Seeing Raw on Import

Is there a way that when first importing from the camera raw files, to see the image in the Import mode, rather than "No preview available"?
This is when first starting the Import process.
All.jpg files do have the image displayed so you can see what it is.
Lightroom 3.5
Win 7 64-bit.
Thanks,
Steve 5115

hsbn wrote:
I dont' know about other camera, but with Canon DSLR, you have to use card reader in order to view thumb preview on import. If you plug the camera directly to computer, for some reason, LR cannot render the preview.
This is not true with my 5DMkII. I can see previews on both Raws and JPEGs.
Beat
Message was edited by: b_gossweiler

Similar Messages

  • Can't See RAW Previews Import Direct From Camera

    v. 1.4.1
    Hi. I tried to import RAWs directly from a Canon XTi to LR 1.4.1 and couldn't see the images in the preview window. Is there a way to fix that? Thanks.

    Hi Jay,
    I wasn't really concerned about the speed. I rarely read more than one card (400 10MP RAW images) at a time. But will a card reader allow me to see the previews?

  • RAW+JPEG Import Question

    I switched from Windows/LR to Mac/Aperture last year and have a question about importing RAW and JPEG files.
    My camera (Olympus EM5) finally has RAW support and I have been shooting RAW+JPEG. I got a preset that I like to apply to the RAW files during the import. But I don't want the preset applied to the JPEG files. What I have been doing is importing the RAW and JPEG separately.
    Is there a way to import them all together and have the preset only applied to the RAW files on import? Thanks.

    What import settings have you tried? What configuration do you want the library to have (Both RAW + JPGs as separate masters or only one of them as master?).
    If you want the RAW as master try importing as Both (RAW as master) to see if the preset is only applied to the RAW.
    If you want both as masters, that is you're importing Both (Separate masters) then I don;t believe it will be possible to restrict the preset to just the RAWs on import. But instead of importing the images in two separate batches it might be easier to import both and to apply the preset after import using Metadata->Batch Change. It would be easy to filter just the RAW images to apply the preset to.

  • Raw+Jpeg import shows 2 files

    I have run into an issue when importing photos from my IPad.  When I am working from remote I import my images to my IPad using the connection kit and then import them when I return to work on them in Aperture.  Since upgrading to Mountain Lion and Aperture 3.3.2, the files are no longer attached to each other and show as separate images.  This is creating 2 images for every RAW+Jpeg file I import.  Is there a way to get Aperture to join the two images back together?  Is anyone else running into this issue?

    Did you check your RAW+JPEG import setting? (see below) It sounds like yours was set to Both (Separate Originals). Set it to one of the first two to have them joined.
    I don't know of a way to join them after import (nor separate them either).

  • RAW + JPEG Import Settings Confusion

    I recently bought a new camera which allows me to shoot in RAW and RAW+JPEG mode. I have at present set it to the latter, partially to be safe, and also for allowing quick image loading when out and about and can quickly upload the JPEG files to my ipad.
    But having just purchased Aperture 3, I am really confused over the RAW+Separate import brick's choices.
    I really cannot work out which is the best option,
    Both (Raw as Master),
    Both (JPEG As Master),
    Both (Separate Masters)  or
    Just RAW.
    I have been reading  a book  called "Aperture 3 Portable Genius, but to be honest, it has only made things even more confusing!
    Can someone please advise which are the best settings to use, and under what circumstances I would use the particular setting.
    Thanks :-)

    "best settings to use" is hard to answer, since it depends what kind of photography you're doing and how you like to work.
    It might be useful to understand that if you import 'jpeg as master' aperture treats the jpeg/master pair as one entity. When you edit the photo in AP you'll be editing the jpeg. If you want to get to the RAW, you'll have to choose "Set Raw as Master". Vice-Versa if you import 'raw as master'.
    If you import 'both (separate masters)' you'll see both jpeg and raw in AP as 2 separate files which can be edited separately.  I've never actually used this option, so I could be wrong about that.
    I guess the first thing to decide is which format you most want to work with in Aperture. If you only want to work with RAW in AP, then choose 'RAW files only'. In this scenario the only reason you're shooting raw+jpeg is for the quick upload to iPad.
    Maybe it would help if I explain how/why I use pairs. I shoot a lot of architectural interiors and most of the time I work closely with an art director who needs to see what the shots are looking like as the session proceeds. I shoot raw+jpeg for this and send the jpegs to my laptop over wi-fi for review. This is the *only* reason I'm shooting pairs, as the tiny jpeg makes the journey so much quicker than the large raw and is of sufficient quality for the purpose. I have the camera set to produce the smallest jpeg possible for fastest transfer.
    Back at base I'll import the raw files only. Even if I was using a higher resolution jpeg I'd still only import raw. For me it's what Aperture is all about, and unlike say... wedding photography, this type of shoot is low volume so there's no advantage in working with jpeg, and many advantages in working with raw.
    Actually, I use another import option for pairs: 'matching Raw files only'. This is a huge timesaver. It means that during the shoot we can rate the photos (jpegs) as we go, and I'm only importing the raws that meet that rating. IE I don't have to import the entire shoot and try to remember which lighting set-up (for eg)  the director liked best.
    Hope that helps. Also, take a look under "more like this" upper right on this page. Some good stuff in there.
    Charles

