Security Update for Flash Video

The Security Update for Dreamweaver CS3 from downloads
APSB08-01.zip does not have the correct date. The Security Bulletin
says to verify the creation date of the file Adobe Dreamweaver
CS3\configuration\Templates\Video_Player. The date should be
January 15, 2008 according to the Bulletin.
I have gone through the procedure three times and still end
up with the wrong date. Is the bulletin wrong? Would a January 9,
2008 date be correct? If not, I desperately need help to resolve
this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Pat

I've noticed this too. Just had to do a fresh install of
Vista, after installing DW CS3 I downloaded the Flash player
security update by following
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-01.html?trackingid=BUCMS&pss=dw_9.0 _win_en_full___20040226
to
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb402925&sliceId=2
When extracted, the files contained within APSB08-01.zip have
a date of January 1, 2008; however the text indicates the date of
extracted files should be January 15, 2008.
Would it not make more sense for this update to simply be
included as other updates within the Adobe Updater?
As the poster above me, Secunia is also reporting these files
as insecure even after downloaded from the above links and
applied.

Similar Messages

  • Security update for flash player....did it install?

    Yesterday on dec 16, I had a window pop up on my comp telling me that there is some security update for flash player so I clicked install and it was connecting and everything...then I allowed Adobe systems incorportated permission and all that stuff which was normal....then the adobe helper stopped working and I got a message saying that it will have to close the program......now I don't know...did the updates install or not...what were the security updates so I can check...any advice?

    Hi, well DLM is Download Manager and sometimes it is used to D/L FP. It is supposed to disconnect after FP is downloaded. Go to Add/Remove, you should see Flash Player 10 ActiveX listed. If the Adobe Download Manager or DLM is listed Remove it from there and reboot. It is not supposed to be there after it serves it purpose.
    The version is 10.0.42.34, I hope you just made a typo:-)
    Also, if you are using IE, go to Tools>Manage add ons and look to see if you have listed Shockwave Flash Object......
    ActiveX......Flash10d.ocx and that it is Enabled.  Be sure to check in "currently loaded" and "have been used".
    In Firefox you would look in extenstions, add ons or plug-ins, look for SWF.
    In order for FP to operate properly, you need the ActiveX in IE and the SWF plug-in in FF.
    Thanks 

  • Regarding security update for Flash Player 9 (Flash Player 9,0,124,0)

    We are facing issue in STOMP client because of newly
    implemented restriction on flash player.(
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/flash_player9_security_update.html).
    Because of this, Our STOMP client is not able to get messages
    from activemq.
    We have tried to add socket meta files as discussed in others
    article but we were not able to get solutions.
    We have done below stuffs.
    1) Added LoadPolicy code in stompclient for getting
    policyfile from server running on 80 port.
    2) Also set xmlSocket as load policy to get connection from
    stompclient to Activemq.
    1) PolicyFile.xml(loading this also in STOMPClient.swf)
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM
    "/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
    <!-- Policy file for xmlsocket://socks.example.com -->
    <cross-domain-policy>
    <!-- This is a master-policy file -->
    <site-control
    permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    <!-- Instead of setting to-ports="*",
    administrators can use ranges and commas -->
    <!-- This will allow access to ports 123, 456, 457, and
    458 -->
    <allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="*" />
    </cross-domain-policy>
    2) Flash players logs(using debug version of Flash player)
    Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613
    by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
    OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
    to authorize data loading from resource at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Policy file accepted:
    http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
    Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 (at 3
    seconds) while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
    cause any problems, but see
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    for an explanation.
    Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613
    by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://mail.google.com/a/sigmainfo.net/im/sound.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://mail.google.com/a/sigmainfo.net/im/sound.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
    OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
    to authorize data loading from resource at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Policy file accepted:
    http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
    OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
    to authorize data loading from resource at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Policy file accepted:
    http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
    OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
    to authorize data loading from resource at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
    http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Policy file accepted:
    http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
    Warning: Ignoring <site-control> tag in policy file
    from
    http://192.168.1.12:843/policyfile.xml.
    This tag is only allowed in master policy files.
    Warning: Domain 192.168.1.12 does not specify a meta-policy.
    Applying default meta-policy 'all'. This configuration is
    deprecated. See
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    to fix this problem.
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
    http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
    OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
    to authorize data loading from resource at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613 by requestor from
    http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    Warning: [strict] Ignoring policy file at
    xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:843 due to incorrect syntax. See
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    to fix this problem.
    Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613 (at 3
    seconds) while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
    cause any problems, but see
    http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
    for an explanation.
    Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613
    by requestor from
    http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
    is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
    3) Setting below load policy files in stompclient.mxml
    flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("
    http://" + server + "/crossdomain.xml");
    //flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("
    http://" + server + "/policyfile.xml");
    flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("xmlsocket://" + server
    + ":"+port);
    4) we have also changed crossdomain.xml (this is using Schema
    instead of DTD as <site-control > is not there in DTD)
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <cross-domain-policy xmlns:xsi="
    http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="
    http://www.adobe.com/xml/schemas/PolicyFile.xsd">
    <allow-access-from domain="*" />
    <site-control
    permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    </cross-domain-policy>

