Seeking Recommendations for New System

I’m planning to upgrade my son’s Pentium II computer with the  following components.  Please give constructive comments for improvements, realizing that this is my limit in regard to costs:
MOBO – MSI K7N2 Delta-L or MSI KT6V-LSR or MSI KT4VL
Graphics Card --
RADEON 9600 PRO 128MB DDR AGP 8X W/TV-OUT/DVI or RADEON 9600 256MB DDR WITH CRT/DVI/TV-OUT or RADEON 9800SE 128MB W/TV OUT
CPU – AMD Athlon 2500+ Barton

Well, I can say, don't buy the 256mb vid card cuz its slower than the 128mb cards.  And yes I do regret buying the one I have right now instead of a regular 128.
You can read this thread about one user's choice and why.
About the mobo, well... I like Intel chips better and don't have much experience with the amd setups, but I did notice that the deltas are often used in overclocking and have been proven as stable and reliable.
Please keep in mind that these are only opinions.
In reality, whatever you choose in that list will make for a good setup... exept for most 256mb vid cards(the high end ones are better, but not in everyones price range).
Good luck.
(EDIT) Oh and so that you know, 9800 is better than 9600, and rankings go like this:
se -> cheap alternative to the real thing
no ranking (known as non pro)  -> the real thing as the were when they came out
pro -> performance version
xt -> super performance version
,and an 9600 xt is almost as good as a 9800 se (actually very close to it)
Ask around in the vid card forum for more input from others.
And the mobo, well like I said, I ain't no pro with the amd setups.

Similar Messages

  • Recommendations for new mobo using AMD processor

    I am still successfully using my current computer built in 2008 with a K9A2 Platinum mobo. It has been a remarkably reliable mobo with literally no major problems over the years and the mobo has been easily expandable to whatever desktop hardware I have used with it. So I have been very impressed with MSI hardware technology.
    But its time for a new modern mobo and computer system for me which will be a bit faster than what I am currently using.  Considering how reliable the K9A2 platinum has been I am looking at buying a modern MSI mobo using one of the latest and best AMD processors. I am not a gamer, or even an overclocker, but I do want a flexible and reliable system to use. I am a programmer so that things like compilation/link/build speed and program number-crunching execution speed are important for me and of course absolutely good reliability.
    I have been away from the latest computer hardware arena for a number of years, except to buy an occasional add-on for my current system, so I have to educate myself on the latest and greatest being offered, as well as new terminology. I have the money to spend for the best technologies in desktop use, and I enjoy putting together a top-flight system for what my own use case as a programmer. My computer will end up be multi-boot ( I use BIBM ) running mainly Windows 7 and/or Windows 8, as well as a smattering of Linux distros ( Suse, Fedora, Ubuntu mainly ).
    I already have a top-end Lian-Li full-tower chassis, a PC-79, that can house most any type mobo, and has room to spare for almost anything I want to do with my new system.
    Recommendations or suggestions about the latest MSI mobos using AMD CPUs would be welcome. With all the new technology out there it is hard to know what works well, is reliable, and is extensible for any new hardware, especially faster CPUs, in the future.