  • Unable to see RAW thumbails in bridge

    I'm not seeing RAW tumbnails in bridge CS4, whereas I can see them on the desktop screen when I copy them there. If I browse to these files in bridge again I still can't see the thumbnails, and at the same time it is visible on desktop. I downloaded Pentax drivers, graphic card drivers and moved over files to other locations. Also the open in camera raw function is not lite up in Bridge. Files open by the way when I click on them in Camera Raw. Any suggestions? I'm running Windows Vista. Thanks.

    art impression wrote:
    I downloaded Pentax drivers, graphic card drivers and moved over files to other locations. Also the open in camera raw function is not lite up in Bridge. Files open by the way when I click on them in Camera Raw. Any suggestions? I'm running Windows Vista. Thanks.
    The camera software should not have any influence on how Bridge processes pictures.  One red light is moving files.  If you have edited the RAW files and them moved it, or renamed it,  outside of Bridge you could get the XMP file seperated from the image file (or different name).  If that happens it might cause you loose the thumbnail.  To check this you can look at the folder in Windows Explorer, but as they are hidden files the option to view hidden files must be checked.  While there also check to see if the thumbnals are OK.  If some do not show you may have a contaminated file casusing the problem.
    Once you check on this select tools/cache/purge cache for xxx folder (use problem folder).  Let them rebuild and see if you get the thumbnails.

  • How is the Raw data used in iPhoto. I currently shoot both jpeg and raw and import them both into iPhoto.

    How is the Raw data used in iPhoto? I currently shoot both jpeg and raw and import them both into iPhoto. What do I gain by collecting Raw data?
    Thanks

    You get more parameters for making adjustments to the image. This is not really an iPhoto question but more a general photography one. In rather simple terms here's how a digital camera works:
    You expose an image. A lot of data is gathered in by the sensor. But it's just a bug lump of data and not very useful in that form.
    In cameras that shoot jpeg that mass of data is interpreted/processed into an actual image, and the image is stored in a jpeg file. (that's a process broadly analogous to developing a film). The decisions that go into making that interpretation are all made by an engineer somewhere, back when the camera was developed.
    If you shoot Raw, then what you do is take that mass of data, and rather than working to the decisions made by that engineer, you develop the shot - you run the digital darkroom.
    Why would you do this? Take on all this extra work? Well one of three reasons: a: you think you can do a better job than that engineer. b: you just prefer the result you get when you develop yourself or c: you're a hopeless shooter and raw means you have more options to fix the mistakes you made in the camera. (That's why I do it.)
    Here endeth the two dollar tour. So, basically, if you're happy with what your camera produces in Jpeg then there's really no need to shoot Raw.
    There's no need at all to shoot Raw+Jpeg as iPhoto creates a jpeg preview when you import, so you're just wasting space.

  • Why won't Aperture 2 support RAW files imported from Canon 60D when it does from my Olympus DSLR?

    Why won't Aperture 2 support RAW files imported from Canon 60D when it does from my Olympus DSLR?

    I'm afriad the fact that your Olympus dSLR is supported is no relevance.
    The Raw from every model of camera is different. Note: that's every model not every brand. So, the NEF produced by a Nikon D40 is not the same as the NEF produced by a D60, the CR2 produced by a Canon 350 is not the same as the CR2 produced by a Canon 400.
    Support for individual camera models has to be added one by one, and Apple will update the OS to work with the most recent version of the software. That's an incentive for you to keep up-to-date. So, for support for your 60D you'll need 10.6.5 plus Aperture 3 and/or iPhoto 11.
    Regards
    TD

  • Fuji x-trans raw files import extremely slow

    WIn 7 pro 3.6 AMD quad core 16 gb ram 1.2 tb raid 0 WD Velociraptor drives. Lightroom 5.6
    I have a fairly quick system and my 24mp Sony raw files import and render full sized previews reasonably quickly -but it takes about 5x longer for my Fuji X-T1 raw files to import and render full size previews.  If I import into Capture One Pro 7 or 8 or into Photo Ninja both the Sony and the Fuji files import and render previews quickly. It is only Lightroom that is so incredibly slow with the Fuji raw files.
    I have used LR since version one and my files have always imported reasonably fast , however, the Fuji raw files have been slow to import from the very first import.  Ex - yesterday I imported 312 raf files (Fuji raw files) and it took 31 minutes to complete. I also imported 257 Sony raw files and the import  plus full sized preview rendering was completed in just under 5 minutes.
    Am I missing something in the preferences or import workflow?
    Thanks for any help
    BOb

    Thanks for the quick reply! :-)
    The setup is identical as when I work with my Nikon-files; I always start by "manually" copy the files from the memorycard to correct location/disk.
    In LR I use the "Add" option when I import to my catalog, so the file transfer is not part of the equation....
    Even the large files from Nikon D810 is faster to "add" than the files from the X-T1.
    But, as you write, it might come down to X-Trans-files (RAF) is not as optimal for Adobe processing as the Nikon raw files (NEF)...
    M.

