Seemingly Simple Audio Edits Driving Me Nuts

I have asked about this before, thought I had the proper answer, but alas it would seem not.
After joining audio (in most cases for music transitions) into Connected Storyline, I am often then unable to apply a Transition of perform a Roll Edit because it seems there is a space in there somewhere. I have tried the suggested remedy of Zooming in, using Position Tool to trim both sides of the edit, then deleting the space in between. It was explained the problem invovles sub frames which aren't always visible. Sometimes this works. It seems like there should be a quicker solution (it's especially cumbersome if your edit is otherwise well timed, and you have to re-tweak it once you pull the edges back,) but if it worked consistently I could live with it.
However, far too frequently, the process is not working, and I am redoing it over and over and over again until somehow it manages to take. I can end up spending 5 to 10 minutes on a simple audio edit, and needless to say, this is just unacceptable.
Can anyone tell me a reliable way to deal with this, or suggest what I might be doing wrong or something different I can try, because this is making me crazy. There has got to be an easier way. Any help appreciated.

dont think ive ever been able to get cross dissolves on audio to work. I now use FCPX as I would Logic or ProTools and I overlap audio clips and put manual fades on them. Actually its worth the extra work coz the joins are usually better. and you have ore control.
adam

Similar Messages

Ridiculously simple audio editing question for Garage Band

Ok, so this is really a fundamental
question. It concerns editing technique.
In analog mixing, the editor put
the sounds to be saved in the right
places on each of several tracks --
narration, sound effects, lip sync,
music, etc. The tracks were then
all locked together and the mixer
adjusted the volumes to either save
or reject audio information.
A blank master received the information
and that was your final product,
in sync, sprocket by sprocket, with
the video.
My question, then, is, how do you
do it in digital multitrack such as
Garage Band? Are you aiming to have
4 or 5 tracks all level controlled
or do you simple erase unwanted
sound, or what exactly do you do,
in post production? If you are going
to do a voice over, then you have to
do a mix at some point, not just a
cut and paste. What's the philosophy,
if you don't mind my asking?
Thanks,
Ed

Wow... you gave me flashbacks to a movie soundtrack I scored, with separate reels of tape all synced up and whirling away for final mixdown!
To answer your question as best I can in a paragraph or two, digital mixing is unlimited compared to analog. Whereas tape has a physical limit, you can always add another digital track (there are limitations to digital, but they are becoming harder to reach as systems become increasingly powerful). So no need to erase. Editing is also a breeze. Digital tracks are endlessly malleable, with virtually every parameter available for automation.
Sometimes you might mix down to stems or mix everything down to a stereo master (or alternative mixes) for post production. Similarly, in post, they can deal with huge numbers of digital tracks from different sources.
In terms of a professional workflow, Logic is the more typical choice over Garageband, and includes a number of features designed for scoring to picture: variable sample rates, frame rates, etc.
Gain staging in digital recording is different than in analog, and it requires a different approach to achieve excellent sounding results. But the digital workflow is so much more flexible, forgiving, and economical, that it has been the death-knell for the analog workflow. Infinite bussing, routing, mixing, comping, storing, stemming... infinite possibilities, really!

