problem is that anonymous/unauthenticated search in WCP does return results from non-public security groups, which is not what we want.
eg: access to the WCP app (don't logon)
run a search
in the search results, you can see contents which are not assigned in the public security group. Though, the WCC/UCM guest role doesn't have any permission on these SG.
I can't raise SR myself.
Thanks for any help,

Safari troubleshooting needed. All search results are grayed out preventing me from clicking anything on the page.

Safari Problem: After doing a search using all three of the search engines the search results are grayed out not allowing me to click on anything on the page. I also can't use the buttons to the left of the search box. Please help.

Go back to your home screen, then double click your home button to open your multi-task window hold your finger on the Safari icon until it start to wiggle and a red minus sign is in the upper left corner. Tap the red minus sign and completely close Safari, then reopen it.

Search results are blank white pages?

Ever since the last upgrade Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) I am having constant trouble with blank white search results. Also, pages load and are white and blank and it shoes the staus as done. I am ready to jump ship. Any fixes? Thanks

See [[Images or animations do not show]] and http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_or_animations_do_not_load
Check the image exceptions: Tools > Options > Content: Load Images: Exceptions - See [[Options window - Content panel]]
A way to see which images are blocked is to click the favicon (Site Identification icon) on the left side of the location bar.
A click on the "More Information" button will open the Security tab of the "Page Info" window (also accessible via "Tools > Page Info").
Open the Media tab of the "Page Info" window.
Select the first image and scroll down though the list with the Down arrow key.
If an image in the list is grayed and there is a check-mark in the box "Block Images from..." then remove that mark to unblock the images from that domain.

What are different between gateway and mangement server in scom ?

Hi all,
can anyone let me know What are different between gateway and mangement server in scom ?
thanks,
Sengottuvel M

Hi,
Hope this can answer you question
About Gateway Servers in Operations Manager
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212823.aspx
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

What are different vru types and their functions

Dear experts,
what are different vru types and their functions

Hi,
just hit the Help button in "Network VRU Explorer" in ICM Configuration Manager.
If you wish to see even more details, take a look at the following article:
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1822061&seqNum=2
HTH
G.

The risk analysis results are different when choose report type as "summary" and "management" summary

Hello experts,
I found a expired user with SOD conflicts in "management summary" report format, but it doesn't exist in "Summary" report. You can find the screenshot in attached file. The user name is "YINPENG2_BK".
What happened? The result of different report formats are from different data source?
Sincerely yours,
Lynn

Hi Lynn,
that's not an issue from the system. It's more a handling issue as the results are splitted into several result sets. In management summary view you have only one result set as it's grouped by user and risk, whereas you have more than one in summary view (as you have multple entries for each user and risk).
Change to the second, third, etc. result set and you will see the user in the list:
Regards,
Alessandro

Different sequence of search results in different environments with same set of documents

I am using Sharepoint 2013 Foundation version.
I have set up 2 environments (say environment A and environment B) with the same Window baseline and Sharepoint server farm setup. The similar set of documents have been uploaded to both environments. With input of exactly the same search string at the search
field and enter button pressed, the sequences of entries shown on search result page are different in these 2 environments.
In particular, there is a document 'Monthly Newsletter.pdf' uploaded in both environments. When I type 'Monthly Newsletter' in search field and press enter, this document appears as the first entry in the search result in environment A, but this same document
appears as the 8th entry in the search result in environment B.
May I know the reason? Thanks a lot for advice!

