Security issue in Business Rule

Hi All,
I've one user who is provisioned for business rules in shared services. I can see the user in Essbase user list. But when I try to assign the user to a business rule, I don't see that user in the "Add user" pop up box. There are total 121 essbase users and 120 users can be assigned to the business rule except that one. This is quite surprising and I tried lot of options but no result yet.
I'm using system 9.2. And I tried below options:
Deprovision the user and provision him again in shared service.
Ran the security refresh in planning desktop
restart essbase services
Please let me know if you have any idea to correct this issue, Thanks in advance!!

Log into "My Oracle Support" and have a search for doc id 763345.1, read section "Users and rights"
Hopefully it will be useful to you.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

Group Security Issue with Business Rules

Hopefully you experts out there can follow this. We have about 200 users in our Planning application split into 3 categories (Admins, Interactive Users and Planners) via groups setup in Shared services. We also have an email group list setup in Outlook that has all 200 users in it that we use to send out emails to all users regarding the application. So in Shared Services we have the email group list as an assigned group in the Planners group. So as new people are added to the group list in email they are automatically included as a user in the Planning application. People that are Admins or Interactive Users are manually added to those groups in Shared Services. Everything seemed to be working fine until we tried blocking the Planners groups from running certain business rules in the application. We have clusters setup in Essbase to control access to the business rules. I went into the cluster and set the Planners group to cannot validate or launch on certain rules but found that I now could not run the business rules either even though I am an Admin and the Admin group has vaildate and launch privledges in the cluster. I believe the issue has to do with the fact that I am by default in the Planners group because I am in the email group list which is assigned to the Planners group in Shared Services. Other than setting up and managing 3 seperate email group lists and assigning them individually in Shared Services, does anyone know how I can manage business rules security using the 3 groups i have setup? I hope this makes sense. If not I can provide more detail. Thanks.

Have you tried using Business Rules projects? Create a project for the admin Shared Services group and assign all rules to that group. Create a Planning project for planners and assign only rules that you want them to run. Any rule that planners should not have access to would be removed from the Planner business rules project, but still in the admin project for you to run.

Security removed from business rules

Hi,
The business rules for an application stopped working with an error it could not be validated against the database. I looked on this thread
Error validating business rule
The security was no longer present. The business rules had not been imported. I added it back in and things started working. I would like to know why the security was lost as I have not seen this before.
Thanks,
Nathan

Has it only every happened once and on one rule? If so I am not sure if you will get a definitive answer to why the rule has no security.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Small issue in Business Rules

Dear All
i have a Business Rule callingin BPEL Process based on below XSD file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1256" ?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://www.bank.com/bankbpel"
targetNamespace="http://www.bank.com/bankbpel"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xsd:complexType name="Client-BR-Input-Type">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="Status" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="is-VIP" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="Start-Date" type="xsd:date"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:element name="Degree" type="Degree-Type"/>
<xsd:element name="Client-BR-Input" type="Client-BR-Input-Type"/>
<xsd:complexType name="Degree-Type">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="Degree" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>
after finishing my rules and decisions, i dropped Business Rule inside BPEL and start to copy values in input parameters of Business Rule, but i face *"Exception - Problem Building Schema !" !!*
and sure my problem now in XSD file, please advise why and how to avoid ? ..

Dear All
Resolved, it is a small issue as i expected, i forget to update in/out variables to map for elements in XSD file like below ..
<variables>
<variable name="dsIn"
element="client:Client-BR-Input"/>
<variable name="dsOut"
element="client:Degree"/>
</variables>
thanks

Issue with business rule. Failed because the fact have not been found .

