Seggregate Automated User provisioning using Access Policy-Diff Groups/Org

Hello there,
By default, the users that are created in OIM - via GTC/via self registration/via Administrator - they all get assigned to "All Users" group. Can we assign these users to a different User Defined group for e.g. "trialgroup", by default and Unassign the "All Users" group. If yes, how can we do that?
This question is related to another question of mine:
I want to avoid all the users that are being created in OIM system - to be all together provisioned to a single IT Resource in my case OID directly via Access policy which can be applied on individual group. I want to keep the system extensible for future purposes. And the only way to seggregate direct resource provisioning via access policy is by means of different "groups". So the solution that I could think of was to assign all the users that are being created currently (via GTC and via Bulk Load into OIM) to a separate group and assign an access policy to the group so that in future if any other resource comes into picture then the system can be extended by creating more groups and designing individual separate access policies for the same.
Does this makes sense?
Please provide your inputs! Any hints/suggestions/ideas are welcomed.
TIA,
- oidm.

I am actually not very sure, what you want to achieve form the content of that post. If you mean that you would not want every user in OIM to be provisioned to OID automatically through access policy, then I am assuming that in that case you will aplly the access policy to the ALL_USERS group.
Well I may be missing the flow of your question, but here is what you can do based on my understanding:
1) Just forget ALL_USERS group. We can no nothing about it. Any User created will be a part of this group and you cannot remove a user from this group.
2) In place of this what you can do is create another group, for instance trialgroup and make all users a member of this group as well. This would be simple to do. See next step. Use addMemberUser() API of addMemberUser interface.
3) Create an Entity adapter with a javatask added, which takes an input of UserID, and assigns that user to this group (trialgroup) in OIM using above API. Attach this adapter to the post-insert trigger of the "Users" data object manager. (It also have another ootb Entity adapter which adds all the users to ALL_USERS group).
4) Attach your access policy to this group.
5) Now also you are free to extend your system by creating more groups and access policies. It shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks
Sunny

Similar Messages

  • Provision Entitlements using Access Policy in OIM & OIA

    Hi All,
    Access policies in OIM does not allow entitlements definition in it such as defining the AD Groups that needs to be attached to the account which would be provisioned on the target resource when the access policy gets triggered. These entitlements definition in OIM is taken care on the Process Form level, whereas in case of OIA the Provisioning polices allow entitlements definition according the resource type in the policy level. It would be of great help if you could help us in understanding how the import and export of access policy data between OIA and OIM would be feasible with these differences in place
    Appreciate any helpful pointer on this.
    Thanks,
    RPB
    Message was edited by: RPB25

    You can edit the Access Policy, select the Resource added-Provide more information, If it has a child table, you can add entitlement to it. you can also add entitlement while exporting OIA policies using accesspolicy api of OIM. But just chek after importing to OIM, the access policies order will be messed.
    sjit

  • Issue in OIM 11gR2Ps2 while provisioning using access policies

    Hi,
    we  are provisioning resources using access policies, we  are facing any issue while provisioning resource using two access policies. we are populating the main process form data using two access policies, according to  the access policy priority we are seeing the first access policy form data value in the user process form, but the second access policy value is not showing in the user process form, for example we are populating processform  fieldvalue1 using access policy1 and processform fieldvalue2 using access policy2.
    Thank you,

    Hi,
    we are facing issue in the following scenario
    we are provisioning a resource based on the user position through access policies, for example  a user  position "contractor" is satisfies two rules based on the rules he will get two roles, these two roles trigger two access policies, and two access policies giving same resource for example "AD", in AD main  process form there two lookups(lookup A,lookup B), we are giving looukp A value in acess policy1 and lookup B value in access ploicy2, when ever user gets AD resource through these roles, after provisioning when we see the user process form only lookup A value is there and lookup B is empty.But i want to get both lookup A,lookup B values, what i observed was based on the  priority access policy values are comming to user resource form, the next access policy form values are not reflecting the user process form.
    Thanks,