There are a lot of factors that go into computing the "relevance" of any one document. One factor is "closeness". So one question would be how identical are the two environments? Same number of site collections? Are the
documents at the same depth? (sites -> subsites -> libraries -> folders) Are the libraries of the same type, using the same content types and the same metadata> In both cases are you searching from
the same site and are the documents at the same depth?
Ranking is also impacted by past searches. The more people who have clicked through to the document, the higher it will be ranked in the future.
If the two environments are identical, and are only being used for testing, Reset the Indexes and do a new Full Crawl and then test.
Mike Smith TechTrainingNotes.blogspot.com
Books:
SharePoint 2007 2010 Customization for the Site Owner,
SharePoint 2010 Security for the Site Owner

My google search results are displayed shortened in firefox

Hello, my name is Timothy White, and I use FireFox almost exclusively as my browser and I noticed some months back that my google search results for the "shopping" engine suddenly became shortened. That is to say that depending on what I search for, I have only 2-4 or so columns of results displayed. The weirdest part is if I change the results to be displayed by price rather than by relevance, I often receive totally different results that were not displayed before.
Naturally, I harassed the google technical help twice before I received an answer, which was that they had no idea what I was talking about. Thinking that this may not be a problem on their end, I mirrored my search results in Internet Explorer as well, and found that IE gave me many pages of results. Changing the sorting there, gave me the same first 2 or 3 pages FireFox displayed, followed by ll the rest.
So FireFox is somehow cutting off the product searches after a certain number of results. I searched google (on IE now of course), and your technical help database to see if anyone else had this problem, and as far as I know, its a new one. Either that or you guys are playing a cruel trick on me, which I hope is not true, or I am going completely crazy, which I really, really hope is not true either.
So, are there any ideas why this is happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated, and let me know if you need any more info. Thanks,
~Tim

You can check for corrupted and duplicate fonts and other font issues:
*http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/multipleappsquit.html - Font Book 2.0 Help: Checking for damaged fonts
*http://www.creativetechs.com/iq/garbled_fonts_troubleshooting_guide.html
You can do a font test to see if you can identify corrupted font(s).
*http://browserspy.dk/fonts-flash.php?detail=1
You can try different default fonts and temporarily disable website fonts to test the selected default font.
*Firefox > Preferences > Content : Fonts & Colors > Advanced [ ] "Allow pages to choose their own fonts, instead of my selections above"

Links from Search Results are not resolving or take a very long time.

The searches happen fairly quickly, but the links from the results are not resolving. I am unable to get the information I need. It appears there are performance problems with the site.
Lennie

This is the same problem I just posted on for searching DOC SITE!

Search Results Web Part, Managed Navigation and Paging

I am using managed navigation and have a search results web part that uses the Term.IdWithChildren as the query to filter the results by the selected navigation term. This works nicely until you need to us the paging. As soon as you go to the next page there are
no results.
It would appear that as soon as the URL has the #k=#s=11 added it looses the navigation term. This is a core part of the Sharepoint solution that I'm delivering and I cannot progress this any further and I'm going round in circles. I have another results
page that has the search results webpart on but doesn't use the navigation term filtering and the paging works fine.
As an alternative I was looking at writing my own search results web part, can I do this and render the sharepoint display templates somehow?
Any help would be appreciated.
Stuart

Hi Stuart,
i suppose you may need to check your design regarding this custom coding,
as i know, when i tried previously, i didn't take any attention on the query result, so that it appear as no result.
please have a check this links, it helped me once,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg549981.aspx
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/59e6e258-294d-44b2-996a-547e4e9f519d/customize-search-statistics-and-search-paging-web-parts
http://kamilmka.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/customize-sharepoint-search-results-paging/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sanjaynarang/archive/2009/02/20/handling-paging-and-total-results-count-in-sharepoint-custom-results-page.aspx
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items

Hi everybody
I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
added to arguments.
Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
was not sent to advance search method.
Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best Regards
Navid

Navid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Colors are different between Lightroom and Photoshop Elements

I have a new monitor and I have the SyderPro4 calbration software. My monitor is the Dell UltraSharp U2713HM. When calibrated with the Syder my colors are different when I go into different programs. The same photo looks different in Lightroom than it does in Photoshop Elements. When I export the picture from Lightroom to Elements the picture becomes very orange. I have already talked to Dell and to Datacolor about my issue and they both are telling me this shouldn't be happening. When I uninstall my calibration software my problem goes away, and the colors of the images stay consistant between the two programs. Does anybody have any advice to what maybe wrong?

