Search UCM service returns wrong results

Hi,
I am trying to get all the files in the specific folder. Here my folder name is 'Sudha',it is under 'Contribution Folder'.
Actual images i could see and uploaded under this folder are only four (WINTER,WATERLILLIES,SUNSET,Test_FINAL) ,
But I am getting 20 files under this folder when i m calling Search web service.
I could nt figure out wher the mistake is and how i got these images.
any suggestions plz.
Thanks

In my list, I have the column name as Department. I see 3 properties in the Search Schema.
How to you to tell which property matches with the column in your list?
Property Name
Type
Multi
Query
Search
Retrieve
Refine
Sort
Safe
Mapped Crawled Properties
Aliases
Department
Text
Query
Retrieve
Refine
Safe
People:Department,
ows_Department
urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:portal:profile:Department
DepartmentOWSTEXT
Text
Query
Search
Retrieve
Safe
ows_q_TEXT_Department
owstaxIdSPShDepartment
Text
Multi
Query
Search
Retrieve
Safe
ows_taxId_SPShDepartment
Paul

Similar Messages

Please Help Urgent:Fast Search returning wrong result sets

Hi All,
We are facing below issue with fast search.
Currently in My project when we are searching for a phrase it is returning wrong result sets.
For example if we search for “Endura”, It is returning documents related to
Endura as well as Centura.
But the expected results are only Endura documents.
When we look in to the documents we didn’t find the search term (“Endura” ) either inside document content or in its meta data.
In order to resolve the issue we tried the below steps
1-
We manually edited and saved the document, to ensure the appropriate Guid association to metadata.
2-
Index reset
3-
Full crawl
But no luck so far.
Please help.Thanks in advance.
Regards
Subrat

Subrat,
This may be related to spellchecking or may be synonym. Spellcheck is based on indexed terms.
The best test would be to run the queries from qrserver (13280) and then look at the spellcheck query transformations. If spellchecking is not doing it, then you must have a synonym setup .Check your keyword/synonyms from the SharePoint side.

cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.

<cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.
I am using BEA 9.1 content management services API. When I run the following query I am not receiving any results. Also no error or exceptions are seen in the weblogic or cmspi log.
The query is <cm:search id="docs" query="!(object_name like 'Sport*')" />

HI cam
Thanks for your reply, but i found the problem it was because my server administrator password has changed by network guys... and because of it crawler unable to access the content
I wrote my solution here i hope it will help other people
http://bvs-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2015/03/sharepoint-search-is-not-returning.html
RB

Content Search Web Part displaying wrong Results for anonymous Users.

HI Forum Group,
I am getting Wrong results for my content search web part. The requirement is to show the News Description for the selected news item.
I have a catalog site which stores News like
News1
News2
News3
as Items. and i have connected this catalog in publishing site which is anonymous. In the publishing site created one page "News.aspx"added search results webpart which shows all the news item. Added one page "Description.aspx" to show
description to show the selected news item.
When ever user selects any news from news.aspx page it will redirected to description.aspx with the selected item ID
The "Description.aspx" the search results page gets the data based on the URL by QueryString parameter as shown below
The problem is, if i multiple items to open in tabs all the items are showing the data same as the first selected item, though the article ID is different.
Thanks
Sithender

Hi，
Thank you for your feedback on how you were successful in resolving this issue.
Your solution will benefit many other users, and we really value having you as a Microsoft customer.
Have a nice day!
Best Regards，
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Spotlight returns wrong results

After installing Yosemite on my MacBook Pro, I tried to use Spotlight on some simple searches, with startling results. For example, I looked for Spotlight help...and a Word for Mac file opened. I recognize that Spotlight scours my Mac for material, but I do not understand why it would open a file that has nothing to do with the search terms.
Can anyone hazard a guess about what may be happening?