    Quote from: Bernhard on 18-July-14, 04:17:30
    FM2+ CPU development is at the forefront. They are APUs and are meant as a unique processing unit that can perform better in terms of integrated Graphics than anything that Intel has to offer. Their current CPU performance is not competitive. So if you want raw CPU power, then the FX8 series is the better option.
    Here are the benchmark tests as performed by chip.de who apply a consistent test for most current CPU/APU. http://www.chip.de/bestenlisten/Bestenliste-Desktop-Prozessoren--index/detail/id/693/
    Benchmarks:                PCMark 7 (1.0.4),   Excel 2010 SP1-Monte-Carlo-Simulation,  Cinebench RR11.5, 64Bit,   WinRAR 4.01, 64Bit,  TrueCrypt 7.1 AES-Twofish-Serpent, HandBrake 0.9.5,
    A10-7850K (FM2+)       3381points            12.5 seconds                                          3.6 points                          2.3MB/sec                  155MB/sec                                     21.5fps
    FX8350 (AM3+)            3243points              5.4 seconds                                          7.0 points                          4.6MB/sec                  259MB/sec                                     35.2fps
    Benchmarks:               CyberLink MediaEspresso 6.5, PovRay 3.7 RC3, 1.280x1024 no AA,  Blender 2.49b,
    A10-7850K (FM2+)       4.120sec                               759 Pixel/s                                       72 secs
    FX8350 (AM3+)            2.418sec                               1 429 Pixel/s                                    55 secs
    No socket or chipset will be out there forever. Just look at the frequent changes Intel makes and how AMD has been doing the same. So one has to make a decision on the best compromise available at the time and commit.
    I can see the AM3+/AM3 CPUs are faster than the FM2+/FM2 APUs. Seems strange then that AMD would stop improving the AM3 line and go entirely with the FM2 line for the future. I understand graphics are big for gamers but still there are serious programmers/workers who want speed and also want to save a little money by buying AMD instead of Intel. I admit it looks like the higher end Intel CPUs are the speed champions, and I can certainly afford them if I want, but I have always gone for the friendlier AMD processors and mobos. Maybe I am just foolish since, unlike many who buy AMD for its overclocking ability, I am just looking for speed and reliability.
    Thanks for all the information !

  • Recommendation for new features in next Sun Studio releases

    Hello,
    I have started using the Sun Studio Express recently and as a feedback to your opening to receive proposals to new features in the next releases of the Sun Studio collection I would want to point some aspects of interest to the programmers in writing good software for embedded systems and not only.
    First of all, with regards to the subject of great interest to me in this moment, multicore/multiprocessor parallel programming, I would appreciate the following :
    - if the compiler would be extended with new directives to allow the programmer to measure the load of each core and/or processor that is available to him.
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to get the core ID on which a specific section of code is executed. As en example consider o multithreaded application and in the associated function for each thread read the core ID and function of this value perform specific actions.
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to get the ID of the processor in the system - supposing a specific system has many multicore processors. (I don't know if this is possible).
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to specify the core and/or processor on which it wants to be executed a specific process,thread,function,(maybe instruction).
    With these macros I think a lot of things can be exercised, one that I think in this moment is the posibility for the programmer to implement his own algorithm of load balancing for the cores and processors of his system.
    Another point I would recommend would be that the watch window in the Sun Studio IDE to permit the selection of the format in which the data to be displayed.As an example if I have a U32 variable to be able to select in the watch window the integer ,hexadecimal or binary format in which I would want to be displayed.
    Another useful thins that I sought at other IDEs would be a popup window or something similar to select how to see the source code: as a .c file , as an assembler code , or as a mixture of C and assemble.
    That's all for the moment, if I see something else I would post another message.
    Thank you,
    Steve.

    steveg wrote:
    First of all, with regards to the subject of great interest to me in this moment, multicore/multiprocessor parallel programming, I would appreciate the following :
    - if the compiler would be extended with new directives to allow the programmer to measure the load of each core and/or processor that is available to him.
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to get the core ID on which a specific section of code is executed. As en example consider o multithreaded application and in the associated function for each thread read the core ID and function of this value perform specific actions.
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to get the ID of the processor in the system - supposing a specific system has many multicore processors. (I don't know if this is possible).
    - if the compiler would be extended with directives to allow the programmer to specify the core and/or processor on which it wants to be executed a specific process,thread,function,(maybe instruction).
    With these macros I think a lot of things can be exercised, one that I think in this moment is the posibility for the programmer to implement his own algorithm of load balancing for the cores and processors of his system.
    These are OS functions, not compiler's. Solaris has a wide selection of ways and tools to assign processes and threads to cpus; processor_bind(2) is a function you can call and pbind(1M) is a tool you can use on a running app. There are more, just google for it.
    Another point I would recommend would be that the watch window in the Sun Studio IDE to permit the selection of the format in which the data to be displayed.As an example if I have a U32 variable to be able to select in the watch window the integer ,hexadecimal or binary format in which I would want to be displayed.
    Good point. I'll check if there already is an RFE (Request For Enhancement) filed and file one if it's not. Thanks for letting us know!
    Another useful thins that I sought at other IDEs would be a popup window or something similar to select how to see the source code: as a .c file , as an assembler code , or as a mixture of C and assemble.
    But there is disassembly window already. See screenshot here: http://developers.sun.ru/images/stories/sunstudio/images/sun_studio_dbx.png

  • Recommendations for new Printer needed!