Hello
I'm trying to execute a business rule inside my process to evaluate a service output. I've been created the rules and have used before succesfully. I got a desicion table which evaluate the entry params and in the actions I've made a new Assert to create and return an instance of en.abis.ns.biasxsd.BIASFaultDetail. Sometimes it works perfectly and in other moments fails.
I got the following exception. I'm so sorry about the spanish but this is the language the server uses.
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><operationErroredFault xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/brValidateQualityScore/brValidateQualityScore_brValidateQualityScore_DecisionService"><part name="payload"><errorInfo xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/brValidateQualityScore/brValidateQualityScore_brValidateQualityScore_DecisionService"><errorMessage>Error al ejecutar una unidad de trabajo de sesión de reglas, no se ha encontrado el hecho. La sesión de reglas 510027 ha fallado porque no se ha encontrado el hecho ki.abis.ns.biasxsd.BIASFaultDetail o no existe. Compruebe la excepción subyacente y corrija el error. Póngase en contacto con los Servicios de Soporte Oracle si no se puede corregir el error. 510027</errorMessage></errorInfo></part></operationErroredFault></bpelFault>To avoid language problems the error in English is somethiong like this:
Failed to perform a unit work of session rules, not found the fact. The rule session 210027 failed because the fact have not been found ki.abis.ns.biasxsd.BIASFaultDetail, or does not exits. Check the underlying exception and correct the error. Contact Oracle Support Services if you can not correct the error
Regards,
isabelbernely

Have you check if this Variable exist?
Regards
Amarnath
http://amarnath-essbase-blog.blogspot.com

Issue on Business Rules in SOA

Hello
I am writing a business rule as per the screen shot and in one scenario it is firing twice even though i selected 'there is a case where' option.
My requirement was if pem >0 or tool name is 'PEM' then add PEM. It is firing twice in case if pem >0 and tool name is 'PEM' (both fullfilled). Can anybody help me on this please?
Thanks!

Don't know much about SOA Composer (sorry - you've hit the BPM forum), but you should be able to see the business rules from the Oracle BPM Composer. If you've installed BPM, go to http://xx:####/bpm/composer and you'll see business rules after poking around a little. Let me know if you need more help finding them.
Dan

Issue in business rules attahed with forms (11.1.2.2.300)

We have attached Business rules with relavent forms but when we run business rule from form some other rule is run instead.

Hi Bilal,
So the Sales_Value rule runs regardless of what rule you attach to the form?
How are you running the rule? Run on Save, or through a right click menu? Just by clicking the rule on the left?
Can you confirm that:
In the Administer Forms and Ad Hoc Grids screen, the "Production_Quantity" rule id definitely attached and that in the Properties tab, you have the correct box ticked for that rule (e.g. Run on Save etc).
Can you also make sure that the "Sales_Value" rule is NOT present in the form in the same screen?
Do you get the same results when you run via Smart View?
Have you deployed the application since you changed the form/Added the rule to the Form?

Business Rule RTP issue

Hello,
Currently I am seeing end users intermittently having issues on Business Rules. THe problem is that the description/prompt strings do not display when a user launches a rule. This seems to occur in both SmartView and IE8.
Has anyone experienced this sort of issue before ?
Cheers
Chris

I had some weird issues where the pop-up wasn't actually being displayed on the monitor, but it was opening (I think it was actually on 11.1.1.3). We found this out by someone experiencing the problem, and then adding a second monitor for another purpose and the box would show up on the second monitor. We ended up deleting the Excel items in the registry, and when Excel is reopened it rebuilt them and the popup worked, another option would have been to add a second monitor temporarily to move it back to the main monitor.
Regards
JTF

Performance issues while opening business rule

Hi,
we're working with Hyperion version 9.2.1 and we're having some performance problems while opening business rules. I analyzed the issue and found out that it has something to do with assigning access privileges to the rule.
The authorization plan looks as followed:
User A is assigned to group G1
User B is assigned to group G2
Group G1 ist assigned to Group XYZ
Group G2 ist assigned to Group XYZ
Group XYZ holds the provision "basic user" for the planning application.
Without assigning any access priviliege the business rule opens immediately.
By assigning access privilege to group G1/G2 (validate or launch) the business rule opens immediately.
By assigning access privilege to group XYZ the business rule opens after 2-5 minutes.
Has anyone an idea why this happens and how to solve this?
Kind regards
Uli
Edited by: user13110201 on 12.05.2010 04:31

This has been an issue with Business Rules for quite awhile. Oracle has made steps both forward and backward in later releases than yours; and they've issued patches addressing, if not completely resolving, the problem. Things finally seem to be much better in 11.1.1.3, although YMMV.