Did it and it worked to add _spotlight to the ACLs but Spotlight still return blank results on AFP clients...
Do you know what should be the permissions on the .spotlight-V100 folder?
Spotlight works on the servers so the index is fine. It's the AFP clients that can't read it properly or don't get all the data from it.

[HELP] AGO function return wrong result

Hi, i try to implement ago function in OBIEE, but the result is not as expected. Please help me to configure Time Dimension to get this work.
My case:
- I have a time dimension with this configuration:
[http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/1-1.png]
Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
Year:
Primary key: Calendar_year_cal_year_code
Chronological key: Does not define
Quarter:
Primary key: Calendar_quarter_description
Chronological key: Does not define
Month:
Primary key: Calendar_month_description
Chronological key: Calendar_month_description
Day:
Primary key: Dimension_key
Chronological key: Day_day_code
My ago function: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 1)
I do not understand why i get this wrong results:
[http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/2.png]
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Edited by: 864451 on Jun 8, 2011 5:11 AM

Hi, thanks for your reply.
I implemented Time dimension with your recommend, and have time dimension like this:
Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
Year:
Primary key: Calendar_year_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_year_start_date
Quarter:
Primary key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
Month:
Primary key: Calendar_month_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_month_start_date
Day:
Primary key: Day
Chronological key: Dimension_key
And Ago function works fine with month level: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", n)
But return sum result of 12 month with: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."year", 1)
In my case, i just use AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 12) to get year ago value. But i still don't understand clearly about OBIEE Time Serries functions.
Thanks,
Dung Nguyen

Mac Mail "Search" won't return any results

Hi,
Mac Mail- OS X Yosemite 10.10.2
I'm having trouble with the search feature on my Mac Mail. I'm using an IMAP account with: Inbox, Drafts, Sent, Junk and trash mailboxes. I also have folders under the "On My Mac" section. When I click on a folder, either "Inbox" or a mailbox "On My Mac" and try and search for an email no results are returned even though there should be multiple hits. I see multiple emails from John Doe prior to entering John Doe in the search bar and no results are returned even when I switch the search criteria to either "From", "To" or "Any".
Also is there any way to search all folders in Mac Mail at once without having to click on each folder and search it individually?
Any help would be appreciated
Thank you
T

First, take all the applicable steps in this support article that you haven't already taken. If the problem isn't solved that way, see below.
Restart the computer in safe mode. Certain caches maintained by the system will be rebuilt.
Safe mode is much slower to start up than normal. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
When the login screen appears, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and test. There's no need to log in while in safe mode.
Note: If FileVault is enabled in OS X 10.9 or earlier, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t start in safe mode. In that case, ask for instructions.

WebService returning wrong result

Hi All,
I am trying to write a webservice but somehow getting wrong result. Not sure where i am going wrong. I am seeing following in logs -
Request envelop -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soapenv:Body>
<Multiply xmlns="http://tempuri.org/">
<A xsi:type="xsd:float" xmlns="">40.0</A>
<B xsi:type="xsd:float" xmlns="">20.0</B>
</Multiply>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Response -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body><MultiplyResponse xmlns="http://tempuri.org/"><MultiplyResult>0</MultiplyResult></MultiplyResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
This is a webservice available online url - http://samples.gotdotnet.com/quickstart/aspplus/samples/services/MathService/VB/MathService.asmx?op=Multiply
Please HELP!!! Thanks in advance.
-Tarun

send this and write the results...
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SOAP-ENC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
     <SOAP-ENV:Body>
          <m:Multiply xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/">
               <m:A>3.14159E0</m:A>
               <m:B>3.14159E0</m:B>
          </m:Multiply>
     </SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

Simple query with like return wrong result

Hi,
I run simple query with like.
If I use parameter I get wrong results.
If I use query without parameter results are ok.
My script:
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
-- drop table abcd;
create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
insert into abcd values ('111222');
SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1; -- wrong result with value 12%
COL1
122222
*111222*
select * from abcd where col1 like '12%'; -- result ok
COL1
122222
I use Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
and query run in Oracle SQL Developer 3.1.07.

