Segment E1EEDPO4 is missing in outbod message type ORDERS05

Hi Gurus,
When I create an Output type for PO using Message type ORDERS05, the segments E1EDP04 is missing in data records. Eventually this segment should carry the tax information. The tax information is very much appeared in Po and it is missing in IDOC. what should I do to make this segment appear in outbound IDOC data records.
Please mention the T codes and steps.
Thanks and regards
Rohini kumar

Hi,
You can use user exits EXIT_SAPLEINM_002 to populate segment E1EDP04 for outbound IDoc ORDERS05.
This segment is not populated in standard FM IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Similar Messages

Segment E1EDPO4 is missing in outbod message type ORDERS01

Hi
I have a problem. Though tax code is existing in PO, in the outbond IDOC type ORDERS01 the segment EIEDP04 is missing. Some cases , this segment is appearing. I really dont know the reason why it is behaving so eratic.
and Plant is defined in the item level for a meterial, it is now showing blank in in the segment EIEDPO1.
dont know the reason why it is behaving so earatically. Please let me know the reason.
It is very very urgent.
regards
rohini kumar

Hey Biju,
The fields are attached to the segments and the data is availble in PO and the Problem is why they are not picking up in original IDOC( while creating an IDOC).
eg: Tax code: V0 has been mentioned in Invoice segment in PO line item. but that is not showing in IDOC output. infact that segment EIEDP04( for taxes) it self is missing in output.
dont know the reason why it is not pickingup.
regards
rohinik umar

IDOC Segment missing for MATMASS Message type

Through change pointer program for the message type YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC is triggered.
1) Change pointers are defined in system for the message type T Code u2013 BD52.
2) If respective field is changed in material master , this data is stored in change pointers table BDCP.
3) Background jobs are scheduled every day, which searches for the changes pointer table and triggers the idoc.
In our case IDOC is getting generated but with one segment missing.
We have analysed the succesful and failed IDOC and found desrepency is field updation of BDCP table.
Succesful case contain material number in object value of ZZMDST field where as failed contain some other value.
Can anyone please help us to guide how the BDCP table is updated and the values are mapped in it or any other suggestion to find why the segment is missing in it.
Regards,
Roshni.

Jürgen L. wrote:
> I have never seen a YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC, nor a ZZMDST field .
> This seems to be home made.
>
> You are expecting that standard SAP programs are generating change pointers for your z-fields?
> Do you see a change history in material master for your z-field?
>
>
> follow the slution from this thread:
>
Yes ,This is a Z -field.
Change pointer is triggering the idoc fo this Z-field but in some cases one segment is missing .
This is z-field in the basic data view of material master.
Yes , we have checked the change history in material master for this field it is getting updated there in BDCP table as well but in BDCP table if this field is flagged then object value is not contain material number instead it contain some other number .
But in case of succesful IDOC the object value is same as material number.
Regards,
Roshni

Which IDOC segments need to be filled for message type CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M

Hi ,
I am working on data migration to CRM7.0 system.I am using LSMW for creating ISU Contracts using CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M message type and CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M01 IDOC kindly help me in what all segments needs to be filled for creating ISU contract in CRM system.
Kindly share if there are any documents related to data migration into CRM system for IS - Utilities.I need to migrate u201CBusiness Partnersu201D, u201DISU Contract Accountsu201D, u201DConnection Objectsu201D, u201DPODu201D & u201CContractsu201D to CRM 7.0 .
Also I need to migrate Customer Interaction Records, Business Activities, Service requests and other information such as u201CProspectsu201D, u201CMarketing Attributesu201D to CRM 7.0.
Kindly help me in this as I am not able to find any thing from web.
Regards,
Suresh.

Hello,
I'm not sure you're taking the best approch.
Usually when you need to migrate ISU contracts into an ISU-CRM integrated system, you first migrate everything you need in ISU through the VERY powerful migration workbench available (transaction code EMIGALL), and then you replicate your data to CRM via INITIAL download.
That's definitely the strategy that will give you the best performance, and less work.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Busson.

Problem In IDOCS of Message Type ORDERS05

I am Trying to place Sales Order as soon as i recieve an idoc of Message Type ORDERS05. But It gives following error when it recieves the idoc of a Purchase Order.
VKORG, VTWEG, SPART cannot be determined for customer 0000003000, vend 0000005595.
I am not Getting This Problem.
Please Help.

Hi,
Please see the link below for some information.
ABAP Development
If you find the info useful please reward with points.
regards
Aveek

Custom segment does not exist for message type Debmas_cfs

Hi,
I have created a custom segment YEXTRA for basic type DEBMAS06.
I have done the configuration in We82 and We20.
I have implemented the segment in User Exit "EXIT_SAPLVV01_001". Now when I am executing the TCODE BD12 then it is creating the Idoc with custom segment. But when I apply the filter on sales org in BD64 then it starts giving me error that " Segment Y**** does not exist for message type DEBMAS_CFS.
Kindly suggest if I need to do some other configuration also.
Thanks.
Regards,
SAurabh

Hi Gearge,
To add custom segments, you should create an extension.
the TCODE is we30.
Refer this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/dc/6b7d6243d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
Regards,
Ravi

IDOC Message type 'ORDCHG' - Sales Order Delete funcanility

Dear Guru's,
I have a requirement for a client where client is sending a EDI message to change & Delete a Sales order. I have mapped change option with IDOC message type 'ORDCHG' and basic message type 'ORDERS05'. Change option for the sales order is working fine.
Can any one tell me with message type 'ORDCHG'. how to delete a Sales Order. In EDI, client is passing only Header segments with Summary details.
Your reply will of greate help to me.
With Best Regards,
M. Rajendran.