    You're welcome!
    Flash is still the same CPU hog... Good that there's [ClickToFlash|http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash>!

  • Security updates for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux?

    When attempting to download an update for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux, I saw the note saying that there would be no new development, but security backfixes would continue to be released. I've seen the security warnings for months on my Linux install in Firefox (which is updated) but there does not seem to be a security patch that would stop these "Allow - Continue Blocking" warnings for Flash Player.
    When can we expect these to be completed? Linux users may not comprise a large portion of your user base, but the alternatives are extremely expensive hardware and/or software if you want to use an Apple or Microsoft product.

    I chose "Yum for Linux" and the file that was downloaded was:
    adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
    I see now that if I select the "rpm for Other Linux" it downloads the flash-player rpm complete with the version info, so perhaps the Yum version is a wrapper. I assumed that since Fedora (and Redhat/etc) uses yum, that I should download the YUM version... in order for it to take effect, I had to perform the following commands after downloading the above rpm:
    sudo yum remove adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch
    sudo yum localinstall adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
    sudo rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux
    sudo yum -y install flash-plugin
    That allowed me to get the newer version of Flash player to show (and no longer receive the security warnings) but it seems if I had used the Other for Linux download that I wouldn't have had to take those extra steps. I guess we'll find out when the next security update to flash player is released.
    Thanks,
    -Tim

  • How do I keep my macbook secure since Apple is not longer providing security updates for Mac OS X 10.5?

    I just found out that Apple is no longer providing security updates on Mac OS X 10.5. What can I do to keep my comupter safe? I bought my laptop in Sept. '08 and I am not inclined to fork over a couple of thousand dollars when I have a perfectly functioning laptop. Any advise out there? Thnx

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    Here's a 100% effective (though not necessarily practical) solution:
    Never connect your computer to the internet, never insert a disc or flash drive from anyone else, never purchase any new software, and use the computer to write and print only actual letters, never connect to email.
    Your computer will continue to function as it does now until it wears out, without being vulnerable to any new security threats out there, and will continue to work just fine on OS X 10.5 without any future security measures.
    On a side note, I have a 16-year-old car I spent thousands of dollars to purchase new, but I've been driving it on the metal rims for a while now, because I'm not inclined to fork over money for tires, when I have an otherwise perfectly functioning car.
    Then there are alternatives that cost money:
    Purchase and install an antivirus program and keep it updated.
    Upgrade your computer memory and hard disk if necessary so you can install OS X 10.6 'Snow Leopard', or OS X 10.7 'Lion'  Snow Leopard is still supported by Apple for the moment, but support and security updates for 10.6 will likely be discontinued soon after OS X 10.8 'Mountain Lion' ships later this year.
    Even though we want computers to be assets that retain or increase in value over time, the economic reality is that computers are best thought of as commodities and/or consumables that depreciate, become obsolete, and wear out, like cars, tires, and batteries. A restored 1965 Mustang Convertible, and a 2012 Mustang Convertible probably cost about the same. Which one is much safer, much faster, rides much better, and gets much better fuel mileage?
    Your computer WILL be worth less five years after you purchase it than the day you bought it. The mechanical parts (hard disk) will eventually wear out. The microprocessor inside yours operates at perhaps 1/4th the maximum speed of the slowest current model. The latest video chipsets provide huge performance gains over 2008 technology. But if your current computer truly meets all your needs, then indeed there is no reason to update or upgrade.
    If you're using your computer in business, a 2008 model is fully depreciated in 5 years (this year) and it's time to consider a new purchase.  In the US, IRS Publication 946 will get you started: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p946.pdf