Hi,
welcome to the forum.
When you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
i.e.:
{noformat}{noformat}
SELECT ...
{noformat}{noformat}
You should specify exactly how you run your code.
If I run this statement in SQL Plus:SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
Session altered.
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
Session altered.
SQL>
SQL> -- drop table abcd;
SQL> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
1 row created.
SQL> insert into abcd values ('111222');
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "1" not declared.
SQL>
I got this error. So I wonder how you set value 12%
Please specify exactly how you run your test as we cannot reproduce your problem.
Regards.
Al

Query returning wrong results - Help required.

Hi All,
I am having a query in which I have 10 records, 5 with stop time 1 and 5 with stop time 2.
I have a scenario in which, I need to calculate the maximum,minimum for the records
with stop time 1 and 2.
What I did is, I selected all the 10 records using for loop. Within the loop
I am trying to find the maximum and minimum. It is giving me wrong results.
Please help me. My code is follows
declare
     v_p1_min_stop_tm     number;
     v_p1_max_stop_tm     number;
     v_p2_min_stop_tm     number;
     v_p2_max_stop_tm     number;
begin
     for i in(
          select
               stop_tm
          from
               sample_stop
          where
               map_nbr = 16645 and
               stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
     )loop
          if i.stop_tm = 1 then
               select
                    min(i.stop_tm),
                    max(i.stop_tm)
               into
                    v_p1_min_stop_tm,
                    v_p1_max_stop_tm
               from
                    dual;
          elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
               select
                    min(i.stop_tm),
                    max(i.stop_tm)
               into
                    v_p2_min_stop_tm,
                    v_p2_max_stop_tm
               from
                    dual;
          end if;
     end loop;
     dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
end;
My o/p is :
Minimum P1 stop time : 523
Maximum P1 stop time : 523
Minimum P2 stop time : 719
Maximum P2 stop time : 719
Here how can I make the data as two sets, one set with stop time 1 and
other with stop time 2.
Regards
Raghu

If the data type of stop_tm is varchar then try following
declare
     v_p1_min_stop_tm number;
     v_p1_max_stop_tm number;
     v_p2_min_stop_tm number;
     v_p2_max_stop_tm number;
begin
     for i in(select stop_tm from sample_stop
          where
               map_nbr = 16645 and
               stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
          )loop
     if i.stop_tm = 1 then
          select min(to_number(i.stop_tm)), max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
               into v_p1_min_stop_tm,v_p1_max_stop_tm
          from
               dual;
     elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
          select
               min(to_number(i.stop_tm)),     max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
               into
               v_p2_min_stop_tm,v_p2_max_stop_tm
          from
               dual;
     end if;
end loop;
dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
end;
/ Regards
Singh

Directory search returns wrong results when you modify the view

Hello,
I have a custom list used a staff directory. This is SharePoint 2013. I am using a search box where users can type in names to find people.
When I add or remove a record in the list or modify the view and then I search for my name, all search results appear. It once just returned 1 record for my name, but now it returns all 100 records in the list.
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
Paul
Paul

Hi Paul,
Did you search in the SharePoint list or in SharePoint search center?
Could you provide more details about how you created the custom list?
Please try to enable Server Render as editing the page->Edit Web Part-> Miscellaneous, compare the result.
Please operate in other lists and in other site collections and test whether this issue occurs.
Please start a full crawl in Central Administration -> Manage service application -> Search service application -> Content Sources and test whether this issue occurs.
Could you check if it exists error in ULS log after you failed to search in the SharePoint list.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Context Type Search returning wrong results with "ME" in the SEARCH

CREATE TABLE "TEST"
id NUMBER(19) NOT NULL,
"TESTDATA" CLOB NOT NULL ENABLE
CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT ONLINE
PARAMETERS ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M SYNC(ON COMMIT) section group ctxsys.xmlpathgroup')
PARALLEL 4
insert into test values (1, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
select * from TEST
where
contains(testdata,
'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
This should not result in any results but it does show the record out.
What is it we have to do deal with the word "ME". It works fine for any other values.