    Hi!
    Like a dolt, I dropped my printer and now it doesn't want to work anymore (imagine that!) I'm overwhelmed by the choices, so I was hoping to get a recommendation for a great all-purpose color ink jet printer for under $200. I do a lot of 8 x 10 prints that I like to frame so image quality is top priority.
    Thanks so much in advance!
    Amie

    Here's a link to the Canon USA page for printers. Note there are several under $200. The ones that have a little red "new" by them use an ink system that's new from Canon.
    http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=103
    Here's a quote I copied from one of the individual printer descriptions:
    "A system for long-lasting photos.
    The Canon ChromaLife100 system combines the PIXMA iP6220D Photo Printer's FINE print head technology and newly developed inks with select Canon photo papers, with results rivaling that of many conventional photos. These beautiful photos will also last up to 100 years when stored in an archival quality photo album."
    I think you'd be very happy with a Canon. I understand Epsons are great, but they continue to have a problem with clogging if not treated with great care, and the Canon ink cartridges (one for each color, by the way) are less expensive, too. Canon paper seems a little harder to find, but I've also seen some good buys at Office Depot recently, so I think places are now stocking more since Canon has become such a big contender in the field of consumer grade inkjet printers. (Sorry for the huge runon sentence, but I'm too lazy to edit!)

  • NEED RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW MP3 PLAYER

    I have a Clip+ and a Fuze+, but both are old and the battery will not hold a charge for very long.  I've been considering the Clip Sport.  I love  the interface of my old Fuze+...the way all your music (internal and external drives) all show up on one list.  I also saw on Sandisk.com that for the Clip Sport the higest SDHC card recommended for mp3 is 8GB.  I can live with that, I guess.  Does anyone find it inconvenient to go back and forth from the internal drive to the card when selecting music to play or for making a playlist? I'd really like to get a Clip Zip, but I found an grossly overpriced refurb on ebay. Does anyone know where I can find a reasonably priced Clip Zip?  I'll be looking forward to hearing from users RE recommendations for a new player.  Thanks in advance.

    "I'd really like to get a Clip Zip, but I found an grossly overpriced refurb on ebay." Refurb Clip Zip 4GB players are priced at $30 on Ebay. Yes, new ones are a bit expensive. At less than half the price of a new one though, imo the refurbs are worth the risk, especially if you buy two of them. As for the Clip Sport, it has a limit of 2,000 songs for each of the internal memory and the card memory. I use 256 kbps mp3 for my music. It took around 14GB for me to reach the 2,000 song limit, so I use a 16GB card in my Clip Sport. A 16GB card holds around 14.6GB or so of files. The Sport can't combine songs from internal and card memory into a single playlist. I also have Clip+ and Clip Zip players which I have put Rockbox on. Rockbox is a free alternative firmware (operating system) which is available for the Clip+, Clip Zip, Fuze, and Fuze+, but not the Clip Sport or Clip Jam. Rockbox enables many additional features, and has a huge song database. Some format 128GB micro SDXC card  as FAT 32, fill it with songs, and use it in a Rockboxed Clip+ or  Rockboxed Clip Zip. The Clip Sport is okay if you don't have a large number of songs you want on the player. Some might buy a 4GB one for example, and use the internal storage for classical music and podcasts, and have a 16GB or 32GB card in it for rock music. If you are okay with 2,000 or fewer songs on a player, then the Clip Sport would be good for you. Yes, you could put around another 1,000 songs in internal memory at 256 kbps if you get an 8GB Sport, but then you couldn't integrate those together in a playlist with songs on the card. Depending on the average length of your songs, you might need a 32GB card to reach the 2,000 song limit, especially if your songs are at 320kbps mp3. Also keep in mind that Sandisk players(except for those that support Rockbox and have Rockbox installed on them) have trouble with cards faster than class 4, so using a Sandisk class 4 micro SDHC card is advise for maximum compatability. Some 32GB cards by other makers might cause problems in Sandisk players even if they are class 4 or slower. 