  • OIM iPlanet Resource revoked using access policy

    Hi,
    I had created a group and access policy based upon which i tried to provisioned a iplanet resource to a user.
    For this I had created a UDF(say type with value C) and created a rule based on which user is assigned to group say business and also iPlanet resource is provisioned to user
    As I Edit the profile and clear UDF. User is removed from group and also iPlanet resource is revoked.(In Access Policy revoked if no longer applied)
    I am able to do this task Successfully But If iPlanet resource is already allocated to user and I update the UDF(value C) user is assigned to group and iplanet is already assigned to user(muliple resource UNTICK). and now if i again Updated the UDF(mean clear it) user is removed from the group but iPlanet resource is not revoked from the user......
    Can somebody tell me why it is happening??? wheather its a bug in OIM or I am missing something...
    Thanks
    Anil

    If I understand your requirement correctly, when you change the value in process form edit from C to other, iPlanet resource is getting revoked.
    But when you change the the same value from user profile edit, the iplanet is not getting revoked right?
    As per my knowledge I can say, when you update the value for UDF in user profile, you can use triggers USR.TRIGGERS which will update the process form. In this case your process form will gets updated by default.
    This in turn triggers access policy and revokes the resource.
    Hope this helps you

  • Problem with Access policy Provisioning on AD

    Hi,
    I have created an access policy, which will trigger the provisioning the user to AD when the user is added to group 'abc'.
    Its without approval.
    We have object form and process form. Process form is autosave.
    But, the problem is, as soon as the user is added to the group 'abc'.
    It triggers the provisioning flow. But the provisioning will be in ready state only.
    When we go and save the resource form only the provisioning flow triggers.
    If we make the object as auto save, it will work. But in our case we cannot make the object autosave as it has a resource form to be filled by user in other flow.
    Is there any approach to solve the issue?
    Regards,
    SK

    Hi Rajiv,
    So, there is no way we can implement this?
    My requirement is same as this,
    OIM: Question about "Auto Save" option on Resource Object
    I have a Resource Object that needs to be provisioned at least two ways:
    1) thru an access policy by group membership
    2) thru user self-request, who is not already in that group membership
    The problem is if I don't check the "Auto Save" check box the automatic assignment thru access policy is not completing and If I do check the check box then user request is not letting the user to enter values into the resource form. Instead it is directly going to submit request. Looks like these are mutually exclusive.
    Is there a way to make both work on the same Resource Object?
    Thanks
    SK

  • Access Policy and Resources -11gR2

    Hi all,
    I have create an Access policy in 11gR2, its working fine and as per requirement the Resource is getting provisioned / revoked properly.
    In *11gR1* resources provisioned through the Access policy were used to be displayed / listed in the User's Resources tab, In *11gR2* the resources provisioned by Access Policy are not being displayed / listed in under the Accounts tab. is it the default behavior of 11gR2? or some bug? or I need to make any configurations to have it displayed here?
    Regards

    nothing special has to do for showing under Accounts tab. Have you created *'Application Instance'* for the Resource. You have to create Application Instance and run the "catalog sync' job. and once Application Instance is provisioned to user. It will be available under Accounts tab.
    Follow 11gr2 doc for creating application instance
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/resmgt.htm#CBBFAIEC

  • Problem with Access Policy

    Hi All!
    OIM 11g:
    1. I have installed DBUM 9.1.0.4
    2. I have configured IT Resurce, and RO for granting user MS SQL User and database role (for example in HRData db)
    3. I have created Role named: "HRData DB User" and Access Policy named: "HR Data DB User" wchich grants correct RO.
    4. When role is granted by xelsysadm for specific oim user everything is OK.
    Problem:
    when user request for role: "HRData DB User" from Self-Service portal, and request is approved by xelsysadm, role is granted but RO is not granted. I have following error:
    +<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Error> <XELLERATE.SERVER> <BEA-000000> <Class/Method+
    +: tcDataObj/eventPreInsert Error :Insert permission is denied>+
    +<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Error> <oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provis+
    ioning> <IAM-4030308> <An error occurred in oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.p
    rovisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler while provisioning resource 161 to user 4
    +3 and the cause of error is DOBJ.INSERT_PERMISSION_DENIED: H: You do not have permi+
    ssion to insert this object..>
    +<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030081>+
    +<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68.>+
    +<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030082>+
    +<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68, target tye is Role and ope+
    ration is SELFASSIGNROLES.>
    +<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030082>+
    +<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68, target tye is RoleUser and+
    operation is CREATE.>
    Any suggestions?
    best
    mp

