Search spec not working for Multiple Business Object in Siebel

Hi,
In Siebel Applicaiton Specified Search spec in Administration - BI Reports->Standard Templates-> integtion Object. the Specified Search spec is not returning particular record. It's seems returning all records. below we are using search spec as [Row Id] = [Quote.BillingaccountId].
for testing purpose specified how code value : [Row Id]='1-wXR8'(some BillingaccountId in our application from Quote Object).
Does anybody worked on Searchspec for MultipleBusienssObjects and is the search spec syntax is correct.
Thanks
-Chakri

Hi Ravi..
thanks for replay. with SR you provided getting no search results. If you have already can you please email me at [email protected]
And also mention format as IO1.Field1=IO2.Field2. Need to give IO.fieldname i.e Integration Object Name .Field name or IC.Fieldname.. Can you please correct.
Thanks
-Chakri

Similar Messages

  • Search is not working for subsites

    hello,
    SharePoint search is not working for any of the subsites and it is just working for top level site. I can see that all the subsites is visible in search. Any idea?
    interesting thing is, it is not working just for one site collection subsites. If i do search in subsites of another site collection of the same web application than it is working fine and it is working fine for all ohter web apps too.
    Please help.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    I agree with Chris, please check following in your sub site: http://site_name/subsite_name
    1. Click on Site Actions -> Site Settings ->Modify All Site Settings
    2. Click on Search visibility.
    3. Check All this web to appear in search results.
    4. Browse to the document library or list  in your sub site.
    5. Click on Settings->Document Library Settings or list settings.
    6. Click on Advance settings.
    7. Check the last item - All items from this document library to appear in search results.
    Hope this helps.
    Rock Wang
    Rock Wang– MSFT

  • Transaction launcher not working for custom business role

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a very weird problem where the transaction laucher define for BOR transaction is working for one business role(Z business role Customized one) but its not working for other business role (Z business role).
    to emphasize further we have the code:-
    case ls_attributes-object_type.
        when lc_z23 or lc_z25.
          lv_logical_link = lc_ZITISU.
        when lc_BUS2000115.
          lv_logical_link = lc_ZITERP1.
        when others.
          lv_logical_link = lc_ZITERP2.
      endcase.
      l_if_navigation = cl_crm_ui_navigation_service=>get_instance( me ).
      IF l_if_navigation IS BOUND .
    Navigate to transaction launcher using link id
        l_if_navigation->navigate( iv_link_id = lv_logical_link ).
      ENDIF.
    in this the logical link is is lc_ZITISU whenever this BSP application is called from both the business roles but in  one the window opens up for BOR transaction whereas when we login again using different business role the code is the same as given above. I mean the sam logical link id is used and navigated to but window is not opening for transaction launcher as it happens for the previous business role.
    Request your help to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Rajwin

    Hi,
    I tried by applying the PFCG role id of business role which was working to the business role id of the one for which it wasn't working and then try testing whether the transaction launcher is triggering. But the transaction launcher screen is still not opening even after doing this.
    Probably there's something else too which is causing the problem. Request your inputs on this,
    Thanks,
    Rajwin

  • Search suggestion not working for anonymous user in sharepoint 2013

    Hi ,
    Please help on this search suggestion not working for anonymous user in sharepoint 2013
    shaik

    You can create a search center site, and set the search center site to
    allow anonymous access.
    Also see this link - http://blog.mastykarz.nl/search-query-suggestions-anonymous-users-sharepoint-2013-mavention-query-suggestions/ 
     (As this is regarding a 3rd party tool, I suggest that you direct it to the  provider support.)
    Please 'propose as answer' if it helped you, also 'vote helpful' if you like this reply.

  • In Robohelp 9, search does not work for some Vietnamese characters.

    In Robohelp 9, search does not work for some Vietnamese characters.