LR4: any AUDIO editing capability - simple (?) enhancement request

First, hats off to the Adobe team for a nice upgrade. I'm still getting used to the new slider layout, but am loving it already. Really nice to be able to pull back the highlights without the image going to crap.
In addition to shooting stills with my Canon 7D, I also shoot the occasional video. I'm just a hobbiest (so don't have the budget for Adobe Premier) but just like to do some simple edits. The new video capability in LR4 is very much appreciated ... but I can't seem to find any audio editing capability - I suspect none exists.
As a software developers, I know the LightRoom team is pretty busy with bug squashing on the just released LR4 ... but a very useful feature would be the ability to export with/without a sound track, merge with an external track, or discard one of the stero tracks and convert the other to a mono signal.
You might ask why would you want to do the later? The reason is the *&^%$#@! Canon 7D (and many other DSLR's) use AGC (Automatic Gain Control) for their audio ... so it basically sounds like crap as the levels wander up and down. Fortunately, there are some 3rd party amps (placed between the microphone and camera) that can "defeat" the AGC by inserting a signal in one of the stereo tracks ... and this way you get consistant levels. So right now, I have to open up the video file with Audicity (which pulls the audio) then delete the one track and use the other as a mono signal. I then save that WAV file, open the video back up in Quicktime Pro, delete the audio track associated with it, and then pull in/merge the previously saved WAV file ... and then finally exporting the combined video/audio.
It would be awesome to do all of my (simple) video editing in LR4, and then simply have an option to fiddle the audio output as shown:
     1. Leave Audio as-is.
     2. Combine Left and Right track into Mono Signal
     3. Delete all Audio
     4. Delete Left Track (optionally convert right track to Mono Signal)
     5. Delete Right Track (optionally convert left track to Mono Signal)
Again, the AGC "problem" is really because the DSLR manufacturers don't allow you to set audio levels on their cameras - this is fixed in the most recent models and also with Magic Lantern ... the later is unfortunately not available for the 7D. But my approach to "defeat" the AGC isn't uncommon and my hope (PRETTY PLEASE! ;-) is that this simple audio editing capability might be easy to add to Lightroom and worthy of consideration.
Thanks,
alek
P.S. Note that I don't see this impacting sales of Adobe Premier since professional videographers are using off-camera sound and are already buying that program. I.e. this is mostly an issue for us hobbiests that are trying to improve the sound quality on the cheap and Premier is total overkill for this - be awesome if LightRoom could help us out a bit.

Hi,
why must I be editing a package to use the find function!? Has been asked for on numerous occasions, and has been agreed to implement in a future drop.
why doesn't the "describe table" functionality work from within a packageThis too has been asked for, and agreed to be implemented in a future drop.
If you'd have read the sticky moderator posts, especially "Feature Requests", you'd have found this on the SQL Developer Exchange ;-)
K.

Can anyone recomend a simple quick audio editing application?

I use Audio Hijack Pro to record all kinds of audio ( e.g. streamed radio, skype calls, voice recordings), all these files are then stored in a folder ready for use later. I often need to trim the beginning and end of these recordings in order to cut off bits of silence or superfluous speech, and I have been doing this in Garageband but this is a rather tedious method as each recording has to be a new project.
What I would like is a simple timeline audio editing application that would just allow me to import the file and open it as a simple waveform and cut and splice the bits accordingly. I think (?) that Quicktime Pro used to do this but I only have Quicktime 10.
Can anyone suggest or recommend such an application? Free or cheap would be good!
Thanks.

You are missing out if you don't use Fission, this is also by Rogue Amoeba. It is integrated fully with AudioHijack Pro for seamless editing.
Hope this solves your problem.

Conforming Audio is driving me up the wall!

Hi all,
Windows Vista Home Premium, i7, 12GB ram, Production Premium CS5.
I am making a DVD in Encore CS5 with 4 AVI files and a static menu.
When I add the Avi video files En conforms the audio...
I was getting frustrated because it seemed the audio was getting lost somewhere so after 'clearing' and re-importing files a few times I came to realise that before conforming the Audio was playing fine but once the Audio was 'conformed' the sound dissapeared? I used AME to create a Wav file from the Avi video files and added them to the EN timelines to get round that problem.
The problem I am having is that EN is conforming the audio every time I go to another window, like Explorer, or even if I preview within EN, I close the preview window (or just come back from explorer) and EN conforms all the files, all over again! It is driving me up the wall!!!
Then I started 'Transcoding Now' my assets and after every Video is finished I get
so I click OK and EN shuts down ...
When I restart it, opening the same project, it gets partway through opening the project then windows leaps in and declares EN to have a problem and the only option is to close the program. I then start it up again and it starts correctly, I can then 'Locate Transcoded File' for the video file I just transcoded.
Seems like ENcore CS5 is no more stable than CS4 and if anything is less stable.
Any ideas? I can still work through all this 'Stuff' and produce DVD's but the Conforming, CONTINUALLY is just so annoying!
Peter