    Hi Rajiv,
    So, there is no way we can implement this?
    My requirement is same as this,
    OIM: Question about "Auto Save" option on Resource Object
    I have a Resource Object that needs to be provisioned at least two ways:
    1) thru an access policy by group membership
    2) thru user self-request, who is not already in that group membership
    The problem is if I don't check the "Auto Save" check box the automatic assignment thru access policy is not completing and If I do check the check box then user request is not letting the user to enter values into the resource form. Instead it is directly going to submit request. Looks like these are mutually exclusive.
    Is there a way to make both work on the same Resource Object?
    Thanks
    SK

  • Access policy issue in oim11gr2

    Does auto provisioning through access policy work in 11g R2? I have the manual provisioning working fine.

    may your scheduled task "evaluate user policy" is disabled. Check "evaluate user policy" task, if it is not enabled, enable it and run once manually and let's see

  • How to manipulate users provisions in the planning application MSdatabase

    Hi All.
    I want to change user provisions in the Planning Application MSDatabase without using Hyperion planning .
    How can I directly use msDatabase tables and change user provisions.
    which tables must be used for this operation?

    İ am new in essbase and hyperion planning.
    İn my test system there are alot of user. for example when i have to change some users provisions for accessing some dimensions or forms, i change provisions one by one for all specified users so it takes long times.
    I want to learn that can i change provision options without using hyp planning?, forexample can i change users provisions using with my custom java apllcation.
    And my system is test system so İ can restart it if it is necessary.

  • User Provisioning Issue in Essbase 11.1.2.2

    Hi Experts,
    We have done migration from 11.1.1 to 11.1.2.2 version.Everything went fine but got problem with User provisioning.
    All our users provisioning are managed via Native Groups
    Eg: FIJI_READ,FIJI_WRITE are the Native Groups.
    What we have done is created the Native group provisioned the group with the roles and added the user to the group.
    The problem is the users assigned to these groups “lose” their permissions after sometime. They do still appear to be part of the group when we check in Shared Services, but when we run a MAXL command for a user, say VIBIN:
    DISPLAY USER PRIVILEGE VIBIN;
    It shows the user has having none. The user doesn’t see any cubes on logging in too. From what we’ve seen so far, we can trust the MAXL command output, but not what we see in Shared Services. The user VIBIN still shows as being part of the group FIJI_READ which is provisioned with READ role for the FIJI database. This is very inconsistent behavior.
    The only workaround so far is to directly provision users (i.e.  bypass provisioning via Groups):
    GRANT READ ON DATABASE FIJI.CONSOL TO VIBIN;
    This isn’t very manageable but the ONLY option that seems to be “sticky”. Have anyone gone through this issue  before? Any idea/advice?
    Regards,
    Naveen

    I  exported the Sec file from Security and when i see the content i cant see any groups which are created in Shared Services but only all the applications,databases  and some of the Administrators of the applications only i can see. But normal users who are added in Shared Services to the group i cant able to see.Is there any thing wrong in it.
    Regards,
    Naveen

  • Unable to automatically provision users in AD via Access Policy

    Hello,
    I can connect to AD and provision a user manually to AD via OIM. Goes through just fine. However, if I use an Access Policy to do the same thing, it's stuck in the 'Provisioning' stage. All values are the same in the form.
    Any suggestions on why it works manually but not automatically? I have all values including AD server filled in my form. Is there additional configuration in the Access Policy that I'm missing?

    All fields are prepopulated.
    How do I enable autosave? It's doing the same thing with eDirectory too.
    If I go 'Edit' the task I see all values prepopulated. But they're not getting pushed out to the resource. So if I click 'View' all fields are blank.