  • Chrome Plug-in update for Flash does not work

    I am a Mac OS X 10.5.8 user and I use Chrome as my standard browser. I updated the Flash Player to version 10.3.183.23 2 times now and it is still not working and showing me that I have an old version. Every time I try to update the Plug-in it installs it and then everything stays the same when I restart Chrome. Could you help me out here?

    Hi folks,
    I hope you guys know that Mac OS 10.5.x have been officially dropped to support by Apple(as OS vendor) and Google(as browser vendor) while ago. So this behavior sound intentional by Chrome as same behavior as recent Safari. I tried searching around and found this  post at Google site:
    http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2599452
    http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chrome/Y_s0YY2wQkQ
    During above forum discussion there is one user who found own solution with his/her own risk:
    https://productforums.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!category-topic/chrome/mac/_CnkF0tj6xk %5B1-25%5D
    It's up to you if you want to try it out but please understand that the environment is at risk of security matters since all OS, browser, and plugin software do NOT provide security update for you.
    thanks,
    Hitomi

  • Is Using the Automatic Update for Flash Player Safe? It is Installed In System Preferences On My Mac

    Hello-
    One day I noticed that there was an icon on my MacBook Pro of Adobe Flash on the last row of system Preferences.  I had never seen it before, and I had ben using Flash for a long time and updating it regularly.
    It recently told me there is a newer version.  I did not let it install it because I am having so many problems with viewing Flash Videos on websites.  I have a MacBook Pro, Mac OS X 10.6.8.  I use Safari 5.1.5, the latest as far as I know.
    In using this automatic updater for Flash (there are actually several tabs when I click the Adobe icon not just the updater) in the Advanced tab of the Flash Player icon are there any special things I should do if I click yes update?  should I close all the windows, apps, Safari?  do a restart?  I am debating if I should do a Clean Install, wipe all Flash Player off the Mac and just install the latest version rather then letting the updater install the latest version, which I think is 11.2.202.228.  I currently have 11.1.102.64 with a bunch of video issues.
    Thanks for any assistance.

    Replied via PM

  • Are there critical or security updates for Macromedia Dreamweaver since Adobe took over?

    Are there critical or security updates for Macromedia Dreamweaver Flash and Macromedia suite since Adobe took over? I can still use it but I am worried about security issues.

    corpow wrote:
    I have a new computer with Windows 7 and I thought of installing my old Macromedia Dreamweaver and using it to update my web site. However I don't know if I can still use it with Windows 7 and with no critical updates I am wondering what would happen.
    Or if I reformat my old Windows XP computer  and reinstall Macromedia Dreamweaver, would it be okay, or safe, security wise? Thanks.
    What sort of security are you worried about?  DW creates plain text files and they are as safe as any other text files you create with Notepad or Wordpad.
    How old is your DW?  I personally thing#k that it is time for you to get a new version so that you can create websites based on modern standards that are compatible with modern browsers.
    Amazon should be able to sell you the product at a very competitive price.
    Good luck.

  • Does Adobe still release updates for Flash Player 10?

    Our users are currently on XP and are using Adobe Flash Player 10.3.183.18.
    Does Adobe still release updates for version 10 or do we have to go to 11 to be up to date security-wise?