Interesting ideas MobyTrix.
Slight problem in that my Encore project did not spring from a Premiere project, Premiere was not involved at any point. There was something weird going on there because EN had written it's Cache files but everytime I switched windows it just had to write a bunch more, it was irritating to say the least.
I was amazed after having this issue and discovering the folder of conforming files. It had, over the months built up to nearly 600GB of data! After the lengthy process of cleaning the database it reduced to 350GB or so, then I reduced it to 0GB by deleteing it all
As far as I have worked out there are 4 aplications using these files; Premiere, Encore, Soundbooth and After Effects.
I recently upgraded my DivX codecs at the insistant pestering of the DivX software and there after none of my Adobe software could read any of the AVI packaged DivX files, I found some older codecs out there and installed them and everything went back to normal (what ever that may be).
Encore still crashes on startup with certain projects, I uninstalled it and re-installed and nothing changed, it is just fragile, it is consistent at least and robust enough to go through all the little boughts of behaviour and not get 'broken'.
Perhaps it is all Vistas fault LOL. I think it is just the way things are frankly, with so many different 'platforms' and 'standards' it's amazing anything interacts outside of its own family of hardware/software... The longest project I have worked with was 1 hour and 30 minutes (my own video files edited in PPro for Blu-Ray and DVD) and it all went pretty smoothly, I think upgrading from 6 to 12GB of ram made a big difference.
Cheers,
Peter

Simple AUDIO & VIDEO OUT OF SYNCH

Lots of out of synch stuff out there, but all specialized. Mine is SIMPLE. COnnect a Canon Vixia HV40 HD DVD, do a capture, and audio and video are out of synch. It starts fine, but as it goes it drifts away gradually. I have NO IDEA what to do. I am not an expert at this, just an ameteur who loves HD DVD.
It happens upon capture - not when buring to Blu Ray, not when converting WMD files to Torpedo or artillery or atomic or U Tube files, or any other fancy stuff. It's not my brand of BVlu Ray disks, it's not the label I stick on it. I don't do - don't even know how to do fancy editing.
Just copy and burn is REALLY hard.
Just seems so strange that basic capture is so damn difficult and should be so simple - audio just will not line up with video.
HELP!!
I have Win 7 64 Bit, al;l kinds of processor power, latest biggest hammer bought for video editing and gaming. If you need specs I can send.

First, a clarification... Capture is what you do via Firewire from a (usually, as far as I know) tape camera
Please provide EXACT step-by-step details of what you are doing
Also, provide details about the file
Read Bill Hunt on a file type as WRAPPER http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0
What is a CODEC... a Primer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/546811?tstart=0
What CODEC is INSIDE that file? http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0
For PC http://www.headbands.com/gspot/ or http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en
For Mac http://mediainfo.massanti.com/

Driving me nuts: Working with sRGB images for web

Good day ladies and gentlemen, I have a problem that's driving me nuts:
Basically, I want to create a graphic (a logotype) that is going to be used on a website, so I've learned that if I want to create anything for the web, I have to use the monitor color profile instead of the standard sRGB 2.1 because otherwise everything I make in PS will look completely different when opened in a browser or anywhere else, which I learned the hard way.
Now, as long as I only create original content with that kind of color settings - it works. The stuff I make in PS looks the same in a browser. However, as soon as I want to use a photo or in this case a separate graphic with the sRGB color profile - everything starts to fall apart. Everything sRGB I try to import into my non-profiled work turns bleak and with a yellowish tint.
If I change my working color profile to sRGB the photos look like they should, but then instead all my original content will still look completely wrong in a browser or any other application.
I don't believe it HAS to be this way, since there are so many websites that seem to be able to look great and have rich, good-looking photos in them at the same time. I mean, there must be a solution to this problem, no?
I'm using a MacBook Pro (Late 2008) with the 9400M/9600M GT and a Benq EW2430 external monitor over DVI. Mac OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard. Photoshop CS5 with the latest update (12.0.4 I believe?)
Big thanks for any help. It would be greatly appriciated. Let me know if posting any screenshots would help solve the problem.