  • Provision a RO several times with one user using Access Policies

    Hello,
    we need to provision several Unix machines and for this purpose, we use one only resource object (SSH User). Additionallyl, we created an access policy for every machine:
    - Access Policy Unix Server 1
    - Access Policy Unix Server 2
    - Access Policy Unix Server N
    We created the following group in OIM: SSH Group.
    We set the policies in such a way that whenever a user is added to the SSH Group, the SSH User RO is provisioned with the user for every machine. We created several access policies, because the parameters of the form are different for every machine.
    The problem is that when a user is added to the SSH Group, the SSH User resource object is provisioned only once. It is provisioned by the access policy with the highest priority. We would like that the SSH User RO was provisioned by every access policy. That is, the user should have the SSH User RO provisioned N times, after adding it to the SSH Group.
    Is there any way to achieve this without creating a resource object for every Unix Machine? We need to provision more than 300 Unix machines and this would require a lot of time...
    Thank you for your help

    There are other options. You could create a child table to hold the IT Resource information, assuming all parent data is the same for every system. Then on the insert/delete to child table entries, you can provision and de-provision from that target. On disable/enable you would need to search through the child table and perform the action against all instances. The same for the other update tasks.
    This is the limitation of access policies. They manage a single resource object target instance. You could also code a generic resource that has child table entries. When an insert happens, you can use the APIs to provision and instance of the specific target with the provided details. Then you could create access policies to add entries to the child table, and each would provision the appropriate object, and deprovision too.
    Takes some custom code, but it's doable. Just remember though that they are all still the same resource object, so reporting would show them all, as well as attestation, as a single instance, with multiple provisioned to each user.
    Another option is to duplicate the work flow using find and replace in the XML and generate a unique workflow for each instance.
    -Kevin

  • OIM 11g R2 - AD provisioning based on Role and Access Policy

    Hi, for Active Direcotry integration i used some prepopulation plugin for populationg resource form (based on http://fusionsecurity.blogspot.sk/2013/01/populating-request-attributes-in-oim.html).
    It's work fine - requested account was fully provisioned.
    Can i use this plugins for Role based provisioning?
    I try to create access policy and associated role but when attached the role to the user and run Evaluate User Policies Job, account can't be provisioned.
    In diagnostic.log i found.....
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Immediate consequences are returned with event - InitiatePolicyEvaluationAndProvisioning
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Next Waiting child process is ..........6380 sync = false
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] First Waiting child process is ..........6380
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Kernel executing default validation with process id, event id, entity and operation 6,380.0.Resource.ACCESS_POLICY_BASED_PROVISION
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Kernel completed the child orchestration - 6380.6379
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.dao] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Inserting records for orchestration cleanup
    [oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Completed orchestration with action result - 113

    Hi, all
    I try to fill Access policy Process Form. Account request was created and provisioned when field AD Server and Organization Name was filled in, but pre-population plugin doesn't fired
    The question is.... How can i use pre-population plugin for populating request dataset used with request generated by access policy....
    Is it possible to use plugins for requests generated based on access policy?
    a.

  • How to Apply a Newly Created Access Policy on Existing Users in OIM????????

    How to Apply a Newly Created Access Policy on Existing Users in OIM?
    When the rule is getting failed the user is getting removed from the group but resource is not getting revoked. This is happening only for the old uses..for the users which i created now it working fine..i mean its resource is getting revoked.
    (Retrofit access policy" is checked on the Access Policyand Revoke if not longer applied is checked.)
    For the old users i see the POl_Key is null, for new users i see a value '10'. So i updated the pol_key for old users same as it got generated for new users '10'.
    i even updated the form version too but still revoke doesn't work.
    I cant go for the below approach..
    In order to apply a newly created Access Policy on existing users, one has to make sure that:
    1) "Retrofit access policy" is checked on the Access Policy.
    2) Then run the "Set User Provisioned Date" Schedule task to apply the Access Policy on the existing users in OIM.
    Note: After 9.1.0.1 BP03 the access policy execution has been moved to a new scheduled task "Evaluate User Policies" as mentioned inDocument 839368.1 :How to Use Access Policies to Provision with Groups.
    Is there any other approach i can try.. if you have any idea please reply me asap
    Thanks..