  • Merge JPEG and RAW after import from iPhoto

    Hi,
    camera is set to shoot JPEG + RAW, iPhoto manages after import from camera as two separate files.
    I want to transition from iPhoto to Aperture.
    After importing from iPhoto into Aperture, is there any chance to merge the files in a way similar to how Aperture merges jpeg + raw when importing directly from camera?
    Thx
    Axel

    When I click on Faces, it's empty, the import from iPhoto forget to import faces?
    Hello Kris,
    How did you imort from iPhoto? If you import using the Aperture Apllication menu
         File -> Import -> iPh.oto Library
    then all your Faces should be transferred from iPhoto.
    Which of the two buttons in Aperture do you use to show your "Faces"? There is the "Faces" button in the Library panel and the "Faces" Button in the Toolbar. Both behave differently. The "Faces" button in the Library panel  will reveal all faces, whereas the "Faces" Button in the Toolbar will only show the faces detected in the in the currently selected item (folder, project). So it may appear that faces are missing, even if they are included in the Aperture Library.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • How do I delete the jpeg from raw+jpeg imported images?

    Hi,
    Back in the day, I shot lots of images using raw+jpeg and imported them into Lightroom.  Now I realize those jpegs add no value and I'd like to recover the disk space that they're collectively occupying.
    Is there a good way to:
    1. Identify all images in a catalog which have raw+jpeg?
    2. Remove just the jpeg for these images?
    Thanks!

    $$PhotoHobby wrote:
    I'm very hesistant to take the chance on any 3rd party script.
    Just so ya know, what the deletion feature in RawPlusJpeg does is ultra simple:
    1. Identifies extraneous jpeg files.
    2. Presents them for you to review.
    3. Deletes the extraneous jpeg files, if you approve. (puts them in the recycle bin if possible).
    It does nothing to the database nor anything else.
    You sync folders with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' afterward, which is what sets the database right.
    The only potential for trouble is the criteria for determining which jpegs are extraneous.
    It has no direct access to the database, so what it does is check for jpegs with same base name as raw (which *must* be present in catalog, and on disk), that aren't in the catalog, which includes the jpegs associated with RAW+JPEG (imported as a unit), *and* any jpegs that were imported separately, but subsequently removed from the catalog, or had never been imported.
    So, what it does will be the perfect thing to do, *if* you first synchronize folders (with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' checked) to pull any jpegs in to the catalog that were previously imported separately, but may have been inadvertently removed from the catalog (or had never been imported), before invoking the delete feature of the plugin.
    Note: You must do that for any manual procedure too, or you will have the same problem, except in the manual case, you won't have the benefit of the plugin checking your work, and presenting the files to be deleted, before you commit.
    It's your call, obviously, and to save Geoff the Kiwi from pointing this out: the plugin comes with no guarantee, warranty, or any other kind of tea.
    Consider backing up catalog and photo files before doing this maintenance, whether manual, or plugin-assisted.
    In my opinion, the plugin-assisted method is much safer than the manual method, which is the only reason it was written, *not* to save steps, although it does that too. For example, you can not, with the plugin, delete any jpegs that do not have a corresponding RAW in the catalog and on disk, period. - unless there is a bug of course, but there probably isn't , at least not one that would change the aforementioned assertion... - it wouldn't take much of a bug to cause it to barf, but it would take a big bug to cause it to delete files that weren't on the list, etc...
    Seriously, I don't think you have to wait for Adobe on this one. I wouldn't (I didn't - my catalog is all clean now!...).
    PS - there is *very* little recorded in the database about the jpeg sidecar - it's existence upon import (when "as a unit") - that's about it. Most of the funny business about updating that we were fumbling with above, stems from the software (and the person at the keyboard), *not* the database. Syncing folders with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' checked, once the jpeg sidecars have been cleaned up, *will* set the database straight!
    Cheers,
    Rob.

  • Can't see raw files

    I can't see raw files, only jpeg.