try this (if you want to)
first highlight the OEM default monitor profile for your monitor in Displays> Color> Display Profile
reboot (and confirm the profile is still highlighted there)
then drag this PhotoDisc tagged sRGB image to your desktop and open it in Photoshop
USE THE EMBEDDED PROFILE (or Edit> Assign Profile: sRGB to be sure)
at that point the color should look correct (exactly as it looks in Safari here - if it doesn't look exactly correct here in Safari, it is because you have a bad monitor profile)
then in Photoshop: Image> Duplicate (to see two same files side by side for a comparison)
then on one image: Edit> Assign Profile (the monitor profile you have loaded in Displays)
be sure to set the profile in the bottom left (see below) so it displays (so we can see them in your screen shot)
THEN TAKE A SCREEN SHOT of the two windows side by side and post it here
(Command+Shift+4 and drag the area you want captured)
If I understand your advice right, you suggest that when I'm creating
stuff for the web, I should always, always use sRGB as my working
space? But then on export I should just not embed the profile, correct?
sRGB is the only color you should ever post on the Internet for web viewing
always CONVERT to sRGB before saving for the web (if it is not already in the sRGB color space) ie, leave that option checked in Save For Web Devices
i think most people don't embed the profile in web images, but this was hit on succinctly above post 13:
There is no true color management on the web. As different browsers offer different types of CM support, the
best that you can do as a designer is to convert to sRGB (if not
already) and save color-critical images with the embedded sRGB profile.
That's the general rule.

Ssrs report from ssas cube , driving me nuts now...

hi folks:
This is driving me nuts and I know it's gonna be some small stupid settings. The question is pretty simple, I want to users to be able to pick up a week from date hierarchy. If I specify a static week, mdx query will run and report shows with
correct data and format.
Now, in the dataset I've created using query designer, I've dragged data hierarchy into the filter and check the parameter box and also put a default value as well. Technically, when I run this report, I am supposed to see a dropdown list with all
the available dates but I did not see any dropdownlist and report still runs with default value.
Why is this happening?
Thanks
Hui
--Currently using Reporting Service 2000; Visual Studio .NET 2003; Visual Source Safe SSIS 2008 SSAS 2008, SVN --

Hi Hui,
Just as Gnanadurai said, a report auto runs when all parameters has their own default values. This scenario can also be occurred when there are no available values for the parameters. So if you want to see a drop-down list with all available dates when the
report runs, we should specify some available values for the parameter. For example, we can specify the available values come from a dataset field. Then the values in the field would be displayed in the drop-down list, we can select some of them to filter
the report.
Reference:
Adding Parameters to Select Multiple Values in a List (SSRS)
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

The new tab behavior is driving me nuts. It keeps re-centering on tabs nearest the start of the list when I move a tab. How do I change this?

The new tab behavior is driving me nuts. It keeps re-centering on tabs nearest the start of the list when I move a tab. How do I change this?
I don't want to download an app. I would rather add a new string in about config or just change of the ones in there to false. It's making my work life rather difficult, to be forced to go all the way back to the end of my list after moving one tab just to have to do it again. I mean it's to the point where I might consider changing browsers if they had tab scroll bars.
Edit: At this point I will download any app. Please make this stupid feature stop.

The result of setting up that code will do exactly as you described: the tabs will be crowded together. I had not noticed any change in behaviour of Firefox with tabs because all the tabs are crowded together, so they cannot scroll, and I very seldom move tabs.

Why doesn't Apple supply a simple audio recording app with the iPad? (Garage Band is not simple app)

I am going to be teaching an integrated media production course in the spring semester (creating an online college newspaper) and I want the students to use mini iPads to create images, videos and sound clips. Images and video, no problem. Easy to move to our iMacs in the lab for editing and inclusion in a college newspaper web site. On the other hand, audio is a mess. Sure, I can have them shoot video, import the video into Final Cut on the iMacs and then use Final Cut like an audio editor, but that is pretty lame. They could download Garage Band but that would require all the students to have iTunes accounts, which is a real pain. And moving audio recording made with Garage Band to the iMac is a real drag and way too much work. Why the **** can't Apple include a simple audio memo program in the basic iPad app setup? This is really old school stuff that was on computers way back when. Using Garage Band for that simple function is like swatting flies with a sledge hammer.
Mike Nielsen
Media Arts
Wesley College

Make finding a simple audio recorder the students first assignment. Have them give presentation. Have file a news story to the 'paper'.
Google is your friend.
ipad audio recording app free
http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-57349000-285/five-free-voice-recording-ipad- apps-compared/
ipad audio recording app
http://www.appolicious.com/curated-apps/7909-best-ipad-audio-recording-apps-jan- 2013

FCP 6.04 spinning its wheels on simple render and driving me round the bend

Hello all:
So everything was going swimmingly... normal work-flow, nothing weird, not asking it to render Hi-Def NTSC anamorphic into SD SECAM 4:3 with a twist of lemon. Just plain old simple rendering of basic effects and filters, etc.
So, for some reason my Mac in league with FCP has decided that these are arduous tasks. FCP spins its wheels (you know, the psychedelic spinning circle that makes you immediately go, "oh f##k!"
After about 20 seconds of teeth clenching spinning it suddenly wakes up and goes, "oh, well that's not so hard..." and then completes the render in 2 seconds.
This is has not happened before... but been going on now for about 2 hours.
What is going on? Please help! I am on the usual crunch deadline... and this is driving me NUTS!