    Thanks for the reply kevin..
    We decided to try the Schedule task (Set User Provisioned Date).
    But i see one problem here after seeing this post in metalik --> Can Access Policies Manage The Life-cycle Of Users Created via Reconciliation? [ID 1136540.1]
    According to this post Access Policies framework does not manage users who are obtained either through trusted reconciliation or target reconciliation.
    Is there any custom way to achieve this??
    How does the access policy framework revoke resource work? (revoke if no longer applies)??
    Edited by: IDMuser19 on Jun 21, 2011 11:43 PM

  • OIM 11g AD Connector Access Policy Based Provisioning Issue

    Hi,
    I created Approval Policy for Access Policy Based Provisioning request type for request level (autoapproval) and operational level (used standart beneficiaryManagerApproval process), but when the resource must assigned to User,- throws exception when running setAdDn adapter of Process Definition Form:
    Running ISADAM
    Target Class = java.lang.String
    Running Get Attribute Map
    Running AD Create User
    Running ISADAM
    Target Class = java.lang.String
    Running GETUSESSL
    Target Class = java.lang.String
    Running CheckUserStatus
    Running GETATTRIBUTEHASH
    Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilHashTableOperations
    Running Set User Attribute
    Running Set User Expiration Date
    Running ISADAM
    Target Class = java.lang.String
    Running CheckUserStatus
    Running GETPWDEXPIRESATTRIBUTEHASH
    Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilHashTableOperations
    Running Set Pwd Expires Attribute False
    Running GETATTRIBUTEHASH
    Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilHashTableOperations
    Running SETADDN
    [2012-07-19T16:15:52.281+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.SERVER] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Insertion of dataobject into database failed
    [2012-07-19T16:16:34.375+03:00] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Exception while trying to get the connection count : 0
    [2012-07-19T16:16:55.422+03:00] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Exception while trying to get the connection count : 1
    [2012-07-19T16:17:12.750+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.APIS] [tid: OIMQuartzScheduler_Worker-10] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-0000000000000003,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcLookupOperationsBean/getLookupValuesFilteredData encounter some problems: The LookupCode 'Lookup.ESSOMFONumbers' does not exist.
    [2012-07-19T16:17:14.703+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.APIS] [tid: OIMQuartzScheduler_Worker-10] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-0000000000000003,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcLookupOperationsBean/getLookupValuesFilteredData encounter some problems: The LookupCode 'Lookup.ESSOMFONumbers' does not exist.
    [2012-07-19T16:17:15.203+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.APIS] [tid: OIMQuartzScheduler_Worker-10] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-0000000000000003,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcLookupOperationsBean/getLookupValuesFilteredData encounter some problems: The LookupCode 'Lookup.ESSOMFONumbers' does not exist.
    [2012-07-19T16:17:15.703+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.APIS] [tid: OIMQuartzScheduler_Worker-10] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-0000000000000003,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcLookupOperationsBean/getLookupValuesFilteredData encounter some problems: The LookupCode 'Lookup.ESSOMFONumbers' does not exist.
    [2012-07-19T16:17:16.469+03:00] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Exception while trying to get the connection count : 2
    [2012-07-19T16:17:37.516+03:00] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Exception while trying to get the connection count : 3
    [2012-07-19T16:17:58.562+03:00] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Exception while trying to get the connection count : 4
    [2012-07-19T16:17:58.562+03:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [STUCK].ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 3f3d2d8955322f32:-2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-00000000000000bb,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: DirectDB/getConnection encounter some problems: Error while retrieving database connection.Please check for the follwoing[[
    Database srever is running.
    Datasource configuration settings are correct. java.sql.SQLException: Unexpected exception while enlisting XAConnection java.sql.SQLException: Transaction rolled back: Event handler ApprovalInitiation is asynchronous but orchestration is configured as synchronous.
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1616)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1503)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:446)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:403)
         at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:364)
         at oracle.iam.platform.utils.vo.OIMDataSource.getConnection(OIMDataSource.java:57)
         at com.thortech.xl.util.DirectDB.getConnection(DirectDB.java:200)
         at com.thortech.xl.util.DirectDB.getConnection(DirectDB.java:148)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.getConnection(tcDataBase.java:3198)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(tcDataBase.java:705)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(tcDataBase.java:271)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.readStatement(tcDataBase.java:221)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.getError(tcDataBase.java:700)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.handleError(tcDataObj.java:1197)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.handleError(tcDataObj.java:1140)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:487)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.insertNonConditionalMilestones(tcORC.java:844)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.completeSystemValidationMilestone(tcORC.java:1159)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOrderItemInfo.completeCarrierBaseMilestone(tcOrderItemInfo.java:735)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOrderItemInfo.eventPostInsert(tcOrderItemInfo.java:171)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUDProcess.eventPostInsert(tcUDProcess.java:234)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:602)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.autoDOBSave(tcORC.java:2995)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcOrderPackages.createOrder(tcOrderPackages.java:526)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcOrderPackages.orderPackageForUser(tcOrderPackages.java:177)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOIU.provision(tcOIU.java:527)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOIU.eventPostInsert(tcOIU.java:303)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:602)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUserProvisionObject.insertImplementation(tcUserProvisionObject.java:283)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:591)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler.execute(ProvisionAccountActionHandler.java:104)