Since "me" is a default stopword, searching for "me" and "Victor" is like just searching for "Victor", so it returns the row with "Victor" in it. If you want to be able to search for "me", then you need to either remove "me" from your existing ctxsys.default_stoplist using ctx_ddl.remove_stopword or specify another stoplist during index creation that does not contain me or an empty stoplist. You will need to drop and recreate your index after changing or modifying stoplists in order for the changes to take effect. Please see the demonstration below. I have added a couple of rows so that it is clearer what is and is not returned. You can check the token_text column of your dr$...$i index to see what it is tokenized, indexed, and searchable.
SCOTT@10gXE> -- test environment:
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE TABLE "TEST"
2 (
3 id NUMBER(19) NOT NULL,
4 "TESTDATA" CLOB NOT NULL ENABLE
5 )
6 /
Table created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (1, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>victor</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (2, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>me victor</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (3, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>naren</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> exec ctx_ddl.create_section_group ('xmlpathgroup', 'PATH_SECTION_GROUP')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@10gXE> -- reproduction:
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
2 PARAMETERS
3    ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M
4       SYNC(ON COMMIT)
5       section group xmlpathgroup')
6 PARALLEL 4
7 /
Index created.
SCOTT@10gXE> SELECT token_text FROM dr$ix_testdata$i
2 /
TOKEN_TEXT
FRANDENSTEIN
NAREN
VICTOR
givenname
surname
user
6 rows selected.
SCOTT@10gXE> select * from TEST
2 where
3 contains(testdata,
4 'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
5 /
        ID
TESTDATA
         1
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
         2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>me victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
SCOTT@10gXE> -- solution:
SCOTT@10gXE> drop index ix_testdata
2 /
Index dropped.
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
2 PARAMETERS
3    ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M
4       SYNC(ON COMMIT)
5       section group xmlpathgroup
6       stoplist ctxsys.empty_stoplist')
7 PARALLEL 4
8 /
Index created.
SCOTT@10gXE> SELECT token_text FROM dr$ix_testdata$i
2 /
TOKEN_TEXT
FRANDENSTEIN
ME
NAREN
VICTOR
givenname
surname
user
7 rows selected.
SCOTT@10gXE> select * from TEST
2 where
3 contains(testdata,
4 'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
5 /
        ID
TESTDATA
         2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>me victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
SCOTT@10gXE>

Search-Mailbox Search Query not returning correct results.

Hi,
I'd appreciate some assistance with the search and delete I'm trying to I'm run.
I'm using the following command to find messages with a certain message class received before 01/01/14 in a mailbox.
Get-Mailbox xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Search-Mailbox -SearchQuery '(Received:< 01/01/14) AND ("IPM.Note.Worksite.Ems.Filed")' -EstimateResultOnly | select displayname, success, resultitemscount,Resultitemssize
When I first ran the command it returned 130,000 items, I ran it again with a -DeleteContent switch, all the items were successfully removed from the mailbox, great! However, when I look in the mailbox I can see ~1000 items with the message class in the command
and dated 2013 or earlier, they meet the search criteria so I don't understand why when I run the command again it returns 0 items.
Help!