Hi Ram,
Thanks a lot for sharing the link, but this dint solve my purpose. I have a different case all to geather.
My client is passing only Header segment and summary segment in the EDI. Thru ORDCHG i need to cancle/Delete entire sales order.
But i found that in standard IDOC Message type 'ORDCHG' only line item deletion/Cancle is availble but i wanted to delete/cancle entire sales document.
Any possibilites available in ORDCHG. Your reply will be much appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
With Best Regards,
M. Rajendran.

Need to ALE only 2 fields through a reduced message type copied from MATMAS

Hi,
Only the Authorization group fields MARA-BEGRU and MARC-QMATA need to be transferred through ALE from one system to another one. A new reduced message type has been created from MATMAS.
The fields BEGRU and QMATA have been selected through the BD53 transaction to be part of the segments.
Result: 3 segments are part of the new Message type: E1MARAM and its 2 children E1MAKTM and E1MARCM.
Problem: Even the BD53 (Reduced message type) transaction has been used, too many unnecessary fields are transferred through the ALE.
The following fields in the E1MARAM segment must not been updated (transferred) in the receiving system:
 - PSTAT,
 - LVORM
 - MTART
 - MBRSH,
 - MATKL,
 - MEINS,
 - GROES,
 - WRKST,
 - SPART,
 - VPSTA.
They should disappear from the segment.
The E1MAKTM segment must not been transferred to the receiving system because the user does not want to modifiy the Material description. But the BD53 (reduce message type) seems to consider that segment as mandatory.
Only few 1EMARCM segments with specific Plants (WERKS) should be sent on the receiving system. Not all the Plants. That segment should not include the PSTAT field. I have no control on which Plants to transfer.
Revision:
Only 2 segments must be ALE'd with only the following fields:
 1- E1MARAM:
 a) MATNR (Material number)
 b) BEGRU (Authorization group)
 2- E1MARCM:
 a) WERKS (Plant)
 b) QMATA (Material Authorization Group for Activities in QM).
What should I do to ALE only those 2 segments and only those specific fields?
Thanks a lot.
Diane.

Thanks Ferry for the previous answer,
I have a problem with the E1MARCM segment.
My sending and receiving systems do not have always the same Plant numbers.
If a Plant exists on the sending system and it does not on the receiving system, the Plant must not be created on the receiving system. But from the sending system, I do not know which Plants the receiving system has. This is why the IDoc contains all the Plants. But I added some logic in the inbound customer-function, EXIT_SAPLMV02_002, to ignore the Plants that do not exist on the receiving system in doing a SELECT on the MARC table in the receiving system.
But that customer-function is called from the IDOC_INPUT_MATMAS01 function module, in the " WHEN E1MARCM " section:
 PERFORM CHECK_USER_EXIT TABLES T_EDIDD
 USER_SEGMENTS
 USING CURRENT TABIX.
 LOOP AT USER_SEGMENTS.
 CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '002'
 EXPORTING
 MESSAGE_TYPE = IDOC_CONTRL-MESTYP
 F_CUST_SEGMENT = USER_SEGMENTS
 ENDLOOP.
In the perform check_user_exit, no record is created in the user_segments table because all the segments in my IDoc start with ' E1 ' :
 LOOP AT IDOC_DATA INTO USER_SEGMENTS FROM CURRENT_TABIX.
 IF USER_SEGMENTS-SEGNAM(2) = ' E1 '.
 EXIT.
 ENDIF.
 APPEND USER_SEGMENTS.
 ENDLOOP.
The customer-function is called within the ' loop at user_segments '. This is why the customer-function is never executed and my code is ignored. So, all the IDocs in the receiving system are in the status 51 (red light).
Do you have any idea how to resolve my problem.
Thanks.
Diane.

Idoc Message type for Scheduling agreement

Dear Experts,
How to configure to create Idoc for Scheduling agreement (not the releaseed schedule lines) ?
I am trying to use message type ORDERS05 but it is not working.
Will any body guide me preferably step by step process for this ?
Thanks in Advance,
Best Regards,
Raju

Hi Anji,
Thanks for the Reply. But i think ORDRSP is for Order Confirmations.
But I have to send Outbound Idoc for a Schedule Agreement.
Whether the same Idoc type & Messge type used for SO/PO(e.g ORDERS05, ORDERS/ORDCHG) can be used for Scheduling Agreement.
Please Advice.
Regards,
Anbalagan

Segment E1IDBW1 is missing for the inbound idoc type PAYEXT

Hello,
the above segment is missing in the inbound idoc - basic type pexr2002.
I have checked in TC-we30 and its available there.
but still the idoc is getting generated without this segment.
can someone suggest.
thanks
Arun