  • Recommendations for speaker systems for DVD player/recorder

    I'm getting a DVD recorder soon and I hope to get some recommendations on suitable Creative speaker systems.
    The room is fairly big but the TV area is rather confined..so i prefer a set whose speakers are not too big or bulky or numerous (i think i'll stop at 5.1 since i have limited space to put the speakers). Budget is flexible, but of course the cheaper the better (hopefully under $350).
    The TV sounds good when watching TV programs but it reproduces an unbalanced ratio of muddy dialogue and loud sound effects when playing back DVDs. I end up having to crank up the volume so high to hear what the characters are saying, and of course, the background audio gets boosted way loud as well. So my main consideration is reproducing clear speech and dialogue and crisp (not overly loud) background audio - any recommendations for this?
    Which models have an optical/coaxial input? Can i just hook up the speakers to the optical/coaxial or RCA outputs of the DVD recorder/player since most models have in-built DTS decoders? Which are the least problematic models?
    Thank you.

    I think I have the same question more or less. I bought a cheap Best Buy memorex speaker docking station and I need a male to female IPOD cable so that I can Play the radio and charge the IPOD at the same time as well of course have the head phone jack plugged into the Line In that acts as the antenna.
    So if I had the Male to Female cable My dock would charge and the cable to the line in acts as a Antenna. I think this makes sense..

  • HEY APPLE! What are upgrade policy plans for new systems shipping with 10.4

    I just ordered a brand new Xserver, thinking that there would be some policy in place for brand new computers shipping with 10.4, to get the new version of OSX Leopard Server (without having to buy a retail copy) - however to my surprise, there is nothing currently in place.
    Will there be an upgrade policy soon for users who have just ordered new computers, currently shipping with 10.4??? Or should we return recently ordered items, and stop ordering new systems until they start shipping with 10.5?

    Assumptions such as this one are often a recipe for disappointment and/or for extra expenses; I've certainly learned to be cautious with these.
    In this case, there is a policy that has been in place (AFAIK) since the Leopard announcement.
    For details on and requirements of the Leopard upgrade policy, do read the [Mac OS X Up To Date|http://www.apple.com/macosx/uptodate> web site.
    Those folks outside the Leopard upgrade window that are upgrading to Leopard (and that don't have a separately-purchased Right-to-Upgrade) will be purchasing and ordering the upgrade. You may end up purchasing an iLife upgrade, too — if you're using it, and not already at the current release — as Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server upgrades apparently do not include an iLife upgrade.

  • Which MB should i pick for new system?

    Hi i'm new to the forum and just signed up. Sorry if this isn't posted in the right section. I'm about to build a new system with a AMD 64 +3700 (which i allready bought)
    But i can't choose the right MB. Last time i built something it was 2 years ago. Much have changed :o
    I've been looking at this MB for a while.
    K8N Neo4-FI
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=651
    I have 2 questions about it
    1. I've read that the NB Fan is loud. Can i replace it with something else?
    2. I haven't decide which video card to get. But i wonder if any of these 2 will fit cos of the NB?
    Sapphire Radeon X1800XT 256MB GDDR3
    XFX GeForce 7600GT 256MB GDDR3 XXX

    Quote from: Kafkacell on 28-May-06, 20:07:16
    Go for MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum 
    Yeah.. the Platinum is a more "feature rich" board & supposedly has a more tweakable BIOS as well. I like mine fine.
    Quote from: Kafkacell on 28-May-06, 18:43:13
    IMHO, we should wait to mature AM2 a little, and also as Richard has said to prices come down, but undoubtly that's the way to follow if you are planning to upgrade your system. There is no case upgrading now to 939, and in few months to AM2
    Very true - if you have a decent pile of 939 parts, there's no real reason not to use them.
    Quote from: Kafkacell on 28-May-06, 18:43:13
    and also AMD has said that no more 939's are going to be developed, just the models that has been produced until now.
    Now THAT is a rotten shame. It would have been nice to get 1 generation of 65nm, 939 CPU's as a "going away" present. Bet some of those would OC' like crazy...