Hello,
Based on your description, your cmdlet is ok.
When you run the cmdlet with a -DeleteContent switch, the messages are not delete permanently. please try to run the cmdlet with a -DeleteContent switch and -Force switch to check the result.
Besides, please use get-mailboxstatistics | fl cmdlet to check information about mailbox.
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support

Union_all query returns wrong results

I have 6 individual queries that combine together using "union_all". If I run it, it returns 6084 records, see example 1.
Example 1:
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6;
if I do it this way, example2, I get only 3821 records. Is there a bug in Oracle 11g? I select everything from 6084 records, I should get them all, correct?
Example 2:
select * from
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6
note that I use "union_all" because the computer does not take it without the underscore.

user557594 wrote:
Your queries do not deal with thousand of rows. My queries worked ok before the upgrade to 11g. I just want to know if there is a bug related to union all in 11g.If you believe that you are encountering a bug, you really should be posting this over on Metalink (My Oracle Support). When you do, you'll want to specify at a minimum the 4 digit Oracle version you are using (11g could mean either of two major releases and a few different patchsets).
I'm sure if you search My Oracle Support, you'll find at least one bug in whatever version of 11g you're using that occurs when UNION ALL is used (though I'll wager that you need two or three other conditions to be true as well). If you open a ticket, however, Oracle Support can determine whether you are actually encountering an error and/or whether you've encountered any of the published bugs, an unpublished bug, or a new bug. Once you know that, Oracle Support may or may not have a patch for you.
Unfortunately, if you can't post a test case that would allow us to reproduce the problem locally, it's going to be hard for us to provide much assistance. Of course, Oracle Support will also need a reproducible test case, but they can probably help you work through the process of putting one together complete with sample data and a query plan.
Justin

Simple query returns wrong results in Sql 2012

On my Windows 8 box running Sql 2012 11.0.3128, this query returns an IncludeCount of 0 and an ExcludeCount of 1.
On my Windows 7 box running Sql 2008 10.50.2550 this query returns an IncludeCount of 3 and an ExcludeCount of 1, which is correct.
In short, it runs properly on these versions of OS and Sql's:
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.4000
Windows 2012 SP1 + Sql 11.0.3000
Windows 7 + Sql 11.0.2100
And gives incorrect results on these OS's and Sql's (so far, tested):
Windows 8 Enterprise + Sql 11.0.3128
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
I wondered if anyone else can reproduce this? I can't figure out the magic combination of OS and SQL version this breaks on.
In all scenarios, the resulting @filters table is populated correctly, and the [Include] column is properly set to a 1 or a 0, so why aren't the other variables being properly set?
If I change the [ID] column to NONCLUSTERED, it works fine, too. It doesn't matter if @filters is a TVP or a temp table or an actual table, same (incorrect) results in each case.
DECLARE @filters TABLE([ID] bigint PRIMARY KEY, [Include] bit)
DECLARE @excludecount int = 0
DECLARE @includecount int = 0
DECLARE @id bigint
INSERT INTO @filters ([ID])
VALUES (1), (3), (4), (-7)
UPDATE @filters SET
    @id = [ID],
    @includecount = @includecount + (CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
    @excludecount = @excludecount + (CASE WHEN @id < 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
    [Include] = CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
    [ID] = ABS(@id)
SELECT @includecount as IncludeCount, @excludecount as ExcludeCount
SELECT * FROM @filters

What part is undocumented?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177523.aspx
The above link states I can update variables inside an UPDATE statement ...
But it does not say what the correct result of what you are trying to would be. Variable assignment in UPDATE only makes sense if the UPDATE hits one row. If the UPDATE matches several rows, which value you the variable is set to is not defined.
It gets even more complicated when you have the variable on both sides of the expression. But I'd say that the only two values that makes as the final value of @includecount 0. An UPDATE statement, like other DML statements in SQL, is logically defined
as all-at-once. There are no intermediate results. Therefore the only possible values are the initial value of @includecount plus the value of the CASE statement, which always should returns 0, since @id is NULL when the UPDATE statement starts to execute.
I'm afraid that what you have is nonsense from a language perspective, and the result is undefined. Whenever you get different results from a query depending on whether you have certain indexes in place, you know that the query is indeterministic. There
are certainly part of SQL that are indeterministic, for instance ORDER BY on a non-unique columns. But in this particular case you have also wandered out into the land that is also undefined.
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but I can only advice you to go back to the drawing board.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Search UCM service returns wrong results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for