I am having this problem too.
my site www.redsmartie.com looks fine on everyone elses computer but on mine the red background #660000 is not displaying right on the jpg images
see here http://homepage.mac.com/redsmartie/colourerror.png
I have rgb colour profiles managed by a Pantone Huey device and haven't previously noted a problem. This was added recently so I recreated the images which corrected things on my screen but made the red around the images too dark for everyone else.
The images were created in Photoshop so I changed the photoshop profile back to CinemaDisplay that it previously was on and now everyone else is ok but my screen shows the red around the images much to light.
I really need some help with this as its a disaster waiting to happen on work I do for other people, especially if I'm producing work that looks right on my setup but is wrong for everyone else!
Dual 2GHz PowerMac G5 (plus 15" G4 PowerBook) Mac OS X (10.4.6) 2.5 GB DDR SDRAM, 2x160GB SATA, 23" Cinema HD Display

Search Results Are Highlighted Within The Text Box? How ? Access 2013

Hi Every one ,
Below I am describing some coding issue in VBA-MS Access I am facing right now , and I hope u guys could help me resolve the issues :
DB : MS access 2013 - RichTextBox In A Form -
Language : VBA
Problem In short : struggling to highlighting user search word within the search result query ..
What I want :
Helping to fix the second code shown below , the one I used to highlight ( reformat ) the text who's bound to a a field that store memo data type . code
My Result Search Query VBA COde ( Work perfectly )
strWhereToSearch = IIf(.framSearchIn.Value = 1, "[quknotSubject]", "[quknotBody] ")
strCondition = strWhereToSearch & " Like '* " & strTextSearch & " *' OR " & _
strWhereToSearch & " Like '" & strTextSearch & " *' OR " & _
strWhereToSearch & "Like '* " & strTextSearch & "'"
strSql = " Select * from qryExtraTool_QuickNoteSubCatMainCat "
strSql = strSql & " WHERE " & strCondition & " ORDER BY quknotDate"
The code that i am struggling to make it work for me to highlight the search word inside the textbox called .txtQuickNoteBody :
'Control Source for the text box to display matches.
Const strcTagStart = ""
Const strcTagEnd = ""
strControlSource = "=IIf(" & strField & " Is Null, Null, " & _
"Replace(" & strField & ", """ & strSearchValue & """, """ & _
strcTagStart & strSearchValue & strcTagEnd & """))
.txtQuickNoteBody.ControlSource = strControlSource
Thank u all in advance .

Thank u so Bruce , I finally found an answer to my question.
The solution u provided looks complete except that i am confused by the meaning of strField , may i didnt provide more details in my post .
The strField var i provided earlier was not meant to be placed in my code , the correct one is shown below .However , the strField means according to me is the field against which the search operation should take place based on the ( search Term )
the user provided .
Here is the code after applying the solution u suggested :
'Information collected from the user
strWhereToSearch = IIf(.framSearchIn.Value = 1, "[quknotSubject]", "[quknotBody] ")
strCondition = strWhereToSearch & " Like '* " & strTextSearch & " *' OR " & _
strWhereToSearch & " Like '" & strTextSearch & " *' OR " & _
strWhereToSearch & "Like '* " & strTextSearch & "'"
'Fill result search Recordset
strSql = " Select * from qryExtraTool_QuickNoteSubCatMainCat "
strSql = strSql & " WHERE " & strCondition & " ORDER BY quknotDate"
'Control Source for the text box to display matches. ( Highlight the search word )
txtQuickNoteBody = SearchHilight(strWhereToSearch, strTextSearch)
Tell me if my implementation to your code is right ?
Thank u again Bruce ...

Search results are differed in Quick and candidate searches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for