    I don't think there is anything we can do on a user to user forum. I suggest you report this to Adobe as a bug. Please follow this link.
    http://www.Adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&product=38
    If you need a more immediate response, you would need to take that up with Adobe support.
    See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
    @petergrainge

  • Search is not working for MS Word documents

    Hi,
    serious help required for search operation.
    Search operation is not working for MS Word Documents.
    i noticed that, after chekin word documents its status comes as
    GENWWW.
    i already enable file format & extension for word file.
    can somebody help me in this regard.
    Thankx in advance

    Hi
    Please enable the tracing option for :
    requestaudit,indexer
    Enable Full Verbose Tracing .
    Checkin the Ms-Word document and once it fails then check the view server o/p under System Audit Information page and post the error message happening for indexing operation .
    Thanks
    Srinath

  • ECR/ECO Workflow not working for multiple Objects

    Hello all,
    We have implemented ECR/ECO workflow by customizing the SAP standard one. We are facing a problem when entering multiple ECO objects such as mutiple Documents, materials, BOMs etc. When we create the ECR, two parralel workflow start (one for ECM and other for ECO) and depending on how many ECO objects we have included, multiple instances of ECO workflows will trigger (I think this is the standard behaviour as well but not sure)
    In our workflow, we have a wait step in ECO workflow that waits until ECM has been converted into ECO (ECOP status) and starts the ECO workflow. Also, we have created a Wait step in ECM workflow and that waits until the ECO workflows have reached the CONFIRMATED Step when the processing of the objects are finished.
    When we enter one object, both workflows start and ECO waits until ECM has been converted into ECO and then start the processing the Objects. when the ECO workflow is done (Status confirmated), it switches back to ECM workflow and then goes on with Close/Release steps of the Objects/ECO etc.
             But, when we have multiple ECO objects, both start well as ECR converts to ECO and the ECO starts and then work items are processed but then stops just before the CONRIMATED steps even though all objects are changed/maintained properly and  ECO workflows are completed. As a result, the control doesn't refer back to ECM and we never get the ECO close and Release step work items.
    I have checked SWETYPV, SWEL, business objects ECM and ECO but nothing gives a result..
    Any help would be appreciated..
    Thanks

    Can you please update on what is the status in the workflow log. You can check this from SWIA tcode.
    If it is in process step please check for ST22 dump if any.
    Thanks
    Arghadip

  • Search function not working for few days ??

    I try to search for object that I have searched before and got results.
    now I don't get any result on any search query I give. yesterday I thought , OK I will wait for tomorrow then it will be resolved. but now it's still not working ?
    for instance search on CL_SALV_TABLE is giving no results ?
    am I the only one experiencing this problem or is it community wide ?
    kind regards
    arthur

    Hi Arthur,
    we are aware of the current search problem and our development team is working on it. In future please report such bugs to [email protected]
    Regards,
    Folkert

  • Search is not working for only one site collection

    Hi All,
    I have one issue where users are searching something on a site collection nothing is coming out.  Search is working on web application level but not in only one site collection.
    I checked the crawl log and found  below error for this site collection

    Hi Aditya,
    From the error message, there might be several reasons:
    Configure search time-out settings (Search Server 2010):
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee808892.aspx
    Please check the user accounts created under the home group that could push the limit of the ACL, and this error message may be occur:
    http://www.sweendog.net/blogengine/post/2012/02/03/The-Filter-Daemon-has-Timed-Out.aspx & http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/26755/sharepoint-2010-search-server-not-crawling-content-due-to-filter-daemon-timeout
    Make sure the search service account has access to SearchIndex share:
    http://www.sharepointsecurity.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-development/fixing-the-filter-daemon-did-not-respond-within-the-timeout-limit-error/
    If the links above doesn’t help, please collect more error message in ULS log for troubleshooting.
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Bug: Text Search is not working for Excel spreadsheets