    The latest update for Flash Player 10.x is 10.3.183.20; you can obtain the installers from http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html
    [topic moved to Flash Player forum]

  • New 9.0.2 update for Flash CS3 Professional

    I just ran the new Flash CS3 Professional update via the
    Adobe Updater. Everything ran and reported the update was
    successfully completed. However Flash still says it's 9.0.0.494 in
    the Finder and when choosing About Flash from the program it says
    9.0. Just wondering if the update really happened or not.

    Bentley: There is a downloadable update available NOW. And
    based on what you say the language is confusing.
    12/12/2007 Adobe Flash CS3 Professional (9.0.2) delivers
    support for the latest update of Adobe Flash Player 9. This update
    includes a new Video Playback component supporting H.264, support
    for Flash Lite 3 Update for Flash CS3 Professional, and all Debug
    and Release versions of this new Adobe Flash Player. For users of
    Flash CS3 Professional, this update will also be available via
    Adobe Update Manager in Flash CS3 Professional.
    It states "Adobe Flash CS3 Professional (9.0.2)". You should
    change that, as it does not appear to be the case. The language
    definitely implies that the program itself will be updated to
    9.0.2.

  • Why ship Google Chrome with security updates to Flash Player

    I do not want it, I will not install it, it wastes time downloading. Stop sending it to me.

    I remember the European Competition authorities made a judgement against Microsoft for only shipping Internet Explorer with Windows. How can you only ship the Chrome option with Adobe updates, why do you not give users the option to download other browsers?
    Regards
    Chris Fearn
    Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:32:33 -0700
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Why ship Google Chrome with security updates to Flash Player
        Re: Why ship Google Chrome with security updates to Flash Player
        created by Chris Campbell in Installing Flash Player - View the full discussion
    I understand.  If you remember in the future, please uncheck the "opt out" checkbox before initiating the installer download.  http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-4836417-253139/450-316/11-9-20 126-31-29PM.png
         Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4836417#4836417
         Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4836417#4836417
         To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4836417#4836417. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
         Start a new discussion in Installing Flash Player by email or at Adobe Community
      For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • After updating latest security update for my OSX 10.7.5 one of my usb port is not working now.how do i know what is cause that usb port is not working after security update

    one of usb port in my macbook pro havent work after i ve updated latest security update for osx 10.7.5, how do i know what is cause that usb port is good or bad

    On a Mac running v10.7.2, the only way to reinstall Safari is to reinstall OS X using OS X Recovery.
    Safari 5.1.1 is for Snow Leopard. It will not run on a Mac with v10.7 installed.

  • Release notes for december 2013 update for Flash Pro CC

    Hello Adobe.
    Where are the release notes for the december 2013 update for Flash Pro CC? I just found this http://helpx.adobe.com/flash/release-note/release-notes-flash-pro-cc.html with just "contains critical bug fixes". What are they? Do i need them? Are they my submissions so that you don't want to tell other people?

    HI infeter,
    The following fixes have been done in the December update - #13.1.0.226
    1) Fix for Multi-line Errors are not being reported in Flash to Flash Builder workflow
    2) AIR for Android UI dialog: Shared runtime and emulator deployment options under Deployment section gets enabled on adding AIR4.0 SDK. This should not be enabled since we dont support shared runtime from AIR 3.9 onwards.
    Also certain null checks were added to fix crashes based on crashes logs that were reported.
    Thanks
    -Sujai

  • System exception running Configuration Wizard after installing several security updates for SP