    Kyrrar,
    Please check the compatibility of the camera raw file with your camera by following the link below:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cam eras.html
    If updating the lightroom to the above version still has issues please try to uninstall and reinstall and update the Lightroom again to same version.
    Mandhir

  • Safari can't see latest iphoto import

    One thing that drives me nuts about my new mac is that if I import a new photo in iPhoto (i.e. from Flash drive or iPhone) it can never find it until I restart my computer. If you're in facebook or blogger or anything, and you click to upload a file, it will only see whatever you imported previously, not the latest pictures.
    Clearly, something's set up funny. Ideas?
    -Brendan

    Hi,
    You can sync photos using iTunes from your iPhone to your Mac then upload to Facebook.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1386
    Sync content to your Mac from your iPhone help here.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1296
    Carolyn
    Message was edited by: Carolyn

  • Bug? Raw+Jpeg imports from an iPad mini

    Hi Everyone
    I've come across a very strange importing issue with iPhoto 9.6 (910.29). I'm always on the go so I use my iPad mini as photo storage until I gain access to a computer. I’d take my pictures on the camera and then I’ll plug the sd card to the iPad and copy everything that is on the card (via the Apple Lightning to SD card Camera reader).
    I take pictures in (1) RAW only, (2) RAW+Jpeg and (3)Jpeg only.
    When I import from the camera to the MacBook Pro directly via USB:
    all the 3 formats are properly imported.
    When I import from the iPad in iPhoto:
    The pictures shot in (1) RAW only and (3)Jpeg only are imported properly
    But when I import the (2) RAW+Jpeg ones, iPhoto will only import the Jpeg versions and will give me the error message "Unreadable file: The following files could not be imported. The file is in an unrecognized format" for the RAW versions of the same image.
    Here is what I do not understand:
    - The RAW format that my camera uses (.RW2 for Panasonic FZ1000) is supported so there shouldn't be any issue.
    - (1) RAW only pictures are correctly imported
    - all formats are correctly imported when importing directly from the camera.
    It seems this bug only affects RAW+Jpeg imports from the iPad?
    Has anyone come across this issue before and if so, is there a fix or workaround? It is not that much of an issue as the RAW only files can still be imported from the iPad but I find this issue very curious.
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    Not sure about the fix but the workaround is to not shoot Raw+Jpeg, which is pretty pointless anyway, as importing the Raw to iPhoto means it creates a Jepg preview, so you end up with Raw +Jpeg+Jepg...

  • Unable to see raw files in Finder and therefor can't import in aperture

    I have loaded my raw files from the CF card (Canon 4DII) into a directory on the Mac. I go into Aperture, select import and select the directory where the files are and none of the raw files appear.
    I go into iPhoto and they appear and I am able to import them into iPhoto.
    I need to import the files into Aperture. How can I get Aperture to "see" the files in the finder directory?

    Hi New
    It doesn't look like your camera is supported, which is why your raw files don't show up to import.
    (Check the list here, for sure
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html)
    Mine isn't either.
    I use DNG Converter from Adobe (Free) to convert my RAW files to DNG. The .DNG files ( not '.dng') are then readable by Aperture.
    You can get the app here: (or just go to Adobe's website)
    http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/16064
    What I do:
    Open DNG converter
    Select the folder with the raw files
    Save in new location:
    Select folder: and create a DNG folder inside the original folder with the RAW images)
    File Extension .DNG
    Convert.
    When i import into Aperture, I choose the option to 'Store files in their original location' (which is an external drive foe me) ... this way i'm not getting duplicates and taking up more space.
    Sorry I couldn't be more helpful
    Elizabeth

Maybe you are looking for

  • After reinstalling mountain lion i got the question mark on the screen

    hi everyone, after reinstalling mac os x 10.8 from internet recovery, mac restarts itself which is normal. but when it starts there is a question mark on a folder symbol on the gray screen. what should i do?

  • IMovie crashes every time I attempt to export or view projects full screen. Any solutions? Will upgrade to iLife '11 (iMovie 9.0) fix this?

    The subject line of this post pretty much explains everything. I use a MacBook White from 2009 which I upgraded to Snow Leopard earlier this year.  I use iMovie 8.0.6, have never upgraded to iLife '11 (iMovie 9.0). I've never in these 3 years had a p

  • IPhone 3G is dead

    I clicked erase all content so I could sell my iPhone 3G. Then the battery died in the middle of the process. I have held down the power and home and it did not do anything. Please tell me what to do so I can sell it. Is there something I can press,

  • Final Cut Studio Plugins

    Does anybody know where I can buy good plugins for Final Cut Pro? I'm looking more for the dramatic type of plugins...such as flickering in and out of the edges of the video, things like that. The closest movie that I can think of that has a lot of t

  • Use microphone and sounds muted on iPone4 only

    Hi We develop an application that records audio with microphone. Once the recorded sound, all audio sounds of the application ahve been muted. If it would be muted during the record only, it would be ok. I just want to know how to restore the other s