Better post more about your system...
Post the exact versions of:
OS
FCP
QuickTime
system specs
Scratch disk configuration... is it local? etc.?
Also post the exact format you've captured and are working with.
Also let me know how you got to the versions of OS and FCP... did you perform a clean installation lately? i.e., rebuilt your startup disk from the ground up? One thing that can cause havoc is "upgrading" instead of "erase and install" of a new OS or version of studio...
The odd thing is that it spins but renders it OK anyway? weird indeed, never seen this, but sure want to find out why!
Jerry

Hitting "save" is closing my documents & driving me nuts

Recently, anytime I hit "save", the document automatically closes. This happens using various programs (FTP software, Photoshop, Text-wrangler, Text-edit etc). Its driving me nuts. How can I stop this? Im using a macbook pro running 10.6.8
Ive had this computer for years and this just started happening. I dont know why. Im sure I hit a setting somewhere. Can someone help me undo this? Thanks.

I know it may sound strange but it's worth a try.
Change the ethernet cable that connect the D-Link internet port to your ISP modem.
I had a similar problem with a D-Link access point a couple of weeks ago. Intermittent WiFi connection with constant WiFi password request.
A new ethernet cable solved the issue.

"PubSubAgent" is driving me nuts.

I use Little Snitch to monitor outgoing connections. In the last week or so it's started warning me many times a day that something called "PubSubAgent" wants to connect to various addresses that I've never heard of. I tried a Web search for "PubSubAgent" and learned that apparently it has to do with managing RSS feeds and syncing same via .Mac. In 10.5, anyway; I haven't found anything about its function in 10.6. Anyway, in my 24 years using Macs I've never had anything to do with any RSS feeds or with .Mac in any of its incarnations, so I don't know what this is about, but it's driving me nuts.
Mostly it wants to connect to a website named macmouse.com, which turns out to be some kind of Mac dealer/club in Hawaii. If I put the cursor over that address in the LS alert, it'll sometimes show a whole list of URLs "with the same IP address". I've seen up to six addresses in that list, all of them looking like they're connected to the Hawaii place. Then sometimes it'll show macmouse.com only, with no alternatives. Then it showed an alternative as 2153788.sites.myregisteredsite.com, which seems to be a vendor of Web addresses; after I went to look a that site, then PubSubAgent started wanting to connect to it instead of macmouse.com. Then it brought up a completely new one, www.kabsoft.com, which is vendor of "Judaic software". And now, after looking at that site, PubSubAgent wants to go there. I've never had anything to do with these places.
Here it goes again, wanting to connect to www.kabsoft.com, listing macmouse.com and 2153788.sites.myregisteredsite.com as alternatives with the same IP address. I could just tell LS to Deny Forever, but I'd like to know what's going on. Besides, PubSubAgent will probably just come up with another URL it wants to connect to. (It also occasionally wants to go to some Google address.) I've shut down Safari and everything else and Restarted my Mac, but after a while PubSubAgent just starts up again. There is a set of about a dozen Web pages I keep open all the time, but I had the same set open two weeks ago and I'd never heard of PubSubAgent then, so it seems unlikely this behavior has to do with any of them. I tried throwing out ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.PubSubAgent.plist and ~/Library/Caches/com.apple.PubSubAgent/Cache.db, but they just got recreated.
Being a Mac user, I have no real experience with malware, but this behavior looks awfully suspicious—though the sites PubSubAgent wants to connect to do seem to be legit. Can anyone tell me (a) just what PubSubAgent is up to, and (b) what I can or should do about it?
Thanks.