    Hi,
    We have published several Excel, Word and PowerPoint file items to our portal application content area.
    However, The intermedia text search is not returning the excel files - it is working on other file formats though!
    I have even tried directly issueing select from sqlplus. eg.,:
    select name,filename from wwv_document$ where name like '%.XLS'
    AND CONTAINS(BLOB_CONTENT,'network')>0;
    Result>> No rows selected.
    We are using Portal3.0.9 and 8.1.7 DB.
    Thanks in advance!
    Ram

    Firstly, are you syncronizing your indexes. Newly added content is not searchable until the indexes have been synced. See the Portal configuration guide for how to do this.
    Are your Excel files being indexed successfull? After indexing, are there any entries for the WWSBR_DOC_CTX_INDX in the ctx_user_index_errors view. You should be able to join via the rowid to the wwdoc_document$ table to see which docs are failing if any are.

  • EXIT_SAPLV50E_001 User Exit is not working for multiple plants case

    Hi,
    I have to update foreign trade data in Invoice during invoice creation using VF11. For that, I have written code in EXIT_SAPLV50E_001 and updated segal value. This functionality is working fine, if I have a single plant in an invoice. But customer has scenario where they can have multipl plants in an invoice.
    For multiple plants in an invoice, this EXIT_SAPLV50E_001 is not called.
    I am unable to find another better place where in I could place my code. Please help. Remember, case in multiple plants.
    Will be rewarded.
    Regards
    Arpit

    Hi Arpit,
                   Please use below mentioned user exit in T-code VF11
    he following user exits are available for tcode VF11
    Exit Name           Description
    SDVFX001            User exit header line in delivery to accounting
    SDVFX002            User exit for A/R line in transfer to accounting
    SDVFX003            User exit cash clearing in transfer to accounting
    SDVFX004            User exit G/L line in transfer to accounting
    SDVFX005            User exit reserves in transfer to accounting
    SDVFX006            User exit tax line in transfer to accounting
    SDVFX007            User exit: Billing plan during transfer to Accounting
    SDVFX008            User exit: Processing of transfer structures SD-FI
    SDVFX009            Billing doc. processing KIDONO (payment reference number)
    SDVFX010            User exit item table for the customer lines
    SDVFX011            Userexit for the komkcv- and kompcv-structures
    V05I0001            User exits for billing index
    V05N0001            User Exits for Printing Billing Docs. using POR Procedure
    V60A0001            Customer functions in the billing document
    V60P0001            Data provision for additional fields for display in lists
    V61A0001            Customer enhancement: Pricing
    J_3RSINV            Customer enhancement: Pricing
    or You can use BADI
    BADI_SD_SALES_BASIC
    BADI_SD_TO_FM
    BADI_SD_BILLING
    Regards,
        Thangam.P

  • Calculation formula userexit not working for multiple condition types

    Hi,
    we have a problem in the CRM ISA-B2B scenario where the custom user exit is only working for single condition type.
    but we need it for multiple condition types .
    the value of the subtotal is not being retrieved for multiple conditions. at a time only one condition value is being retrieved and shown in the webshop - shopping basket.
    for ex:
    we have scenario 1 where Y001 -Freight condition type is applicable for one customer.and Y002 is applicable for another customer.
    when we are trying to show the subtotal condition value in the webshop by using a single custom user exit in the pricing procedure it is only working for either of the above 2 customers depending on the VMC cache status.
    is there any problem if use the single user exit for both condition types?
    and if it needs to be differentiated how exactly we can do that with the same logic in the java class.
    Thanks in advance,
    PSR.