Business rules from epma to planning

Hi,
In EPMA version 11.1.12 I am having an issue with business rules. I wrote and deployed a business rule from EPMA to planning and everything was fine, the rule ran on save in the data form.
Now, I tried to run the rule a few days later and it won't run. I tried to remove and re-add the rule, but now its not visible. In planning, I can't see 'business rule security' in the administration drop down.
I deployed the application and all the rules and everything is successful, but still nothing in planning. In another application the rules are there.
How could a business rule disappear from planning and not show up again when it was deployed? Any help is appreciated. Thanks,
Dq

We sometimes see similar issues when the services are recycled in the wrong order. Perhaps a service failed or was restarted (after you had been successful in running the business rule from Planning)?
- Jake

Business Rules error when creating new classic planning application in 9.3.

Im trying to create a new planning application using classis planning application wizard in Workspace. everything seems alright untill i gets an error saying "Business rules cant connect to Planning"
other than this Business rules working fine and i can open business rules in other applications and i can access business rules repository in EAS.
Any thoughts on this ?

Further invesitgation bears this problem out.
Oracle support recommend wrapping the SimpleType in a ComplexType. This does work, but now I have an extra wrapper element to deal with. I either have to use the wrapped type in my other complex, composed Types and/or add an external wrapping element when trying to create Business Services in BPM to call the BusinessRules I've created.
This is a bit messy.
To be clear, this does not seem to be an issue with Business Rules; the BR editor and generation of Facts (including simple restricted types -> JAXB 2.0/Java Enumerations) seems to work correctly. There seems to be an issue exposing DFs as Services. The code which generated the WSDL and its supporting types seems to choke on restricted SimpleTypes.
As a side note, it seems that HumanTasks have a similar limitation
Edited by: wylderbeast on May 31, 2011 3:27 PM

In Business Rule child elements of Unbounded element are not visible.

Hi All,
Jdev version 11.1.1.7.0
I am facing one issue in Business Rule...
Scenario: I am creating Approval Service (BPEL) with Human Work flow and Bunises Rule.
I am assingning participant in HW by using Rule based(Connecting HW and BR).
Problem here is:
Shema has "unbounded" element.
<element name="ExpenseItem" maxOccurs="unbounded">
     <complexType>
      <sequence>
       <element name="ItemID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemName" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemPrpjectID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemStatus" type="string"/>
      </sequence>
     </complexType>
    </element>
Whenever I create Busines rules to configure rules.
While configuring rules child elements of ExpenseItem are not visible. But those are neccesary to configure rules.
If you can help to me resolve would help.
Is it a bedault behaviour of BR? If so how can i acheive this?
Thanks,
Santosh

Solution found:
Click on RuleSet which you have created.
Expand Rule inside it.
Enable Advanced mode and Tree mode and click OK.
Select Root as Task and click on insert pattren and create pattren which is based on unbounded element (here its meant as fact)
Once you create pattren , will be able access elements under unbounded element for Business rule configuration.