    Greetings,
    Have a 2 server farm, SharePoint 2013 SP1, SQL and SharePoint. Windows Update has 15 updates downloaded and ready to install, 2 Server 2012 updates and 2 SharePoint updates, 11 Security Updates for SharePoint. So, I said yeah, go ahead and install them late
    last night when I figured it wouldn't interrupt folks. (dumb move)
    Windows Update took awhile, but no errors during the install. Rebooted the server as required. Once the server was back, jumped onto the server console and ran the Configuration Wizard to apply the updates to SharePoint. No problem, progressed through the
    screens saying it was going to update, farm and sql information, etc. Config Wizard was going through the steps, then failed with the message: "Failed to register SharePoint services." and here's a link to the configuration log so have a jolly time
    tracking it down, thank you very much.
    I found the error in the log (down about 10,000 lines):
    04/10/2015 03:00:02 12 ERR Task services has failed with an unknown exception
    04/10/2015 03:00:02 12 ERR Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: <nativehr>0x80131904</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetListsWithCallback(String bstrUrl, Guid foreignWebId, String bstrListInternalName, Int32 dwBaseType, Int32 dwBaseTypeAlt, Int32 dwServerTemplate, UInt32 dwGetListFlags, UInt32 dwListFilterFlags, Boolean bPrefetchMetaData, Boolean bSecurityTrimmed, Boolean bGetSecurityData, Boolean bPrefetchRelatedFields, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32& plRecycleBinCount)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetListsWithCallback(String bstrUrl, Guid foreignWebId, String bstrListInternalName, Int32 dwBaseType, Int32 dwBaseTypeAlt, Int32 dwServerTemplate, UInt32 dwGetListFlags, UInt32 dwListFilterFlags, Boolean bPrefetchMetaData, Boolean bSecurityTrimmed, Boolean bGetSecurityData, Boolean bPrefetchRelatedFields, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32& plRecycleBinCount)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetListsWithCallback(String bstrUrl, Guid foreignWebId, String bstrListInternalName, Int32 dwBaseType, Int32 dwBaseTypeAlt, Int32 dwServerTemplate, UInt32 dwGetListFlags, UInt32 dwListFilterFlags, Boolean bPrefetchMetaData, Boolean bSecurityTrimmed, Boolean bGetSecurityData, Boolean bPrefetchRelatedFields, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32& plRecycleBinCount)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListCollection.EnsureListsData(Guid webId, String strListName)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListCollection.get_Count()
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAdministrationWebApplication.get_HealthRules()
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Health.SPHealthAnalyzer.RegisterRules(Assembly assembly)
    at Microsoft.Office.InfoPath.Server.Util.HealthAnalyzerRegistration.RegisterHealthRules()
    at Microsoft.Office.InfoPath.Server.Administration.FormsService.Update()
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.PostSetupConfiguration.ServicesTask.InstallServiceInConfigDB(Boolean provisionTheServiceToo, String serviceRegistryKeyName)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.PostSetupConfiguration.ServicesTask.InstallServices(Boolean provisionTheServicesToo)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.PostSetupConfiguration.ServicesTask.Run()
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.PostSetupConfiguration.TaskThread.ExecuteTask()
    So I've been searching around trying to find a clue about this. I tried using PSConfig as well, no dice. I tried using my admin account, the farm account, and the initial setup account, no dice. So I gave in about 3:00 AM and took a break, rather than have
    my head hit the keyboard. Left IIS down and SP down. Had some help this morning when someone started things back up for me. sigh. So the users have been in on the sites and doing all sorts of important and critical things, so rolling back to the last
    backup is the last, last resort. (Fortunately, I did do a manual backup using a PowerShell script before starting all this.)
    Help. Please.
    The actual sites are up and seem to be working fine. Central Admin is down though, get a 500 Internal Server Error in the browser, so things aren't correct. Duh. The config wizard didn't finish.
    Thanks much,
    Steven

    0x80131904 translates to COR_E_SqlException. Typically this will be an MDF/LDF file out of space, or the volume that those files reside on being out of space. Check that first, then also check the SQLERROR log file for any issues.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Best export for flash video

    I have completed an edit of a 7 minute teaser for a feature film and need to export it to be displayed online in a flash player. The footage is HD 1080i, 29.97fps and edited in the Animation coded. My experience with best exports for flash conversion is very limited so please bare with with.
    1) Is it possible to export directly from FCP to a flash file? If yes, would that be a good idea, or should I use third party softwares for better results?
    2) Which third party softwares are recommended for flash conversion? And what export compression should I use in FCP for best flash conversion results?
    3) Any other tips and tricks to get the best quality for flash video display?
    Any help would obviously be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    When I have quality HD video that I want to export for flash, I compress it with h.264 codec. Then, with the new version of Flash, you can swap out the .mp4 extension for .f4v and your good to go in Flash. Quality looks pretty good at a fraction of the file size.

Maybe you are looking for