    Hi Arshi,
    below is the code:
    public class ZValFormula_ZZWI1 extends ValueFormulaAdapter {
         private static String zzwi = "ZZWI1";
         private static char  zzwiC = '@';
         private static UserexitLogger userexitlogger = new UserexitLogger(
         ZValFormula_ZZWI1.class);
         public BigDecimal overwriteConditionValue(IPricingItemUserExit item,
                   IPricingConditionUserExit condition) {
              ICurrencyValue val = condition.getConditionValue();
              userexitlogger.writeLogDebug( "value saved for " + zzwi + " (" + zzwiC + ") = "
                        + val.getValueAsString());
              item.setSubtotal( zzwiC, val.getValue());
              return val.getValue();
    hope this would give more idea to look at the problem.
    Thanks,
    PSR

  • 3.4: keyword auto-completion not working for multiple levels

    Auto-completion does not work with higher level keywords, which used to work in LR 3.3 (IIRC).
    Example:
    I enter in the "Click here to add keywords" field:
    "He" then LR tries to complete the keyword by showing keywords starting with "He". Fine.
    But this is a keyword which does not exist so far, so I enter "Heldenplatz > W" because I want to have sorted it under Wien. If I'm not mistaken, LR 3.3 showed after entering the "W" a list of existing keywords starting with W (auto-completion for the one level higher tag). This is not the case anymore. I have to enter  "Heldenplatz > Wien" completely, which makes it slow and error-prone.
    Am I mistaken or can you reproduce it?
    Cheers

    GaryRowe wrote:
    How can it be, after all this time, that they still do not have effective regression testing in place ? Any sane development team (who wants to remain sane ;-) builds this as a priority ... unless they aren't given the resources?
    I think (don't remember though) that this never worked, so regression testing would not have helped.
    What is really to worry, that features aren't consequently and completely implemented (and tested). With a new option in Lightroom 3, Adobe has offered support for keywords with spaces. It seems that this feature as neither been thoroughly analysed or implemented. Thus, we face the currently inconsequent support of it:
    keyword completion only works with the first entered word, but when you enter a complete keyword hierarchy using the ">" letters
    filtering seems to have problems too

  • HT2486 Smart Group not working for Multiple 'Not a Member of' Options

    I am trying to go through my contacts and assign everyone to a group.  I want to create a smart group whose criteria is "not in Group 1" AND 'Not in Group 2'.
    This does not work.  It simply gives me all the contacts.
    Also, is there anyone to see a contact and know to which groups they belong.  When I can't remember who someone is, it is helpful if I know what group.

    I have a different conclusion : for me, it works since 10.9 where it has never worked before (and I just checked it still works with 10.9.1) !
    I did not modified my groups, they simply started to work properly with 10.9.

  • LookUpSet is Not working for multiple columns in SSRS 2008 R2

    Hi Friends,
    I have a problem when i use more than one LookUpSet in SSRS to display more than one value based on Day Number & other fields..Please find the below details and please suggest me a solution for this.
    Crystal : 
                    Day1                              Day2
    Period 4     Arts,Maths               Arts,Maths
    For this in SSRS i am using LookUpSet as below based on StaffID,PeriodNumber & DayNumber like  this:
    = (IIF(Fields!DayNumber.Value=1,Join(LookupSet(Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value &  Fields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value & Fields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!ClassCode.Value
        , "TIMSTF5"), "," ),"")) 
    which is displaying correct in SSRS,But when i use the same expression to display Day 2 classes it is returning empty even though i have values on Day 2.Please have a look at the SSRS output below:
                    Day1                              Day2
    Period 4     Arts,Maths              
    Day 2 Expression is :
    = (IIF(Fields!DayNumber.Value=2,Join(LookupSet(Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value &  Fields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value & Fields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!ClassCode.Value
        , "TIMSTF5"), "," ),""))
    I am not sure why it is not liking to use more than LookUpSet in the same report,Please suggest me with a work around for this.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sam.

    Hi Guys,
    I have sorted out the problem.Solution for the above problem is use Max before the expression like below, since it has multiple days and periods in the Dataset.
    = Max((IIF(Fields!DayNumber.Value=2,Join(LookupSet(Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value &  ields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!StaffID.Value & Fields!PeriodNumber.Value & Fields!DayNumber.Value
        , Fields!ClassCode.Value
        , "TIMSTF5"), ","  + vbcrlf),"")))
    Thanks,
    Sam

Maybe you are looking for