  • Round cables for new system

    I went and ordered my new system components last night and now I need to figure out what cables I will need.
    I want to use the round cables as the flat ribbon cables impede airflow too much.
    I am not sure whether I want to put a floppy drive in or not as it isn't really needed these days, although it is nice for backing up Intenet Explorer Bookmarks quickly.
    Which round cables should I get for my new system, how would you connect them and where have you found the best prices on them?
    I believe the MSI GeForce4 Ti4200 video card comes with a round cable in the retail box I ordered so that takes care of one of them.
    I appreciate the help.  
    My system is going to be as follows:
    MSI K7N2 Delta-ILSR Mobo
    AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton processor
    Mushkin 512 MB PC2700 222 Level II Hi Performance RAM
    MSI G4Ti4200-VTD8X128 video card      
    Western Digital 80GB 8MB buffer HDD
    LITE ON 16X XJ-HD166S/165H DVD/CDROM
    TDK VeloCD 40x12x40 CDRW
    ChiefTec AX-01BLD SPX2 450W case  
    Thanks
    Mike

    Quote
    Originally posted by Mike V
    I went and ordered my new system components last night and now I need to figure out what cables I will need.
    I want to use the round cables as the flat ribbon cables impede airflow too much.
    I am not sure whether I want to put a floppy drive in or not as it isn't really needed these days, although it is nice for backing up Intenet Explorer Bookmarks quickly.
    Which round cables should I get for my new system, how would you connect them and where have you found the best prices on them?
    I believe the MSI GeForce4 Ti4200 video card comes with a round cable in the retail box I ordered so that takes care of one of them.
    I appreciate the help.  
    My system is going to be as follows:
    MSI K7N2 Delta-ILSR Mobo
    AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton processor
    Mushkin 512 MB PC2700 222 Level II Hi Performance RAM
    MSI G4Ti4200-VTD8X128 video card      
    Western Digital 80GB 8MB buffer HDD
    LITE ON 16X XJ-HD166S/165H DVD/CDROM
    TDK VeloCD 40x12x40 CDRW
    ChiefTec AX-01BLD SPX2 450W case  
    Thanks
    Mike
    Mike,
      Yes round cables are the way to go and they connect the same way as your ribbon cables. I use VANTEC in my machines but there are many good manufacturers. Try this link to check for the best prices http://www.pricewatch.com/
    The round cables are also very easy to tywrap out of the way for maximum airflow as you mentioned )

  • How to do initialization for new system setup?

    Hi, Experts:
    I need your help! Can you tell me your suggestion please?
    This is a new system setup. We are about to test on the Initialization/Delta process.
    The data source is 2LIS_13_VDITM 7.0 version. The test is on the PSA.
    I have done an EARLY Initialization. On R3 system, if a billing record is canceled, we are able to capture it in the RSA7. Then, we did a delta load which were successfully tranferred to BW system.
    However, if I created a new order and push it to Billing, I am NOT able to find it on RSA7 of the Delta queue.
    That would mean, the delta queue could not capture any new billing records.
    Then, besides the early init, we tried to do an Initialization without Data Transfer in the hope that this could resolve the new records issue, it doesn't allow to do it, saying "no 2 initialization".
    What is the right way to do initialization??
    Thanks guys!!

    Hello Sylvia,
    Changing it to new delta mode need not clean out everything in BW.
    its a change in R/3 side on how delta records will be pushed.
    Delta queue will remain the same in R/3.
    But since you have already missed some records and you are not sure which one.
    Also the existing records in the delta queue are not the correct one as these are not bringing new records according to you.
    So I will suggest you after you have done the changes to queued delta....do a fresh start.
    Delete the data from the DSO.
    1)delete the existing and do a new init without data transfer so that a new delta queue is created.
    2)Fill the set up tables first and start the full repair loads to DSO.
    3)once all the history is loaded then you can schedule the delta.
    Thanks
    Ajeet

  • Seeking Recommendations For A Snow Leopard-Compatible USB Hub

    It has been suggested that my CablesToGo 7-port powered USB hub might be the cause of some of the kernel panics I have experienced since upgrading to 10.6.4. I understand that there are no guarantees when it comes to USB, but is there a brand that seems to have fewer problems than others? I don't need 7 ports, just reliability.