Thanks, WZZZ, for your efforts, though PubSubAgent seems to have you as mystified as it has me. I checked out the "More Like This" list to the right; all were about 10.5, and none seems to offer a real explanation or solution.
One has a post that "solved my problem" with a link to another Discussion, but the link leads to a page that says "Unauthorized: It appears you're not allowed to view what you requested." Apparently that discussion has been scrubbed?
Another has a link to an Apple Support article which apparently no longer exists; the link just leads to the Apple Support home page without explanation. A search of Apple Support for PubSubAgent finds nothing.
Another has a link to a Macworld article which explains that "according to Apple, 'The PubSub agent syncs the RSS read/unread status of bookmarked RSS feeds between computers using Mac OS X 10.5 that are syncing bookmarks via .Mac Sync.'” But says nothing about why PubSubAgent would be trying to connect to mysterious websites I've never been to, and when I've never used RSS or .Mac Sync.
Iow, no one seems to know about this. Doesn't seem to be doing it so often now, though it's back to macmouse.com. I also see from LS's rules that PSA connects to "safebrowsing-cache.google.com", or at least it tried once and I allowed it, thinking that's necessary info. But is PSA really what collects that info? Apple doesn't seem to want us to know anything about it.
I guess I'll just try turning it off and see what happens. Maybe try some other forums.

This is driving me nuts -- Custom easing

Well, I was using flash on someone else's machine, and I
created a custom motion tween ease between two keyframes, and when
I added a new keyframe halfway in between the keyframes it
automatically adjusted the easing on both tweens so that the motion
of the object remained the same.
My home computer does NOT do this automatic adjustment for
me, and it's driving me nuts. I can't figure out how to enable it.
If anyone out there knows what this option is called or how
to turn it on, I would really appreciate it.
Thanks!

>But despite the fact that track 3 is routed OUT to the Master, the Master track does not seem to hear track 3. Thus, I cannot rout the processed track to the master mix for mixdown.
Assuming that I've understood you correctly:
AFAIK, that's quite correct; you can't add a live source to a mixdown. You can determine what you hear by altering the overall monitoring settings (Audition mix, external), but I'm pretty sure that you can't add a 'live' anything to an actual mixdown
process, simply because this is based on file manipulation. So, you have to record it first. And anyway, even if you could do what you want, the timing would be all over the place.

This is driving me Nuts routing question

Okay...here is what i am trying to do:
I am trying to use a hardware device, as an efects unit. I want to be able to apply the resulting processed outgoing signal, to my master mix.
I am following the instruction in the manual for the Hardware unit, which is an effects unit that also functions as VST plug in. I have discovered that the VST part of it, simply allows you to control the dials via a software interface, but that the hardware unit itself, still has to be routed in and out of Audition.
Here is my hook up so far:
I have a dry vocal track in track 1 on my multi tracker.
It is routed to Bus A
Bus A, is routed to outgoing port 3 on my sound card, which carries sends the track to the hardware effects unit.
The processed track comes back through the SPDIF In, on my sound card.
Thus, Track 3 on my multi track window, takes In the SPDIF
Track 3 is also routed out to the Master track
Herre is the net reswult:
The signal gets processed correctly. The wet version comes into track 3 as expected. I can record it onto track 3, if I wish.
But despite the fact that track 3 is routed OUT to the Master, the Master track does not seem to hear track 3. Thus, I cannot rout the processed track to the master mix for mixdown.
My goal is to be able to create a mixdown which would include the processed sound from track 3, but I can't figure out how to make the processed sound go to the Master track, so that it can becoem part of the mix.
Here is a picture of the audition mixer window. Please scroll to the far right of this picture, as I have a dual monitor and the left side is is what i am typing..the right side is the mixer pic.
(ignore track 2...it does nothing)
www.musicfusion.us/collabs/route.JPG
This is driving me nuts. Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks you

>But despite the fact that track 3 is routed OUT to the Master, the Master track does not seem to hear track 3. Thus, I cannot rout the processed track to the master mix for mixdown.
Assuming that I've understood you correctly:
AFAIK, that's quite correct; you can't add a live source to a mixdown. You can determine what you hear by altering the overall monitoring settings (Audition mix, external), but I'm pretty sure that you can't add a 'live' anything to an actual mixdown
process, simply because this is based on file manipulation. So, you have to record it first. And anyway, even if you could do what you want, the timing would be all over the place.

Seemingly Simple Audio Edits Driving Me Nuts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for