Business Rules Error when Decision Function surfaced as WebService in BPM

To use a BusinessRule as from a Business Rules activity,it needs to be surfaced as a WebService.
I've run into an issue where as soon as I check that box and save, the BusinessRule in question goes into a error mode when viewed from the BPM Project Manager (which is why this question is posted here).
The scenario is this:
My types are defiend in XSD. There is a SimpleType - FooStepTypeType - which is a retricted xs:string, the common way top create an enumeration. I import this as an XML fact, it creates a Enum bucketset, which is perfect. I create a decision function - DecisionFunction1 - which has an input parameter of this type and a boolean output. I set up a simple decision table to use the input and assert the output. The editor is happy.
At this point, I can't use the DF in my process, as it's not exposed a service, and won't be selectable via the the Properties/Implementation of a Business Rules activity.
A soon as I mark the DF as a WebService and save it, an the rule disappears from the Rules section of the Business Catalog and reappears at the root of the catalog in error. In some cases it can't be edited.
Hovering over the error file produced this error message:
The argument ‘step’ of decision function ‘DecisionFunction1’ could not build because of ‘BPM-71517: Unable to identify the parameter QName. Cause: ‘FooStepTypeType. Action: Make sure that the decision function parameter is of XML type and exactly one XML Schema Element exists that represents the parameter’.
My XSD previously did not contain a freestanding element of this type, but had elements defined in another complex type of this type. Adding a freestanding element didn't change anything. In fact it seems that elements are not avaialble to be imported as XMLFacts, only types.
At this point, if the Rules editor is still open, the DF can be "unserviced" and after saving may be recoverable with a JDev restart. If not, manually removing the DF from the .rules xml file can help recover the file so that it can be edited again.
SO: THE QUESTIONS.
Why can't I use a simpleType as an input parameter for a DF exposed as a WebService? What is BPM-71517 asking me to do exactly? I can't find any references to it via searching. Why does eveything seem fine until I expose it?
Addendum - using JDev 11.1.1.4.0 with BPM tools 11.1.1.4.0.5682
Addendum2 - upgraded to 11.1.1.5.0 and the problem is still there.....
TIA,
Bill
Edited by: wylderbeast on May 20, 2011 9:38 AM
Edited by: wylderbeast on May 20, 2011 10:09 AM
Edited by: wylderbeast on May 31, 2011 3:22 PM

Further invesitgation bears this problem out.
Oracle support recommend wrapping the SimpleType in a ComplexType. This does work, but now I have an extra wrapper element to deal with. I either have to use the wrapped type in my other complex, composed Types and/or add an external wrapping element when trying to create Business Services in BPM to call the BusinessRules I've created.
This is a bit messy.
To be clear, this does not seem to be an issue with Business Rules; the BR editor and generation of Facts (including simple restricted types -> JAXB 2.0/Java Enumerations) seems to work correctly. There seems to be an issue exposing DFs as Services. The code which generated the WSDL and its supporting types seems to choke on restricted SimpleTypes.
As a side note, it seems that HumanTasks have a similar limitation
Edited by: wylderbeast on May 31, 2011 3:27 PM

Business rule problem with association

Hi,
i am facing an issue with business rules am not able to associate with planning outline in AAS console
Ram

Hi Ram,
Navigate to
1. C:\Hyperion\AnalyticAdministrationServices\storage\easusers\users.xml
2. Edit users.xml file
3. Update admin to "true" and save file.
4. For example,
EASUsers><EASUser directory="admin" email="[[email protected]]" external="true" fullName="EAS Administrator" id="1" isMigrated="false" password="A627FC9A6DEA834C1FA7772..........." roles="roles" supervisor="true" username="admin"/>
This should help you
5. After this, you restart RMI, AAS and planning services.
6. Now, it should work
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Job status of Business Rules not reflecting correctly in Hyperion Planning

Hi,
In our Planning Web Application version 11.1.2.1 (Classic application), we have issue with the Business Rules not changing the job status from Processing to Complete.
Essentially giving an indication to users that the job is taking longer than expected.
Having noticed that behavior, when we cross check with Admin credentials (Application Logs ) HBR Launch.log. The End Time of the job is updated promptly.
We have couple of SRs Open with Oracle but they concluded it’s a bug and need to upgrade to 11.1.2.2. But currently we do not have any plans to upgrade to the latest version.
In order to force the Status change to mark it as Complete at the SQL Server backend.
We have to update the status table HYP_JOB_STATUS manually via database update.
But this is laborious process.
Did anyone encounter such issue? Please suggest a feasible option here ?
Thanks,
Venkat
Edited by: 947686 on Dec 18, 2012 6:21 AM

Hello Shiva,
We do not have any issue with calc rules; we are facing this issue with Business rules.
We have looked into the logs in both Applcation logs and Essbase logs nothing found strange except couple of .xcp files were generated in Essbase server. We have sent those .xcp files to Oracle for investigation. We have also noticed that Web Logic server was not hand shaking properly with Hyperion Server. Oracle responded with few application settings which we are already sycn with recommended settings.
We had the same issue in 8 months back and the same repeated now.
Thanks,
Venkat

Security issue in Business Rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for