    Is this one bus powered? Hard to tell from the picture and I couldn't find anything that looked similar on the Belkin site; in any case, personally I would only recommend hubs that are self-powered - see this excerpt of a Wiki article:
    +A bus-powered hub is a hub that draws all its power from the host computer's USB interface. It does not need a separate power connection. However, many devices require more power than this method can provide, and will not work in this type of hub.+
    +USB current (related to power) is allocated in units of 100 mA up to a maximum total of 500 mA per port. Therefore a compliant bus powered hub can have no more than four downstream ports and cannot offer more than four 100 mA units of current in total to downstream devices (since one unit is needed for the hub itself). If more units of current are required by a device than can be supplied by the port it is plugged into, the operating system usually reports this to the user.+
    +In contrast a self-powered hub is one that takes its power from an external power supply unit and can therefore provide full power (up to 500 mA) to every port. Many hubs can operate as either bus powered or self powered hubs.+

  • Seeking recommendations for handling large binary documents with security(preferable) for inbound and outbound scenarios from OSB- SOA and SOA- OSB

    Hi,
    I am currently working on a project with the following requirements
    1. Client transfers binary document (between 1-20MB in size) from OSB proxy to SOA composite to Content Management system
    2. Client retrieves binary document (between 1-20MB in size) from Content Management system to SOA composite to OSB proxy
    In otherwords, a inbound and outbound integration.
    What I have tried so far and my results:
    Scenario A
    1. Enabled MTOM on SOA composite by attaching wsmtom policy
    2. Created an OSB business service and consumed the SOA composite application
    3. Enabled MTOM on OSB proxy and business service and configured it to pass by reference
    Scenario B
    1. Enabled MTOM and security on SOA composite by attaching wsmtom policy and SAML policy
    2. Created an OSB business service and consumed the SOA composite application
    3. Enabled MTOM on OSB proxy and business service and configured it to pass by reference
    I have a demo integration setup that writes a binary document to a file using the above steps. My SOA composite has a file adapter that writes the binary data to an external file and it is exposed as a web service with a simple WSDL definition that has an inline XSD schema with an single element of base64binary type. I have added a mediator that maps this base64binary element node to the file adapter's input node.
    Result for Scenario A with file size less than 1 MB:
    Flawless execution with sub-second response times
    Result for Scenario A with file size of 8MB
    First attempt: SOA composite faults with database transaction related error, solved by increasing JTA timeout
    Second attempt: Flawless execution, but file transfer took over 100 seconds to complete. This is very poor performance and my suspicions are that this cannot be the expected behaviour, but I dont know the internal workings of the SOA composite and why its taking this long.
    Result for Scenario B:
    The OSB business service does not accept/recognize the SAML policy in the WSDL and suggests to configure OWSM policies manually, but OWSM policy in OSB does not have the wsmtom policy. Regardless of this, any permutation of MTOM + WSS security in this integration scenario either did not work outright or MTOM optimization was not happening ie binary data was materalizing in the message body.
    I have only about 3 weeks left to implement a viable solution and the closest ive come to a solution is Scenario A but that +100 second response time for an 8MB file is really worrying.
    I would appreciate any level of guidance, recommendations or suggestions as to how I go about tackling this problem.
    Thanks
    regards,
    Johnny

    I think this is due to the underlying mechanism of weblogic classloading..
    You can contact oracle support @ https://support.oracle.com to report issues. Roughly this is the process .
    1- get the Oracle Customer Support Identifier (CSI) for the client you are working for.
    2- Create a user profile quoting the CSI. This will send an approval request to oracle support admins at your client.
    3- Get the oracle support admins at your client site to approve your request for support access.
    4-Once they approve , you can access the support site and raise service requests.

  • No size history for SQL Database in dbacockpit for new system

    Hello,
    we have installed a new ERP 6.0 System on Windows with SQL Server 2005 (3 month ago)
    Now we haven´t any data in datbase size historie in the dbacockpit.
    The message is: No size history.  Check the DB Collector status.
    We checked already the state of Collector. It is running every 20 minutes and collect data for performance. But not for the growth of the database.
    We also deleted the job at the SQL Agent and planned it new with the report MSSPROCS.
    Does anyone have an idea whats the problem?
    Best regards
    Petra Wöritz