         at oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler.execute(ProvisionAccountActionHandler.java:35)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.EventHandlerDynamicProxy.invoke(EventHandlerDynamicProxy.java:30)
         at $Proxy250.execute(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runActionEvents(OrchProcessData.java:1035)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runEvents(OrchProcessData.java:644)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.executeEvents(OrchProcessData.java:227)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:669)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:716)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrhestrationAsyncTask.execute(OrhestrationAsyncTask.java:108)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.executeUnmanagedTask(TaskExecutor.java:100)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.execute(TaskExecutor.java:70)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.messaging.MessageReceiver.onMessage(MessageReceiver.java:68)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
         at $Proxy311.onMessage(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:574)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:477)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:379)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4659)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4345)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.executeMessage(JMSSession.java:3821)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.access$000(JMSSession.java:115)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:5170)
         at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1522)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:446)
         at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:403)
         at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:364)
         at oracle.iam.platform.utils.vo.OIMDataSource.getConnection(OIMDataSource.java:57)
         at com.thortech.xl.util.DirectDB.getConnection(DirectDB.java:200)
         at com.thortech.xl.util.DirectDB.getConnection(DirectDB.java:148)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.getConnection(tcDataBase.java:3198)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(tcDataBase.java:705)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(tcDataBase.java:271)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.readStatement(tcDataBase.java:221)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.getError(tcDataBase.java:700)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.handleError(tcDataObj.java:1197)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.handleError(tcDataObj.java:1140)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:487)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.insertNonConditionalMilestones(tcORC.java:844)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.completeSystemValidationMilestone(tcORC.java:1159)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOrderItemInfo.completeCarrierBaseMilestone(tcOrderItemInfo.java:735)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOrderItemInfo.eventPostInsert(tcOrderItemInfo.java:171)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUDProcess.eventPostInsert(tcUDProcess.java:234)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:602)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcORC.autoDOBSave(tcORC.java:2995)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcOrderPackages.createOrder(tcOrderPackages.java:526)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcOrderPackages.orderPackageForUser(tcOrderPackages.java:177)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOIU.provision(tcOIU.java:527)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOIU.eventPostInsert(tcOIU.java:303)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:602)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUserProvisionObject.insertImplementation(tcUserProvisionObject.java:283)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(tcDataObj.java:591)
         at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:474)
         at oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler.execute(ProvisionAccountActionHandler.java:104)
         at oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler.execute(ProvisionAccountActionHandler.java:35)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.EventHandlerDynamicProxy.invoke(EventHandlerDynamicProxy.java:30)
         at $Proxy250.execute(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runActionEvents(OrchProcessData.java:1035)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runEvents(OrchProcessData.java:644)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.executeEvents(OrchProcessData.java:227)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:669)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:716)
         at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrhestrationAsyncTask.execute(OrhestrationAsyncTask.java:108)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.executeUnmanagedTask(TaskExecutor.java:100)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.execute(TaskExecutor.java:70)
         at oracle.iam.platform.async.messaging.MessageReceiver.onMessage(MessageReceiver.java:68)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
         at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
         at $Proxy311.onMessage(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:574)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:477)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:379)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4659)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4345)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.executeMessage(JMSSession.java:3821)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.access$000(JMSSession.java:115)
         at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:5170)
         at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
    But when I try to provision this Resource through Access Policy, but without approving it works fine!!!
    Please, Help.
    Edited by: user13830503 on 19/7/2012 6:39

    2e0e6e14:1389f3fa30b:-8000-0000000000000003,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcLookupOperationsBean/getLookupValuesFilteredData encounter some problems: The LookupCode 'Lookup.ESSOMFONumbers' does not exist.
    Make sure the lookup table exists and is spelled correctly in your process task.

Maybe you are looking for