Hi All,
I have a similar query to that of Penny. We are able to get the standard IDOC to generate with segment E1IDBW1. It contains the standard fields INPWEEMP, INPWTXT1, INPWTXT2. However, we have a requirement to manipulate the standard contents of these fields. We wanted to use user exit EXIT_SAPLIEDP_002 to do this.
I have maintained user exit EXIT_SAPLIEDP_002 but when we enter this on creation of the IDOC the segment E1IDBW1 does not seem to be available in table EDIDD_TABLE for manipulation. Can you advise please if (1) you were able to get E1IDBW1 available to edit in exit EXIT_SAPLIEDP_002 and (2) were you able to manipulate the contents of INPWTXT1, INPWTXT2 etc?
We have done the following steps:
- BTE 2441 is available on our release
- house bank has been setup as an In House Cash Center which allows E1IDBW1 to be generated
- entry has been maintained in table FEDICUS with Message Type = PAYEXT, BasicType = PEXR2002, Extension = Blank, Seg Type = E1IDBW1
- code maintained in ZXF08U04
The system enters ZXF08U04 but E1IDBW1 is not available there for manipulation.
Can you advise what we might be missing please?
Thanks and regards
Mike

What's the difference between segment filtering and reduced message type

Hi gurus,
What's the difference between segment filtering and reduced message type? It seems they have the same functionality: Reduce the segment while idoc is generated.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
BD53 is for IDoc Reduction.
this allows you to create a reduced message based upon a standard message type.If you want see mandatory fields. go to T-coe BD53 and give one standard messege type name and eg: matmas
there mandatory fields will be in Green color..
And BD56- This transaction is used to filter out segments of IDocs for combination of sender and receiver. This is usefull in scenarios where a standard IDoc with many segments is used but the receiving partner is only interested in some of the segments
the table related to this transation is TBD20
please go through below blog you have an idea abt that,
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/ReducedMessageTypes
http://saptotal.com/IDoc%20Segment%20Filtering.html
regards,
ganesh.

How to get the segment detials of IDoc message type.

Dear Friends,
I want to write function module , which takes the IDOC message type as an input and returns all the segment fields in response.
Basically I want to get the XML schema of a IDOC message type and need to expose these details toa 3rd party application to use.
Dear experts ,Please do give me some ideas how to achieve this .
like tables from where i can get these details or u feel any other goos way of doing the same.
thx,
jeevan

Hello experts,
Please participate .........
To redefine my objective I will say:--
I am trying to do some thing very similar that is there in XI .
You might have seen the way IDOCs are shown while mapping an idoc structure.
Its like you select a message type and u get all the list of Idoc Structure shown .
I am really relying on you people.
thx ,
jeevan

ZHRMD_A Custome message type issue with custom segments.

Hi Experts,
We have implemented ALE in HR system, we have all other ALE using HRMD_A and we have jobs scheduled for HRMD_A message type. We dont want this job should trigger our model and distribute the data. So we have reduced the HRMD_A messae type to ZHRMD_A for basic type HRMD_A06. Every thing fine. After upgrade of SAP FROM ECC6.O to EHP4, PFAL is not creating IDOC segements for custom segments Z*. for example Z1P0002....ETC, though there is personal data for PERNR.
Please guid if you have come across such situation and solution.
Thanks & Regards.
Venkat.

Hi Venkat,
In the same way i too have one situation like...have different model view with same message types( and same extension type) for various countries from one sender system.
Should i create reduced message type for each model view?
Or can i use same message type HRMD_A for various model views?
If i can use same message type and same extension type for various model views is there any restriction we need to write in USER EXIT EXIT_SAPLRHA0_004?
Regards,
Lava.

Receipients missing in Message type ACPJMM ( message B1003)

HI experts,
I'm getting a strange error while i try to post a goods receipt or goods issue. the message says
receipients missing in Message type ACPJMM ( message B1003)
The Idoc is passed through a ALE layer and the message is assigned with three receipients, either enter the receipients or deactivate the message.
And please remember that i am a SAP MM beginner and help me with the procedure for solving this problem....
Antony

Antony:
Can you please let me know how you solved this problem?

Receipients missing in Message type ACPJMM

HI experts,
I'm getting a strange error while i try to post a goods receipt or goods issue. the message says
receipients missing in Message type ACPJMM ( message B1003)
The Idoc is passed through a ALE layer and the message is assigned with three receipients, either enter the receipients or deactivate the message.
Antony

antony,
please check note 332523
Summary
Symptom
When you post a goods movement, invoice receipt or billing document by means of the IDocs listed below, no quantities are updated in CO. The unit of measure is not transferred as a characteristic to Profitability Analysis.
Additional key words ACLREC, ACLPAY, ACPJMM, ACLREC01, ACLPAY01, ACPJOU01
Cause and prerequisites
The flag for updating the quantity is not set.
Solution
Implement the source code corrections.
Source code corrections
regards
venkadesh

Segment E1EEDPO4 is missing in outbod message type ORDERS05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for