    Hello all together,
    we are facing the same problem until now.
    I checked all the points you suggested:
    - the performance collector job runs in client 000
    - time zone is set to CET
    - the SAPOSCOL is running
    - no errors by executing the SQL statement EXECUTE sap_dbcoll
    - no errors in SQL Job SAP_sid_SID_MSSQL_COLLECTOR
    We don't have any data in size history.
    But we found a error message in dev_w0:
    C  dbdsmss: DBSL26 SQL3621C  Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK__#perfinfo_________0C5BC11B'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.#perfinfo'.The statement has been terminated
    It occurs, when we try get the data of history in db02 (or dbacockpit).
    The note 1171828 doen't fit.
    We have already SAP_BASIS     701     0007
    We've got a system with SAP_BASIS     702     0006
    There the error is displayed in dbacockpit directly:
    SQL-Fehler 2627: [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Violatio n of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK__#perfinfo________ _5A303401'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object
    Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Petra

  • HD configuration for new system

    Hey guys,
    I'm planning to build a new workstation and just wanted to have some ideas regarding the HD configuration.
    Working  with cs6 PR AE PS LR + few 3d party plugins mostly on canon 5D mk 3 footage
    editing, grading, keying + some 3d stuff
    what i have as a setup no assembled at the moment :
    i7 4930k
    Mb: Asrock x79 extreme 11   http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/X79%20Extreme11/
    Ram : Corsair vengeance pro series 32 gb 4x8  2133mhz
    VGA gigabyte nvidia 780ti
    Power supp:  AeroCool Strike-X Power 1100W 80 PLUS GOLD
    Cooling system; Corsair Hydro Series H100i
    case  NZXT Phantom 530
    and 1 kingston HyperX  3K 240 gb SSD
    other hd configurations!!! still waiting your ansewer
    in my area i have Seagate Desktop SSHD and barracuda  HD and few ssd
    after few weeks reading everything about hd in adobe forum, i am still confused what to use as a raid or individual hds and what can change hd speed  for ex the "Hibernate"...
    also my mb is equiped with a raid controller and i dnt have any idea about it.
    please i need some help form pro guys
    Thx alot

    Huge thanks to everyone who has spent his time answering my questions. your answers are very helpful.
    first time i know that raid 5 needs enterprise drives and even in the following 2 links and few other forums i didn't see this information "or maybe i didnt pay attention"
    http://ppbm7.com/index.php/tweakers-page/84-disk-setup/95-disk-setup
    http://ppbm7.com/index.php/tweakers-page/85-raid-or-not-to-raid/96-rai d-or-not-to-raid
    as I said before, my work is based on canon 5d mk III footage for music video and few youtube promo for musicians and singers (i am a bass guitar player as a second job)
    my main workflow is based on editing, coloring, keying + 3d object inserted in after effect
    and because i cant use raid until i get the Areca controller and dedicated HDD i will go to this following disc setup
    I will use my ssd hyperX for os and page files
    1 more ssd Kingston v 300 for windows temp ( i need to make a search for how to move this folder to new drive, during of after OS and application installation)
    1 HHd for pics, small video sources and  3d objects maybe
    2 tb hdd for project, media footage,
    2 tb hdd renders preview, media cash.
    2x 2tb raid 0 as export + external e-sata or usb3 hdd for backup  every time
    is this fine for my needs?
    i am still confused with page files and windows temp
    Thank you again
    Wajdi

  • Help with plan for new system

    I was hoping to get a little expert advice on the system that I am planning on building. I was looking at picking up the "MSI Z68A-GD80 (B3)" motherboard, along with an Intel 510 SSD 120 gb drive. I am planning on partitioning the SSD into two drives, one for the max 64 gb ISRT cache, and the other with the rest of the space for the win7 prof 64 bit OS drive.
    So my question is if the splitting of the SSD is possible like I mentioned?
    and next, what should I pick for a data/app drive? I am not sure whether to go with my usual 2 drive raid-0 setup, or simply get one drive since I will be using ISRT. Any suggestions?
    Another note, after I read about booting from USB devices, I plan on skipping the floppy drive 
    Thank you for any input.

    Booting of USB device can be set as a priority in BIOS.
    SSD is like any HDD, just do the partitioning during setup.
    RAID wise, it is up to your preference. Speed or Mirroring or Balance?

Maybe you are looking for